DOCSLIB.ORG

Education for Ethics Investigating the Contribution of Animal Studies to Fostering Ethical Understanding in Children by Amanda Jean Yorke

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Education for Ethics Investigating the Contribution of Animal Studies to Fostering Ethical Understanding in Children by Amanda Jean Yorke Education for Ethics Investigating the Contribution of Animal Studies to Fostering Ethical Understanding in Children by Amanda Jean Yorke GDip.Eq.St; GCert.Ani.Sci; BEd (Honours) Faculty of Education Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2016 Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Amanda Yorke ii Approval to Copy This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Amanda Yorke iii Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, as approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Tasmania) Network – Social Science, Ethics Reference No. H0013094. Amanda Yorke iv Acknowledgements This thesis is the culminating work of a rare occasion in life to pursue two enduring interests. I am immeasurably grateful for the opportunity to combine my life-long passions of education and animals, and I am fortunate to have been accompanied throughout this pursuit by a number of inspirational individuals, both human and non-human. Firstly, I would like to offer the greatest of appreciation to Dr David Moltow, who achieved the balance between offering expert guidance and allowing a level of autonomy that made this project both possible and pleasurable. I offer sincere gratitude to Associate Professor Karen Swabey, who provided unwavering interest and support for the project and whose insightful advice and meticulous attention to detail, was always welcomed. I would also like to thank Dr JF for his valuable early contributions to the research design. I offer my appreciation to the participating school, students, parents, and teachers in the study, whose willingness to share their thoughts and experiences contributed not only to the findings of the study but also to my understanding of the complexities of the development of ethical understanding. The regular contact and spontaneous support offered by family and friends despite the challenges of geographical distance and fierce independence was much appreciated, and I am thankful for the many forms of encouragement that served as a foundation for the resilience and self-reliance required to complete this project. v Ultimately, the greatest acknowledgement has to be reserved for my wonderful sons, Torren and Mason, who serve as sources of distraction and inspiration, never cease to ignite my sense of wonder, have grown with me throughout this experience, and who will forever be the strongest motivation for all that I strive to achieve. Thank you. vi Abstract Educational strategies with the explicit purpose of developing children’s understanding of ethical concepts and the enactment of ethical behaviours have evolved over time to address changing expectations. Over recent years, educational strategies involving animals have gained popularity and a number of questions arise from this. What are the aims and current approaches of animal- focused educational strategies? What is understood about the contribution of human-animal relationships to ethical development? Is it possible for animal- focused educational strategies to contribute to the realisation of the aims of the Australian Curriculum? This study was initiated in response to an identified gap in existing research concerning the current aims of education for the promotion of ethical understanding, the role of human-animal relationships in the development of ethical understanding in children, and the potential contribution to education that could be made by recognition of the connection between these two aspects. The completion of this study fulfilled three objectives; to provide a critical review of current approaches to animal-focused educational strategies, to identify the role of human-animal relationships in the development of ethical understanding in children, and to investigate what contribution can be made by curriculum-based vii Animal Studies to the promotion of multidimensional ethical understanding in children. The research objectives were addressed by employing a mixed methods research approach to conduct a small-scale case study in a one group pre-test – post-test convergent parallel design. A four-week Animal Studies Literacy Program was completed by students between pre-test – post-test administrations. In the absence of comparative studies or existing frameworks addressing the specific focus of this study, an investigative framework was constructed to include quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments. Quantitative instruments comprised the Defining Issues Test (DIT-2), the Griffiths Empathy Measure- Parent Report, the Pet Attitude Scale (Modified), and the Ethical Understanding Curriculum Questionnaire. Qualitative measures included group interviews and written responses to the Animal Studies Literacy Program. The sample population comprised 12 students enrolled in year 7 or year 8 and attending timetabled Literacy lessons, one parent or carer of each student participant, and two teachers. The setting was a Kindergarten-Year 10 Catholic College in Tasmania, Australia. The study provides a comprehensive critical review of current animal- focused approaches relevant to the aims of education for the promotion of ethical understanding. The findings of the case study confirm the multidimensional nature of ethical understanding through the measurement of the development of the dimensions pertinent to ethical judgement, ethical sensitivity, ethical character, viii and ethical identity. The findings have global significance for the field of moral education and the multidisciplinary field of Animal Studies. The isolated assessment of individual dimensions of ethical understanding, to what extent these are being realised in the sample for this study, and how they may be better achieved has significance for the teaching and assessment of educational practices designed to foster the promotion of ethical understanding. Further, the findings of this study, which highlighted the potential role of human-animal relationships in children’s general development but more specifically in the multidimensional development of ethical understanding, will inform the appropriate inclusion of animal-focused educational strategies and the representation of animals within the educational environment. In researching these aspects, future consideration to the inclusion of Animal Studies in educational practices aimed at fostering the promotion of ethical understanding is encouraged. ix Table of Contents Table of Contents Declaration of Originality ........................................................................................ ii Approval to Copy ....................................................................................................... iii Statement of Ethical Conduct ...................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements....................................................................................................... v Abstract ....................................................................................................................... vii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. x List of Tables .................................................................................................................. xxi List of Figures ............................................................................................................. xxiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Questions ................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Background to the Study ........................................................................................ 4 x Table of Contents 1.2.1 The Pedagogical Gap in Education to Foster the Promotion of Ethical Understanding .......................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 An Alternative Pedagogical Approach to Ethical Understanding ................ 10 1.3 Problem and Purpose ............................................................................................ 13 1.4 Significance of the Study ...................................................................................... 14 1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study ...................................................................... 15 1.6 Outline of the Thesis ............................................................................................. 18 1.7 Summary of Chapter 1 .......................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW PART A ................................................................................. 20 Introduction................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected]
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2006 | Issue 1 Article 5 Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Leslie, Jeff () "Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2006: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2006/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Lesliet Is it morally acceptable to use animals in scientific experi- ments that will not benefit those animals, but instead solely benefit people? Most people would say yes; but at the same time most would view the use of animals as a regrettable necessity, to be pursued only when the benefits to people outweigh the harm to the animals, and only after everything possible is done to minimize that harm. Identifying benefits and harms may require specialized scientific and technological understanding, to be sure, but evaluating the tradeoff between them requires not technical expertise, but rather the capacity to make difficult moral judg- ments. We do not usually think of moral judgments as the unique terrain of any particular set of professionals or experts. Anyone capable of ethical reasoning has an equal claim to exper- tise, and a pluralistic society can be expected to exhibit a wide range of moral beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Taken for a Ride
    Taken for a ride The conditions for elephants used in tourism in Asia Author Dr Jan Schmidt-Burbach graduated in veterinary medicine in Germany and completed a PhD on diagnosing health issues in Asian elephants. He has worked as a wild animal veterinarian, project manager and wildlife researcher in Asia for more than 10 years. Dr Schmidt-Burbach has published several scientific papers on the exploitation of wild animals as part of the illegal wildlife trade and conducted a 2010 study on wildlife entertainment in Thailand. He speaks at many expert forums about the urgent need to address the suffering of wild animals in captivity. Acknowledgment This report has only been possible with the invaluable help of those who have participated in the fieldwork, given advice and feedback. Thanks particularly to: Dr Jennifer Ford, Lindsay Hartley-Backhouse, Soham Mukherjee, Manoj Gautam, Tim Gorski, Dananjaya Karunaratna, Delphine Ronfot, Julie Middelkoop and Dr Neil D’Cruze. World Animal Protection is grateful for the generous support from TUI Care Foundation and The Intrepid Foundation, which made this report possible. Preface Contents World Animal Protection has been moving the world to protect animals for more than 50 years. Currently working in over Executive summary 6 50 countries and on 6 continents, it is a truly global organisation. Protecting the world’s wildlife from exploitation and cruelty is central to its work. Introduction 8 The Wildlife - not entertainers campaign aims to end the suffering of hundreds of thousands of wild animals used and abused Background information 10 in the tourism entertainment industry. The strength of the campaign is in building a movement to protect wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Animals II: 2003
    A Strategic Review of International 1CHAPTER Animal Protection Paul G. Irwin Introduction he level of animal protection Prior to the modern period of ani- activity varies substantially Early Activities mal protection (starting after World Taround the world. To some War II), international animal protec- extent, the variation parallels the in International tion involved mostly uncoordinated level of economic development, as support from the larger societies and countries with high per capita Animal certain wealthy individuals and a vari- incomes and democratic political Protection ety of international meetings where structures have better financed and Organized animal protection began in animal protection advocates gathered better developed animal protection England in the early 1800s and together to exchange news and ideas. organizations. However there is not spread from there to the rest of the One of the earliest such meetings a one-to-one correlation between world. Henry Bergh (who founded the occurred in Paris in June 1900 economic development and animal American Society for the Prevention although, by this time, there was protection activity. Japan and Saudi of Cruelty to Animals, or ASPCA, in already a steady exchange of informa- Arabia, for example, have high per 1865) and George Angell (who found- tion among animal protection organi- capita incomes but low or nonexis- ed the Massachusetts Society for the zations around the world. These tent levels of animal protection activ- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or exchanges were encouraged further ity, while India has a relatively low per MSPCA, in 1868) both looked to by the organization of a number of capita income but a fairly large num- England and the Royal Society for the international animal protection con- ber of animal protection groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Taken for a Ride Report
    Taken for a ride The conditions for elephants used in tourism in Asia Preface We have been moving the world to protect animals for more than 50 years. Currently working in more than 50 countries and on six continents, we are a truly global organisation. Protecting the world’s wildlife from exploitation and cruelty is central to our work. The Wildlife – not entertainers campaign aims to end the suffering of hundreds of thousands of wild animals used and abused in the tourism entertainment industry. The strength of the campaign is in building a movement to protect wildlife. Travel companies and tourists are at the forefront of taking action for elephants, and other wild animals. Moving the travel industry In 2010 TUI Nederland became the first tour operator to stop all sales and promotion of venues offering elephant rides and shows. It was soon followed by several other operators including Intrepid Travel who, in 2013, was first to stop such sales and promotions globally. By early 2017, more than 160 travel companies had made similar commitments and now offer elephant-friendly tourism activities. TripAdvisor announced in 2016 that it would end the sale of tickets for wildlife experiences where tourists come into direct contact with captive wild animals, including elephant riding. This decision was in response to 550,000 people taking action with us to demand that the company stop profiting from the world’s cruellest wildlife attractions. Yet these changes are only the start. There is much more to be done to save elephants and other wild animals from suffering in the name of entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Jm Coetzee and Animal Rights
    J.M. COETZEE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS: ELIZABETH COSTELLO’S CHALLENGE TO PHILOSOPHY Richard Alan Northover SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PRETORIA, 0002, SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: Professor David Medalie OCTOBER 2009 © University of Pretoria Abstract The thesis relates Coetzee’s focus on animals to his more familiar themes of the possibility of fiction as a vehicle for serious ethical issues, the interrogation of power and authority, a concern for the voiceless and the marginalised, a keen sense of justice and the question of secular salvation. The concepts developed in substantial analyses of The Lives of Animals and Disgrace are thereafter applied to several other works of Coetzee. The thesis attempts to position J.M. Coetzee within the animal rights debate and to assess his use of his problematic persona, Elizabeth Costello, who controversially uses reason to attack the rationalism of the Western philosophical tradition and who espouses the sympathetic imagination as a means of developing respect for animals. Costello’s challenge to the philosophers is problematised by being traced back to Plato’s original formulation of the opposition between philosophers and poets. It is argued that Costello represents a fallible Socratic figure who critiques not reason per se but an unqualified rationalism. This characterisation of Costello explains her preoccupation with raising the ethical awareness of her audience, as midwife to the birth of ideas, and perceptions of her as a wise fool, a characterisation that is confirmed by the use of Bakhtin’s notion of the Socratic dialogue as one of the precursors of the modern novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 1-2013 Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare Robert C. Jones California State University, Chico, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ethawel Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Nature and Society Relations Commons Recommended Citation Jones, R. C. (2013). Science, sentience, and animal welfare. Biology and Philosophy, 1-30. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare Robert C. Jones California State University, Chico KEYWORDS animal, welfare, ethics, pain, sentience, cognition, agriculture, speciesism, biomedical research ABSTRACT I sketch briefly some of the more influential theories concerned with the moral status of nonhuman animals, highlighting their biological/physiological aspects. I then survey the most prominent empirical research on the physiological and cognitive capacities of nonhuman animals, focusing primarily on sentience, but looking also at a few other morally relevant capacities such as self-awareness, memory, and mindreading. Lastly, I discuss two examples of current animal welfare policy, namely, animals used in industrialized food production and in scientific research. I argue that even the most progressive current welfare policies lag behind, are ignorant of, or arbitrarily disregard the science on sentience and cognition. Introduction The contemporary connection between research on animal1 cognition and the moral status of animals goes back almost 40 years to the publication of two influential books: Donald Griffin’s The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience (1976) and Peter Singer’s groundbreaking Animal Liberation (1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Shivley Colostate 0053A 13792.Pdf (3.519Mb)
    DISSERTATION EXPLORING ANIMAL WELFARE THROUGH AN INVESTIGATION OF VETERINARY EDUCATION AND ON-FARM ASSESSMENTS OF DAIRY CALF WELFARE Submitted by Chelsey B. Shivley Department of Animal Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Temple Grandin Franklyn B. Garry Terry E. Engle Bernard E. Rollin Martha L. Kesel Copyright by Chelsey B. Shivley 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT EXPLORING ANIMAL WELFARE THROUGH AN INVESTIGATION OF VETERINARY EDUCATION AND ON-FARM ASSESSMENTS OF DAIRY CALF WELFARE Animal welfare encompasses many different areas, including science, ethics, economics and law. Veterinarians have an opportunity to serve as leaders in the field of animal welfare due to their interaction with all aspects of animal use. In order to do so, they must be properly trained, and veterinary curricula were evaluated for courses related to animal welfare, ethics, and behavior. Consumers are concerned with how animals are managed, and aspects of welfare of preweaned dairy calves, including colostrum quality, passive transfer status, average daily gain, and bull calf management, were evaluated. The objective of the first study presented in Chapter III was to explore the extent to which veterinary colleges and schools accredited by the AVMA Council on Education (COE) have incorporated specific courses related to animal welfare, behavior, and ethics. The design included a survey and curriculum review. The sample included all 49 AVMA COE–accredited veterinary colleges and schools (institutions). The study consisted of 2 parts. In part 1, a survey regarding animal welfare, behavior, and ethics was e-mailed to the associate dean of academic affairs at all 49 AVMA COE–accredited institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Review of International Animal Protection
    A Strategic Review of International 1CHAPTER Animal Protection Paul G. Irwin Introduction he level of animal protection Prior to the modern period of ani- activity varies substantially Early Activities mal protection (starting after World Taround the world. To some War II), international animal protec- extent, the variation parallels the in International tion involved mostly uncoordinated level of economic development, as support from the larger societies and countries with high per capita Animal certain wealthy individuals and a vari- incomes and democratic political Protection ety of international meetings where structures have better financed and Organized animal protection began in animal protection advocates gathered better developed animal protection England in the early 1800s and together to exchange news and ideas. organizations. However there is not spread from there to the rest of the One of the earliest such meetings a one-to-one correlation between world. Henry Bergh (who founded the occurred in Paris in June 1900 economic development and animal American Society for the Prevention although, by this time, there was protection activity. Japan and Saudi of Cruelty to Animals, or ASPCA, in already a steady exchange of informa- Arabia, for example, have high per 1865) and George Angell (who found- tion among animal protection organi- capita incomes but low or nonexis- ed the Massachusetts Society for the zations around the world. These tent levels of animal protection activ- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or exchanges were encouraged further ity, while India has a relatively low per MSPCA, in 1868) both looked to by the organization of a number of capita income but a fairly large num- England and the Royal Society for the international animal protection con- ber of animal protection groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Sense: the Case for Abolishing Sow Stalls
    January 2013 Science and Sense THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING SOW STALLS This report was written by Dr Malcolm Caulfield and PATRONS reviewed by Voiceless’s Scientific Expert Advisory Council. • Professor J.M. Coetzee It is endorsed by the World Society for the Protection Nobel Prize for Literature Winner 2003, author of of Animals, Compassion in World Farming and Animals The Lives of Animals and Elizabeth Costello Australia. • Brian Sherman AM Businessman and philanthropist Images courtesy of Animals Australia. • Dr Jane Goodall World-renowned primatologist and animal advocate © January 2013 • The Hon Michael Kirby AC CMG ISBN: 978-0-9803740-6-3 (paperback) Former Justice of the High Court of Australia ISBN: 978-0-9803740-7-0 (online) SCIENTIFIC EXPERT ADVISORY COUNCIL Voiceless • Professor Marc Bekoff 2 Paddington Street Professor Emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Paddington NSW 2021 Australia University of Colorado, Boulder. Co-founder with Jane T. +612 9357 0723 F. +612 9357 0711 Goodall of Ethologists for the Ethical Treatment of [email protected] Animals. • Dr Malcolm Caulfield Founder and Principal Lawyer of the Animal Welfare Community Legal Centre. Formerly a pharmacologist in ABOUT VOICELESS industry and academia. Voiceless is an independent and non-profit think tank • Professor Clive Phillips dedicated to alleviating the suffering of animals in Foundation Chair of Animal Welfare, Centre for Animal Australia. Established in 2004 by father and daughter team, Welfare and Ethics, University of Queensland. Brian Sherman AM and Ondine Sherman, Voiceless: • Professor Lesley J. Rogers • Creates and fosters networks of leading lawyers, Emeritus Professor of Neuroscience and Animal politicians, businesspeople and professionals to Behaviour, University of New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Travel Industry Which Companies Are Checking out of Wildlife Cruelty?
    Tracking the travel industry Which companies are checking out of wildlife cruelty? Contents World Animal Protection is registered with the Charity Foreword 3 Commission as a charity and Executive summary 4 with Companies House as a company limited by Why protecting wildlife in tourism matters 6 guarantee. World Animal Protection is governed by its Methodology 9 Articles of Association. Company selection 9 Charity registration number Company ranking 10 1081849 Company registration number 4029540 Results 13 Overall ranking 13 Registered office 222 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X Section 1 – Commitment 14 8HB Section 2 – Targets and performance 18 Section 3 – Changing industry supply 19 Section 4 – Changing consumer demand 21 Conclusion 22 Recommendations 24 Appendix 1 – 10 steps to become wildlife-friendly 26 Appendix 2 – How to draft an animal welfare policy 27 Appendix 3 – Ready-to-go animal welfare policy template 31 Appendix 4 Individual company report summaries and selection rationale for 2020 33 4.1. Airbnb 34 4.2 AttractionTickets.com 36 4.3 Booking.com 38 4.4 DER Touristik 40 4.5 Expedia 42 4.6 Flight Centre 44 4.7 GetYourGuide 46 4.8 Klook 48 4.9 Musement 50 4.10 The Travel Corporation 52 4.11 Trip.com 54 4.12 Tripadvisor 56 4.13 TUI.co.uk 58 4.14 Viator 60 References 62 Cover image: In principle, observing dolphins in the wild is more responsible than observing them in captivity – if managed and implemented responsibly and appropriately. In the wild, dolphins are completely free, live in their natural habitat, and can undertake all of their natural behaviours, such as hunting, foraging, resting, playing and travelling.
    [Show full text]
  • In Recent Years, Animal Attractions Have Become Increasingly Common Within Tourism Destinations
    In recent years, animal attractions have become increasingly common within tourism destinations. Seeing wild animals when travelling is a memorable part of any travel experience and when done responsibly these encounters can play a major role in protecting wildlife and their natural habitats. Unfortunately, there are certain practices that have a known detrimental welfare impact or are wholly exploitative to animals. As a result up to half a million wild animals suffer to entertain tourist around the world. Animals at these wildlife attractions are either taken from the wild or bred in captivity so tourists can swim with a dolphin, take a tiger selfie, walk with lions, ride or wash an elephant or be offered animal souvenirs or by-products. The cruel exploitation of wild animals’ fuels disease emergence, and the latest COVID-19 pandemic is a prime example of that – the unnecessary close contact between humans and wildlife especially where captive animals are subjected to poor welfare conditions can have catastrophic and devastating effects. Sadly, many tourists who love animals aren’t aware of these risks and may actually contribute to animal suffering simply because they’re unaware of the hidden cruelty. Partner: ABTA, followed by ANVR, has classified certain practices as unacceptable and travel providers working with the guidance manuals have agreed that these unacceptable activities should not be supported or offered for sale to their customers. The 2nd edition of this document introduces these practices and explains what they are. Note that the ANVR addendum to the ABTA Animal Welfare Guidelines adds a few more practices to the existing unacceptable list in the ABTA Manual on ‘Unacceptable Practices’.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the World 2020 Our Offices
    Our offices World Animal Protection International World Animal Protection Brazil World Animal Protection India World Animal Protection Thailand 5th floor, 222 Gray’s Inn Road, Rua Vergueiro, 875 – sala 93 D-21, 2nd Floor, Corporate Park, Floor 27, 253 Asoke, Sukhumvit 21 Road, London, WC1X 8HB, UK 01504-000, São Paulo, Brazil Near Sector-8 Metro Station, Dwarka Sector-21, Klongtoei Nuae, Wattana, T: +44 (0)20 7239 0500 T: +55 (11) 3399-2500 New Delhi – 110077, India Bangkok 10110, Thailand F: +44 (0)20 7239 0653 E: [email protected] T: +91 (0)11 46539341 T: +66 (0) 2007 1767 E: [email protected] worldanimalprotection.org.br E: [email protected] E: [email protected] worldanimalprotection.org worldanimalprotection.org.in worldanimalprotection.or.th World Animal Protection Canada World Animal Protection Africa 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 960, Toronto, World Animal Protection World Animal Protection UK Westside Tower, 9th Floor - No. 901 Ontario M4P 2Y3, Canada The Netherlands 5th floor, 222 Gray’s Inn Road, Lower Kabete Road, Westlands, T: +1 416 369 0044 Louis Couperusplein 2 – III London, WC1X 8HB, UK off Brookside Roundabout TF: +1 800 363 9772 2514 HP Den Haag, the Netherlands T: +44 (0)20 7239 0500 P.O. Box 66580-00800, Nairobi, Kenya F: +1 416 369 0147 T: +31 880 2680000 F: +44 (0)20 7239 0653 T: +254 (0)20 217 6598 / E: [email protected] E: [email protected] E: [email protected] +254 (0)727 153 574 worldanimalprotection.ca worldanimalprotection.nl
    [Show full text]