DOCSLIB.ORG

0852 Anc.Soc. 02 Bennett

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0852 Anc.Soc. 02 Bennett CLEOPATRA V TRYPHÆNA AND THE GENEALOGY OF THE LATER PTOLEMIES* According to a fragment of Porphyry, a daughter of Ptolemy X Alexan- der I and Berenice III, of unknown name, accompanied her parents at the time of her father’s deposition and flight in 881. We are told nothing else about her. This paper explores the hypothesis that she was the future Cleopatra V Tryphæna. The discussion touches on several other uncer- tain points in the female genealogy of the later Ptolemies. 1. THE NATURE OF THE SOURCES The evidence for the genealogy of the later Ptolemies falls into two classes. The classical authors provide the bulk of our sources. These works give us a complete genealogy of the line of succession down to Ptolemy X. We are also given the paternity of the remaining rulers — Berenice III, Ptolemy XI Alexander II, Ptolemy XII Auletes, Berenice IV, Cleopatra VII and her brothers — but in none of these cases are we told the names of their mothers. Moreover, much of the classical evi- dence for the later Ptolemies is presented incidentally to the author’s main purpose, not all these authors are fully reliable, nor are they all mutually consistent. Two of the principal sources — Pompeius Trogus and Porphyry — survive only in fragmentary and redacted form, in the works of compilers (Justin and Eusebius, respectively) who lived and wrote several centuries later. The second class of evidence comes from the contemporary inscrip- tions and papyri discovered in Egypt over the last two centuries. These have provided us with a highly refined chronology of changes in the political regime (at least, as seen locally), and have allowed us to track in fine detail changes in royal titulary and the evolution of the royal * I am very grateful to Prof. W. Clarysse for the invaluable research suggestions he has given me in the course of this study. The views expressed are my own, as are any errors or omissions. 1 Porphyry, FGrH 260 F2.8. The later Ptolemies and Cleopatras are numbered in sev- eral different ways. I follow the widely-used convention of RE, and also, where possible, attach a well-known distinguishing epithet on the first introduction of a given ruler. 40 C. BENNETT priesthood. They have also augmented our genealogical knowledge, by providing us the previously-unknown name of Ptolemy XII’s queen, Cleopatra V Tryphæna; two heirs to the throne (Ptolemy ‘the Son’ and Ptolemy Eupator) and possibly a king (Ptolemy VII Neos Philopator)2; and possibly an additional daughter of Ptolemy VIII Physcon, namely Berenice, wife of Psherenptah II, High Priest of Memphis under Ptolemy X3. Attempts to use the Egyptian data to identify errors in the classical sources have been unsuccessful. In 1984, Cauville and Devauchelle argued that the evolution of epithets in the eponymous priesthood shows that Ptolemy IX Lathyros was in fact the son of Ptolemy VIII by his sis- ter Cleopatra II, rather than by her daughter Cleopatra III, as the classi- cal sources would have us believe4. This proposal failed, since it was shown that the pattern of epithets applied to the queens need not be applied consistently, so there is nothing in the Egyptian data which con- tradicts the classical evidence5. An earlier effort to modify the classical genealogy from contemporary Egyptian data was made by Pestman6. In 1967, he proposed that Ptolemy 2 Ptolemy ‘the Son’: W. HUSS, ZPE 21 (1998), p. 229ff.; Ptolemy Eupator: W. HUSS, Pro- ceedings of the 20th International Congress of Papyrologists, Copenhagen 1994, p. 555ff.; Ptolemy VII: M. CHAUVEAU, BIFAO 90 (1990), p. 135ff.; and the sources therein for each. 3 Stele Vienna 82: E.A.E. REYMOND – J.W.B. BARNS, Or 46 (1977), p. 1ff.; E.A.E. REY- MOND, From the Records of a Priestly Family of Memphis, Wiesbaden 1981, p. 127 no. 9. J. QUAEGEBEUR, in Studies on Ptolemaic Memphis (Studia Hellenistica, 24), Louvain 1980, p. 69 no. 24, objected that the text in question is illegible in the published photo- graph of the stele at the point where Reymond argues that the relationship is given. How- ever, he wrote before the publication of Reymond’s monograph, and was therefore unaware that she based her reading on a comparison of the surviving traces to the undoubted occurrence of snt in another line. D. Devauchelle’s review of her final publica- tion (CE 58, 1983, p. 139) ignores the point and simply repeats Quaegebeur’s objection. The context (E.A.E. REYMOND, op. cit., p. 132) requires either a genealogical relationship or a cultic relationship to Ptolemy X. But no separate cult of Ptolemy X is otherwise known to exist. If the relationship is agreed, by elimination, to be genealogical, then the legibility of the text is irrelevant — the only chronologically acceptable possibility is sisterhood. (Cf. the similar conclusions of W. HUSS, Aegyptus 70, 1990, p. 191ff., esp. p. 200.) In my opinion, Reymond’s case is strong enough that a reexamination of the stele using modern image-enhancement techniques is called for. 4 S. CAUVILLE – D. DEVAUCHELLE, REgypt 35 (1984), p. 31ff. 5 L. MOOREN, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Congress of Papyrology, Athens 1988, II, p. 435; J.E.G. WHITEHORNE, Cleopatras, London 1994, p. 123-125. Cauville & Devauchelle also argue that Cleopatra II survived till 107. On this proposal see E. VAN’T DACK, The Judean-Syrian-Egyptian Conflict of 103-101 BC: A Multilingual Dossier Con- cerning a “War of Sceptres”, Brussels 1989, p. 19ff.; D.J. THOMPSON, in L. CRISCUOLO – G. GERACI (eds.), Egitto e storia antica dall’ellenismo all’età araba, Bologna 1989, p. 693ff. 6 P.W. PESTMAN, Chronologie égyptienne d’après les textes démotiques (332 av. J.-C. – 453 ap. J.-C.), Leiden 1967, p. 72(e), 76(b). GENEALOGY OF THE LATER PTOLEMIES 41 XI, whose mother is unnamed in the classical sources, was the son of Berenice III, his father’s wife, and briefly his own, even though Por- phyry calls him Berenice’s stepson7. This argument failed because it was shown that the terminology of the sources was consistent with Por- phyry’s statement, since an exactly similar statement exists that Ptolemy III Euergetes was the son of Arsinoe II, when it is undoubted that his mother was Arsinoe I8. This last observation can be generalised. There are several cases where genealogical statements occur in the Egyptian data which conflict with the classical sources: – Ptolemy III: Egyptian: son of Ptolemy II Philadelphos and his sister Arsinoe II; Classical: son of Ptolemy II and Arsinoe I, daughter of Lysima- chus9. – Berenice II: Egyptian: sister of Ptolemy III; Classical: daughter of Magas of Cyrene, and so Ptolemy III’s cousin10. – Cleopatra I: Egyptian: sister of Ptolemy V Epiphanes; Classical: daughter of the Seleucid Antiochus III, and so Ptolemy V’s third cousin11. – Cleopatra III: Egyptian: daughter of Ptolemy VIII Classical: daughter of Ptolemy VI Philometor, and so Ptolemy VIII’s stepdaughter12. – Berenice III: Egyptian: sister of Ptolemy X; Classical: daughter of Ptolemy IX, and so Ptolemy X’s niece13. – Ptolemy XI: Egyptian: son of Ptolemy X and Berenice III; Classical: son of Ptolemy X and Berenice III’s stepson14. 7 Porphyry, FGrH 260 F2.11. 8 E. VAN’T DACK, op. cit. (n. 5), p. 151-154. 9 OGIS 54 (Adulis inscription); OGIS 56 (Canopus Decree). Cf. Schol. Theocritus 17.128. 10 OGIS 56. Cf. Justin, 26.3. 11 OGIS 773, P. Louvre 9415. Cf. Appian, Syr. 5. 12 P. dem. Berl. 3090, 3091, 3113. Cf. Justin 38.8. 13 P. dem. Ashm. 10. Cf. Pausanias, I 9.3. 14 P. dem. Turin 6085. Cf. n. 7 supra. 42 C. BENNETT There is a clear and consistent pattern to these apparent contradictions. They are readily resolved by interpreting the Egyptian statements within the context of an ideal royal family, consisting of a king, his sister-wife and their children, being succeeded by their son and his sister-wife15. The model can be extended to include those biologically unrelated mem- bers of the priesthood, the administration and the military, who held genealogical titles such as rÌ nsw (‘royal relative’) and even sn nsw (‘king’s brother’)16. In this light, an unsupported assertion in the Egypt- ian sources of the Ptolemaic period about the genealogy of a member of the royal family must be regarded as suspect17. It is curious therefore that the Egyptian description of Cleopatra V as ‘sister’ of Ptolemy XII is often uncritically accepted as genealogical fact18. Those scholars who have recognised the existence of this diffi- culty have usually accepted the proposal faute de mieux19. I can find only two attempts to proceed further, neither of them recent. Bevan noted the possibility that she could have been a daughter of Ptolemy X, but dismissed it without discussion20. On the other side, Macurdy sug- gested that sisterhood is implied by the fact that Ptolemy XII and Cleopatra V are called philadelphoi21. But we can place no greater faith in the genealogical accuracy of such epithets than in Egyptian titles such as snt nsw. Berenice III, philometor and philadelphos, was granddaughter 15 P.W. PESTMAN, op. cit. (n. 6), p. 2 n. 4, goes even further and supposes that the incestuous marriages of the Ptolemaic kings were mere formalities, without a sexual aspect. He believes they were used as a vehicle to legitimise the children born to other women. But, if this were the case, the point of the exercise would be to select the king and queen of the next generation. One would therefore expect each king to have only one surviving ‘son’ and ‘daughter’ by his ‘sister’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sarapis, Isis, and the Ptolemies in Private Dedications the Hyper-Style and the Double Dedications
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 28 | 2015 Varia Sarapis, Isis, and the Ptolemies in Private Dedications The Hyper-style and the Double Dedications Eleni Fassa Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2333 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2333 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2015 Number of pages: 133-153 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Eleni Fassa, « Sarapis, Isis, and the Ptolemies in Private Dedications », Kernos [Online], 28 | 2015, Online since 01 October 2017, connection on 21 December 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ kernos/2333 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/kernos.2333 This text was automatically generated on 21 December 2020. Kernos Sarapis, Isis, and the Ptolemies in Private Dedications 1 Sarapis, Isis, and the Ptolemies in Private Dedications The Hyper-style and the Double Dedications Eleni Fassa An extended version of this paper forms part of my PhD dissertation, cited here as FASSA (2011). My warmest thanks to Sophia Aneziri for her always insightful comments. This paper has benefited much from the constructive criticism of the anonymous referees of Kernos. 1 In Ptolemaic Egypt, two types of private dedications evolved, relating rulers, subjects and gods, most frequently, Sarapis and Isis.1 They were formed in two ways: the offering was made either to Sarapis and Isis (dative) for the Ptolemaic kings (ὑπέρ +genitive) — hereafter, these will be called the hyper-formula dedications2 — or to Sarapis, Isis (dative) and the Ptolemaic kings (dative), the so-called ‘double dedications’.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleopatra II and III: the Queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII As Guarantors of Kingship and Rivals for Power
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Andrea Jördens, Joachim Friedrich Quack (Hg.), Ägypten zwischen innerem Zwist und äußerem Druck. Die Zeit Ptolemaios’ VI. bis VIII. Internationales Symposion Heidelberg 16.-19.9.2007 (Philippika 45), Wiesbaden 2011, S. 58–76 Cleopatra II and III: The queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII as guarantors of kingship and rivals for power Martina Minas-Nerpel Introduction The second half of the Ptolemaic period was marked by power struggles not only among the male rulers of the dynasty, but also among its female members. Starting with Arsinoe II, the Ptolemaic queens had always been powerful and strong-willed and had been a decisive factor in domestic policy. From the death of Ptolemy V Epiphanes onwards, the queens controlled the political developments in Egypt to a still greater extent. Cleopatra II and especially Cleopatra III became all-dominant, in politics and in the ruler-cult, and they were often depicted in Egyptian temple- reliefs—more often than any of her dynastic predecessors and successors. Mother and/or daughter reigned with Ptolemy VI Philometor to Ptolemy X Alexander I, from 175 to 101 BC, that is, for a quarter of the entire Ptolemaic period. Egyptian queenship was complementary to kingship, both in dynastic and Ptolemaic Egypt: No queen could exist without a king, but at the same time the queen was a necessary component of kingship. According to Lana Troy, the pattern of Egyptian queenship “reflects the interaction of male and female as dualistic elements of the creative dynamics ”.1 The king and the queen functioned as the basic duality through which regeneration of the creative power of the kingship was accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In
    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers
    “Pure intellectual stimulation that can be popped into Topic Subtopic the [audio or video player] anytime.” History Ancient History —Harvard Magazine The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, erudite, living legend lecturers. Academia’s best lecturers are being captured on tape.” —The Los Angeles Times The History “A serious force in American education.” —The Wall Street Journal of Ancient Egypt Course Guidebook Professor Bob Brier Long Island University Professor Bob Brier is an Egyptologist and Professor of Philosophy at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University. He is renowned for his insights into ancient Egypt. He hosts The Learning Channel’s popular Great Egyptians series, and his research was the subject of the National Geographic television special Mr. Mummy. A dynamic instructor, Professor Brier has received Long Island University’s David Newton Award for Teaching Excellence. THE GREAT COURSES® Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, VA 20151-2299 Guidebook USA Phone: 1-800-832-2412 www.thegreatcourses.com Cover Image: © Hemera/Thinkstock. Course No. 350 © 1999 The Teaching Company. PB350A PUBLISHED BY: THE GREAT COURSES Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfi elds Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 Phone: 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax: 703-378-3819 www.thegreatcourses.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 1999 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Romanzo Di Nino Tra Due Culture: Analisi Del Testo, Ricostruzione Del Contesto, Definizione Del Genere
    Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN STUDI LETTERARI E CULTURALI Ciclo 30° Settore Concorsuale: 10/D2 Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: L-FIL-LET/02 TITOLO TESI IL ROMANZO DI NINO TRA DUE CULTURE: ANALISI DEL TESTO, RICOSTRUZIONE DEL CONTESTO, DEFINIZIONE DEL GENERE Presentata da: ELENA SUBRANI Coordinatore Dottorato Supervisore PROF.SSA SILVIA ALBERTAZZI PROF. LIVIO SBARDELLA Esame finale anno 2019 ABSTRACT Dalla lettura e analisi dei frammenti restanti del Romanzo di Nino si evince che le dinamiche dei personaggi, seppur a grandi linee afferenti alla struttura del romanzo greco d’età imperiale, non corrispondono ad una matrice di cultura greca, perciò l’origine del testo va ricercata altrove, più precisamente nell’ambiente che immediatamente emerge dai frammenti, cioè quello mesopotamico. Molteplici elementi della trama di questo ‘romanzo’, che contengono in loro germi e modi che saranno ripresi in epoca imperiale, risultano fortemente influenzati, infatti, da schemi e plot del Vicino oriente antico. Tutto ciò appare congruo ad una cultura sincretica come quella ellenistica, età in cui nacque l’opera. La ricerca si è svolta, dunque, in direzione di un’analisi di elementi, strutture e dettagli del mondo della narrativa mitologica vicino-orientale che potessero essere stati influenti per il plot del Romanzo di Nino. L’attenzione, in particolare, si è rivolta verso storie e miti della cultura sumera e assiro-babilonese e le possibilità di comparazione si sono rivelate notevoli. I miti in cui sono state ritrovate delle quasi precise corrispondenze sono quelli sumerici di Enlil e Ninlil ed Enlil e Sud, databili alla fine del III-inizio II millennio a.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet by Elizabeth Jones
    Well-behaved women seldom make history – Fact sheet By Elizabeth Jones Anne Bonny Job description: Professional pirate Born: March 8, 1702, Kinsale, Republic of Ireland Died: Unknown How she is unconventional: Anne Bonny was a woman living in a world where women were actively excluded. All sailors, not just pirates, believed allowing women onboard would bring bad luck because they distracted the men from their work and might become a cause for conflict. While men were in favor of excluding women from a life at sea, Anne wished she had more women fighting at her side as she made her final stand. “Dogs! If instead of these weaklings I only had some women with me,” she screamed at her crew. —Charles Johnson, A General History of the Pyrates Video Link: http://player.history.com/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&tPid=21115861 Harriet Tubman Job description: Civil Rights Activist Birth: c. 1820 Death: March 10, 1913 How she is unconventional: Harriet Tubman escaped slavery to become a leading abolitionist. She led hundreds of enslaved people to freedom along the route of the Underground Railroad. "I was the conductor of the Underground Railroad for eight years, and I can say what most conductors can't say; I never ran my train off the track and I never lost a passenger." – Harriet Tubman http://www.biography.com/people/harriet-tubman-9511430/videos/harriet-tubman-union-spy- 15036995841 Hypatia Job description: Scholar, Teacher, Philosopher, Mathematician and Astronomer Born: 350 CE, Alexandria, Egypt Died: March 8, 415 CE, Alexandria, Egypt How she is unconventional: In a time of religious strife at the intellectual center of the ancient world, Hypatia of Alexandria was the first woman in history recognized as a mathematician and scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading G Uide
    1 Reading Guide Introduction Pharaonic Lives (most items are on map on page 10) Bodies of Water Major Regions Royal Cities Gulf of Suez Faiyum Oasis Akhetaten Sea The Levant Alexandria Nile River Libya Avaris Nile cataracts* Lower Egypt Giza Nile Delta Nubia Herakleopolis Magna Red Sea Palestine Hierakonpolis Punt Kerma *Cataracts shown as lines Sinai Memphis across Nile River Syria Sais Upper Egypt Tanis Thebes 2 Chapter 1 Pharaonic Kingship: Evolution & Ideology Myths Time Periods Significant Artifacts Predynastic Origins of Kingship: Naqada Naqada I The Narmer Palette Period Naqada II The Scorpion Macehead Writing History of Maqada III Pharaohs Old Kingdom Significant Buildings Ideology & Insignia of Middle Kingdom Kingship New Kingdom Tombs at Abydos King’s Divinity Mythology Royal Insignia Royal Names & Titles The Book of the Heavenly Atef Crown The Birth Name Cow Blue Crown (Khepresh) The Golden Horus Name The Contending of Horus Diadem (Seshed) The Horus Name & Seth Double Crown (Pa- The Nesu-Bity Name Death & Resurrection of Sekhemty) The Two Ladies Name Osiris Nemes Headdress Red Crown (Desheret) Hem Deities White Crown (Hedjet) Per-aa (The Great House) The Son of Re Horus Bull’s tail Isis Crook Osiris False beard Maat Flail Nut Rearing cobra (uraeus) Re Seth Vocabulary Divine Forces demi-god heka (divine magic) Good God (netjer netjer) hu (divine utterance) Great God (netjer aa) isfet (chaos) ka-spirit (divine energy) maat (divine order) Other Topics Ramesses II making sia (Divine knowledge) an offering to Ra Kings’ power
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel 11 Part 22 Talk About Slogging Through! the Historical Details Are Legion in This Section of Scripture
    1 graceWORKS ! GOING DEEPER The Papou Study Bible is a daily study provided by me to help folks explore the depth and joy of the “conneXion” life of God. It’s my personal study, and is not intended as a doctrinal statement or statement of any church or denomination or congregation. It’s also my belief that “grace” works, and the servant of God should always want to go deeper. Multi- tasking as usual, I’m also calling this the “Papou Study Bible.” I’m writing it as if I were speaking to my girls who love me and any descendant they have that love their Papou too. And to anyone who wants to consider me a spiritual Dad or “Papou.” I want them to be able to study the Bible with Papou (grandpa in Greek) after I’m gone---and if they don’t, I’ll haunt them. The Scriptures say it’s noble to “search the Scriptures daily” to verify truth like the ancient Bereans did (Acts 17:11). My folks came from Berea. My incredible Dad (and your grandfather and great grandfather, guys), Vasil Charles Valekis taught me to do this like he did---every day until I die. He taught me and everyone I know to go to church no matter what and to put God first. While Mama (Maria Pagona Stratakis Valekis) never really did this, she made sure we listened to Daddy on this one. She would have hit us with a spatula or frying pan or worse if we didn’t. This is a simple sharing my “daily search.” And I’d like to think it is a continuation of God’s life through my Dad through me.
    [Show full text]
  • Depiction of Cleopatra III (Possibly Her Mother), Assimilated Into Isis
    FRANCK GODDIO UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGIST PTOLEMAIC QUEEN One of the IEASM’s most beautiful finds in Thonis-Heracleion is this Greco-Egyptian-style statue from the Ptolemaic Period. The queen in dark stone is clad in the traditional gown identifying female rulers with Isis. The hair, its plaited strands modelled with exceptional care, is encircled by a dia- dem adorned with the uraeus of kings. The eye inlays, which personalized the face, have disappeared. Pharaonic style with different artistic influence The effigy, which is larger than life- sized, depicts a female figure standing, with arms down by her sides and the left foot slightly forward. This position respects the traditional Pharaonic style, but the modelling of the surface and of the physiognomy bears witness to a different artistic influence. In her left hand the queen is holding the ankh sign (the sign of life) and on her chest her garment bears the ‘Isis knot’. She is dressed in a fine chemise with a scooped neckline. Determined look of a middle-aged woman The ovoid face grows more slender towards the chin. The mouth, with its carefully modelled lips, is thin and tight, giving the individual a stern, determined look. The large, almond- shaped eyes are hollow. The creases at the neck emphasize that the woman is middle-aged. The hair, arranged into long, rolled-up curls, falls down the back and sides. Above the forehead, the locks are shorter, leaving an open triangle on the forehead above the nose. The hair is encircled by a broad, flat dia- dem. In the middle of the forehead is a uraeus, rearing-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleopatra VII: How Modernity Altered One of Egypt's Most Infamous
    Phi Alpha Theta Pacific Northwest Conference, 8–10 April 2021 Isabeau Newbury, Carroll College, undergraduate student, “Cleopatra VII: How Modernity Altered One of Egypt’s Most Infamous Pharaohs” Abstract: In the course of history, many people are fascinated by the “other” but this fascination stems from works that are not factual depictions of an event or person. If the personification of historical figures is continuously perpetuated in fictional works, how we interpret the evidence can then be affected by these works. This is especially true of the ancient women in power in Ancient Egypt, but specifically in the case of Cleopatra VII, who was the last Pharaoh of Egypt. This study is designed to look at how desire vs fact changes the narrative, and how we need to be cautious about exotifying the “other.” Cleopatra VII’s image in modernity has been shaped by her portrayal in Shakespeare and Dante, as well as in Renaissance and contemporary artwork (including film). By keeping this in mind, it is not wrong to be fascinated by the “other” but it raises the question of how much of a historical person’s character can we really know if the facts we perceive to be true are affected by fictional manipulations of them. Cleopatra VII: How Modernity Altered One of Egypt’s Most Infamous Pharaohs Isabeau Newbury Carroll College Omega-Eta Undergraduate 2 Cleopatra VII: How Modernity Altered One of Egypt’s Most Infamous Pharaohs Women throughout ancient history have been portrayed by those who write it as the damsel in distress, the snake, the jealous and enraged, and as the seductress.
    [Show full text]