DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Article (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Article (PDF) Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 329 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) Study on the Quest of Philosophical Identity: Definition of Philosophy in Chinese Historical- Philosophical Writings at the Beginning of the 20th Century* Valery Kiselev Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The present article examines a range of attempts origins of Chinese philosophy" (中国哲学起源考), published in to give a definition to the term ‘philosophy’, undertaken in the newspaper "Cultural Heritage Bulletin" (国粹学报 ) in Chinese works on the history of Chinese philosophy in the Shanghaiin 1906. In the article in the framework of the early 20th century. Focus of the article is on the writings of Xie traditional Chinese approach, Liu Shipei noted that Chinese Wuliang, Hu Shih, Zhong Tai and Feng Youlan. These philosophy mainly refers to the traditional teachings of the researchers were pioneers in formulating the first histories of sages and to the canons. Chinese philosophy, and in their works, they tried to figure out the problem field of philosophy and identify the place and role In the early 20th century, from 1916 to 1936, there were of the Chinese thought in the global philosophy. Modern published several works on the history of Chinese understanding of philosophy in China is based on the philosophy. In these writings a serious work on the definition definitions provided for in these writings. of the concept of philosophy, the development of chronological and problem frameworks of Chinese and Keywords—philosophy; Chinese philosophy; history of world philosophy was carried out. Chinese philosophy; Xie Wuliang; Hu Shih; Zhong Tai; Feng Youlan II. XIE WULIANG: THE FIRST HISTORY OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY I. INTRODUCTION In 1916, there was published the first history of Chinese The definition of philosophy in the Contemporary philosophy written by a Chinese scholar, it was “The History Chinese Dictionary looks quite familiar to the Western of Chinese Philosophy” by Xie Wuliang (谢无量, 1884-1964). reader, and at the same time, this definition has an obvious Marxist influence. “Philosophy is a doctrine of the In the introduction to the work Xie Wuliang paid a lot of worldview. It is a synthesis and generalization of natural and attention to explaining what philosophy is. He used the term social knowledge. The main questions of philosophy are zhexue, but it is obvious that this term had not yet settled by “thinking” and “being”, “spirit” and “matter”, etc.” [1]. The the time, it was unusual for the reader, so demanded word “philosophy”, namely zhexue, appeared in the Chinese explanation. Xie Wuliang argued that despite the western language only at the beginning of the 20th century. These origin of the term ‘philosophy’– «In ancient books there was two characters (哲学) — zhe (wise, sagacious; wise man, no name for philosophy. In the West, there was [a name], in sage), and xue (learning, knowledge) were combined into a the East it was translated» [4] – philosophy itself had a new word (Japanese reading of this word - tetsugaku) by a universal character. In the West and in China philosophy Japanese scholar and educator Nishi Amane in an article Bai strives for wisdom, moreover, the literal meaning of the Yi Xin Lun ( 百一新论 ), published in 1874 [2]. Chinese western term philosophy is ‘love of wisdom’, similar attitude scholars started to use the term zhexue at the very beginning towards philosophy was in China, too, e.g. «Confucius, the of the 20th century. In 1901-1903 there appeared a series of founder of Chinese philosophy, praised the love of learning works with the word zhexue in the title, although this word ( 好学) and noted that the love of knowledge leads to referred primarily to Western philosophy [3]. The phrase wisdom» [4]. zhongguozhexue for "Chinese philosophy" was first used by Giving the definition to philosophy Xie Wuliang wrote: Liu Shipei (刘师培, 1884-1919) in the article "Study of the “How did heaven and earth appear? How did all things (万物) The paper is a part of research project "Methodological problems of come about? How did the man appear? He who knows this is studying the history of philosophy in the context of translation studies" No called a wise man. If you do not know, but strive to know the 16-03008-06, carried out with financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). 274 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 329 answers to these questions, this is the beginning of ancient Chinese philosophy before the 3rd century BC, this philosophy” [4]. work immediately overshadowed the previous writing, to the extent that many researchers forgot about the work of Xie Trying to more accurately outline the problem field of Wuliang and referred "The Outline" as to the first history of philosophy in China and, at the same time, to demonstrate its Chinese philosophy. similarity to Western philosophy, Xie Wuliang pointed out the division of philosophy and science that had existed since There was a great and rapid shift in understanding of the ancient times. He marked out daoshu (道术, the art of Tao) philosophy in China in the beginning of 20th century. Hu as “philosophy”, and separated it from “science” — fangshu Shih directly used terms ‘philosophy’ (zhexue, 哲学) and (方术, the magical art), pointing that Chuang Tzu accepted ‘philosophers’ (zhexuejia, 哲学家), without any explanation this division. “Zhuang Zhou said that the art of Tao (daoshu) of the Western origin of this term. Hu Shih understood had become unusable and after that a magical art (fangshu) philosophy as a universal phenomenon, so he didn’t pay appeared. Daoshu have nothing that would not be one, while attention to the origin of the name, but only to the fangshu cleared the various sides of [reality]. Daoshu is phenomenon itself. Hu Shih started his research of the philosophy, and fangshu is science” [4]. history of Chinese philosophy from the definition of the latter. For him, “[a]ny science that explores the most Xie Wuliang believed that Confucian Six Classics1 and 2 important issues of human life, and in the search of basic the nine schools of thought included all those areas that solutions reasoning from its origins, is called philosophy" [7]. made up the content of modern Western philosophy, i.e. This definition, on one hand, shows anthropological metaphysics, epistemology and ethics. approach of the traditional Chinese thought (focused on the Based on this, Xie Wuliang concluded that Chinese problems of human life), and on the other hand reflects a thought could be defined as‘philosophy’, and it corresponded pragmatist background of Hu Shih (centered on solving to the Western understanding of philosophy. Philosophy in specific problems and based on the idea of division of China originated in ancient times. The origins of philosophy and science). In later works Hu Shih made philosophical (Xie Wuliang insisted that it was precisely definition of philosophy more precise, he wrote,“[p] philosophy, not pre-or protophilosophy) knowledge he saw hilosophy examines the most important issues of human life, in the ideas of the mythological rulers of ancient China, Fu comprehending them from the point of view of significance, Xi and Huang-di [4]. and seeks significance that can be to a certain extent universal” [8]. Clarifying the role of philosophy, Hu Shih Readers perceived the “History of Chinese Philosophy” pays much attention to the ethical component of the extremely critically. It was noted that the innovation of this philosophical thought. For him, "ordinary people either work was only in the title and the definition of the term convince others to do well and not wrong, or encourage good "philosophy", while the main content was a retelling of the deeds and punish the bad", while “philosophers, when “Shiji” (史记, "The Records of the Grand Historian") and meeting with similar problems, study what is “good” and other canonical works [5], [6]. “evil”, find out the nature of “good” and “evil” [7]. In “The Outline”, Hu Shih also brought forward a III. HU SHIH: CHINESE PRAGMATIST AND EXPERIMENTER concept of the development of world philosophy. In his A completely different approach to understanding opinion, there were four sources of the origin of philosophy, philosophy can be seen in the second work on the history of i.e. China, India, Greece and Judea. As a result of historical Chinese philosophy, in "The Outline of the History of interaction, Indian philosophy merged with Chinese, giving Chinese Philosophy" by Hu Shih ( 胡适, 1891-1962), rise to neo-Confucianism, and Jewish philosophy dissolved published in Shanghai in 1919. Hu Shih was the most into Greek, forming medieval European philosophy. Hu Shih devoted of all the Chinese students of John Dewey (1859- was extremely optimistic about the future formation of a 1952). After returning to China, he actively promoted unified world philosophy based on the synthesis of neo- pragmatism, participated in organizing Dewey's visit to Confucianism and Western philosophy. China, translated his lectures, and also consistently applied pragmatist methodology in his studies on Chinese IV. ZHONG TAI: TRADITIONALISTIC APPROACH AND philosophy, literature and culture. REJECTION OF ANALOGIES WITH THE WEST “The Outline of the history of Chinese philosophy. In 1929 Zhong Tai published “The History of Chinese Volume 1” was published three years after the publication of Philosophy”. Zhong Tai (钟泰, 1888-1879) studied in Japan “The History of Chinese Philosophy” by Xie Wuliang. at the University of Tokyo. At the time of the publication of Although only the first volume was published, devoted to the “The History of Chinese Philosophy”, he was a professor at the department of Studies of Chinese ancient civilization at 1 Six Classics: namely: Book of Songs (诗经), Book of History (尚 the Zhijiang University (Hangzhou, China).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Examination of Confucius' Rectification of Names
    Journal of chinese humanities � (���6) �47-�7� brill.com/joch A New Examination of Confucius’ Rectification of Names Cao Feng (曹峰) Professor of Philosophy, Renmin University, China [email protected] Translated by Brook Hefright Abstract Confucius’ explanation of the “rectification of names” is not necessarily related to the theories of “social status” and “names and actuality.” The reason scholars have inter- preted the rectification of names in the Analects in so many different ways is, to a large degree, due to assumptions about Confucius’ thinking by his successors, and based on the views on rectification of names among later generations. In the course of the devel- opment of thinking about names, scholars have augmented Confucius’ own explana- tion, gradually fleshing it out from an empty shell into a substantial edifice. The original meaning may have been very simple: Confucius did not wish to establish a standard system of names. Rather, he was simply the first person in history to realize the impor- tance of language in politics. As a politician, Confucius noticed and foresaw the influ- ence that the indeterminacy, ambiguity, and arbitrariness of names could have on politics. He discerned the political consequences when language could not accurately express meaning or when there was no way for people to accurately perceive it. He also recognized how names, as a way of clarifying right and wrong and establishing norms, could have a great effect on a society’s politics. Although Confucius noted that disunity in speech could lead to disunity in politics, he did not propose a solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Feng Youlan's Interpretation of Western Philosophy
    ASIANetwork Exchange | Fall 2014 | volume 22 | 1 Feng Youlan’s Interpretation of Western Philosophy: A Critical Examination from the Perspective of Metaphysical Methodology Derong Chen Abstract: This paper concentrates on Feng’s interpretation of Western philosophy from the perspective of metaphysical methodology and aims to display a limited observation of Feng’s interpretation of Western philosophy through the window of metaphysical methodology. Based on a brief review of the recent studies of Feng Youlan and Western philoso- phy, this paper analyzes the progress and insufficient aspects in current studies on this issue and particularly clarifies what are the metaphysics and metaphysical methods in the context of Feng Youlan’s philosophy. In clarifying Feng’s interpreta- tion of Western philosophy from the perspective of methodology, this paper further critically analyzes Feng’s positive metaphysical methods and negative metaphysical methods, and assumes that Feng’s negative metaphysical methods essentially is a kind of attitude towards metaphysics but neither a kind of metaphysics nor a kind of metaphysical methods. Instead of characterizing metaphysical methods as positive and negative as Feng did, this paper suggests an alternative division of metaphysical methods: direct and indirect methods of dealing with metaphysical issues. Keywords Feng Youlan; metaphysics; metaphysical methods; Western philosophy; negative metaphysics In the twentieth century, Feng Youlan was one of the Chinese intellectuals most deeply Derong Chen is a Sessional involved in the dialogue and interaction between Chinese and Western philosophies. In Lecturer II at the University of addition to studying Western philosophy at Columbia University, he systematically con- Toronto Mississauga. ducted research on Western philosophy, specifically the philosophy of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Five Trends in Confucian Studies
    1 INTRODUCTION: FIVE TRENDS IN CONFUCIAN STUDIES John Zijiang Ding For over a decade, Confucian studies have gone through several evolutions and developments. From 2010 to today, this area has delivered a number of the fine scholars. This special issue of JET will examine the works of those Confucian scholars who have advanced significantly in the last few years in certain genres, and also share our thoughts on where certain tendencies are heading in the near future. For this purpose, we will analyze and compare five current trends in Confucian studies: global-contextualism, Asian-modernism, Asian-Americanism，multi-comparativism, and classical-textualism. We will offer an overview of these five trends revealing how each of them comprise a significant movement in Confucian studies. In addressing each, we will provide certain theoretical critiques and the responses to those critiques. The main thrust of this issue is to examine the similarities and differences among (between) those scholarly inquiries as well as to justify those research programs which are debatable, controversial and even confusing. I. Confucian Studies Based on Global-Contextualism Generally, contextualism means that any system of claims, values, and activities cannot be understood outside of the real cultural context in which they occur. For many scholars, to understand the philosophical background of contextualism is very helpful in exploring the real meanings of these crucial concepts in Confucianism. A modern practice of classical Confucianism requires a contextualist interpretation of the world. As virtue, consequent or normative ethics, Confucianism should be contextualized, globalized, and developed as the modern way of thinking emphasizing rationality and practice over traditional considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodernism and Classical Chinese Philosophy
    Cultural and Religious Studies, March 2016, Vol. 4, No. 3, 194-203 doi: 10.17265/2328-2177/2016.03.005 D DAVID PUBLISHING Postmodernism and Classical Chinese Philosophy Yong-Kang Wei University of Texas (RGV), Texas, USA While over two thousand years apart, Western postmodernism and ancient Chinese philosophy share some extraordinary similarities, especially epistemology wise. For example, they both recognize the role of language in constructing, and limiting, knowledge and reality. This is because thinkers of different cultures and geographical regions, and of different historical periods, can possibly come up with similar philosophical conclusions when addressing what is commonly known as the “human condition”. The paper will discuss, in general terms, some of the philosophical similarities between postmodernism and classical Chinese philosophy; it will also take a close look at three concepts in Chinese philosophy that register strong affinity with Western postmodernism: namely, change, dialectic, and relativism. Keywords: postmodernism, modernism, classical Chinese philosophy Introduction Postmodernism, as a philosophical concept, was first introduced in China by Fredric R. Jameson in 1985, when he was lecturing on “postmodernism” and “cultural theory” at Peking University (Wang, 2008). So readers may immediately sense a chronological incongruity between postmodernism and classical Chinese philosophy. However, it is quite possible, I would argue, that thinkers of different cultures and geographical regions, and of different historical periods, can come up with similar conclusions when addressing what is commonly known as the “human condition”. For example, Confucius’ “己所不欲，勿施于人” (Don’t do things to others that you don’t want done to yourself) is echoed, almost identically, in the Christian Bible, and Protagoras’ (490-420 B.C.) paradox rings very similar to the “two-argument” theory (两可论) of Deng Xi1 (邓 析, 545-501 B.C.), a Chinese philosopher of the Spring and Autumn Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Guoxue): Six Perspectives and Six Definitions
    China Perspectives 2011/1 | 2011 The National Learning Revival National Learning (Guoxue): Six Perspectives and Six Definitions Liu Dong Translator: Guannan Li Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5380 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5380 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2011 Number of pages: 46-54 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Liu Dong, « National Learning (Guoxue): Six Perspectives and Six Definitions », China Perspectives [Online], 2011/1 | 2011, Online since 30 March 2014, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5380 ; DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5380 © All rights reserved China perspectives Special feature National Learning (Guoxue): Six Perspectives and Six Definitions LIU DONG* Guoxue deserves “such popularity” vious “fever” trends, this cultural movement was not promoted from the top down, but from the bottom up. The public has pressed cultural de - Let us first review how guoxue has “occurred” by citing an observation mands for guoxue . This is the key characteristics of the new guoxue trend. from a scholar who lives outside of China. Although Dirlik’s view on the relationship between Confucianism and the economic rise of Asia is not well-balanced, he keenly captures the question The concept of “ guoxue ,” which ceased to draw attention for more of how the rise in the market was closely associated with the deployment than four decades, was resuscitated almost overnight in mainland of Confucian doctrines as a means of making profit. Indeed, in China, from China in the so-called “ guoxue fever” of the 1990s… A variety of fo - universities to the Temple of Confucius, from book stores to private rums appeared on TV; several prestigious universities established schools, from book writing to academic lectures, all are contaminated by guoxue training classes in order to nourish “spiritual resources” money.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology and Significance of the Legalists School and the School Of
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) The Ideology and Significance of the Legalists School and the School of Diplomacy in the Warring States Period Chen Xirui The Affiliated High School to Hangzhou Normal University [email protected] Keywords: Warring States Period; Legalists; Strategists; Modern Economic and Political Activities Abstract: In the Warring States Period, the legalist theory was popular, and the style of reforming the country was permeated in the land of China. The Seven Warring States known as Qin, Qi, Chu, Yan, Han, Wei and Zhao have successively changed their laws and set the foundation for the country. The national strength hovers between the valley and school’s doctrines have accelerated the historical process of the Great Unification. The legalists laid a political foundation for the big country, constructed a power framework and formulated a complete policy. On the rule of law, the strategist further opened the gap between the powers of the country. In other words, the rule of law has created conditions for the cross-border family to seek the country and the activity of the latter has intensified the pursuit of the former. This has sparked the civilization to have a depth and breadth thinking of that period, where the need of ideology and research are crucial and necessary. This article will specifically address the background of the legalists, the background of these two generations, their historical facts and major achievements as well as the research into the practical theory that was studies during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Optimal Design of Soccer Robot Control System Based on The
    2019 International Conference on Modern Education and Economic Management (ICMEEM 2019) The History of Chinese Philosophy in New Education in China in the Early 20th Century Valery Kiselev1,a 1Department of History of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia Keywords: Chinese philosophy, History of Philosophy, Xie Wuliang, Hu Shih, Zhong Tai Abstract: Over the centuries, China has developed its own system of knowledge and values. In the mid-19th century, this system faced a serious challenge as a result of a clash with the Western civilization. In order to survive, China needed to borrow the Western knowledge, to change the education system and even to transform its basic worldview. The article discusses the importance of the formation of the history of Chinese philosophy for the transformation of the views and values of the Chinese society in the early 20th century. 1. Introduction Clash with the Western countries in the middle of the 19th century during the Opium Wars clearly demonstrated the inability of the state, based on Chinese traditional views, to compete with the modern Western civilization. Many thinkers and public figures raised the question of the need for fundamental transformations of society and the state. The verity of traditional views was not questioned, but doubts arose about the need to study the Western sciences. Some officials commenced translating the Western books into Chinese, they began to collect and analyze information on the state and social structure of the Western countries. One of the first encyclopedic works that introduced knowledge about the Western countries to the Chinese readers were “Gazetteer of Four Continents” (四洲志) by the Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu (林则徐, 1785-1850) and “Illustrated Treatise on the Maritime Kingdoms” (海国图志) by the Chinese scholar Wei Yuan (魏源, 1794-1856).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Examination of Confucius' Rectification of Names
    Journal of chinese humanities � (���6) �47-�7� brill.com/joch A New Examination of Confucius’ Rectification of Names Cao Feng (曹峰) Professor of Philosophy, Renmin University, China [email protected] Translated by Brook Hefright Abstract Confucius’ explanation of the “rectification of names” is not necessarily related to the theories of “social status” and “names and actuality.” The reason scholars have inter- preted the rectification of names in the Analects in so many different ways is, to a large degree, due to assumptions about Confucius’ thinking by his successors, and based on the views on rectification of names among later generations. In the course of the devel- opment of thinking about names, scholars have augmented Confucius’ own explana- tion, gradually fleshing it out from an empty shell into a substantial edifice. The original meaning may have been very simple: Confucius did not wish to establish a standard system of names. Rather, he was simply the first person in history to realize the impor- tance of language in politics. As a politician, Confucius noticed and foresaw the influ- ence that the indeterminacy, ambiguity, and arbitrariness of names could have on politics. He discerned the political consequences when language could not accurately express meaning or when there was no way for people to accurately perceive it. He also recognized how names, as a way of clarifying right and wrong and establishing norms, could have a great effect on a society’s politics. Although Confucius noted that disunity in speech could lead to disunity in politics, he did not propose a solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Chinese Philosophy.Pdf
    CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PHILOSOPHY Edited by CHUNG-YING CHENG AND NICHOLAS BUNNIN CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PHILOSOPHY Dedicated to my mother Mrs Cheng Hsu Wen-shu and the memory of my father Professor Cheng Ti-hsien Chung-ying Cheng Dedicated to my granddaughter Amber Bunnin Nicholas Bunnin CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PHILOSOPHY Edited by CHUNG-YING CHENG AND NICHOLAS BUNNIN Copyright © Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 First published 2002 2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3 1 Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148 USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF UK All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Contemporary chinese philosophy / edited by Chung-ying Cheng and Nicholas Bunnin p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-631-21724-X (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-631-21725-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Philosophy, Chinese—20th century. I. Cheng, Zhongying, 1935– II.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN H. BERTHRONG/ Globalizing Confucianism: the Rudao (儒道)
    GLOBALIZING CONFUCIANISM: THE RUDAO (儒道) John H. Berthrong I. Globalization Globalization is a complex concept.1 Moreover, it is a controversial idea, and like all contested and intricate concepts, simply trying to define the term is difficult. Along with the obvious spatial metaphor of encompassing the whole world, literally globalization, we also need to consider the temporal dimensions of the term. For instance, W. C. Smith (1981) begins his study of world/global theology by telling a fascinating story of globalization, a particular process that took more than two thousand years work its way around the world. There was certainly a great deal of interaction among cultures prior to the modern world, though admittedly the speed and intensity of the contact has increased dramatically. One of the interesting questions is: does the increase in the velocity and quantity of transmission of everything collated by the idea of globalization really mean a complete change from the past? Is globalization a completely new event in the history of the world? Smith (1981, 7-11) begins and ends his story in India. He starts with a story drawn from pre-Aryan India about a fascinating case of what we would now call globalization—perhaps. Smith commences with an account of the religious transformation of the like of Leo Tolstoi. As Tolstoi wrote in his Confessions, he found one story, a Christian hagiography of Saints Barlaam and Josaphat that changed his life. It is a story of a young prince, Josaphat, who goes into the desert and is converted by a Sinai desert monk, Barlaam—a clear reference, as we will see of a Buddhist bodhisattva tale.
    [Show full text]
  • Axiological Rules and Chinese Political Philosophy
    zhao dunhua AXIOLOGICAL RULES AND CHINESE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY I. The Meaning of Axiological Rules By axiological rules I mean “four maxims of actions,” which are meta- phorically expressed as “golden,” “silver,” “brass,” and “iron” rules. The golden rule is stated as “do unto others what you want them to do unto you”; the silver rule, “don’t do unto others what you don’t want them to do unto you”; the brass rule, “do unto others what they have done unto you,” and last, the iron rule, “do at first unto others what you don’t want them to do unto you.”1 These rules are axiological in the sense that they serve as value directives for moral, nonmoral, and immoral decision makings. The golden rule, viewed by many as the universal rule for morals, has been often confused with the silver one.2 The brass rule is viewed by many as equivalent to the rule of reciprocity; a “tit for a tat,” which accord- ing to recent literature in English academic circles, is rooted in the sociobiological aspect of human nature.3 By contrast, the iron rule has escaped scholarly attention, probably because of its obviously objec- tionable immoral nature. Philosophical moralists customarily main- tain that immoral actions are essentially acts of “not following the rule,” ostensibly as a result of a chaotic, confused mind. But this contention rests on flimsy evidence at best. It is not uncommon to find proverbs in many cultures, which express maxims for evil acts. For example, there is a Chinese proverb given by Cao Cao, the dominant military lord in the period of the Three Kingdoms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformations of PRC Academic Philosophy: Maoist Features and Their Use Under Xi Jinping
    DOI: 10.4312/as.2019.7.1.219-245 219 The Transformations of PRC Academic Philosophy: Maoist Features and Their Use under Xi Jinping Yvonne SCHULZ ZINDA*1 Abstract To mark a period of transformation in China, Xi Jinping has been drawing on elements of the Maoist legacy, not only in the political arena but also in academia. In 2014, New Philosophy of the Masses was published, an updated and expanded version of Ai Siqi’s Phi- losophy of the Masses. In May 2016, Xi Jinping (2016) delivered his “Talk at the Forum Discussing the Work in Philosophy and Social Sciences,” a title which is reminiscent of Mao Zedong’s (1980) “Talks at the Yan’an Forum on Literature and Art” of 1942. Draw- ing on the background of China’s 1950s academic philosophy, a comparison will be drawn to Xi Jinping’s effect on China’s academic landscape. Keywords: philosophy of the masses, academic philosophy, Xi Jinping, Chinese charac- teristics, socialist ritual communication Transformacija akademske filozofije Ljudske republike Kitajske: Maoistične značilnosti in njihova uporaba pod vlado Xi Jinpinga Izvleček Pri označevanju obdobja transformacije na Kitajskem se Xi Jinping naslanja na elemente Maoistične zapuščine, ne samo na političnem, ampak tudi na akademskem prizorišču. Leta 2014 so objavili Novo filozofijo množice, posodobljeno in razširjeno različico Ai Si- qinove Novo filozofijo množice. Maja 2016 je imel Xi Jinping (2016) govor z naslovom »Govor na forumu debat o filozofiji in družboslovju«, ki spominja na Mao Zedongov govor iz leta 1942 z naslovom »Yan’anski govori o književnosti in umetnosti« (1980). Preko raziskave okoliščin kitajske akademske filozofije iz 50.
    [Show full text]