DOCSLIB.ORG

ACC/AHA/ESC Practice Guideline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACC/AHA/ESC Practice Guideline ACC/AHA/ESC Practice Guideline ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias*—Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias) Developed in Collaboration With NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society Committee Members Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, Co-chair; Melvin M. Scheinman, MD, FACC, Co-chair; Etienne M. Aliot, MD, FACC, FESC; Joseph S. Alpert, MD, FACC, FAHA, FESC; Hugh Calkins, MD, FACC, FAHA; A. John Camm, MD, FACC, FAHA, FESC; W. Barton Campbell, MD, FACC, FAHA; David E. Haines, MD, FACC; Karl H. Kuck, MD, FACC, FESC; Bruce B. Lerman, MD, FACC; D. Douglas Miller, MD, CM, FACC; Charlie Willard Shaeffer, Jr, MD, FACC; William G. Stevenson, MD, FACC; Gordon F. Tomaselli, MD, FACC, FAHA Task Force Members Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, FESC, Vice-Chair; Joseph S. Alpert, MD, FACC, FAHA, FESC; David P. Faxon, MD, FACC, FAHA; Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FESC; Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FACC, FAHA†‡; Gabriel Gregoratos, MD, FACC, FAHA; Loren F. Hiratzka, MD, FACC, FAHA; Sharon Ann Hunt, MD, FACC, FAHA; Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA; Richard O. Russell, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA† ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines Members Silvia G. Priori, MD, PhD, FESC, Chair; Jean-Jacques Blanc, MD, PhD, FESC; Andzrej Budaj, MD, FESC; Enrique Fernandez Burgos, MD; Martin Cowie, MD, PhD, FESC; Jaap Willem Deckers, MD, PhD, FESC; Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia, MD, FESC; Werner W. Klein, MD, FACC, FESC‡; John Lekakis, MD, FESC; Bertil Lindahl, MD; Gianfranco Mazzotta, MD, FESC; João Carlos Araujo Morais, MD, FESC; Ali Oto, MD, FACC, FESC; Otto Smiseth, MD, PhD, FESC; Hans-Joachim Trappe, MD, PhD, FESC *This document does not cover atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation is covered in the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation found on the ACC, AHA, and ESC Web sites. †Former Task Force Member ‡Immediate Past Chair This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in August 2003, by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in July 2003, and by the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines in July 2003. When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology request that the following citation format be used: Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Campbell WB, Haines DE, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Miller DD, Shaeffer CW, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias.). Circulation 2003;108:1871–1909. This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org), the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org), and the European Society of Cardiology (www.escardio.org), as well as published in the October 15, 2003, issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, the October 14, 2003, issue of Circulation, and the 24/20 October 15, 2003, issue of the European Heart Journal. Single and bulk reprints of both the full-text guidelines and the executive summary are available from Elsevier Publishers by calling ϩ44.207.424.4200 or ϩ44.207.424.4389, faxing ϩ44.207.424.4433, or writing to Elsevier Publishers Ltd, European Heart Journal, ESC Guidelines—Reprints, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BY, UK; or E-mail [email protected]. Single copies of executive summary and the full-text guidelines are also available by calling 800-253-4636 or writing the American College of Cardiology Foundation, Resource Center, at 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase bulk reprints (specify version and reprint number—executive summary 71-0261 and full-text guideline 71-0262): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (U.S. only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1789, fax 214-691-6342; or E-mail [email protected]. (Circulation. 2003;108:1871-1909.) © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, Inc., and the European Society of Cardiology Circulation is available at http://www.circulationaha.org DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091380.04100.84 1871 1872 Circulation October 14, 2003 Table of Contents 1. Acute Conversion of Atrioventricular Node– Preamble .....................................1872 Dependent Tachycardias ................1901 I. Introduction ...............................1872 2. Prophylactic Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy .1901 A. Organization of Committee and Evidence B. Supraventricular Tachycardias in Adult Review ................................1872 Patients With Congenital Heart Disease ......1901 B. Contents of These Guidelines—Scope .......1873 1. Introduction ..........................1902 II. Public Health Considerations and Epidemiology .1873 2. Specific Disorders .....................1902 III. General Mechanisms of Supraventricular Arrhythmia . .1874 C. Quality-of-Life and Cost Considerations .....1903 A. Specialized Atrial Tissue ..................1874 References ....................................1904 B. General Mechanisms .....................1874 IV. Clinical Presentation, General Evaluation, and Preamble Management of Patients With Supraven- These practice guidelines are intended to assist physicians in tricular Arrhythmia ...........................1874 clinical decision making by describing a range of generally A. General Evaluation of Patients Without acceptable approaches for the diagnosis and management of Documented Arrhythmia ..................1874 supraventricular arrhythmias. These guidelines attempt to 1. Clinical History and Physical Examination .1874 define practices that meet the needs of most patients in most 2. Diagnostic Investigations ...............1875 circumstances. The ultimate judgment regarding care of a 3. Management .........................1876 particular patient must be made by the physician and the B. General Evaluation of Patients With patient in light of all of the circumstances presented by that Documented Arrhythmia ...................1876 patient. There are situations in which deviations from these 1. Diagnostic Evaluation ..................1876 guidelines are appropriate. 2. Management .........................1878 V. Specific Arrhythmias ........................1880 I. Introduction A. Sinus Tachyarrhythmias ..................1880 A. Organization of Committee and 1. Physiological Sinus Tachycardia .........1880 Evidence Review 2. Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia .........1881 Supraventricular arrhythmias are a group of common rhythm 3. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome .1883 disturbances. The most common treatment strategies include 4. Sinus Node Re-entry Tachycardia ........1883 antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation. Over the past B. Atrioventricular Nodal Reciprocating Tachycardia .1884 decade, the latter has been shown to be a highly successful and 1. Definitions and Clinical Features .........1884 often curative intervention. To facilitate and optimize the man- 2. Acute Treatment ......................1884 agement of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias, the 3. Long-Term Pharmacologic Therapy ......1884 American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), the 4. Catheter Ablation .....................1885 American Heart Association (AHA), and the European Society C. Focal and Nonparoxysmal Junctional Tachycardia .1886 of Cardiology (ESC) created a committee to establish guidelines 1. Focal Junctional Tachycardia ............1886 for better management of these heterogeneous tachyarrhythmias. 2. Nonparoxysmal Junctional Tachycardia . .1887 This document summarizes the management of patients with D. Atrioventricular Reciprocating Tachycardia supraventricular arrhythmias with recommendations for diag- (Extra Nodal Accessory Pathways) ..........1888 nostic procedures as well as indications for antiarrhythmic drugs 1. Sudden Death in WPW Syndrome and and/or nonpharmacologic treatments. Risk Stratification .....................1888 Writing groups are specifically charged to perform a 2. Acute Treatment ......................1889 formal literature review, weigh the strength of evidence for or 3. Long-Term Pharmacologic Therapy ......1889 against a particular treatment or procedure, and include 4. Catheter Ablation .....................1890 estimates of expected health outcomes where data exist. 5. Management of Patients With Asymptomatic Patient-specific modifiers, comorbidities, and issues of pa- Accessory Pathways ...................1891 tient preference that might influence the choice of particular 6. Summary of Management ..............1891 tests or therapies are considered, as are frequency of E. Focal Atrial Tachycardias .................1891 follow-up and cost effectiveness. In controversial areas, or 1. Definition and Clinical Presentation ......1891 with regard to issues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Generation Antiarrhythmic Agents: Have We Reached Antiarrhythmic Nirvana?
    JACC Vol. 9. NO.2 459 February 1987:459-63 EDITORIAL REVIEWS Second Generation Antiarrhythmic Agents: Have We Reached Antiarrhythmic Nirvana? LEONARD N. HOROWITZ, MD, FACC, JOEL MORGANROTH, MD, FACC Philadelphia, Pennsylvania During the first half of the 20th century, antiarrhythmic some cases novel, but because their preapproval evaluations therapy was principally directed toward supraventricular ar­ followed a more rigorous and circumspect path. More in­ rhythmia; only relatively recently has therapy of ventricular formation is available to us so we can decide when and how arrhythmias been emphasized. In fact, significant pharma­ these agents should be employed. cologic treatment of ventricular arrhythmias was minimal Like all antiarrhythmic drugs of the first generation, the until routine use of quinidine and procainamide began in new agents have the potential to provoke or worsen ven­ the 1950s (1,2). The first generation oral antiarrhythmic tricular arrhythmias. These proarrhythmic effects vary in drugs, quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide, previ­ incidence and may present a major problem in certain patient ously constituted the principal antiarrhythmic agents for long­ groups such as those with sustained ventricular tachyar­ term treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in the United States. rhythrnias, reduced left ventricular function and conduction Compared with modem regulatory standards, the data on disturbances. In common with other antiarrhythmic drugs, which the use of these drugs was based were modest at best the second generation drugs have not been shown to prevent and rudimentary at worst. However, because good clinical sudden death in patients with ventricular ectopic activity. judgment compensates for a multitude of deficiencies, we These factors, along with efficacy and potential toxicity, have been able to provide effective antiarrhythmic therapy must be considered in selecting antiarrhythmic regimens for to many patients with this rather limited pharmacopoeia.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulation Development Strategies
    FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR ORAL EXTENDED RELEASE DOSAGE FORMS Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) eingereicht im Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von ARAYA RAIWA aus Bangkok, Thailand May, 2011 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Roland Bodmeier 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Siepmann Disputation am 9.Juni 2011 TO MY FAMILY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Roland Bodmeier for his professional guidance, helpful advices and encouragement. I am very grateful for his scientific and financial support and for providing me such an interesting topic. Furthermore, I am very thankful to him for the opportunity to support his editorial role in the European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jürgen Siepmann for co-evaluating this thesis. Thanks are extended to Prof. Dr. Herbert Kolodziej, Prof. Dr. Johannes Peter Surmann and Dr. Martin Körber for serving as members of my thesis advisor committee. I am particular thankful to Dr. Andrei Dashevsky, Dr. Nantharat Pearnchob and Dr. Martin Körber for their very useful discussion; Dr. Burkhard Dickenhorst for evaluating parts of this thesis; Mrs. Angelika Schwarz for her assistance with administrative issues; Mr. Andreas Krause, Mrs. Eva Ewest and Mr. Stefan Walter for the prompt and diligent technical support. Sincere thanks are extended to Dr. Ildiko Terebesi, Dr. Burkhard Dickenhorst, Dr. Soravoot Rujivipat and Dr. Samar El-Samaligy for the friendly atmosphere in the lab My special thanks are owing to all members from the Kelchstrasse for their practical advice, enjoyable discussion and kindness throughout the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Compounds and Bulk Powders
    UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs Program Number 2021 P 1014-13 Program Prior Authorization/Notification Medication Compounds and Bulk Powders P&T Approval Date 1/2012, 02/2013, 04/2013, 07/2013, 10/2013, 11/2013, 2/2014, 4/2014, 10/2014, 4/2015, 7/2015, 4/2016, 10/2016, 10/2017, 10/2018, 10/2019, 5/2020, 1/2021 Effective Date 4/1/2021; Oxford only: 4/1/2021 1. Background: Compounded medications can provide a unique route of delivery for certain patient- specific conditions and administration requirements. Compounded medications should be produced for a single individual and not produced on a large scale. A dollar threshold may be used to identify compounds which require Notification and must meet the criteria below in order to be covered. Drugs included in the compound must be a covered product. Claims for patients under the age of 6 will process automatically for First-Lansoprazole, First-Omeprazole, and Omeprazole + Syrspend SF compounding kits. 2. Coverage Criteriaa: A. Authorization for compounds and bulk powders will be approved based on all of the following criteria (includes bulk powders requested as a single ingredient such as bulk powder formulations of cholestyramine or nystatin when the powder formulation requested is not the commercially available FDA approved product): 1. The requested drug component is a covered medication -AND- 2. The requested drug component is to be administered for an FDA-approved indication -AND- 3. If a drug included in the compound requires prior authorization and/or step therapy, all drug specific clinical criteria must also be met -AND- 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft for Public Comment
    Draft for Public Comment Practice guideline update: Treatment of painful diabetic polyneuropathy Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Authors (Alphabetical order—final order to be determined later in the guideline development process) Carmel Armon, MD, MSc, MHS1,Vera Bril, MD2, Brian C. Callaghan, MD, MS3, Lindsay Colbert, MA4, William S. David, MD, PhD5, Mary Dolan O’Brien, MLIS6, Kenneth Fink, MD, MPH7, Gary Franklin, MD, MPH8, Gary Gronseth, MD9, John Halperin, MD10, Lawrence B. Harkless, DPM11, Leslie Levine, PhD, VMD, JD12, Nicole Licking, DO13, Bruce A. Perkins, MD, MPH14, Michael Pignone, MD15, Raymond Price, MD16, Alexander Rae-Grant, MD17, Don Smith, MD18, Scott R. Wessels, MPS, ELS6 1. Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Israel 2. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, ON, Canada 3. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 4. The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy, Buffalo Grove, IL 5. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 6. American Academy of Neurology, Minneapolis, MN 7. Kamehameha Schools, Honolulu, HI 8. Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 9. Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 10. Department of Neurosciences, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ 11. Western University Health Sciences College of Podiatric Medicine, Pomona, CA 1 Draft for Public Comment 12. Neuropathy Action Foundation, Santa Ana, CA 13. New West Physicians, Golden, CO 14. Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON 15. Department of Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin 16. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordarone (Amiodarone Hydrochloride)
    Cordarone® (amiodarone HCl) TABLETS Rx only DESCRIPTION Cordarone (amiodarone HCl) is a member of a class of antiarrhythmic drugs with predominantly Class III (Vaughan Williams’ classification) effects, available for oral administration as pink, scored tablets containing 200 mg of amiodarone hydrochloride. The inactive ingredients present are colloidal silicon dioxide, lactose, magnesium stearate, povidone, starch, and FD&C Red 40. Cordarone is a benzofuran derivative: 2-butyl-3­ benzofuranyl 4-[2-(diethylamino)-ethoxy]-3,5-diiodophenyl ketone hydrochloride. The structural formula is as follows: Amiodarone HCl is a white to cream-colored crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water, soluble in alcohol, and freely soluble in chloroform. It contains 37.3% iodine by weight. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Electrophysiology/Mechanisms of Action In animals, Cordarone is effective in the prevention or suppression of experimentally induced arrhythmias. The antiarrhythmic effect of Cordarone may be due to at least two major properties: 1. a prolongation of the myocardial cell-action potential duration and refractory period and 2. noncompetitive α- and β-adrenergic inhibition. Cordarone prolongs the duration of the action potential of all cardiac fibers while causing minimal reduction of dV/dt (maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential). The refractory period is prolonged in all cardiac tissues. Cordarone increases the cardiac refractory period without influencing resting membrane potential, except in automatic cells where the slope of the prepotential is reduced, generally reducing automaticity. These electrophysiologic effects are reflected in a decreased sinus rate of 15 to 20%, increased PR and QT intervals of about 10%, the development of U-waves, and changes in T-wave contour.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia with Encainide: Reversal of Drug Effect with Isoproterenol
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector 904 JACC Vol. 13, No. 4 March 15, 1989:904-10 Treatment of Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia With Encainide: Reversal of Drug Effect With Isoproterenol IMRAN NIAZI, MD, GERALD NACCARELLI, MD* ANN DOUGHERTY, MD,* ROBERT RINKENBERGER, MD,* PATRICK TCHOU, MD, MASOOD AKHTAR, MD, FACC Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Houston, Texas To determine the efficacy of encainide in the treatment of paced cycle length with 1:l ventriculoatrial conduction was atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia, Holter 337 f 56 ms in the control study, 551 t 124 ms with electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring, exercise treadmill encainide infusion (p < 0.01 versus control) and 354 f 72 testing and programmed electrical stimulation were per- ms during isoproterenol infusion in the encainide-loaded formed in 16 patients while they were taking no medication state (p < 0.01 versus both control and encainide). and after steady state levels were reached during treatment During a mean follow-up period of 19 + 10 months, with encainide (75 to 200 mg/day; mean 117 + 47). In significant clinical recurrences occurred in 4 of the 10 addition, to study the possible reversal of drug effects by patients in whom tachycardia could still be initiated with sympathetic stimulation, AV node conduction and tachy- encainide (with or without isoproterenol). In contrast, no cardia induction were reassessed during isoproterenol infu- significant episodes occurred in the six patients in whom sion (1 to 3 pg/min), a dose calculated to increase the rest tachycardia could not be induced with encainide despite heart rate by 25 + 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXITIL® (Mexiletine Hydrochloride, USP) Is an Orally Active Antiarrhythmic Agent Available As 150 Mg, 200 Mg and 250 Mg Capsules
    ® Mexitil (mexiletine hydrochloride, USP) Capsules of 150 mg, 200 mg and 250 mg Oral Antiarrhythmic Prescribing Information DESCRIPTION MEXITIL® (mexiletine hydrochloride, USP) is an orally active antiarrhythmic agent available as 150 mg, 200 mg and 250 mg capsules. 100 mg of mexiletine hydrochloride is equivalent to 83.31 mg of mexiletine base. It is a white to off-white crystalline powder with slightly bitter taste, freely soluble in water and in alcohol. MEXITIL has a pKa of 9.2. Chemically, MEXITIL is 1-methyl-2-(2, 6-xylyloxy) ethylamine hydrochloride and has the following structural formula: C11 H17 NO•HCl mexiletine hydrochloride, USP Mol. Wt. 215.73 (MEXITIL) MEXITIL capsules contain the following excipients: colloidal silicon dioxide, corn starch, magnesium stearate, titanium dioxide, gelatin, pharmaceutical glaze, simethicone, FD&C Red No. 40, and FD&C Blue No. 1; the MEXITIL 150 mg and 250 mg capsules also contain FD&C Yellow No. 10 and D&C Red No. 28. MEXITIL capsules may contain one or more of the following components: sodium lauryl sulfate, lecithin, shellac, and FD&C Blue No. 1 Aluminum Lake. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Mechanism of Action MEXITIL (mexiletine hydrochloride, USP) is a local anesthetic, antiarrhythmic agent, structurally similar to lidocaine, but orally active. In animal studies, MEXITIL has been shown to be effective in the suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias, including those induced by glycoside toxicity and coronary artery ligation. MEXITIL, like lidocaine, inhibits the inward sodium current, thus reducing the rate of rise of the action potential, Phase 0. MEXITIL decreased the effective refractory period (ERP) in Purkinje fibers.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications to Avoid in Long QT Syndrome
    Jackie Crawford Cardiac Inherited Disease Co-ordinator C/- Paediatric Cardiology; Level 3 Starship; Auckland City Hospital Private Bag 92024; Auckland Cardiac Inherited Disease Registry Phone: (09) 3074949 ext 23634 www.cidg.org Fax: (09) 6309877 Email: [email protected] Medications to be avoided, or requiring special caution, in people with Long QT syndrome This list includes medications which prolong the QT interval and is meant as a guide for people with Long QT syndrome, or acquired long QT interval from heart muscle disease, and their parents or guardians. It should not be seen as all inclusive. Those prescribing any medication to someone with Long QT syndrome should always check the drug specifications and contra-indications. The list has been compiled by review of publications and/or drug advice sheets provided with medications. Check also www.SADS.org and www.Torsades .org. Antibiotics Erythromycin, Clarithromycin, Gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Septrin/Bactrim), Spiramycin, Pentamidine Antihistamines Terfenadine, Astemizole, Diphenhydramine, (These are particularly to be avoided (even in normal subjects) in combination with Erythromycin or grapefruit juice or the antifungals ketoconazole, miconazole, fluconazole or itraconazole) [Antihistamines that may be used safely are loratidine, cetirizine and fexofenadine, and phenergan] Appetite suppressants Fenfluramine, phentermine, Sibutramine Asthma treatments The Beta-2 agonists (e.g. Terbutaline, Salbutamol, Salmeterol) both work against
    [Show full text]
  • Get in Rhythm with the Safe and Effective Use of Antiarrythmic Drugs
    Get in Rhythm with the Safe and Effective Use of Antiarrythmic Drugs Karen J. McConnell, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCPS- AQ Cardiology, ASH-CHC Clinical Director and Cardiology Subject Matter Expert, Cardinal Health Clinical Associate Professor, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Shannon W. Finks, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCPS- AQ Cardiology, ASH-CHC Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy Clinical Specialist Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Memphis Disclosure The program chair and presenters for this continuing education activity have reported no relevant financial relationships. Objectives . Design patient-specific treatment and monitoring plans for antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) . Differentiate among appropriate monitoring strategies for various agents used in ventricular arrhythmia suppression . Avoid potential adverse drug events with AADs by identifying important drug interactions . Ensure safe and effective dosing of AADs based upon specific patient factors Rhythm Rule #1 . Pharmacists play a vital role in the appropriate use of AAD dosing, adverse effects, interactions, and monitoring. Treatment and Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation • Most common type of serious arrhythmia • In U.S., affects 2-5 million patients • Frequently seen with comorbidities • AF complicates management of comorbidity • Comorbidity complicates management of AF • Associated with stroke, heart failure, death • Most common arrhythmia requiring hospitalization Case #1: Mary Rhythm 60 y/o AA woman with a PMH including . Laboratory data: HFrEF (EF 35%), atrial fibrillation(AF), CKD, 140 110 18 HTN 105 . Inpatient Medications: 4.7 22 1.6 apixaban 5 mg twice daily lisinopril 20 mg daily BP 115/78 mm Hg HT 67 in metoprolol succinate 50 mg/day HR 70 bpm WT 75 kg furosemide 40 mg twice daily spironolactone 25 mg/day .
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Encainide-Induced Hypoproteinemia
    Possible Encainide-Induced Hypoproteinemia Lawrence L. Perry, MD, and Michael A. Oszko, PharmD Kansas City, Kansas ncainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that is ular ejection fraction was determined to be 29%. An at­ Eused in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tempt to lyse the right coronary artery occlusion using arrhythmias. Although a number of minor laboratory ab­ both intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase was un­ normalities have been reported with encainide therapy,1’2 successful. hypoproteinemia has not been among them. Reported In the coronary care unit, the patient was noted to have here is a case of hypoproteinemia and associated pedal frequent premature ventricular contractions and couplets, edema that developed in a patient during encainide ther­ He was placed on mexiletine; however, this treatment apy. The hypoproteinemia may be associated with encain­ failed to reduce the number of premature ventricular con­ ide therapy, since other causes of hypoproteinemia were tractions. The mexiletine was discontinued, and he was ruled out, and the patient’s edema resolved within 1 to 2 subsequently placed on encainide, 25 mg every 8 hours, weeks of the termination of the drug. which resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of premature ventricular contractions. A 24-hour Holter ECG revealed only occasional premature ventricular con­ CASE REPORT tractions, no complex arrhythmias, and an episode of asymptomatic bradycardia (46 beats per minute). In addi­ tion, the patient was noted to have a low blood pressure, A 53-year-old man was admitted to the hospital on Octo­ though he remained asymptomatic. ber 15, 1987, with a chief complaint of “indigestion.” The patient was discharged on October 26, 1987, on Earlier in the day, he noted that his substemal discomfort encainide, 25 mg every 8 hours, aspirin 325 mg daily, and became more severe and was associated with diaphoresis, sublingual nitroglycerin as needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Egdb1de1.Pdf
    1 2 A todos los que me han dado la fuerza y la ilusión para llegar aquí A mis padres, hermanas y Ricard, por su cariño, sus cuidados y su ejemplo, sin vosotros no hubiese sido posible. A Iñaki, porque cuando te fuiste, te llevaste parte de mi vida, pero lo vivido me acompañará siempre, y tu recuerdo me ayuda a ser mejor. 3 4 EVALUATION OF CARDIOTOXICITY OF RUPATADINE, AN ANTIHISTAMINE, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ICH E14 AIMS: To evaluate the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of rupatadine on cardiac repolarization in line with a 'thorough QT/QTc study' protocol performed according to International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. METHODS: This was a randomized (gender-balanced), parallel-group study involving 160 healthy volunteers. Rupatadine, 10 and 100 mg od, and placebo were administered single- blind for 5 days, whilst moxifloxacin 400 mg/day was given on days 1 and 5 in open- label fashion. ECGs were recorded over a 23-h period by continuous Holter monitoring at baseline and on treatment days 1 and 5. Three 10-s ECG samples were downloaded at regular intervals and were analysed independently. The primary analysis of QTc was based on individually corrected QT (QTcI). Treatment effects on QTcI were assessed using the largest time-matched mean difference between the drug and placebo (baseline-subtracted) for the QTcI interval. A negative 'thorough QT/QTc study' is one where the main variable is around < or =5 ms, with a one-sided 95% confidence interval that excludes an effect >10 ms. RESULTS: The validity of the trial was confirmed by the fact that the moxifloxacin-positive control group produced the expected change in QTcI duration (around 5 ms).
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for Antiarrhythmic Drug Interactions with the Human Cardiac Sodium Channel
    Structural basis for antiarrhythmic drug interactions with the human cardiac sodium channel Phuong T. Nguyena,b, Kevin R. DeMarcoa,b, Igor Vorobyova,c, Colleen E. Clancya,c,1, and Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoya,1 aDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; bBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and cDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Edited by Richard W. Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved January 9, 2019 (received for review October 10, 2018) – The human voltage-gated sodium channel, hNaV1.5, is responsible opening (7 9). This inactivation process plays critical roles in NaV for the rapid upstroke of the cardiac action potential and is target channel function and drug binding (10, 11). for antiarrhythmic therapy. Despite the clinical relevance of hNaV1.5- Forty years ago, Hille (12) proposed two distinct access path- targeting drugs, structure-based molecular mechanisms of promising ways for local anesthetics to the central binding site: the hydro- or problematic drugs have not been investigated at atomic scale to phobic pathway through the membrane and the hydrophilic inform drug design. Here, we used Rosetta structural modeling and pathway through the intracellular gate. Many antiarrhythmic and docking as well as molecular dynamics simulations to study the in- local anesthetic drugs are weak bases that exist in equilibrium teractions of antiarrhythmic and local anesthetic drugs with hNaV1.5. between both neutral and charged forms at physiological pH. These calculations revealed several key drug binding sites formed Neutral drugs may access the pore lumen binding site through within the pore lumen that can simultaneously accommodate up to both hydrophobic and hydrophilic pathways (13), but charged two drug molecules.
    [Show full text]