DOCSLIB.ORG

Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details RETURN MIGRATION TO THE CAUCASUS: THE ADYGE-ABKHAZ DIASPORA(S), TRANSNATIONALISM AND LIFE AFTER RETURN Jade Cemre Erciyes A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Sussex for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in MIGRATION STUDIES SCHOOL OF GLOBAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Brighton, UK, January 2014 DECLARATION I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS THESIS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED, EITHER IN THE SAME OR DIFFERENT FORM, TO THIS OR ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY FOR A DEGREE. SIGNATURE: JADE CEMRE ERCIYES For all those who are searching for their belonging in the Caucasian mountains… and in memory of the ones who found it there... DEGUF SABAHAT BAYBAS LUGON 8 April 1934 – 27 January 2012 2 October 2011, on our way from Abkhazia to Adygeya, Deguf Sabahat is telling about what she learned as a child – the three things that makes a person Adyge: Kheku (the homeland), Khabze (the etiquette) and the Bze (language). Sabahat was not only an Adyge by her deep connection to her ancestral homeland, etiquette and language, but she was also the symbol of a transnational life that awaits a whole new generation of Adyge-Abkhaz people, living between her homes in Turkey, Switzerland, Adygeya and Abkhazia, in between modernity and traditions, in complete freedom of soul and body, travelling far and beyond but always finding parts of herself in the Caucasian mountains. RETURN MIGRATION TO THE CAUCASUS: THE ADYGE-ABKHAZ DIASPORA(S), TRANSNATIONALISM AND LIFE AFTER RETURN Jade Cemre Erciyes University of Sussex PhD Migration Studies Abstract This thesis investigates the dual transnationalism of ancestral return migrants, that is to say people “returning” to the territory where their ancestors had once migrated from. Dispersed from their homeland in the second half of the 19th century, the Adyge-Abkhaz diaspora has been involved in a variety of transnational practices in relation to their homeland in the Caucasus; and some, with considerable effort, have been settling there especially in the last two decades. The transnational involvement of this diaspora, most of whom live today in Turkey, is motivated by their search for belonging. Many who go back and forth between Turkey and the Caucasus are involved in transnational diaspora associations and take an active role in the formation of a transnational ethno-political-cultural environment for new generations growing up in the diaspora. The majority of those who have “return migrated” to their homeland in the Caucasus, in this study to two republics, Adygeya (an autonomous republic under the Russian Federation) and Abkhazia (a republic with contested independence), develop new transnational links to their diaspora communities in Turkey. This thesis is the product of a multi-sited, multi-method research project that combines theories related to transnationalism, diaspora and return, as well as migrant adaptation. Using life-history interviews, semi-structured interviews and participant observation, fieldwork for the research took place in rural diaspora settlements and urban diaspora organisations in Turkey as well as in the Caucasus, thereby enabling the researcher to study both ends of the migration route. Existing studies on ancestral return migration focus on pull and push factors, which hitherto have focused on sending and receiving countries separately. This thesis argues that their dual transnationalism, both in the diaspora (in Turkey) looking back towards the diasporic homeland, and after return looking back towards the diaspora, turns them into the “diaspora of their diaspora”. Table of Contents DECLARATION.........................................................................................................................i Dedication...................................................................................................................................ii Abstract......................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................iv List of figures ..........................................................................................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................1 1.1 Research Questions .....................................................................................................3 1.2 The Framework: Dual Transnationalism ....................................................................4 1.2.1 Transnationalism .................................................................................................6 1.2.2 Diaspora...............................................................................................................7 1.2.2.1 Classical Definitions and Critiques ................................................................8 1.2.2.2 Transnationalism of the Diaspora...................................................................9 1.2.3 Return ................................................................................................................11 1.2.3.1 Transnationalism and Return..........................................................................13 1.2.4 Post-Return Processes .......................................................................................13 1.2.5 Dual Transnationalism ......................................................................................15 1.3 Overview of the Thesis .............................................................................................17 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND...............................................................................................20 2.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................20 2.2 Caucasian History .....................................................................................................21 2.2.1 Abkhaz Kingdom ..............................................................................................22 2.2.2 Circassia/Cherkessia..........................................................................................22 2.2.3 Hundred Year Wars...........................................................................................23 2.2.4 Exile...................................................................................................................25 2.3 Diaspora ....................................................................................................................27 2.3.1 Life in the Ottoman Empire and the Young Republic of Turkey......................28 2.3.2 First and Second-Generation Attempts to Return .............................................29 2.3.3 Diasporisation: Urbanisation and the “Dernek”................................................30 2.3.4 Third and Fourth-Generations “Returnist” Movement .....................................33 2.3.5 First Visits to the Homeland (1970s) ................................................................34 2.4 Adygeya ....................................................................................................................35 iv 2.4.1 Borders and People............................................................................................36 2.4.2 Laws and Regulations on Return.......................................................................36 2.5 Abkhazia ...................................................................................................................37 2.5.1 Borders and People............................................................................................37 2.5.2 Laws and Regulations on Return.......................................................................38 2.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................40 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND FIELDWORK CONTEXT......................................42 3.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................42 3.2 Choice of Field Sites .................................................................................................45 3.2.1 Choice of Field Sites in the Caucasian “Homeland”.........................................45 3.2.2 Choice of Field Sites in Turkey.........................................................................46 3.2.2.1 Ankara........................................................................................................47 3.2.2.2 Istanbul ......................................................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Language Situation Among the Circassians of Jordan
    Educational Research (ISSN: 2141-5161) Vol. 4(8) pp. 612-617, August, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/er.2013.113 Available online@ http://www.interesjournals.org/ER Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper The Language situation among the Circassians of Jordan Doa ʾa F. Al-Momani*1 and Siham M. Al-Momani *1Al Balqa' Applied University (Jordan) 2Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Al Balqa' Applied University (Jordan) *Corresponding Author`s E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we examine the language situation among the Circassians of Jordan within the framework of previous theories on language maintenance and shift as proposed by Fishman. The study investigates factors influencing the sample responses toward importance and usefulness of the Arabic and Circassian languages. Convenience sample include 100 subject selected by five in group persons. Data collected by means of a questionnaire developed and used by previous investigators. Results indicate that Arabic is used by the respondents for various functions and Circasssian is used in very restricted social domains. Evidence is represented that the overwhelming majority of the Circassians agree that it is important for them to speak in both Arabic as a means of communication, and Circassian as an important symbol of their identity. These results indicate that the Circassians of Jordan are experiencing a process of language shift which appears to be in its initial position, as most of them appear to be less proficient in their language. They also indicate that the younger generation (forty years or below) of Circassians show a stronger tendency toward shifting their speech than the older generation (forty years or above).
    [Show full text]
  • Içindekiler /Contents
    TEHLİKEDEKİ DİLLER DERGİSİ - TÜRK DİLLERİ (TDD) JOURNAL OF ENDANGERED LANGUAGES - TURKIC LANGUAGES (JofEL) Cilt / Volume 11, Sayı / Issue 18, Kış / Winter 2021 Yılda iki kez yayımlanan, az konuşurlu Türk toplulukları ve komşu/akraba topluluklarla ilgili dilbilim, toplumdilbilim, antropoloji ve kültüroloji yazılarına açık uluslararası hakemli elektronik dergi. Dergimize gönderilen makalelerin özgün ve yayımlanmamış olduğunu garanti etmek yazarların sorumluluğundadır. An international peer-reviewed and bi-annual e-journal publishing linguistic, sociolinguistic, anthropological and culturological studies on the lesser spoken languages of the Turkic and related communities. It is the authors' responsibility to ensure that submitted manuscripts are original and unpublished. Sahibi ve Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü / Owner And Managing Editor Ülkü Çelik Şavk & Süer Eker Yayım Dilleri / Publishing Languages Türkçe, İngilizce (Rusça, Türk dilleri) / Turkish, English (Russian, Turkic languages) İletişim / Contact www.tehlikedekidiller.com • www.dergipark.gov.tr/tdd Yayım Kurulu / Editorial Board Ülkü ÇELİK ŞAVK, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Emekli Öğretim Üyesi • Süer EKER, Başkent Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü • Marcel ERDAL, Goethe Üniversitesi, Emekli Öğretim Üyesi • Aydan IRGATOĞLU, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi, Türkiye. Gökçe Yükselen PELER, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Türkiye. Yayın Kurulu Yardımcıları Tolga ÇAKMAK, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü, Türkiye • Nur Sena TAŞÇI, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye • Onur TARLACI • Saffet YILMAZ, Azerbaycan Bilimler Akademisi, Azerbaycan. İngilizce Editörü Aydan IRGATOĞLU, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi, Türkiye. İngilizce Editör Yardımcısı Betül Hazal DİNÇER, Başkent Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, İngilizce Mütercim Tercümanlık Programı, Türkiye. Danışma Kurulu/Advisory Board Ali ASKER • Ingeborg BALDAUF • Çiğdem BALIM • Yuliya BLETSKA • Aziyana BAYYR-OOL • Daniel CHATHAM • Mariya D. Çertıkova • Han Woo CHOI • Magripa ESKEYEVA • Éva Á.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalizing Political Participation AYHAN KAYA
    ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Circassian Claims to Equal Citizenship in Turkey: Institutionalizing Political Participation Ayhan Kaya Istanbul Bilgi University 2012/12 4. National Case Studies - Political Life Final Country Reports EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Circassian Claims to Equal Citizenship in Turkey: Institutionalizing Political Participation AYHAN KAYA ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Work Package 4 – National Case Studies of Challenges to Tolerance in Political Life D4.1 Final Country Reports on Concepts and Practices of Tolerance Addressing Cultural Diversity in Political Life iii Ayhan Kaya © 2012 Ayhan Kaya This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the research project, the year and the publisher. Published by the European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Via dei Roccettini 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole - Italy ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project, Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe European Commission, DG Research Seventh Framework Programme Social Sciences and Humanities grant agreement no. 243837 www.accept-pluralism.eu www.eui.eu/RSCAS/ Available from the EUI institutional repository CADMUS cadmus.eui.eu iv Circassian Claims to Equal Citizenship in Turkey: Institutionalizing Political Participation Tolerance , Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe (ACCEPT PLURALISM) ACCEPT PLURALISM is a Research Project funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS 315 Nationalism and Identity
    POLITICS 315 Nationalism and Identity Course syllabus Course coordinator: Dr James Headley Semester 2 2014 Course description This course explores the major debates and themes in the study of nations and nationalism. The first half of the course examines the notion of identity, the concepts of nation and ethnicity, the origins of nations and nationalism, and the historical development of nationalism from the nineteenth century to the post-Cold War period. The second half of the course examines contemporary debates about nationalism, including the basis of national identity, national identity in an international context, poly-ethnic and multinational states, and self-determination and secession. A variety of examples from around the world are used to illustrate. Course details Lecturer: Dr James Headley Office Hours: Mon 2-3, Thurs 1-2 (or by appointment) Room 4S1, 4th Floor, Arts Building Tel: 479 8616 Email: [email protected] Lectures and tutorials: There are two lectures per week, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:00-10:50am. The lectures are designed to give an introduction to the main themes and issues of the course. They combine theoretical and empirical analysis of nationalism and associated issues, using a range of examples. I will give a skeletal handout for each lecture, but it is up to you to take relevant notes. Sometimes it may be necessary to complete the topic of a lecture in the following lecture as they do not always fit conveniently into 50-minute time slots. There will also be one tutorial per week (times/groups to be arranged), starting week two, for student-centred discussion and debate of readings relating to topics covered in the lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • CIRCASSIANS of UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY Eiji
    MEMORY POLITICS: CIRCASSIANS OF UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY Eiji Miyazawa A dissertation submitted for the degree of PhD. Department of Anthropology and Sociology Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Oriental and African Studies University of London MEMORY POLITICS: CIRCASSIANS OF UZUNYAYLA, TURKEY BY EIJI MIYAZAWA ABSTRACT This thesis explores social memories among Circassians in Turkey. It is based on eighteen months’ field research in the Uzunyayla plateau, Pınarbaşı district of Kayseri province, central Turkey. The Circassians (Çerkez) settled there are the descendants of refugees who fled from the Russian invasion of the Caucasus in the mid nineteenth century. “Memory” here is used in a broad sense to include the experiences and expressions of historical consciousness in everyday interactions, as well as articulated historical narratives. By interweaving them, the present work aims to analyse the political process involved in the production of knowledge about history and society. In efforts to reproduce a community in their new homeland, Circassians emphasise their history and collective identity. The local elites from noble (worq) families dominate such conservative, essentialist discourses, stressing their status superiority over ex-slave families. They recognise historical significance and identify the driving forces of their history by reference to specific social themes, such as the opposition between the two status groups. They monopolise history as a resource by excluding ex-slaves from the production of authoritative knowledge. Here, memory politics, consisting of space construction, control over interpersonal exchanges, and hierarchized personhood, plays a crucial role. In that process, ex-slaves become muted, made passively to embody a “feudal” past. By contrast, in Karakuyu, an affluent village also known as “Slave Village”, male comrades produce social relations different from elite representations by committing themselves to alcohol drinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing the Nation in the North Caucasus
    _______________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES Dancing the Nation in the North Caucasus Sufi an Zhemukhov and Charles King In the realm of nations and nationalism, what are the limits of invention? With the upsurge in writing on Eurasian and east European nation building, we now know a great deal about the formulation and remaking of national categories, from the work of state-sponsored ethnographers to the struggle be- tween incumbent and oppositional politicians.1 Yet the persistent challenge, to paraphrase Karl Marx, is to understand exactly how and why people are unable to make their histories just as they please. Even though traditions may be invented and communities imagined, it is no simple task to identify the specifi c moments when these phenomena actually occur, especially when the inventing and imagining are not the mere result of government fi at or ethno- graphic creativity. Moreover, in our enthusiasm for deconstructing national belonging, it is easy to lose sight of the ways in which large numbers of people perform the ethnonational categories that scholars now assiduously unbuild. How might we map those precise points in time when decisions about national forms get negotiated by actors with little to gain from the process—apart from, so far as we can tell, a sincere wish to be somehow true to a collectively imag- ined past? What is at stake—culturally, historically, and even politically— when people decide to “do being ethnic” in one way and not another, and all within the context of a globalized, post-Soviet world? 2 There is no clearer illustration of these phenomena than what might be called ethnokinetics, that is, forms of human motion that are locally catego- rized as essential to collective belonging—from “ethnic dance,” to the forms of posture thought to be exemplary of a particular ethnonational category, to virtually any collective performance that valorizes bodies in motion.
    [Show full text]
  • RETURN of the CIRCASSIAN WORLD: MAY the FORCE BE with YOU Written for the Return of the Circassian World Website on January 2018 by Jade Cemre Erciyes
    RETURN OF THE CIRCASSIAN WORLD: MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU written for the return of the Circassian World Website on January 2018 by Jade Cemre Erciyes When Metin Sönmez, the renowned creator of the CircassianWorld and AbkhazWorld Websites, besides many others, asked me to write an article for the return of the CircassianWorld by the beginning of 2018, after a break of more than 4, I got very excited. There were so many things to tell about what it meant for me in the past, what it means for me today, and what it will mean for academics, researchers or journalists working on the Circassian people the moment it becomes online. It is not that easy to start writing this article from its main topic for various reasons. First of all, someone, not much knowledgeable about Circassians may be reading this piece. Besides, I do not want to just narrate a self-reflexive story or a list of key points acknowledging the value of the CircassianWorld. I decided to design this paper as a resource for researchers who may, one day, be interested in the development of the Circassian scholarship. To reflect upon this, it is important for me to start with a short introduction about the earliest works on the Circassian people and the Caucasus1. This is followed by a short review of works focusing on the diasporisation of the Circassians – or in other words, the events of the 19th Century2. This part is a response to a question that I frequently hear in the diaspora which I had been meaning to write for a long time (and I do in my forthcoming book in Turkish).
    [Show full text]
  • New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History Through Turkish Village Web-Sites
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-27-2011 New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History through Turkish Village Web-Sites Musemma Sabancioglu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Sabancioglu, Musemma, "New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History through Turkish Village Web-Sites." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/48 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW CUSTOM FOR THE OLD VILLAGE INTERPRETING HISTORY THROUGH TURKISH VILLAGE WEB-SITES by MÜSEMMA SABANCIOĞLU Under the Direction of Isa Blumi ABSTRACT It is estimated that there are 35.000 villages in Turkey, and a great number of them have their own unofficial web-sites created as a result of individual efforts. The individuals who prepare these web-sites try to connect with the world via the internet, and represent their past with limited information. Pages on these web-sites that are titled "our history" or "our short history" provide some unique historical, cultural, and anthropological information about the villager's life in rural area. This thesis examines amateur historians' methods of reinterpretation in
    [Show full text]
  • Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-Years After the Fall of the Soviet Union
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 11, No 2, 2012, 103-135 Copyright © ECMI 21 December 2012 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/publications/detail/issue-22012-vol-11-254/ Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-years after the Fall of the Soviet Union Lars Funch Hansen* University of Copenhagen The renewed ethnic mobilization among Circassians in the North Caucasus region in Russia that has unfolded since the latter half of the 2000s is illustrated by the establishment of new civil society organizations and a substantially increased number of internet-based initiatives. All of this reflects a new and increased form of agency and unity among the Circassians in which youth activism has played key role. It also illustrates how Circassian civil society actors and cyber-activists have not only been able to establish a counter-public sphere or develop a new space for action, but also increasingly have been able to move key issues from Circassian spheres into the wider public sphere of mainstream Russian media and politics. The upcoming 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, in particular, has functioned as a lever in this process, which has also resulted in increasing support among Circassians for calls for recognition of the nineteenth century forced expulsion of the majority of the Circassians from the Caucasus as an act of genocide. In this manner, a mega-event such as the Sochi Olympics has contributed to generating a more radical or politicized understanding or framing of the Caucasian exodus that, since the fall of the Soviet Union, has generally been known as “our national tragedy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Circassians Development in Jordan 1870-2010
    Circassians Language (Adighabza) Development in Jordan 1870-2010 Dr. Moh'd Yacoub Khawaj Jordan Environmental Studies Centre P.O.Box 5689 Amman 11183 Jordan Email: [email protected] Ürdün’de Çerkesçe (Adiğabaza) Gelişimi 1870 – 2010 Yılları Arasında Dr. Moh'd Yacoub Khawaj Jordan Environmental Studies Centre, P.O.Box 5689 Amman 11183 Jordan Email: [email protected] Settling in Jordan: Circassians* arrived to Jordan in the late 1860's coming from there homeland in North Caucasus, after they lost the unbalanced war with the Russians, who intended to occupy the Caucasus for longtime. (The term “Circassian” is a term which I refer to: the people of North Caucasus as known in Turkish, were majority of Circassians out of homeland are; Shapsugh, Abzakh, Kabardians, Bjadugh, Ubykhs, Hatukuay, Adamey, Kemirgoy, Makhosh, Natekuay, Jana, Yegerikuay, Abazin, Abkhaz, Shashan and Daghistans). Ürdündeki ilk Çerkes yerleşimleri Çerkesler**, yıllardır Kafkasya’yı işgal etme niyetinde olan Ruslar’a karşı verdikleri eşitsiz koşullardaki savaşı kaybettikten sonra, anavatanları olan Kuzey Kafkasya’dan göç etmek zorunda kalarak, 1860’ların sonlarında Ürdün’e ulaştılar. ** Burada “Çerkes” kavramını, Türkçe’de kullanıldığı biçimiyle, Kuzey Kafkasya halklarını kapsayacak biçimde kullanıyorum. Anayurt dışındaki Çerkesler’in büyük büyük çoğunluğunu Şapsığlar, Bjeduğlar, Abzehler, Adameyler, Hatkuaylar, Kemirgoylar, Makhoşlar, Nathuaclar, Janeler, Yecerikuaylar, Kabardeyler, Abhazlar, Abazinler, Vubıhlar, Çeçenler, ve Dağıstanlılar oluşturmaktadır. • Settling In Summary: Circassians settled in Jordan, they settled in Amman and Suburbs, within 50 km distance, most of them spoke their native language with different dialects. Kabardian Dialect were dominant in Amman, Jerash, Suweileh and Russeifa. Bjadough Dialect were dominant in Wadi Essir and Naur. Nohchi Dialect were dominant among Shashans Yerleşim Özeti Özet olarak, Çerkesler’in Ürdün’de Amman ve çevresinde, su kaynaklarına 50 kilometre kadar mesafede yerlere yerleştikleri söylenebilir.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Kabarda
    A Brief History of Kabarda [from the Seventh Century AD] Amjad Jaimoukha T he Russians have been writing Kabardian (and Circassian) history according to their colonial prescriptions for more than a century, ever since they occupied Circassia in the middle years of the 19th century. Simplistic and oftentimes ridiculous accounts of this history were produced in the course of this time. Until this day, these historiographies, with added clauses to reduce the level of inanity and circumvent the rampant contradictions, constitute the official historical narrative in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic (and with slight variations in the other ‘Circassian’ republics, namely the Karachai-Cherkess Republic and the Republic of Adigea). For one, the Kabardians were deemed to have opted to join Russia in the 16th century (much more on this ‘Union’ in the course of this article). In 1957, big celebrations were held in Kabarda commemorating the 400th anniversary of the ‘joyful’ event that saved the Kabardians from perdition. A statue was erected as a symbol of the fictitious union of Kabarda with Russia in downtown Nalchik. The Circassian maiden with an uplifted scroll is exquisite Gwascheney (or Gwaschene; Гуащэней, е Гуащэнэ), daughter of Temryuk Idar (Teimriqwe Yidar; Идар и къуэ Темрыкъуэ), who was betrothed to Ivan IV (1530-1584) on 21 August 1561 AD, to cement the treaty between Temryuk, Prince of Princes of Kabarda, and Ivan the Terrible, ‘Tsar of All Russia’.1 Tsarina Maria Temryukovna (Мария Темрюковна; 1544-1569), as was Gwascheney 1 The corresponding monument amongst the Western Circassians (Adigeans) was built in 1957 in Friendship Square in Maikop, the republican capital, “in honour of the 400th anniversary of the ‘Military and Political Union’ between the Russian State and Circassia”.
    [Show full text]
  • Svetlana KUDAEVA the Circassian (Adyge)
    Svetlana KUDAEVA The Circassian (Adyge) Scattering in the Countries of the Middle East: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Diasporality Studies (Based on the Example of the Classic Jewish Diaspora) Svetlana KUDAEVA Maikop State Technological University, Maikop, Russian Federation Abstract. As of today, the Circassian (Adyge) diaspora counts according to the minimum data for around 3 million people. The areas of its compact settlement are Turkey, Syria, and Jordan. This situation has developed in the course of the mass migration of the Adyge to the Ottoman Empire in the XIX century during the Caucasian war. The manuscript presents a comparative analysis of the most known methods for studying "classic" Diasporas (their invariant component). Also, there was an attempt to adapt them in relation to the Circassian (Adyge) diaspora (variative component of the method), i.e. rather adequate approaches to studying the Circassian (Adyge) diaspora have been worked out. The author represents the main results of multi-year research on the history of formation and development of the Circassian (Adyge) diaspora in the countries of the Middle East in short. Keywords: Russia, North-West Caucasus, the Ottoman Empire, Turkey, Middle East, the Circassian (Adyge), the Jewish diaspora. Introduction The Circassians (Adyge)1 of the North-West Caucasus belong to the amount of the people, who became the national minority at their historic homeland. Currently, the Circassian (Adyge) ethnic group involves more than a three million people diaspora, while a little more than seven hundred thousand of them (the Adyge, the Circassian, and the Kabardians) live at their historic homeland. The areas of compact settlements of the Adyge abroad are Turkey, Syria, and Jordan.
    [Show full text]