DOCSLIB.ORG

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E780 HON

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

E780 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks May 10, 2006 this capacity since May 2004 and he will soon our visit many of the incarcerated had been brain cancer after waiting years for Soviet au- be accepting command of the 6th Marine released and by 1991 the camp had emptied thorities to give her permission to leave the Regiment at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. out completely in the closing chapter of the Soviet Union for specialized treatment abroad, Through his assignment as the Marine USSR. As Co-Chairman of the Helsinki Com- a reminder of the personal costs to human Corps Liaison Officer to the House, Colonel mission, I can vividly recall that glimpse into rights activists and their families under a cruel Simcock has been an invaluable link between life in the Soviet GULag, both a memorable regime. Members of Congress and the Marine Corps. and sobering experience. But the Helsinki spirit lived on. In the West, He has coordinated and accompanied con- I mention that trip because Friday of this supporters and sympathizers demonstrated on gressional delegations to places such as Iraq week, May 12, will mark the 30th anniversary behalf on imprisoned Helsinki Monitors. The and Afghanistan, organized and contributed to of the founding of the Moscow Helsinki Group, cases of imprisoned or exiled Helsinki Mon- meetings between Members of Congress and a leading human rights organization devoted itors were often raised at diplomatic meetings key leaders of the Marine Corps, and worked to monitoring the Kremlin’s adherence to the between the United States and the Soviet au- to ensure that Members are kept fully in- Helsinki Final Act of 1975. The Helsinki Final thorities. In the Soviet Union itself, enlightened formed of the programs vital to the Corps’ Act was signed by the United States, Canada leaders began to understand that repressive operability. and thirty-three European countries, including governments may squelch the voices of dis- As Chairman of the House Armed Services the Soviet Union. While much of this docu- senters for a time, but their message will Committee, I have worked directly with Colo- ment was focused on military security, eco- heard by other means. nel Simcock on many Committee-related nomics and trade, there were important provi- And on February 14, 1987, less than 5 issues. We have come to rely on his candid il- sions on human rights and humanitarian years after the Moscow Helsinki group was lustrations and knowledge of the Marine Corps issues, such as freedom of conscience and forced to suspend its activities, a small item in and, over the last two years, Colonel Simcock family reunification, which the Soviet Govern- ‘‘Izvestiya’’ announced the possibility of certain has been an important part of our efforts to ment and the other signatories promised to prisoners being released from labor camp. It identify the priorities and address the chal- uphold. was the beginning of the end for the repres- lenges facing the Corps. At a May 12, 1976, Moscow press con- sive Soviet system. Mr. Speaker, the men and women of the ference organized by Nobel Peace Prize Lau- In July 1989, the Moscow Helsinki Group Marine Corps have been called to action and reate Dr. Andrei Sakharov, the Moscow Hel- was reestablished by several longtime human tasked with confronting unconventional adver- sinki Group announced that it would collect in- rights activists: Larisa Bogoraz, Sergey saries in the operational theaters of the global formation and publish reports on implementa- Kovalev, Viatcheslav Bakhmin, Alexey war on terrorism. In Iraq, they are fighting cou- tion of the Helsinki Accords by the Soviet Gov- Smirnov, Lev Timofeev, and Boris Zolotukhin. rageously and continue to provide developing ernment. The initiator of this effort was Dr. Today, Ludmilla Alexeyeva, who had been ex- security forces with quality instruction and Yuri Orlov, a physicist who had already been iled to the United States by Soviet authorities training. However, as the Marines have ad- repressed by the Kremlin and the KGB for his for her earlier work, now chairs this respected justed and developed new tactics to success- human rights activism. Orlov was joined by ten organization. fully combat the Iraqi insurgency, Congress other founding members; with time others Mr. Speaker, 30 years after its founding and has responded by ensuring these brave men joined in the group. 15 years after the collapse of the Soviet and women have the operating and protective As might be expected, the Soviet Govern- Union, the re-established Moscow Helsinki equipment necessary to accomplish their mis- ment did not welcome this initiative. Members Group remains active in speaking out in de- sion. In doing so, we have utilized the insight were threatened by the KGB, imprisoned, ex- fense of human rights, civil society, and rule of of Colonel Simcock and his ability to open ef- iled or forced to emigrate. The Soviet press law in Russia. I congratulate the members of fective communication channels between Con- went into full-scale attack mode, accusing the the Moscow Helsinki Group for their achieve- gress and the Marine Corps. Moscow Helsinki Group of being subversive ments in the past and pledge my support for Colonel Simcock is greatly respected as an and charging that some members were on the their vital ongoing work. officer and leader who possesses a deep and payroll of foreign intelligence services. I might f abiding passion for what it means to be a Ma- mention that a thinly veiled version of this ca- rine: unquestionable devotion to duty; impec- nard against the group was recently resur- RECOGNIZING JARED GOEDE cable integrity; and sound character. His ef- rected by a representative of the KGB’s suc- forts will have a long lasting impression on the cessor, the FSB, on national television. HON. SAM GRAVES Marine Corps and I know he will serve the 6th Arrests of members of the Moscow Group OF MISSOURI Marine Regiment with the same level of dedi- began within a year of its founding. In 1978, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Dr. Orlov himself was sentenced to 7 years cation and selflessness he demonstrated while Wednesday, May 10, 2006 serving this House. labor camp and 5 years internal exile. In 1986, Mr. Speaker, it is with the greatest sense of he was brought back to Moscow, put on a Mr. GRAVES. Mr. Speaker, I proudly rise to appreciation that I salute Colonel Simcock for plane and deported to the United States in ex- recognize Jared Goede of Kansas City, Mis- his tireless work and outstanding leadership change for a Soviet spy. Other Moscow Hel- souri. Jared will be honored with the Billy on such important issues and I wish both him sinki Group members found themselves at the Mitchell Award and Second Lieutenant Bars and his wife, Mary, continued success in their notorious Perm Labor Camp complex that I as a member of the Platte Valley Civil Air Pa- future endeavors. mentioned earlier. For his criticism of the 1979 trol. He has been a member of the Civil Air f Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Dr. Sakharov Patrol since 2004 and has been involved in was exiled to the closed city of Gorky begin- the color guard since 2005. THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ning in January 1980. His wife and Moscow As a member of the community, Jared has FOUNDING OF THE MOSCOW HEL- Helsinki Group member, Dr. Elena Bonner, been active in 4–H, the North Kansas City SINKI GROUP joined him there in 1984 after having been High School Scholar Bowl Team, the Amer- convicted of ‘‘anti-Soviet agitation and propa- ican Heartland Theatre, and his church. Addi- HON. CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH ganda.’’ Founding member Anatoly Marchenko tionally, he has pursued many academic ac- OF NEW JERSEY died while on a hunger strike at Chistopol tivities outside of his regular schoolwork. He IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Prison in December 1986, has studied at Truman State University’s Jo- By the end of 1982, less than 7 years after seph Baldwin Academy for Eminent Young Wednesday, May 10, 2006 the group’s founding, it appeared that the KGB Scholars, studied hydrodynamics at a West- Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, 17 and the Soviet Government had triumphed minster College summer camp, and partici- years ago, my dear friend and colleague, Rep. over the small band of idealists who pressed pated in the Students in Academically Gifted FRANK WOLF, and I traveled to the Soviet their leaders to live up to the promises made Education program through the North Kansas Union, to visit the notorious Perm Labor Camp at Helsinki. With only three members at liberty City School District. No. 37, located in the shadows of the Ural and those under intense KGB pressure, the Jared has already enlisted into the United Mountains. There were three camps in the Moscow Helsinki Group was forced to sus- States Army Reserves as a Civil Affairs Spe- Perm labor camp complex that had been set pend its activities. By 1986, only one member cialist. Upon graduating from North Kansas up specifically in 1972 for political prisoners of the group, Naum Meiman, continued to City High School in May of 2006, Jared will and others whom Moscow considered ‘‘espe- meet with foreign visitors and Western cor- enter boot camp in June of 2006 and then cially dangerous.’’ Fortunately, by the time of respondents. Meiman’s wife, Irina, died of defer his active duty status until he completes VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:31 May 11, 2006 Jkt 049060 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 0626 Sfmt 9920 E:\CR\FM\A10MY8.028 E10MYPT1 jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REMARKS May 10, 2006 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E781 his college studies.
Recommended publications
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
  • Dissidents Versus Communists

    Dissidents Versus Communists

    DISSIDENTS VERSUS COMMUNISTS An Examination of the Soviet Dissidence Movement Matthew Williams Professor Transchel History 419 May 12, 2016 Williams 1 On February 25, 1956, Nikita Khrushchev gave a speech to the Twentieth Congress and to the Communist Party stating that Joseph Stalin was responsible for all of the empire’s then-current issues. He also gave insight into the criminal actions performed by the man during his lifetime. This speech was called the “Secret Speech” as it was not publicized at first, but once word got out about the true nature of Stalin, people began to doubt everything they knew to be true. Khrushchev decreased the censorship and restrictions on people and also freed millions of political prisoners from Gulags, beginning what would come to be referred to as the “thaw”. Many people had practically worshipped Stalin and knew him to represent the Communist party’s creed of infallibility. The tarnishing of his image led many people to seriously doubt the capabilities of the party.1 As truths came out and people began to discuss issues, there was increasing dissatisfaction with the Communist Party and a community of dissenters was born. This community of dissenters would ultimately keep the fight for freedom going long after the end of the thaw era, until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. This paper will examine the dissent movement, from its roots in the end of the Stalin era to the collapse in 1991; it will address how the dissent movement came into being, and how it evolved as new challenges were presented to it.
  • Russia 2012-2013: Attack on Freedom / 3 Introduction

    Russia 2012-2013: Attack on Freedom / 3 Introduction

    RUSSIA 2012-2013 : Attack on Freedom Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, February 2014 / N°625a Cover photo: Demonstration in front of the State Duma (Russian Parliament) in Moscow on 18 July 2013, after the conviction of Alexei Navalny. © AFP PHOTO / Ivan Novikov 2 / Titre du rapport – FIDH Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 1. Authoritarian Methods to Suppress Rights and Freedoms -------------------------------- 6 2. Repressive Laws ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.1. Restrictions on Freedom
  • The Moscow Helsinki Group the Seed from Which the Helsinki Movement Grew

    The Moscow Helsinki Group the Seed from Which the Helsinki Movement Grew

    Helsinki Committees The 1975 Helsinki Final Act recognized respect for human rights and funda- mental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief as one of the ten basic principles guiding relations between participat- ing States. It affirmed “the right of the individual to know and act upon his rights and duties in this field.” The Helsinki Final Act, or the Helsinki Accords, as the agreement was often called, was published in full by the main newspapers of the 35 participating States, informing the people of what their leaders had signed up to. Public acceptance of human rights and fundamental freedoms inspired the estab- lishment of Helsinki Committees in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, which were soon supported by similar groups in North America and Western Europe. It was dangerous at the time to report on violations of the Helsinki Final Act. In spite of the danger, their reports were tabled at the CSCE Follow- up meetings in the 1970s and 1980s and brought changes to people’s lives. Violations of human rights continue across the OSCE region. The work of the Helsinki Committees and related groups is as relevant today as it was 35 years ago. The Moscow Helsinki Group The seed from which the Helsinki movement grew by Ludmilla Alexeeva public group to monitor compliance with the Hel- observe the Helsinki Accords in full measure, including sinki Accords in the USSR, the Moscow Helsinki the humanitarian articles. Violation of these agreements A Group (MHG), was established in Moscow on 12 May could have led to the collapse of the Helsinki Accords, 1976 on the basis of the third “basket” of the Helsinki something the Soviet leadership could not accept.
  • Statement on Moscow Helsinki Group's 30 Anniversary

    Statement on Moscow Helsinki Group's 30 Anniversary

    PC.DEL/459/06 19 May 2006 ENGLISH only United States Mission to the OSCE Statement on Moscow Helsinki Group’s 30th Anniversary As delivered by Political Counselor Bruce Connuck to the Permanent Council, Vienna May 18, 2006 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Last week marked the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Moscow Helsinki Group. The United States applauds the Group's three decades of contributions to the worldwide movement for human rights. Established on May 12th, 1976 by a small circle of steadfast human rights activists, the Moscow Helsinki Group sought to promote the Soviet Union's implementation of the 1974 Helsinki accord -- an agreement linking security among states to respect for human rights within states. At a press conference held in Nobel Laureate Andrei Sakharov's apartment announcing the Group's formation, the Group's leader, physicist Yuri Orlov, asked those present to join him in the traditional toast of Soviet dissidents: "To the success of our hopeless cause!" Thanks in great measure to the courage, perseverance and sacrifice of the Moscow Helsinki Group members -- and the work of the NGOs that they inspired in the Soviet Union and Eastern and central Europe -- the Helsinki process has not just borne witness to historic changes once thought to be hopeless causes; it has helped to bring those changes about. We recognize the pioneering contributions the Group has made and the importance of NGOs to the development of civil society in supporting OSCE commitments. Mr. Chairman, even today, citizens of some OSCE participating States face harassment or arrest for meeting quietly in private homes and apartments.
  • From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution

    From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution

    Peter Slezkine From Helsinki to Human Rights Watch: How an American Cold War Monitoring Group Became an International Human Rights Institution On September 7, 2010, George Soros gave Human Rights Watch (HRW) a $100 million grant, the largest in its history. ‘‘I’m afraid the United States has lost the moral high ground under the Bush administration, but the principles that Human Rights Watch promotes have not lost their universal applicability,’’ he said. ‘‘So to be more effective, I think the organization has to be seen as more international, less an American organization.’’1 Today, it is taken for granted that HRW’s scope should be international and its principles universally applicable. It seems self-evident that an organization called Human Rights Watch should strive to monitor abuses wherever they occur and to enforce universal standards on a global scale. It is also understood that to be most effective (and least vulnerable to criticism), HRW should appear to reflect the univer- sality of its principles. In its ideal form, it would operate outside the world of particular allegiances, origins, and ideologies; at the very least, it would embody a global cross-section of particular concerns. Of course, such perfect impartiality and universal representativeness must always remain elusive. A headquarters in New York and a significant percentage of American donors and staff risk tying HRW’s moral standing to that of the U.S. government, as Soros pointed out. And the opening of each new office, the issuing of each new report, and the acceptance of each new donation may be construed as examples of particular biases that would undermine HRW’s declared universalism.
  • The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    GUERRILLA TACTICS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: THE PARADIGM OF SCIENTISTS FOR SAKHAROV, ORLOV AND SHARANSKY (SOS) (Invited speech on the occasion of the Sakharov Prize Award at the 2010 “April” meeting of the American Physical Society) February 15, 2010 Morris (Moishe ) Pripstein Physics Division, National Science Foundation I would like to thank the American Physical Society for honoring me as a co-recipient of the Sakharov Prize along with such illustrious human-rights activists as my colleagues Joe Birman and Herman Winick. I would also like to thank my wife, Flo, for her major contributions to the activities described below which led to this award and to our children, David, Jeremy and Laura, for their unstinting support throughout that hectic period. In addition, I want to express my deep appreciation to Elena Bonner for her very generous comments presented earlier in this session by her daughter, Tatiana Yankelevich, and to Tatiana and her brother Alexey Semyonov and his wife, Liza, for joining us in this occasion. This award is especially meaningful to me as it pays homage to the great scientist and human- rights champion Andrei Sakharov, a role model to many of us, and because of the outstanding previous awardees, Yuri Orlov and Xu Liangying. While many scientists have valiantly engaged in the struggle for human rights, it is this group, along with Natan Sharansky, Elena Bonner, Fang Li Zhi and the long list of other dissident and refusenik scientists who put their own lives at risk on behalf of human rights, who are the heroes of the movement and a special inspiration to the rest of us.
  • The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    AO-A093 577 DEPARTM4ENT OF STATE WASHINGTON DC OFFICE OF EXTERNAL--ETC F/S 5/14 POLITICAL RIGHTS BY--ETCfUI 17A-A 1- 7 THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND IUNCLASSIFIED FAR-3013 NL UflMENEMffllf INSTITUTE ON SOC& T LAW V VALERY CHALIDZE N JHE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION. Chief Consultant- Leon Lipson Consultants: Alexander Volpin I Konstantin Simis co George Ginsburgs Translation of the basic text: George Ginsburgs Collection of examples: Ludmilla Alexeyeva Pavel Litvinov This paper is written to order of the U.S. State Department I 'Lij New York, 1980 I 6'v Was p si fr~D epar~ter! of S~ i DIMUU'RIBTI NST ENT A f4rnea nerem ccu: nc, be .!-erpre!,-j 3z rev ,nt~ Approved for pu-Uc relea ;.;CY :" > "er e <- 9, i,•"-" THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Article 1. The Right of Self-Determination 9 Article 2. The Duty of States Party to the Covenant to 25 Respect and Ensure Human Rights Article 3. The Right of Men and Women to Equal Enjoyment 39 of all Civil and Political Rights Set Forth in the Covenant Article 4. The Right of States Party to the Present 41 Covenant to Take Measures Derogating from their obligations under the Present Covenant Article 5. Protection from Curtailment of any of the Rights 43 and Freedoms Recognized in the Present Covenant Article 6. Protection of the Right to Life 44 Article 7.
  • The Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics

    The Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : The Helsinki Watch Committees i n the Soviet Republics : Implica - tions for Soviet Nationalit y Policy AUTHOR : Yaroslav Bilinsky T8nu Parmin g CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Yaroslav Bilinsk y COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . Yaroslav Bilinsky (University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA ) Tönu Parmin g (University of Maryland, College Park, ND 20742, USA ) HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR SOVIETY NATIONALITY POLICY * Paper presented at Second World Congres s on Soviet and East European Studies , Garmisch-Partenkirchen, German Federal Republic , September 30 - October 4, 198 0 *This paper is based on the authors' longer study, The Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics : Implications for the Sovie t Nationality Question, which was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East Europea n Research, under Council Contract Number 621-9 . Travel to Garmisch- Partenkirchen has been--in Bilinsky's case—made possible by grant s from the American Council of Learned Societies and the University o f Delaware . The authors would like to thank their benefactors an d explicitly stress that the authors alone are responsible for th e contents of this paper . 2 Unexpectedly, within two years of the signing by the Sovie t Union, the United States, Canada, and thirty-two European states , of the long and solemn Final Act of the Conference on Security an d Cooperation in Europe in Helsinki, August l, 1975, there sprang u p as many as five groups of Soviet dissenters claiming that th e Helsinki Final Act justified their existence and activity .
  • Extensions of Remarks

    Extensions of Remarks

    12658 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS May 17, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS CHIPOLA JUNIOR COLLEGE 4-E Albert Folds, medical director at Sun­ Perhaps the centerpiece of the pro­ CONFERENCE AT MARIANNA, land Training Center; gram was the student science fair, FLA., TREMENDOUS Bill Holmberg, U.S. Energy Depart­ which drew 156 entries from our great ment; Mrs. Merle Houston, public af­ State. Particular credit is due Paul fairs for Chipola; Norwood Jackson, Coley, Dr. Sims, and Paul Huang for HON. DON FUQUA manager of the Jackson County making this such a tremendous suc­ OF FLORIDA Chamber of Commerce; David Nichol­ cess. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES son, instructor at Chipola; Scott Crossfield, one of the world's Tuesday, May 17, 1983 Dr. Dale O'Daniel, dean of business greatest test pilots and aeronautical at Chipola; Mike Peacock, Florida engineers, who now serves on our com­ •Mr. FUQUA. Mr. Speaker, If ever public utilities; Pete Pylant, Com­ mittee staff, went down as a special this Nation comes to grips with the in­ merce Department of the State of guest to talk to young people and creasing problems we face in providing Florida, Tallahassee; judge the exhibits. energy for future generations, it will Dr. Joyner Sims, dean of students at The West Florida Electric Coopera­ be because the American people are Chipola; Ken Stoutamire, director of tive provided a fried chicken dinner convinced that it is a real and serious vocational training at Sunland; Tom for over 1,100 young people who at­ problem. I am convinced that realiza­ Thayer, Governor's Energy Office, tion will only come about because of tended the science fair.
  • US Cuts Back on Official Exchanges with USSR Soviet Union Responds

    US Cuts Back on Official Exchanges with USSR Soviet Union Responds

    Nature Vol. 283 7 February 1980 513 Andrei Sakharov even if limiting activities in these channels, what such discussions should aim. US cuts back on was supported by Academy President Dr Dr Paul J Flory, for example, Emeritus Philip Handler, who will be leading the US Professor of Chemistry at Stanford official exchanges delegation to the scientific forum in University and a member of the US Hamburg later this month to discuss the delegation, suggested that the scientific with USSR progress of the Helsinki accords of 1975. community should "reshape its criteria for THE US scientific community has been But he emphasised the Academy's position participation" and lay down a set of almost unanimous in condemning recent that the main responsibility lay on the minimum conditions for future inter­ moves by the government of the USSR, in shoulders of individual scientists. national collaboration. the occupation of Afghanistan and the Uncertainty over how tough the These might include the condition that internal exile of physicist Andrei administration should be is reflected in the "negotiations should be in the hands of Sakharov. debate over what type of strategy the US scientists, not governments", and that But while many support the legitimacy delegation should pursue at the Hamburg participants be selected "without regard of individual protest, there remains science forum. for their political conformity, race or uncertainty over how far official reaction Few currently support a complete ethnic background''. should undermine the network of bilateral boycott of the meeting. And there seems Others have suggested more modest exchange agreements which have, in recent general agreement that human righs con­ goals.
  • Human Rights in the Cold

    Human Rights in the Cold

    17 HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE COLD WAR Sarah B. Snyder Scholars interested in human rights during the Cold War are increasingly producing innovative new work on the issue.1 Unfortunately, human rights has not yet warranted serious, sustained consideration by those writing survey accounts of the Cold War. For example, John Lewis Gaddis’ The Cold War mentions human rights in connection with only four subjects: the Jackson-Vanik Amendment, Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy, the United Nations, and the Helsinki Final Act.2 Yet, human rights mattered to international relations at far more points in the Cold War. We can think of the Cold War as bookended by two major human rights developments – agreement to the 1948 United Nations (UN) Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the influence of human rights and human rights advocacy on the end of the Cold War. In between, attention to human rights abuses internationally was inconsistent and often overshadowed by the perceived stakes of the Cold War in political, military, ideological, and economic terms. Existing scholarship on human rights in the Cold War has repeatedly pointed to two human rights “booms” – one in the late 1940s and one in the 1970s.3 This chapter, however, will argue that the pattern was more undulating and that moments might be a more useful framework for understanding when human rights emerged as a priority in international relations.4 Human Rights during the Early Cold War Building upon the UN Charter’s affirmation of respect for human rights, the UN Human Rights Commission began drafting a document that outlined international human rights norms and protected individual freedoms in 1947.5 Members of the Human Rights Commission considered the devastation of World War Two and former United States President Franklin D.