ELIZABETH TOWNSEND GARD Tulane

Annotated Curriculum Vitae (updated as of February 2019)

ELIZABETH TOWNSEND GARD

Tulane University Law School Office 355B Weinmann Hall (504) 862 8822 (office) 6329 Freret Street (504) 339 3857 (cell) New Orleans, LA 70118 skype: elizabethtownsendgard [email protected]

CURRENTLY

(Now) Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School, 2007- Founder and Co-Director, Tulane Law Center for IP, Media and Culture, 2009- Director and Host Just Wanna Quilt Research Podcast, www.justwannaquilt.com Director and Co-Inventor, Durationator® Experiment, 2007- Director, Copyright Research Lab, 2007- Non-Resident Fellow, Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School, 2004- Newcomb Fellow, Tulane University, 2012-

EDUCATION

LL.M. University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, May 2005 Trade Law, NAFTA, Copyright and International Intellectual Property; Chair: David Gantz, with Graeme Austin

J.D. University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, May 2002 International and Comparative Journal of Law, University of Arizona Clerking NAFTA Dispute Panels (Chapter 20 and Chapter 11 cases)

Ph.D. Modern European History, University of California, Los Angeles, June 1998 Dissertation: "Reconstructing Vera Brittain's War Generation: A Comparative Biography" Committee: Robert Wohl (chair), Joyce Appleby, Anne Mellor (English), and Orals Committee included Robert Dallek and Albion Urdank.

M.A. Modern European History University of California, Los Angeles, June 1994

B.A. History (Honors Thesis) University of California, Los Angeles, 1991

TEACHING POSITIONS

Professor, Tulane University Law School, 2007- Property, IP, Copyright, International IP, Trademarks, Art Law Third Year Review completed, Spring 2010 Faculty Tenure Vote, February 18, 2013 Faculty Promotion to Full Professor: July 1, 2017

Visiting Assistant Professor, Seattle University School of Law, 2006-07 Property, Copyright, IP Survey

Lecturer, London School of Economics, University of London, 2005-06 International Copyright, IP Survey (British)

Lecturer, History Department, UCLA, 1996-1998

Teaching Assistant, History Department, UCLA, 1994-1995

TEACHING AREAS Courses Taught Property IP Survey International Intellectual Property Copyright (U.S., British) Art and Culture Law Trademarks Copyright and Orphan Works Mini-Course (co-taught with Glynn Lunney) Advertising law Social Media Law IP in the Employment Context Quilting and Copyright (Advanced Copyright) Video Games and the Law IP in the Employment Context

Additional Teaching Areas Legal History Trade Law Social Entrepreneurship and the Law Catastrophes and War (History, Culture, Law) European and American History Gender and Women’s History

FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS

Paul Verkuil Faculty Research Fund, Tulane Law School, Fall 2018 Funds to support research on the quilting industry.

Provost Research Funds, 2 years @ $5000 a year, 2018-2020 Funds to support research on the quilting industry and Durationator project.

Jill H. and Avram A. Glazer Professorship in Social Entrepreneurship, Tulane University, 2012- 2018 Three academic years, renewable. Included as part of the award is helping develop the SE Minor at Tulane University, and recognition of my social entreprenuer research and agenda. The minor is housed in the School of Architecture, and the appointment was approved by the Provost in December 2012.

Newcomb Fellow, Tulane University, Spring 2012- My doctoral work focused on gender and war, and in anticipation of returning to this work soon, I applied and was awarded a Newcomb Fellow position.

IVEC Entrepreneur, The Idea Village Entrepreneur Challenge 2011 (for Durationator® Experiment), Intensive Assistance, November 1, 2010-April 2011. This award included a six-month intensive coaching with resources available for the development of a business model for the Durationator® Copyright Experiment.

IDEA Corp, Durationator®, (paired with University of California Business school students for IDEA Corp business plan competition), Feb-April 2011. The Durationator® was paired with a dozen U.S. Berkeley students, who worked on part of our business plan for three months. I went to visit them in California, and then they came for a weeklong intensive session.

Faculty Award, Participation in U.S. Holocaust Museum, Curt C. and Else Silberman Seminar for Faculty, “Jewish Responses to the Holocaust: Teaching the Victims’ Perspective”, June 2-15, 2010. This two-week, eight-hours a day sessions focused on how victims are depicted in the Holocaust. We had a long required reading list and film list. We also got explosure and use of the archival materials. The award included travel and lodging at the St. Gregory Hotel for the duration of the seminar. I also began research into how copyright was operating within the U.S. Holocaust museum on many levels—materials they were obtaining from other archives, materials they were creating, and materials that they were cataloging. An early version of this paper was presented at a Faculty Brown Bag in the Summer 2010. I hope to have a final version of the paper in Winter 2014.

Tulane University Technology Transfer IDEA Grant ($25,000, Spring 2010) The Technology Transfer office gave me an award to allow two graduating students to stay on our project for another six months. We were able to create a video, business plan, and continue to work on the core research of the project.

Tulane University Research Enhancement Grant—Phase IIB - ($60,000, 2008-2010) Recovering Our Usable Past - The Status of Copyright Duration in the U.S. and Abroad This major grant gave me the resources to build the Durationator® Copyright Experiment, and also funded the “Future of Copyright ” Speaker series. The first speaker series included Diane Zimmerman (NYU), James Boyle (Duke), Graeme Dinwoodie (Oxford), Pam Samuelson (U.C. Berkeley), Mark Rose (U.C. Santa Barbara), and Peter Jaszi (American). Justice Faculty Fellow, Center for the Study of Justice in Society, Seattle University, 2006-07 I was part of an interdisciplinary group from across Seattle University campus that was looking at the Doha Amendment and access to medicine. This was a profound experience—to understand the issue from perspectives of nurses, anthropologists, African Studies, etc. Margaret Chon, faculty at the law school, chaired the program.

Leverhulme Trust Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, London, UK, 2005-06 This was a highly competitive research fellowship that gave me funding for the academic year to live and work in London. My topic was unpublished works in duration, comparing U.S. and U.K. systems. This was the beginning of what would become my job talk for Tulane, and also the serious works that began the Durationator® Copyright Experiment. I also taught at LSE during the year, U.K. copyright and International/Comparative Copyright (year long LL.M. course). Non-resident Fellow, Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School, 2004- This was my first major affiliation within the legal academy after law school, and my first professional presentation (in front of Larry Lessig). The topic was unpublished works in the form of Section 303(a) of the 1976 Copyright Act. This affiliation has continued to play an important role in my development—colleagues, work on the Golan case, and being part of a larger community.

James E. Rogers LL.M. Graduate Fellowship, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, 2002-03. The graduate fellowship allowed me to pursue the LL.M. tuition free, and to pursue my interest in the connection between intellectual property law and international trade. At the time, I was also working as an assistant for David Gantz, who served as an arbitrator for NAFTA disputes. I continued this work during the LL.M. program.

Graduate and Professional Travel Grant, University of Arizona, 2001 The travel grant provided me funds for a conference regarding culture and copyright while a law student. First Year Moot Court Award, University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, 1999. Snell and Wilmer Tuition Scholarship University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law.

Friends of History Dissertation Fellowship, University of California, Los Angeles, 1996-97 This award funded my doctoral writing period, and allowed me to complete my dissertation very quickly. (I was the first of 21 students in my class to finish, completing my M.A. and Ph.D. within a total of six years). The award came with an obligation to present the work to the Friends of History as well.

Schlesinger Library Dissertation Grant, Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America, Radcliffe College, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Summer 1996 I worked in the archives in Cambridge, looking in particular at the Papers of Mary Lee, an author of an important WWI book, which I used in my dissertation. I was thrilled to get this very competitive and prestigious award.

Harry S. Truman Library and Museum Research Grant, Harry S. Truman Presidential Library, Independence, Missouri, Summer 1996 This was a month-long grant that allowed me to work in Harry Truman library. In particular, I was looking at both his experiences during WWI, as well as the legacy of that experience in his letters and papers. The work was part of my doctoral research.

Collegium of University Teaching Fellowship, University of California, Los Angeles, 1995-96 This competitive year-long award recognized excellence in teaching at the graduate student level. The award included sessions with other graduate students across campus to discuss teaching and the funding/teaching of a seminar of one’s own design. I focused my seminar on the Culture of War. Because of the success of the seminar, I was given two additional seminars to teach in my own department, on Generations in History, and the other, again on War.

Center for the Study of Women Travel Grants, University of California, Los Angeles, 1992, 1996. This grant afforded me the opportunity to travel to Canada and to London to look at the necessary archival materials for my dissertation. My doctoral work focused on British experiences in the Great War. Some of the materials were housed at McMaster University in Canada, and I also made trips to the archives in England, including Harrods Department Store, the papers of R.C. Sherriff, and the Imperial War Museum.

IN PROGRESS PAPERS/PROJECTS

Durationator (see below) 10-year long project focused on copyright term around the world.

Just Wanna Quilt: A Research Podcast Beginning in 2017, a five-year project focused on understanding the quilting industry through interviews that will be broadcast as podcasts. The project will also include law review articles (originality of polka dots, patentability of rules, etc.), and writings for quilters on copyright and being a quilt enterpreneur. The project includes nightly (yes) quilting, blogging, and engaging in social media. See the website: www.justwannaquilt.com. As of Feb 2019, I have interviewed over 300 interviews, 200 of which have aired so far. The podcast went live on Feb 6, 2018 and is available at iTunes. Two books are in progress as well, and one law review article focused on copyright. We have around 4500 people listening per day, and we post 3-4 episodes a week.

Quilting and IP: It's Not What You Think Patents, Trademarks, and Copyright – and a $5 billion quilting industry. How does it all work? (in progress, expected completion August 2018).

This paper has had a lot of press, including Slate, EduSurge, BoingBoing, and Arts Technica. Based on work conducted at the Internet Archive, New York Public Library, and the Frick Collection. Works in the last twenty years of their copyright, under certain circumstances may be reproduced and distributed by libraries. This explains how. See Slate story at http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2017/11/the_sonny_bono_memori al_collection_fights_copyright_creep.html

(Il)legal Art: Role of Law in Creativity Book project with law students. Forty-three chapters including street art, tattoo art, Etsy, museums, and other topics. Expected completion 2019.

Just Wanna Quilt: A Copyright Study and Workbook This looks at the quilting industry and asks how copyright plays into this. This is both a study and a workbook. This is the culmination of the immersive work of the project and podcast. Expected completion 2019.

PUBLICATIONS

Intellectual Property and Art, Handbook on Intellectual Property Research, ed. Irene Calboli and Maria Montagnani, eds., Oxford University Press (forthcoming) (invited)

Creating a Last Twenty (L20) Collection: Implementing Section 108(h) in Libraries, Archives and Museums (UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, forthcoming)

Video Games and the Law, co-written with Ron Gard (Routledge, 2017)

J.D. Salinger and Rule of the Shorter Term, 19 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. 777 (2017)

This paper focuses on the question of when does a work expire around the world, and the doctrine "Rule of the Shorter Term."

Mitigating Term: A Proposal, Journal of Copyright Society of the USA, Copyright Soc'y 63, 1- 53 (2016)

This paper looks at the recent questions of whether copyright should be altered, and what role copyright term might play.

Kamil: the Artist and Copyright Observed, Elizabeth Townsend Gard and Yvette Joy Liebesman, 5 IP Theory 94 (2015)

This paper looks at the life of an artist and asks what the copyright term is on the body of works.

Comment, Technological Upgrades to Registration and Recordation Functions, U.S. Copyright Office (in progress)

I will write (along with my students) a Comment on our experiences with the CCE records and records at the Copyright Office in the course of our Durationator® Copyright Experiment project.

Reply Comment, Orphan Works, U.S. Copyright Office

Lead Faculty Writer, in collaboration with the 2013 Advanced Copyright and Orphan Works Mini-Course. We focused on 1) examining the Comments; and 2) looking at what elements of the Copyright Act would assist in solving some of the orphan work problems. We also did a comparison of the 2005 Comments with the 2013 Comments. Reply Comment available at http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/noi_11302012/Tulane-University-Law- School.pdf

A Tale of Two Ginsburgs: Eldred v. Ashcroft and Golan v. Holder (Depaul L.R. 2014)

This piece will be published by DePaul Law Review as their 100th journal piece. The paper was ambitious. At first (when it was accepted) it compared copyright and patent law within the context of the phrase “traditional contours,” as the Golan decision had just come down and a patent case with secondary arguments that incorporated the First Amendment, Mayo v. Prometheus, was also being decided at the U.S. Supreme Court. The argument was that traditional contours of copyright (seen in Eldred and Golan) could also be applied within the patent context to bring clarity. As I was working on the piece, after it was accepted, however, I came to the realization that there were two pieces here, and this piece then focused on the dramatic shift that had occurred in Ginsburg’s thinking in Eldred (2003) and Golan (2012). The piece focuses on how “traditional contours of copyright protection” has been used, by Ginsburg, in other courts, and by scholars, and then suggests where we might go after Ginsburg’s narrowing of the phrase in Golan. The piece was originally to be published in fall 2012, but the EIC asked if we could move it to the spring to be highlighted as their 100th journal article.

“The Durationator® Copyright Experiment: An Global Introduction,” UNESCO “Memory of the World” Conference Proceedings, September 2012. (forthcoming)

This paper discusses our current strategic research partners, along with our Copyright Advisory Board, and discusses why the Durationator® is important to scholars, students, digitizers, content owners, artists, filmmakers, musicians, hobbyists, and anyone else either using or creating cultural works in the 21st century.

Copyright and Social Media: A Preliminary Case Study of Pinterest, co-authored with Bri Whetstone, 31 Mississippi College Law Review (Social Media Symposium), 2012. (invited)

This is the first paper published related to my new research project, Copyright and Social Media: an Investigation (see Five-Year Plan), that will focus on the way copyright works within social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, Get Glue, Instagram, Wikipedia, The Johnny Cash Project, Doodle.ly, Flickr, and Deviant Art. This Pinterest research explored the possibility of a larger study. Pinterest is the latest rising social media platform, which operates as a virtual pinboard to post photos in a kind of window-shopping, dreaming- of-redoing-one’s-kitchen kind of way—meaning posting pictures that are not one’s own. Pinterest gained attention for potential copyright infringement in Winter 2012, and this paper explores the platform as a case study, the first of a dozen for the larger study (presented at an invited paper for the IP Section at the AALS in January 2013). Bri Whetstone, currently a 3L at Tulane Law School wrote the “terms of service” section, and is working on a spin-off paper specifically on the topic of “terms of service” in social media platforms.

“Golan and Prometheus as Misfit First Amendment Cases,” Cato Supreme Court Review (2012)

I was invited by the Cato Institute to write a comparative piece on Golan and Prometheus, two IP cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011 and decided in 2012. Both contained a First Amendment argument, and in both instances the Court ignored the First Amendment issues entirely. The piece notes that the Cato Institute, which filed briefs on both cases, was the only one to connect the idea that if Mayo was claiming a First Amendment argument in patent law, surely this called into play the “traditional contours” language from copyright law, as discussed in Eldred and Golan. The Cato Supreme Court Review is ranked #4 in the category of constitutional law reviews. Other authors of this issue include Jonathan Adler, James F. Blumstein, Richard W. Garnett, Roderick M. Hills Jr., James Huffman, and Alex Kozinski.

Federalizing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings: Two Proposals, co-authored with Erin Anapol, 15 Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Fall 2012. The article also evaluates the U.S. Copyright Office’s proposal, as compared to ours, which we presented in our Reply Comment to the Copyright Office. (See Reply Comment below)

“The Making of the Durationator®: An Unexpected Journey into Entrepreneurship,” book chapter in Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Evolving Economies: the Role of Law, Megan Carpenter, ed., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.

This piece the Section 104A/Golan work in the context of my larger research project: the Durationator® Copyright Experiment. In short, the Durationator® takes complex legal research related to copyright and codes it into a usable software program for lawyers and non-lawyers alike. This paper discusses the journey so far and how my legal research became a patent pending invention. For tenure purposes, it is important to understand that the Durationator® has required extensive research in many areas, and that this paper is an overview of the project itself (as of the time of printing in 2012).

In the Trenches with Section 104A:An Evaluation of the Parties’ Arguments in Golan v. Holder as It Heads to the U.S. Supreme Court, Vanderbilt Law Review (invited, 64 Vand L. Rev. En Banc 199 (2011)) (*cited twice by the Breyer dissent in Golan v. Holder, January 18, 2012.) (tenure review publication)

Shortly after the publication of the Columbia Law and the Arts piece, the Vanderbilt EIC invited me to participate in their en banc review of the Golan case, which was then headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The five pieces would be published just before oral arguments, and the hope was that they would influence the Justices’ decision. Two of the five pieces were cited by the Supreme Court, both in Breyer’s dissent: my piece and a piece by Daniel Gervais, a prominent law professor at Vanderbilt Law School. My piece looked at the parties’ and amici briefs, and evaluated the arguments being made. What was most surprising was that the Government’s argument remained fairly weak and unsupported by evidence, and that the amici in support of the Government had put little effort into their briefs in terms of supporting materials. The discussion remained the same battle as in the two Tenth Circuit, and remanded district court, decisions. I argued that even if the Government’s argument was accurate (which it was not), Section 104A did not fulfill the requirements of the Berne Convention and therefore the US was still not compliant with our treaty obligations. The piece discussed the coding work we have been doing at Tulane Law School, particularly the difficulties we encountered with Section 104A, which has taken hundreds of hours to research and code because of the way the amendment was structured. Justice Breyer cited my work at Tulane as an example of how complex Section 104A and the Berne Convention are This was a particularly profound moment, as it seemed to legitimize all of the work we have been doing on coding copyright duration around the world in our Durationator® Copyright Experiment.

Reply Comment, Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, U.S. Copyright Office (created collaboratively with the 2011 Copyright Class), April 13, 2011, available at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/sound/comments/reply/041311elizabeth-townsend- gard.pdf (*cited and proposal partially adopted by Copyright Office report) As part of our course, we researched and composed a reply comment to the U.S. Copyright Office’s call for comments regarding whether to federalize pre-1972 sound recordings. The exercise was the perfect fit, and we were able to present the class’s work to the General Counsel of the Copyright Office, who came to our “Future of Copyright” speaker series. The class looked at each issue involved as we learned the basics of copyright (ownership issues, for example) and then we came up with proposals for federalization, debated, and voted. The final document was a reflection of our work. I then represented the class at the Roundtable Discussion in D.C., in June. The U.S. Copyright Office report included and built upon our suggestions.

Copyright Law v. Trade Policy: Understanding the Golan Battle within the Tenth Circuit, 34 Columbia Journal for Law and the Arts 2 (Winter 2011), 131-199. (Tenure review publication)

This first piece on Section 104A began in much the same way as my work on unpublished works: I wanted to understand how a major change in the law operated in terms of its history, through both unpacking its requirements and looking at examples of its application. The amendment at the time was over a decade old, and so I had no inkling that any instability or questions as to its constitutionality would be at issue. I wanted to know how Section 104A, which removed foreign works from the public domain, compared to Section 303(a), which brought new works into the public domain. I began drafting the piece in 2007, just after the Tenth Circuit decision, and would undergo major revisions with the district court remand in 2009 and the second Tenth Circuit decision in 2010. The paper was accepted for publication in the spring of 2010 and published in winter 2011 by Columbia Journal for Law and the Arts, a top five IP journal.

With W. Ron Gard, “Marked by Modernism: Reconfiguring the “Traditional Contours of Copyright Law” for the Twenty-First Century” Modernism and Copyright, edited by Paul Saint-Amour, Oxford University Press,155-172 (invited piece and published)

With W. Ron Gard, The Present (User-Generated Crisis) is the Past (1909 Copyright Act): An Essay Theorizing the “Traditional Contours of Copyright” Language, 28 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 455, (455-499) (2011)

These two pieces explore the theoretical underpinning of why copyright law operates the way it does, with particular attention paid to the physics of the phrase “traditional contours of copyright protection.” This early work dramatically altered how we approached the problems we were encountering in the Durationator® Copyright Experiment. We had always thought of the system as how people came into the system—how they had gotten protection. But we had to rethink this, and it was this piece that made us realize why the system was designed the way it was and how we had to approach our problems more as archeologists and not merely as rational analysts. The first piece, an invited chapter in an Oxford U.P., began our preliminary work and we expanded it for a legal audience in the second piece for Cardozo.

Introduction to Shirley Millard’s I Saw Them Die (1936, reprinted Quid Pro Books, 2011)

Alan Childress invited me to write an introduction for this WWI diary that had fallen into the public domain and was little remembered. I was delighted to contribute. The introduction was based on the introduction in my dissertation work.

“The Fizzy Experiment: Second Life, Virtual Property and a 1L Property Course,” 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech L.J. 915 (2008) (invited) (co-authored with Rachel Goda)

While a VAP at Seattle University School of Law, I taught a year-long property class. During the second semester I dared to take all one hundred students into Second Life to explore whether elements of property that we were studying in our 1L class were evident in this social media platform. A 3L student, Rachel Goda, who had extensive gaming experience, worked with me to design an experiment that would be easy for students with little to no experience would be able to master. We had one avatar. Fizzy was her name. Each week a different set of students would research a particular topic – easements, finders, marriage, etc. The students created short videos, which were posted (and are still available) at Blip.tv. Rachael and I were asked to present our work at Santa Clara University Law School, and the paper describes the experiment and its outcomes. Because of the paper and experiment, Rachael was able to go on and work at Second Life once she graduated. The paper was completed and published a year after I arrived at Tulane Law School.

"Unpublished Work and the Public Domain: The Opening of a New Frontier, "54 J. Copyright Society of the U.S.A. (Winter 2007)

This piece explored the changes in the copyright system brought about by Section 303(a), which, enacted as part of the 1976 Copyright Act, brought unpublished works (diaries, some films, almost all broadcasts including radio shows, manuscripts, and letters) under federal law for the first time. Section 303(a) provided a grace period of twenty-five years before any unpublished works (from the beginning of time) came into the public domain, and an incentive period in which copyright holders could publish these pre-1978 works for the first time. The incentive period expired on December 31, 2002. This piece I) provides an introduction to Section 303(a); II) contextualizes the legal changes that bring unpublished works under federal law, including their impact on foreign works and in the international arena; III) explains how one determines unpublished versus published status for purposes of Section 303(a); and, finally, IV) assesses the new frontier of unpublished public domain works, looking at examples in traditional publications, archives and archive finding aids, and microfilm, and discussing the difficulty of assessing copyright status in some cases due to a variety of circumstances. The piece ends with a discussion of where unpublished works fit within discourse on the public domain.

Podcasting for Corporations and Universities—Look Before You Leap (invited, co-authored with Colette Vogele), J. Internet Law (October 2006)

This piece explored the new (in 2006) phenomenon of podcasting, and whether the new technology was good for corporations and/or universities. Colette Vogele (now at Microsoft, but at the time we were both fellows at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society) focused on the corporate side, while I expanded my work on copyright in universities to look at the impact of podcasting on faculty, particularly regarding academic freedom, commercialization of faculty work, student privacy, and other issues that might arise with taping one’s classroom.

"The Birth of the Unpublished Public Domain and the International Implications," 24 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. (2006)

This piece that represents my preliminary thoughts on how to understand the revolution that was Section 303(a). It uses four examples: A.S. Byatt’s Possession: A Novel, Jane Austen’s early unpublished novel (recently posted online by the British Library), Marion Cummings unpublished diary (at the Newberry Library in Chicago), and Vera Brittain’s correspondence with her brother and fiancé during World War I. The focus of the piece, in many ways, was how we are to understand when a work is published for purposes of Section 303(a) and thus gains additional protection, particularly if it is posted on the Internet.

"NAFTA, Mexican Trucks and the Border: Making Sense of Years of International Arbitration, Domestic Debates, and the Supreme Court," 31 Transportation L.J. 131 (Spring-Summer 2004).

This was my LL.M. thesis. I had worked as an assistant on the Chapter 20 NAFTA panel on cross-border trucking. My LL.M. focused on International Trade, as I thought that was an important element in understanding intellectual property. The paper focuses on the regulation of Mexican trucks, and whether they could cross outside the commercial zone boarder areas, as part of the NAFTA requirements. The Mexican government filed for a NAFTA arbitration panel, when the U.S. did not meet their obligations to allow Mexican trucks into the U.S. by January 2000. The article looks at the basic issues involved in the NAFTA arbitration. The article then looks at the complex questions beyond the law, and the relationships and potential outcomes involved. This includes a history of trucking between the U.S. and Mexico, the U.S.’s response to the NAFTA panel decision in Mexico’s favor, and the environmental concerns raised. The piece ends with a discussion of potential future roadblocks to Mexican trucks crossing freely into the U.S.

"Legal and Policy Responses to the Disappearing 'Teacher Exception,’ or Copyright Ownership in the 21s Century University," 4 Minn. Intell. Prop. Rev. 209 (2003)

My first major law review article on copyright law, I take great pride in this article as an example of a piece that looked at doctrine, policy, and changing expectations. My podcasting piece with Colette Vogele took lessons from this piece and applied them within the context of podcasting in a university setting. This piece was recognized by William Patry (of Patry on Copyright) on his blog at the time. Who owns academic work? This article traces the changes taking place in education with the assumption that teachers owned their work product of the classroom. This was an early article on the subject, and since then, many teachers unions have bargained away this “right.” Part I of the article introduced the reader to the changing nature of the university as a commercialized environment, and why the interest in lectures, Power Points, and other forms of classroom materials were becoming more attractive and of interest to universities, as the shift in thinking changed with the rise of distance learning but also the significant rise of patents and trademarks as a focus within the university. Part II explains the basics of copyright and ownership to understand the nature of the question of who owns works created by teachers and professors for the classroom. Part III traces the debate over and changes with the 1976 Copyright Act, and in particular, gives an explanation for the noticeable omission of the “teacher exception” in the 1976 Copyright Act. Part IV reviews some of the responses in the form of university policies around the country. Part V ends with suggestions of ways in which students, scholars, teachers, and other academics might approach their intellectual property creations in this new environment.

Dissertation: “Reconstructing Vera Brittain's War Generation: A Comparative Biography,” UCLA (1998)

My dissertation focused on the war experiences of Vera Brittain, and then compared her experiences to men and women of her generation. Supervised by Robert Wohl, the dissertation asserted that the definition of “generation” should be expanded to include a wider group of men and women than have been traditional included. My work built upon the thinking of Fussell, Wohl, and Hynes.

"Generations and Generational Conflict," Encyclopedia of European Social History, (Charles Scribner's Sons), (invited, signed article).

This is an invited article that provides an overview of how the term “generation” has been used throughout history, and in particular explores generational theory.

"Common Ground of War: The Clinician and Cultural Historian in Symbiosis," National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Quarterly, Spring 1996. (invited)

This invited piece comes from my work and week-long experience of visiting the PTSD center in Palo Alto, where I found that what I was studying in my dissertation—cultural expression of catastrophic experiences—was being practiced as a therapeutic exercise. Paintings, autobiographical writing, quilting, and other experiences were all utilized to help war veterans heal.

"Postmodernism and Biography: A Dialogue," co-written with Elizabeth Covington, UCLA Historical Journal, 1995.

This essay looks at how postmodernism intersects with the writing of biography.

"This is the World I Create: Gender and Current First World War Scholarship," UCLA Historical Journal, 1994.

This review essay looks at how gender was represented in WWI scholarship. This article traced the development of the field of writing about the Great War, beginning in the 1970s, with the resurgence of interest in the culture of war in the face of Vietnam War.

SELECTED CONFERENCE PAPERS and ROUNDTABLE PARTICIPATION

Daily podcast, Just Wanna Quilt, with 300+ guests (including scholars), Feb 2018-present

“Key Element in Copyright,” Threads of Success, November 2019

“Patents for Crafters,” Threads of Success, November 2019

“IP Survey,” Threads of Success, November 2019

“How to Make a Copyright Map,” QuiltCon, Feb 2019

“Trademark: Mine, Yours,” QuiltCon, Feb 2019

“IP: It’s Not What you Think,” QuiltCon, Feb. 2019

(IL)Legal Art, AALS, New Orleans, January 2019 (invited)

“Copy Talk,” American Library Association, May 2017.

“Last Twenty,” University of Houston Law School, faculty and library staff, October 2017.

Durationator Summer Tour, 2017, vising San Francisco Chicago, New York, New Hampshire, Boston, and other places along the way.

“Copyright in the Universities,” The National Higher Educational General Conference, Las Vegas, March 23-24, 2016

Moderator, “A Lenz into the Future: The State of Takedowns for 2016), Copyright Society of the USA Mid-Winter Meeting (New Orleans) 2016 (invited)

Organizer, “Student and Practioner Viewpoints – a Dual Perspective,” Copyright Society of the USA Mid-Winter Meeting (New Orleans) 2016) (invited)

“Copyright Reform,” (invited Talk), Iowa City, October 2015

“Mapping Copyright” (invited), UCLA Entertainment Law Colloquium, 2015

“Rule of the Shorter Term and International Issues in Duration,” Copyright Duration (invited), Tulsa, 2015.

“IP in LA” Field Trip (organizer), 2015

“The Greatest/Hardest Copyright Exam in the World: A Roundtable of Impossible Questions:” Organizer and Host, Tulane University Law School, Feb 2015. Guests included reps from Warner Brothers, Microsoft, NYPL, Library of Congress, and universities including NYU, GW, Drake, and Tulane.

“Duration and the Durationator: A Proposal for Reform and Living,” Copyright Society of the USA Annual Meeting, Nashville, Feb 2015 (invited).

“Is Fair Use Code-able,” co-author with Geena Yu, WIPIP 2015, Washington DC.

“The Role of Copyright in Museum Strategy: Going Local,” NOMA, November 13, 2014 (invited)

“Copyright and Food,” From Farm to Table Conference, Southern Museum of Food and Beverage, November 7, 2014 (invited)

“Innovative Teaching Methods, IP Panel, AALS, January 2015 (invited)

Orphan Works Roundtable, US Copyright Office, March 2014

“Academic Lean Startup” (invited) Innovation Institute, Texas A&M School of Law, 2014

“Copyright Restoration and the Arts,” (invited) Conference on IP and Performing and Visual Arts, Maurer School of Law, May 16, 2014

“21st Century Copyrighting Kids,” (invited) Chicago IP Colloqium, April 2014

“Copyright and Artist’s Work: The Example of Kubil Kamil,” WIPIP 2014

“Durationator 2.0: A Discussion and Demonstration,” Columbia University, 2013.

“Intellectual Property Legislation and Litigation Update, Society of American Archivists, August 2013 (invited) This is a roundtable discussion on what elements of the law are currently impacting on libraries and archives.

Panel Participant, “WORKSHOP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Discussion Group: IP Law Reform—Same as Before, or a More Fundamental Transformation?” SEALS, Sunday, August 4 2013

Mentor, NEW SCHOLARS COLLOQUIA (Panel #3), Intellectual Property, SEALS Monday, August 4, 2013 (invited)

Presenter, WORKSHOP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Copyright Tomorrow, and Yesterday, SEALS, Tuesday, August 5 2013

Different Models for Revived Formalities Panel, Refrom(aliz)ing Copyright for the Internet Age, April 18-19, 2013, U.C. Berkeley (invited)

“Social Media and Copyright,” AALS IP and Social Media Panel, January 2013 (invited) The panel looks at Social Media in copyright (me), patents, and trademark. This is the only AALS panel on IP, and so was a great honor.

The Durationator® Copyright Experiment Explained, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University (Invited), December 2012. Ron Gard and I have been asked to give a presentation to the Berkman Center, who has potential interest in collaborating on the Durationator® Copyright Experiment.

“Testing the Durationator® Copyright Experiment: An Inside Look on Copyright Status” In Re Books, NYLS, October 2012 (invited) I was on the first panel of this insanely great conference, which featured key people from the book, academic and library industry. I presented our research results for University of Michigan, and was able to get more people interested in our project including the New York consortium of museums (that includes the Frick Collection, MOMA, the Met, among others), Copyright Clearance Center, and others from around the country.

“Post-Golan, IP and the Constitution,” Franklin Pierce Center for IP, University of New Hampshire Law School, September 2012 (invited) This paper explored the lessons we should take away from Golan, namely that the focus of our work should be on shaping and influencing at the treaty-making and legislative- drafting stage, because Golan teaches us that the U.S. Supreme Court is not willing to take a serious look at the flaws of the implementing legislation, even when the legislation does not fulfill the treaty requirements.

“Access and Transparency of Copyright Law Through Code: An Introduction to the Durationator®, UNESCO, The Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation,” 26 to 28 September 2012, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. This was an introduction to the Durationator® for a global, digital library audience.

“Traditional Contours after Golan, Prometheus, and Viacom,” 5th Annual Junior Scholars IP Workshop (JSIP) at Michigan State University College of Law, May 2012. I presented the DePaul piece at this conference.

“User-Generated Generation: Social Media and Copyright Law,” Mississippi College of Law (invited talk) February 2012 I was invited to give a talk about Social Media and Copyright Law by our neighbor school in Jackson. I had never even thought about social media, and so took the opportunity to explore the issue. This first talk has now turned into one of my major research focuses this year, and has brought new perspective to my work.

“Traditional Contours of Intellectual Property,” IP Works in Progress Conference, Houston, February 2012. The WIPIP conference (co-founded by our own Glynn Lunney) is one of two major IP conferences each year. This is the smaller, more intimate of the two, and so is usually the one I attend.

“Balancing on the Fine Tightrope of Copyright Law for Religious Organizations,” (invited talk) National Communicators Network for Women Religious, September 2011. I was contacted by Sister Barbara, who explained that the communication directors at churches around the country were suddenly having copyright issues. This provided an introduction to copyright, and in the process I began exploring religious and non-profit exceptions in the copyright act, which appear to need significant updating to keep up with technology.

“Traditional Contours of Ginsburg: Eldred versus Golan,” Faculty Workshop, Tulane University Law School, January 2012. This was the first time I presented the work in the DePaul paper, and got significant feedback, which helped the piece tremendously.

Roundtable Participation, Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, Invited, U.S. Copyright Office, June, 2011 I participated in nearly every panel over a two-day period at the Copyright Office. My comments were in part based on work we had done in the Reply Comment (submitted by myself and my copyright course), and my own research in copyright and duration.

“The Durationator,” Google Invited Talk, Mountain View, February 2011 (invited) After numerous discussions with Google about the Durationator®, I was asked to present my work.

“What Should the Durationator® Be When it Grows up?” Innovate/Activate, NYLS, September 2010. This was my first social entrepreneurial conference, and I am told by organizer he is still using the Durationator® as an example of one of the projects coming out of academia.

“Towards a Constitutionally-Defined Public Domain,” Junior Faculty Forum, Loyola Law School, October 1, 2010. This presentation focused on my 104A work, what became the Columbia J. for Law and the Arts.

“Theorizing the Practical: the Underpinnings of the Durationator®, SEALS, August 2010. This was one of many conferences where I presented the work of the Durationator® within the context of a model for transforming research and theory into a tool and service for lawyers and non-lawyers.

“Section 104A: A Rant,” New Scholar Panel, SEALS, August 2010. Section 104A, which parsed carefully, makes no sense and is deeply flawed. I explained why and how.

“The Law is Everywhere: Thinking through the Holocaust Essay”, Faculty Brown Bag, Tulane University Law School, Summer 2010. This was my first thoughts on how to translate the work I did at the U.S. Holocaust Museum that summer in to an essay on the usefulness of the Holocaust in teaching basic concepts of law. The paper (in progress) argues that the extreme experiences of the Holocaust help us to highlight the impact and power of law on everyday lives.

“The Durationator® Revealed,” Copyright @ 300, UC Berkeley, April 2010 (invited speaker). I presented the Durationator® to the audience, and in particular, had created a historical path for the Statute of Anne (the topic of the conference). This was our first historical path. Since then, we have gone on to do China, Germany, United Kingdom, Estonia, Latvia, Russia, and Israel. We are working on others. A historical path means tracing the historical development of copyright through the statutory changes to better understand how one work’s copyright life looks.

Keynote Speaker, “Google Book Settlement and Academia”, James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona, November 2009 (invited) Invited by my copyright law professor back to my alma mater, I spoke for 45 minutes on the Google Book Settlement, which at the time, was a very new and key issues being discussed.

“The Making of the Durationator™”, IPSC 2009, Cardozo Law School, New York, August 2009 This was an early discussion of the ideas for the Durationator®.

Tulane Law School Summer Brown Bag Series, presentation and discussion of “Marked by Modernism” paper, Summer 2009 This co-authored piece with Ron Gard is the key to how we understand copyright in the Durationator®. We presented it to the faculty, as we were getting ready to publish the law review addition. The original shorter piece was published as part of a collection, “Copyright and Modernism” by Oxford University Press.

Wrestling with the 1909 Copyright Act, (invited speaker), Santa Clara University/U.C. Berkeley, 100th Anniversary of the 1909 Act, Spring 2009. This looked at the research I had done on the 1909 Copyright Act in relationship to how to determine the copyright status of those works today.

Is Linden Lab the Reluctant Post- Feudal King of Second Life? A Legal Analysis of the State of Nature in Virtual Property, Santa Clara University School of Law Symposium, February 1, 2008 (invited) This recounted the experiment of taking 100 1L property students into the virtual world of Second Life. A published version of our experiment appeared as part of the Symposium.

The Durationator® Experiment, WIPIP, Tulane University, October 3-4, 2008. This was an early presentation to the IP scholars as a group, as part of our hosting WIPIP.

"Copyright for Historians: A Philosophy," UCLA History Department (invited talk), October 2007. Going back to my alma mater for my graduate and undergraduate work, I was invited to talk about copyright law in relationship to archival materials.

"The Impossibilities of a Usable Past: Struggling with Copyright Duration in the Basement at the New Orleans Public Library," Works-in-Progress Intellectual Property Conference at American University, September, 2007. This paper focused on the difficulties of using the Copyright Office recordings of the past, and what needs to be done to make determining the copyright status of works more accessible.

"Vera Brittain, Section 104(a) and Section 104A: A Case Study in Sorting out Duration of Foreign Works under the 1976 Copyright Act, Intellectual Property Scholars Conference, DePaul University School of Law, August 9-10, 2007 This was an early version of my 104A work that focused on my dissertation subject, Vera Brittain. This version of the paper never has been published, but has some important information, which is available on SSRN.

Are We Merely Theorizing an Unpublished Public Domain?, Works in Progress Intellectual Property, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, October 6-7, 2006 This was a portion of my job talk, and looks at the changes in copyright law of bringing unpublished works under federal law. This greatly ties into my more recent work on sound recordings.

Unpublished Works in the Public Domain: A Legal Assessment at Three, Intellectual Property Scholars Conference, UC Berkeley, August 10-11, 2006 This was a different portion of my job talk, and looks at the changes in copyright law of bringing unpublished works under federal law. This greatly ties into my more recent work on sound recordings.

January 1, 2003 - the Birth of the Unpublished Public Domain in the US: The International Implications, Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, University of London, April 24, 2006 This was an early version of my 303(a) work, which compared copyright in the U.S. to U.K. It was here that I realized the significant differences in outcomes depending on jurisdiction regarding the copyright status of works, and could be seen as moving me closer to my vision of what became the Durationator® Copyright Experiment.

Legal Issues in Podcasting the Traditional Classroom (Two Part Podcast with Colette Vogele), HigherEdBlogCon 2006: Transforming Academic Communities with New Tools of the Social Web, April 3, 2006 Colette Vogele (now Microsoft attorney) and I did a two part recorded Power Point presentation for a virtual conference.

"Archivists, Copyright, and Digitization," Society of American Archivists' 2005 Annual Meeting, New Orleans, August 2005.

"Copyright and a Scholar's Work," California Archivist Society, San Francisco, July 22, 2005.

"American Women in World War I," The Great War Society Annual Conference, Los Angeles, April 2005.

"The Politics of Remembering (in) War," Cultural Studies Association, Tucson, Arizona, April 2005.

"The Making of the Unpublished Public Domain," Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, Palo Alto California, February 2005.

"Gender and Geographies of Bodies in War: A Defining a War Generation Through the War Hospital," War in Film, Television and History Conference, Dallas, November 2004.

"Legal Possession in a Digital Age: A.S. Byatt's Novel as Understanding Ownership and Possession in Copyright," Law and Culture panel, National Popular Culture Conference, Philadelphia, April 2001.

BLOGGING and MEDIA

Interview for “Faculty Cry Foul over IP Policy at U. Louisiana System,” Chronicle of Higher Education, February 16, 2012 (http://chronicle.com/article/Faculty-Cry-Foul-Over/130800/) My work on the “teacher exception” (published in 2003) still brings queries. This was a question in response to the latest IP policy here in Louisiana.

Interview for “Copyright Ruling has Scholars’ Attention,” Tulane New Wave, August 1, 2011 (available at http://tulane.edu/news/newwave/080111_copyright.cfm) This was regarding the Golan case, and was in response to the Chronicle of Higher Ed article.

Interview for “Supreme Court Takes Up Scholars' Rights” Chronicle of Higher Education interview, May 29, 2011 (available at http://chronicle.com/article/A-Professors-Fight- Over/127700/) This was regarding the Golan case.

Hour-Long Guest, "Hearsay Culture" Radio Show with David Levine, Stanford, Fall 2009 This focused on the Durationator® Copyright Experiment. The “Hearsay Culture” show that looks at technology and IP related issues, and features one guest for an hour.

New Faculty Blog, (weekly) Tulane Law School, 2007-2009 Susan Krinsky asked me to write this blog about my experiences of being new to New Orleans in a post-Katrina environment. It documented our family adventures around town, with the goal being to make NOLA seem less scary, particularly for potential female students. Guest Blogging, Terra Nova, April 2007 Innovation Profile (hour-long interview), Law School Innovation Blog, July 14, 2007, http://lsi.typepad.com/lsi/2007/07/innovator-profi.htm

Invited Guest, The State of Play Academy, (hour-long virtual presentation in There.com), Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School, Spring 2007.

The Fizzy Project, (13 screencasts created by 100 1L property students at Seattle University, comparing real property and virtual property), Spring 2007.

Hour-Long Guest, "Hearsay Culture" Radio Show with David Levine, Stanford, October 2006

Academic Copyright (personal blog), http://academiccopyright.typepad.com. 2004-2007

SERVICE AT TULANE

Highlighted Committee Work

Tulane Law School, Library Committee, Chair, 2018-2019 Tulane Law School Faculty Technology Committee, 2010-2011 Tulane IT Senate Committee, 2008-2009 Tulane Law School Intellectual Life Committee, 2007-2009, 2011-2012 Tulane Law School Academic Affairs Committee, 2009-2010 Chair, Subcommittee for Faculty Senate, IP Policy Review, 2017-

Faculty Advising Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Faculty Co-Advisor, 2009- Tulane Technology and IP Society, 2007- I have also advised many, many students over the last five years.

IP-Related Service

Legal Board, Organization for Transformative Use, 2016-

Director and Founder, Tulane Center for IP Law and Culture, 2009-

Director, “Future of Copyright” Speaker Series, 2009, 2011 (including interviews conducted for the Tulane IP journal)

AALS IP Section, Co-organizer (with Glynn Lunney and others) of January 2010 event at Tulane University, New Orleans

Committee Member, Umbrella Policy Committee of Louisiana Statewide Colleagues Collaborative and The Association of Louisiana Faculty Senates (LSCC and ALFS) (invited)

Co-Organizer, Works in Progress Intellectual Property Colloquium, Tulane Law School, October 2008. In 2008, we hosted the IP Works in Progress Conference, bringing over 40 IP scholars to Tulane to discuss their latest ideas and papers. The Intellectual Life committee gave us funds for the dinner, and each speaker paid his/her own way. As part of that conference, I was able to present the Durationator® Copyright Experiment to the entire conference. It was our first major presentation of the work.

Future of Copyright Speaker Series, 2009 and 2001 Thanks to a Research Enhancement Grant (2009) and the Intellectual Life Committee (2011), we have been able to put on two speaker series, consisting of six speakers each, discussing their vision and hopes for the future. Our goal was to raise the profile of Tulane by demonstrating to the speakers the brilliance of our students. For each speaker, we collectively as a class (the copyright class), read all of their works of our speakers, and then prepared questions for an interview. Each speaker presented their vision of the future at a talk, was interviewed by the students and IP journal students, and had their interview transcribed as an article. Some of our speakers also contributed their own law review articles to the IP journal. The SBA, the IP society and the JTIPS all participated and helped with funding receptions. We also republished Pam Samuelson’s timely letters to Judge Chin regarding the proposed Google Book settlement, which I wrote an introduction as well. All of our speakers are key scholars and practioners in the field: Pamela Samuelson (Berkeley), Jamie Boyle (Duke), Graeme Dinwoodie (Oxford), Mark Rose (UCSB), Diane Zimmerman (NYU), Peter Jaszi (American), Jule Sigall (Microsft), David Carson (U.S. Copyright Office), Kenneth Crews (Columbia), Jane Ginbsurg (Columbia), Siva Vaidhyanathan (University of Virginia) and Nina Paley (independent film maker). The Speaker Series, in its design, was very student- centered. Students chauffeured our speakers, took them on tours of the French Quarter and 9th Ward, attended lunches, had great discussions, hosted receptions, and interviewed our speakers. We have gotten tremendous feedback on the Speaker Series and that the speakers were impressed with our students’ knowledge (Jamie Boyle in the elevator was in a bit of a panic that his talk would be too simplified for the crowd awaiting him in the classroom after his morning interview and lunch with students). We hope to continue the speaker series in the future.

Guest Speakers, Spring 2010 and Spring 2012 We were also able to attract two additional speakers, who were unable to attend during the speaker series, but came the following year: Tony Reese (Irvine) and David Nimmer (“Nimmer on Copyright”). Both are very important in the field, and we were delighted to have them at Tulane Law School. David Nimmer, in fact, gave two presentations, one to the general students and one to 1L property students. The SBA, the IP society and the JTIPS all participated and helped with funding a reception. David Nimmer (whose daughter will now be a freshman in the Fall 2013 at Tulane) is interested in teaching annually a 1-unit course, thanks in part to his visit and experience here.

AALS IP Receptions Glynn Lunney and I have worked with other schools to organize an IP reception when the AALS is in town, again raising our profile. The schools that have pitched in with funding are top IP schools. Our first reception took place at Tulane Law School, and we invited people from around New Orleans to come speak about interesting cultural happenings post- Katrina. We also catered the event from Café Reconcile. In January 2013, we hosted another reception, this time at the Idea Village. The reception was co-sponsored by NYU. Each of these receptions were attended by 50-60 IP scholars from around the country.

Development of Non-Resident IP Fellows Program Some of our students want to be involved in the field of intellectual property, but are taking jobs in other areas; others are having a difficult time finding any job. I started the non-resident IP fellows program to fill both needs. Modeled after the Stanford Center for Internet and Society non-resident fellow program, each fellow is given a title and encouraged to work on their own projects. We are working on the website, and we hope to have them also blogging and engaging in social media for the Center.

CultureFest at Tulane Law School As a way of bringing the school together, I created a day of art and culture at Tulane Law School, where students, faculty and staff were encouraged to bring in their art and crafts, which were displayed in the Multipurpose Room. We also had beignets for the school and served lunch to the school as well. We worked with SBA and the IP Society.

Employment and creation of Research Fellows Positions (3) I created three temporary positions for three of our post-J.D. students, who were still looking for jobs and were will to continue for six months working on the Durationator® Research Project. These were funded in part by the Research Enhancement Grant and also an IDEA Grant from the Technology Transfer. Evan Dicharry, Justin Levy and Benjamin Varadi, all of who have gone on to employment. Evan Dicharry is now at Phelps Dunbar. Benjamin Vardi has started his own firm. Justin Levy works at Tech Transfer at Tulane. I have been told that his work on the Durationator® and interaction with John Christie significantly contributed to his hiring. This is particularly terrific, as Justin had wanted to pursue the tech transfer avenue as a career path. Ben Varadi is now teaching a law and technology course at Loyola, in part based on the work he did as a research assistant here at Tulane.

Legal Reviewer and Advisor, Center for Social Media/American University Best Practices in Poetry Project, 2010 (invited by Peter Jaszi)

Stanford Fair Use Project – Legal Research Assistance (including assistance on U.S. Supreme Court brief, Golan v. Holder), 2009- (Invited by Tony Falzone)

Electronic Frontier Foundation – Legal Research Assistance, 2010-

Quid Pro Books – Legal Research Assistance, 2010-

Legal Research, Media NOLA, 2008-

Legal Research, Amistad Research Center, Tulane University 2007-

Legal Research Assistance Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2010-

Legal Research Assistance, Quid Pro Books. 2010-

Additional Service Tulane Law School Blog, 2007-2009, documenting our experiences as a family who moved to New Orleans. Susan Krinsky asked me to blog weekly to make people feel comfortable that New Orleans was recovering from Katrina.

Advisory Board, ChangeMaker Institute, Tulane University, 2012-2014 (invited)

DURATIONATOR® COPYRIGHT EXPERIMENT

This project has grown over the last five years. We have formed a Tulane spin-out company, Limited Times, LLC. We also have patents (through Tulane University) pending in the U.S., Canada, China, Australia, Russia, among others. We are also working with Idea Village and others to create a business plan. • We have been cited by the Supreme Court (Breyer, dissent in Golan v. Holder, 2012) regarding the project. • We have created our Copyright Advisory Board, which includes Kenneth Crews (Columbia), Anthony Falzone (Stanford Fair Use Project, now Pinterest), Peter Hirtle (Cornell), Peter Jaszi (American), Deborah Gerhardt (University of North Carolina), Daniel Gervais (Vanderbilt), Paul Goldstein (Stanford), Glynn Lunney (Tulane University), Pamela Samuelson (U.S. Berkeley), Roberta Kwall (DePaul), David Nimmer (Nimmer on Copyright), Julie Samuels (EFF), and Jule Sigall (Microsoft). • We have also begun working with our Strategic Research/Testing partners at University of Michigan Library, NYARC (a three library consortium, (Brooklyn Museum, MOMA, and the Frick Collection), LOUIS Library Consortium, MediaNOLA, Amistad Research Center, Quid Pro Books, Tulane University, and with individual scholars, artists, and writers. Tulane Law School faculty who have asked Durationator® questions include Joel Friedman, Marjorie Kornhauser, Tina Boudreaux and Alan Childress. • We have coded over 100 countries, most of U.S. law, researched nearly 200 countries and dependencies, and have begun historical research paths for the U.K., U.S., Israel, Latvia, China, Hong Kong, Macau, Germany, Estonia, and Russia.

SELECTED ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT Law Clerk, NAFTA Arbitration Panel2000-2003 Working for Professor David Gantz and Michael Hathaway, I assisted on two NAFTA cases for which they served as panelists: the Chapter 20 cross- border trucking case (decided Feb 6, 2001), and a Chapter 11 investment case (the Feldman case). Duties include editing for substance, structure and style, cite-checking, and formatting the final version of the panel decision. Project Director, Preparing for Lives in the Law2000-2003 Working with Toni Massaro, Dean of the James E. Rogers College of Law, I assisted in the development of a series of videos that utilize over forty interviews I conducted with alumni lawyers and judges residing in Arizona, Nevada, and California in order to understand the culture and issues surrounding the practice of law. Additional responsibilities included y early presentations at the Board of Visitors meetings as well as at other alumni and fundraising functions.

Summer Associate, Quirk and Tratos, Las Vegas, NevadaSummer 2000 I worked on copyright litigation cases, trademark applications, and copyright registrations. I also researched an appeal to the Copyright Office for copyrights that had been denied.

PROFESSIONAL ACTING While completing my studies at UCLA, I also had the fortune to work as a professional actor, 1987-1994. This included co-starring roles in the feature film Mermaids (Orion Pictures, with Cher), the NBC Movie of the Week Winnie (with Meredith Baxter- Birney), the NBC pilot You Can't Take it With You (with Harry Morgan), the Second City series My Talk Show (as a series regular), the Disney/PBS movie Caddie Woodlawn, and smaller roles in other films and movies of the week. These experiences helped inform my views on IP and other related issues, including right of publicity and contract issues.