DOCSLIB.ORG

Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary Prepared for: Society of Ecosystem Restoration in North Central BC 1560 Highway 16 E, Vanderhoof, BC ,V0J 3A0 Submitted by: Ecofor Consulting Ltd. 140 Stuart Dr W. Fort St James, BC V0J 1P0 Canada Phone: 250-996-2151 Ecofor Contact: Mark Pokorski Date: 3 March 2017 SERNbc – Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary DOCUMENT INFORMATION Project Number: 2016-2083-001 File Number: Filename: 2016_SERNbc_SRPP_Summary.docx Document Revision: 0 REVISION HISTORY Reviewed Approved Rev.# Date of Issue Description By By 0 2017-03-03 CG MP Initial release 2016_SERNbc_SRPP_Summary.docx ecofor.ca Page ii Template Version: 10 SERNbc – Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 PLOT SELECTION ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 PLOT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3 RESULTS & DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 TREE CANOPY ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 REGENERATION AND SAPLINGS ................................................................................................................................................. 4 3.3 SHRUBS ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.4 UNDERSTORY...................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.5 COARSE WOODY DEBRIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.6 WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.7 UNIDENTIFIED PLANTS ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 4 CONTINUING/FUTURE WORK ................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 DATA ENTRY TRIAL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 5 CLOSURE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 6 LITERATURE CITED................................................................................................................................................... 10 APPENDICES Mapping ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Data Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Photodocumentation ................................................................................................................................................... 19 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Plot location and assessment dates for Stuart River PP in 2016 ......................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Summary of tree species and basal area in BAF 4 prism plots for Stuart River PP vegetation monitoring plots in 2016. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 3: Species of large shrub and tree sapling and regeneration layers in Stuart River PP vegetation monitoring plots in 2016. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2016_SERNbc_SRPP_Summary.docx ecofor.ca Page iii Template Version: 10 SERNbc – Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary Table 4: Average length along shrub transects and number of plots for each shrub species detected within Stuart River PP in 2016. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 5: Coarse woody degree ocular estimates for each plot in Stuart River PP in 2016. ........................................................ 6 Table 6: Total pellet groups for ungulate species detected at Stuart River PP in 2016. .............................................................. 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Den site located near Plot 1 in Stuart River PP. ......................................................................................................................... 7 2016_SERNbc_SRPP_Summary.docx ecofor.ca Page iv Template Version: 10 SERNbc – Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary 1 INTRODUCTION The Society for Ecological Restoration in Northern BC (SERNbc) has an ongoing restoration program at Stuart River Provincial Park near Fort St James, BC. The site was treated with prescribed burns in 2002, 2009, and 2014 with the intent of increasing and maintaining the amount of grassland area present. Vegetation monitoring was previously conducted 2006 (Sharp 2006), 2009 (Albertson 2009), and 2012 (FLNRO; unpublished data). Ecofor Consulting Ltd (Ecofor) was retained by SERNbc to conduct vegetation monitoring as per the Prescribed Burn Monitoring Protocol for Omineca Region, British Columbia (Rooke et al 2015). This document summarizes the work conducted at the Stuart River Provincial Park (PP) by Ecofor in 2016. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The vegetation monitoring plots in Stuart River PP are located approximately 34 km south of the town of Fort St James, BC. The approximate centre point of the sampling area is at UTM coordinates (NAD 83) Zone 10U, 442926 E, 6007546 N. The site can be accessed by road by following the Necoslie Forest Service Road (FSR) southeast from Vanderhoof for 33 km, then following the Charlie FSR for approximately 5 km (UTV/ATV maybe required during wet conditions). Access to the plots by foot is possible from this road. The Project area is comprised mainly of a matrix of grassland, shrubs and regenerating forest varying in composition on a south facing hillside. Mature mixed forest is present in most locations at the top and bottom of the slope. 1.2 OBJECTIVES The monitoring objectives were to collect data to characterize changes in vegetation composition and stand structure resulting from the prescribed burn. 2 METHODS The Prescribed Burn Monitoring Protocol for Omineca Region, British Columbia (Rooke et al 2015) was used as the guideline for the survey methods. 2.1 PLOT SELECTION Ten plot locations were established during the original monitoring visit in 2006 (Sharp 2006). Plots were marked with a 1 m length of steel rebar. All plots were located in areas that were burned (i.e. no control plots). Relocation of the original plot center rebar markers was not possible in most cases. There were abundant fallen logs and dense shrubs in many locations, which made finding the rust-coloured rebar difficult or prevented it altogether. The original rebar was located at plots 7, 8, 9, and 10. At the other plots, the GPS point from 2009 was used to locate the plot centre. 2016_SERNbc_SRPP_Summary.docx ecofor.ca Page 1 Template Version: 10 SERNbc – Stuart River Provincial Park 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Summary 2.2 PLOT ASSESSMENT In 2006, 2009, and 2012 the plots were assessed using the Stuart River Prescribed Fire Monitoring Protocol (Simonar and Migabo 2006). In 2009, no data was collected for Plot 7, since the survey crew found that GPS coordinates and site characteristics did not match the 2006 data. Plot 7 appears to have been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study On
    Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study on the Enbridge Gateway Pipeline An Assessment of the Impacts of the Proposed Enbridge Gateway Pipeline on the Carrier Sekani First Nations May 2006 Carrier Sekani Tribal Council i Aboriginal Interests & Use Study on the Proposed Gateway Pipeline ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study was carried out under the direction of, and by many members of the Carrier Sekani First Nations. This work was possible because of the many people who have over the years established the written records of the history, territories, and governance of the Carrier Sekani. Without this foundation, this study would have been difficult if not impossible. This study involved many community members in various capacities including: Community Coordinators/Liaisons Ryan Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Bev Ketlo, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Sara Sam, Nak’azdli First Nation Rosa McIntosh, Saik’uz First Nation Bev Bird & Ron Winser, Tl’azt’en Nation Michael Teegee & Terry Teegee, Takla Lake First Nation Viola Turner, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Elders, Trapline & Keyoh Holders Interviewed Dick A’huille, Nak’azdli First Nation Moise and Mary Antwoine, Saik’uz First Nation George George, Sr. Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Rita George, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Patrick Isaac, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Peter John, Burns Lake Band Alma Larson, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Betsy and Carl Leon, Nak’azdli First Nation Bernadette McQuarry, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Aileen Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Donald Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Guy Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Vince Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Kenny Sam, Burns Lake Band Lillian Sam, Nak’azdli First Nation Ruth Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Ryan Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Joseph Tom, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Translation services provided by Lillian Morris, Wet’suwet’en First Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort St. James Guide
    Table of Contents Welcome Message ................... 3 Parks ............................... 10 Getting Here ........................ 6 Seasonal Activities ................... 11 Getting Around Town ................. 7 Remote Wildlife Experiences. 14 Unique to Fort St. James .............. 8 Trails ............................... 18 History ............................. 24 2 Welcome Message On the scenic shore of beautiful Stuart Lake is a community both historic and resourceful! Fort St. James offers an abundance of year-round recreational activities including hunting, fishing, trails for biking, hiking, motor sports, water sports, marina, and snow and ice sports. Established by Simon Fraser in 1806, the Fort St. James area is rich with historical significance. The geographically close communities of Fort St. James, Nak’azdli, Tl’azt’en and Yekooche First Nations played an integral role in developing the north. Beginning with the fur trade and building strong economies on forestry, mining, energy and tourism; Fort St. James is a resourceful place! It is also independent business friendly, providing resources and supports Fort St. James provides a safe and healthy community for entrepreneurs even being formally for families and gainful employment opportunities. recognized with a provincial “open for A College of New Caledonia campus, accompanied business” award. by three elementary schools and a high school keeps Fort St. James is a service centre for rural our innovative community engaged and educated. communities offering stores, restaurants, In addition to education, health is a priority with banking, accommodations and government our Stuart Lake Hospital and Medical Clinic and offices. Uniquely this town boasts an array of community hall for recreation. volunteer-driven organizations and services Whether you visit for the history or stay for the including a ski hill, golf course, theatre and resources, Fort St.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future Of..., 29 J
    Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of..., 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 2016 Article Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of Environmental Governance in Canada Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith a1 Copyright © 2016 by Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.; Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith This paper provides an introduction to sources of Indigenous law and the theoretical underpinnings of Indigenous law-based approaches to contemporary environmental management in Canada. It then explores three case studies of Indigenous peoples that have used approaches grounded in their ancestral legal traditions to confront contemporary threats to their lands and waters. These case studies highlight how the Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs, the Tsleil-Waututh Nation and the Yinka Dene Alliance have effectively drawn on and enforced their own laws in order to address challenges to the integrity of their respective territories from resource development. Finally, the paper comments on the significance of this revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions and their application to contemporary environmental problems in light of federal environmental deregulation. It posits that the current revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions should be of interest to anyone concerned with the question of environmental governance in Canada today. Dans cet article, les auteurs retracent les sources du droit autochtone et les bases théoriques des approches fondées sur le droit autochtone de la gestion environnementale contemporaine au Canada. Ils explorent ensuite trois situations où des peuples autochtones ont eu recours à des approches reposant sur leurs traditions juridiques ancestrales pour confronter des menaces contemporaines à leurs terres et eaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Sturgeon History
    Sturgeon Calendar Sturgeon History UNEL’TSOO’S LIFE 1920s: Unel’tsoo, the oldest sturgeon that has been caught GEOGRAPHICAL TIME by the NWSRI, hatched when the Rightly called a pre-historic species, white sturgeon ancestors lived Nechako River flowed naturally. during the time of the dinosaurs, 170-245 million years ago! Physically, 1940s: Sturgeon were caught not much has changed. Their large, flat cartilaginous body covered and sold for food in stores in in sharp bony plates are features that developed a time long ago. Vanderhoof and Prince George. During the last ice age 50,000-10,000 years ago British Columbia was covered People also fished for sturgeon in ice a kilometre deep. When the ice receded it created new waterways all the way until the 1970s. across North America. Dakelh Elders tell the story of when the river flowed Unelt’soo eluded the anglers. backwards - when the Stuart River flowed north instead of south into the 1952: Kenney Dam was built on Nechako River as it does today. These kinds of ancient water connections the Nechako River. It changed and pathways allowed fish species to move great distances between the hydrology* of the river. continents and over mountains. The white sturgeon likely made their way to Unelt’soo survived the flow the Nechako River from the Upper Columbia River over 10,000 years ago. changes in the river. *study of the movement of water DISTRIBUTION > CLICK FOR THE NECHAKO WATERSHED MAP 1960s: Unelt’soo finally reached Globally, sturgeon are found circum-polar in the northern hemisphere. White maturity, however it is likely that sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) very few of Unel’tsoo’s eggs and live on the west coast of North larvae did not survive after 1967, America, and the Nechako white when researchers realized that sturgeon - a unique group within young fish were not surviving.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Rivers: Central British Columbia
    Indian and Affaires indiennes Northern Affairs et du Nord Wild Rivers: Parks Canada Pares Canada Central British Columbia Published by Parks Canada under authority of the Hon. J. Hugh Faulkner, Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs, Ottawa, 1978 QS-7064-000-EE-A1 Les releves de la serie «Les rivieres sauvages» sont egalement publies en francais. Canada Canada metric metrique Metric Commission Canada has granted use of the National Symbol for Metric Conversion. Wild Rivers: Central British Columbia Wild Rivers Survey Parks Canada ARC Branch Planning Division Ottawa, 1978 2 Cariboo and Quesnel rivers: Ishpa Moun­ tain from Sandy Lake 3 'It is difficult to find in life any event and water, taken in the abstract, fail as which so effectually condenses intense completely to convey any idea of their nervous sensation into the shortest fierce embracings in the throes of a possible space of time as does the rapid as the fire burning quietly in a work of shooting, or running an im­ drawing-room fireplace fails to convey mense rapid. There is no toil, no heart the idea of a house wrapped and breaking labour about it, but as much sheeted in flames." coolness, dexterity, and skill as man can throw into the work of hand, eye Sir William Francis Butler (1872) and head; knowledge of when to strike and how to do it; knowledge of water and rock, and of the one hundred com­ binations which rock and water can assume — for these two things, rock 4 ©Minister of Supply and Services Now available in the Wild River Metric symbols used in this book Canada 1978 series: mm — millimetre(s) Available by mail from Printing and Alberta m — metre(s) Publishing, Supply and Services Central British Columbia km — kilometre(s) Canada, Ottawa, K1A 0S9, or through James Bay/Hudson Bay km/h - kilometres per hour your bookseller.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Spatial and Temporal Variability of Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change in the Fraser River Basin, British Columbia, Canada
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES Hydrol. Process. (2012) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9283 Modelling spatial and temporal variability of hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Fraser River basin, British Columbia, Canada Rajesh R. Shrestha,* Markus A. Schnorbus, Arelia T. Werner and Anne J. Berland Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University House 1, PO Box 3060 Stn CSC, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8W 3R4 Abstract: This paper presents a modelling study on the spatial and temporal variability of climate-induced hydrologic changes in the Fraser River basin, British Columbia, Canada. This large basin presents a unique modelling case due to its physiographic heterogeneity and the potentially large implications of changes to its hydrologic regime. The macro-scale Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrologic model was employed to simulate 30-year baseline (1970s) and future (2050s) hydrologic regimes based on climate forcings derived from eight global climate models (GCMs) runs under three emissions scenarios (B1, A1B and A2). Bias Corrected Spatial Disaggregation was used to statistically downscale GCM outputs to the resolution of the VIC model (1/16). The modelled future scenarios for the 11 sub-basins and three regions (eastern mountains, central plateau and coastal mountains) of the FRB exhibit spatially varied responses, such as, shifts from snow-dominant to hybrid regime in the eastern and coastal mountains and hybrid to rain-dominant regime in the central plateau region. The analysis of temporal changes illustrated considerable uncertainties in the projections obtained from an ensemble of GCMs and emission scenarios. However, direction of changes obtained from the GCM ensembles and emissions scenarios are consistent amongst one another.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002/03 Preliminary Assessment of Stuart Watershed White Sturgeon (Acipenser Transmontanus
    2002/03 Preliminary Assessment of Stuart Watershed White Sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Prepared by the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council 2ndFloor, 1460 Sixth Ave. Prince George, B.C. V2L 3N2 June 2003 Prepared For The NEC~iW~ WHITESTURGEON .,. RECOVERY INITIATIVE - - 2002/03 Preliminary Assessment of Stuart Watershed White Sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Prepared For The NEC~~~~ WHITESTURGEON RECOVERY INITIATIVE cIa Don Cadden, R.P.8io., Chair, NWSRI Recovery Team Section Head, Fish &Wildlife Science & Allocation Environmental Stewardship Division Ministry of Water, land & Air Protection 405118-th Ave. Prince George BC, V2N 183 Prepared by the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council 2ndFloor, 1460 Sixth Ave. Prince George, B.C. V2L 3N2 Brian M.Toth, R.P.Bio.1and Jason A. Yarmish2 1 Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, 2ndFloor, 1460 Sixth Ave., Prince George, B.C., V2L 3N2 2 Lheidli T'enneh Band, Natural Resource Office, #105 2288 Old Cariboo Hwy., V2N 6G3 - ---- Carrier Sekani TribalCouncil Nechako White Sturgeon Recovery Initiative Habitat Conservation Trust Fund Acknowledaements The 2002/03 Preliminary Assessment of Stuart Watershed White Sturgeon was a culmination of the efforts of numerous persons. Dennis Ableson, former CSTC Fisheries Program Biologist, provided the initial impetus for initiating this undertaking. Golder Associates Ltd. completed a multi-year study design for the program and provided overall scientific direction to the activities undertaken in 2002/03, including field staff training and reviewing drafts of this report. Members of the Recovery Team of the Nechako White Sturgeon Recovery Initiative provided recommendations as to the format of the study as well as providing funding for the initiative through the Habitat Conservation Trust Fund (HCTF).
    [Show full text]
  • Rubyrock Lake Ps.Pdf
    Rubyrock Lake Provincial Park Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan Rubyrock Lake Provincial Park is located about 70 kilometres northwest of Fort St. James, bordered by three large lakes: Trembleur to the northeast; Cunningham to the southwest; and to the southeast, the north arm of Stuart Lake. This large park (41,233 hectares) provides the best representation of the Babine Upland Ecosection, contributing 54.98% of the overall protected areas system representation of this ecosection. This ecosection is fragmented and poorly represented in the provincial protected areas system (only 3.65% protected). Rubyrock Lake Provincial Park is characterized by broken terrain dotted with numerous small lakes and wetlands. Close to 80% of the park supports sub- boreal spruce forests, nearly half of which is the moist, cool sub-boreal spruce variant. The park also provides important representation of moist very cold Englemann spruce – subalpine fir forests. One blue-listed ecosystem is found in the park - hybrid white spruce / hardhack (Picea engelmannii x glauca / Spiraea douglasii) SBS dw3 (06), which is dominated by Douglas-fir, saskatoon and false sarsaparilla. Rubyrock Lake Provincial Park is one of the few areas that capture unique Douglas-fir shoreline ecosystems. Diverse habitats within the park include important moose and mule deer winter range, waterfowl migration stopover and nesting grounds, good aquatic furbearer habitat, and fish habitat. The park supports a wide variety of wildlife species, including grizzly bear, moose, mule deer, furbearers and waterfowl. Fish species in the area include kokanee, rainbow trout, lake trout, burbot, as well as a small run of sockeye salmon. Sockeye salmon spawn in Fleming, Paula, Sydney and Cunningham creeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Language. Legemds, Amd Lore of the Carrier
    SUBMITTED TO REV. H. POUPART. O.M.I., PH.D. in ii lusrgaccfc i n 11 gc—Majsmi ••• IIIIWHWII i ini DEAN OP THE FACULTY OF ARTS | LANGUAGE. LEGEMDS, AMD LORE OF THE , 1 : V CARRIER IKDIAHS ) By./ J-. B- . MUKRO\, M.S.A. Submitted as Thesis for the Ph.D. Degree, the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. UMI Number: DC53436 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform DC53436 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Foreword Chapter 1 A Difficult Language .... 1-16 Chapter 2 Pilakamulahuh--The Aboriginal Lecturer 17 - 32 Chapter 3 Lore of the Pacific Coast . 33-44 Chapter 4 Dene Tribes and Waterways ... 45-61 Chapter 5 Carriers or Navigators .... 62-71 Chapter 6 Invention of Dene Syllabics . 72-88 Chapter 7 Some Legends of Na'kaztli ... 89 - 108 Chapter 8 Lakes and Landmarks .... 109 - 117 Chapter 9 Nautley Village and Legend of Estas 118 - 128 Chapter 10 Ancient Babine Epitaph ...
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Through Toponymy: Using Indigenous Place-Names in Outdoor Science Camps
    Teaching Through Toponymy: Using Indigenous Place-Names In Outdoor Science Camps Karen Ann Heikkila B.A., University of British Columbia, 1994 B.Ed., University of British Columbia, 1995 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Natural Resources and Environmental Studies (Geography) The University of Northern British Columbia January 2007 ©Karen Ann Heikkila, 2007 For All who teach and make known the Dakelh language and culture Abstract The naming of places, be they landforms, villages or cities, is a cultural phenomenon dating back to the earliest of times. Naming to identify and differentiate places seems to be as basic a need as assigning names to the persons and objects that make up one’s world. In the Tl’azt’en culture, where oral transmission was the means of passing down knowledge, people developed particular strategies for recalling information. Routes to hunting grounds or fishing holes, for instance, were memorized with the aid of place-names and through the narratives that illumined the named places. This study examines the potential of Dakelh place-names as a tool for educating Tl’azt’en children and youth about the Tl’azt’en ancestral past, the Dakelh language and places on the land that have sustained Tl’azt’enne for generations. The processes of colonization, resistance and cultural reclamation as observed in the naming and re-naming of places provides a theoretical framework from which to explore the potential of indigenous place-names to address issues of cultural revitalization and identity-strengthening. Such theory enables understanding of the importance of indigenous language and places on the land in sustaining cultural identity and forming the basis for appreciating oral tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands for Returned Soldier Settlement Near Fort St
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF LANDS REPORT ON THE SUBDIVISION OF CERTAIN LANDS FOR RETURNED SOLDIER SETTLEMENT NEAR FORT ST. JAMES, STUART LAKE, COAST DISTRICT RANGE FIVE By J. H. GRAY, B.C. L.S. PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C.: Printed by WILLIAM H. CULLIX, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty, 1919. FOREWORD. By Order in Council dated August 9th, 1918, certain lands in the Stuart Lake and Stuart River Valleys were reserved for soldier-settlement purposes. A large amount of the land included in this reserve was formerly held under applications lo purchase and surveyed as such into blocks of 640 acres each. During the summer of 1918 Mr. J. H. Graj', B.C.L.S., was emploj^ed in charge of a party on the sub­ division of these lots into areas of approximately 160 aci*es each. The following is Mr. Gray's general report on the area covered by this work. T. D. PATTULLO, Minister of Lands. Victoria, B.C., January, 1919. Report on the Subdivision of certain Lands for Returned Soldier Settlement near Fort St. James, Stuart Lake, Range 5, Coast District. • SITUATION AND EXTENT. The tract subdivided this season and examined in detail consists in all of 61,359 acres' . situated upon either side of Stuart River, directly south and east of Fort St. James, at east end of Stuart Lake. THREE GROUPS. This entire area, on account of location aud physical variety has been divided into three groups—viz., A, B, and C—to which reference shall be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Nak'azdli 'Ink'ez Tl'azt'en Wheni Noh Bulh Yas'ulhtuk
    Nak’azdli ‘ink’ez Tl’azt’en Wheni noh bulh yas’ulhtuk Nak’azdli and Tl’azten: We Are Telling You AK’AZD N L I TS’UMUS LH YO U O O L B U A S J I L H Y O O L O K W U N EN B BA WHUT’ A N D IL COUNC AK’AZD N L I TS’UMUS LH YO U O O L B U A S J I L H Y O O L O K W U N EN BA WHUT’ W H UT’EN AK’AZD N L I TS’UMUS LH YO U O O L B U A S J I L H Y the northern way of caring O O L O K W U N EN B BA WHUT’ A N D IL COUNC AK’AZD N L I TS’UMUS LH YO U O O L B U A S J I L H Y O O L O K W U N EN BA WHUT’ W H UT’EN the northern way of caring ’AZD AK L N I ’UMUSY TS OO LH L U U O S B I L Y A O J O H O L KW N U T’E N BA WHU B L A I N C D COUN ’AZD AK L N I ’UMUSY TS OO LH L U U O S B I L Y A O J O H O L KW N U T’E N BA WHU W the northern way of caring HUT’EN Northern Health is committed to partnering with First Nations and Aboriginal peoples and to building a health system that honours diversity and provides services in a culturally safe and relevant manner.
    [Show full text]