DOCSLIB.ORG

Inhalt Vier Jahrzehnte Liberaler Politik

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inhalt Vier Jahrzehnte Liberaler Politik Inhalt WOLFGANG MISCHNICK Zum Geleit 9 OTTO GRAF LAMBSDORFF Vorwort 13 Vier Jahrzehnte liberaler Politik HEINO KAACK Die FDP im politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 19 Die Gründung der Freien Demokratischen Partei DIETER HEIN Der Weg nach Heppenheim 1945-1948 48 THEO RÜTTEN Von der Plattform-Partei zur Partei des _ liberalen Programms 1949-1957 66 Zeitzeugen: Liberale der ersten Stunde GÜNTHER SERFAS Gespräch mit Wolfgang Haußmann (März 1988) 81 HELGA LERCH Der Abgeordnete und Unternehmer Karl Atzenroth 93 http://d-nb.info/881467189 6 Inhalt Zwischen Opposition und Regierung ig$7-1967 UDO WENGST Mit und gegen Adenauer und Erhard 102 FRITZ FLISZAR Mit der FDPregieren Ein Gespräch mit Erich Mende (7. Juni 1988) 125 DANIEL KOERFER Schwierige Geburten: Die Regierungsbildungen 1961, 1962, 1963 und 1965 156 Die Liberalen von 1967 bis heute ULRICH WILDERMUTH Von der FDP zur F.D.P. 194 HARTMUT HAUSMANN Die Freiburger Thesen 21 j GERD RAUHAUS In der sozial-liberalen Koalition 229 JOHANNES MERCK Von der sozial-liberalen zur bürgerlich-liberalen Koalition 246 Themen und Perspektiven liberaler Politik MARTIN BANGEMANN Liberale Wirtschaftspolitik 285 IRMGARD ADAM-SCHWAETZER Die Kontinuität liberaler Außenpolitik 297 GERHART RUDOLF BAUM Liberaler Rechtsstaat 308 DIETER-JULIUS CRONENBERG Liberale Gesellschaftspolitik 323 Inhalt GUIDO WESTERWELLE Die Jungen Liberalen 342 HELMUT HAUSSMANN Perspektiven des Liberalismus 347 ACHIM RHODE Die FDP in Ländern und Kommunen 364 Die FDP und die liberale Tradition WOLFGANG J. MOMMSEN Zwei Jahrhunderte Liberalismus in Deutschland 377 MARION GRÄFIN DÖNHOFF Die liberale Idee ist so stark wie eh und je 415 HILDEGARD HAMM-BRÜCHER Liberale Symbolfiguren: Theodor Heuss und Walter Scheel 419 WOLFGANG SCHOLLWER Liberale Führungspersonen - die Parteivorsitzenden 440 40 Jahre FDP - Die Sicht der anderen HELMUT KOHL Regieren mit der FDP 467 FRANZ JOSEF STRAUSS Zum Verhältnis von FDP und CSU 478 HANS-JOCHEN VOGEL Regieren mit der FDP 492 THOMAS SCHMID Zum Verhältnis von FDP und Grünen 499 SIMONE VEIL Die FDP und die Liberalen in Europa 517 Inhalt Anhang Heppenheimer Proklamation vom 12. Dezember 1948 531 Der Bundesvorstand von Heppenheim 1948 534 THEODOR HEUSS Unsere deutsche Mission 536 THOMAS DEHLER Auftrag und Verantwortung der freien Demokratie 549 REINHOLD MAIER Das wollen wir 573 RALF DAHRENDORF Politik der Liberalität statt Bündnis der Unbeweglichkeit 596 WALTER SCHEEL Zum Mißtrauensvotum der CDU/CSU-Fraktion 1972 616 HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER Brief an die Mandats- und Funktionsträger der FDP vom 20. August 1981 623 WOLFGANG MISCHNICK Rede im Deutschen Bundestag vom 1. Oktober 1982 631 Wahlergebnisse der FDP 1946-1988 644-647 Die Bundesvorsitzenden der FDP und ihre Stellvertreter seit 1948 648 Ehrenpräsidenten, Ehrenvorsitzender und Generalsekretäre der FDP 650 Die Fraktionsvorsitzenden der FDP im Deutschen Bundestag 651 Die FDP in den Bundeskabinetten 652 Die Autoren 654 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fortress Europe: the Ym Th Martin Bangemann
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 9 Issue 3 Winter Winter 1989 Fortress Europe: The yM th Martin Bangemann Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Trade Commons Recommended Citation Martin Bangemann, Fortress Europe: The yM th, 9 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 480 (1988-1989) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Fortress Europe: The Myth Martin Bangemann * The anticipation of the 1992 continental-wide market has already had an unexpected effect: one-third of the average 3.7% increase in eco- nomic growth of the European Community for 1988 is the result of in- vestors anticipating the big market.' This is the clearest signal the business community could make to show its confidence in Europe. This is the beginning of the most extensive exercise of deregulation the Euro- pean Community has experienced since its creation in the 1950s. Every- body agrees that it is an irreversible trend. Long gone is the "benign neglect" of those on Wall Street and Penn- sylvania Avenue that led the United States press to coin the sinister "Europessimism" concept of the early 1980s. Indeed, during last year, many East Coast analysts depicted Europe as a five trillion dollar econ- omy, thus granting the EC the economic powerhouse status it deserves.2 But awe often goes hand in hand with envy, which has resulted in the fashionable East Coast notion of "Fortress Europe." Before killing this myth, one crucial but often forgotten issue must be clarified: there is indeed nothing more legitimate for the Community than wanting to achieve one single market, abolishing national frontiers, and letting goods, persons, services and capital circulate freely.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 European/American Relations Over the S.D.I
    1 EUROPEAN/AMERICAN RELATIONS OVER THE S.D.I. CHARLES J. BALL Submitted for the Ph.D. Degree London School of Economics University of London July 1991 UMI Number: U042872 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Disscrrlation Publishing UMI U042872 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I H F POLITICAL W o A o. tOMlC^ yâ.\\L\Z<S\-yi ABSTRACT This thesis examines the dispute that arose between the United States and key European members of NATO (Britain, West Germany and France) over the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). The debate is traced from its inception on March 23, 1983, when Reagan announced his decision to accelerate ballistic missile defence research, to the eclipse of SDI as a major source of transatlantic and international controversy when Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev signed the INF Treaty in December 1987. The transatlantic SDI debate is investigated to determine: (1) the underlying cause, or reasons, for the controversy, (2) how the Alliance managed the differences which arose, and (3) how East- West relations affected the manner in which the controversy was handled.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Europe and the Global Information Society
    Bulletin of the European Union Supplement 2/94 Growth, competitiveness and employment White Paper follow-up Report on Europe and the global information society Interim report on trans-European networks Progress report on employment Extracts of the conclusions of the Presidency of the Corfu European Council This document reproduces the infonnation society report on pages 5-39 and the Presidency conclusions on pages 126- 134. The other two reports are available as separate documents on AEI-EU. Blank page not reproduced: 8 European Commission Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1994 ISBN 92-826-8547- (Q ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels. Luxembourg, 1994 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Germany General contents Europe and the global information society Recommendations of the high-level group on the information society to the Corfu European Council (Bangemann group) Trans-European networks Interim report of the chairman of the group of personal representatives of the Heads of State or Government to the Corfu European Council (Christophersen group) Progress report on employment 103 Results of Mr Flynn s tour of capitals Extracts of the conclusions of the Presidency of the Corfu European Council (24 and 25 June 1994) 125 S. 2/94 Europe and the global information society Recommendations of the high-level group on the information society to the Corfu European Council (Bangemann group) In its Brussels meeting of December 1993, the European Council requested that a report be prepared for its meeting on 24 and 25 June 1994 in Corfu by a group of prominent persons on the specific measures to be taken into consideration by the Community and the Member States for the infrastructures in the sphere of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Antrag Der Abgeordneten Alois Graf Von Waldburg-Zeil, Dr
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 12/2726 12. Wahlperiode 03.06.92 Antrag der Abgeordneten Alois Graf von Waldburg-Zeil, Dr. Winfried Pinger, Klaus-Jürgen Hedrich, Dr. Karl-Heinz Hornhues, Dr. Volkmar Köhler (Wolfsburg), Anneliese Augustin, Jürgen Augustinowitz, Wolfgang Dehnel, Jochen Feilcke, Karin Jeltsch, Michael Jung (Limburg), Ursula Männle, Dr. Christian Ruck, Ulrich Schmalz, Andreas Schmidt (Mülheim), Christian Schmidt (Fürth), Otto Regenspurger, Joachim Graf von Schönburg-Glauchau, Dr. Harald Schreiber, Wolfgang Vogt (Düren), Michael Wonneberger, Volker Kauder, Erika Reinhardt, Heribert Scharrenbroich, Dr. Renate Hellwig, Dietrich Austermann, Heinz-Günter Bargfrede, Richard Bayha, Meinrad Belle, Dr. Sabine Bergmann-Pohl, Dr. Joseph-Theodor Blank, Renate Blank, Wilfried Böhm (Melsungen), Dr. Maria Böhmer, Wolfgang Börnsen (Bönstrup), Paul Breuer, Klaus Bühler (Bruchsal), Peter Harry Carstensen (Nordstrand), Albert Deß, Maria Eichhorn, Dr. Karl H. Fell, Herbert Frankenhauser, Erich G. Fritz, Hans-Joachim Fuchtel, Peter Götz, Claus-Peter Grotz, Carl-Detlev Freiherr von Hammerstein, Klaus Harries, Udo Haschke (Jena), Manfred Heise, Dr. h. c. Adolf Herkenrath, Ernst Hinsken, Josef Hollerith, Dr. Dionys Jobst, Dr.-Ing. Rainer Jork, Steffen Kampeter, Dr.-Ing. Dietmar Kansy, Dr. Franz-Hermann Kappes, Franz Heinrich Krey, Dr.-Ing. Paul Krüger, Dr. Ursula Lehr, Christian Lenzer, Editha Limbach, Dr. Manfred Lischewski, Dr. Dietrich Mahlo, Claire Marienfeld, Erwin Marschewski, Dr. Martin Mayer (Siegertsbrunn), Wolfgang Meckelburg, Dr. Hedda Meseke, Maria Michalk, Alfons Müller (Wesseling), Johannes Nitsch, Friedhelm Ost, Ulrich Petzold, Rosemarie Priebus, Dr. Bertold Reinartz, Franz Romer, Kurt J. Rossmanith, Helmut Sauer (Salzgitter), Ortrun Schätzle, Heinz Schemken, Trudi Schmidt (Spiesen), Wolfgang Schulhoff, Gerhard Schulz (Leipzig), Dr. Hermann Schwörer, Wilfried Seibel, Dr. Hans-Joachim Sopart, Bärbel Sothmann, Karl-Heinz Spilker, Erika Steinbach-Hermann, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag Gesetzentwurf
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 14/0 14. Wahlperiode 03.04.2001 Gesetzentwurf der Abgeordneten Hans-Joachim Otto (Frankfurt), Rainer Funke, Prof. Dr. Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Ina Albowitz, Dr. Klaus Kinkel, Gerhard Schüßler, Dr. Hermann Otto Solms, Hildebrecht Braun, Rainer Brüderle, Ernst Burgbacher, Ulrike Flach, Horst Friedrich, Hans-Michael Goldmann, Joachim Günther, Dr. Karl-Heinz Guttmacher, Klaus Haupt, Dr. Helmut Haussmann, Ulrich Heinrich, Walter Hirche, Birgit Hombur- ger, Dr. Werner Hoyer, Dr. Heinrich L. Kolb, Gudrun Kopp, Jürgen Koppelin, Ina Lenke, Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, Dirk Niebel, Günther Friedrich Nolting, Detlef Parr, Cornelia Pieper, Dr. Irmgard Schwaetzer, Dr. Max Stadler, Carl-Ludwig Thiele, Dr. Dieter Thomae, Jürgen Türk, Dr. Wolfgang Gerhardt und der Fraktion der F.D.P. Entwurf eines Gesetzes für eine Reform des Stiftungszivilrechts (Stiftungsrechtsre- formgesetz) A. Problem Am 14. Juli 2000 wurde im Deutschen Bundestag die Reform des Stiftungssteuerrechts beschlossen. Damals kündigte die Bundesregierung die Vorlage eines Gesetzentwurfs zur Reform des Stiftungszivilrechts an. Zwar hat sich mittlerweile eine Arbeitsgruppe des Bundes und der Länder der Thematik angenommen. Prak- tikable Ergebnisse stehen aber bis heute aus. Ob in absehbarer Zeit mit einem Regierungsentwurf zur Reform des Stiftungsrecht gerechnet werden kann, hat die Bundesregierung in ihrer Antwort auf eine entsprechende Kleine Anfrage der F.D.P.-Bundestagsfraktion (Drucksache 14/5055) offen gelassen. Über die Parteigrenzen hinweg besteht aber weiterhin Einigkeit darin, daß eine weitere Stärkung der Stiftungskultur in Deutschland ein modernes Stiftungsrecht voraussetzt. In der Praxis verzweifeln potentielle Stifter immer wieder an den bürokratischen Strukturen der Stiftungsbe- hörden. Zudem gelten Stiftungen und ihre Tätigkeiten in der Öffentlichkeit immer noch als wenig transpa- rent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Osthandel: West German-Soviet Trade and the End of the Cold War, 1969-1991
    The Importance of Osthandel: West German-Soviet Trade and the End of the Cold War, 1969-1991 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Charles William Carter, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Professor Carole Fink, Advisor Professor Mansel Blackford Professor Peter Hahn Copyright by Charles William Carter 2012 Abstract Although the 1970s was the era of U.S.-Soviet détente, the decade also saw West Germany implement its own form of détente: Ostpolitik. Trade with the Soviet Union (Osthandel) was a major feature of Ostpolitik. Osthandel, whose main feature was the development of the Soviet energy-export infrastructure, was part of a broader West German effort aimed at promoting intimate interaction with the Soviets in order to reduce tension and resolve outstanding Cold War issues. Thanks to Osthandel, West Germany became the USSR’s most important capitalist trading partner, and several oil and natural gas pipelines came into existence because of the work of such firms as Mannesmann and Thyssen. At the same time, Moscow’s growing emphasis on developing energy for exports was not a prudent move. A lack of economic diversification resulted, a development that helped devastate the USSR’s economy after the oil price collapse of 1986 and, in the process, destabilize the communist bloc. Against this backdrop, the goals of some West German Ostpolitik advocates—especially German reunification and a peaceful resolution to the Cold War—occurred. ii Dedication Dedicated to my father, Charles William Carter iii Acknowledgements This project has been several years in the making, and many individuals have contributed to its completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Deutscher Teilnehmer Bilderberg
    • Egon Bahr (1968, 1971, 1982, 1987), German Minister, creator of the Ostpolitik • Rainer Barzel (1966), former German opposition leader • Kurt Biedenkopf (1992), former Prime Minister of Saxony • Max Brauer (1954, 1955, 1958, 1963, 1964, 1966), former Mayor of Hamburg • Birgit Breuel (1973, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994), chairwoman of Treuhandanstalt • Andreas von Bülow (1978), former Minister of Research of Germany • Karl Carstens (1971), former President of Germany • Klaus von Dohnanyi (1975, 1977), former Mayor of Hamburg • Ursula Engelen-Kefer (1998), former chairwoman of the German Confederation of Trade Unions • Björn Engholm (1991), former Prime Minister of Schleswig-Holstein • Ludwig Erhard (1966), former Chancellor of Germany • Fritz Erler (1955, 1957, 1958, 1963, 1964, 1966), Socialist Member of Parliament • Joschka Fischer (2008), former Minister of Foreign Affairs (Germany) • Herbert Giersch (1975), Director, Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel • Helmut Haussmann (1979, 1980, 1990, 1996), former Minister of Economics of Germany • Wolfgang Ischinger (1998, 2002, 2008), former German Ambassador to Washington • Helmut Kohl (1980, 1982, 1988), former Chancellor of Germany • Walter Leisler Kiep (1974, 1975, 1977, 1980), former Treasurer of the Christian Democratic Union (Germany) • Kurt Georg Kiesinger (1955, 1957, 1966), former Chancellor of Germany • Hans Klein (1986), Member of German Bundestag • Otto Graf Lambsdorff (1980, 1983, 1984), former Minister of Economics of Germany • Karl Lamers (1995), Member of the
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Long Form
    10/3/93 (Final alterations: 6/11/99) GERMANY Data on Party Leadership Change (from Leader A to Leader B) First Form for Party Party: Christian Democratic Union Party Founding Date: October, 1950 Long Record #: G.C.0 Change#: 0 A. Venue of Leadership Position(s) of leadership involved: Chancellor or Party Chairman B. Identification/Characteristics of Leaders Leader A: Konrad Adenauer Characteristics of Leader A at time of leadership change: Birthdate: January, 1876 (Former) occupation: Assistant state prosecutor, city administrator, deputy for the city of Cologne, Chairman of the British Zone. Faction/tendency identified with (if any): None Other relevant information on the new leader's character, orientation, leadership style, etc.: Strongly anti-utopian and was fundamental in pushing for a more pragmatic platform. Highly influential party leader. 10/3/93 (Final alterations: 6/11/99) GERMANY Data on Party Leadership Change (from Leader A to Leader B) Party: Christian Democratic Union Long Record #: G.C.1 Change #: 1 Date of Change: October, 1963 A. Venue of Leadership Position(s) of leadership involved: Chancellor or Party Chairman B. Identification/Characteristics of Leaders Leader A: Konrad Adenauer (See previous record for detailed information on Leader A) Leader B: Ludwig Erhard Characteristics of Leader B at time of leadership change: Birthdate: February 4, 1897 (Former) occupation: Trained in economics and sociology, he joined the staff of Nuremberg Business school from 1928-1942. Removed by Nazis for refusal to join party. After war, he joined the government as an economist. Faction/tendency identified with (if any): None Other relevant information on the new leader's character, orientation, leadership style, etc.: Promoted a "social market economy," favored free markets, but controls on monopoly, cartels and labor unions.
    [Show full text]
  • West German Politics in German Reunification
    Breakthroughs in Bonn: West German Politics in German Reunification Karen Brglez, University of Winnipeg The reunification of Germany on October 3, 1990 ushered in the end of the Cold War profoundly reshaping the center of Europe. The once most stable member of the Soviet bloc, the German Democratic Republic (GDR) was absorbed by the western capitalist Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) unifying the German state after more than forty years of separation. The unification of Germany- together with the peaceful end of the Cold War drastically transformed the political and security structures on the European continent. The Warsaw Pact collapsed and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was extended to the East.1 The Western democratic world had sealed a major victory over Soviet communist ideology. The road to German unification was achieved with profound political speed over the course of a single year. Numerous extraordinary developments initiated by different actors all had to come together at a politically opportune time to achieve unification. It was a rapid, but complex and multifaceted process. At the center of the process were the actions of the FRG steered by the Kohl government during this tumultuous period in German history. In the early months of 1989, Chancellor Kohl acted cautiously, carefully observing the economic and political changes taking place in the East. As revolutionary conditions developed into the fall he decisively made his move. Bonn’s central goal became unification and the government was able to achieve it by Kohl’s convincing offer both home and abroad of a humbled German nationalism that balanced a strong federal state with the promise of being fully committed and integrated into the European community and the western military alliance of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • "Trade and the Single Car Market: the EC-Japan Elements of Consensus
    Trade and the Single Car Market: The EC-Japan Elements of Consensus, 1985-1999 Grace Ballor Working Paper 21-145 Trade and the Single Car Market: The EC-Japan Elements of Consensus, 1985-1999 Grace Ballor Harvard Business School Working Paper 21-145 Copyright © 2021 by Grace Ballor. Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Funding for this research was provided in part by Harvard Business School. Trade and the Single Car Market: The EC-Japan Elements of Consensus, 1985-1999 Grace Ballor Harvard Business School On 18 July 1991, representatives from the European Community (EC) and Japan met at the Hague to sign a Joint Declaration. The two sides agreed to “strengthen their co-operation and partnership in order that the challenges of the future may be met,” deepening their commitment to cooperation after years of confrontation over trade deficits.1 Among the themes of the new partnership were pledges to coordinate their positions on a wide range of transnational challenges, from the environment and terrorism to the support of newly autonomous Central and Eastern European countries. But the crux of the agreement was oriented around the affirmation of “their common attachment to market principles, [and] the promotion of free trade.” By ensuring equitable access to their respective markets and removing obstacles to trade and investment, the EC and
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Gerry Alons Radboud University Nijmegen Citation Alons, G. (2013). ‘European External Trade Policy: The Role of Ideas in German Preference Formation’, Journal of Contemporary European Research. 9 (4), pp. 501-520. First published at: www.jcer.net Volume 9, Issue 4 (2013) jcer.net Gerry Alons In the literature examining European Union external trade policy, the relative influence of the Commission, the member states and interest groups are an issue of ongoing debate. This article will argue that member states can still play an important role and that a focus on member state preferences is therefore crucial in understanding European external trade policy in general. An interest-based explanation of state preferences is proposed in which both material (political and economic) and ideational variables are included, whereas material explanations alone dominate the current research in the trade policy field. An in-depth case study of German preference formation and position taking with regard to the agricultural chapter of the GATT Uruguay Round (1986-1993) shows the interplay between material and ideational interest. As well as German preference formation being guided by Germany’s trade interests and political interests (particularly when these interests were united and governmental sensitivity was high), considerations concerning the Franco-German friendship, affecting Germany’s ideational interest, also proved to be a constant in the preference-formation process. Germany; European trade policy; GATT Uruguay Round; Agriculture This article investigates German preferences with regard to the agricultural chapter of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Uruguay Round (1986-1993) and its role in European Union (EU) position taking in these negotiations.1 In the literature explaining European trade policy, the relative influence of the Commission, the member states and interest groups is an issue of ongoing debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Council of the European Communities : December 1989
    General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES December 1989 General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, December 1989 This publication is also available in the following languages: ES ISBN 92-824-0702-0 DA ISBN 92-824-0703-9 DE ISBN 92-824-0704-7 GR ISBN 92-824-0705-5 FR ISBN 92-824-0707-1 IT ISBN 92-824-0708-X NL ISBN 92-824-0709-8 PT ISBN 92-824-0710-1 Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1990 ISBN 92-824-0706-3 Catalogue number: BX-57-89-176-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1990 Printed in Belgium CONTENTS Page Council of the European Communities 5 Presidency of the Council 7 Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States 8 List of representatives of the governments of the Member States who regularly take part in Council meetings 9 Belgium 10 Denmark 11 Federal Republic of Germany 12 Greece 15 Spain 17 France 19 Ireland 21 Italy 23 Luxembourg 29 Netherlands 30 Portugal 32 United Kingdom 35 Permanent Representatives Committee 39 Coreper II 40 Coreper I 42 Article 113 Committee 44 Special Committee on Agriculture 44 Standing Committee on Employment 44 Budget Committee 44 Scientific and Technical Research Committee (Crest) 45 Education Committee 45 Committee on Cultural Affairs 46 Select Committee on Cooperation Agreements between the Member States and third countries 46 Energy Committee 46 Standing Committee on Uranium
    [Show full text]