Barite–Celestine Geochemistry and Environments of Formation Jeffrey S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky. -
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT for GYPSUM TELLS POSITIVE STORY by Karen Bernick
CCPs in Agriculture ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GYPSUM TELLS POSITIVE STORY By Karen Bernick mending soils with !ue “…the risk assessment has shown that FGD gypsum gas desulfurization (FGD) contains extremely low concentrations of most trace gypsum o"ers a host of promising bene#ts to elements, about the same as found in mined gypsum agriculture, and this bene#cial use and, in most cases, lower than background soils.” providesA an opportunity for power plants to reduce disposal costs. lead and arsenic trouble spots; and other Chaney says the only risk he has iden- But is it safe? contaminant risks in plant uptake and food. tified occurs if livestock producers He is the lead USDA researcher on the FGD allow ruminants to eat large quanti- $e answer appears to be a resounding gypsum risk assessment. ties of stockpiled gypsum. “If livestock “yes” according to early reports from a producers prevent ruminants from eat- comprehensive risk assessment by the $e USDA-EPA assessment exam- ing gypsum by fencing in stockpiles, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) ines what Chaney calls “new” FGD and limit grazing until after a rainfall to and U.S. Environmental Protection gypsum, a high quality form of syn- wash adhering FGD gypsum from for- Agency (EPA). $e assessment, likely thetic gypsum sought by agricultural age leaves, the sulfate risk is prevented,” to be concluded in 2013, addresses crop producers for its soil improvement he says. potential risks that land applications of bene#ts, calcium and sulfur supplies, FGD gypsum could pose to human health purity and relative low cost versus mined RISK ASSESSMENT or the environment. -
Gypsum and Carbon Amendment's
GYPSUM AND CARBON AMENDMENT’S INFLUENCE ON SOIL PROPERTIES, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, GROWTH AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RYEGRASS (Lolium perenne) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Maninder Kaur Walia, M.S. Environment and Natural Resources Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Warren A. Dick, Advisor Rattan Lal Brian K. Slater Frederick C. Michel,Jr. Copyrighted by Maninder Kaur Walia 2015 Abstract Gypsum is a source of calcium and sulfur that improves the physical and chemical properties of the soil. With the benefits associated with gypsum use and the increased availability of synthetic gypsum, its application to soil in Ohio and the Midwest is increasing. Several studies have focused on the effect of gypsum on soil properties. However, little is known about how gypsum affects C stocks in soils. In this study, in addition to gypsum, we also treated the soil with glucose to create a high level of CO2 in the soil profile, and contrasted that with the more slowly released C from plant residues. The overall goal of this dissertation research was to evaluate the effect of plant residues, glucose and gypsum on the growth and nutrient uptake of ryegrass, chemical properties (including total and inorganic C stock) and physical properties of two contrasting soils in Ohio (Wooster silt loam and Hoytville clay loam). Specific objectives of this research were to quantify the effect of (1) gypsum and plant residues on greenhouse gas emissions, (2) gypsum and C amendments on quality of leachate water, (3) gypsum and C amendments addition on C fractions in soils, (4) gypsum, plant residues and glucose addition on soil fertility, growth and nutrients concentrations of ryegrass and (5) gypsum, glucose and plant residues on selected soil physical properties and aggregate-associated C and N. -
“Mining” Water Ice on Mars an Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions
National Aeronautics and Space Administration “Mining” Water Ice on Mars An Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions Stephen Hoffman, Alida Andrews, Kevin Watts July 2016 Agenda • Introduction • What kind of water ice are we talking about • Options for accessing the water ice • Drilling Options • “Mining” Options • EMC scenario and requirements • Recommendations and future work Acknowledgement • The authors of this report learned much during the process of researching the technologies and operations associated with drilling into icy deposits and extract water from those deposits. We would like to acknowledge the support and advice provided by the following individuals and their organizations: – Brian Glass, PhD, NASA Ames Research Center – Robert Haehnel, PhD, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory – Patrick Haggerty, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Jennifer Mercer, PhD, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Frank Rack, PhD, University of Nebraska-Lincoln – Jason Weale, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Mining Water Ice on Mars INTRODUCTION Background • Addendum to M-WIP study, addressing one of the areas not fully covered in this report: accessing and mining water ice if it is present in certain glacier-like forms – The M-WIP report is available at http://mepag.nasa.gov/reports.cfm • The First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to Mars (October 2015) set the target -
Barite (Barium)
Barite (Barium) Chapter D of Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply Professional Paper 1802–D U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Periodic Table of Elements 1A 8A 1 2 hydrogen helium 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lithium beryllium boron carbon nitrogen oxygen fluorine neon 6.94 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 sodium magnesium aluminum silicon phosphorus sulfur chlorine argon 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B 8B 11B 12B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.06 35.45 39.95 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 potassium calcium scandium titanium vanadium chromium manganese iron cobalt nickel copper zinc gallium germanium arsenic selenium bromine krypton 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.93 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.64 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.79 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 rubidium strontium yttrium zirconium niobium molybdenum technetium ruthenium rhodium palladium silver cadmium indium tin antimony tellurium iodine xenon 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.96 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 cesium barium hafnium tantalum tungsten rhenium osmium iridium platinum gold mercury thallium lead bismuth polonium astatine radon 132.9 137.3 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 192.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (209) (210)(222) 87 88 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 -
2012 Bmc Auction Specimens
A SAMPLER OF SELECTED 2017 BMC AUCTION SPECIMENS (2017 Auction Date is Saturday, 21 January) Volume 3 3+ Hematite [Fe 2O3] & Quartz [SiO2] Locality Cleator Moor Iron Mines Cleator Moor West Cumberland Iron Field Cumbria, England, UK Size 13.5 x 9.5 x 7.0 cm 1498 g Donated by Stonetrust Hematite Crystal System: Trigonal Photograph by Mike Haritos Physical Properties Transparency: Subtranslucent to opaque Mohs hardness: 6.5 Density: approx 5.3 gm/cm3 Streak: Red Luster: Metalic Vanadinite [Pb5(VO4)3Cl] var. Endlichite Locality Erupción Mine (Ahumada Mine) Los Lamentos Mountains (Sierra de Los Lamentos) Mun. de Ahumada Chihuahua, Mexico Size 12.0 x 9.5 x 7.0 cm 1134 g Donated by Stonetrust Crystal System: Hexagonal Physical Properties Transparency: Subtranslucent to opaque Mohs hardness: 3.5-4 Photograph by Mike Haritos Density: 6.8 to 7.1 gm/cm3 Streak: Brownish yellow Endlichite, Pb5([V, As]O4)3Cl, is the arsenic rich Luster: Adamantine variety of vanadinite with arsenic atoms (As) substituting for some of the vanadium (V) 2+ Dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2] & Chalcopyrite [CuFe S2] Locality Picher Field Tri-State District Ottawa Co. Oklahoma, USA Size 19.0 x 14.5 x 6.0 cm 1892 g Consigned with Reserve by Stonetrust Dolomite Crystal System: Trigonal Physical Properties Photograph by Mike Haritos Transparency: Transparent, Translucent, Opaque Mohs hardness: 3.5 to 4 Density: 2.8 to 2.9 gm/cm3 Streak: White Luster: Vitreous Calcite [CaCO3] Locality Mexico Size 15.5 x 12.8 x 6.2 cm 1074 g Donated by Stonetrust Calcite Crystal System: Trigonal Physical Properties Transparency: Transparent, Translucent Mohs hardness: 3 Density: 2.71 gm/cm3 Streak: White Luster: Vitreous, Sub-Vitreous, Photograph by Mike Haritos Resinous, Waxy, Pearly Quartz [SiO2], var. -
Selective Flotation of Witherite from Calcite Using Potassium Chromate As a Depressant
Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 55(2), 2019, 565-574 Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing ISSN 1643-1049 http://www.journalssystem.com/ppmp © Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Received May 31, 2018; reviewed; accepted September 2, 2018 Selective flotation of witherite from calcite using potassium chromate as a depressant Yangshuai Qiu 1, Lingyan Zhang 1,2, Xuan Jiao 1, Junfang Guan 1,2, Ye Li 1,2, Yupeng Qian 1,2 1 School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China 2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Processing & Environment, Wuhan 430070, China Corresponding author: [email protected] (Lingyan Zhang) Abstract: Witherite has been widely used as an industrial and environmental source of barium, with calcite being the primary associated carbonate mineral. However, few studies have been conducted to effectively concentrate witherite from barium ores. In this work, with the treatment of potassium chromate (K2CrO4) and sodium oleate (NaOL), witherite was selectively separated from calcite through selective flotation at different pH conditions. In addition, contact angle, Zeta potential, adsorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed to characterize the separation mechanisms. The results demonstrated that NaOL had a strong collecting ability for both witherite and calcite; nevertheless, witherite could be effectively selected from calcite with the highest recovery at pH 9 in the presence of K2CrO4. From the XPS measurements, NaOL and K2CrO4 were found to be primarily attached to the surfaces of witherite and calcite through chemisorption. The presence of K2CrO4 on the surface of calcite adversely influenced the NaOL adsorption, which could make the flotation separation efficient and successful. -
Moving Forwards
Recycling Today Magazine ~> Moving Forward Page 1 of 3 recvdin MoVing Forward By: Timothy G. Townsend May 2003 URL: http:llwww.recyclingtoday,com/arficles/article.asp?lD=4759&CafiD=&SubCatlD= Gypsum drywall is a major component of modern buildings, yet it is often one of the least likely components of debris frem building construction, demolition or renovation to be recycled. Gypsum drywall typically makes up 5 percent to 25 percent of the weight of debris from building-related C&D activities, A typical rule of thumb for drywall generation from construction activities is one pound of drywall per cubic foot of construction. The amount of post-consumer drywall generated in Florida C&D debris in 2000 was estimated at nearly 500,000 tons. Most of this was disposed in unlined landfills. Recovery and recycling is always desired in place of lend- filling when feasible, but several environmentel factors (odor, groundwater contamination) create added incentive for recycling d~JwalL While several gypsum drywall recycling operations exist in North America at the current time, in many areas (Florida for example) drywa!l recycling is relatively nonexistent. This paper describe~ some of the issues facing the C&D debris industry and summarizes the current state of gypsum drywall recycling in North America. DRYWALL BASICS Gypsum drywall, often referred to as gypsum wallbeard or sheet rock, replaced gypsum piaster as the major interior wall surface because of its ease of installation and its fire resistant properties. Gypsum drywal! consists of approximately 90 percent gypsum and 10 percent paper facing and backing. Gypsum is a mineral composed of calcium sulfate (CaSOL and water (H20). -
Conservation of Coated and Specialty Papers
RELACT HISTORY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TREATMENT OF SPECIALTY PAPERS FOUND IN ARCHIVES, LIBRARIES AND MUSEUMS: TRACING AND PIGMENT-COATED PAPERS By Dianne van der Reyden (Revised from the following publications: Pigment-coated papers I & II: history and technology / van der Reyden, Dianne; Mosier, Erika; Baker, Mary , In: Triennial meeting (10th), Washington, DC, 22-27 August 1993: preprints / Paris: ICOM , 1993, and Effects of aging and solvent treatments on some properties of contemporary tracing papers / van der Reyden, Dianne; Hofmann, Christa; Baker, Mary, In: Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 1993) ABSTRACT Museums, libraries, and archives contain large collections of pigment-coated and tracing papers. These papers are produced by specially formulated compositions and manufacturing procedures that make them particularly vulnerable to damage as well as reactive to solvents used in conservation treatments. In order to evaluate the effects of solvents on such papers, several research projects were designed to consider the variables of paper composition, properties, and aging, as well as type of solvent and technique of solvent application. This paper summarizes findings for materials characterization, degradative effects of aging, and some effects of solvents used for stain reduction, and humidification and flattening, of pigment-coated and modern tracing papers. Pigment-coated papers have been used, virtually since the beginning of papermaking history, for their special properties of gloss and brightness. These properties, however, may render coated papers more susceptible to certain types of damage (surface marring, embedded grime, and stains) and more reactive to certain conservation treatments. Several research projects have been undertaken to characterize paper coating compositions (by SEM/EDS and FTIR) and appearance properties (by SEM imaging of surface structure and quantitative measurements of color and gloss) in order to evaluate changes that might occur following application of solvents used in conservation treatments. -
1469 Vol 43#5 Art 03.Indd
1469 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 43, pp. 1469-1487 (2005) BORATE MINERALS OF THE PENOBSQUIS AND MILLSTREAM DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA JOEL D. GRICE§, ROBERT A. GAULT AND JERRY VAN VELTHUIZEN† Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada ABSTRACT The borate minerals found in two potash deposits, at Penobsquis and Millstream, Kings County, New Brunswick, are described in detail. These deposits are located in the Moncton Subbasin, which forms the eastern portion of the extensive Maritimes Basin. These marine evaporites consist of an early carbonate unit, followed by a sulfate, and fi nally, a salt unit. The borate assemblages occur in specifi c beds of halite and sylvite that were the last units to form in the evaporite sequence. Species identifi ed from drill-core sections include: boracite, brianroulstonite, chambersite, colemanite, congolite, danburite, hilgardite, howlite, hydroboracite, kurgantaite, penobsquisite, pringleite, ruitenbergite, strontioginorite, szaibélyite, trembathite, veatchite, volkovskite and walkerite. In addition, 41 non-borate species have been identifi ed, including magnesite, monohydrocalcite, sellaite, kieserite and fl uorite. The borate assemblages in the two deposits differ, and in each deposit, they vary stratigraphically. At Millstream, boracite is the most common borate in the sylvite + carnallite beds, with hilgardite in the lower halite strata. At Penobsquis, there is an upper unit of hilgardite + volkovskite + trembathite in halite and a lower unit of hydroboracite + volkov- skite + trembathite–congolite in halite–sylvite. At both deposits, values of the ratio of B isotopes [␦11B] range from 21.5 to 37.8‰ [21 analyses] and are consistent with a seawater source, without any need for a more exotic interpretation. -
Evolution of the Astonishing Naica Giant Crystals in Chihuahua, Mexico
minerals Review Evolution of the Astonishing Naica Giant Crystals in Chihuahua, Mexico Iván Jalil Antón Carreño-Márquez 1 , Isaí Castillo-Sandoval 2, Bernardo Enrique Pérez-Cázares 3, Luis Edmundo Fuentes-Cobas 2 , Hilda Esperanza Esparza-Ponce 2 , Esperanza Menéndez-Méndez 4, María Elena Fuentes-Montero 3 and María Elena Montero-Cabrera 2,* 1 Department of Engineering, Universidad La Salle Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31625, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Department of Environment and Energy, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, Chihuahua 31136, Mexico; [email protected] (I.C.-S.); [email protected] (L.E.F.-C.); [email protected] (H.E.E.-P.) 3 Department of Computational Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31125, Mexico; [email protected] (B.E.P.-C.); [email protected] (M.E.F.-M.) 4 Department Physicochemical Assays, Instituto Eduardo Torroja de Ciencias de la Construcción, 28033 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Calcium sulfate (CaSO4) is one of the most common evaporites found in the earth’s crust. It can be found as four main variations: gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O), bassanite (CaSO4·0.5H2O), soluble Citation: Carreño-Márquez, I.J.A.; anhydrite, and insoluble anhydrite (CaSO4), being the key difference the hydration state of the Castillo-Sandoval, I.; Pérez-Cázares, sulfate mineral. Naica giant crystals’ growth starts from a supersaturated solution in a delicate B.E.; Fuentes-Cobas, L.E.; Esparza- thermodynamic balance close to equilibrium, where gypsum can form nanocrystals able to grow Ponce, H.E.; Menéndez-Méndez, E.; up to 11–12 m long. -
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.