WHO VBC 86.937 Eng.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHO VBC 86.937 Eng.Pdf I"' SSnce 1970 the Vector Biology and Control Division of has prep. with the assistame 02 collaborators outside tb Orgaaiaatioa, a number or paprs on vecto: +ol, The Zxpert Co on fnsecticideo held in October X974 (Tecbdcal Repart Series ME I recome&& that: theae doe-nts - general review@ of the ecology rtroz of indivfdual vector groups - should be continued an wlth upta+ate practicad infor~latzonon the parkfcular subject, f- '"55, with- the gtmat-el. ~emndfor ehPs saterfa3 for use as training and inf ,a gaides by different categ *E personnel, particalarly in the deti :ies, it was decgded to develop two separate rseriee of theae doc avanced series for M ,Sc, students in aedical entowlogy and ' profet~sfo~lstaff, an8 a ~liddl~~"leve1series for lea6 specialized r l the co=unity, The advanced series will cover the relevant subject in sore derail and at a higher technlca3 level. It i s believed that thir type of inforwtion 1 assist vector control specialists to acquire the knowledge required for theit daily work, Zn order to improve the value and usefulness of this gulide, eralu fortas are attached, and users are request4 to send the coapleted fornts to the I WO Divisfoa of Vector Biology and Control in Geneva sc that their comaeute sag be takea iato consideration when the guide 16 revised, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE VII. TEE HOUSE-FLY - BIOLOGY AMD CONTROL 3. Keiding Danish Pest Infestation Laboratory Lyngby, Denmark The issue of this document does not constitute Ce document ne constitue pas une publication, formal publication. It should not be reviewed, II ne doit faire I'objet d'aucun compte rendu ou abstracted, quoted or translated without the rdsume ni d'aucune citation ou traduction sans agreement of the World Health Organization. l'autorisation de I'Organisation mondiale de la Authors alone are responsible for views expressed SantB. Les opinions exprimhes dans les articles in signed articles. signds n'engagent que leurs auteurs. CONTENTS I Introduction ................................................................... I1 Taxonomy. nomenclature and geographical distribution ........................... I11 Life history. biology and ecology .............................................. 111.1 Life history ............................................................. 111.1.1 The eggs ......................................................... 111.1.2 The larv~ae ....................................................... 111.1.3 The pupae ........................................................ 111.1.4 The adult fly .................................................... 111.2 Breeding sources ......................................................... 111.2.1 Dung ............................................................. 111.2.2 Garbage and wastes from food processing .......................... 111.2.3 Organic manure other than dung ................................... 111.2.4 Sewage ........................................................... 111.2.5 Accumulations of plant material .................................. 111.3 Seasonal fluctuations and overwintering .................................. 111.4 Biology and behaviour of adult flies ..................................... 111.4.1 Feeding .......................................................... 111.4.2 Distribution by day and by night ................................. 111.4.3 Dispersion ....................................................... IV Public health importance of house-flies ........................................ IV.l Potential of flies for transmission of disease ........................... 1V.2 Important diseases that may be transmitted by non-biting flies under certain conditions ....................................................... IV.3 Fly nuisance ............................................................. V Fly control .................................................................... V.l Environmental sanitation and hygiene ..................................... V.l.l Elimination or reduction of fly breeding ......................... V.1.2 Elimination of sources that attract flies from other areas ....... V.1.3 Exclusion of flies from contact with materials containing pathogenic germs ................................................. V.1.4 Protection of food. utensils and man from contact with flies (non-chemical methods) ........................................... V.1.5 Education and public cooperation in environmental sanitation programmes ....................................................... V.2 Insecticidal control ..................................................... V.2.1 Larvicides ....................................................... V.2.2 Residual treatment of resting-sites .............................. V.2.3 Impregnated strips. cords. etc ................................... V.2.4 Toxic baits ...................................................... V.2.5 Space treatments and direct spraying of fly aggregations ........a V.2.6 Fumigation ....................................................... Page V.3 House-fly resistance to insecticides .................................... V.3.1 Development of resistance ........................................ V.3.2 Occurrence of resistance in various insecticides ................. V.3.3 Nature of resistance ............................................. V.3.4 Cross-resistance and multiple resistance ......................... V.3.5 Stability of resistance .......................................... V.3.6 Preventing or reducing the development of resistance ............. V.3.7 Significance of resistance for fly control ....................... V.4 Biological and other means of control .................................... V.4.1 Biological control and regulation of house-fly populations ....... V.4.2 Sterility methods and genetic control ............................ V.4.3 Trapping ......................................................... V1 Fly survey methods ............................................................. VI.l Counting flies on selected areas or attractants .......................... VI.l.l The fly grill count .............................................. VI.1.2 Counts of flies landing on baits ................................. VI.1.3 Counts or estimates on available surfaces ........................ VI.2 Trapping flies ........................................................... VI.2.1 Baited traps ..................................................... VI.2.2 Sticky traps ..................................................... VI.2.3 Light traps ...................................................... VI.3 Catching flies ........................................................... VI.3.1 Sweeps of net .................................................... VI.3.2 Movable suction device ........................................... VI.3.3 The fly cone ..................................................... VI.4 Counting fly specks ...................................................... c I Glossary ....................................................................... V111 Selected references ............................................................ IX Evaluation ..................................................................... A . Questionnaire for self-evaluation ........................................... B . Questionnaire for return to the Division of Vector Biology and Control ...... The common house-fly, kusca domestica L., has foll~wedman and been a nuisance to people all over the world wherever livestock are kept or garbage* accumulates (Fig. l). Musea domestica deserves its name as it is by far the most common fly in and around houses2 villages and in urban areas with insufficient sanitation. The house-fly is of public health importance, because it may transmit infections to food and people, and because it is a plague adding to the daily burden of people living under poor sanitary conditions, and Unacceptable where living conditions and hygiene are at a higher level. Fig. 1. Musca domestica domestica L. female (Denmark) M. domestica is a typical synanthropic* fly (syn-anthropic means together with E) as, with few exceptions, it is dependent on human settlements and activities, includi-ng the keeping of domestic animals, it breeds in human waste and manure of animals, it feeds on man's food and garbage, and uses human buildings for shelter. There are many other synanthropic flies of public health importance, which will not be dealt with in this brochure; however, M. domestica is the most common and widespread species*. The area of origin of M. domestica is not known, but its biology and distribution point t* a subtropical or tropical area in the Old World, perhaps East Africa, and it seems to have followed man from this earliest development. * The terms marked with an asterisk are defined in Section V11 - Glossary. WFI0/VBC/86.937 page 5 11. TAXONOMY*, NOMENCUTUTIE* AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION Classification of the Diptera* yf public health impurtance: arde r Diptera Flies suborders 3emat?cera1 Brachbcera2 Cyclo?rhapha3 I i 1 I Families ~ulicidae ~sychddidae ~imul/idae ~eratodogonidae Tabanidae Huscidae Glossinidae Calliphoridae ~es?ridae Hosquitos includes BlackfLtes Biting midges Horseflies House- Tsetse flies Blowflies, etc. Warble flies Sandf lies flies, etc. 1) Antennae* with many segments (>6) 2) Mainly large flies, antennae wirh three segments, the last being the largest 3) Antennae with three segments. The last bears a bristle called the arista*. M.
Recommended publications
  • Nuisance Insects and Climate Change
    www.defra.gov.uk Nuisance Insects and Climate Change March 2009 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Tel: 020 7238 6000 Website: www.defra.gov.uk © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2007 This publication is value added. If you wish to re-use this material, please apply for a Click-Use Licence for value added material at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/value-added-licence- information/index.htm. Alternatively applications can be sent to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ; Fax: +44 (0)1603 723000; email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Local Environment Protection Defra Nobel House Area 2A 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Email: [email protected] This document is also available on the Defra website and has been prepared by Centre of Ecology and Hydrology. Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2 An Investigation into the Potential for New and Existing Species of Insect with the Potential to Cause Statutory Nuisance to Occur in the UK as a Result of Current and Predicted Climate Change Roy, H.E.1, Beckmann, B.C.1, Comont, R.F.1, Hails, R.S.1, Harrington, R.2, Medlock, J.3, Purse, B.1, Shortall, C.R.2 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2Rothamsted Research, 3Health Protection Agency March 2009 3 Contents Summary 5 1.0 Background 6 1.1 Consortium to perform the work 7 1.2 Objectives 7 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Fauna of Livestock's of Marvdasht County of Fars Province In
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54 (1), pp. 85–98 (2019) DOI: 10.1556/038.54.2019.008 Fly Fauna of Livestock’s of Marvdasht County of Fars Province in the South of Iran A. ANSARI POUR1, S. TIRGARI1*, J. SHAKARAMI2, S. IMANI1 and A. F. DOUSTI3 1Department of Entomology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran 3Department of Plant Protection, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom Branch, Jahrom, Fars Iran (Received: 5 August 2018; accepted: 13 August 2018) Flies damage the livestock industry in many ways, including damages, physical disturbances, the transmissions of pathogens and the emergence of problems for livestock like Myiasis. In this research, the fauna of flies of Marvdasht County was investigating, which is one of the central counties of Fars province in southern Iran. In this study, a total of 20 species of flies from 6 families and 15 genera have been identified and reported. The species collected are as follows: Muscidae: Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, Musca autumnalis* De Geer, 1776, Stomoxys calci- trans** Linnaeus, 1758, Haematobia irritans** Linnaeus, 1758 Fanniidae: Fannia canicularis* Linnaeus, 1761 Calliphoridae: Calliphora vomitoria* Linnaeus, 1758, Chrysomya albiceps* Wiedemann, 1819, Lu- cilia caesar* Linnaeus, 1758, Lucilia sericata* Meigen, 1826, Lucilia cuprina* Wiedemann, 1830 Sarcophagidae: Sarcophaga africa* Wiedemann, 1824, Sarcophaga aegyptica* Salem, 1935, Wohl- fahrtia magnifica** Schiner, 1862 Tabanidae: Tabanus autumnalis* Linnaeus, 1761, Tabanus bromius* Linnaeus, 1758 Syrphidae: Eristalis tenax* Linnaeus, 1758, Syritta pipiens* Linnaeus, 1758, Eupeodes nuba* Wiede- mann, 1830, Syrphus vitripennis** Meigen, 1822, Scaeva albomaculata* Macquart, 1842 Species identified with * for the first time in the county and the species marked with ** are reported for the first time from the Fars province.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Burial of a Body on the Growth of Blowfly Larvae and Pupate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online 1 The colonisation of remains by the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) (Diptera: Muscidae) Alan Gunn* School of Natural Sciences & Psychology, John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT In the field, the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) only colonised buried baits in June, July and August. The two-species co- occurred on baits buried at 5cm but only M. prolapsa colonised baits buried at 10cm. Other species of insect were seldom recovered from buried baits regardless of the presence or absence of Muscina larvae. In the laboratory, both M. stabulans and M. prolapsa preferentially colonised liver baits on the soil surface compared to those buried at 5cm. Baits buried in dry soil were not colonised by either species whilst waterlogged soil severely reduced colonisation but did not prevent it entirely. Dry liver presented on the soil surface was colonised and supported growth to adulthood but if there was no surrounding medium in which the larvae could burrow then they died within 24 hours. M. stabulans showed a consistent preference for ovipositing on decaying liver rather than fresh liver, even when it had decayed for 41 days. The results for M. prolapsa were more variable but it was also capable of developing on both fresh and very decayed remains. Blood-soaked soil and dead slugs and snails stimulated egg-laying by both species and supported larval growth to adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Calyptratae
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile DOMÍNGUEZ, M. CECILIA; ROIG-JUÑENT, SERGIO A. Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 84, núm. 1, 2011, pp. 65-82 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944297005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FANNIIDAE (DIPTERA) 65 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84: 65-82, 2011 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Análisis biogeográfico histórico de la familia Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), con referencia especial a las especies australes del genero Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) usando análisis de dipersion-vicarianza M. CECILIA DOMÍNGUEZ* & SERGIO A. ROIG-JUÑENT Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), Centro Científico Tecnologico (CCT-CONICET, Mendoza), Av. Adrián Ruiz Leal s/n, Parque Gral. San Martin, Mendoza, Argentina, CC: 507, CP: 5500 *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to achieve a hypothesis explaining the biogeographical history of the family Fanniidae, especially that of the species from Patagonia, the Neotropics, Australia, and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Infectivity of Housefly, Musca Domestica
    b r a z i l i a n j o u r n a l o f m i c r o b i o l o g y 4 7 (2 0 1 6) 807–816 ht tp://www.bjmicrobiol.com.br/ Environmental Microbiology Infectivity of housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to different entomopathogenic fungi ∗ Muzammil Farooq, Shoaib Freed Bahauddin Zakariya University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Insect Microbiology and Biotechnology, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The housefly Musca domestica is a worldwide insect pest that acts as a vector for many Received 26 February 2014 pathogenic diseases in both people and animals. The present study was conducted to eval- Accepted 4 March 2016 uate the virulence of different local isolates of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Available online 4 July 2016 Isaria fumosorosea on M. domestica using two bioassay techniques: (1) adult immersion and Associate Editor: Carlos Pelleschi (2) a bait method applied to both larvae and adults. The results showed evidence of a broad Taborda range of responses by both stages (larvae and adults) to the tested isolates of B. bassiana, M. anisopliae and I. fumosorosea. These responses were concentration-dependent, with mor- Keywords: tality percentages ranging from 53.00% to 96.00%. Because it resulted in lower LC50 values and a shorter lethal time, B. bassiana (Bb-01) proved to be the most virulent isolate against Entomopathogenic fungi Fecundity both housefly larvae and adults.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Human Pathogens Carried by the Housefly
    Khamesipour et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:1049 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5934-3 REVIEWARTICLE Open Access A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.) Faham Khamesipour1,2* , Kamran Bagheri Lankarani1, Behnam Honarvar1 and Tebit Emmanuel Kwenti3,4 Abstract Background: The synanthropic house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), is a mechanical vector of pathogens (bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites), some of which cause serious diseases in humans and domestic animals. In the present study, a systematic review was done on the types and prevalence of human pathogens carried by the house fly. Methods: Major health-related electronic databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and Science Direct were searched (Last update 31/11/2017) for relevant literature on pathogens that have been isolated from the house fly. Results: Of the 1718 titles produced by bibliographic search, 99 were included in the review. Among the titles included, 69, 15, 3, 4, 1 and 7 described bacterial, fungi, bacteria+fungi, parasites, parasite+bacteria, and viral pathogens, respectively. Most of the house flies were captured in/around human habitation and animal farms. Pathogens were frequently isolated from body surfaces of the flies. Over 130 pathogens, predominantly bacteria (including some serious and life-threatening species) were identified from the house flies. Numerous publications also reported antimicrobial resistant bacteria and fungi isolated from house flies. Conclusions: This review showed that house flies carry a large number of pathogens which can cause serious infections in humans and animals. More studies are needed to identify new pathogens carried by the house fly.
    [Show full text]
  • GRE ® Chemistry Test Practice Book (PDF)
    GRE ® Chemistry Test Practice Book This practice book contains n one actual, full-length GRE® Chemistry Test n test-taking strategies Become familiar with n test structure and content n test instructions and answering procedures Compare your practice test results with the performance of those who took the test at a GRE administration. www.ets.org/gre Table of Contents Overview ..............................................................................................................3 Test Content ........................................................................................................3 Preparing for the Test ..........................................................................................4 Test-Taking Strategies .........................................................................................4 What Your Scores Mean ......................................................................................5 Taking the Practice Test ......................................................................................5 Scoring the Practice Test .....................................................................................5 Evaluating Your Performance ..............................................................................6 Practice Test .........................................................................................................7 Worksheet for Scoring the Practice Test ...........................................................51 Score Conversion Table ....................................................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies and Gnats Brochure (Printable)
    to develop eggs, and are attracted to exposed mucus in Another important step in fly management is to exclude the eyes, nose, mouth and even open wounds. Their them from the premises. Keep doors, windows and vents Who Should You Contact labium (lower lip) contains a spine that can introduce closed as much as practical, screen and seal around Coachella Valley Mosquito and pathogenic organisms which spread diseases known as these and other fly entry points. Automatic door closing Vector Control District What you “pink eye” ( conjunctivitis). devices and air curtain that blow air away from doorways 43-420 Trader Place can be installed to supplement an integrated fly manage- Indio, CA 92201 Adults are about 1/16 inch in length, shiny black to a dull ment program. (760) 342-8287 or (888) 343-9399 gray color with yellow or orange markings on the legs. should know In addition to swatting, mechanical controls include trap- Two population peaks are in late spring and in late sum- ping with sticky fly paper or ultraviolet light traps. The use mer or early fall. Daily activity peaks occur at sunrise and The Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control Dis- of pesticides is usually NOT the best means of managing about sunset during hot, dry weather, although eye gnat activity trict provides a limited fly and eye gnat control program fly populations. may occur in deep shade or on cloudy days. At night they known as “trapping out.” Thousands of traps with an rest at ground level or low shrubbery. Ideal temperature For eye gnats, removing decaying weeds, leaf litter, and egg based attractant are placed in golf courses and ag- for activity is 90F to 100F degrees, preferring higher tem- grass clippings, or drying organic matter and compost ricultural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 ETBA Newsletter
    East Texas Beekeepers Association June 6, 2019 June Report by Dick Counts Beekeepers should be periodically checking their hives for capped honey. You do not want to run out of space for your bees to store honey during the flow. If your super has eight frames of honey, add another super. It is time to start thinking about extracting. Soon, I will be setting up my extraction equipment in preparation for club extraction days. ETBA members are invited to use my equipment to extract their honey if they do not own or have access to another extractor. Extraction days can get pretty busy, so we have a few rules to make the process work smoothly. First you must be an ETBA member. Secondly, you must make an appointment and also tell me how many supers you will be bringing to extract. Please arrive about 15 minutes before your appointment time. My yard has limited space for parking so we try to not to have a large number of members arriving at the same time. Be aware that there will be a lot of bees flying all through the yard, so do not bring pets or unattended children. Bring a clean, dry wide-mouth container with a lid to collect your honey from the extractor. A food grade five gallon bucket works well. You can figure on two supers per bucket. You will fill your individual honey jars at home. Finally, get the bees off your supers before you arrive. Also have something to cover them or my bees will find them.
    [Show full text]
  • QM/MM Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Sulfite Oxidase
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN QM/MM study of the reaction mechanism of sulfte oxidase Octav Caldararu1, Milica Feldt 2,4, Daniela Cioloboc1, Marie-Céline van Severen1, Kerstin Starke3, Ricardo A. Mata2, Ebbe Nordlander3 & Ulf Ryde 1 Received: 29 November 2017 Sulfte oxidase is a mononuclear molybdenum enzyme that oxidises sulfte to sulfate in many Accepted: 28 February 2018 organisms, including man. Three diferent reaction mechanisms have been suggested, based on Published: xx xx xxxx experimental and computational studies. Here, we study all three with combined quantum mechanical (QM) and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods, including calculations with large basis sets, very large QM regions (803 atoms) and QM/MM free-energy perturbations. Our results show that the enzyme is set up to follow a mechanism in which the sulfur atom of the sulfte substrate reacts directly with the equatorial oxo ligand of the Mo ion, forming a Mo-bound sulfate product, which dissociates in the second step. The frst step is rate limiting, with a barrier of 39–49 kJ/mol. The low barrier is obtained by an intricate hydrogen-bond network around the substrate, which is preserved during the reaction. This network favours the deprotonated substrate and disfavours the other two reaction mechanisms. We have studied the reaction with both an oxidised and a reduced form of the molybdopterin ligand and quantum-refnement calculations indicate that it is in the normal reduced tetrahydro form in this protein. Molybdenum (Mo) is the only second-row transition metal that is used in biological systems1. It is employed in nitrogenases, as well as in a large group of molybdenum oxo-transfer enzymes.
    [Show full text]