Third Review of Action for Air

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Third Review of Action for Air THIRD REVIEW OF ACTION FOR AIR THE NSW GOVERNMENT’S 25 YEAR AIR QUALITY PLAN WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW INITIATIVES Total Environment Centre Inc www.tec.org.au November 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was produced by Leigh Martin, Karine Weiss and Chris Standen. Financial support was received from the Department of Environment and Climate Change. Our thanks to the following individuals, organisations and government agencies who provided information and comment on the various programs: Action for Public Transport Bicycle NSW Canterbury City Council Department of Environment and Climate Change Garry Glazebrook – University of Technology Sydney Harris Community Centre Phillip Laird – University of Wollongong Marrickville Council Pedestrian Council of Australia Residents Against Polluting Stacks (RAPS) Third review of Action for Air 2007 ABOUT TOTAL ENVIRONMENT CENTRE Total Environment Centre (TEC) was established in 1972 as an environmental advocacy centre. Since then it has worked on a wide range of environment protection campaigns - natural and urban, coastal and inland, country and city. Included has been air pollution and the sustainable city as an enduring concern. The Centre also provides public information on environmental concerns, such as toxic chemicals and safer alternatives, and provides assistance on how to run a campaign, deal with the media and lobby politicians. It undertakes environmental consultancies, organises conferences and publishes reports and books. Since 2003 TEC has also been undertaking the leading Green Capital program to encourage and support genuine moves by business towards social and environmental responsibility. The Centre is a non-profit, non-government organisation funded mainly by donations and project grants. Paid staff are assisted by volunteers. For more information on how to make a donation to Total Environment Centre, or to join in our work, visit our website – www.tec.org.au Total Environment Centre Level 4, 78 Liverpool Street Sydney PO Box A176 Sydney South NSW 1235 Ph: 09 9261 3437 Fax: 02 9261 3990 www.tec.org.au Third review of Action for Air 2007 CONTENTS Summary 2 Introduction 3 Part 1: Action for Air Progress to Date 5 OBJECTIVE 1 (see Table 1) 7 Strategy A – integrate urban infrastructure and transport planning 7 Strategy B – improve management of freight transportation 8 Recommendations OBJECTIVE 2 (see Table 2) 15 Strategy A – provide better public transport 15 Strategy B – provide for cycling and walking 19 Strategy C – change travel behaviour through education 19 Recommendations 20 OBJECTIVE 3 (see Table 3) 39 Strategy A – reduce car emissions 39 Strategy B – reduce diesel vehicle emissions 40 Strategy C – promote cleaner fuels 40 Recommendations 41 OBJECTIVE 4 (see Table 4) 52 Strategy B – develop cost effective approaches for small businesses 52 Recommendations 53 OBJECTIVE 5 (see Table 5) 59 Strategy A – reduce emissions from solid-fuel heaters 59 Strategy B – improve energy efficiency of homes 59 Recommendations 60 OBJECTIVE 6 (see Table 6) 65 Strategy A – manage the impact of open burning 65 OBJECTIVE 7 (see Table 7) 68 Strategy A – monitor, report, review 68 Recommendations 68 PART 2: Action for Air New Initiatives Curbing VKT and Reducing Vehicle Emissions 72 Road Supply Management 73 Demand management initiatives 73 Congestion charging/road pricing 73 Improving public transport infrastructure and services 78 Reducing/offsetting per VKT emissions 78 Indoor Air Quality 81 1. Introduce child-centred environmental health policy and regulation 82 2. Adopt a new regulatory framework for chemicals in Australia 3. Sponsor and promote prevention-orientated research 83 4. Undertake extensive community education campaigns Revising Action for Air 83 Part 3 Developing a National Template for Air Quality Management 84 Setting air quality targets 84 Setting VKT targets 84 Integrating planning and public transport 84 Reducing demand for vehicle use 84 Reducing vehicle emissions 84 Reducing point source emissions 85 Monitoring and reporting 85 Indoor air quality 85 References 86 Third review of Action for Air 2007 Page 1 SUMMARY With Action for Air approaching its tenth year the It is clear that a major effort is required to improve 2007 Clean Air Forum provides a timely opportunity public transport by investing in new infrastructure. to assess progress to date and focus on initiatives This should be coupled to strong demand for the future. Despite progress on reducing management measures such as congestion emissions from fixed sources, air quality goals for charging and a major overhaul of parking policies. ground level ozone and fine particles are regularly There is also a strong need to refocus Action for Air exceeded. This is likely to be directly attributable to to reflect new knowledge and information. In its the failure to meet targets for curbing growth in original form Action for Air did not address vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) and insufficient greenhouse gas emissions or indoor air quality. investment in public transport. Monitoring and reporting procedures adopted by Progress against each of the strategies in Action for Action for Air no longer reflect international best Air was assessed. The results show mixed practice. performance: Another concern is the degree of seriousness that Integrating urban infrastructure and public air quality is given in development decisions. There transport – poor are doubts that at the macro and regional planning Improving management of freight transportation – levels, institutional arrangements have the capacity poor to treat air quality as an eminent matter, even though it is mentioned in planning strategies. Providing better public transport – poor Providing for cycling and walking – average Action for Air should be revised and updated to address the various challenges. Changing travel behaviour through education – average TEC also recommends that the components in Reducing car emissions – good Action for Air and experience gained from the last ten years be a basis for a national template applied Reducing diesel emissions – good to capital cities in Australia, to protect air quality for Promoting cleaner fuels – good urban citizens. Reducing Industrial emissions – average Developing cost effective approaches for small businesses – average Reducing emissions from solid fuel heaters – average Improving energy efficiency of homes – good Managing the impact of open burning – good Monitoring, reporting and reviewing air quality - average Third review of Action for Air 2007 Page 2 INTRODUCTION Action for Air is the State Government’s 25 year plan under 10µm (PM10) are of greatest concern as they to improve air quality in the Greater Metropolitan are small enough to be inhaled and remain within Region of Sydney, the Illawarra and the Lower the respiratory system. Health effects associated Hunter. Launched in 1998 the aim of the plan is to with fine particles include increased hospital improve air quality in the Greater Metropolitan admissions and mortality from cardiovascular and Region (GMR) of Sydney, Newcastle and respiratory diseases, reduced lung function in Wollongong. It provides a framework for measures asthmatic children and respiratory problems in to improve air quality across a number of children. government agencies. Since Action for Air was first released in 1998, it has Action for Air seeks to improve air quality by tackling become apparent that very fine particles of 2.5µm or the two major pollution problems in the GMR - less (PM2.5) pose the greatest health risk as these photochemical smog and particle pollution. particles are inhaled more deeply into the very small airways of the lungs (DEC, 2006a). While an Photochemical smog is the result of the advisory reporting standard for PM was added to atmospheric reaction of oxides of nitrogen (NO ) 2.5 x the NEPM in 2003, there is currently no health and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), triggered based standard for these very fine particles. by sunlight. Major sources of VOCs are unburnt fuel emissions from vehicle exhausts, evaporative losses The main sources of fine particles are motor from vehicles and industries, solvents and vehicles (especially diesel), industry, and the vegetation (VOCs are sometimes also grouped commercial and domestic sector (particularly solid under the heading reactive organic compounds or fuel heaters). ROCs). Major NOx sources are emissions from Action for Air has seven principal objectives vehicles and industry. designed to reduce emissions of NOx, VOCs and The principal measure of photochemical smog is PM10: ground level concentrations of the major smog 1. Integrate air quality goals and transport component, ozone. Ground level ozone has been planning. shown to have adverse effects on human health including triggering asthma attacks and other 2. Provide more and better transport choices. respiratory problems and impairing immune 3. Make cars, trucks and buses cleaner. function. 4. Promote cleaner business. Apart from its role in producing ozone, nitrogen 5. Promote cleaner homes. dioxide (NO2) has also been found to trigger 6. Manage the impact of open burning. asthma and respiratory problems on its own. It has 7. Monitor, report and review air quality. also been found to increase the effects of some allergens and is associated with increased hospital Each of these objectives includes a range of admissions for heart disease. strategies and actions designed to improve air quality in the GMR. Particle pollution arises from a variety
Recommended publications
  • YEAR in REVIEW 2018/19 Contents
    YEAR IN REVIEW 2018/19 Contents 04 Chairman’s Message 05 CEO’s Message 06 Blacktown Venue Management Ltd 07 Blacktown Venue Management Ltd Board of Directors 08 Blacktown Key Venues 09 Blacktown Key Venues Management Staff 10 Health & Safety 12 Blacktown Football Park 15 Blacktown International Sportspark Sydney 16 AFL 19 Athletics 20 Baseball 22 Cricket 25 Football 27 Soft ball 28 Joe McAleer Oval 30 Blacktown Tennis Centre Stanhope 33 Blacktown Aquatic Centre 34 Blacktown Leisure Centre Stanhope 37 Charlie Lowles Leisure Centre Emerton 38 Mount Druitt Swimming Centre 40 Riverstone Swimming Centre Another fantastic year 43 Aqua Learn to Swim has passed with over 44 Looking forward 2.2 million visitors enjoying sport, leisure, 46 List of hirers recreation and fi tness outcomes across the 9 Key Venues facilities. 2 3 Chairman’s message As Chairman of Blacktown Venue Management Ltd., and on behalf of the Blacktown Venue Management Board of Directors it gives me great pleasure to welcome you to the 2018/19 Blacktown Key Venues year in review. I am honoured to take up the position as Chairman This commitment is demonstrated through the of Blacktown Venue Management Ltd (BVM). What endorsement by Blacktown City Council of the Blacktown an exciting time! We continue to make great progress International Sportspark Master plan. This Master towards delivery of our new state of the art International Plan will see the Sportspark at the forefront of sports Centre of Training Excellence (ICTE). The ICTE is a training and recovery through the inclusion of the ICTE Blacktown City transformational project that we are (International Centre of Training Excellence).
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Australia
    Unit 2 Place and liveability Living in Australia Both Indigenous Australians and early European settlers to Australia made decisions about where to live based on the availability of resources they needed to survive – things like water, food and shelter. The factors that influence where people live today are more varied. As well as needing access to food, water and shelter, people also choose where to live based on things like access to services (such as hospitals and schools), environmental quality (such as access to clean air and parklands) and safety. Connections to family, friends and places also influence where we live. Where we choose to live can also change over time due to a range of factors, such as work and property prices. In retirement, many people opt for a sea change or tree change to enjoy a more relaxed lifestyle. chapter Source 1 An oblique aerial photograph of the Melbourne showing the suburb of St Kilda in the foreground4 4A 4B DRAFT Where do Australians live and How do people connect why? to places? 1 What features shown in Source 1 tell you that many 1 What common interests or hobbies might people people live in the suburb of St Kilda? who live in St Kilda share? 2 Why do you think people choose to live in 2 How might the lifesavers at St Kilda Beach be St Kilda? considered a community of their own? 112 oxford big ideas humanities 7 victorian curriculum chapter 4 living in australia 113 4A Where do Australians live and why? Islander peoples have developed very strong connections with your learning 4.1 4.1 Why we live where we do their places.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Mccrindle Western Sydney Business Connection | 12 June 2014 Change
    Mark McCrindle Western Sydney Business Connection | 12 June 2014 Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Change. Only occasionally in history do massive technological trends combine with rapid demographic shifts and huge social change and ongoing generational transitions so that within the span of a few decades, society altogether alters. FASTEST GROWING COUNTY IN THE OECD 1.8% FASTEST GROWING AREAS IN AUSTALIA’S LARGEST STATE ● PARKLEA FASTEST GROWING AREAS IN AUSTALIA’S LARGEST STATE ● PARKLEA ● COBBITTY FASTEST GROWING AREAS IN AUSTALIA’S LARGEST STATE ● PARKLEA ● HOMEBUSH BAY ● COBBITTY FASTEST GROWING AREAS IN AUSTALIA’S LARGEST STATE ● PARKLEA PARRAMATTA ● ● HOMEBUSH BAY ● COBBITTY WESTERN SYDNEY: THE GROWTH DEMOGRAPHIC TODAY 2.1 million | 2.4 million WESTERN SYDNEY: THE GROWTH DEMOGRAPHIC 2032 2.9 million | 2.7 million WITHIN 20 YEARS – LARGER THAN THE EAST SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD SYDNEY & THE CENTRE OF POPULATION ● PARRAMATTA ● SYDNEY CBD THE GREAT WESTERN GROWTH THE GREAT WESTERN
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Proposal-Parklea Markets
    Planning Proposal Parklea Markets, Sunnyholt Road, Glenwood Proposed Amendment to Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1988 Prepared by economiapds planning + development March 2011 PLANNING PROPOSAL economiapds planning + development suite 811, 185 Elizabeth Street sydney nsw 2000 tel: +61 2 9267 5411 fax: +61 2 9267 5422 ABN: 93 105 162 445 Disclaimer: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Almona Pty Ltd. Economia PDS Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Use or copying of this report in whole or in part without the written permission of Economia PDS Pty Ltd is strictly not permitted. economiapds 2 PLANNING PROPOSAL CONTENTS Part 1 Objectives or Intended Outcomes Part 2 Explanation of the Provisions Part 3 Justification Section A – Need for the Planning Proposal Section B – Relationship to Strategic Planning Framework Section C – Environmental, Social & Economic Impact Section D – State and Commonwealth Interests Part 4 Community Consultation LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Aerial View of Site Figure 2: Zoning Map Figure 3: North West T-Way LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Net Community Benefit Test Assessment Table 2: Assessment against Ministerial Directions Appendix A: Economic Impact Assessment Appendix B: Relationship to Strategic Planning Framework economiapds 3 PLANNING PROPOSAL PART 1 OBJECTIVES OR INTENDED OUTCOMES Parklea Markets, on the corner of Sunnyholt and Old Windsor Roads, Parklea is a building of around 20,000sqm that is used for weekend markets. It has around 800 plus stalls which sell a large range of commodities such as, but not limited to, clothing, cosmetics, bulky goods, hardware, auto accessories, electrical items, landscape supplies fresh food and fast food.
    [Show full text]
  • Parklea Expansion Gets Underway
    R www.geogroup.com.au ISSUE 41 : APRIL 2017 Junee wins education award 2 Parklea expansion New manager at Fulham 3 Focus on cultural identity through art 4 Graduation marks first step in recruitment drive 5 gets underway Junee chaplain receives national honour 6 An artist’s impression of the 500-bed maximum-security facility to be constructed within Parklea Correctional Centre. Construction of a 500-bed maximum-security An initial expansion of the centre is already to house an additional 480 maximum-security facility within the grounds of Parklea Correctional underway and will provide beds for an additional prisoners. This will increase the prison’s Centre has begun following the appointment of 150 inmates as well as an extra visitor car park. population to 1355. a building contractor. This first stage of the expansion will be completed The works will include refurbishments and The additional beds will help meet the late this year, while the 500-bed facility is due extensions to several areas including the demands of the rising prison population in New for completion in 2019. The two expansions will health centre, reception, administration, stores, South Wales. take Parklea’s total capacity to 1675. kitchens, laundry and industries building. The SHINE for Kids facility will also be expanded. The project will create up to 250 jobs during Corrective Services NSW commissioner Peter construction and 160 new jobs when the facility Severin said the Parklea site was selected for Over 250 jobs will be created during the is operational. expansion because it is in Sydney where most construction stage and about 130 positions inmates’ families live.
    [Show full text]
  • Parklea Correctional Centre and Other Operational Issues
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Portfolio Committee No. 4 - Legal Affairs Parklea Correctional Centre and other operational issues Ordered to be printed 21 December 2018 according to Standing Order 231 Report 38 - December 2018 i LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Parklea Correctional Centre and other operational issues New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs. Parklea Correctional Centre and other operational issues / Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2018. [ ] pages ; 30 cm. (Report no. 38 / Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs ) “December 2018” Chair: Hon. Robert Borsak, MLC. ISBN 9781922258908 1. Parklea Correctional Centre—Officials and employees 2. Prison contraband—New South Wales. 3. Correctional personnel—New South Wales. 4. Corrections—New South Wales 5. Prison administration—New South Wales 6. Prison industries—New South Wales I. Borsak, Robert. II. Title. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs. Report ; no. 38 365.068 (DDC22) ii Report 38 - December 2018 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE NO. 4 - LEGAL AFFAIRS Table of contents Terms of reference vii Committee details viii Chair’s foreword ix Findings x Recommendations xi Conduct of the inquiry xiii Chapter 1 Background 1 The inquiry 1 Parklea Correctional Centre 1 The current operator, The GEO Group Australia 2 The new operator, MTC/Broadspectrum 2 Features 2 Context 4 The increased
    [Show full text]
  • Common Ground: the Costs and Provision of Community
    Common Ground The Costs and Provision of Community Infrastructure in Community Title Schemes in NSW A study by the City Futures Research Centre at the University of New South Wales on behalf of the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW The Cost and Provision of Community Infrastructure in Community Title Schemes in NSW A study by the City Futures Research Centre at the University of New South WalesAPRIL on behalf 2008 of UDIA NSW This study was undertaken by the City Futures Research Centre at the University of New South Wales on behalf of the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW (UDIA NSW). The views expressed by the respondents do not necessarily reflect the views of UDIA NSW. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all those who participated in the research and who freely provided their time and information on which the report is largely based: Leichhardt Council Canada Bay Council Blacktown Council Lake Macquarie Council Penrith City Council Dynamic Property Services Strata Master Southland Pacific Asset Management Stockland ANKA Landcom/Mirvac Liberty Grove Community Association Balmain Cove Community Association The authors also wish to thank the NSW Department of Lands, who provided data on the number and location of community title schemes in NSW. Pro bono legal advice was received from Holding Redlich Lawyers and Andreones Lawyers. Support and advice was also received from the UDIA NSW Strata and Community Development Committee. The authors would in particular wish to acknowledge the technical advice and guidance provided by Mr. Scott Woodcock, Chief Executive Officer of UDIA NSW and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydney Growth Infrastructure Compact Program Land Use Scenario Forecasts
    WESTERN SYDNEY GROWTH INFRASTRUCTURE COMPACT PROGRAM LAND USE SCENARIO FORECASTS SUMMARY REPORT Prepared for MARCH 2020 Greater Sydney Commission © SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd 2020 This report has been prepared for the Greater Sydney Commission. SGS Economics and Planning has taken all due care in the preparation of this report. However, SGS and its associated consultants are not liable to any person or entity for any damage or loss that has occurred, or may occur, in relation to that person or entity taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd ACN 007 437 729 www.sgsep.com.au Offices in Canberra, Hobart, Melbourne, Sydney TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Summary of land use scenario results 4 1. INTRODUCTION 13 1.1 Background 13 1.2 Project overview 13 2. SCENARIO NARRATIVES 18 2.1 Scenario overview 18 2.2 Base Case Land Use (~Scenario 1) 19 2.3 GIC Land Use Option 1 (~Scenario 2) 20 2.4 GIC Land Use Option 2 (~Scenario 3) 21 3. SCENARIO RESULTS 22 3.1 Greater Sydney distribution 22 3.2 Western Sydney Planning Partnership LGAs 27 3.3 GIC #1 Overview 40 3.4 GIC #2 Overview 48 3.5 Age/Sex Profile 55 4. DEVELOPMENT METHOD 57 4.1 TZP modelling approach and concepts 57 4.2 Scenario development method 58 4.3 Dataset scope and variables 62 4.4 Key assumptions and inputs 68 4.5 Limitation of data and approach 74 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health of Australia's Prisoners 2009
    The health of Australia’s prisoners 2009 The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare is Australia’s national health and welfare statistics and information agency. The Institute’s mission is better information and statistics for better health and wellbeing. © Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under theCopyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Head, Media and Communications Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, GPO Box 570, Canberra ACT 2601. A complete list of the Institute’s publications is available from the Institute’s website <www.aihw.gov.au>. ISBN 978-1-74249-011-3 Suggested citation Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2010. The health of Australia’s prisoners 2009. Cat. no. PHE 123. Canberra: AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Board Chair Hon. Peter Collins, AM, QC Director Penny Allbon Any enquiries about or comments on this publication should be directed to: Ingrid Johnston Australian Institute of Health and Welfare GPO Box 570 Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (02) 6244 1211 Email: [email protected] Published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Design and typesetting by Sam Highley Printed by Union Offset Printers Cover art by an Indigenous offender Please note that there is the potential for minor revisions of data in this report. Please check the online version at <www.aihw.gov.au> for any amendments. Foreword Foreword An estimated 50,000 people are released from prison each year in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Histories
    SYDNEY PRIVATE BUS ROUTES Brief histories from 1925 to the present of private bus services in the metropolitan area of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Route Histories - Contract Region 1 (Outer west between Blacktown, Penrith, Windsor & Richmond) Routes 661-664, 668, 669, 671-680, 682, 683, 685, 686, 688-693, 718, 720-730, 735, 737-763, 766-776, 778-799, N1-6, S7, S11-13, T70-72, T74, T75 & Move Zones (and 675A, 675C, 725W, 739V, 741R, 741S, 742R, 742S, 742T, 753W, 756G, 768i, 782E) in the Sydney Region Route Number System Includes routes in the same area prior to the creation of the contract regions in 2004. A work in progress. Corrections and comments welcome – [email protected] Sunday services normally apply to Public Holidays as well. “T-way” means Transitway. denotes this route or this version of the route no longer operative. Overview Suburbs in contract region (Suburbs with railway stations in bold) Agnes Banks Cranebrook Kings Park Oakville South Windsor Arndell Park Dean Park Kingswood Orchard Hills St Clair Berambing Dharruk Kurmond Oxley Park St Marys Berkshire Park Doonside Kurrajong Parklea Stanhope Bidwill East Richmond Kurrajong Penrith Gardens Bilpin Eastern Creek Heights Pitt Town The Ponds Blackett Ebenezer Lalor Park Plumpton Tregear Blacktown Emerton Lethbridge Park Prospect Vineyard Bligh Park Erskine Park Llandilo Quakers Hill Wallacia Bowen Freemans Reach Londonderry Quarry Hills Warragamba Mountain Glendenning Luddenham Regentville Werrington Box Hill Glenmore Park Maraylya Richmond Werrington Bungarribee
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Inquiry Into Parklea Correctional Centre and Other Operational Issues Rapid Build Dormitory Prisons
    Submission to the Inquiry into Parklea Correctional Centre and other operational issues Rapid Build Dormitory Prisons Dr Carolyn McKay Lecturer in Law University of Sydney Law School [email protected] February 2018 To the Members of the Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs The focus of this submission is on the expansion of the penal estate in New South Wales (NSW) by the construction of Rapid Build Prisons with dormitory accommodation. This submission responds to the extended terms of references, specifically: The Chair of the Committee, the Hon Robert Borsak MLC said, “Concerns have been raised to the committee about plans to accommodate prisoners in dormitory style accommodation. In particular, there are significant concerns about the privacy and safety of prisoners and the impact of such conditions on prisoner health and recidivism.” (Legislative Council 2017) The thrust of this submission is that extant literature does not support the use of dormitory accommodation as a means to provide safe, secure, sanitary and rehabilitative environments for prisoners. Background The Australian prison population stands at approximately 41,262 (ABS 2017). NSW contributes the largest proportion of prisoners to this figure with 12,989 persons incarcerated as at December 2017 (BOCSAR 2018), representing roughly 32 per cent of the national population (ABS 2017). Until recently, NSW’s prison population has continued to hit new highs, but a large number of prisoners being released on parole has resulted in a slight decline in the current prison population (BOCSAR 2018). In order to address the rising prison population and ensuing prison overcrowding (Paget 2015; Audit Office of NSW 2016; Productivity Commission 2017), the NSW Government has adopted a strategy of expanding the prison estate via the $3.8 billion Prison Bed Expansion program (Nicholls 2016) that includes the recommissioning of old prisons1, expanding existing facilities and the construction of Rapid Build Prisons with dormitory accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • TEI Priority Groups of Greater Western Sydney
    CENSUS 2016 TOPIC PAPER Targeted Earlier Intervention (TEI) Program Reform: TEI priority groups in Greater Western Sydney By Amy Lawton, Social Research and Information Officer, WESTIR Ltd 2016 © WESTIR Limited A.B.N 65 003 487 965 A.C.N. 003 487 965 This work is Copyright. Apart from use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part can be reproduced by any process without the written permission from the Executive Officer of WESTIR Ltd. All possible care has been taken in the preparation of the information contained in this publication. However, WESTIR Ltd expressly disclaims any liability for the accuracy and sufficiency of the information and under no circumstances shall be liable in negligence or otherwise in or arising out of the preparation or supply of any of the information WESTIR Ltd is partly funded by the NSW Department of Family and Community Services. Suite 7, Level 2 154 Marsden Street [email protected] (02) 9635 7764 Parramatta, NSW 2150 PO Box 136 Parramatta 2124 WESTIR LTD ABN: 65 003 487 965 | ACN: 003 487 965 Targeted Earlier Intervention (TEI) Program Reform: TEI priority groups in Greater Western Sydney, 2016 By Amy Lawton, Social Research and Information Officer, WESTIR Limited Introduction In late 2015, the NSW Department of Family and Community Services (FACS) began the reform process to redesign their early intervention service system for disadvantaged individuals, families and communities in New South Wales (NSW). The reform is collectively known as the Targeted Earlier Intervention (TEI) Program. The aim of the TEI Reform is to create a service system that is flexible, locally responsive, evidence based, adaptive and client-centred.
    [Show full text]