DOCSLIB.ORG

Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites 1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2011. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 11.5 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2010 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. For other arachnid groups we have largely followed the nomenclature and family sequences adopted in other online or printed summaries; for example Victor Fet et al.’s work on scorpions, Mark Harvey’s catalogues of pseudoscorpions and the ‘minor’ orders – all of which also list the fossils – Adriano Kury’s harvestman overviews and the third edition of the Manual of Acarology for mites. For all groups, genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross- referenced against the primary literature. 2 We aim to reflect the latest published opinions on the taxonomy of fossil species. A caveat here is that some synonomies and transfers proposed in the literature were only provisional or tentative in nature. At times we were forced to interpret whether a formal nomenclatural change had actually been made, and we have tried to accomodate these difficulties as best as possible. We should also stress that many historical fossil types require revision. Older species names assigned to common, modern genera such as Araneus, Clubiona or Linyphia among the spiders, should be treated with caution. The list has been extended to include Recent species – particularly some spiders and numerous oribatid mites – found as (sub)fossils. These are generally specimens of Quaternary age found in copal, or recovered from peats or archeological sites. We have provided references for the first descriptions of all the fossil species, and where possible we have added the relevant taxonomic literature for all the taxon names which we mention here. We should, however, note that for some groups (especially mites) recovering the correct author and date for higher taxa proved challenging, and we hope in future releases to be able to clarify these names and augment the reference list accordingly. Formal synonomy lists for the fossil species are being compiled and that which we have for individual taxa can be made available upon request upon a ‘fair use’ basis. As with any project of this size, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of all these entries and we encourage readers to foward omissions or corrections to <[email protected]> or <[email protected]>. PRINCIPAL CHANGES SINCE THE LAST UPDATE A handful of new fossil arachnids and their relatives have been described since the last version, including some eurypterids, an opilioacarid mite, a trigonotarbid, a theridosomatid spider and some schizomids. There have also been some changes to the family structure of the Euryperida and Trigonotarbida. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are, as ever, especially grateful to Norman Platnick for agreeing to host this list as an appendix to the Catalog, to Paul Selden for encouragement and support and to those colleagues who have advised us on oversights and/or provided further literature. 3 EXPLANATIONS • † indicates an entirely extinct genus, family or other higher taxon • all species listed assumed to be extinct unless marked [Recent] • * indicates the type species of (fossil) genera Stratigraphical abbreviations: pЄ = Precambrian, Є = Cambrian, O = Ordovician, S = Silurian, D = Devonian, C = Carboniferous, P = Permian Tr = Triassic, J = Jurassic, K = Cretaceous Pa = Palaeogene, Ne = Neogene, Qt = Quaternary 4 PYCNOGONIDA 9 currently valid species of fossil sea spider • note that in some modern phylogenies the Palaeozoic genera resolve within the crown group PYCNOGONIDA Latreille, 1810 …………...............……………………………. Cambrian – Recent † Cambropycnogon Waloszek & Dunlop, 2002 ………………………………….………… Cambrian 1. Cambropycnogon klausmuelleri Waloszek & Dunlop, 2002* ……….…….. Є ‘Orsten’, Sweden Pycnogonid affinities questioned by Bamber (2007) † Haliestes Siveter, Sutton, Briggs & Siveter, 2004 ……………………………………… Silurian 2. Haliestes dasos Siveter, Sutton, Briggs & Siveter, 2004* …………………. S Herefordshire Lgst. † Flagellopantopus Poschmann & Dunlop, 2006 …………………………………………. Devonian 3. Flagellopantopus blocki Poschmann & Dunlop, 2006* …………………….. D Hünsruckschiefer † PALAEOISOPODIDAE Dubinin, 1957 ……………………………………………………... Devonian † Palaeoisopus Broili, 1928 …………………………………………………….……………… Devonian 4. Palaeoisopus problematicus Broili, 1928* …………………………………….. D Hünsruckschiefer † PALAEOPANTOPODIDAE Broili, 1930 …………………………………….……………… Devonian † Palaeopantopus Broili, 1928 ………………………………………………….…………….. Devonian 5. Palaeopantopus maucheri Broili, 1928* ……………………………………….. D Hünsruckschiefer PANTOPODA Gerstaecker, 1863 …...................………………………………. Devonian – Recent = PEGMATA Fry, 1978 family uncertain † Palaeothea Bergström, Stürmer & Winter, 1980 ………………………………………... Devonian 6. Palaeothea devonica Bergström, Stürmer & Winter, 1980* ………………. D Hünsruckschiefer AUSTRODECIDAE Stock, 1954 ………………………………….………………………….... Recent no fossil record PYCNOGONIDAE Wilson, 1878 ………………………………………………….………….... Recent no fossil record COLOSSENDEIDAE Hoek, 1881 …………………………………………………………….... ?Jurassic – Recent = PASITHOIDAE Sars, 1891 = RHOPALORHYNCHIDAE Fry, 1978 † Colossopantopodus Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007 …………..…………..……... Jurassic 5 7. Colossopantopodus boissinensis Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007* . J La Voulte-sur-Rhône tentative referal AMMOTHEIDAE Dohrn, 1881 ………………………………………………….…………….... ?Jurassic – Recent = EURYCIDIDAE Sars, 1891 = OORHYNCHIDAE Schimkewitsch, 1913 = TANYSTYLIDAE Schimkewitsch, 1913 = AMMOTHELLIDAE Fry, 1978 = EPHYROGYMNIDAE Fry, 1978 = PARANYMPHONIDAE Fry, 1978 = SERICOSURIDAE Fry, 1978 = TRYGAEIDAE Fry, 1978 † Palaeopycnogonides Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007 …………..………………... Jurassic 8. Palaeopycnogonides gracilis Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007* ….…. J La Voulte-sur-Rhône tentative referal CALLIPALLENIDAE Hilton, 1942 ………………………………..………………………….... Recent = PALLENIDAE Wilson, 1878 [Pallene is a preoccupied genus] = CHEILAPALLENIDAE Fry, 1978 = CLAVIGEROPALLENIDAE Fry, 1978 = HANNONIDAE Fry, 1978 = METAPALLENIDAE Fry, 1978 = QUEUBIDAE Fry, 1978 = STYLOPALLENIDAE Fry, 1978 no fossil record NYMPHONIDAE Wilson, 1878 ……………………………………………………………….... Recent no fossil record PALLENOPSIDAE Fry, 1978 …………………………………..…………………………….... Recent no fossil record ENDEIDAE Norman, 1904 ………………………………………...………………………….... ?Jurassic – Recent † Palaeoendeis Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007 ………………………………….…... Jurassic 9. Palaeoendeis elmii Charbonnier, Vannier & Riou, 2007* ……….……….... J La Voulte-sur-Rhône tentative referal PHOXICHILIDIIDAE Sars, 1891 ……………………………….…………………….……….... Recent = ANOPLODACTYLIDAE Fry, 1978 = PHOXIPHILYRIDAE Fry, 1978 no fossil record RHYNCHOTHORACIDAE Thompson, 1909 ……………………………………………….... Recent no fossil record MISIDENTIFICATIONS 6 1. Palpipes cursor Roth, 1854 [crustacean] …………..................................…....…. J Solnhofen 2. Pentapalaeopycnon inconspicua Hedgpeth, 1978 [crustacean] ……………...…. J Solnhofen 3. Phalangites multipes Münster, 1851 [crustacean] …………....................…….…. J Solnhofen 4. Phalangites priscus Münster, 1839 [crustacean] …………..............................…. J Solnhofen 5. Pycnogonites uncinatus Quenstedt, 1852 [crustacean] …………............…....…. J Solnhofen c. 1300 Recent species 7 EUCHELICERATA 5 currently valid, but unplaced euchelicerate fossil species • Offacolus has been described in detail from reconstructions based on serial sections, and was resolved in some phylogenies to a basal position within Euchelicerata • the other listed taxa are mostly poor or incomplete specimens which have been treated as either xiphosurans, chasmataspids or eurypterids • resting impressions imply that Chasmataspidida were probably present in the late Cambrian EUCHELICERATA Weygoldt & Paulus, 1979 …………...….….………… ?Cambrian – Recent EUCHELICERATA INCERTAE SEDIS † Borchgrevinkium Novojilov, 1959 …………...….…........................................…….…… Devonian 1. Borchgrevinkium taimyrensis Novojilov, 1959* ……...........................…….. D Taimyr, Siberia † Melbournopterus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Canopy Arthropods of Old and Mature Pine Pinus Sylvestris in Norway
    ECOGRAPHY 26: 490–502, 2003 The canopy arthropods of old and mature pine Pinus syl7estris in Norway Karl H. Thunes, John Skarveit and Ivar Gjerde Thunes, K. H., Skarveit, J. and Gjerde, I. 2003. The canopy arthropods of old and mature pine Pinus syl6estris in Norway. – Ecography 26: 490–502. We fogged 24 trees in two pine dominated forests in Norway with a synthetic pyrethroid in order to compare the canopy-dwelling fauna of arthropods between costal (Kvam) and boreal (Sigdal) sites and between old (250–330 yr) and mature (60–120 yr) trees at Sigdal. Almost 30 000 specimens were assigned to 510 species; only 93 species were present at both sites. Species diversity, as established by rarefaction, was similar in old and mature trees. However, the number of species new to Norway (including nine species new to science) was significantly higher in the old trees. We suggest that the scarcity of old trees, habitat heterogeneity and structural differences between old and mature trees may explain these patterns. Productivity and topographic position at the site of growth explained the between-tree variation in species occurrence for the more abundant species, which were mainly Collembola and Oribatida. Species diversity was similar at the boreal and coastal sites, but there were clear differences in species composition. K. H. Thunes ([email protected]) and I. Gjerde, Norwegian Forest Research Inst., Fanaflaten 4, N-5244 Fana, Norway.–J. Skart6eit, Museum of Zoology, Uni6. of Bergen, Muse´plass 3, N-5007 Bergen, Norway, (present address: Dept of Ecology and Conser6ation, Scottish Agricultural College, Ayr Campus, Auchincrui6e Estate, Ayr, Scotland KA65HW.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanislav Knor Školitel
    UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE PŘÍRODOV ĚDECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE Interakce rostlin a hmyzu ve fosilním záznamu Bakalá řská práce Stanislav Knor Školitel: RNDr. Jakub Prokop, Ph.D. Praha 2008 Tímto prohlašuji, že jsem uvedenou práci vypracoval samostatn ě, s využitím uvedené citované literatury. V Praze dne 12. srpna 2008 Stanislav Knor 1 Abstrakt V sou časné dob ě je rozmanitost života na Zemi dána p ředevším druhovým bohatstvím hmyzu, cévnatých rostlin a jejich vzájemnými vztahy. Jejich po čátek spadá do doby p řed více než 400 milión ů let, kdy vznikly první suchozemské ekosystémy. Fosilní nálezy umož ňují geochronologické a taxonomické za řazení jednotlivých druh ů a jejich vývojových stádií. Přestože n ěkteré fosilní doklady jsou vzácné, existuje jich dostate čné množství k utvo ření relevantních záv ěrů. Studované fosilní nálezy související s koevolucí rostlin a hmyzu je možné roz členit následujícím zp ůsobem: poškození rostlinných tkání, koprolity, obsah trávící trubice, typy ústního ústrojí hmyzu a rozmnožovací orgány rostlin. Z t ěchto skupin pak mají pravd ěpodobn ě nejv ětší význam stopy poškození rostlinných tkání spole čně s morfologií hmyzího ústního ústrojí vytvá řející spojené funk čně potravní skupiny. Cílem bakalá řské práce je p ředstavení jednotlivých vývojových etap hmyzího ústního ústrojí, demonstrace n ěkterých p říklad ů herbivorních asociací hmyzu a rostlin, a to se zřetelem k jejich fylogenetickému postavení a stratigrafickému kontextu. Klí čová slova: Hmyz, cévnaté rostliny, fosilní asociace, herbivorie, typy ústní ústrojí, mina, hálka, poškození rostlin, koprolity, obsah trávící trubice Abstract Life biodiversity on the Earth is mainly represented by enormous richness of the vascular plants and insect species and their associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Ploughing and Pesticide Application on Oribatid Mite Communities
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330957388 Effect of ploughing and pesticide application on oribatid mite communities Article in International Journal of Acarology · February 2019 DOI: 10.1080/01647954.2019.1572222 CITATIONS READS 0 73 5 authors, including: Maka Murvanidze Levan Mumladze Agricultural University of Georgia Ilia State University 56 PUBLICATIONS 231 CITATIONS 68 PUBLICATIONS 350 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Nino Todria Mark Maraun Agricultural University of Georgia Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 306 PUBLICATIONS 5,132 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Algal feeding of salt marsh oribatid mites in the Wadden Sea of Spiekeroog (Germany) – evidence from molecular gut-content analyses View project Litter Links View project All content following this page was uploaded by Maka Murvanidze on 08 February 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. International Journal of Acarology ISSN: 0164-7954 (Print) 1945-3892 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/taca20 Effect of ploughing and pesticide application on oribatid mite communities Maka Murvanidze, Levan Mumladze, Nino Todria, Meri Salakaia & Mark Maraun To cite this article: Maka Murvanidze, Levan Mumladze, Nino Todria, Meri Salakaia & Mark Maraun (2019): Effect of ploughing and pesticide application on oribatid mite communities, International
    [Show full text]
  • Deformation to Users
    DEFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. IDgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell InArmadon Compai^ 300 Noith Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Conservation of Biodiversity: Guilds, Microhabitat Use and Dispersal of Canopy Arthropods in the Ancient Sitka Spruce Forests of the Carmanah Valley, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. by Neville N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia
    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 141–149, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.141 The armoured mite fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a long-term study in the Scots pine forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia 1 2 1 Uģis KAGAINIS , Voldemārs SPUNĢIS and Viesturs MELECIS 1 Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, 3 Miera Street, LV-2169, Salaspils, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology,University of Latvia, 4 Kronvalda Blvd., LV-1586, Riga, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In 1992–2012, a considerable amount of soil micro-arthropods has been collected annually as a part of a project of the National Long-Term Ecological Research Network of Latvia at the Mazsalaca Scots Pine forest sites of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve. Until now, the data on oribatid species have not been published. This paper presents a list of oribatid species collected during 21 years of ongoing research in three pine stands of different age. The faunistic records refer to 84 species (including 17 species new to the fauna of Latvia), 1 subspecies, 1 form, 5 morphospecies and 18 unidentified taxa. The most dominant and most frequent oribatid species are Oppiella (Oppiella) nova, Tectocepheus velatus velatus and Suctobelbella falcata. Key words: species list, fauna, stand-age, LTER, Mazsalaca INTRODUCTION Most studies of Oribatida or the so-called armoured mites (Subías 2004) have been relatively short term and/or from different ecosystems simultaneously and do not show long- term changes (Winter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint a REPORT on CAVE SPIDERS FROM
    !"#$%&'(()*+,%-%.)/0+,* A REPORT ON CAVE SPIDERS FROM MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA 1 Willis J. Gertsch2 Curator Emeritus, American Museum of Natural History, New York About one hundred species of spiders have so far can caves. been reported from cave habitats in Mexico and in- The obligate cavernicoles are always of special tensive collecting surveys will eventually enlarge this interest because of deep commitment to cave exist- list several times. In an earlier paper Gertsch (1971) ence. Six additional species from Mexico and Central cited 86 species, most of them new, and the present America enlarge this total to 19 from the 13 Mexican report further enlarges the Mexican fauna by addition taxa noted in the earlier paper. Two additional fami- of 20 species of which 16 are herein described for the lies, Telemidae and Ochyroceratidae, are now repre- first time. In addition, eight new species are reported sented as listed below. from caves in Guatemala, Belize (British Honduras), Family Dipluridae and Panama of Central America, the larger area con- Euagrus anops, new species sidered in this paper. Additional records with full Cueva de la Porra, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico. collecting data are presented for some species noted Family Theraphosidae on earlier lists, and I look forward to future considera- Schizopelma reddelli, new species tion of spider families not mentioned here. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio, Spiders are important predators of crawling and Oaxaca, Mexico. flying invertebrates and penetrate into all parts of Family Pholcidae caves where prey is present. The regional cave fauna is Metagonia martha, new species derived from local taxa and comprises distinctive ele- Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio, ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska
    Zootaxa 4666 (1): 001–180 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4666.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA01E30E-7F64-49AB-910A-7EE6E597A4A4 ZOOTAXA 4666 Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER1,3 & ZOË LINDO1 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A0C6, Canada. 2Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Pfingstl: 26 Jul. 2019; published: 6 Sept. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER & ZOË LINDO Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska (Zootaxa 4666) 180 pp.; 30 cm. 6 Sept. 2019 ISBN 978-1-77670-761-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-762-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2019 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press BEHAN-PELLETIER & LINDO Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Oribatida No
    13 (2) · 2013 Franke, K. Oribatida No. 44 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 – 24 Acarological literature .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2013 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2012 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Publications, additions 2011 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Publications, additions 2010 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Publications, additions 2009 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Publications, additions 2008 ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW SPECIES of the FAMILY ALYCIDAE (ACARI, ENDEOSTIGMATA) from SOUTHERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA Matti Uusitalo
    Acarina 28 (2): 109–113 © Acarina 2020 A NEW SPECIES OF THE FAMILY ALYCIDAE (ACARI, ENDEOSTIGMATA) FROM SOUTHERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA Matti Uusitalo Zoological Museum, Center for Biodiversity, University of Turku, Turku, Finland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A new species is described from southern Siberia, Tuva Republic, Russia: Amphialycus (Amphialycus) holarcticus sp. n. (Acari, Endeostigmata, Alycidae). This species can be recognized by its broad naso with longitudinally arranged striae; two pairs of cheliceral setae, posterior one being forked; three pairs of adoral setae; and a large number of genital setae. Two pairs of palpal eupathidia are close to each other, representing a kind of transitional form towards the fusion of the basal parts of eupathidia, observed in the subgenus Orthacarus. KEY WORDS: Mites, Amphialycus, taxonomy, Asia. DOI: 10.21684/0132-8077-2020-28-2-109-113 INTRODUCTION Mites of the family Alycidae G. Canestrini and chaelia Uusitalo, 2010 and should be re-examined. Fanzago, 1877 (Acari, Endeostigmata) are free- For example, Bimichaelia ramosus was redescribed living soil-dwellers, characterized by a worldwide and renamed as Laminamichaelia shibai Uusitalo distribution. A recent revision of the family by et al., 2020 in a recent review of the South African Uusitalo (2010) has focused on the European spe- Alycidae (Uusitalo et al. 2020). cies. Meanwhile, species from other regions are Furthermore, Bimichaelia grandis was de- virtually unknown. For example, alycids were not scribed by Berlese (1913) from the island of Java, included in a recent thorough checklist of the mites Indonesia; this species will be redescribed based of Pakistan (Halliday et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Oribatid Mites in Biodegradation and Mineralization for Enhancing Plant Productivity
    Acarological Studies Vol 1 (2): 101-122 RESEARCH ARTICLE Potential of oribatid mites in biodegradation and mineralization for enhancing plant productivity Mohamed Abdul HAQ Division of Acarology, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Kerala, 673 635, India e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 December 2018 Accepted: 8 May 2019 Available online: 31 July 2019 ABSTRACT: The degradation of litter is an essential process of the soil ecosystem leading to nutrient cycling and is mediated by a heterogeneous group of soil organisms. Oribatid mites represent one of the predominant agents of litter biodegradation in the soil. The ubiquitous presence and extensive diversity of this group of mites make them integral to the process of mineralization of litter in almost all types of soil ecosystems. However, an overall assessment of the mineralization potential of different groups of oribatid mites depicts the relative advantage of lower groups of oribatids, namely the lohmannoid and phthiracaroid members, in the degradation of leafy and woody elements of litter. Degradation of such complex materials primarily necessitates additional qualities such as strong and well developed oral and holding appendages, and the presence of the necessary enteric microflora and associated enzymes, for on-going degradation. In-depth field and laboratory studies of two representative species of the above two groups of mites, viz. Atropacarus (Hoplophorella) chaliyamensis Haq and Xavier, 2005 and Heptacarus hirsutus Wallwork, 1964, with the vegetable crop Vigna unguiculata, clearly demonstrated that these species make a remarkable contribution to the process of nutrient cycling. The combined feeding activity of these two species on the woody elements of litter was found to enhance the release of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium, as evidenced by the increased concentration of these minerals in fecal pellets.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Mite New Species Discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015)
    Zootaxa 4208 (2): 101–126 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4208.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47690FBF-B745-4A65-8887-AADFF1189719 Hotspots of mite new species discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015) GUANG-YUN LI1 & ZHI-QIANG ZHANG1,2 1 School of Biological Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, New Zealand; corresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract A list of of type localities and depositories of new species of the mite order Sarciptiformes published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology) during 2013–2015 is presented in this paper, and trends and patterns of new species are summarised. The 242 new species are distributed unevenly among 50 families, with 62% of the total from the top 10 families. Geographically, these species are distributed unevenly among 39 countries. Most new species (72%) are from the top 10 countries, whereas 61% of the countries have only 1–3 new species each. Four of the top 10 countries are from Asia (Vietnam, China, India and The Philippines). Key words: Acari, Sarcoptiformes, new species, distribution, type locality, type depository Introduction This paper provides a list of the type localities and depositories of new species of the order Sarciptiformes (Acari: Acariformes) published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology (SAA)) during 2013–2015 and a summary of trends and patterns of these new species. It is a continuation of a previous paper (Liu et al.
    [Show full text]