DOCSLIB.ORG

Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska Zootaxa 4666 (1): 001–180 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4666.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA01E30E-7F64-49AB-910A-7EE6E597A4A4 ZOOTAXA 4666 Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER1,3 & ZOË LINDO1 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A0C6, Canada. 2Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Pfingstl: 26 Jul. 2019; published: 6 Sept. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER & ZOË LINDO Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska (Zootaxa 4666) 180 pp.; 30 cm. 6 Sept. 2019 ISBN 978-1-77670-761-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-762-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2019 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press BEHAN-PELLETIER & LINDO Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................5 Historical Overview of Research on Oribatida in Canada and Alaska ...................................................5 Materials and methods .......................................................................................7 Infraorder Palaeosomata ....................................................................................12 Family Acaronychidae ......................................................................................12 Family Archeonothridae .....................................................................................12 Family Palaeacaridae .......................................................................................12 Family Aphelacaridae ......................................................................................12 Family Ctenacaridae .......................................................................................12 Infraorder Enarthronota .....................................................................................13 Family Brachychthoniidae ...................................................................................13 Family Atopochthoniidae ....................................................................................20 Family Pterochthoniidae ....................................................................................20 Family Eniochthoniidae .....................................................................................20 Family Hypochthoniidae ....................................................................................21 Family Mesoplophoridae ....................................................................................22 Family Cosmochthoniidae ...................................................................................22 Family Haplochthoniidae ....................................................................................23 Family Sphaerochthoniidae ..................................................................................23 Family Arborichthoniidae ...................................................................................23 Family Trichthoniidae ......................................................................................23 Infraorder Parhyposomata ...................................................................................23 Family Gehypochthoniidae ..................................................................................24 Family Parhypochthoniidae ..................................................................................24 Infraorder Mixonomata .....................................................................................24 Family Eulohmanniidae .....................................................................................24 Family Perlohmanniidae ....................................................................................25 Family Epilohmanniidae ....................................................................................25 Family Euphthiracaridae ....................................................................................26 Family Oribotritiidae .......................................................................................30 Family Synichotritiidae .....................................................................................32 Family Phthiracaridae ......................................................................................33 Infraorder Desmonomata ....................................................................................39 Hyporder Nothrina .........................................................................................39 Family Crotoniidae ........................................................................................39 Family Hermanniidae .......................................................................................44 Family Malaconothridae ....................................................................................45 Family Nanhermanniidae ....................................................................................47 Family Nothridae ..........................................................................................48 Family Trhypochthoniidae ...................................................................................50 Hyporder Brachypylina .....................................................................................52 Family Hermanniellidae .....................................................................................52 Family Plasmobatidae ......................................................................................53 Family Neoliodidae ........................................................................................53 Family Gymnodamaeidae ...................................................................................53 Family Licnodamaeidae .....................................................................................56 Family Plateremaeidae ......................................................................................56 Family Damaeidae .........................................................................................56 Family Cepheidae .........................................................................................62 Family Nodocepheidae .....................................................................................64 Family Podopterotegaeidae ..................................................................................64 Family Polypterozetidae ....................................................................................65 Family Microzetidae .......................................................................................65 Family Ameridae ..........................................................................................65 Family Caleremaeidae ......................................................................................65 Family Damaeolidae .......................................................................................66 Family Eremobelbidae ......................................................................................66 Family Eremulidae .........................................................................................66 Family Hungarobelbidae ....................................................................................66 Family Eremaeidae ........................................................................................67 Family Megeremaeidae .....................................................................................72 CHECKLIST OF ORIBATID MITES OF CANADA AND ALASKA Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 3 Family Astegistidae ........................................................................................73 Family Gustaviidae ........................................................................................74 Family Kodiakellidae .......................................................................................74 Family Liacaridae .........................................................................................75 Family Peloppiidae ........................................................................................77 Family Tenuialidae .........................................................................................81 Family Carabodidae ........................................................................................82 Family Autognetidae .......................................................................................85 Family Machuellidae .......................................................................................86 Family Oppiidae ...........................................................................................86 Family Quadroppiidae ......................................................................................93 Family Thyrisomidae .......................................................................................94
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on Oribatid Mites: Prey Preferences and Hunting Behaviour
    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(2): 339–353, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/2/339 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Specialized feeding of Euconnus pubicollis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on oribatid mites: Prey preferences and hunting behaviour 1 2 PAWEŁ JAŁOSZYŃSKI and ZIEMOWIT OLSZANOWSKI 1 Museum of Natural History, Wrocław University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae, Cyrtoscydmini, Euconnus, Palaearctic, prey preferences, feeding behaviour, Acari, Oribatida Abstract. Prey preferences and feeding-related behaviour of a Central European species of Scydmaeninae, Euconnus pubicollis, were studied under laboratory conditions. Results of prey choice experiments involving 50 species of mites belonging to 24 families of Oribatida and one family of Uropodina demonstrated that beetles feed mostly on ptyctimous Phthiracaridae (over 90% of prey) and only occasionally on Achipteriidae, Chamobatidae, Steganacaridae, Oribatellidae, Ceratozetidae, Euphthiracaridae and Galumni- dae. The average number of mites consumed per beetle per day was 0.27 ± 0.07, and the entire feeding process took 2.15–33.7 h and showed a clear linear relationship with prey body length. Observations revealed a previously unknown mechanism for capturing prey in Scydmaeninae in which a droplet of liquid that exudes from the mouth onto the dorsal surface of the predator’s mouthparts adheres to the mite’s cuticle. Morphological adaptations associated with this strategy include the flattened distal parts of the maxillae, whereas the mandibles play a minor role in capturing prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Oribátidos (Acari, Oribatida) De La Ribera Del Río Guadalquivir (Sur De España)
    Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, nº 21 (31/12/2012): 33‒37. ARTÍCULO Grupo Ibérico de Aracnología (S.E.A.). ISSN: 1576 - 9518. http://www.sea-entomologia.org/ ORIBÁTIDOS (ACARI, ORIBATIDA) DE LA RIBERA DEL RÍO GUADALQUIVIR (SUR DE ESPAÑA). DESCRIPCIÓN DE BULLIBATES HYGROPHILUS N. GEN., N. SP. (HERMANNIELLIDAE) Luis S. Subías¹ & Umukusum Ya. Shtanchaeva² ¹ Departamento de Zoología. Facultad de Biología. Universidad Complutense. 28040 Madrid. España ‒ [email protected] ² Instituto de Recursos Biológicos del Caspio de Daguestán. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia. Mahachkala 376000. Rusia ‒ [email protected] Resumen: Se estudian los ácaros oribátidos procedentes de un muestreo de suelos de las riberas del río Guadalquivir en la pro- vincia de Córdoba (Andalucía, sur de España), de donde se han identificado 86 especies. Se describe un nuevo género y especie, Bullibates hygrophilus n. gen., n. sp., de la familia Hermanniellidae y se citan por primera vez 27 especies para la fauna andaluza. Palabras clave: Acari, Oribatida, género nuevo, especie nueva, primeras citas, España, Andalucía, río Guadalquivir. Oribatids (Acari, Oribatida) from the Guadalquivir valley (southern Spain). Description of Bullibates hygrophilus n. gen., n. sp. (Hermanniellidae) Abstract: Oribatid mites from soil samples taken in the riverside of the Guadalquivir valley in Córdoba province (Andalusia, south- ern Spain) are studied. A total of 86 species were identified. A new genus and species of the family Hermanniellidae, Bullibates hy- grophilus n. gen., n. sp., are described. 27 species are also recorded for the first time from Andalusia. Key words: Acari, Oribatida, new genus, new species, first records, Spain, Andalusia, Guadalquivir river. Taxonomía /Taxonomy: Bullibates n.
    [Show full text]
  • Trampling, Litter Removal, and Variations in the Composition And
    Zoological Studies 48(2): 162-173 (2009) Trampling, Litter Removal, and Variations in the Composition and Relative Abundance of Soil Arthropods in a Subtropical Hardwood Forest Ya-Fu Lee1,2, Yen-Min Kuo1,2, Sheng-Shan Lu2, Duen-Yuh Chen1, Hao-Jiang Jean1, and Jung-Tai Chao2,* 1Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan 2Division of Forest Protection, Taiwan Forest Research Institute, Taipei 100, Taiwan (Accepted July 8, 2008) Ya-Fu Lee, Yen-Min Kuo, Sheng-Shan Lu, Duen-Yuh Chen, Hao-Jiang Jean, and Jung-Tai Chao (2009) Trampling, litter removal, and variations in the composition and relative abundance of soil arthropods in a subtropical hardwood forest. Zoological Studies 48(2): 162-173. Relationships of human trampling and litter removal with physicochemical properties and arthropod diversity of forest soils were studied in a secondary hardwood forest in northern Taiwan. In 4 sampling sessions, 360 soil cores were extracted from 24 randomly chosen replicate plots, representing soil samples from (1) densely vegetated areas, (2) bare trails as a result of non-mechanical trampling, and (3) ground underneath nylon-mesh litter traps set up on trails. We collected 7 classes and at least 17 orders of arthropods, with an estimated mean density of 13,982 ind./m2. The Collembola and Acari were the most common groups. The former dominated in abundance, comprising 8 families (2.5 ± 0.1 per core), followed by the Acari (e.g., oribatids) with at least 37 families (2.2 ± 0.1 per core). The density and number of taxa of arthropod overall, as well as the density and number of families of springtails and oribatids in particular, were highest in soil samples from vegetated areas.
    [Show full text]
  • High Consistency of Trophic Niches in Soil Microarthropod Species
    1 Supplementary materials 2 High consistency of trophic niches in soil microarthropod species 3 (Oribatida, Acari) across soil depth and forest type 4 Authors: Jing-Zhong Lu1*, Peter Cordes1, Mark Maraun1, Stefan Scheu1,2 5 6 Affiliations: 7 1. Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Universität Göttingen, 8 Untere Karspüle 2, 37073 Göttingen, Germany 9 2. Center of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077 10 Göttingen, Germany 11 * Corresponding author (E-mail: [email protected]) 12 13 Supplementary Tables 14 Table S1 15 Species list Oribatida (n = 40). Trophic guilds were assigned according to litter calibrated δ13C and 16 δ15N values: primary decomposer, secondary decomposer, endophagous Oribatida and 17 scavenger/predator. Total number of animals for each species used for stable isotopes and their 18 ranges (min - max) are given. Total number Trophic Oribatid taxa Family (range) δ13C δ15N guilds Ceratozetes minimus Sellnick, 1928 Ceratozetidae 10 (10-10) 2.95 ± 0.06 11.02 ± 0.17 predator Hypochthonius rufulus C. L. Koch, 1835 Hypochthoniidae 4 (2-7) 3.15 ± 0.77 6.23 ± 0.96 predator Metabelba pulverosa Strenzke, 1953 Damaeidae 3 (3-3) 3.08 ± 0.25 6.29 ± 2.40 predator Microppia minus (Paoli, 1908) Oppiidae 19 (7-25) 2.42 ± 0.28 8.74 ± 2.42 predator Oppiella nova (Oudemans, 1902) Oppiidae 14 (8-17) 2.70 ± 1.84 6.73 ± 2.79 predator Oppiella subpectinata (Oudemans, 1900) Oppiidae 9 (3-16) 2.93 ± 0.93 7.28 ± 1.96 predator Suctobelbella spp Jacot, 1937 Suctobelbidae 22 (18-26) 3.00 ± 0.74 6.69 ± 0.72 predator Acrogalumna longipluma (Berlese, 1904) Galumnidae 4 (3-5) 4.41 ± 0.18 5.06 ± 0.12 endophagous Carabodes ornatus Storkan, 1925 Carabodidae 2 (1-3) 3.26 ± 1.79 0.68 ± 0.52 endophagous Liacarus coracinus (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Deformation to Users
    DEFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. IDgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell InArmadon Compai^ 300 Noith Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Conservation of Biodiversity: Guilds, Microhabitat Use and Dispersal of Canopy Arthropods in the Ancient Sitka Spruce Forests of the Carmanah Valley, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. by Neville N.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Fossil Oribatid Mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous Amber of Spain
    Cretaceous Research 63 (2016) 68e76 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes New species of fossil oribatid mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Spain * Antonio Arillo a, , Luis S. Subías a, Alba Sanchez-García b a Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain b Departament de Dinamica de la Terra i de l'Ocea and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, E- 08028 Barcelona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Mites are relatively common and diverse in fossiliferous ambers, but remain essentially unstudied. Here, Received 12 November 2015 we report on five new oribatid fossil species from Lower Cretaceous Spanish amber, including repre- Received in revised form sentatives of three superfamilies, and five families of the Oribatida. Hypovertex hispanicus sp. nov. and 8 February 2016 Tenuelamellarea estefaniae sp. nov. are described from amber pieces discovered in the San Just outcrop Accepted in revised form 22 February 2016 (Teruel Province). This is the first time fossil oribatid mites have been discovered in the El Soplao outcrop Available online 3 March 2016 (Cantabria Province) and, here, we describe the following new species: Afronothrus ornosae sp. nov., Nothrus vazquezae sp. nov., and Platyliodes sellnicki sp. nov. The taxa are discussed in relation to other Keywords: Lamellareidae fossil lineages of Oribatida as well as in relation to their modern counterparts. Some of the inclusions Neoliodidae were imaged using confocal laser scanning microscopy, demonstrating the potential of this technique for Nothridae studying fossil mites in amber.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. the Oribatid Mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata)
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Invertebrates of the H.J. Agriculture Andrews Experimental Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest, Western Cascade Research Station General Technical Report Mountains, Oregon: IV. PNW-217 August 1988 The Oribatid Mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata) Andrew R. Moldenke and Becky L. Fichter I ANDREW MOLDENKE and BECKY FICHTER are Research Associates, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. TAXONOMIC LISTING OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERA * - indicates definite records from the Pacific Northwest *Maerkelotritia 39-40, figs. 83-84 PALAEOSOMATA (=BIFEMORATINA) (=Oribotritia sensu Walker) Archeonothroidea *Mesotritia 40 *Acaronychus 32, fig. 64 *Microtritia 40-41, fig. 85 *Zachvatkinella 32, fig. 63 *Oribotritia 39, figs. 81-82 Palaeacaroidea Palaeacarus 32, fig. 61 (=Plesiotritia) *Rhysotritia 40 Ctenacaroidea *Aphelacarus 32, fig. 59 *Synichotritia 41 Beklemishevia 32, fig. 62 Perlohmannioidea *Perlohmannia 65, figs. 164-166, 188 *Ctenacarus 32, fig. 60 ENARTHRONOTA (=ARTHRONOTINA) Epilohmannioidea *Epilohmannia 65-66, figs. 167-169, Brachychthonioidea 187 *Brachychthonius 29-30, fig. 53 Eulohmannioidea *Eobrachychthonius 29 *Eulohmannia 35, figs. 67-68 *Liochthonius 29, figs. 54,55,306 DESMONOMATA Mixochthonius 29 Crotonioidea (=Nothroidea) Neobrachychthonius 29 *Camisia 36, 68. figs. 70-71, Neoliochthonius 29 73, 177-178, 308 (=Paraliochthonius) Heminothrus 71 Poecilochthonius 29 *Malaconothrus 36, fig. 74 *Sellnickochthonius 29, figs. 56-57 Mucronothrus 36 (=Brachychochthonius) Neonothrus 71 *Synchthonius 29 *Nothrus 69, fig. 179-182, Verachthonius 29 186, 310 Hypochthonioidea *Platynothrus 71, figs. 183-185 *Eniochthonius 28, figs. 51-52 309 (=Hypochthoniella) *Trhypochthonius 35, fig. 69 *Eohypochthonius 27-28, figs. 44-45 *Hypochthonius 28, figs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia
    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 141–149, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.141 The armoured mite fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a long-term study in the Scots pine forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia 1 2 1 Uģis KAGAINIS , Voldemārs SPUNĢIS and Viesturs MELECIS 1 Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, 3 Miera Street, LV-2169, Salaspils, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology,University of Latvia, 4 Kronvalda Blvd., LV-1586, Riga, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In 1992–2012, a considerable amount of soil micro-arthropods has been collected annually as a part of a project of the National Long-Term Ecological Research Network of Latvia at the Mazsalaca Scots Pine forest sites of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve. Until now, the data on oribatid species have not been published. This paper presents a list of oribatid species collected during 21 years of ongoing research in three pine stands of different age. The faunistic records refer to 84 species (including 17 species new to the fauna of Latvia), 1 subspecies, 1 form, 5 morphospecies and 18 unidentified taxa. The most dominant and most frequent oribatid species are Oppiella (Oppiella) nova, Tectocepheus velatus velatus and Suctobelbella falcata. Key words: species list, fauna, stand-age, LTER, Mazsalaca INTRODUCTION Most studies of Oribatida or the so-called armoured mites (Subías 2004) have been relatively short term and/or from different ecosystems simultaneously and do not show long- term changes (Winter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Oribatid Mites in Biodegradation and Mineralization for Enhancing Plant Productivity
    Acarological Studies Vol 1 (2): 101-122 RESEARCH ARTICLE Potential of oribatid mites in biodegradation and mineralization for enhancing plant productivity Mohamed Abdul HAQ Division of Acarology, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Kerala, 673 635, India e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 December 2018 Accepted: 8 May 2019 Available online: 31 July 2019 ABSTRACT: The degradation of litter is an essential process of the soil ecosystem leading to nutrient cycling and is mediated by a heterogeneous group of soil organisms. Oribatid mites represent one of the predominant agents of litter biodegradation in the soil. The ubiquitous presence and extensive diversity of this group of mites make them integral to the process of mineralization of litter in almost all types of soil ecosystems. However, an overall assessment of the mineralization potential of different groups of oribatid mites depicts the relative advantage of lower groups of oribatids, namely the lohmannoid and phthiracaroid members, in the degradation of leafy and woody elements of litter. Degradation of such complex materials primarily necessitates additional qualities such as strong and well developed oral and holding appendages, and the presence of the necessary enteric microflora and associated enzymes, for on-going degradation. In-depth field and laboratory studies of two representative species of the above two groups of mites, viz. Atropacarus (Hoplophorella) chaliyamensis Haq and Xavier, 2005 and Heptacarus hirsutus Wallwork, 1964, with the vegetable crop Vigna unguiculata, clearly demonstrated that these species make a remarkable contribution to the process of nutrient cycling. The combined feeding activity of these two species on the woody elements of litter was found to enhance the release of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium, as evidenced by the increased concentration of these minerals in fecal pellets.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Mite New Species Discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015)
    Zootaxa 4208 (2): 101–126 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4208.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47690FBF-B745-4A65-8887-AADFF1189719 Hotspots of mite new species discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015) GUANG-YUN LI1 & ZHI-QIANG ZHANG1,2 1 School of Biological Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, New Zealand; corresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract A list of of type localities and depositories of new species of the mite order Sarciptiformes published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology) during 2013–2015 is presented in this paper, and trends and patterns of new species are summarised. The 242 new species are distributed unevenly among 50 families, with 62% of the total from the top 10 families. Geographically, these species are distributed unevenly among 39 countries. Most new species (72%) are from the top 10 countries, whereas 61% of the countries have only 1–3 new species each. Four of the top 10 countries are from Asia (Vietnam, China, India and The Philippines). Key words: Acari, Sarcoptiformes, new species, distribution, type locality, type depository Introduction This paper provides a list of the type localities and depositories of new species of the order Sarciptiformes (Acari: Acariformes) published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology (SAA)) during 2013–2015 and a summary of trends and patterns of these new species. It is a continuation of a previous paper (Liu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 10010 Processing Mites and Springtails
    Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute www.abmi.ca Processing Mites (Oribatids) and Springtails (Collembola) Version 2009-05-08 May 2009 ALBERTA BIODIVERSITY MONITORING INSTITUTE Acknowledgements Jeff Battegelli reviewed the literature and suggested protocols for sampling mites and springtails. These protocols were refined based on field testing and input from Heather Proctor. The present document was developed by Curtis Stambaugh and Christina Sobol, with the training material compiled by Brian Carabine. Jim Schieck provided input on earlier drafts of the present document. Updates to this document were incorporated by Dave Walter and Robert Hinchliffe. Disclaimer These standards and protocols were developed and released by the ABMI. The material in this publication does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of any individual or organization other than the ABMI. Moreover, the methods described in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the individual scientists participating in methodological development or review. Errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in this publication are the sole responsibility of ABMI. The ABMI assumes no liability in connection with the information products or services made available by the Institute. While every effort is made to ensure the information contained in these products and services is correct, the ABMI disclaims any liability in negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage which may occur as a result of reliance on any of this material. All information products and services are subject to change by the ABMI without notice. Suggested Citation: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, 2009. Processing Mites and Springtails (10010), Version 2009-05-08.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuberolachnus (Tuberolachniella) Macrotuberculatus Sp
    ANNALES ZOOLOGICI (Warszawa), 2005, 55(3): 315-324 TYLENCHID NEMATODES FOUND ON THE NUNATAK BASEN, EAST ANTARCTICA Alexander Ryss1, Sven Boström2 and Björn Sohlenius2 1Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] 2Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract.— One new, four known and one unidentified species of tylenchid nematodes are described from samples collected on the nunatak Basen, Vestfjella, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Apratylenchoides joenssoni sp. nov. differs from the only other known spe- cies of Apratylenchoides, A. belli Sher, 1973, in having a pumpkin-like spermatheca, shorter dorsal gland lobe, longer tail, and crenate tail tip. Pratylenchus andinus Lordello, Zamith et Boock, 1961, Tylenchorhynchus maximus Allen, 1955, Aglenchus agricola (de Man, 1884) Meyl, 1961 and Paratylenchus nanus Cobb, 1923 were also recorded for the first time in Antarctica. The rather unexpected presence of plant parasitic nematodes in habitats devoid of vascular plants and some biogeographical implications of the findings are discussed. Key words.— Aglenchus, Apratylenchoides, Filenchus, morphology, Nematoda, new species, Paratylenchus, Pratylenchus, taxonomy, Tylenchorhynchus. Introduction Materials and Methods During the Swedish Antarctic Research Expedition Samples of soil, mosses and lichens were collected (SWEDARP) in the austral summer 2001/2002, samples from the nunatak Basen in December 2001 and January of terrestrial material were collected from the nunatak 2002 by Dr. K.I. Jönsson. Site descriptions are given in Basen, Vestfjella, Dronning Maud Land (DML), East Table 1.
    [Show full text]