DOCSLIB.ORG

Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Zootaxa 4666 (1): 001–180 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4666.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA01E30E-7F64-49AB-910A-7EE6E597A4A4 ZOOTAXA 4666 Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER1,3 & ZOË LINDO1 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A0C6, Canada. 2Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Pfingstl: 26 Jul. 2019; published: 6 Sept. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER & ZOË LINDO Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska (Zootaxa 4666) 180 pp.; 30 cm. 6 Sept. 2019 ISBN 978-1-77670-761-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-762-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2019 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press BEHAN-PELLETIER & LINDO Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................5 Historical Overview of Research on Oribatida in Canada and Alaska ...................................................5 Materials and methods .......................................................................................7 Infraorder Palaeosomata ....................................................................................12 Family Acaronychidae ......................................................................................12 Family Archeonothridae .....................................................................................12 Family Palaeacaridae .......................................................................................12 Family Aphelacaridae ......................................................................................12 Family Ctenacaridae .......................................................................................12 Infraorder Enarthronota .....................................................................................13 Family Brachychthoniidae ...................................................................................13 Family Atopochthoniidae ....................................................................................20 Family Pterochthoniidae ....................................................................................20 Family Eniochthoniidae .....................................................................................20 Family Hypochthoniidae ....................................................................................21 Family Mesoplophoridae ....................................................................................22 Family Cosmochthoniidae ...................................................................................22 Family Haplochthoniidae ....................................................................................23 Family Sphaerochthoniidae ..................................................................................23 Family Arborichthoniidae ...................................................................................23 Family Trichthoniidae ......................................................................................23 Infraorder Parhyposomata ...................................................................................23 Family Gehypochthoniidae ..................................................................................24 Family Parhypochthoniidae ..................................................................................24 Infraorder Mixonomata .....................................................................................24 Family Eulohmanniidae .....................................................................................24 Family Perlohmanniidae ....................................................................................25 Family Epilohmanniidae ....................................................................................25 Family Euphthiracaridae ....................................................................................26 Family Oribotritiidae .......................................................................................30 Family Synichotritiidae .....................................................................................32 Family Phthiracaridae ......................................................................................33 Infraorder Desmonomata ....................................................................................39 Hyporder Nothrina .........................................................................................39 Family Crotoniidae ........................................................................................39 Family Hermanniidae .......................................................................................44 Family Malaconothridae ....................................................................................45 Family Nanhermanniidae ....................................................................................47 Family Nothridae ..........................................................................................48 Family Trhypochthoniidae ...................................................................................50 Hyporder Brachypylina .....................................................................................52 Family Hermanniellidae .....................................................................................52 Family Plasmobatidae ......................................................................................53 Family Neoliodidae ........................................................................................53 Family Gymnodamaeidae ...................................................................................53 Family Licnodamaeidae .....................................................................................56 Family Plateremaeidae ......................................................................................56 Family Damaeidae .........................................................................................56 Family Cepheidae .........................................................................................62 Family Nodocepheidae .....................................................................................64 Family Podopterotegaeidae ..................................................................................64 Family Polypterozetidae ....................................................................................65 Family Microzetidae .......................................................................................65 Family Ameridae ..........................................................................................65 Family Caleremaeidae ......................................................................................65 Family Damaeolidae .......................................................................................66 Family Eremobelbidae ......................................................................................66 Family Eremulidae .........................................................................................66 Family Hungarobelbidae ....................................................................................66 Family Eremaeidae ........................................................................................67 Family Megeremaeidae .....................................................................................72 CHECKLIST OF ORIBATID MITES OF CANADA AND ALASKA Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 3 Family Astegistidae ........................................................................................73 Family Gustaviidae ........................................................................................74 Family Kodiakellidae .......................................................................................74 Family Liacaridae .........................................................................................75 Family Peloppiidae ........................................................................................77 Family Tenuialidae .........................................................................................81 Family Carabodidae ........................................................................................82 Family Autognetidae .......................................................................................85 Family Machuellidae .......................................................................................86 Family Oppiidae ...........................................................................................86 Family Quadroppiidae ......................................................................................93 Family Thyrisomidae .......................................................................................94
Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on Oribatid Mites: Prey Preferences and Hunting Behaviour

    Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on Oribatid Mites: Prey Preferences and Hunting Behaviour

    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(2): 339–353, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/2/339 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Specialized feeding of Euconnus pubicollis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on oribatid mites: Prey preferences and hunting behaviour 1 2 PAWEŁ JAŁOSZYŃSKI and ZIEMOWIT OLSZANOWSKI 1 Museum of Natural History, Wrocław University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae, Cyrtoscydmini, Euconnus, Palaearctic, prey preferences, feeding behaviour, Acari, Oribatida Abstract. Prey preferences and feeding-related behaviour of a Central European species of Scydmaeninae, Euconnus pubicollis, were studied under laboratory conditions. Results of prey choice experiments involving 50 species of mites belonging to 24 families of Oribatida and one family of Uropodina demonstrated that beetles feed mostly on ptyctimous Phthiracaridae (over 90% of prey) and only occasionally on Achipteriidae, Chamobatidae, Steganacaridae, Oribatellidae, Ceratozetidae, Euphthiracaridae and Galumni- dae. The average number of mites consumed per beetle per day was 0.27 ± 0.07, and the entire feeding process took 2.15–33.7 h and showed a clear linear relationship with prey body length. Observations revealed a previously unknown mechanism for capturing prey in Scydmaeninae in which a droplet of liquid that exudes from the mouth onto the dorsal surface of the predator’s mouthparts adheres to the mite’s cuticle. Morphological adaptations associated with this strategy include the flattened distal parts of the maxillae, whereas the mandibles play a minor role in capturing prey.
  • Oribátidos (Acari, Oribatida) De La Ribera Del Río Guadalquivir (Sur De España)

    Oribátidos (Acari, Oribatida) De La Ribera Del Río Guadalquivir (Sur De España)

    Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, nº 21 (31/12/2012): 33‒37. ARTÍCULO Grupo Ibérico de Aracnología (S.E.A.). ISSN: 1576 - 9518. http://www.sea-entomologia.org/ ORIBÁTIDOS (ACARI, ORIBATIDA) DE LA RIBERA DEL RÍO GUADALQUIVIR (SUR DE ESPAÑA). DESCRIPCIÓN DE BULLIBATES HYGROPHILUS N. GEN., N. SP. (HERMANNIELLIDAE) Luis S. Subías¹ & Umukusum Ya. Shtanchaeva² ¹ Departamento de Zoología. Facultad de Biología. Universidad Complutense. 28040 Madrid. España ‒ [email protected] ² Instituto de Recursos Biológicos del Caspio de Daguestán. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia. Mahachkala 376000. Rusia ‒ [email protected] Resumen: Se estudian los ácaros oribátidos procedentes de un muestreo de suelos de las riberas del río Guadalquivir en la pro- vincia de Córdoba (Andalucía, sur de España), de donde se han identificado 86 especies. Se describe un nuevo género y especie, Bullibates hygrophilus n. gen., n. sp., de la familia Hermanniellidae y se citan por primera vez 27 especies para la fauna andaluza. Palabras clave: Acari, Oribatida, género nuevo, especie nueva, primeras citas, España, Andalucía, río Guadalquivir. Oribatids (Acari, Oribatida) from the Guadalquivir valley (southern Spain). Description of Bullibates hygrophilus n. gen., n. sp. (Hermanniellidae) Abstract: Oribatid mites from soil samples taken in the riverside of the Guadalquivir valley in Córdoba province (Andalusia, south- ern Spain) are studied. A total of 86 species were identified. A new genus and species of the family Hermanniellidae, Bullibates hy- grophilus n. gen., n. sp., are described. 27 species are also recorded for the first time from Andalusia. Key words: Acari, Oribatida, new genus, new species, first records, Spain, Andalusia, Guadalquivir river. Taxonomía /Taxonomy: Bullibates n.
  • Trampling, Litter Removal, and Variations in the Composition And

    Trampling, Litter Removal, and Variations in the Composition And

    Zoological Studies 48(2): 162-173 (2009) Trampling, Litter Removal, and Variations in the Composition and Relative Abundance of Soil Arthropods in a Subtropical Hardwood Forest Ya-Fu Lee1,2, Yen-Min Kuo1,2, Sheng-Shan Lu2, Duen-Yuh Chen1, Hao-Jiang Jean1, and Jung-Tai Chao2,* 1Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan 2Division of Forest Protection, Taiwan Forest Research Institute, Taipei 100, Taiwan (Accepted July 8, 2008) Ya-Fu Lee, Yen-Min Kuo, Sheng-Shan Lu, Duen-Yuh Chen, Hao-Jiang Jean, and Jung-Tai Chao (2009) Trampling, litter removal, and variations in the composition and relative abundance of soil arthropods in a subtropical hardwood forest. Zoological Studies 48(2): 162-173. Relationships of human trampling and litter removal with physicochemical properties and arthropod diversity of forest soils were studied in a secondary hardwood forest in northern Taiwan. In 4 sampling sessions, 360 soil cores were extracted from 24 randomly chosen replicate plots, representing soil samples from (1) densely vegetated areas, (2) bare trails as a result of non-mechanical trampling, and (3) ground underneath nylon-mesh litter traps set up on trails. We collected 7 classes and at least 17 orders of arthropods, with an estimated mean density of 13,982 ind./m2. The Collembola and Acari were the most common groups. The former dominated in abundance, comprising 8 families (2.5 ± 0.1 per core), followed by the Acari (e.g., oribatids) with at least 37 families (2.2 ± 0.1 per core). The density and number of taxa of arthropod overall, as well as the density and number of families of springtails and oribatids in particular, were highest in soil samples from vegetated areas.
  • High Consistency of Trophic Niches in Soil Microarthropod Species

    High Consistency of Trophic Niches in Soil Microarthropod Species

    1 Supplementary materials 2 High consistency of trophic niches in soil microarthropod species 3 (Oribatida, Acari) across soil depth and forest type 4 Authors: Jing-Zhong Lu1*, Peter Cordes1, Mark Maraun1, Stefan Scheu1,2 5 6 Affiliations: 7 1. Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Universität Göttingen, 8 Untere Karspüle 2, 37073 Göttingen, Germany 9 2. Center of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077 10 Göttingen, Germany 11 * Corresponding author (E-mail: [email protected]) 12 13 Supplementary Tables 14 Table S1 15 Species list Oribatida (n = 40). Trophic guilds were assigned according to litter calibrated δ13C and 16 δ15N values: primary decomposer, secondary decomposer, endophagous Oribatida and 17 scavenger/predator. Total number of animals for each species used for stable isotopes and their 18 ranges (min - max) are given. Total number Trophic Oribatid taxa Family (range) δ13C δ15N guilds Ceratozetes minimus Sellnick, 1928 Ceratozetidae 10 (10-10) 2.95 ± 0.06 11.02 ± 0.17 predator Hypochthonius rufulus C. L. Koch, 1835 Hypochthoniidae 4 (2-7) 3.15 ± 0.77 6.23 ± 0.96 predator Metabelba pulverosa Strenzke, 1953 Damaeidae 3 (3-3) 3.08 ± 0.25 6.29 ± 2.40 predator Microppia minus (Paoli, 1908) Oppiidae 19 (7-25) 2.42 ± 0.28 8.74 ± 2.42 predator Oppiella nova (Oudemans, 1902) Oppiidae 14 (8-17) 2.70 ± 1.84 6.73 ± 2.79 predator Oppiella subpectinata (Oudemans, 1900) Oppiidae 9 (3-16) 2.93 ± 0.93 7.28 ± 1.96 predator Suctobelbella spp Jacot, 1937 Suctobelbidae 22 (18-26) 3.00 ± 0.74 6.69 ± 0.72 predator Acrogalumna longipluma (Berlese, 1904) Galumnidae 4 (3-5) 4.41 ± 0.18 5.06 ± 0.12 endophagous Carabodes ornatus Storkan, 1925 Carabodidae 2 (1-3) 3.26 ± 1.79 0.68 ± 0.52 endophagous Liacarus coracinus (C.
  • Deformation to Users

    Deformation to Users

    DEFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. IDgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell InArmadon Compai^ 300 Noith Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Conservation of Biodiversity: Guilds, Microhabitat Use and Dispersal of Canopy Arthropods in the Ancient Sitka Spruce Forests of the Carmanah Valley, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. by Neville N.
  • New Species of Fossil Oribatid Mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous Amber of Spain

    New Species of Fossil Oribatid Mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous Amber of Spain

    Cretaceous Research 63 (2016) 68e76 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes New species of fossil oribatid mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Spain * Antonio Arillo a, , Luis S. Subías a, Alba Sanchez-García b a Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain b Departament de Dinamica de la Terra i de l'Ocea and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, E- 08028 Barcelona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Mites are relatively common and diverse in fossiliferous ambers, but remain essentially unstudied. Here, Received 12 November 2015 we report on five new oribatid fossil species from Lower Cretaceous Spanish amber, including repre- Received in revised form sentatives of three superfamilies, and five families of the Oribatida. Hypovertex hispanicus sp. nov. and 8 February 2016 Tenuelamellarea estefaniae sp. nov. are described from amber pieces discovered in the San Just outcrop Accepted in revised form 22 February 2016 (Teruel Province). This is the first time fossil oribatid mites have been discovered in the El Soplao outcrop Available online 3 March 2016 (Cantabria Province) and, here, we describe the following new species: Afronothrus ornosae sp. nov., Nothrus vazquezae sp. nov., and Platyliodes sellnicki sp. nov. The taxa are discussed in relation to other Keywords: Lamellareidae fossil lineages of Oribatida as well as in relation to their modern counterparts. Some of the inclusions Neoliodidae were imaged using confocal laser scanning microscopy, demonstrating the potential of this technique for Nothridae studying fossil mites in amber.
  • IV. the Oribatid Mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata)

    IV. the Oribatid Mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata)

    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Invertebrates of the H.J. Agriculture Andrews Experimental Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest, Western Cascade Research Station General Technical Report Mountains, Oregon: IV. PNW-217 August 1988 The Oribatid Mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata) Andrew R. Moldenke and Becky L. Fichter I ANDREW MOLDENKE and BECKY FICHTER are Research Associates, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. TAXONOMIC LISTING OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERA * - indicates definite records from the Pacific Northwest *Maerkelotritia 39-40, figs. 83-84 PALAEOSOMATA (=BIFEMORATINA) (=Oribotritia sensu Walker) Archeonothroidea *Mesotritia 40 *Acaronychus 32, fig. 64 *Microtritia 40-41, fig. 85 *Zachvatkinella 32, fig. 63 *Oribotritia 39, figs. 81-82 Palaeacaroidea Palaeacarus 32, fig. 61 (=Plesiotritia) *Rhysotritia 40 Ctenacaroidea *Aphelacarus 32, fig. 59 *Synichotritia 41 Beklemishevia 32, fig. 62 Perlohmannioidea *Perlohmannia 65, figs. 164-166, 188 *Ctenacarus 32, fig. 60 ENARTHRONOTA (=ARTHRONOTINA) Epilohmannioidea *Epilohmannia 65-66, figs. 167-169, Brachychthonioidea 187 *Brachychthonius 29-30, fig. 53 Eulohmannioidea *Eobrachychthonius 29 *Eulohmannia 35, figs. 67-68 *Liochthonius 29, figs. 54,55,306 DESMONOMATA Mixochthonius 29 Crotonioidea (=Nothroidea) Neobrachychthonius 29 *Camisia 36, 68. figs. 70-71, Neoliochthonius 29 73, 177-178, 308 (=Paraliochthonius) Heminothrus 71 Poecilochthonius 29 *Malaconothrus 36, fig. 74 *Sellnickochthonius 29, figs. 56-57 Mucronothrus 36 (=Brachychochthonius) Neonothrus 71 *Synchthonius 29 *Nothrus 69, fig. 179-182, Verachthonius 29 186, 310 Hypochthonioidea *Platynothrus 71, figs. 183-185 *Eniochthonius 28, figs. 51-52 309 (=Hypochthoniella) *Trhypochthonius 35, fig. 69 *Eohypochthonius 27-28, figs. 44-45 *Hypochthonius 28, figs.
  • The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia

    The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia

    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 141–149, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.141 The armoured mite fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a long-term study in the Scots pine forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia 1 2 1 Uģis KAGAINIS , Voldemārs SPUNĢIS and Viesturs MELECIS 1 Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, 3 Miera Street, LV-2169, Salaspils, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology,University of Latvia, 4 Kronvalda Blvd., LV-1586, Riga, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In 1992–2012, a considerable amount of soil micro-arthropods h