LoanLoan No.: No.: 796−NP 796−NP GrantGrant No.: No.: DSF−8050−NP DSF−8050−NP

Government of

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (Fiscal Year 2017/18)

Implementing Partners

Connecting People’s Capacities Project Management Unit (PMU) , Surkhet, Nepal Phone No.: 977-83-520038, Fax No.: 977-83-525403 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hvap.gov.np September 2018

September, £017

Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2017/18

(16 July 2017 to 17 July 2018)

HIGH VALUE AGRICULTURE PROJECT IN HILL AND MOUNTAIN AREAS (HVAP)

Project Management Unit Birendranagar, Surkhet, Nepal Phone No.:977-83-520038, Fax No.:977-83-525403 Email: [email protected] www.hvap.gov.np September, 2018

(Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Project at a Glance

Country Nepal

Title of the Report Annual Progress Report 2017/18

High Value Agriculture Project In Hill and Mountain Areas Project Title (HVAP)

Project Number Loan No.: 796-NP; Grant No.: DSF-8050-NP

Donor Agency International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) Ministry of Agriculture and LIvestock Development, Executing Agency Government of Nepal Partners SNV-Nepal and Agro Enterprise Centre

Location of the Project 6 Districts from Province 6 and 1 District from Privince 7

Fiscal Year/Reporting Year 2017/18

Reporting Period 16July 2017 to 17July 2018

Year of Implementation 8th Year

Total Project Budget (US$) 18.87 Million

Date of Loan Effectiveness 5 July 2010

Date of Project Start 6 Feb 2011

Project Duration 7.5 Years

Date of Project Completion 30 September 2018

Date of Financing Closing 31 March 2019

Budget of FY 2016/17 Year NRs. 351.8 Million

Financial Achievement of the Reporting NRs. 243.7 Million (70% of the Target) FY 2016/17 Year Cumulative Financial Achievement till NRs. 1572 Million (88 % of the Total Fund allocatedof Reporting Period NRs. 1787 Million) 15,965 Households/26 Agribusinesses/108 LRPs Households covered till reporting year (118% of total target :13555) No. of Women Beneficiaries till 51001 (101% of total target:50,400) reporting year No. of Dalits and Janajatis Beneficiaries 32,065 (153% oftotal target: 21,000) till reporting year Average additional net income per HH NRs.46,055 (Target: NRs. 30,000/HH/ year at the end of in reporting year the project)

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page i September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Financial Achievement (NRs.million) During the Fiscal Year 2017/18 by Components

Financial Achievement (%) during the Fiscal Year 2017/18 by Component (Planned Vs Achieved)

Figure 1: Financial Achievement of the Fiscal Year 2017/18

Page ii High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018

Figure 2: Total Project Budget and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in USD by Financier

Figure 3: Total Project Cost and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in Nepali Rupee by Financier

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page iii

(Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Acknowledgement

It is our pleasure to present the annual progress report of FY 2017/18 of the HVAP including outcomes and achievements realized till the end of this fiscal year. The project has passed more than 97 per cent time of the total project period (7.5 years), covering more than targeted households (118 % of 13,500 HHs) with expenditure of NRs. 1748 million (93%) out of total project budget of NRs. 1888 million (including all financiers). Satisfactory achievements could be made in this year with nearly 70 per cent of expenditure.

In this context, I would like to thank the honourable Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD) and Chairperson of the Project Steering Committee (PSC) and all the members of the PSC for providing directions, guidance and critical suggestions for the successful implementation of the project. Similarly, my sincere thanks go to the Regional Director of Agriculture, Mid Western Development Region and Chairperson of the Project Consultative and Coordination Group (PCCG) and all the members of the PCCG, for their valuable suggestions and guidance for effective implementation of the project at the field level. I also would like to thank the President of Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industries (FNCCI) and Chairperson of the HVAP Agribusiness Working Group for policy advocacy and guidance for the promotion of agribusinesses in the project area.

Likewise, I would like to thank the project implementing partners – Netherlands Development Organization (SNV) and Agro Enterprise Center (AEC) and their officials for providing valuable advisory services and technical supports in the concerned fields during the course of project implementation. I am also thankful to all the project stakeholders at various levels who provided supports during the reporting year.

I would like to thank the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), particularly its Country Program Manager, Country Program Coordinator, Supervision mission and implementation support mission teams for their guidance, supports and cooperation.

Finally, I would like to thank all the HVAP staff for their collective and positive efforts made to get the achievements during last year. My special thanks go to Mr. Krishna Thapa, M&E Expert and entire Planning and M&E team of the HVAP for preparing this report.

Rajendra Prasad Bhari Project Manager September 2018, Surkhet, Nepal

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page v

(Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xii

PROJECT OVERVIEW 1

I. Goal of the Project 1

II. Objectives of the Project 1

III. Target Group 1

IV. Project Approaches 1

V. Implementation Modality 2

A. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 3

B. PROJECT RESULTS 4 I. Major Impacts of the Project 4 II. Major Outcomes and Outputs of the Project 5

1. INCLUSIVE VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT 10

PART ONE: VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS LINKAGES 15

PART TWO: SUPPORT TO VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT 19

SUB-COMPONENT 1.1: FUND AND FACILITIES 19

FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.1: VALUE CHAIN FUND (VCF) 20

FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.2: SECTOR DEVELOPMENT FUND (SDF) 25

FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.3: INCLUSION FUND 26

SUB-COMPONENT 1.2: GROUP FORMATION AND STRENGTHENING 30

SUB-COMPONENT 1.3: GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 33

2. SERVICE MARKET STRENGTHENING 36

SUB-COMPONENT 2.1: MOBILIZATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING

OF SERVICE PROVIDERS 36

SUB-COMPONENT 2.2: PARTNERSHIP AND FINANCIAL SERVICES 40

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT (Including M&E and KM) 42

Financial Achievement 48

C. LESSON LEARNT 51

D. CONCLUDING REMARKS 51

E. ANNEX 52

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page vii September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) LIST OF TABLES: Table 1: Impact indicators and values 4 Table 2: No. of beneficiary households by Value chain till FY 2017/18 6 Table 3: No. of individual beneficiaries 7 Table 4: Average baseline and after intervention net income in 7value chains 7 Table 5: No. of households with increased additional net income of NRs 30,000 by value chain and caste/ethnicity 8 Table 6: Women in Leadership Positions in POs in FY 2017/18 9 Table 7: The Number of Beneficiary Households improved Well Being 9 Table 8: The Ranking of producers’ organization 10 Table 9: Volume (MT) Baseline Vs after Intervention 11 Table 10: Sales Value Baseline Vs after Intervention (Amount in NRs.million) 11 Table 11: The productivity and value chains 13 Table 12: Volume of Production (MT) by Value Chains 13 Table 13: The net labor return by value chains 14 Table 14: Post harvest loss percentage by value chain reporting year 14 Table 15: Number of Groups/Cooperatives having market arrangements with agribusinesses in FY 2017/18 15 Table 16: Score obtained in institutional capacity self-assessment of DCCIs 19 Table 17: Self-evaluation of 7 CCIs and their level 19 Table 18: Sub-projects and Investment by value chains during the Fiscal Year 2017/18 20 Table 19: Sub-projects and Investment (NRs million) by value chains till the Fiscal Year 2017/18 20 Table 20: No. of implemented business plans and cost by Value chain under different funds during reporting year 21 Table 21: No. of implemented business plans and cost by Value chain under VCF W1 till reporting year 22 Table 22: No. of implemented business plans and investments by Value chain under VCF W2 during the reporting year 22 Table 23: No. of implemented business plans and investments by Value chain under VCF W2 till the reporting year 23 Table 24: Value of supply by value chains in the reporting year 23 Table 25: List of infrastructures developed till FY 2017/18 24 Table 26: Grants committed and disbursed amounts by value chains (Amount in NRs million) till the reporting period 25 Table 27: No. of sub-projects and grants under PIF by value chains during FY 2017/18 26 Table 28: Cumulative No. of sub-projects and grants under PPF/PIF by value chains till FY 2017/18 26

Page viii High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 29: No. of participants in technical trainings by gender and caste/ethnicity till the reporting period 29 Table 30: No. of project supported groups/cooperatives and members 30 Table 31: Percentage of Producers’ Organizations and their ranking level (as of July 2018) 31 Table 32: No. of participants in different trainings by caste/ethnicity till the reporting period 32 Table 33: Poverty ranking of beneficiary households by value chain and poverty category till the reporting period 33 Table 34: No. of Trainings and Participants of Capacity Building Trainings 37 Table 35: Value chain functions policy issues 38 Table 36: No.of Trainings and Participants of Capacity Building Trainings to Private Service Providers 39 Table 37: No. of private service providers strengthened/developed and mobilized till the reporting period 39 Table 38: District wise service provided by private service providers to farmers 40 Table 39: No. of Events and Participants 41 Table 40: The no. farmers and amount of loan provided during the reporting period 42 Table 41: Indicators and rating 45 Table 42: List of materials and machineries purcharsed in reporting year 46 Table 43: Financial achievement by component in FY 2017/18 and Cumulative 48 Table 44: Total Project Costs and Expenditure till the end of FY 2016/17 49 Table 45: Status of Disbursement from IFAD (USD) 51

LIST OF FIGURES: Figure 1: Financial Achievement of the Fiscal Year 2017/18 ii Figure 2: Total Project Budget and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in USD by Financier iii Figure 3: Total Project Cost and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in Nepali Rupee by Financier iii Figure 4: Institutional Arrangement 3 Figure 5: Programme Implementation Procedures/Steps 3 Figure 6: Households distribution by value chain and caste/ethnicity 6 Figure 7: Process for B2B linkage among the value chain actors 17 Figure 8: Spider web of Malchari Multiple Cooperative Ltd., Surkhet (an example) 31 Figure 9: Distribution of beneficiary households by Value Chain with poverty ranking as of 15 July, 2018 34 Figure 10: Planned Vs Achievement on Expenditure duringFY 2017/18 49.

LIST OF PICTURES: Picture 1: Plastic tunnel house training, Salyan 27 Picture 2: A vegetable field, Rawatgaon, Jajarkot 27

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page ix September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Picture 3: Carrot seed production field, Jumla 28 Picture 4: BLC Participants, Kalikot 34 Picture 5: BLC TOT Participants, Surkhet 34 Picture 6: PSC Meeting, Kathmandu 43 Picture 7: Media Person collecting information from Private Service Provider, Kalikot 47 Picture 8: HVAP team with Indonesian team in Bali, Indonesia 48

LIST OF ANNEXES: Annex A: Details of Baseline Net income and Additional Net Income by Value Chain 52 Annex B: Physical and Financial Progress of FY 2017/18 and cumulative 53 Annex C: Project Target vs Achievements (Project log frame) 66 Annex D: List of Sub-Projects and Fund 71 Annex E: District Maps with Sub-projects 97 Acronyms ADBL -Agricultural Development Bank Ltd, Nepal AEC -Agro- Enterprise Centre AI -Agricultural Insurance AR -Action Research AWPB -Annual Work Plan and Budget B2B -Business to Business B2S -Business to Service BDS -Business Development Service BLC -Business Literacy Class CCI -Chamber of Commerce and Industry COSOP -Country Strategy Opportunity Program DADC -District Agriculture Development Committee DADO -District Agriculture Development Office DCCI -District Chamber of Commerce and Industry DCED -Donors’ Committee for Enterprise Development DFO -District Forest Office DLSO -District Livestock Service Office EDCOL -Environment Development Cooperative Limited EDS -Environment Development Society EoI - Expression of Interest FG -Farmers’ Group FI -Financial Institution FNCCI -Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce and Industries GeSI - Gender and Social Inclusion GIS -Geographical Information System GoN -Government of Nepal HHs -Households HVAP -High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas HVC -High Value Commodity IB -Inclusive Business

Page x High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 ICIMOD -International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development IFAD -International Fund for Agriculture Development JT -Junior Technician JTA -Junior Technical Assistant KM -Knowledge Management LNGO -Local Non-Government Organization LRP -Local Resource Person LSP -Local Service Provider M&E -Monitoring and Evaluation MAPs -Medicinal and Aromatic Plants MFI -Micro Finance Institution MIS -Management Information System MoALD -Ministry of Agricultue and Livestock Development MoU -Memorandum of Understanding MSP -Multi-Stakeholder Platform MTR -Mid-Term Review NARC -Nepal Agriculture Research Council NGO -Non Government Organization NTFPs -Non Timber Forest Products OMF -Organic Mountain Flavour Pvt. Ltd. OSV -Off-Season Vegetable PCCG -Project Coordination and Consultative Group PIF -Poverty Inclusion Fund PMU -Project Management Unit PO -Producers’ Organization PPF -Production and Post-harvest Support Fund PSC -Project Steering Committee PSP -Private Service Provider RCE -Road Corridor based Experts RD -Regional Directorate REFLECT -Regenerated Ferierean Literacy through Empowering Community Technique RIMS -Result and Impact Management System SDF -Sector Development Fund SIF -Spatial Inclusion Fund SIMES - Standard IFAD Monitoring and Evaluation System SNV -Netherlands Development Organization SP -Service Providers SQCC -Seed Quality Control Centre SWOT -Strength, Weakness, Opportunity & Threat ToT -Training of Trainers USD -United States Dollor VAHW -Village Animal Health Worker VAW - Village Agriculture Worker VC -Value Chain VCA -Value Chain Analysis VCD -Value Chain Development VCF -Value Chain Fund VCFn -Value Chain Finance W1 - Window 1 W2 -Window 2

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page xi September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) is a joint endeavor of the Government of Nepal (GoN) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and is executed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD) in partnership with the Netherlands Development Organization (SNV) Nepal and the Agro-Enterprise Center (AEC) of the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industries (FNCCI).It has completed 7 years of the total project period of 7.5 years. This report covers not only the results of the project activities, accomplished from 16 July, 2017 to 17 July, 2018, but also the cumulative results, since the start of the project. This report also includes the progress updates on the Result and Impact Management System (RIMS), Country Strategy Opportunity Program (COSOP) and Standard IFAD Monitoring and Evaluation System (SIMES). According to the Result and Impact Management System (RIMS) survey conducted in FY 2017/18, the household assets index was increased by 6 percent after intervention of the project activities during the project period. The acute malnutrition (weight for height) was decreased by 6.3 percent, chronic malnutrition (height for age) by 6.6 % and under weight (weight for age) by 11.2 %. The food security situation on the farm households has also been improved after the project intervention (RIMS Survey, 2017/18) The project has contracted 17 producers’ organizations (15 groups and 2 cooperatives) and 2 agribusinesses for co-investment supports during the reporting year 2017/18. Since the start of the project, contracts for co-investment supports were signed with 456 producers’ organizations (320 groups and 136 cooperatives) and 26 agribusinesses. As such, the total number of households benefited from the project reached to 15,965 (118% of the project’s target). Among them, Dalits, Janajatisand Other Caste households represented 16.5%, 14.6% and 68.9% respectively. As such, 31 % Dalits and Janajatis, were involved in the project activities, against the target of 25 %. A total of 51,001 women (101% of the project’s target) and 32,065 Dalits/Janajatis (153% of the project’s target) have received project services till the reporting period. A total of 10,117 women members are actively participating in 456 groups/cooperatives till the reporting year. This accounts for 63 percent of the total member households of these groups/cooperatives as against the target of 60% of women participation at the end of the project. Similarly, a total of 13,357 participating households increased their additional net income, on an average, by NRs. 46,055 (153% of project’s target) in 7 value chains, during the reporting year as against the target of NRs. 30,000 per HH at the end of the project. 49% of the key posts (chair-person, vice chair-person, treasurer and secretary) of the supported groups and cooperatives are held by the women members, as against the target of 50%. A total of 52,111 farmers were trained in technical aspects (6,228); gender and social inclusion (7,650); business literacy (6,484); and social mobilization (29,279) till the reporting year in which 68 percent and 30 percent of the participants’ were women and Dalit & Janajatis respectively. Similarly, a total of 303 private service providers (PSPs) were trained and capacitated through training and exposures during the reporting period, in which there were 96 women participants (32%). The project contracted a total amount of NRs 658 million of which NRs. 447.7 million for groups/ cooperatives, NRs. 118.5 million for agribusinesses, NRs. 65.4 million for market infrastructural development, NRs. 12.4 million for spatial inclusive infrastructures, NRs. 8.4 million for action research and demonstrations and NRs. 6.1 million for private service providers as co-investments for the production, processing, and marketing of high value agriculture products in 7 value chains till the reporting period.

Page xii High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Out of this contract amount, NRs. 527.5 million was disbursed to 682 grantees till the reporting year, which accounted for 80% of the total contracted co-investment amount. Out of the total 456 groups/cooperatives under VCF and PPF/PIF till the reporting year, 151 groups/cooperatives have established market arrangement with 24 agribusinesses during the reporting year in seven value chains. The overall weighted progress during the reporting period was 89.5%. The project spent NRs. 243.7 million, which is 70% of the planned NRs 348 million during the reporting period. Whereas, the cumulative expenditure of the project, till the end of the reporting year, reached to NRs 1,572 million, accounting for 88% of the total project fund (NRs. 1,787 million), excluding contribution from agribusinesses and beneficiaries. Including all sources of fund, USD 17.26 million out of total project cost of USD 18.87 million has been spent till the end of the FY 2017/18, accounting for 91.47 % of progress. In Nepalese currency, NRs. 1748 millioin has been spent out of the total project budget of NRs. 1888 million till the end of the reporting year. The project accomplished most of the planned activities during the reporting year. Having said this, the project is still facing challenges with (i) weak governance and dynamics within the existing groups/cooperatives; (ii) low market led production, (iii) weak relationship due to contract breaches, and (iv) limited mobilization of strong service providersto take up additional value chain responsibilities. The project has already achieved the household coverage, inclusion targets, and additional income targets. The project started to graduate the producers’ organizations based on the value chain approach. This effort is to strengthen and build strong business relation between agribusinesses and producers’ organizations. It is expected, through these strategies, to increase the sustainability of the investments and promote inclusion with quality services to the participating beneficiaries.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page xiii

(Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 PROJECT OVERVIEW

The High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) is a market led initiative that seeks to provide income and employment benefits to poor smallholder farmers and landless through the development and upgrading of pro-poor value chains. Following the Inclusive Business (IB) approach, the project facilitates mutually beneficial and profitable arrangements between the suppliers (producers) and buyers (traders) in High Value Commodity (HVC) value chains and enhances at the same time of the inclusion of marginalized groups. As a result of the newly constructed three road corridors (-Jajarkot, Surkhet- and Surkhet-Jumla), the project focuses on the supply from Achham, Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, Salyan and Surkhet districts.

I. Goal of the Project

The overall goal of the project is the reduction of poverty and vulnerability of women and men in hill and mountain areas of the Mid and Far Western Development Region of Nepal.

II. Objectives of the Project

The main objectives of the project are: l Improved commercial relations and partnerships between agricultural/NTFP/MAP market operators and producers resulting in profitable, efficient and market-orientated production of high value commodities by 13,500 beneficiary households. l Increased participation of poor marginal producers in high value commodity value chains with improved access to agricultural/NTFP markets. l Poor smallholder farmers and other rural producers benefit from sustainable increases in volume and value of production as a result of improved production/collection, value addition and sales of high value niche market products. l Enhanced enabling environment and strengthened local capacity to support market drivenvalue chain.

III. Target Group

The Project aims to benefit about 55 agribusinesses and 13,500 producer households directly and 37,000 households indirectly, residing in the project areas. The target groups among the producers consist of the members of poor and vulnerable households who lack the assets to access resources and make use of opportunities. As such, the project targets 60% women and 25% socially disadvantaged groups such as Dalits and indigenous group (Janajatis) belongs to the project area.

IV. Project Approaches

The project adopts an Inclusive Business approach for Value Chain Development (Component 1) – with the other components directly supporting upgrading and inclusion through service market strengthening (Component 2) and suitable arrangements for project management (Component 3). The project adheres to the following guiding principles: l Demand driven value chain development: the agribusiness with reliable demand as the point of departure with the inclusion of producers in the supply chain.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 1 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) l Producer-agribusiness partnership in business to business value chains with enhanced bargaining power of producers. l Collective marketing by producers: group / cooperative supply and service agreements with agribusiness. Inclusion of women, poor and vulnerable groups like Dalits and Janjatis in value chain groups. l Sustainability of institutions (value chain groups and cooperatives) and processes (value chains that are profitable to both the agribusinesses/traders and the producers). l Facilitate spatial as well as social inclusion promoting equity in project support among the 7 participating districts. l Partnership in implementation: implement the project primarily through local NGOs and local service providers with government/MoALD having overall responsibility and oversight and SNV taking the technical lead in guiding project implementation on value chain approach. l Facilitate value chain financing through a combination of sources: Agribusiness financing linked to agreed contracts, self-generated savings from group savings and credit schemes, loans from local Micro Finance Institutions and other commercial finance, a project value chain grant fund for co-investments, and a project production and post-harvest fund for small grants support.

V. Implementation Modality

The Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD) has the overall responsibilities for the project implementation. Within the Project Management Unit (PMU) in Surkhet, the SNV Nepal and AEC staff supports inclusive value chain development in component 1. This takes place within value chain teams where MoALD staff and designated experts support the inclusion of specific groups, manage the designated funds and provide production related technical supports. MoALD designated experts steer the service market development in component 2, supported by both SNV and AEC staff. The majority of the project services are facilitated by the district based local NGOs, backstopped by the PMU contracted Road Corridor based Experts (RCEs) in close coordination with the DADOs/DLSOs/DFOs of the respective project districts. The project’s collaborative framework comprises of three main bodies: Project Steering Committee (PSC), HVAP Agribusiness Working Group, both Kathmandu-based, and an area-based Project Consultative and Coordination Group (PCCG) based in Surkhet. The Figures 4 and 5 explain the institutional arrangement and steps in programme implementation respectively.

Page 2 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018

•Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD) •Project Steering Committee (PSC) Central Level •Partners (SNV-Nepal and AEC) •Agribusiness Working Group

•Project Coordination and Consultative Group (PCCG) Regional Level •Regional Directrorates of Agriculture, Livestock Services and Forestry

•HVAP District Working Group (District Agriculture Development Committee: DADC) •District Line Agencies (Agriculture, Livestock Services and District Level Forestry) •District Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DCCI) •Local NGOs •Public Audit Groups

•Groups Community Level •Cooperatives •Agribusiness

Figure 4: Institutional Arrangement

Value Development of Call for Sub- Chain Value Chain Projects from Implementation Result-based Selection Intervention Groups/Coops/ of Monitoring & and Strategy and Agribusinesses Sub-Projects Evaluation Analysis Action Plan and Selection

Gender and Social Inclusion, Social Mobilization, B2B Linkages, Agribusiness Engagement, Contract Facilitation, Coordination and Management

Figure 5: Programme Implementation Procedures/Steps

A. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is: l To inform the donor, implementing agencies, project partners, stakeholders, project staff and concerned beneficiaries about the progress of the project; and l To update the status of the project.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 3 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) B. PROJECT RESULTS I. Major Impacts of the Project

Impact 1: Household Assets Index Increased by 18 Percent

The household assets index was increased by 6 percent after intervention of the project activities during the project period. The baseline figure (12.3) in FY 2012/13 was increased to 13.06 in FY 2017/18, according to the result of study of the Result and Impact Management System’s (RIMS) 3rd level indicators. The detail is given in Table 1.

Table 1: Impact indicators and values

Indicator Unit Benchmark Completion Achieved Remarks (2012/13) (2017/18) Percent Households with improvement in 12.3 13.06 6 57 % HHs household assets ownership index increased the household assets index Underweight children - weight for age % total 25.9 23 -11.20 % girls 25.9 22 -15.06 % boys 25.9 24 -7.34 Chronic malnourished children % total 47.1 44 -6.58 - height for age % girls 44.4 43.6 -1.80 % boys 49.5 45 -9.09 Acute malnurished children % total 9.5 8.9 -6.32 - weight for height % girls 8.5 7.9 -7.06 % boys 10.4 13 25.00 Households experiencing one hungry % 53.7 44 -17.99 season Month duration of first hungry season Number 4.3 4 -6.98 Households experiencing two hungry % 36.0 34 -5.66 seasons Month duration of second hungry season Number 3.4 3.8 11.76 Female household members that can read % 42.2 79 87.20 Male household members that can read % 69.0 87 26.09 Ratio of women to men between 15 and % 73.9 117 58.32 24 that can read Source: HVAP RIMS Survey 2017/18

Impact 2: Child Malnutrition Decreased

The malnourished children of below age of 5 year, was decreased after the project intervention. The RIMS study showed that the acute malnutrition (weight for height) was decreased by 6.3 percent. Similarly, the chronic malnutrition (height for age) and under weight (weight for age) were decreased by 6.6 % and 11.2 % respectively.

Page 4 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Children who fail to maintain sufficient weight for height is called wasting or acute malnourished children under 5 years age. The weight for height is used to measure the current nutritional status of the children. The acute malnourished children were decreased from 9.5% to 8.9% in overall. The acute malnourished children (girls) were decreased from 8.5% to 7.9% where the acute malnourished children (boys) were increased from 10.4% to 13%. The acute malnutrition was higher among the boys compared to girls in both surveys (baseline and endline).

Children who did not maintain the sufficient height according to their age is called stunting or chronic malnutrition. The percentage of children below five years of age having chronic malnutrition was 44% in final survey against baseline survey 47.1%. It reveals that the chronic malnutrition was decreased by 1.8 percent during the project period. However, the chronic malnutrition was higher among boys as compared to girls in both the surveys.

Children who did not maintain the standard weight according to their age is called underweight. The weight for age is the major indicator of child growth. The underweight children were decreased from 25.9% to 23% i.e. 11.2% decreased in both girls and boys. Gender wise, the underweight problem among boys improved to some extent ascompared to girls from baseline to endline. The detail information on malnourished children is given in Table 1.

Impact 3: Increased in Food Security Period

The number of beneficiary households who faced first hungry season was decreased and the period (month) of hungry also decreased implying the food security period of the beneficiary households increased after the project intervention. The households who faced first hungry season was decreased from 53.7% to 44%, i.e. decreased by 18 percent. Likewise, the hungry period also decreased from 4.3 month to 4 month.

The households who faced second hungry season decreased from 36% to 34%, i.e. decreased by almost 6 percent. But, the second hungry period increased from 3.4 month to 3.8 month. Details are illustrated in Table 1.

II. Major Outcomes and Outputs of the Project

Project Outreach

Outreach 1: 648 additional households (HHs) received project services in the reporting year.

The project provided its services to 648 households in the reporting year. Since the beginning of the project, the project provided services to 15,965 households in 7 project districts. It supported them with inputs for market led production of 7 value chain commodities. Among the households benefitted, 31.1% was from Dalits and Janajatis (16.5% and 14.6% respectively) and 68.9 % from Other Caste. The project has achieved 118% of the total target (13,500) till the end of FY 2017/18. A total of 29 households from the ginger value chain were removed from the list of beneficiary households due to their inactiveness.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 5 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Of the total beneficiary households (15,965), the maximum of 4,223 (26.5%) households are involved in the OSV value chain and the minimum of 450 (2.8%) households in vegetable seed value chain. Likewise, of the 31.1% inclusion of Dalit and Janajati households, on an average, the ginger value chain included a maximum of 43.5 percent Dalit and Janjati households and a minimum of 9.7 percent households in apple value chain. The details are given in Table 2 and Figure 6.

Table 2: No. of beneficiary households by Value chain till FY 2017/18

Cumulative till the FY 2017/18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Other % in Total Achieved- Other % in Dalit Janajatis Total Dalit Janajatis Total Castes Total Target Percent Castes Total Apple 194 6 1907 2107 13.2 1998 105 4 1 90 95 15 Ginger 194 439 822 1455 9.1 1998 73 (10) (7) (12) (29) -4 Goat 727 560 2473 3760 23.6 2700 139 29 58 137 224 35 OSV 550 641 3032 4223 26.5 2700 156 32 9 254 295 46 Timur 503 368 1334 2205 13.8 702 314 - - 2 2 0 Turmeric 402 307 1056 1765 11.1 2700 65 3 57 1 61 9 Veg. Seed 67 11 372 450 2.8 702 64 - - - - 0 Total 2637 2332 10996 15965 13500 118 58 118 472 648 Percent 16.5 14.6 68.9 9.0 18.2 72.8

Figure 6: Households distribution by value chain and caste/ethnicity

Outreach 2: 4303 additional individual beneficiaries receiving project services

In Project Year 8 (PY8), 4303 individual beneficiaries received the project services, out of which 48.45%

Page 6 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 (2,048) are women and 51.55% are men. Till the PY 8, 107,860 individual beneficiaries received the project services. So far, 101% of total target of women and 153% of the total target of Dalits and Janajatis received the project services. Till the PY8, the project reached 133% of total target of beneficiaries with project services. More details are provided in Table 3.

Table 3: No. of individual beneficiaries

Target Achieved Achieved % Achieved in FY 2017/18 No. of Producer Organizations 500 456 91 17 No. of Direct Beneficiary Households 13500 15965 118 648 No. of Direct Individual Beneficiaries 81000 107860 133 4303 No. of Indirect Beneficiary Households 37000 43590 118 6460 No. of Indirect Individual Beneficiaries 80000 248621 311 29124 No. of Individual Women Beneficiaries 50400 51001 101 2085 No. of Dalit and Janjati Beneficiaries 21000 32065 153 569 Total No. of Individual Beneficiaries 161000 354058 220 33427

Project Outcomes

Outcome 1: Average additional net income increased by NRs. 46,055 (reporting year target- NRs. 34,684).

During the last fiscal year 2017/18, the average additional net income increased by NRs. 46,055 in 7 value chains as against the target of NRs. 34,684. This result of additional net income was based on 13,357 HHs (out of 15,965 HHs), which have already received at least one season production in the respective value chains.

While making a comparison of increased net income per household among the 7 value chains, the off season vegetable (OSV) value chain showed the highest net income increment (NRs. 79,329), followed by the goat value chain (NRs.47,015). The lowest net income increment was found in the Turmeric value chain (NRs. 13,820). The average rate of additional income increment was estimated to be 3.5 times as compared to the baseline income (current cost). More details are provided in Table 4 and Annex A.

Table 4: Average baseline and after intervention net income in 7 value chains (NRs.) Achieved % After Intervention Increased Increased Involved Baseline based on Target (FY 2017/18) (by) (times) HHs of NRs. 30,000 Apple 13,314 47,065 33,751 2.5 113 1850 Ginger 7,007 21,153 14,145 2.0 47 1045 Goat 25,025 72,040 47,015 1.9 157 3428 OSV 11,770 91,099 79,329 6.7 264 3865 Timur 5,203 37,367 32,165 6.2 107 1414 Turmeric 4,391 18,210 13,820 3.1 46 1383 Veg Seed 1,917 16,906 14,989 7.8 50 372 Average 13,280 59,335 46,055 3.5 154 13357

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 7 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Outcome 2: 5,286 Households increased income by minimum of NRs.30,000 (total target- 13,500 HHs)

5,286 households, out of 13,221 households, which were involved in sales of products, increased net income minimum by NRs. 30,000 during the reporting year, which is 33.1 % of the participating households (15,965), of which 25.2% were from Dalit and Janjati households and 74.8% from other caste households. The highest 2,173 households from off-season vegetables earned an additional income of at least NRs 30, 000, followed by 1,513 households from goat value chain. The details are given in table 5.

Table 5: No. of households with increased additional net income of NRs 30,000 by value chain and caste/ethnicity

Households Households Households (Well Being Ranking) Value (Social Caste) (Gender) Total Involved Beneficiary Chain Extreme Moderately Near Non- Other HHs HHs Households Dalit Janjati Male Female Poor Poor Poor Poor Caste Apple 172 430 202 10 58 1 755 269 545 814 1821 2107 Ginger 33 58 26 17 6 28 100 52 82 134 1045 1455 Goat 426 565 364 158 254 202 1057 618 895 1513 3414 3760 Off season 578 785 528 282 242 289 1642 697 1476 2173 3836 4223 vegetable Timur 167 235 51 28 80 133 268 274 207 481 1407 2205 Turmeric 21 41 17 32 17 17 77 53 58 111 1326 1765 Vegetable 39 17 3 1 4 - 56 21 39 60 372 450 Seeds Total 1436 2131 1191 528 661 670 3955 1984 3302 5286 13221 15965 Percent in 30,000 27.2 40.3 22.5 10.0 12.5 12.7 74.8 37.5 62.5 earned HHs Percent in Involved 10.9 16.1 9.0 4.0 5.0 5.1 29.9 15.0 25.0 40.0 HHs Percent in Beneficiary 9.0 13.3 7.5 3.3 4.1 4.2 24.8 12.4 20.7 33.1 HHs

Outcome 3: 49% of key posts of the supported POs held by women (total target-50%).

49% of the key posts of the supported groups and cooperatives are held by women members. The total numbers of key posts in those 456 groups/cooperatives are 1,824 out of which 980 are held by women, where the target was 50% the key posts of 500 groups and cooperatives. This indicates that women have increased access to decision making in the supported groups and cooperatives. Likewise, 31 percent of the groups/cooperatives are led by women.

The project achieved 15% more women membership (63%) in producers’ organizations in the reporting year than that of the baseline (55%). Likewise, the project achieved 19% more (49%) in the key posts held by the women, as compared to the baseline (41%). More details are provided in Table 6.

Page 8 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 6: Women in Leadership Positions in POs in FY 2017/18

Percentage of women in Comparing results of current year with the baseline key posts in Producers’ Women Membership Women Leadership Organizations (POs) in POs in POs Chairperson 31 Baseline 55% 41% Vice-Chairperson 59 Target 60% 50% Secretary 38 Achieved 63% 49% Achieved Against the Treasurer 69 15% 19% Baseline Achieved Against the Total 49 105% 98% Target

Outcome 4: The Well Being of the Beneficiary Households Improved.

The well being of the beneficiary households has been increased at the end of the project. Before the intervention of the project the 26 percent beneficiary households fell in extreme poor decreased to 5 percent in FY 2017/18. It means 21% households under extreme poor improved their well being after project’s intervention. Likewise, 20% moderately poor households moved to higher economic status. Due to this upgrading in the economic status of the poor households, percents of near-poor and none- poor have been increased by 16 and 25% respectively. In overall, 41% of the extreme poor and poor households have shifted to near poor and none-poor household category. The detail is given in Table 7.

Table 7: The Number of Beneficiary Households improved Well Being

Percentage of Percentage of Improved Improved Category of Achieved Beneficiary Households Beneficiary Households Percentage Percentage Wellbeing Percentage (Before Intervention) (After Intervention) (4 Categories) (2 Categories) Extreme Poor 26 5 -21 -81 -41 Moderately Poor 44 24 -20 -45 Near Poor 20 36 +16 +80 +41 Non-Poor 10 35 +25 +250

Outcome 5: Institutional Capacities of the Producers’ Organizations Increased.

The producers’ organizations have increased their institutional capacities. The producers’ organizations were categorized in five ranking levels: outstanding (above 90% score), excellent (80-89% score), Satisfactory (60-79% score), poor (50-59% score) and very poor (below 50% score). Before the project intervention no one producers’ organization fell in excellent and satisfactory categories, now the no. of producers’ organization increased in excellent and satisfactory category by 5% and 42.6 % respectively. Only 39 percent of producers’ organization fell in poor category (poor and very poor) after project intervention, which was 86.6% in the baseline. It means that 47.5% of the poor category POs could increase their capacities to upper level (satisfactory and excellent) categories. Out of total, 61 percent beneficiary households now fall in satisfactory and excellent categories in terms of their institutional capacities in FY 2017/18. The detail is given in Table 8.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 9 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Table 8: The Ranking of producers’ organizations

Percentage of Producer’s Organization Percentage of Producer’s Organization Ranking Level Score (%) (before project intervention) (after project intervention) Outstanding Over 90 0 0 Excellent 80-89 0 5.0 Satisfactory 60-79 13.3 55.9 Poor 50-59 29.2 19.3 Very Poor Under 50 57.4 19.8

Major Achievements by Component during the Reporting Year and Cumulative since the beginning of the project

The project has accomplished most of the planned activities of the fiscal year 2017/18. As such, the project’s physical and financial achievements are 89% and 70% respectively. The immediate outputs and short-term outcomes of major activities are explained component-wise in the following paragraphs. The detailed data of the project can be viewed in the project MIS:www.hvapmis.gov.np.The details of targets Vs achievements are illustrated in Annex B.

1. INCLUSIVE VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Outcome 1: 40 % (6,386HHs) of project beneficiaries reported improved terms of trade after two years (in term of price, payment timing and services provided) (total target-10,125).

6,386 project beneficiary households out of 15,965 reported to have improved terms of trade during the reporting period. These households were directly linked with agribusinesses during the reporting year. The agribusinesses and producers’ organizations (POs) agreed on volumes and quality of products, payment time, embedded services to POs in their contracts.

Outcome 2: 82% Agribusiness indicates expectation of continuation of market arrangement after project ending (total target-75%).

The sixteen project supported agribusinesses established and continued market arrangement with 151 groups and cooperatives for the harvest of the current fiscal year 2017/18. 215 out of 456 groups/ cooperatives renewed their contracts verbal and written for coming year too. The project facilitated on tripartite agreement involving DCCIs, agribusinesses and POs. It showed a continuation of market arrangements for the coming years.

Outcome 3: Volume of traded goods (sales) increased with an equivalent of 255% over a 3 year period (value at farm gate) (total target-26,145 Mt; and 9,327 Mt in reporting year)

The total traded volume of goods increased by 2.6 times compared to the baseline volume during the reporting year with highest percentage in off-season vegetable (393%) and lowest in Timur (52%). However, the highest volume was increased by Vegetable value chain (8,152 MT) due to the high volume low value crop and lowest in vegetable seed (18 MT) compared to the baseline volume.

Page 10 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 The traded value of 13,357 households was NRs. 870 million in FY 2017/18, where the baseline value was NRs 225 million for the same households, increased by 287%. The highest sales value increased by 580% in Vegetable value chain followed by Timur (533%), whereas, lowest was in Ginger value chain (132%). The detail is given in Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9: Volume (MT) of Production in Baseline Vs after Intervention

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % Involved HHs (FY 2017/18) Apple 1156.9 1778.0 621.1 54 1850 Ginger 378.5 834.7 456.2 121 1045 Goat 285.2 901.8 616.6 216 3428 OSV 2073.8 10225.3 8151.5 393 3865 Timur 65.0 98.8 33.8 52 1414 Turmeric 292.8 1253.1 960.3 328 1383 Veg Seed 9.0 27.2 18.2 203 372 Total 4261.1 15119.0 10857.9 255 13357

Table 10: Sales Value in Baseline Vs after Intervention (Amount in NRs.million)

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % Involved HHs (FY 2017/18) Apple 31.6 93.7 62.1 196 1850 Ginger 10.4 24.1 13.8 132 1045 Goat 106.9 264.5 157.6 147 3428 OSV 57.8 392.9 335.1 580 3865 Timur 9.2 57.9 48.8 533 1414 Turmeric 7.8 29.4 21.6 277 1383 Veg Seed 1.3 7.3 6.0 467 372 Total 225.0 869.9 644.9 287 13357

Outcome 4: 108 functioning input suppliers and service providers (LRPs, agro-vets and cooperatives) /total target-130.

The project selected and trained 193 Local Resource Person (LRPs) and Agro-vets/Para-vets to provide the services at local level to beneficiary households in different value chains till the reporting period. Out of 193 LRPs, 108 LRPs received project grants and they are providing services to the farmers. The project has made plan to strengthen the capacity of the government service centers to mobilize the private service providers/LRPs within the periphery of the service centers. The project has also facilitated to rest of the LRPs, who have received training from the project, to submit the proposal for co-financing, if needed.

Outcome 5: 13,357 producers reporting increased use of quality inputs and services disaggregated by gender, caste/ethnicity, poverty and value chain (total target-10,125).

The project has invested in groups/cooperatives for quality seeds and breed especially in the ginger, turmeric and goat value chains. The project has directly linked with Agro-vets/para-vets to provide the

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 11 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) quality services to the farmers. 13,357 out of 15,965 beneficiary households increased the use of quality inputs and services during the reporting year in all value chains. It is 84 percent of the total beneficiary households. The highest, 29 percent farmers from the Off-season value chain, and the lowest, 3 percent farmers from the vegetable seed value chain used the quality inputs and services provided by the project among the seven value chains.

Outcome 6: 17 additional value chain groups/cooperatives have access to technical advisory services facilitated by the project (total target-500/reporting year target-25).

17 additional groups/cooperatives have accessed technical services during the reporting period. All together 456 groups/cooperatives are getting access to technical services from the project. The Local Resource Persons, NGOs, district line agencies and PMU technical team were providing technical advisory services to the farmers at farm level as per their crop plans. The project has also made agreements with 45 service providers in the reporting year (total: 108), who are providing technical services at the community levels. It will help to increase the access to technical services in the coming years.

Outcome 7: 406 traders, cooperatives and businesses reporting improved service delivery by DCCIs and AEC (quality and value) in each value chain (total target-205).

406 grantees (380 producers’ organizations and 26 agribusinesses) were reporting improved service delivery by the DCCIs and AEC. The DCCIs, and AEC in support of the PMU staff are facilitating to producers’ organizations and agribusinesses to improve the business relations till the reporting year. The project has facilitated in developing the institutional capacities of the DCCIs and facilitated them to develop their own capacity development plans. The DCCIs have been providing business development services and market price information to the value chain actors to establish and strengthen the linkages among the value chain actors.

Outcome 8: 444 producer organizations (97%) supported operating profitable at the end of the project (total target-375 (75%) of the total 500 organizations).

A total of 444 producers’ organizations sold their products to the traders during the reporting period. Only 12 producers’ organizations (2.6%) out of 456 were unable to get a net additional income during the reporting period. This implies that 97% of the 456 supported producers’ organizations operating profitable during the reporting period.

Outcome 9: 8,079 HHs reported an increase in productivity in high value agricultural products by at least 10% (total target-13,500 HHs).

8,079 households out of 15,965 households increased their productivity by more than 10% during the reporting year. The highest 35% productivity increased in Turmeric value chain against the baseline productivity, followed by Timur (29%) and least in vegetable seed value chain (10%). There were decreased in productivity in Apple and Goat value chain. The quality seeds/breeds, technical services and improved technologies helped to increase the productivity. The detail about the productivity is given in Table 11.

Page 12 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 11: The productivity of value chains in Baseline Vs after Intervention

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % Involved HHs (FY 2017/18) Apple 169.6 151.4 -18.2 -11 1850 Ginger 458.6 584.6 125.9 27 1045 Goat 25.0 22.8 -2.2 -9 3428 OSV 453.1 530.1 77.0 17 3865 Timur 1.4 1.8 0.4 29 1414 Turmeric 407.6 551.4 143.8 35 1383 Veg Seed 23.5 25.9 2.4 10 372

Outcome 10: 11,366 MT increased production of selected high value agricultural products (total target-31,000/reporting year target-11,777).

11,366 tons of total additional production was reported by 13,357 households where the baseline total production was 5,282 tons. The participating households increased production by 215 percent in the 7 value chains during the reporting period. The off-season vegetable value chain has highest increased production (338%) followed by Turmeric value chain (316%) and apple being the least (40%) as against the baseline production. The detail is given in Table 12.

Table 12: Volume of Production (MT) by Value Chains in Baseline Vs after Intervention

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % Involved HHs (FY 2074.75) Apple 1647.2 2301.4 654.1 40 1850 Ginger 415.5 1022.2 606.6 146 1045 Goat 315.2 901.8 586.6 186 3428 OSV 2506.8 10977.7 8470.9 338 3865 Timur 70.3 101.1 30.8 44 1414 Turmeric 316.0 1313.8 997.7 316 1383 Veg Seed 10.8 29.8 19.0 175 372 Total 5282.0 16647.7 11365.7 215 13357

Outcome 11: 13,357 HHs realizing an increase in net return to HHs labor from high value agricultural products by at least 10%, disaggregated by gender, caste/ethnicity, poverty and value chain (total target-13,500).

13,357 households from 7 value chains increased their net return to household labor by 178 percent during the reporting year. The household labour return was NRs. 6 in per rupee of labour investment in the baseline and it increased to NRs 17.5 ruppes. The net return rate is high in Vegetable seed value chain (390%) and low in turmeric (34%) among the seven value chains. The detail is given in Table 13.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 13 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Table 13: The net labor return by value chains in Baseline Vs after Intervention

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % Involved HHs (FY 2017.18) Apple 6.1 20.6 14.5 238 1850 Ginger 4.0 15.0 11.0 279 1045 Goat 7.7 34.0 26.3 339 3428 OSV 5.3 14.8 9.5 179 3865 Timur 5.1 10.5 5.4 106 1414 Turmeric 6.8 9.1 2.3 34 1383 Veg Seed 1.9 9.1 7.3 390 372 Average 6.3 17.5 11.2 178 13357

Outcome 12: 100% of the infrastructure and equipment financed by the Value Chain Fund is functioning and appropriately maintained at the end of the project.

The infrastructures developed and equipments provided from the project are being used by the value chain actors specially producers, processers and agribusinesses and are functional. The processing equipments in turmeric and ginger value chains are seasonally used due to limited and seasonal supply of fresh ginger and turmeric. The project has facilitated to producers’ organizations to increase the production area to meet the demand of processing units. The producers’ organizations have started to establish maintenance fund and operating mechanisms to operate the infrastructure and equipment sustainably. The number of infrastructures constructed is given in the Table 25.

Outcome 13: Post harvest loss decreased by 56% (total target-33% reporting year target-33%).

The post-harvest loss decreased in the seven value chains, on an average, by 56% than baseline. This may be due to the project’s supports in post harvest handling skills, storage, gravity ropeway, packaging, transportation vehicles, harvesting tools, harvesting bags etc. to the producer’s organizations and agribusinesses. Average post harvest loss was 9% in baseline in all value chains, which decreased to 4% accounting 56% decrease during the reporting period. Comparing among value chains, the post harvest loss was reduced by 77% in timur value chain, followed by Vegetable seed value chian (65%), and least in Apple value chain (25%). Whereas, it increased in Ginger value chain (9%), which may be due to long time of storage and loss during transportation. The detail is given in Table 14.

Table 14: Post harvest loss percentage by value chain in Baseline Vs after Intervention

After Intervention Baseline Changed Changed % (FY 2017/18) Apple 14.3 10.7 -3.5 -25 Ginger 4.6 5.0 0.4 9 OSV 7.0 2.8 -4.2 -60 Timur 4.6 1.1 -3.5 -77 Turmeric 3.4 1.3 -2.1 -61 Veg Seed 11.9 4.1 -7.8 -65 Average 9.0 4.0 -5.0 -56

Page 14 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Outcome 14: 648 additional households have increased access to productive assets (inputs, processing equipment, tools and technical assistance) disaggregated by gender, caste/ethnicity, poverty in each value chain

648 households have increased access to productive assets during the reporting year. The project has supported them with inputs, processing equipment, tools and technical assistance during the reporting period through different investment funds (VCF W1, VCF W2 and PPF/PIF). The total number of households till the reporting year reached to 15,965 who have increased access in productive assets. The detail no. of households is given in Table 2.

PART ONE: VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS LINKAGES

Output 1.1: 17 additional groups/cooperatives have established market arrangement (total target-150).

17 additional groups/cooperatives have established market arrangements with traders during the reporting period in 6 value chains. The formal contracts have been made between groups/cooperatives and traders with agreements on volume of product, value of product, quality of product, time of delivery, payment modality and the provision of embedded services. The total market arrangements was reached to 151, this means these 151 groups/cooperatives were directly linked with 16 agribusinesses making buy back arrangement out of 456 value chain groups/ cooperatives till the reporting year. These market arrangements made buyback guarantee of 5677 MT of volume of contracts except goat value chain also continued in the reporting year too. The project targeted 150 market arrangements based on the number of value chain fund supported groups and cooperatives. The no. of total market arrangements during the reporting period is given in Table 15.

Table 15: Number of Groups/Cooperatives having market arrangements with agribusinesses in FY 2017/18

Contract Value Est. VC Contract proponents Volume Remarks (NR million) (Mt) -Prakash Falful Mandis: 2 POs Kalikot, 26 POs 909 49.96 Grade A & B Apples Jumla Apple -Lima Falful Firm:4 POs Kalikot 137 6.16 Grade A & B Apples (3 Ag+ 32 POs) Grade C & D -RK Processing Industries, Jumla: 26 POs 95 2.15 Apples (Price 20-25/kg) -MANE FILs Via. HBTL and Local Trader: 4 POs of Salyan:5.87 MT -Cosmo Herbal, France Via HBTL: Sarughad Timur Coop, Jajarkot:0.85 MT Price @ 360/kg (3 Ag + 12 38.72 15.98 -Satya Enterprises, Nepalgunj Via. Local Trader: to 550/kg POs) 2 POs of Surkhet: 20 MT -Dabur Nepal, Birgunj Via Local Traders: 5 POs Salyan, Surkhet, Jajarkot:12 MT

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 15 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Contract Value Est. VC Contract proponents Volume Remarks (NR million) (Mt) Vegetable Seed -SAEN seed Company: 1 POs of Salyan, 1 104.2 19.99 (1 Ag+8 Dailekh, 4 Jumla & 2 Surkhet : 104.2 MT POs) Ginger -Organic Mountain Flavor (OMF): 15 POs of (1Ag+15 238 7.14 Price @ 30/kg Surkhet POs) -Devkota Mandis + via. Local Traders: 3 POs of Price @ 20-35/kg Salyan + 8 POs of Jajarkot + 12 POs of Surkhet 808 26.38 including potato of including Piladi/Dharampokhara belt Jumla -Acharya Tarkari Pasal, Kalikot: 11 POs of OSV 784 20.51 Price @ 40-50 /kg Kalikot including potato (Vegetables) (6 Ag+77 -Puja Mandis : 6 POs of Surkhet 274 8.34 Price @ 20-35/kg POs) -Babu Shahi Mandis : 20 POs of Surkhet, Price @ 20-35/kg Dailekh including Piladi belt/Dharampokhara 1302 42.06 including potato of belt Jumla -Himali Suppliers/Govinda Mandis: 8 POs of 498 11.36 Price @ 20-40/kg Surkhet West; 1 of Surkhet North -Pandey Mandis: 8 POs of Guranse, Dailekh 385 8.89 Avg. Price @ 35-/kg Turmeric Fresh Rhizome (Fresh+ -Bhattarai Masala Comp. :3 POs of Surkhet 29.6 0.65 (Dried 160/kg; Gitti) (22.4 MT Fresh & 1.2 Dried) Fresh @ 20/kg) 1 Ag+3 POs) Turmeric -Kushe Herbal & Minerals Pvt Ltd.: 5 POs of (Fresh) 74.6 1.20 Fresh @ 15/kg Salyan & Jajarkot (74.6 MT fresh @ 15/kg) 1 Ag+4 POs) 16 Agri- business Total 5677.12 220.77 and 151 POs

Output 1.2: 2 Multi Stakeholders Platform (MSP) Workshops conducted

Two MSPs were organized for two out of seven value chains: Goat and Off-season vegetable during the reporting year. The MSPs brought different stakeholders of the respective value chains together to review the interventions conducted by VC actors, support organizations and create B2B and B2S linkages among the actors.

The MSPs were helpful in developing better understanding on terms of trade, develop demand supply status (balance sheet) of the respective value chain addressing immediate constraints or opportunities for business relationship and consequently improve performance. The overall MSP process has increasingly created foundation for the value chain actors to take responsibility for the development of the sub-sector as a whole.

Likewise, different services required for the actors along the chain were identified. Existing service providers in the project area were also mapped. As such, the project is establishing B2S linkages that facilitate service market development and increase the purchase of business support services required

Page 16 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 by the value chain actors. Moreover, MSP in particular OSV was used to share experience and knowledge brokering on best practices / successful cases that facilitate value chain development.

Altogether, there were 64 participants including 22% female and 13 Dalits/Janjatis representing producer groups, cooperatives, traders, processors, agro-vets and service providers including projects /NGOs/ DCCI representatives in the workshops.

The following process is applied linking the value chain actors:

• Interaction between traders and producer organizations • Interaction betweeen Producer Organizations (POs) and business service providers (technical, credit, input suppliers etc) • Demand collection of agribusiness (product + volume + time + quality) • Supply estimation (product + Volume + time + quality) • Develop linkage between agribusiness and producer organization (who for whom, when, MSP how much volume) • Verbal contract between Agribusiness and POs

• Support o develop prodcution plan of the POs • Monitoring the POs production Mobilization • Mobilize the human resource to implement the PO’s plan

• Organize field visit for assurance of quality, product and volume and timing • Organize field visit to link Business Development Service (BDS) Contract • If agribusiness and POs are satisfied then initiation for formal contract Facilitation

• Contract done between agribusiness and POs for selling and buying of produces • Demand based production started Results • Supplied as per market demand • Institutional linkages for services (business, technical, insurance, finance, etc)

Figure 7: Process for B2B linkage among the value chain actors

Output 1.3: 13 Contract Facilitation Workshops Organized

A total of 13 Agribusiness-producers interaction meetings and contract facilitation events were conducted on off season vegetables, goat and apple value chains. The project staff facilitated the discussion among the agribusinesses and producer organizations on supply-demand status of the products, terms of trade, quality aspects and products sourcing areas during the programme. The interaction programme was instrumental in building trust and relationships besides exploring production and marketing opportunities among each other. The agribusinesses, cooperatives and project staff visited the production sites providing insights on the production potential and in-depth discussion on quality aspects, improving relationship and building trust among each other during the programme. In total, there were 595 participants of which 58% women and 29% Dalits /janajatis.

Commercial linkages are necessary for sustainable income generation. The project has initiated to support

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 17 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) commercial farming, but still need to build stronger partnerships, between producer organizations and traders for a sustainable and reliable supply and market access. The reliable supply and market access will provide incentives for increased investments by farmers, guaranteeing a sustainable production and income increase for farmers.

Output 1.4: Market Information Flow Continued

A regional information hub has also been established at CCI, surkhet to collect and disseminate the market information in last year and continued the collection, processing and dissemination of market price information during the reporting year too. 4 tools have been used in market information management: display board in market centers along the road corridors, voice mail, FM broadcasting and a web page. 3 tools out of the 4 have limited outreach to individual farmers: display board cover limited area, voice mail is costly and web pages are limited access to all. The project has tried to increase the coverage of the different tools by using it effectively. The project also trained data collectors in the project districts. Under the above mechanism, very low number of farmers increased their access in market information. Due to the low access of farmers in market information, SMS based Agriculture Market Information System (AMIS) is in operation in Surkhet by establishing a regional intormation hub. The project has applied the push system in SMS based market information system at the moment to increase the access of farmer in price information of the agriculture products of different market centers: national, regional and district level.

Output 1.5: 151 market arrangement between producer groups and traders facilitated by AEC and PMU in Seven value chains (total target-150)

The PMU and AEC teams facilitated 151 market arrangements between producer organizations and traders during the reporting year where the total target was 150. This target was made based on the target of 150 value chain window 2 groups/cooperatives. The no. of market agreements need to increase with the increasing no. of value chain window 2 groups/cooperatives. The no. of value chain window 2 groups/cooperatives reached to 366, so the project has still to facilitate the market arrangement with all 366 groups/cooperatives for buy back gurantee.

Output 1.6: 7 Re-assessments of Institutional Capacity of 7 Districts Chamber of Commerce and Industries (DCCIs) accomplished

The re-assessment of the institutional capacities of 7 Districts Chambers of Commerce and Industries (DCCIs): Achham, Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, , Salyan, and Surkhet were accomplished based on the 9 indicators during the reporting year too. The project facilitated the self-assessment event in each district. On an average, 46% increment has been seen in their capacities as compared to the baseline and 85% of the full marks of 180. The maximum score (171) obtained by Salyan district, increased by 87 marks (95% of full marks). Whereas, the lowest score (121) was obtained by Achham district, obtaining only 67% of the full marks. The detail marks obtained by CCIs is given in Table 16.

Page 18 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 16: Score obtained in institutional capacity self-assessment of DCCIs

Baseline Score After Increased or Increased or Full Achieved % CCIs Score Intervention Decreased Decreased Score on Target (2012) (2017) from Baseline Percent Achham 180 80 121 41 51 67 Dailekh 180 127 156 29 23 87 Jajarkot 180 101 157 56 55 87 Jumla 180 121 163 42 35 91 Kalikot 180 118 155 37 31 86 Salyan 180 84 171 87 104 95 Surkhet 180 103 149 46 45 83 Average 180 105 153 48 46 85

The CCIs: Dailekh, Jajarkot, Kalikot, Jumla, Salyan, and Surkhet have made good achievement from medium level to excellent in institutional capacity development. Achham CCI could only upgrade from medium to good category, being only one in this category. The CCIs have also made their three years strategies to develop their own institutional capacities which are expected to help in establishing linkages among the value chain actors. The project has also started to handover the Multi Stakeholders Platform (MSP) to CCIs institutionally for the sustainability of the MSPs at the district levels. The summary of self-evaluation of CCIs has been presented in Table 17.

Table 17: Self-evaluation of 7 CCIs and their level

Marks Level Level of CCIs before Intervention Level of CCIs after Intervention 45 Weak None None 46-90 Medium Achham and Salyan None Dailekh, Jajarkot, Jumla, Surkhet and 91-135 Good Achham Kalikot Dailekh, Jajarkot, Kalikot, Jumla, 136-180 Excellent None Salyan and Surkhet

PART TWO: SUPPORT TO VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

SUB-COMPONENT 1.1: FUND AND FACILITIES

The project has supported 72 co-investments during the reporting year through the different funds: value chain fund, sector development fund and inclusion fund. The maximum 30 was in Goat value chain followed by 29 in Off-season value chain. The project has invested NRs. 30.2 million as co-investments of which highest in the Off-season vegetable value chain (74 %), followed by Goat value chain (15%) and the least in Veg seed value chain (0.33%), no contracts made in Timur value chain.

The project has supported 682 co-investments till the reporting year through the different funds: value chain fund, sector development fund and inclusion fund. Value chain wise, the maximum 225 (33%) was in Off-season Vegetable value chain and minimum 19 (2.8%) in Vegetable seeds value chain. There were 9 sub-projects for business development services (BDS). The project has invested NRs. 658 million

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 19 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) as co-investments of which highest in the Off-season vegetable value chain (44 %), followed by Goat value chain (20%) and the least in timur value chain (3.6%). The detail number of sub-projects and co-investments are given in Tables 18 and 19. The detail list of sub-projects supported through different project’s funds is given in Annex D.

Table 18: Sub-projects and Investment by value chains during the Fiscal Year 2017/18

VCF W1 AB VCF W1 SP VCF W2 SIF SDF PIF Total Value NRs. NRs. NRs. NRs. NRs. NRs. NRs. Chains No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Million Million Million Million Million Million Million Apple 8 0.4 8 0.4 Ginger 1 2.0 1 2 Veg Seed 1 0.1 1 0.1 Goat 1 1.4 22 1.1 5 1.6 2 0.4 30 4.41 OSV 14 0.8 12 17.9 1 1.6 1 2.0 1 0.03 29 22.33 Turmeric 1 0.9 1 0.9 Timur 0 0 BDS 2 0.1 2 0.1 Total 2 2.3 47 2.5 17 19.5 2 3.6 1 2.0 1 2.0 72 30.2 Note: VCF: Value Chain Fund; AB: Agribusiiness, SP: Service Providers; PPF: Production and Post-harvest Support Fund; PIF: Poverty Inclusion Fund; SDF: Sector Development Fund; ARD: Action Research and Demonstration; SIF: Spatial Inclusion Fund

Table 19: Sub-projects and Investment (NRs million) by value chains till the Fiscal Year 2017/18

VCF W1 VCF W1 VCF W2 PPF SIF SDF PIF ARD Total Value AB SP Chains No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant No. Grant Apple 3 11.6 22 0.9 56 62.1 9 2.1 2 3.4 4 7.2 2 0.5 4 1.9 102 89.8 Ginger 4 11.5 1 0.1 44 37.7 0 0.0 1 2.0 0 0.0 3 0.7 2 0.9 55 53.0 Veg 1 9.2 1 0.1 14 13.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 1.0 19 24.3 Seed Goat 6 6.4 45 2.3 89 99.9 37 9.7 0 0.0 7 10.9 6 1.1 4 1.1 194 131.4 OSV 9 63.8 30 2.2 131 163.6 26 4.8 6 6.9 7 45.7 8 0.3 7 2.8 225 289.6 Turmeric 2 15.0 0 0.0 29 26.3 16 3.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.9 1 0.2 52 45.6 Timur 1 1.0 0 0.0 18 19.9 7 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.7 0 0.0 1 0.5 28 24.0 BDS 0 0.0 9 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.5 Total 26 118.5 108 6.1 381 423.4 95 20.8 9 12.4 19 65.4 23 3.5 22 8.4 682 658 Note: VCF: Value Chain Fund; AB: Agribusiiness, SP: Service Providers; PPF: Production and Post-harvest Support Fund; PIF: Poverty Inclusion Fund; SDF: Sector Development Fund; ARD: Action Research and Demonstration; SIF: Spatial Inclusion Fund

FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.1: VALUE CHAIN FUND (VCF):

Output 1.1.1.1: 72 business plans successfully implemented through VCF Window 1 and VCF Window 2 in 6 value chains.

2 business plans under VCF W1 (agribusinesses): marketing, inputs supply and service providers, 47 business plans under VCF W1 (private service providers): fee based technical service and business

Page 20 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 service, and 17 business plans under VCF W2 (producer organizations): irrigation infrastructures, storage buildings, cellar stores, machineries and tools, production and harvesting technologies, improved breeds, fodders, disease management and goat sheds were implemented during the Fiscal Year 2017/18 in different value chains. The detail name list of the sub-projects under VCF is given in Annex D.

The project co-invested NRs.24.4 million in 66 business plans under VCF W1 and W2 during the reporting period, which is 59% of the total investments (NRs. 41.3 million) in the business plans, the rest NRs. 19.9 million (41%) was invested by the grantees themselves.The details of the investments under VCF W1 and W2 by value chains are given in Table 20.

Table 20: No. of implemented business plans and cost by Value chain under different funds during reporting year

HVAP Grantee Grant VC/Funds Sub-projects Total Remarks Grant Fund Percent Value Chain Fund (VCF) Agribusiness Goat 1 1.4 3.3 4.8 60.7 Turmeric 1 0.9 0.9 1.9 39.3 Total 2 2.4 4.2 6.6 Percent 35.9 64.1 Value Chain Fund (VCF) W1 Private Service Providers Apple 8 0.4 0.4 0.8 16.2 Goat 22 1.1 4.5 5.5 42.8 OSV 14 0.8 0.8 1.6 31.8 Veg Seed 1 0.1 0.1 0.3 5.2 BDS 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 4.0 Total 47 2.5 6.0 8.5 100.0 Percent 29.3 70.7 Value Chain Fund (VCF) W2 Goat 5 2 1 3 11.2 OSV 12 18 5 23 88.8 Total 17 19.5 6.7 26.2 Percent 74.4 25.6 Poverty Inclusion Fund (PIF) Goat 2 0.4 - 0.4 92.4 OSV 1 0.03 - 0.03 7.6 Total 3 0.4 0.0 0.4 Sector Development Fund (SDF) OSV 1 2.0 2.3 4.3 46.5 Spatial Inclusion Fund (SIF) Ginger 1 2.00 0.33 2.33 55.1 OSV 1 1.63 0.29 1.92 44.9 Total 2 3.6 0.6 4.2 Percent 85.6 14.4 Grant Total 72 30.4 19.8 50.2 Percent 60.5 39.5

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 21 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 26 business plans under VCF W1 (agribusinesses): marketing, inputs supply and service providers, 108 business plans under VCF W1 (private service providers) and 381 business plans under VCF W2 (producer organizations) were implemented till the Fiscal Year 2017/18 in different value chains. The detail name list of the sub-projects under VCF is given in Annex D.

The project co-invested NRs. 548.6 million in 512 business plans under VCF W1 and W2 till the reporting period, which is 60% of the total investments (NRs. 912 million) in the business plans, the rest NRs. 365 million (40%) was invested by the grantees themselves.The details of the investments under VCF W1 and W2 by value chains are given in Table 21, 22 and 23.

Table 21: No. of implemented business plans and cost by Value chain under VCF W1 till reporting year

Value No. of Investment (NRs. In Million) Grant % Remarks Chains Sub-projects HVAP Grantee Total Apple Processing and 3 11.6 11.6 23.3 50.0 Trading Ginger Processing and 3 10.6 16.8 27.4 38.6 Marketing Goat Slaughtering and 6 6.4 10.6 17.0 37.7 Resource Farm OSV 9 63.8 82.0 145.8 44.0 Trading Timur Collecting and 1 1.0 2.8 3.8 25.4 Marketing Turmeric 3 15.9 29.2 45.1 35.3 Processing Veg Seed Processing and 1 9.2 9.2 18.5 50.0 Trading Total 26 118.6 162.3 280.9 42.2 Percent 42.2 57.8

Under the VCF W2, there were 17 sub-projects contracted with NRs. 19.5 million of commitment (74.4% of total project cost of NRs. 26.2 million) from the project during the reporting year. As such, the project has co-invested NRs. 421.6 million in 378 sub-projects under VCF W2 in 7 value chains, which accounted for 68.5% of the total investment (NRs. 615.5 million) till the reporting year. The project has co-invested in irrigation infrastructures, storage buildings, cellar stores, machineries and tools, production and harvesting technologies, improved breeds, fodders, disease management and goat sheds. HVAP investment is highest in off-season vegetable value chain (NRs. 162 million), followed by goat value chain (NRs. 99 million), and the least investment is in vegetable seeds value chain (NRs. 13.9 million) in total grant amount. The details are given in Table 22 and 23.

Table 22: No. of implemented business plans and investments by Value chain under VCF W2 during the reporting year

No. of Investment (NRs. In Million) Value Chains Grant % Sub-Project HVAP Grantee Total Goat 5 1.6 1.3 2.9 54.3 OSV 12 17.9 5.4 23.3 77.0 Total 17 19.5 6.7 26.2 74.4 Percent 74.4 25.6

Page 22 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 23: No. of implemented business plans and investments by Value chain under VCF W2 till the reporting year

No. of Sub- Investment (NRs. In Million) Value Chains Grant % Project HVAP Grantee Total Apple 56 62.1 29.2 91.3 68.0 Ginger 44 37.7 45.0 82.7 45.6 Goat 87 99.3 51.4 150.7 65.9 OSV 130 162.4 45.9 208.3 78.0 Timur 18 19.9 4.9 24.8 80.2 Turmeric 29 26.3 13.8 40.1 65.6 Veg Seed 14 13.9 3.7 17.6 79.2 Total 378 421.6 193.8 615.5 68.5 Percent 68.5 31.5

Output 1.1.1.2: NRs. 870 million values of products supplied to project supported agribusinesses.

13,357 producer households supplied 15,067 tons of agricultural products to supported agribusinesses directly and indirectly with a value of NRs. 870 million during the reporting year. So far, the sales volume is 91% of total production (16,573 MT) of the reporting year. Comparing the value chains, the off-season vegetable value chain contributed a value of NRs. 392 million (45% of total value), followed by the goat value chain with NRs. 268 million (31%), whereas the vegetable seeds value chain contributed the least (1%). Details are provided in Table 24.

Table 24: Value of supply by value chains in the reporting year

Value Percent Percent Value No. of Groups No. of No. of Volume (NRs in in Total in Total Chains and Cooperatives Farmers Agribusiness (MT) Million) Volume Value Apple 62 1850 3 1755 93 12 11 Ginger 44 1045 4 835 24 6 3 Goat 116 3428 5 913 268 6 31 OSV 141 3865 6 10172 392 68 45 Timur 21 1414 7 149 57 1 7 Turmeric 44 1383 8 1216 29 8 3 Veg Seed 14 372 9 27 7 1 1 Total 442 13,357 42 15067 870

Output 1.1.1.3: 3,279 infrastructures completed including 2,752 goat sheds

3,279 infrastructures were completed including 2,752 goat sheds till the reporting year. The project has completed 18 types of infrastructures in the project area through different project funds: VCF, SDF, PIF, SIF etc. Those infrastructures are supposed to increase the volume of production and value of agriculture production in each value chain. The details of the type and no. of infrastructures are given in Table 25.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 23 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Table 25: List of infrastructures developed till FY 2017/18

S.N. Name of Infrastructure No. of Infrastructure Capacity 1 Cemented Pond Irrigation System 214 604 ha Irrigation 2 Canal Irrigation System 42 3 Plastic Pond Irrigation System 161 4 Well 8 5 Lift Irrigation System 12 6 Collection Centre 16 193 MT 7 Seed Storage Building 3 484 MT 8 Cellar Storage Building 4 52 MT 9 Goat Shed (new and maintenance) 2752 42060 Goats 10 Dipping Tank 52 11 Suspension Bridge 1 66 MT 12 Gravity Ropeways 2 2115 MT 13 Truss Bridges 2 201 MT 14 Processing Units 4 15 SlaughterSlabs 2 16 Goat Collection Centers 2 17 Quarantine lab 1 18 Regional Livestock Lab 1 Total 3279

The productivity of the value chain commodities is increased due to the increase in irrigation of additional 604 hectare of land till the reporting year through the 437 irrigation infrastructures like cement ponds, plastic ponds, canals, lift pumps etc. Likewise, the volume of 52 tons apple stored in 4 cellar stores which helped to increase the price of apple after few months of storage.

Output 1.1.1.4: NRs. 185.5 million of additional amounts disbursed to Grantees

NRs. 185.5 million additional amounts disbursed to 632 grantees: agribusinesses and producer organizations, through different project funds during the reporting year. A total of NRs. 527.5 million was disbursed to 634 grantees, where the project had committed NRs 659.5 million to 634 grantees as a co-investment till the reporting year. This amount accounted for 80% of the total committed amount. The Vegetable Seed value chain has the highest percentage of disbursement (87%) followed by the timur value chain (81%) among the 7 value chains, whereas, off season vegetablevalue chain has the lowest disbursement (42%). The details of committed co-investments and disbursements are given in Table 26.

Page 24 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 26: Grants committed and disbursed amounts by value chains (Amount in NRs million) till the reporting period

Disbursed FY Grant (NRs. Cumulative Disbursed Value Chains 2017/18 (NRs. Disbursed % million) (NRs. million) Million) Apple 89.8 13.9 73.9 67 Ginger 53.0 10.2 43.2 70 Goat 131.4 39.8 113.8 60 OSV 290.9 113.1 220.1 42 Timur 24.0 2.1 21.1 81 Turmeric 45.6 3.9 31.9 66 Veg Seed 24.3 2.1 23.1 87 BDS 0.5 0.4 0.4 85 Total 659.5 185.5 527.5 80 Note: OSV-Off-season vegetable, BDS-business development service

FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.2: SECTOR DEVELOPMENT FUND (SDF)

The project facilitated to attract the public sector and invest under this fund for sector development in different value chains. Market development, collection centers, cold stores, certification, action research and demonstrations are the main investment activities under this fund. The project has implemented 14 co-investment supports in infrastructure till the reporting year. The detailed activities under SDF are explained in the following paragraph.

Output 1.1.2.1: One Co-investment implemented under SDF Infrastructure

The project has made one co-investment und SDF: market center in during the reporting year and invested NRs. 2 million. The cumulative number of investment under SDF reached to 19 till the reporting year with project’s committed investment of NRs. 65.4 million. The total no. of sub-projects and grant are given in Table 19 above.

The project has awarded to Bulbule Regional Agriculture Market Management Committee to support to complete the master plan of the Bulbule Regional Agriculture Produce Market Center during the reporting year. The total grant was NRs. 30 million. The most of the buildings were constructed during the reporting year.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 25 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) FUND AND FACILITIES 1.1.3: INCLUSION FUND

1.1.3.1: POVERTY INCLUSION FUND (PIF)

Output 1.1.3.1.1: 3 Farmers’ groups benefited through the PPF/PIF

During the reporting period, the project supported 3 production proposals and invested NRs. 0.4 million in Goat and OSV value chains as production and post-harvest support. Among these, 26 farmers from 3 different groups/cooperatives were benefited from the poverty inclusion fund during the reporting period, for which each farmer was provided with NRs. 15,000 as a grant to improve their enterprises.

Till the reporting period, the project has supported 117 production proposals and invested NRs 24.3 million in 6 value chains to improve production. The project used initially the production and post-harvest fund (PPF), which after project’s Mid-Term Review (MTR) changed to poverty inclusion fund (PIF), specifically focusing on the socially excluded groups and poor farmers. The project provided input materials (seed, sprayer, pesticides, fodder seed, and fertilizers), small irrigation facilities, goat sheds and improved breeds.The detailed no. of proposals and invested amounts are given in Table 27 and 28.

Table 27: No. of sub-projects and grants under PIF by value chains during FY 2017/18

Investment (NRs. In Million) Value Chains No. of Sub-Project HVAP Grantee Total Goat 2 0.4 0.4 OSV 1 0.03 0.0 Total 3 0.4 0.0 0.4

Table 28: Cumulative No. of sub-projects and grants under PPF/PIF by value chains till FY 2017/18

No. of Investment (NRs. In Million) Percent of Value Chains Sub-Project HVAP Grantee Total grant Apple 11 3 0 2.6 11 Ginger 3 1 0 0.7 3 Goat 43 11 0 10.7 44 OSV 33 5 0 5.1 21 Timur 7 1 0 1.0 4 Turmeric 20 4 0 4.2 17 Total 117 24.3 0.0 24.3 100

Output 1.1.3.1.2: 1,269 additional producers received the improved production and processing technologies (total target-9,450).

1,269 producers have increased access to improved production and processing technologies under the poverty inclusion fund/production and post-harvest support fund during the reporting year. Till the reporting period, 15,965 producers have increased access to improved production and processing technologies. The project supported seeds (for additional farm land), plastic houses, irrigation, and other production

Page 26 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 tools to scale up production in the respective value chains. Most of the producers’ organizations have submitted the proposal for VCF W2 fund so the project was unable to cover the targeted producers from the PIF/PPF fund.

Output 1.1.3.1.3: 52 farmers trained in production and technology use (total target-2,500).

A total of 52 farmers were trained in post-production and technology use during the reporting period by organizing 3 training events where 72% and 25% of the participants were from women and Daltis & Janajatis respectively. A total of 6,228 farmers were trained in different technical trainings on crop and livestock production, post- harvest management and technology use as against the target of 2500 till the reporting year. Among them 57% and 31% of the participants were from women and Daltis & Janajatis respectively. The participation of women in thesetrainings was less than that of target of 60 Picture 1: Plastic tunnel house training, Salyan percent. The detail number of participants in different technical trainings by gender and caste/ethnicity is given in Table 29.

During the training the participants gained the following knowledge: l Knowledge on the general principles and practices of sustainable harvesting: the technique of identifying the maturity of Timur, sustainable harvesting measures and post-harvesting technology. Additional skills in grading cum sorting, packaging, storage and other post-harvest handling practices. Marketing knowledge in labeling before trading, and the significance of samples for trading purpose. Picture 2: A vegetable field, Rawatgaon, Jajarkot l Well acquainted with post-harvest management of ginger and turmeric crops. Exposure to recent practices, techniques and innovations in post- harvest management of ginger and turmeric. The service providers/lead farmers gained the knowledge to make low cost seed storage of ginger and turmeric. l Enhanced apple orchard soil management practices, pruning of apple trees, disease and pest management practices. The nursery growers, lead farmers, service providers, agro-vets owners could develop their capacities on business plan development, marketing, community mobilization etc during the post harvest and management training. l The training enhanced the knowledge of goat rearing farmers on fodder cultivation, disease control

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 27 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) and shed management. Likewise, the VAHWs refreshed their knowledge to provide the services in their communities. The VAHWs also gained the knowledge about fee based services and scaling up of their enterprises. l The off-seasonal vegetable growing farmers gained the following knowledge during farm based theoretical and practical training;

v Visualized to adopt technologies such as seasonal technique of vegetable nursery raising and bed solarisation, nutrition of vegetables, growing vegetables under plastic house/ tunnel, knowing the technological packages of off-season vegetable production of Cole crops (cauliflower, cabbage), Cucurbits (bitter gourd, squash, cucumber, bottle gourd), Solanaceous (tomato, chilli and brinjal), leguminous (pea, bean and cowpea) and broad leaf mustard vegetables, Identifying and managing the major insect pests and diseases of vegetable crops.

v Farmers are self-encouraged and motivated to participate on such HVAP field levels training program to learn more about on problem based situation.

v Farmers knew the age of seedling to be planted, depth of planting, crop geometry, irrigation, mulching, manuring time and the information on source of manure for good yield of vegetables were the major learning from these practical based trainings.

v The skill of participants on soil, nutrition and water management and plant protection aspects enhanced.

v Farmers also gained the knowledge on about cost benefit analyses of vegetable farming and comparative benefits of cereal corps and vegetable crops.

v Lead farmers/service providers were fostered their capacities on technologies: tunnel house, plastic mulching, drip irrigation etc. The service providers/lead farmers also knew on about post harvest handling practices, disease control, marketing strategy etc.

Due to the increased knowledge, the farmers started the following practices in their enterprises: l Apple VC: increased number of plants, managed the orchard (pruning, using Bordeaux paste, irrigation, fertilization), sustainable harvesting and grading for good price, product diversified (dry slices, juice, jam etc); Picture 3: Carrot seed production field, Jumla l Goat VC: increased number of fodder plants, breed managed, improved in goat shed, practiced goat culling, used weighing machine etc. l Ginger VC: practiced organic farming, replaced the traditional practices in farming, built low cost

Page 28 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 storage at farm house for quality seed management, linked with agribusinesses for sustainable marketing, agribusiness partnership increased in production too etc. l OSV VC: increased tunnel houses for scaling up off-season vegetable production, increased collective marketing, used good post harvest practices, linked with agribusinesses for sustainable marketing, increased in production of market led vegetables, improved relations with agribusinesses etc. l Timur: tools used for proper harvesting, managed the plants (pruning, irrigation, fertilization etc.) for quality production, timely harvesting, grading practices applied for good price, improved relations with agribusinesses etc. l Turmeric VC: practiced organic farming, replaced the traditional practices in farming, built low cost storage at farm house for quality seed management, linked with agribusinesses for sustainable marketing etc.

Table 29: No. of participants in technical trainings by gender and caste/ethnicity

No. of Trainings and Participants during FY 2017/18 No. of Participants Training Heads No. of Trainings DF DT JF JT OCF OCT TF GT Crop Production 2 2 2 7 9 29 43 38 54 Livestock Production 0 0 Post Harvest Handling 0 0 Technology Use 1 1 2 3 4 10 12 14 18 Total 3 3 4 10 13 39 55 52 72 Percent 6 19 75 72 No. of Trainings and Participants Till FY 2017/18 No. of Participants Training Heads No. of Trainings DF DT JF JT OCF OCT TF GT Crop Production 111 221 329 232 354 1531 2582 1984 3265 Livestock Production 44 219 278 106 153 435 778 760 1209 Post Harvest Handling 44 132 233 176 336 457 1033 765 1602 Technology Use 8 4 14 19 45 24 93 47 152 Total 207 576 854 533 888 2447 4486 3556 6228 Percent 16 15 69 57 Note: DF: Dalit Female; DT: Dalit Total; JF: Janajati Female; JT: Janajati Total; OCF: Other Caste Female; OCT: Other Caste Total; TF: Total Female; GT: Grand Total

1.1.3.2: SPATIAL INCLUSION FUND (SIF)

Output 1.1.3.2.1: 2 Co-investments in Spatial Inclusion infrastructure (total target-50)

Two co-investments were done through spatial inclusion fund during the reporting period. A total of NRs. 3.6 million matching grant was committed to grantee for constructing truss bridge and culvert for transporting agriculture produces in Jajarkot and Salyan districts. The project has implemented 9

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 29 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) sub-projects in apple (2), ginger (1) and off-season vegetable (6) value chains till the reporting period. The project has provided grant support of NRs. 12.4 million. The detail no. of sub-projects is given in Table 18 & 19 and the detail name of sub-projects is given in Annex D.

SUB-COMPONENT 1.2: GROUP FORMATION AND STRENGTHENING

Output 1.2.1: 17 additional groups and cooperatives strengthened (total target-500)

17 groups (15) and cooperatives (2) were strengthened by the project during the reporting year. Till the reporting year, the project has strengthened 456 groups and cooperatives of which 320 are groups and 136 cooperatives, which is 71% of the total project target (500). The project strengthened the institutional capacities of groups and cooperatives to implement investments activities in production and marketing. The total number of members of the 456 groups and cooperatives is 15,965 of which 63% are women. Likewise, 16.5 percent and 14.6 percent of the members are from the Dalit and Janjatis castes respectively. The number of the groups/cooperatives and theirmembership supported from the project is given in Table 30.

Table 30: No. of project supported groups/cooperatives and members

Achieved Achieved Total Project Till Last during the FY Percent year 2017/18 Target Achieved Achieved % No. of Groups 305 15 270 320 119 No. of Cooperatives 134 2 230 136 59 Total Groups and Cooperatives 463 17 500 456 91 Female Members 9701 415 8100 10116 125 63 Male Members 5616 233 5400 5849 108 37 Total Members 15317 648 13500 15965 118 Dalit 2579 58 1688 2637 156 16.5 Janjati 2214 118 1688 2332 138 14.6 Other Caste 10524 472 10124 10996 109 68.9 Total Members 15317 648 13500 15965 118 118

Output 1.2.2: 202 Value Chain groups/cooperatives assessed institutional capacities

The project has facilitated in self-assessment of the capacities of 202 groups and cooperatives during the reporting period. The project has applied spider web tool with 9 major indicators. The project needs to increase such facilitations, as the number of value chain groups/cooperatives is increasing in each year. The project has also supported to these assessed groups and cooperatives in developing their institutional capacity enhancement plans. This ‘capacity assessment tool’ is applied at the end of each year to determine the institutional capacity of the producers’ organizations and will be the basis for a capacity enhancement action plan for the necessary improvements. Based on the improvement plan, the project is mobilizing the groups/cooperatives to enhance their capacities.

Before the invervention 86.6 percent producers’ organizations fell in poor and very poor categories where 13.3 percent POs fell in satisfactory level. After the project intervention, the 60.9% producers’ organization fall in satisfactory and excellent level where only 39.1% producers’ organizations fall in poor catetory. The project

Page 30 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 has supported on their graduation plan and improved the institutional capacity of the 456 producers’ organizations during the project period. The ranking level and their percentage of producers’ organizations (POs) are given in Table 31. An example of institutional capacity of one PO is given in Figure 8.

Table 31: Percentage of Producers’ Organizations and their ranking level (as of July 2018) Percentage of Producer’s Percentage of Producer’s Ranking Level Marks of Level Organization (before Organization (after project intervention) project intervention) Outstanding Over 90 0 0 Excellent 80-89 0 5.0 Satisfactory 60-79 13.3 55.9 Poor 50-59 29.2 19.3 Very Poor Under 49 57.4 19.8

Institutional Capacity Self-Assessment Score of Malchari Multiple Co-operative Ltd., Surkhet

Figure 8: Spider web of Malchari Multiple Cooperative Ltd., Surkhet (an example)

Output 1.2.3: 57 additional groups and cooperatives managing production and post-harvest facilities and equipments

57 additional groups and cooperatives have accessed production and post-harvest facilities like irrigation, cellar stores, seed stores, collection centers and mini-tractors during the reporting year. The total number of groups/cooperatives reached to 456 till the reporting year.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 31 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Output 1.2.6: 2,695 People trained in Social Mobilization.

Social mobilization is a major task of the district based units have been working in 7 project districts, one in each district. The LNGOs earlier facilitated the groups and cooperatives to implement their business plans and proposals. The project trained 2,695 farmers during the reporting period in account keeping, record management, group management, institutional capacity self-assessment, well being ranking and enterprise development, of which 85% were women. The total no. of trained people in social mobilization aspect reached to 45,883 till the reporting year, where women participation was 69 percent till the reporting year.

The participants learnt about record keeping (production, sales, cost of production), account keeping (income and expenditure of group and cooperative), group management (group values, group dynamics, savings and credit), and enterprise development (enterprise selection, production, marketing, profit and loss etc.).The individual farmers have maintained their production and plan data in their own farmer’s diaries. The groups/cooperatives have developed their institutional capacity development plans and implemented. More detail of the participants participated on social mobilization training is provided in Table 32.

Table 32: No. of participants in different trainings by caste/ethnicity

No. of Trainings and Participants during the FY 2017/18 No. of Participants Training Heads No. of Trainings DF DT JF JT OCF OCT TF GT Business Literacy 90 330 337 224 226 1531 1570 2085 2133 Social Mobilization 11 43 53 27 38 110 443 180 534 Exposure Visit 1 4 6 2 2 17 20 23 28 Total 102 377 396 253 266 1658 2033 2288 2695 Percent 16 11 72 85 No. of Trainings and Participants Till FY 2017/18 No. of Participants Training Heads No. of Trainings DF DT JF JT OCF OCT TF GT Business Literacy 342 1489 1520 1050 1054 5904 6043 8443 8617 Gender and Social 268 969 1295 692 1067 3438 5288 5099 7650 Inclusion Social Mobilization 995 3185 4865 2519 3983 12340 20431 18044 29279 Exposure Visit 13 16 31 26 31 137 275 179 337 Total 1618 5659 7711 4287 6135 21819 32037 31765 45883 Percent 18 13 69 69 Note: DF-Dalit Female, DT-Dalit Total, JF-Janjati Female, JT-Janjati Total, OCF-Other Caste Female, OCT-Other Caste Total, TF-Total Female and GT-Grand Total

Page 32 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 SUB-COMPONENT 1.3: GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION

Output 1.3.1: 1,145 poor HHs participated in the project (proportionally to their presence in the project region) disaggregated by caste/ethnicity, poverty and value chain (total target-8,910).

The project ranked households at four poverty levels: extreme poor, moderately poor, near poor and non-poor, based on their well-being (land, food security, production, income etc.) in 3 value chains: apple, off-season vegetable and goat during the reporting period. 1,145 households out of 1,269 households were ranked as poor households, accounting for 90.2% of the total ranked households. Till the reporting year, the project has been able to include 14,400 poor households, out of 15,965 HHs, and supported them, exceeding the total target of 8,910 poor households.

Analyzing the poverty status of the benefitted households in all value chains till the reporting year, the highest numbers of households fall in moderately poverty levels (43.8%) followed by extreme poor (26.2%) and then near poor category (20.3%). Only 9.8% of the households are at non-poor level.The project has been applying the well-being ranking tool within the communities to disaggregate them by poverty levels and support them accordingly. The details are provided in Table 33 and Figure 9.

Table 33: Poverty ranking of beneficiary households by value chain and poverty category till the reporting period

Extreme Poor HHs Moderately Poor HHs Near Poor Non-Poor % % HHs % HHs % Apple 23.2 52.4 22.6 1.7 Ginger 26.6 43.4 19.5 10.5 Goat 25.9 40.9 22.7 10.5 OSV 23.3 37.3 24.1 15.3 Timur 36.0 51.6 9.1 3.3 Turmeric 24.1 43.5 20.9 11.4 Veg Seed 27.3 52.4 8.9 11.3 Total 26.2 43.8 20.3 9.8 Note: Extreme poor (landless, less than one dollar per day income, less than 3 months of food security period), Moderately poor (few land, no regular income, less than one dollar per day income, less than 6 months of food security period) Near poor (less than 10 ropanis land, more than one dollar income per day, more than 6 months and less food security period) Non- Poor (more than 10 ropanis land, more than one dollar income per day, 12 months of food security period, regular income)

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 33 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Figure 9: Distribution of beneficiary households by Value Chain with poverty ranking as of 15 July, 2018

Output 1.3.2: 2,133 People attending Business literacy and numeracy classes disaggregated by gender, caste/ethnicity, and poverty (total target-2,500).

A total of 2,133 people (98% women and 15.8 % Dalits and 10.6 % Janajatis) participated in Business Literacy Classes (BLC) conducted in 90 producer groups and cooperatives in 7 value chains during the reporting year.Till the reporting year, a total of 8,617 people (98% women and 18 % Dalits and 12 % Janajatis) were trained in Business Literacy and Numeracy Classes (BLC). 83% women members from the POs out of 10,116, participated in the BLC. Likewise, 54% POs members out of 15,965 participated in the BLC. Picture 4: BLC Participants, Kalikot The project trained 88 BLC facilitators by organizing three TOTs during the reporting year for the facilitation of BLC at the group and cooperative levels. A 6 days ToT organized to make familiar on BLC resource materials: Value chain development and commercial farming; social mobilization and institutional development; and entrepreneurship development and marketing. After TOT, the facilitators were assigned to facilitate the BLC Picture 5: BLC TOT Participants, Surkhet in the communities.

Page 34 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 The BLC covers social empowerment, governance, gender and social inclusion and calculations, entrepreneurship, commercialization and marketing. BLC has been designed for post-literates; however there were high numbers of illiterates found among the women who participated. The participants are reflecting the following as major outputs of the training: l Understand business plan and profit & loss; l Understand mathematical calculation related to their business plans; l Building joint efforts for economic and social change; l Women empowerment on business aspects and social rights.

The project has also made strategy to develop local champions in different areas like business awareness, social mobilization, advocacy, monitoring etc that they can change their communities by themselves and leading for sustainable rural economic growth. In this line, the project had trained 32 BLC facilitators as the marketing and service providers and deploying them in their respective group/cooperatives providing 50% cost as grant from the project.

Output 1.3.3: 49 percent women leadership positions held within producer groups and cooperatives by caste/ethnicity (total target-1,000)

980 women are in leading positions out of 1,824 positions of the 456 groups/cooperatives. 31% of POs are led (chair-person) by women. Likewise 59% of vice-chairperson, 69% of treasurers and 38% of secretary positions are held by women in their groups/cooperatives. This result showed that women’s decision making within groups and cooperives have increased. The detail number of women in key positions is given in Table 6.

Output 1.3.4: 63% women participated and benefitted from the project (focus on the new groups) disaggregated by caste/ethnicity (total target-60%).

10,116 (63%) women are actively participating in groups and cooperatives till the reporting period where the total numbers of members are 15,965. The project has achieved the total target of 60 percent women participation till the reporting period. The detail is presented in Table 30.

Output 1.3.5: 4969 (31%) Dalits, Janajatis and other minorities participated and benefitted from the project (total target 25%).

4,969 (31%) Dalits and Janajatis are actively participating in groups and cooperatives till the reporting period, out of the total number of members (15,965) as against the target of 25%. The details are presented in Table 30.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 35 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 2. SERVICE MARKET STRENGTHENING

The project has focused on the service market strengthening as one of the major elements for enterprise development that helps to scale up commercial agriculture production to contribute to the rural economy. As such, the project has implemented activities to strengthen and mobilize the service providers that may be public and private at local level to provide the services to the communities. The sub-components wise accomplished activities and its outpus are explained below.

SUB-COMPONENT 2.1: MOBILIZATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING OF SERVICE PROVIDERS

The project has carried out many activities to increase the capacity of service providers: government, private service providers and district chamber of commerce and industries thereby to provide their services at the community levels. The following activities were accomplished during the reporting year under this sub-component:

Output 2.1.1.1: 140 Public Service Providers Trained

A total of 6 capacity building events: training and exposure visits were organized during the reporting period in different area to build the capacity of the public service providers/government officials. 140 government officials: field technicians and agriculture officers participated in the events where there were only 38 women participants (27%) participated. The detail of training and participants is given in Table 34.

The training events were facilitated by the HVAP in coordination with Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, IWRMP, and Plant Protection Directorate of Department of Agriculture. The Agriculture Development Strategy (ADS) is a 20 year long policy document implemented by the Government of Nepal for the development of agricultural sector in Nepal. The objective of the training was to orient and capacitate to technical staff about the characteristics and provisions of ADS so that they will plan, implement and deliver the services as per ADS. Similarly, one event of three days long “Off-season Vegetable Plant Protection” was conducted and capacitated to technical staff of DADOs in coordination with Plant Protection Directorate, Lalitpur and HVAP as off-season vegetable is one of the major value chains of HVAP.

A week long study visit on value chain financing & agricultural insurance was organized in Thailand and Philippines. Seventeen line agencies staff visited, observed and learned best practices on value chain financing & agricultural insurance services of Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, Value Chain Development of Dairy Cooperative, Agriculture Marketing Cooperative and Organic Vegetables in Thailand. Similarly, they visited, observed and learned about the policies and programs of Agriculture Credit Policy Council, Land Bank of the Philippines, Philippine Agricultural Insurance Corporation; and value chain financing and agricultural insurance services provided by the micro-finance institutions in the Philippines. The participants were capacitated in value chain financing and agricultural insurance implemented and they are expected to apply the learned skills, knowledge and best practices on value chain financing & agricultural insurance by linking financial institutions and insurance companies with value chain actors in their working areas.

Page 36 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 34: No. of Trainings and Participants of Capacity Building Trainings

No. of No. of Participants Trainings Events DF DT JF JT OC F OCT FT GT Orientation on Agriculture Development 1 1 3 2 6 10 35 13 44 Strategy Orientation on Value chain finance and 1 0 0 0 0 2 17 2 17 insurance Plant protection 1 0 0 0 4 5 20 5 24 Foreign study visit on agri 1 0 0 0 2 1 10 1 12 entrepreneurship Foreign study visit on value chain 1 0 0 0 2 1 10 1 12 financing Incountry study tour 1 2 3 1 1 13 27 16 31 Total 6 3 6 3 15 32 119 38 140 Percent 4.3 10.7 85.0 27.1 Note: DF-Dalit Female, DT-Dalit Total, JF-Janjati Female, JT-Janjati Total, OCF-Other Caste Female, OCT-Other Caste Total, TF-Total Female and GT-Grand Total

2.1.2 Capacity Building of District Chambers of Commerce and Industries (DCCIs) and Mobilization

Output 2.1.2.1: 1 Chamber Management and Planning Training Organized to DCCI Members/ trade fair management training to DCCIs

A three days chamber management and planning training organized to CCIs members during the reporting year. During the training, the participants gained the knowledge on motivation, chamber management, conflict management, leadership development etc. The SWOT tool was used to analyze the strength and weakness and to identify the opportunities and threats of each CCIs. Altogether 24 CCIs members participated in the training of which two participants were women.

Output 2.1.2.2: 16 B2B Linkage Workshops Organized

Sixteen B2B linkage workshops organized in HVAP program districts during the reporting year. During the workshop, the participants discussed on about the district level agribusiness, collection centers, linkage between producers’ organizations and agribusinesses, linkage between inputs/service providers and producers’ organizations etc. Altogether, 694 participants from different groups/cooperatives, line agencies, agribusinesses, service providers, members of CCIs participated in the workshops. Out of 694 participants, 53 percent participants were women and 30 percent from Dalit and Janjatis.

Output 2.1.2.3: One Refresher Training organized to data collectors

One refresher training was organized on data collection, and Agriculture Market Information System (AMIS) operation and dissemination in Surkhet. Executive members of CCIs, CCIs staff and project staff participated in the training. Participants were oriented on farm gate price, wholesale and retail price and methods/procedure for data collection for the uniformity and to meet the standards system.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 37 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Output 2.1.2.4: One Policy Dialogue Interaction Program Organized

Province level policy dialogue interaction program was held in Province FNCCI building, Surkhet. CCIs executive members and staff were the participants of the program. Short presentation were made for the conceptualization and framing of the issues to be documented. The CCIs of program districts presented their local/district level policy issues separately. The presented issues are given in Table 35.

Table 35: Value chain functions policy issues

Collection and Input supply Production Trading Import/export processing Local germplasm of Maximum use of Inadequate lab seed should be pesticide for facilities at border preserved and commercial Market structures not custom office site different commercial production causing functioning properly makes difficult to seed should be grow negative effect on sell the vegetable in local context human health produce to India Continuation of Illegally live goat and subsidy for promoting No practice of grading Multiple taxation Vegetable produce chicken enters from commercial and no identity of local should be paid without any hurdles India production to produce in the market to each district coming from India compete with India Challenges for Challenge facing due Government Low volume of Vegetables seed organic production to duplication of the procedure is lengthy produce getting preferred by farmers limits commercial program in the same for the establishment of difficulty for are not registered. production for area processing industry marketing export Insurance company does not want to do Need of branding of insurance for boer the local production goat as per purchase price

2.1.3 Mobilization and Capacity Building of Private Service Providers

Output 2.1.3.1: 8 Refresher Training Events Organized for Capacity Building of Private Service Providers

A total of 8 capacity building/ training events were organized and conducted in FY 2017/18 and capacitated to private service providers, local resource persons, Agro-vets/Para-vets of project districts: Jumla, Kalikot, Achham, Dailekh, Surkhet, Salyan and Jajarkot. The total 303 private service providers (32% women) were participated in the training events and capacitated on Agriculture Development Strategy (ADS) Orientation, Off-season Vegetable Plant Protection, Soil Testing & Management, Crop & Livestock Insurance Agent Basic Training, Pesticide Retailers’ Training, Seed Production & Management Orientation Training and Veterinary Laboratory Technology Training. Participants became able to provide fee-based technical services with upgraded skills and knowledge in plant protection of off-season vegetables; soil testing; diagnosis & treatment of parasites of goat; input supply (seeds, pesticides and other agricultural inputs) services and crop & livestock insurance services. Participants gained skills, knowledge and practices from different types of capacity building trainings and they are able to establish agro-vet centers and provide diversified services which will lead to accessible and sustainable private services .

Page 38 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Table 36: No.of Trainings and Participants of Capacity Building Trainings to Private Service Providers in FY 2017/18

No. of No. of Participants Trainings Events DF DT JF JT OC F OCT FT GT Orientation on Agriculture Strategy 1 1 1 4 8 5 24 10 33 Plant protection 2 2 5 3 10 18 43 23 58 Soil testing 1 1 3 1 7 5 26 7 36 Seed production and management 1 1 3 1 4 10 32 12 39 Crop and Livestock insurance 1 2 3 1 3 8 24 11 30 Vetenery and lab training to agro-/para vet 1 1 2 0 3 2 22 3 27 Pesticides retailing training to PSP 1 1 1 0 2 10 27 11 30 Interaction on PSP and POs 3 8 17 9 25 34 107 51 149 Incountry Exposure visit 1 2 2 0 3 6 23 8 28 Total 8 15 28 11 40 70 235 96 303 Percent 9.2 13.2 77.6 31.7 Note: DF-Dalit Female, DT-Dalit Total, JF-Janjati Female, JT-Janjati Total, OCF-Other Caste Female, OCT-Other Caste Total, TF-Total Female and GT-Grand Total

Output 2.1.3.2: 108 Private Service Providers Mobilized

A total of 193 private service providers strengthened/developed and mobilized in HVAP area to provide the services to the farmers at community level till the reporting period. Out of 193, 108 private service providers received the grant amount of NRs. 6.1 million from HVAP till the reporting year.

The grant recipient service providers have been operating their businesses by opening service centre/ office at the community level. The service providers who are not receiving the project’s grant, they are also providing the services to the farmers. The highest number of the service providers (42%) was mobilized in goat value chain followed by OSV value chain (28%). There is no any service providers so far developed in timur and turmeric value chains. The detail number of service providers is given in Table 37.

Table 37: No. of private service providers (PSP) strengthened/developed and mobilized till the reporting period

No. of Service Percent of HVAP Grant Percent of S.N. Value chains/BDS Providers PSP (NRs. 000) Grant 1 Apple 22 20 911.1 15 2 Ginger 1 1 138.9 2 3 Goat 45 42 2322.0 38 4 Off-season Vegetable 30 28 2163.0 35 5 Vegetable Seed 1 1 128.9 2 6 Business Development Service 9 8 450.0 7 (BDS) Total 108 6113.9

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 39 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) After agreement with HVAP, the service providers organized orientation programs in their communities to orient the farmers about the fee based services. Most of the service providers have provided their services at community level by agreeing with members of the group/cooperative on the services and fees. The project also has made plan to develop and mobilize the government service centers by developing their capacities and linking private service providers within the periphery of the service centers. In this connection, the project has piloted two places: one in Service Center () for agriculture and livestock; and Khadgawada of Dailekh for livestock only.The collection centers and office buildings were constructed and renovated during the reporting year for the purpose. The pheriphery farmers were benefited from the newly established service center model.

Output 2.1.3.3: NRs 18.8 million equivalent Services provided to 13,577 farmers through Private Service Providers (VAHWs/VAWs/ JTAs/ BDS/LRPs)

A total of 108 trained private service providers were mobilized with project’s co-financing for business development and technical services in seven project districts. These private service providers sold their busness development and technical services to 13,577 farmers worth of NRs. 18.8 million. The detail of services provided by the private service providers in FY 2017/18 is given in Table 38.

Table 38: District wise service provided by private service providers to farmers

Service provided Service sold by Private Service Providers No. of Private District to No. of and purchased by producer farmers Worth Service Providers Farmers in NRs. Surkhet 26 3591 29,23,000 Dailekh 14 3240 53,05,000 Jumla 14 1227 22,55,000 Kalikot 26 1444 34,26,405 Salyan 11 2517 23,20,000 Jajarkot 8 348 10,50,750 Achham 9 1210 16,02,000 Total 108 13,577 1,88, 82,155

SUB-COMPONENT 2.2: PARTNERSHIP AND FINANCIAL SERVICES

In overall co-investment allocation, through VCF Window 1 and 2, the project has attempted in increasing contribution of Producers’ Organizations’ (POs) own contributions over the time span of the business plan, making sure that additional private or commercial financial resources are tapped as per their demand. Some of the financial institutions participated in the Value Chain Finance (VCFn) and Agricultural Insurance (AI) and Service to Service linkage interactions of different value chains with the project facilitating linkages between the producer organizations and financial institutions to increase the access to financial products and consequently scaling up value chain investments. During the VCFn& AI orientation interactions, the financial institutions shared their financial products to the participants-the farmers. After having interactions on VC Finance & AI and service to service linkages some of the banks and financial institutions have already joined in partnership in financial services with HVAP beneficiary grantees.

Page 40 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Output 2.2.1: 12 Interaction and Orientation Events on VC finance and Insurance Organized

Twelve interaction and orientation events were organized during the reporting year in project districts on about value chain finance and insurance. A total of 571 participants participated in the interaction programs, where 38% participants were women. The detail no. of participants is given in Table 39.

The project oriented to stakeholders: service providers (public and private), beneficiaries, and farmers about the value chain finance, crop and livestock insurance, value chain and inclusive business, linkage among the value chain actors, service providing mechanism/model, business model of service etc. The insurance companies and micro-finance institutions oriented the participants on their financial products: credit and insurance and procedures to access the products. The participants from the groups/ cooperatives have shown their interests for insurance to reduce the risk in production. The interaction program has also made plan for cluster level orientation and launch of insurance and credit activities at community level.

Table 39: No. of Events and Participants on VC Finance and Agricultural Insurance

No. of No. of Participants Trainings Events DF DT JF JT OC F OCT FT GT Orientation on Value chain finance and insurance 6 11 25 36 83 65 207 112 315 S2S interaction 6 10 20 29 62 64 174 103 256 Total 12 21 45 65 145 129 381 215 571 Percent 7.9 25.4 66.7 37.7 Note: DF-Dalit Female, DT-Dalit Total, JF-Janjati Female, JT-Janjati Total, OCF-Other Caste Female, OCT-Other Caste Total, TF-Total Female and GT-Grand Total

Output 2.2.2.: NRs 139 million loan provided to 5,386 farmers

A total of 5,386 farmers from different value chains producers’ organizations in six project districts have increased the access in additional loan from the 36 Micro-Finance Institutions (MFIs) during the reporting year. A toal of NRs. 139 million loans were provided to 5,386 farmers during the reporting period. The detail no. of farmers and loan amount is given in Table 40.

HVAP has made partnership in accessing the financial services for producer farmers with Agricultural Development Bank Ltd, Prabhu Bank, Nirdhan Utthan BanK Limited, Deprosc Micro-Finance Development Bank, Chhimek Micro-Finance Development Bank, Swabalamban Micro-Finance Development Bank, National Cooperative Bank Ltd, NIC ASIA Micro-Finance Bank, Kisan Micro-Finance Company, Mahila Sahayatra Salyan, Batawaran Sudhar Multi-purpose Cooperative Ltd, Bauddha Gramin Multi-purpose Cooperative Ltd, Himchuli Agricultural Cooperative Ltd Kalikot, Chhandannath Agricultural Cooperative Ltd Jumla, Gothpada Agricultural Cooperative Ltd Dailekh and Kasturi Multi-purpose Cooperative Ltd Jajarkot.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 41 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Table 40: The no. farmers and amount of loan provided during the reporting period

Additional Loan Provided No. of Farmers (Project District No. of MFIs (NRs. Million) Beneficiaries) Dailekh 5 39.6 981 Jajarkot 7 6 189 Jumla 5 25.4 778 Kalikot 6 16.42 436 Salyan 5 5.27 192 Surkhet 8 46.4 2810 Total 36 139.09 5386

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT (Including M&E and KM):

Output 3.1: Impact Survey Carried out

The impact assessment of the HVAP was carried out in FY 2017/18 and it was led by a team of researchers from IFAD where a data collection service was led by the Lattanzio Monitoring and Evaluation based in Italy. The Lattanzio hired a local service provider, Full Bright Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., to collect data for the impact assessment. The project (HVAP) also coordinated and facilitated the IFAD team and local service providers to carry out the field survey in the seven project districts. The local service provider mobilized a team of 35 enumerators to conduct both quantitative and qualitative surveys in the project and control communities chosen randomly. HVAP project, in coordination with Research and Impact Assessment (RIA) Division of the IFAD mobilized five independent field supervisors to monitor the data collection team and households for quality assurance by conducting interviews on approximately 10% of the households already interviewed by the data collection service provider. In total, 3000 households were surveyed from 234 producer organizations (POs) across seven districts. The final report of the impact survey would be received from the RIA/IFAD by January, 2019.

Output 3.2: 3 PSC and 3 PCCG meetings Organized (Target 3 PSC/3 PCCG Meetings)

The project organized 3 Project Consultative and Coordination Group (PCCG) meetings and 3 Project Steering Committee (PSC) meetings during the reporting year. The meetings have given guidance and strategic directions for smooth implementation of the project. During the meetings, the members discussed on about the results of the project during the trimesters as well as cumulative since the start of the project.

Page 42 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 The following major decisions were made during the PSC and PCCG meetings: • The PSC guided to project to complete the sub-projects in given time; • The PSC directed to the project to focus on sustainability of achieved results; • The meetings directed to share the project learning and experience to stakeholders widely; • The meetings guided to the project to Picture 6: PSC Meeting, Kathmandu link between phasing out project (HVAP) and new coming project (ASDP) for upscaling.

Output 3.3: One AWPB and 3 progress reports submitted

The project has submitted annual work plan and budget (AWPB) of the coming fiscal year 2018/19 to MoAD and IFAD as a regular work. During the reporting period, the project submitted one AWPB and 3 (1 annual and 2 trimester) progress reports to MoAD and IFAD. In total 7 AWPBs have already been implemented by the project.

Output 3.4: Knowledge Products Developed and Shared

The project produced annual progress report, project brochures, calendars, diaries, hoarding boards, events news etc. to share the status of the project to the donor, line ministry and other stakeholders. The project developed videos focusing on results of value chains, effectiveness of project approaches, theme and tools during the reporting year. The developed knowledge products were shared through social networks, newspapers and radio. The radio programs were based on the crop cycle activities in seven value chain commodities, Business Literacy Classes (BLCs), service market, business and market and shared through Radio Nepal and FM stations of project districts. The project has also been sharing the short stories of the farmers through project facebook page regularly.

The project has also prepared and published HVAP Approach comprising 5 project practice briefs: inclusive value chain development, multi-stakeholder’s platform (establishing business linkage), service market development, inclusive producer’s group formation, financing and project management and one policy brief: inclusive value chain development, lessons learned from High Value Agriculture Project during the reporting period. These news, reports, stories and other knowledge products have been uploaded in the HVAP website (www.hvap.gov.np) and in IFAD Asia Website.

Output 3.5: 2 Review and Planning Workshops Conducted

The project has organized 2 review and planning workshops at project level during the reportingyear. During the workshops the project has reviewed the results of the past year and made a detailed action plan for the running year and coming year. The project also shared its progresses in central (MoAD) and regional progress review workshops. During the internal review, the SWOT analysis was done in participation of the project staff which is given below:

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 43 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Strengths u Value chain based project. u Tablet based M&E System including data base established. u Guidelines developed and applied for Monitoring and Evaluation and data management as well. u MIS system established. u GESI and group development approach implemented. u Service market strengthened: Private Service Providers mobilized. u Contract done between Agribusiness and POs with provision of embedded services. u Facilitation in B2B, B2S, and S2S u Inclusive business promotion. u Physical infrastructure (market linkage) u Introduction of new technologies u Good Project performance in IFAD Nepal portfolio u Multi-disciplinary working team from different fields. u HVAP value chain commodities (ginger and timur) exported in European market u Highly motivated and hard working staffs. u No turnover of Project Manager (Over 7 years / project period)

Weakness u More load to Social Mobilizers (more Producer’s Organizations to one SM) u POs members are often changed u Elite capture in leadership posts of the POs u Still some poor households are excluded u Elite PO members capture the project resources u Delayed in installment release u Weak POs management u Weak social mobilization u Difficult to coordinate at local level when PMU direct dealt with PO members u Limited monitoring from VC teams u Lack of knowledge on about the infrastructure of the Project u Some agribusinesses didn’t perform their jobs properly u Limitation of BLC participants into 25 u Unavailability of detail Business Plan information at PO level u No field allowance to field staff u Poor data at PO level u Poor quality of infrastructure

Opportunities u ASDP designed based on HVAP learning as follow on project u Value chain approach incorporated in 20 Years Agriculture Development Strategy of Nepal u Agri insurance started u Province can follow the learning of HVAP

Page 44 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 u Value chain based micro-enterprise started u Cooperative can lead for market arrangement u Availability of Private Service Providers u Banks established at local level u Value Chain knowledge transferred to local level u Regional level market established u Spatial Infrastructure developed u Institutional capacity of the local institutions developed u Increased access in VC finance/Insurance

Threats u Poor quality control system. u Lack of quality/organic certification u Introduction of pesticides and chemical fertilizer in the organic certified area u Incidence of pest and diseases in the crop and livestock u Dumping of sub-standard and poor quality products from India due to open border u Price fluctuation of marketable commodities u Frequent policy/directive changes and different support modaiities of the government

Output 3.6: Facilitated to Mission Team:

Two IFAD Missions: ASDP final program design mission and project pre-completion mission teams were facilitated during the reporting period: one in August 2017 and another in June 2018. The design team shared the ASDP approach, implementing mechanism, partners, funds to newly elected local representatives of . The team also collected the feedback from the local representatives. Two workshops were organized in Salyan and Surkhet districts by making representation from all 10 districts of the Karnali Province.

The pre-completion mission team discussed on about the project results and observed the project activities in the field. The team also shared the templates of the project completion report. During the mission’s visit, the team assessed the project performance which is given below Table 41.

Table 41: Indicators and rating of the project by pre-completion mission team (June, 2018)

Program Activity and Ranking Score (full 6) Targeting and outreach is rated highly satisfactory 6 Gender Equality and Women’s participation is rated satisfactory 5 Agriculture Productivity is rated satisfactory 5 Nutrition is rated satisfactory 5 Adaptation to Climate Change is rated satisfactory 5 Institutions and Policy Engagement is rated satisfactory 5 Partnership Building is rated satisfactory 5 Human and Social Capital and Empowerment is rated satisfactory 5 Quality of beneficiary participation is rated satisfactory 5

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 45 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Program Activity and Ranking Score (full 6) Responsiveness of service providers is rated moderately satisfactory 4 Environment and natural resources management is rated satisfactory 5 Exit strategy is rated Satisfactory 5 Potential for scaling up is rated satisfactory 5 Quality of Project Management is rated satisfactory 5 Knowledge management is rated satisfactory 5 Value for Money is rated satisfactory 5 Coherence between AWPB and implementation is rated moderately satisfactory 4 Performance of M&E systems is rated satisfactory 5 Acceptable Disbursement Rate is rated satisfactory 5 Quality of financial management is rated moderately satisfactory 4 Quality and timeliness of audit is rated moderately satisfactory 4 Counterpart funds is rated is moderately satisfactory 4 Compliance with loan covenants is rated satisfactory 5 Procurement Review is rated satisfactory 5 Overall Project Implementation is rated satisfactory 5 Likelihood of achieving development objectives is rated satisfactory 5 Relevance is rated satisfactory 5 Effectiveness is rated satisfactory 5

Output 3.7: Office Materials Purchased:

The project purchased different 13 office materials and machineries during the reporting year to implement project activities effectively and efficiently. The detail no. of purcharsed materials in the reporting year is given in Table 42.

Table 42: List of materials and machineries purcharsed in reporting year

S.N. Materials/Machineries Unit No. 1 Motorcycle No. 3 2 Laptop No. 1 3 Hard Disk 500 MB No. 8 4 Hard Disk 1 TB No. 2 5 Printer No. 5 6 Desk top computer No. 1 7 File Racks No. 2 8 Steel Glass door Cabinet No. 2 9 Revolving Chairs No. 4 10 Office Tables No. 2 11 Steel Racks No. 4 12 Freez No. 1 13 Stand Fans No. 2 Total 37

Page 46 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Output 3.8: Various Teams Facilitated

The project has facilitated the three teams: ASDP design team, Bangaladesh team (CDSP), Bhutan Team (CARLEP) and Combodian Team (AIMS) during the reporting period. The project shared its results: outputs, outcomes, impacts, project learning, project experiences, project approaches, project modalities, experiences gained during implementation etc to the team during their visits to HVAP. The direct interaction programs were also organized with project stakeholders during their field visits.

Output 3.9: One Media Trip Organized

A media trip was organized on 2-8 July 2018 in Surkhet-Jumla road corridor covering two districts: Kalikot and Jumla. A total of 8 media people from local news papers, national news paper, radio and FMs participated in the trip. During the trip, the media people interacted with different producers’ organizations, agribusinesses and private service providers along the road corridor. The media people also developed the knowledge products such as success stories, radio programs, news and articles and shared to mass people through Picture 7: Media Person collecting information from their respective media. Private Service Provider, Kalikot

Output 3.10: Results and Impact Management System (RIMS) Final Survey Conducted

A Result and Impact Management System (RIMS) survey was conducted during the reporting year. The IFAD designed questionnaires were used in the survey to 900 sampled households from the 7 project districts. A two days orientation trainng was organized to the enumerators before the survey. The field test was also done during the orientation training. The detail indicators and its result is given in Annex C.

Output 3.11: 2 Value Chain cum Exposure Visits Organized

Two value chain training cum exposure visits: one in Thailand and another one in Indonesia were organized by the project during the reporting year. The representatives from the Ministry of Agriculture Development, Ministry of Forest, National Planning Commission, line agencies, and regional Directorate of Forest, Livestock Service and Agriculture participated in these visits. During the visits, they gained different knowledge about value chain, enterpreneruship, linkage among the value chain actors, value chain finance and agriculture finance, agriculture driving agro-enerprise etc. technology, market, service model, learning, best practice, rural innovation etc. The learning from the exposure visits will be used for the promotion of high value agriculture products within the HVAP program area.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 47 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Picture 8: HVAP team with Indonesian team in Bali, Indonesia

Financial Achievement

Output 1: 70% Financial Progress against the Target of the Reporting Period:

Component-wise expenditure:

NRs. 244.3 Million (70 % of the Target) was spent during the reporting year against the planned budget of NRs. 348.2 million. The project spent 69%, 60%, and 76% in component 1, component 2 and component 3 respectively against the planned budgets during the reporting year. NRs.1,572 million1 has been spent since the start of the project, excluding the contribution from agribusinesses and beneficiaries. Component-wise expenditure incurred in the reporting year and cumulative is given in Table 43. The detail activity-wise expenditure as of FY 2017/18 is also detailed out in Annex-B.

Table 43: Financial achievement by component in FY 2017/18 and Cumulative Amount NRs. in million Cumulative Planned and Achieved in Fiscal Expenditure Expenditure S.N. Components Year 2017/18 ( As of 16 Till Last Year July 2018) Planned Achieved Achieved % Achieved 1 Inclusive Value Chain 937.7 230.4 158.4 69 1096.1 Development 2 Sevice Market 59.8 23.6 14.1 60 73.9 Strengthening 3 Program Management 330.8 94.2 71.8 76 402.6 (Including M&E and KM) Total 1328.3 348.2 244.3 70 1572.6

1This is the sum of the expenditures (contribution) from GoN, IFAD and SNV as per reflection in the Redbook

Page 48 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Financial Achievement (NRs.million) During the Fiscal Year 2017/18 by Components

Figure 10: Planned Vs Achievement on Expenditure during FY 2017/18.

Expenidiure as per sources of fund:

A total of USD 17.26 million out of total project cost of USD 18.87 million has been spent including all sources of funds till the end of the FY 2017/18, accounting for 91.47 % of progress. Calculating in Nepalese currency, NRs. 1748 millioin has been spent out of the total project budget of NRs. 1888 million till the end of the reporting year. This has been illustrated in Table 44 and Figure 11 & 12.

Table 44: Total Project Costs and Expenditure till the end of FY 2016/17

Total Project’s Budget Expenditure till FY 2016/17 (Million) (million) Sources of Fund USD NRs. USD NRs. Progress % Progress (USD) % (NRs.) Government of Nepal 1.72 171.87 1.31 132.68 76.16 77.20 IFAD 15.28 1526.86 13.35 1351.6 87.37 88.52 SNV 0.7 69.95 0.89 88.72 127.14 126.83 Beneficiary 0.56 55.96 0.54 55.04 96.43 98.36 Agribusiness 0.61 63.3 1.17 119.64 191.80 189.00 Total 18.87 1887.94 17.26 1747.68 91.47 92.57 Progress % 91.47 92.57

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 49 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18)

Figure 11: Total Project Budget and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in USD by Financier

Figure 12: Total Project Cost and Expenditure till FY 2017/18 in Nepali Rupee by Financier

Page 50 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Output 2: IFAD disbursed 85.08% since the start of the Project:

IFAD has disbursed 85.08% of the total project fund till the reporting period, excluding initial deposit based on the USD. The project has high disbursement (117%) in category V.a. (Salaries) and lowest (76%) in category IV (Funds), so the project has to speed up to disburse in category IV in the 2018/19. More details are provided inTable 45.

Table 45: Status of Disbursement from IFAD (USD)

S.N. Category Budget (US$) Disbursed (US$) Disbursed % 1 I. Vehicles and Equipment 418,288.00 421,857.92 100.85 2 II. Studies, Surveys, Training, and Workshops 2,574,080.00 2,363,856.57 91.83 3 III. Service Provider Contracts 3,861,120.00 3,261,870.30 84.48 4 IV. Funds 6,596,080.00 4,998,224.74 75.78 5 Va. Salaries 868,752.00 1,013,315.23 116.64 6 Vb. Operation and Maintenance 804,400.00 806,627.58 100.28 Total excluding initial deposit 15,122,720.00 12,865,752.34 85.08 Initial Deposit 1,200,000.00 Total Including Initial Deposit 15,122,720.00 14,065,752.34 93.01

C. LESSON LEARNT

The project has learnt the following lessons during its implementation: l Groups are found easy to mobilize in clusters; l Continuous technical backstopping is important and necessary to producers’ organizations (POs). For this, government and private service providers have important role; l Institutional capacity development of POs is equally important, which has to be facilitated by NGOs; l Business Development Service (BDS) is also important for agribusinesses and POs for which DCCIs and private service providers have to play the role; l Multi-Stakeholders Consultative Platform (MSP) can play a vital role in overall sector development of the value chains; l Local level agribusinesses at the clusters and regional hubs are also important to be promoted by the project for the VC development.

D. CONCLUDING REMARKS

The project could accomplish most of the targeted activities during the reporting year. The project covered 118% of the targeted households till the reporting year. It has also met the target of women inclusion (63%) and inclusion of Dalits and Janajatis (31%) till the reporting year. Similarly, achieving the target of additional income by the participating households is also seen satisfactory (NRs. 46,055). The project has developed the market linkage and increased the sales volume by 255% against the baseline. Similarly, the project has facilitated to supply the two commodities: ginger and timur in European market. The lesson learnt of the project will be applied in new project named Agriculutre Sector Development Program (ASDP) which is to be implemented in the same area of HVAP to increase the economic growth through commercialization of agriculture.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 51 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Per Per Per (NRs) (NRs) Income Income Average Average Average 7,007.49 5,202.75 4,390.79 1,916.61 11,770.14 13,313.98 25,025.26 13,279.50 47,064.84 21,152.77 72,039.96 91,098.99 37,367.33 18,210.36 16,905.57 59,334.90 Household Household 66.0 37.1 26.5 58.2 12.7 86.7 33.7 (NRs (NRs Total Total Total 676.5 178.2 190.7 524.0 736.5 134.7 102.0 1055.1 1,808.3 Income Income million) million) 66.0 37.1 26.5 58.2 12.7 64.7 81.8 76.8 27.4 (NRs (NRs 676.4 178.2 103.7 277.0 384.4 Other Other Other 1055.1 1,015.9 Income Income million) million) 7.3 7.4 6.1 0.7 6.3 Net Net 24.6 85.8 45.5 87.1 22.1 52.8 25.2 (NRs (NRs 177.4 247.0 352.1 792.5 Income Income million) million) 9.2 7.8 1.3 7.3 31.6 10.4 57.8 93.7 24.1 57.9 29.4 (NRs (NRs Sales Sales 106.9 225.0 264.5 392.9 869.9 Income Income million) million) 7.0 3.1 1.8 1.7 0.6 6.7 2.0 5.1 4.2 1.0 21.1 12.3 47.6 17.6 40.8 77.3 Cost Cost (NRs (NRs Total Total Total million) million) 0.2 0.1 3.8 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.0 6.0 0.2 0.1 1.7 2.7 0.0 0.3 0.1 5.2 Cost Cost (NRs (NRs Other Other Other million) million) 4.1 1.9 8.6 1.4 0.9 0.4 4.2 1.5 7.3 5.0 2.8 0.7 11.1 28.3 23.8 45.3 Cost Cost (NRs (NRs Labour Labour Labour million) million) 2.7 1.1 6.2 2.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 2.2 0.4 8.5 0.1 1.1 0.2 13.3 14.2 26.8 Cost Cost (NRs (NRs million) million) Material Material 9.0 65.0 98.8 27.2 Sales Sales 378.5 285.2 292.8 834.7 901.8 (MT) (MT) 1156.9 2073.8 4261.1 1,778.0 1,253.1 Volume Volume Volume 15,119.0 10,225.3 - 8.0 2.0 0.4 1.1 1.4 17.8 12.4 43.2 22.6 255.9 257.0 553.4 274.4 435.1 777.7 Volume (MT) Volume (MT) Volume Consumption Consumption - 3.2 1.3 1.1 1.2 19.2 16.5 10.8 51.5 17.1 Post Post Loss Loss 235.3 175.3 461.6 247.3 308.1 626.4 (MT) (MT) Harvest Harvest 70.3 10.8 29.8 415.5 315.2 316.0 901.8 101.1 (MT) (MT) 1647.2 2506.8 5282.0 2,301.4 1,022.2 1,313.8 Volume Volume Volume 10,977.7 16,647.7 Production Production Production 45.3 38.8 23.1 87.4 57.6 No.) No.) 119.1 485.7 760.0 276.61 1,035.4 51140.5 42465.2 94475.2 56,932.0 177,152.0 236,143.5 Area (Hec/ Area (Hec/ Area Production Production Production No. No. 372 372 1850 1045 3428 3865 1414 1383 1,850 1,045 3,428 3,865 1,414 1,383 13357 13,357 in POs in POs Farmers Farmers 62 44 22 44 14 62 44 22 44 14 116 116 142 444 142 444 (POs) (POs) Organization Organization No. of Producers’ No. of Producers’ No. of Producers’ Annex A: Detail of Baseline and After Intervention Production and Net Income by Value Chains After Intervention Production and Net Income by Value A: Detail of Baseline and Annex

E. and Income Baseline Production Volume Value Chains Apple Ginger Goat season Off vegetable Timur Turmeric Vegetable Seeds Total and Income After Intervention Production Volume Value Chains Apple Ginger Goat season Off vegetable Timur Turmeric Vegetable Seeds Total

Page 52 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 0 48 200 691 40.5 355.1 127.6 215.95 11071.4 6823.41 1939.87 6431.24 2771.24 4033.44 9980.605 8016.943 1640.355 46735.71 24826.01 Financial 35248.373 (‘000 NPR) 1 7 0 1 2 7 1 3 1 0 0 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 11 15 57 38 13 15 52 58 30 166 308 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 0 0 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 48 200 691 40.5 355.1 127.6 24826 215.95 11071.4 6823.41 1939.87 9980.61 8016.94 1640.36 6431.24 35248.4 2771.24 4033.44 46735.7 Financial (‘000 NPR) 1 7 1 2 7 1 3 1 11 15 57 38 13 15 52 58 30 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 166 308 Physical Cumulative Achievement No No No. No. No. No. No. Unit Events. Number Number Number Number Number Number Person-month Person-month Person-month Activities PROGRAMME VC Workshop Prioritization VC Baseline Studies VC Analysis and Strategy Development Validation Stakeholders Consultation, MSP Workshops, Workshop) Agribusiness engagement (Business Opportunity Agribusiness/producer contract facilitation B2B linkage Facilitation Publication of Study Reports PROGRAMME TOTAL PROCUREMENT (double cabin) Vehicles Motorcycles (150cc) Computers (laptop) Printer Camera Overhead projector (plus screen) TOTAL PROCUREMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OPERATIONAL EXPERTS TECHNICAL & Management Expert (international) Technical Senior Inclusive Business Expert (national) GESI Expert (national) Annex B: Physical and Financial Progress of FY 2017/18 and cumulative Annex B: Physical and Financial Progress of FY 1 2 3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.1 S.N. 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 SNV Part SNV COMPONENT 1: INCLUSIVE VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT 1: INCLUSIVE VALUE Chain Development and Business Facilitation Part One: Value

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 53 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278.32 978.25 6251.82 2712.04 8963.86 6155.83 3869.75 4420.31 1611.563 14581.43 33312.17 27060.21 10025.58 19924.74 25601.62 241459.8 1675.513 4024.793 Financial 157586.93 (‘000 NPR) 0 0 0 4 8 4 0 0 0 4 0 41 75 59 79 72 66 66 38 54 54 30 315 151 132 975 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 0 0 0 0 172.6 164.7 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 0 0 0 415 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 0 0 0 0 0 7 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 278.32 978.25 157587 241460 14581.4 33312.2 27060.2 6251.82 2712.04 8963.86 6155.83 3869.75 10025.6 4420.31 19924.7 25601.6 1438.96 1675.51 3860.09 Financial (‘000 NPR) 4 8 4 4 0 41 75 59 79 72 66 66 38 54 47 29 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 315 151 132 975 Physical CumulativeAchievement No Unit Days Days Times Driver Month Times. Officer Number Number Districts Districts Person-month Person-month Person-month Activities ID/OS Expert (national) Chain Expert (national) Value VC expert, Development Expert (changed to Producer Organisation national) EXPERT TECHNICAL OF TOTAL STAFF SUPPORT SNV Support Officer Driver STAFF OF SUPPORT TOTAL AND DSA TRAVEL Travel DSA AND DSA TRAVEL TOTAL AND MAINTANENCE OPERATION O&M Vehicles Motorcycles O&M Equipment O&M COST MANAGEMENT SNV TOTAL AND MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OPERATIONAL TOTAL SNV AEC Part PROGRAMME Capacity Strengthening of DCCIs Orientation, capacity assessment of DCCIs of DCCIs Staff Training AEC (in each DCCI of project area) Support to satellite unit of Prepare capacity building plan for DCCIs 1 1 3.3 3.4 3.5 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 S.N. 3.1.4 3.1.5 3.1.6 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3

Page 54 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 55.9 72.07 322.8 857.8 338.33 978.15 1480.8 267.63 590.43 432.98 317.98 359.595 1963.39 2458.95 1664.66 7722.269 4244.961 6567.946 Financial 17339.595 (‘000 NPR) 1 1 0 2 3 0 9 0 6 3 9 0 0 5 6 6 4 90 16 32 53 13 22 21 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 174 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 191 1105 1105 337.3 141.3 332.3 101.8 101.8 1876.4 Financial (‘000 NPR) 8 7 7 2 1 3 2 2 0 20 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 415 150 150 100 200 300 1140 1140 2005 Financial ‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 7 7 7 2 2 2 1 3 0 19 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 221 55.9 72.07 857.8 338.33 858.39 836.85 1289.8 267.63 488.63 432.98 317.98 7384.97 359.595 4244.96 5462.95 2126.65 15463.2 1664.66 Financial (‘000 NPR) 1 1 2 3 9 8 4 3 7 5 6 6 4 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 11 82 32 46 19 21 154 Physical Cumulative Achievement No No No. No. No. No. Year Year Unit Year. Times Times Groups Meetings Members. Activities Exposure visit to DCCIs members Interaction between DCCIs and FNCCI members Sub-Total Market Information Management and Dissemination AEC Contract between DCCIs and for the data collector Training Flow of price information through website Allowances for Information collection Sub-Total Policy Dialogues and Response Agribusiness working group Formation and operation of HVAP Policy dialogues/Meetings Sub-Total Chain Learning and Best Practices Value on VC Training Documentation & Publication Sub-Total PROGRAMME TOTAL PROCUREMENT Equipments Means of transport, Motorcycle Camera Office equipment, Computer (Laptop) Printers TOTAL PROCURMENT 2 3 4 2 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 55 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 380 3249 5300 427994 6056.77 4878.76 921.215 313.406 3393.39 1921.64 10739.72 10460.12 6928.898 5940.346 13260.15 11533.164 61401.399 80405.654 321865.46 Financial (‘000 NPR) (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 0 0 3 5 90 84 66 30 32 24 16 40 28 40 59 711 126 516 516 108 751 1686 Cumulative Achievements Physical 90 429 309 700 42.6 1738 2100 958.1 445.6 63200 66090 1547.4 1296.2 2619.5 1395.3 10780.7 12657.1 12657.1 Financial (‘000 NPR) 8 3 3 3 1 1 3 12 12 18 12 73 93 93 68 47 12 130 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 90 429 309 400 100 1596 1689 1329 2634 1400 1200 3510 1500 11086 13091 13091 147825 152925 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target 0 3 3 1 1 3 12 12 12 24 12 80 99 99 25 30 12 70 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 380 2820 3200 5533.6 309208 364794 385779 9192.32 8722.12 4760.57 8913.66 3920.66 5631.35 475.615 270.806 50620.7 67748.6 3393.39 1831.64 12560.2 Financial (‘000 NPR) 2 4 78 76 54 27 29 21 16 28 28 37 61 47 108 443 618 448 621 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 1593 Cumulative Achievement Physical No. No. Unit Times Gos/Cos Gos/Cos Sub-Projects Sub-Projects Month/Years Person-month Person-month Person-month Person-month Person-month Person-month Activities OPERATIONAL COSTS AND MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OPERATIONAL VCD officer Salary of Salary of IB officer Institutional Development Officer Business Development Officers (two) and Transportation Travel DSA AEC Central Coordinator Salary of Salary of support officer AEC management Cost Equipment O&M Equipments Transport Office Equipments AND MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL OPERATIONAL AEC TOTAL Part One Total Chain Development Value Support in Two: Part Sub-Component 1.1: Fund and Facilities Chain Fund Value VC fund Support and Orientation Verification Field Evaluation Cost BPAP VC fund support for Sector Development and Service Market Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation VCF Total 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.1 1.1 S.N. 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.5

Page 56 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 750 450 4200 2300 1280 1000 3880 60300 67550 10000 12730 605.23 218.31 17993.45 19085.39 451869.18 Financial (‘000 NPR) (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 11 28 19 20 69 24 10 54 23 95 260 104 165 Cumulative Achievements Physical 400 550 300 650 150 300 300 4300 5400 7300 31800 33050 Financial NPR) (‘000 5 1 1 6 7 2 4 3 3 13 16 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 0 0 0 300 700 200 300 5750 1040 7000 8200 1200 14500 21590 Financial (‘000 NPR) Year 2017/18) Year 0 0 0 3 7 4 0 7 0 1 6 6 5 20 21 18 Annual Target (Fiscal Annual Target Physical 0 0 38 200 630 300 700 3800 2000 5700 7330 3580 28500 34500 605.23 218.31 11785.4 17993.5 Financial (‘000 NPR) 1 7 6 8 0 7 0 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 23 18 14 56 17 38 23 92 260 104 165 Cumulative Achievement Physical . No No No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Unit times Times Times NGOs Groups Groups Districts Gos/Cos Gos/Cos Gos/Cos Activities 1.2: Sector Development Fund Sector Based Research and Demonstration Sector Infrastructure Development Sectoral Support (market promotion, certification, study etc) and Monitoring Verification Field SDF Total Social Inclusion Fund (SIF) Spatial Inclusion Fund (SIF) Workshop District Level Interaction VC District training District level annual review workshop District spatial inclusion fund Management cost for evaluation committee Feasibility Study/monitoring and supervision SIF Total Poverty Inclusion Fund (PIF) Production needs assessment and training Contracted NGO capacity building Production /Post harvest support activities (training) Exibition/action research/increase production program Production Input Support Poverty Inclusion Support District Based Farming System/Food facility Verification Management Cost of Field and workshops Trainings S.N. 1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.3 1.3.1 1.3.1.1 1.3.1.2 1.3.1.3 1.3.1.4 1.3.1.5 1.3.1.6 1.3.2 1.3.2.1 1.3.2.2 1.3.2.3 1.3.2.4 1.3.2.5 1.3.2.6 1.3.2.7 1.3.2.8 1.3.2.9

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 57 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 58.9 7035 5715 4154 5268 19822 14399 2823.6 8412.93 71510.2 51070.31 54531.58 Financial 113807.08 583219.49 (‘000 NPR) 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 2 4 7 0 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 59 26 35 35 12 48 713 161 224 560 1587 1003 Physical Cumulative Achievements 850 500 450 900 1100 8700 2250 13499 18449 13450 113240 Financial (‘000 NPR) 6 9 0 7 7 7 1 10 32 111 168 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 875 700 500 900 1200 2400 3000 12250 18225 13950 185115 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 0 6 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 26 25 36 82 112 135 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 900 58.9 6535 5715 3704 4368 17572 1973.6 469979 7312.93 42370.3 54531.6 95358.1 58060.2 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 2 4 7 0 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 11 53 26 28 28 48 704 151 224 528 892 1419 Physical Cumulative Achievement No. No. No. Unit Times Times Person Person Groups Groups Groups Districts Districts Contract Packages Activities Capacity Strengthening of Service Providers Monitoring & Evaluation (including field verification) PIF Total Sub-Component 1.1 Total Sub-Component 1.2: Group Formation and Strengthening Local NGOs contract Activities of LNGO Field Group & cooperative meetings/Mapping/documentation Project Orientation and capacity assessment of groups cooperatives Group Management and documentation training Saving and credit training Enterprise Training Development and cooperative observation tour Inter-groups to Farmers Tour Foreign observation Social Mobilization Group Mobilization & Strengthening by National NGO Group Mobilization & Strengthening by Local NGO Model Development (savings & credit, group management) Training of Service Providers to staff Training Skill Enhancement Monitoring and Evaluation Sub-Component 1.2 Total Sub-component 1.3: Gender and Social Inclusion Package Development Training Training Need Assessment Training Skills and Vocational S.N. 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.5 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8 1.2.9 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.2.11 1.2.10 1.2.12 1.2.13 1.2.14 1.2.15 1.3.2.11 1.3.2.10

Page 58 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 0 100 1503 7375 5373 3050 6212 5065 5025 5389 5050 3543 7832 40562 2270.2 169.61 5044.78 4875.17 1095447 76554.98 Financial 773581.55 (‘000 NPR) 0 7 3 0 2 2 11 11 18 22 15 13 72 17 14 13 39 311 154 380 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 1020 3167 4853 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 0 0 950 900 600 300 1350 1200 2850 11000 13450 145139 157796 Financial (‘000 NPR) 6 3 0 3 1 4 90 12 111 311 404 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 600 700 1050 1050 1500 1500 3600 3000 11250 13950 10300 217290 230381 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 1 7 1 3 1 1 0 3 7 0 12 90 112 428 329 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 100 1503 7375 5373 2100 5312 4465 3675 4189 5050 3543 7532 29562 63105 23989 2270.2 169.61 628443 937651 5044.78 4875.17 Financial (‘000 NPR) (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 0 7 9 3 2 2 11 18 22 10 60 17 14 10 10 35 311 154 290 909 2856 4449 Cumulative Achievement Physical No. No. No. No. No. No. No. VCs HHs Unit Times Times Times Times Times Times Groups Districts Activities Monitoring & Supervision to women Training Functional Literacy Averse Households Identification of Risk Averse HHs Identification of Risk Trainings Awarness Gender and Inclusion Action Plan and Exposure visit Gender Business Literacy Class Review of Business Literacy Class (Mid-term and Final) Trainings Business TOT Literacy and Monitoring for inclusiveness Visit Field Part SNV WS GSI strategy and tool kit development including consultation Partners awareness training Service provider / HVAP & capacity building workshops Sub-Component 1.3 Total Total Part Two Component One Total Agencies District Level Line and Capacity Building (business Training market management) and Capacity Building (Technical) Training (Asian countries) to Ling agencies officers Visit Exposure (Asian countries) to field technicians Visit Exposure (incountries) Visit Sectoral Study Agencies Sub-total of Line COMPONENT 2: SERVICE MARKET STRENGTHENING MARKET 2: SERVICE COMPONENT Sub-Component 2.1: Mobilization and Capacity Building for Service Providers S.N. 1.3.4 1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 1.3.9 2.1.1 1.3.11 1.3.10 1.3.12 1.3.13 1.3.13 1.3.14 2.1.1.1 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.3 2.1.1.4 2.1.1.5

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 59 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 589 219 250 6273 3995 2428 26839 4081.3 2279.1 1038.7 2671.2 3465.4 1654.25 5280.36 21278.31 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 2 7 2 5 11 17 28 26 16 12 102 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till Physical Cumulative Achievements 299 250 950 450 650 3250 247.9 216.9 253.1 859.4 1876.3 Financial (‘000 NPR) 2 1 3 7 5 1 7 2 3 1 18 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 300 250 250 300 600 700 1050 2100 3500 1000 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 5 1 6 2 0 3 1 18 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 589 219 2606 3023 3045 1978 2250 739.7 19402 4081.3 2279.1 2418.1 1406.35 5063.46 Financial (‘000 NPR) 9 3 5 0 2 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 9 5 2 9 4 17 21 21 84 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till Physical Cumulative Achievement No. Unit Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Amount Districts Districts Activities District Chamber of Commerce and Industries (DCCIs) Capacity Building Training Chamber Management and Planning Training Business development and service market Exposure Visit Market Information Collection and Dissemination to information collectors Training Manual/guideline developmenat for MIS/SMS MIS (Market Informaiton System) server upgrading MIS software installation and operation Grant to client for SMS service Feasibility Study of MIS subscription Information materails preparation based on MIS-SMS Publication of Information bulletine (monthly and timesterly) Agri Business Agri business profile preparation (with producers) District Agribusiness opportunity workshop Sub-total of DCCIs Service Providers (private) Documantation of local service providers and resource person Refreshment training to technical service providers Agro-vet and Para-vet Capacity building of Service providers mobiliation manual development Interaction workshop between service providers and local resource person Study tour (LRPs and LNGOS) S.N. 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.2.1 2.1.2.2 2.1.2.3 2.1.2.4 2.1.2.5 2.1.2.6 2.1.2.7 2.1.2.8 2.1.2.9 2.1.3.1 2.1.3.2 2.1.3.3 2.1.3.4 2.1.3.5 2.1.3.6 2.1.2.11 2.1.2.10 2.1.2.12 2.1.2.12 2.1.2.13

Page 60 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 12 300 440 261 100 300 333 2900 2596 3000 1239 2779 7318 5204 18442 860.85 2392.5 3393.64 66559.31 73877.31 10203.77 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 2 8 3 6 2 4 1 1 1 7 30 74 17 30 57 40 20 19 31 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 215 272 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 95 850 750 950 550 400 6400 1250 2950 2700 1750 11126.3 14076.3 Financial (‘000 NPR) 7 0 6 1 3 3 2 12 26 48 12 25 73 31 Annual Achievement (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 900 900 900 100 600 450 7000 1400 1000 4200 3000 1800 19400 23600 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 7 2 6 1 3 3 6 12 25 50 12 27 77 10 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 12 300 489 440 261 100 300 333 860 1746 1750 1829 4368 2504 12042 55433 59801 765.85 1992.5 2843.64 8453.77 Financial (‘000 NPR) 2 2 3 9 5 2 4 1 1 1 7 18 48 10 18 32 17 16 29 167 199 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till Physical Cumulative Achievement No. No. No. No. No. No. Unit Time Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Activities Monitoring and Supervision Service Providers (private) Sub-Total Sub-component 2.1 Total Sub-Component 2.2: Partnership and Financial Services VC Finance/Insurance and Interaction Program on Awarness Need Identification and study on service development Linkage between service providers and clients Monitoring and field visit of Sub-Component 2.2 Total COMPONENT 2 TOTAL Component 3 : Project Management PMU Part PROGRAMME Project Implementation Manual (PIM) approval & publication Project Documentary Development Information & Communication Center (ICC) Establishment NGO Operational Manual Project Fund Operation Manual Project Financial Operational Manual Project Steering Committee meeting Project Start Up Meeting (Surkhet) Project Consultative and Coordination Group Meeting Workshop Planning & Review (Central) Workshop Project Launch (District level) Workshop Project Orientation 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.11 1.12 S.N. 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.1.3.7

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 61 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 0 69 860 635 145 995 5704 4215 2500 1000 11479 40739 16081 14840 2404.6 6602.5 3071.7 2118.73 3266.86 1060.36 1842.89 18470.22 13904.45 Financial (‘000 NPR) 5 4 1 0 0 4 9 1 1 1 0 1 9 4 3 13 53 64 17 49 61 65 114 105 328 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 0 300 840 995 450 150 2100 2100 1350 3000 2500 7000 3350 2460 3800 Financial (‘000 NPR) - 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 30 21 20 21 60 12 12 cal (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physi 500 840 500 600 2200 2100 1400 3150 3684 1500 3000 3000 9000 3450 2639 4000 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 2 1 5 1 1 3 1 12 21 19 21 12 60 12 12 12 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 0 0 0 69 635 145 4354 8479 4215 1000 11040 33739 12731 12369 2104.6 4502.5 2621.7 11444.5 16370.2 2426.86 1060.36 1842.89 1968.73 Financial (‘000 NPR) 4 4 1 0 0 4 9 0 1 0 1 9 3 3 12 84 84 33 43 14 37 61 53 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 268 Physical Cumulative Achievement No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. L.S. Unit Staff Staff Staff Time times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Times Studies Person-month Activities Monitoring & Evaluation System Development Management Information System Development Monitoring and Evaluation Manuals Development to stakeholders on M&E and MIS Training to stakeholders on project Training Program Monitoring, Supervision and Reporting District working group meetings (DADC) Monitoring by PSC/PCCG/DWC Interaction workshop with Stakeholders Seminar Traveller Supporting Study & Survey for Project Outcome Monitoring Study Effect/Impact Project Completion Report Preparation Audit Results and Measurement System Project Baseline Survey (Including RIMS Indicator) Contracting Experts (From PMU) Other Consultancy Service (Account & other statistical software package AMC contract, Project Planning, Monitoring and Others) computer skills, - logistic funded project staffs on Financial Management to IFAD Training support supervision mission logistic management IFAD Office rent (Project Management Unit, Surkhet, Contact Office, Kathmandu) for Project activities Vehicle Hiring Contracting Computer operator(2), Driver (2), Office Messenger (4) (Foreign Country) Tour Chain Study Value (Foreign Country) for PMU Staff Training Chain Value 1.2 1.3 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 1.27 1.28 1.29 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37 S.N.

Page 62 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 0 20 385 935 349 780 120 6990 1300 72.95 365.8 12369 14038 13801 41718 323.54 545.02 781.86 353.99 1130.05 5181.09 1093.36 Financial 267559.66 (‘000 NPR) 7 1 3 7 0 0 0 0 4 5 2 6 2 5 4 2 27 73 12 67 42 10 24 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 742 1907 Physical Cumulative Achievements 115 100 140 3800 3200 3500 11100 57590 Financial (‘000 NPR) 1 1 3 1 3 12 150 391 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 100 150 120 4000 4800 3840 12012 72265 Financial (‘000 NPR) Year 2017/18) Year 1 1 3 1 3 12 168 403 Annual Target (Fiscal Annual Target Physical 0 20 35 385 795 349 780 120 3190 1300 72.95 365.8 10838 10301 30618 323.54 545.02 666.86 353.99 209970 1030.05 5181.09 1093.36 Financial (‘000 NPR) 6 1 3 6 0 0 4 5 2 6 2 5 4 2 11 24 61 67 42 10 21 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 592 1516 Physical Cumulative Achievement L.S. L.S. L.S. Unit Staff Time Times Product Website Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Person-month Activities Value Chain Training for Stakeholder (Including PMU Staff) Training Chain Value Project GIS Mapping Office Furnishing Updating Website Project Project Brochure, Pamplet, Leaflets, Flex, Calender, Diary preparation, publication and distribution Hoarding Board, Newspaper, TV, (Radio, Visibility Advertisement & Project Bag, Cap etc) T-Shirt, LNGO Induction Contract Team Technical Workshop Audit Group formed & Public PROGRAMME (PMU) TOTAL PROCUREMENT ITEMS PROCUREMENT MACHINERY Desktop Comp (Branded with Softwares), softwares) Laptop Comp (With Fax Machine Accesory part Photocopy Machine Digital Camera Generator Battery) Inverter (With UPS Printers Intercom Installation Telephone Multimedia Projector Screen Scanning Machine 2 1.4 2.1 1.38 1.39 1.41 1.42 1.43 1.44 1.45 1.46 S.N. 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.11 2.1.10 2.1.12 2.1.13

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 63 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) 0 0 0 0 0 35 145 594 47.51 27829 241.38 160.29 1144.06 5518.28 5518.28 16279.7 2276.63 6876.25 10633.07 13279.77 29751.98 45903.33 30233.34 58062.34 Financial 371525.33 (‘000 NPR) 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 11 42 42 59 68 12 36 48 22 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 185 295 2250 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 255 725 412 1137 1392 5307 7532 12839 71821 Financial (‘000 NPR) 4 0 3 1 4 8 0 399 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 0 270 201 201 750 2500 3250 3721 7471 10709 18180 94166 Financial (‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 4 3 3 0 0 2 1 3 10 12 12 24 437 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 0 145 594 47.51 28615 20297 241.38 160.29 299704 44511.3 1144.06 10378.1 5518.28 5518.28 12554.8 15867.7 24926.3 45223.3 2276.63 6876.25 Financial (‘000 NPR) 3 0 5 2 2 1 1 0 11 42 42 56 64 12 36 48 22 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 181 287 1851 Physical Cumulative Achievement No. No. No. No. No. No. No. L.S. L.S. Unit Number Number Number Number Numbers Activities MACHINARY ITEMAS PROCUREMENT TOTAL ITEMAS PROCUREMENT MACHINARY FURNITURE ITEMS Almirah, Computer table/Chair, Revolving chair,Table,Sofa, Board etc FURNITURE ITEMS TOTAL ITEMS TRANSPORTATION Battery Cycle Cycles Motor cycle (Double Cab) Vehicle ITEMS TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PMU procurement Total AND MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OPERATIONAL Salary PMU Office Expenses TOTAL AND MISCELLANEOUS COSTS OPERATIONAL PMU Total Part) (SNV KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME Communication & IDOS/POS startegy development Knowledge Products (publication) Knowledge sharing events (national/regional workshops) on Knowledge Management Training Policy dialogue (meetings/workshops for act/bylaws) on Communication and Knowledge Training Visit Learning Route Exposure 3 2 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 2.1 S.N. 2.2.1 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7

Page 64 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 0 0 962 1802.16 17022.98 31079.75 Financial 402605.08 1571929.4 (‘000 NPR) 0 5 53 (Till July 15, 2018) (Till 3.38 100.38 2350.38 7475.38 Physical Cumulative Achievements 0 71821 243693 Financial (‘000 NPR) 0 399 876 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Annual Achievement Physical 0 94166 348147 Financial ‘000 NPR) Annual Target Annual Target 0 437 942 (Fiscal Year 2017/18) Year (Fiscal Physical 962 17023 330784 1802.16 31079.8 1328236 Financial (‘000 NPR) 5 53 (Till 15 July 2017) (Till 3.38 1951 6599 100.4 Physical Cumulative Achievement No. Unit Person-Month Person-Month Activities STAFF COST STAFF KM coordinator-national (25%) Communication officer-national Consultants (Gender/ID/Communication strategy moderation) TOTAL Part) (SNV KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT 3 TOTAL THREE COMPONENTS OF TOTAL Progress Percent 2.2 S.N. 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 65 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Assumption Availability of a stable social and of a stable social Availability is conducive that climate economic to value chain development policy and institutional Larger environment remains favourable Demand for high value commodities of persists. Continued commitment commercialization GoN to facilitate with partnership in of agriculture private sector

MIS MIS AOS Report Mid-term Means of verification RIMS Survey

57 44 23 87 79 44 34 95 8.9 2018 4969 10116 15965 15,965 46,055 107,860 248,621 356,481 as on 16 July Achievement Achievement - - 75 9.5 100 47.1 25.9 3375 8100 Base Base target 13,500 13,500 81,000 80,000 30,000 161,000 line-42.2 line-53.7 Baseline- Baseline- Baseline- Appraisal Baseline-69 Baseline-36 # # # # # # % % % % % % % % % HHs Unit NPR

Indicators Direct beneficiaries received project support Corresponding total no. of households reached Corresponding no. of household members reached (a) Indirect beneficiaries received project support (b) no. of beneficiaries Total support project received beneficiaries direct &Janjati Dalits (indigenous) beneficiaries received project support Women ownership assets household in improvement with HHs of % index [RIMS indicator] Reduction in malnutrition: % of children under minus two standard deviations from median height for age 5 below (stunting) of reference population [RIMS indicator]. Reduction in malnutrition: % of children under 5 below minusweight-for- median from deviations two standard height (wasting) of reference population [RIMS indicator]. Reduction in malnutrition: % of children under for age weight median from deviations standard two minus 5 below (underweight) of reference population [RIMS indicator]. Literacy rate of men [RIMS indicator]. Literacy rate of women [RIMS indicator]. % of HHs reporting reduction one hungry season [RIMS indicator] % of HHs reporting reduction two hungry seasons[RIMS indicator] of households by NPR. income annual Increase in average indicator). 30,000 in 2010 prices (COSOP % of Producer organization operating profitably at the end of the project Results Hierarchy Rural poor, especially women and marginal groups are marginal and women especially poor, Rural Annex C: Project Target vs Achievements (Project log frame) vs Annex C: Project Target Reduction of poverty and vulnerability of women and men and of women vulnerability and poverty of Reduction Outreach Goal: Development in hill and mountain areas of the Mid-Western Region needs this on MTR RIMS survey and is based provided data (The to be updated based on final RIMS survey) Purpose: value chains and markets in high value agriculture integrated dynamics to respond market with ability have improved income

Page 66 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Assumption

MIS MIS AOS AOS RIMS RIMS RIMS Means of verification

7 7 7 9 6 31 63 83 83 96 12 100 100 980 2018 2,394 8,617 13,357 as on 16 July Achievement Achievement

7 7

18 80 60 25 700 100 1,000 2,500 target 13,500 Appraisal

# # # # # # # # # % % % % % % % hhs Unit Indicators % of Dalits &Janjati direct beneficiaries received project services % of women direct beneficiaries received project services No. of of households reporting increase in productivity Agriculture crops High Value % of direct beneficiaries reporting higher farm gate prices compared to pre-project situation % of direct beneficiaries reporting increase in area under HVA % of direct beneficiaries reporting ability to withstand storage) tunnels, plastic (irrigation, shocks climatic (Achievement against this indicator needs to beverified and updated) chain value by financed infrastructures and equipment of % this indicator against (Achievement funds functioning needs to be verified and updated) % of POs that are active – POs that accounts have and in contact with the project. settled their No. of NGOs engaged No. of DCCIs supported No. of value chain assessments undertaken No. of value chains selected No. of Guidelines prepared AEC trained and supported of No. of staff No. of people trained in production, processing and marketing No. of persons attended business literacy No. of women in leadership position producer organization Results Hierarchy Producer Organization mobilization, value chain mobilization, Producer Organization Increased productivity and revenue from market and revenue Increased productivity 1: Outcome produce driven pro-poor value chains of high agriculture with improved commercial relations and partnerships Output 1.1: identification and capacity building

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 67 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Assumption

Means of verification

9 1 26 76 19 22 380 456 456 158 151 2018 5849 1646 6,228 10116 15965 34,655 as on 16 July Achievement Achievement 2 10 50 10 55 500 500 350 500 150 1730 8100 5400 target 31,000 13,500 Appraisal

# # # # # # # # # # # # # MT HHs Unit NPR million Indicators 2 Window No. of POs supported under 1 Window Agri-businesses supported under No. of No. of POs supported under PPF Agricultural/livestock production groups formed/ strengthened (RIMS indicator) supported (RIMS indicator) organizations Rural producers’ groups (RIMS production agricultural/livestock in People indicator) male female No. of plans supported through sector development facility fund under Inclusion Spatial under supported No. of plans Social Inclusion facility support No. of households supported under supplementary to poorer households under Social Inclusion facility No. of Seed certifications supported No. of action research supported of additional production (cumulative) Volume of Sales (cumulative) Value No. of groups/cooperatives reporting formal contracts No. of producers trained in technical aspects production Results Hierarchy

Page 68 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Assumption

Means of verification

7 57 21 446 604 500 760 784 265 1123 2018 2128 2840 1271 1049 as on 16 July Achievement Achievement 7 33 1158 1000 1500 1733 4244 6367 target Appraisal # # # # # # # # # # # # % ha Unit Indicators % of post-harvest loss reduced rated Industries and Commerce of Chambers District No. of satisfactory constructed/rehabilitated infrastructure Other productive (RIMS indicator) Land under improved management practices (RIMS indicator) and/or technologies practices in production Persons trained (RIMS indicator) Men trained in crops trained in crops Women Men trained in livestock trained in livestock Women or business activities income-generating in Persons trained management (RIMS indicator) Male Female of service providers trained (RIMS indicator) Staff Male Female Market, processing or storage facilities constructed rehabilitated (RIMS indicator) Market facilities constructed/rehabilitated Results Hierarchy

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 69 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Assumption There is a positive response to opportunities to improve agricultural productivity and markets. are appropriate activities Training and will lead to adoption of technology and practices. 375 POs are the 75% of 500 POs and out of 375 POs only 151 POs have formal contracts

MIS MIS AOS RIMS Means of verification

8 6 1 50 40 82 17 100 108 108 141 139 127 193 2018 8,302 5,386 as on 16 July Achievement Achievement 2 67 75 75 56 21 14 100 131 131 500 131 2,000 target 10,125 Appraisal

# # # # # # # # # # # % % % % Unit NPR million

Indicators Processing facilities constructed/rehabilitated Storage facilities constructed/rehabilitated % of Producer organization with improved access to technical advisory services No. of active service providers after project facilitation to project No. of loan products developed and offered beneficiaries % of producers who have received trainings adopted at least half of the technology % of project beneficiaries report improved terms of trade after two years % of involved agribusiness indicates expectation continuation of market arrangement after project Agro-vets) No. of functioning input suppliers (LRPs, and inputs use of quality increased reporting No. of producers services in access Increased cooperatives groups and No. of producers market information. of loan obtained by farmers after project facilitation Value trained No. of government department staff No. of private sector service providers mobilized and etc) Agro vet, Soil testing, LRP, strengthened (VAHW, No. of financial institutions (banks, MFIs, coops) piloted loan products with project beneficiaries after facilitation from the project No. of new borrowers annually enlisted by the financial institutions Results Hierarchy Improved access to technical services through Improved access to technical Marketing and technical support service Outcome 2: through services financial to and delivery extension pluralistic linkages with formal financial institutions Output 2.1: development – infrastructure and service providers

Page 70 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

(NRs.) 68,500.00 68,500.00 68,500.00 Total Sub- Total 118,250.00 593,000.00 459,400.00 688,402.00 703,418.00 278,786.00 200,400.00 242,480.00 233,200.00 218,880.00 214,860.00 225,950.00 240,340.00 241,000.00 238,700.00 240,000.00 577,996.00 104,500.00 104,500.00 164,876.00 2,211,340.00 2,482,538.00 2,528,240.00 1,828,012.00 3,398,259.00 Project Cost Project ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 86,699.00 54,500.00 34,250.00 59,125.00 34,250.00 54,500.00 82,438.00 34,250.00 411,000.00 200,000.00 152,880.00 152,880.00 643,918.00 520,500.00 294,502.00 446,159.00 (NRs.) Amount 50,000.00 34,250.00 59,125.00 34,250.00 50,000.00 82,438.00 34,250.00 393,000.00 459,400.00 535,522.00 550,538.00 278,786.00 200,400.00 242,480.00 233,200.00 218,880.00 214,860.00 225,950.00 240,340.00 241,000.00 238,700.00 240,000.00 491,297.00 2,117,240.00 1,838,620.00 1,690,840.00 1,533,510.00 2,952,100.00 Project Grant Project Hanku Talium Talium Jubitha Village Narakot Narakot Narakot Patmara Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Dillichaur Chilkhaya Kalikakhetu Garjyangkot Garjyangkot Kartik Swami Kartik Swami Kartik Swami Chandan Nath Chandan Nath Phoi Mahadev Phoi Mahadev Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot District Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Research Center Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Garjyngkot krishi sankalan kendra Horticulture research sttation, rajikot Nepal thopa sichai pvt. Ltd., kalikot Nepal thopa sinchai pvt.ltd Janjagaran falful tatha tarkari utpadan krisak samooh Mahabai falful tatha tarkari utpadan samuha fruit & vegetable production group Durga Kailash krishak samuh Kalika mahabai krishi samuha Kedar bhairab krisi sahakari sanstha Mahadevkali falful tatha tarkari utpadan samuha Mahila phalphul thata krishak samuha bahuudashya sahakari sanstha ltd Organic Phalphul thata tarkari krishak samuha Rara shau bebastapan krishak samuha Chaudhabis krishi sankalan kendra Galche falful tatha tarkari sankalan kendra Garjyngkot krishi sankalan kendra Shinja krishi bastu sankalan krishak samuha Gravity ropeway and improved tuin maintance Kamkhet galche falful tatha gravity ropway sanchalan krishak samuha Amar bahadur rawal Balrup thapa Bhim bahadur rawal Bir bahadur budha Dal bahadur mahatara Dal sing damai Dil maya budha PIF PIF SIF SIF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF SDF SDF SDF SDF ARD ARD ARD ARD Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category Annex D: List of Sub-Projects and Fund Value Value Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Chain 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 71 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks Total Total 68,500.00 48,000.00 68,500.00 69,000.00 48,000.00 68,500.00 48,000.00 71,000.00 48,000.00 68,500.00 53,200.00 100,700.00 105,000.00 174,700.00 104,500.00 367,958.00 917,978.00 761,390.00 821,347.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 4,000,000.00 9,284,860.00 2,203,854.00 1,684,043.00 1,570,348.00 1,837,505.00 1,123,136.00 1,374,255.00 1,860,656.00 10,000,000.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 275,625.00 237,837.00 335,077.00 414,791.00 322,328.00 187,457.00 525,646.00 34,250.00 24,000.00 34,500.00 50,850.00 35,500.00 34,250.00 34,250.00 24,000.00 55,000.00 24,000.00 54,500.00 26,600.00 24,000.00 34,250.00 87,350.00 843,664.00 459,073.00 121,910.00 530,468.00 4,642,430.00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 (NRs.) Amount 34,250.00 24,000.00 34,250.00 34,500.00 24,000.00 34,250.00 49,850.00 24,000.00 35,500.00 50,000.00 87,350.00 24,000.00 34,250.00 50,000.00 26,600.00 246,048.00 885,299.00 582,901.00 959,464.00 439,062.00 633,890.00 2,000,000.00 4,642,430.00 5,000,000.00 1,360,190.00 1,224,970.00 1,039,880.00 1,561,880.00 1,335,010.00 Project Grant Project Mahat Lamra Kudari Kudari Talium Jubitha Jubitha Village Raralihi Patmara Patmara Odanaku Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Dillichaur Dillichaur Chilkhaya Garjyangkot Kartik Swami Chandan Nath Chandan Nath Chandan Nath Chandan Nath Chandan Nath Phoi Mahadev Phoi Mahadev Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot District Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Ganga bahadur mahatara Jaidhane rokaya Jasikala budha Kal bahadur bohora individual service provider Kali bahadur adi Kanyawati neupane Karma kumari shahi Karna bahadur hamal Khamini mahatara Lima falful tatha tarkari firm Nabaraja koirala Nanda raj dhital Nar bahadur shahi Buda Pirthi bdr. Prakash falful tatha tarkari pasal Ratan bahadur rawat Rk apple processing and distilary udyog bdr shahi Tek Bishal krishi sahakari sanstha ltd,kalikot Chakhudanda falful utpadak krishak samuha Chandannath biuuttpadan samuha Dalit sewa krishak samuha Danphe Bahuudashaya Sahakary Sanstha Ltd Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Desne Mela Falful Dhadimul Falful Krishak Samuha Dhanchauri Chunkhani Bahudasya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Fulbari Falful Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Tatha Ganesh Falful Gothela Sana Kishan Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Value Value Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Chain 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 S.N.

Page 72 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 397,470.00 Sub-Project Cost (NRs.) 1,211,958.00 2,611,100.00 1,311,837.00 2,369,125.00 2,057,749.00 2,359,010.00 2,348,140.00 1,280,547.00 2,001,289.00 1,646,903.00 1,055,316.00 1,995,000.00 2,129,858.00 1,391,821.00 1,605,628.00 1,579,289.00 2,576,823.00 1,705,239.00 1,415,240.00 3,184,730.00 2,266,905.00 1,189,154.00 1,500,236.00 1,509,840.00 1,235,400.00 1,727,271.00 2,194,398.00 1,938,050.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 59,620.00 281,936.00 912,425.00 774,409.00 927,580.00 367,522.00 618,829.00 342,733.00 237,006.00 380,550.00 360,828.00 401,351.00 431,707.00 367,888.00 402,679.00 957,973.00 381,259.00 315,420.00 800,715.00 489,022.00 349,266.00 434,460.00 286,062.00 657,521.00 945,288.00 749,200.00 1,021,550.00 1,148,650.00 1,439,080.00 (NRs.) Amount 960,114.00 930,022.00 913,025.00 818,310.00 910,486.00 700,132.00 337,850.00 949,338.00 1,249,110.00 1,456,700.00 1,283,340.00 1,431,430.00 1,326,590.00 1,382,460.00 1,304,170.00 1,614,450.00 1,769,030.00 1,462,450.00 1,237,740.00 1,176,610.00 1,618,850.00 1,323,980.00 1,099,820.00 1,745,650.00 1,466,190.00 1,150,970.00 1,075,380.00 1,069,750.00 1,188,850.00 Project Grant Project Birat Badki Hanku Kudari Talium Talium Jubitha Jubitha Village Narakot Patmara Patmara Mugraha Ranchuli Ranchuli Ranchuli Sanigaun Sanigaun Dillichaur Dillichaur Dillichaur Dillichaur Chilkhaya Kartik Swami Kartik Swami Kartik Swami Chandan Nath Phoi Mahadev Phoi Mahadev Phoi Mahadev Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot District Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Jagriti Krishi Utpadan Krishak Samuh Janachetana Bahudasya Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Janajagaran Falful Utpadak Krishak Samuha Jharana Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Kailash Krishak Samuh Krishak Samuha Ayojna Kalapani Sano Sinchai Utpadan Kirshak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Kalashilla Phalphul Kalika Falful Utpadan Krishak Samuha Kalika Jan Upvokta Krishak Samuha Kalika Krishi Bahuudashaya Sahakary Sanstha Ltd Thata Phalphul Utpadak Samuha Tarkari Kalika Kedar Bhairab Krisi Sahakari Sanstha Khalla Falful Krishak Samuha Koirelpani Krishak Sanmuha Utpadak Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Kotgaira Falful Krishi Utpadak Krishak Samuha Lali Guransh Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Laligurans Falful Krishak Samuha Laligurans Krishi Utpadak Krishak Samuha Rin Sahakari Samuha Tatha Laxmi Bachat Mahadev Falful Samuha Mahadev Falful Utpadak Krishak Samuha Mahadev Jansewa Krishi Utpadak Krishak Samuha Phalphul Samuha Tatha Tarkari Mahila Thata Phalphul Krishak Samuha Tarkari Mahila Malika Khadyanna Utpadak Krishak Samuha Malika Krishi Bahuudasya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Malika Sobalamban Bahu Udasya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Bahuudashya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Organic Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Value Value Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Chain 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 73 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks Total Total 902,767.00 940,896.00 504,370.00 476,650.00 454,126.00 293,346.00 255,000.00 187,646.00 276,536.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,775,148.00 1,012,106.00 1,312,340.00 1,610,326.00 2,391,637.00 1,408,641.00 1,328,514.00 1,645,683.00 1,771,267.00 1,664,424.00 1,657,784.00 3,440,400.00 2,087,425.00 2,325,035.00 2,491,220.00 1,864,796.00 4,703,921.00 20,236,380.00 134,943,311.00 - - - - (NRs.) Grantee Amount 75,655.00 22,000.00 548,868.00 204,894.00 229,822.00 307,770.00 387,826.00 567,787.00 341,521.00 261,649.00 291,264.00 579,083.00 587,027.00 352,144.00 500,804.00 870,105.00 325,035.00 932,398.00 137,544.00 2,054,340.00 1,245,610.00 3,704,460.00 11,886,600.00 44,738,545.00 (NRs.) Amount 697,873.00 782,284.00 679,247.00 428,715.00 454,650.00 454,126.00 293,346.00 255,000.00 187,646.00 932,398.00 999,461.00 138,992.00 1,226,280.00 1,004,570.00 1,222,500.00 1,823,850.00 1,067,120.00 1,037,250.00 1,066,600.00 1,184,240.00 1,312,280.00 1,156,980.00 1,386,060.00 1,217,320.00 2,000,000.00 8,349,780.00 1,245,610.00 90,204,766.00 Project Grant Project

Badki Pakha Mahat Pamka Pamka Kudari Jubitha Jubitha Village Taranga Rampur Tatopani Kalimati Devsthal Odanaku Ranchuli Chhinchu Dillichaur Dillichaur Chilkhaya Chilkhaya Awalching Awalching Hariharpur Hariharpur Chandan Nath Phoi Mahadev Phoi Mahadev

Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet District

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Trader Trader Trader Service Type of Type Provider Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Research Center - Name of Grantee Panikhola Bahuudasya Falful Utpadak Krishak Samuha Raniban Falful Utpadan Krishak Samuha Rara Shau Bebastapan Krishak Samuha Fulful Samuh Tatha Rinmokshya Tarkari Rumtu Gaj Patal Krishak Samuha Ruru Banchu Krishi Sahakari Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Sagarmatha Falful Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Satyadevi Falful Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Srijanshil Krishi Bahudasiya Sahakari Ltd Takurjyu Chuli Krishak Samuha Tila Utpadak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Karnali Falful Tila Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tila Bahu Udasya Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tribeni Krishi Bahuudashaya Sahakary Sanstha Ltd Tripachhaya Unnat Phalful Krishak Samuha Agro Nepal Concern Har Turmeric And Of Ginger Unnat Krishi Kendra (Study On Effect And Marketing On Quality Time vesting Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Himsikhar Shishir Unnat Krishak Samuha Sirjana Nagadebali Krishak Samuha Shishir Unnat Krishak Samuha Mountain Flavor Pvt. Ltd. Organic Prem Smirti Krishi Firm Pashupalan Firm Tatha Resham Krishi Flavour Organic Taranga Bahadur Kathayat Top

PIF PIF PIF SIF ARD ARD Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category Total Value Value Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Apple Chain Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 111 110 112 113 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 S.N.

Page 74 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 717,501.00 632,000.00 974,384.00 934,500.00 643,891.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,608,382.00 1,800,507.00 2,164,507.00 1,394,900.00 1,991,494.00 3,547,500.00 4,079,500.00 2,707,880.00 3,277,500.00 1,344,240.00 2,005,988.00 1,800,165.00 2,583,250.00 1,724,507.00 1,280,000.00 1,077,501.00 1,540,781.00 1,697,443.00 1,256,937.00 2,282,246.00 1,791,989.00 1,285,678.00 1,669,497.00 1,347,513.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 926,116.00 477,625.00 207,800.00 581,202.00 534,408.00 999,435.00 476,175.00 957,724.00 273,800.00 300,898.00 270,025.00 842,500.00 104,400.00 799,625.00 895,740.00 670,806.00 401,049.00 585,352.00 596,127.00 1,165,580.00 1,524,680.00 2,455,120.00 2,780,920.00 1,314,680.00 2,209,620.00 1,257,990.00 1,194,680.00 1,351,840.00 1,082,420.00 (NRs.) Amount 239,876.00 424,200.00 634,927.00 639,827.00 439,976.00 395,465.00 458,325.00 529,827.00 437,500.00 539,491.00 277,876.00 645,041.00 771,327.00 586,131.00 930,406.00 700,326.00 587,077.00 751,386.00 1,027,180.00 1,033,770.00 1,092,380.00 1,298,580.00 1,393,200.00 1,067,880.00 1,070,440.00 1,705,090.00 1,530,140.00 1,325,260.00 1,390,940.00 Project Grant Project Neta Neta Neta Neta Bame Pamka Pamka Pamka Pamka Pamka Village Chande Chande Taranga Taranga Taranga Narayan Mulkhola Satakhani Lekhfarsa Lekhfarsa Lekhfarsa Awalching Awalching Awalching Awalching Hariharpur Hariharpur Majh Kanda Municipality Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Anjuli Krishak Samuha Asal Samudayik Sanstha Krisak Samuha Chandra Surya Bahudeshiya Sahakari Chetanshil Krishi Samuha,Taranga Deurali Masalabali Krishak Samuha Deurali Nagadebali Krishak Samuha Pashupalan Kreshak Samuha Tatha Digo Kreshi Aduwa Biu Samuha Dirghakalin Ekata Krishak Samuha Ganganatha Masalabali Krishak Samuha Harekekada Masalabali Krishak Samuha Hariyali Krishak Samuha,Pampka Hariyali Krishi Bajar Sahakari Sastha Ltd Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Himsikhar Agricultural Coopertive Ltd Jagerti Janadip Multipurpose Coops Janajoti Nagadebali Krishak Samuha Kalbhairab Masala Bali Krishak Samuha Kalika Krishak Samuha Lali Guransh Suntala/Aduwa Utpadan Samuha Milijuli Krishak Samuha Nava Jagriti Mahila Bachat Samuha Krishak Samuha Tarkari Nawalo Kopila Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Organic Masala Utpadan Krishak Samuha Organic Pasupati Bahudhysa Sahakari Sanstha Pokhara Nagadebali Krishaka Samuha Aduwa Utpadan Krishak Samuha Pragatishil Pragatishil Krishak Samuha Surkhet Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Value Value Chain Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 75 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 15,000.00 60,000.00 90,000.00 949,858.00 324,000.00 217,450.00 295,169.00 299,100.00 295,240.00 299,620.00 299,820.00 246,000.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,229,502.00 3,094,727.00 1,618,437.00 3,722,100.00 3,156,020.00 2,587,497.00 2,225,000.00 1,587,234.00 3,487,980.00 1,294,300.00 1,322,501.00 2,318,507.00 1,647,058.00 1,338,700.00 116,306,258.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 792,425.00 779,766.00 360,934.00 439,979.00 856,795.00 930,375.00 460,908.00 718,655.00 2,271,060.00 2,389,640.00 1,159,240.00 1,634,120.00 1,544,500.00 1,799,200.00 1,643,780.00 63,273,361.00 (NRs.) Amount 15,000.00 60,000.00 90,000.00 437,077.00 823,667.00 838,671.00 953,377.00 680,500.00 509,879.00 437,505.00 392,126.00 674,727.00 620,045.00 324,000.00 217,450.00 295,169.00 299,100.00 295,240.00 299,620.00 299,820.00 246,000.00 1,332,460.00 1,996,780.00 1,226,300.00 1,688,780.00 1,186,150.00 53,032,897.00 Project Grant Project

Seri Bame Hanku Sahare Sahare Pamka Pamka Kalche Village Chande Kalimati Devsthal Ramghat Mulkhola Satakhani Lekhfarsa Dharapani Awalching Awalching Awalching Hariharpur Hariharpur Majh Kanda Khadgabada Dhajari Pipal Chandan Nath

Jumla Jumla Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Line agencies Line agencies Line agencies Line agencies - - Name of Grantee Salere Masalabali Krishak Samuha Rin Sahakari Sanstha Tatha Samudayik Bachat Satmul Krishak Samuha Aduwa Bali Krishak Samuh Saya Patri Shishir Unnat Krishak Samuha Aduwa Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Shivasakti Dalit Siddha Samudayak Ban Upabhokta Samuha Simle Krishi Sahakari Sastha Sirjana Nagadebali Krishak Samuha Srijanshil Krishak Samuha,Pampka Arjan Biu Bijan Utpadan Samuha Aya Suntakuri Krishik Samuha Tarparebesi Masalabali Krishak Samuha Telpani Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Ujjal Unna Aduwa Kheti Krishak Samuha Unnat Jat Boar Goat Dlso,Surkhet Improvement Of Rangeland Productivity By Introducing Exotic Spe Surendra Yadav cies,Dr. And Medicat Multi-Nutrient With Performance Of Goats Supplemented ed Urea Blocks Silange Making Dlso, Jumla Dafe Munal Bakhara Palan Samuha Gothikhola Bakhrapalan Krishak Samuha Himalaya Bakhra Palan Samuh Rapti Dalit Samudayak Sastha Rin Sahakari Tatha Arjan Bachat Aya Srijanshil Mahila Bahudeshiya Sahakari Tridevi Bhagwati Misrit Krishak Samuha

PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PPF ARD ARD ARD ARD Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Total Value Value Chain Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger Ginger

143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 S.N.

Page 76 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 10,400.00 293,840.00 254,000.00 254,000.00 295,000.00 294,000.00 245,400.00 295,106.00 295,400.00 252,000.00 293,500.00 242,000.00 274,000.00 297,000.00 250,000.00 274,000.00 290,700.00 260,000.00 290,600.00 247,500.00 266,800.00 242,764.00 298,180.00 295,300.00 247,000.00 241,880.00 254,000.00 260,000.00 298,850.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount (NRs.) Amount 10,400.00 293,840.00 254,000.00 254,000.00 295,000.00 294,000.00 245,400.00 295,106.00 295,400.00 252,000.00 293,500.00 242,000.00 274,000.00 297,000.00 250,000.00 274,000.00 290,700.00 260,000.00 290,600.00 247,500.00 266,800.00 242,764.00 298,180.00 295,300.00 247,000.00 241,880.00 254,000.00 260,000.00 298,850.00 Project Grant Project Gauri Ruma Ruma Sahare Sahare Village Manma Manma Punama Punama Punama Devsthal Sukataya Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Satakhani Satakhani Chauratha Chilkhaya Chilkhaya Dahafatgaun Dhajari Pipal Dhajari Pipal Dhajari Pipal Dhajari Pipal Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot District Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Bheri Bakhra Palan Samuha Bihane Goatfarminggroup Chaur Chaupanne Hariyali Krishak Samuha Cheurela Bakhrapalan Samuha Dadagau Bakhra Palan Samuha COOPERATIVE CREDIT WOMAN SAVING DAUTI STATHAN BIKASH SAMITI PASHUPALAN EKIKRIT BIKASH SAMITI PASHUPALAN EKTA GROUP FARMING FULBARI BUSINESS GOAT SAMUHA PALAN GAIRABARI BAKHRA PROPOSE COOPERATIVE GARAMIN MULTI GROUP PALAN BAKHRA HARIYALI SAMUHA PALAN BAKHRA HARIYALI LIMITED HIMCHULI KIRSHI COOPERATIVE SAMUHA PALAN BAKHRA JAGANATH SAMUHA PALAN JAHARECHOUR BAKHRA KRISHAK SAMULA JANAJAGARAN MISRIT SAMITI SAMUHA BADI MAHILA KALIKA COOPPERAT &CREDIT WOMEN SAVING KHAD DEVI Kot Darbar goat farmer group BALI SAMUHA FULBARI KHADYANNA MAHILA SAMUHA PALAN BAKHRA MALIKA KRISHAK SAMUHA BIU UTPADAN TARKARI MALIKA GROUP FARMING BHALU KHOLAGOAT MATHILLO KRISHAK SAMUHA MISRIT BHAGWATI MAYA SAMUHA PALAN BAKHRA NAMUNA KRISAK SAMUHA FALFUL DALIT PARIBARTANSIL GROUP COMUNITY PRAGATISIL SAMUHA PALAN KUKHURA PRAGATISIL PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF Fund Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 77 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 89,300.00 96,200.00 97,400.00 99,200.00 89,300.00 89,300.00 99,200.00 74,300.00 89,300.00 86,200.00 38,000.00 99,200.00 96,200.00 97,400.00 511,514.00 232,000.00 232,600.00 295,000.00 279,780.00 298,540.00 241,000.00 239,300.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,999,580.00 2,087,630.00 1,446,560.00 1,994,180.00 1,694,040.00 1,452,600.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 30,000.00 55,000.00 43,150.00 48,100.00 48,700.00 49,600.00 43,150.00 43,150.00 49,600.00 35,650.00 43,150.00 43,100.00 19,000.00 49,600.00 48,100.00 48,700.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 (NRs.) Amount 46,150.00 48,100.00 48,700.00 49,600.00 46,150.00 46,150.00 49,600.00 38,650.00 46,150.00 43,100.00 19,000.00 49,600.00 48,100.00 48,700.00 232,000.00 232,600.00 295,000.00 279,780.00 298,540.00 241,000.00 239,300.00 481,514.00 1,999,580.00 1,987,630.00 1,346,560.00 1,994,180.00 1,694,040.00 1,397,600.00 Project Grant Project Seri Gela Bharta Village Taranga Narayan Devsthal Mugraha Jagatipur Agragaun Satakhani Kunathari Kunathari Kunathari Dharapani Bhairabstan Lekhparajul Majh Kanda Khadgabada Khadgabada Khadgabada Babiyachaur Turmakhand Municipality Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Birendranagar Birendranagar Kupinde Daha Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Line agencies Line agencies Line agencies Market Center Market Center Slaughter house Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee PRAGATISIL MAHILA BAKHRA PALAN SAMUHA PALAN BAKHRA MAHILA PRAGATISIL Rapti Dalit Samudayak Sastha Sagarmatha Bakhra Palan Samuha Saraswati Krishak Samuha Pashu Palan Krishak Samuha Tatha Siddhachuli Mahila Krishi Agriculture & Livestock Sunpal Thulo Samudayak Ban Upbhokta Samuha Babiyachaur Gaubikas Samitee (Vdc) Jilla Pashu Sewa Karyalaya, Surkhet Vdc Khasi Boka Sankalan Kendra, Kunathari Narayan Nagarpalika,Dailekh Pasu Quarantine Office Nepalgunj Laboratory Veterinary Regional Bahudeshiya Sahakari Tridevi Abiraj Shahi Ashish Shahi Ashok Koirala Bhawani Prasad Bhattarai Bibash Shahi Bir Bahadur B.K. Bc Bir Bdr. Chakra Bahadur Khatri Chandra Bahadur Shahi Chandra Bdr Kangmung Chitra Bahadur Darlami Dal Bahadur Oli Dhan Bahadur Budha Dhan Bahadur Khatri PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 211 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 S.N.

Page 78 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 74,300.00 96,200.00 96,200.00 89,300.00 99,200.00 89,300.00 89,300.00 78,300.00 89,300.00 89,300.00 89,300.00 99,200.00 99,200.00 99,200.00 89,300.00 41,000.00 119,300.00 317,721.00 124,300.00 102,800.00 649,247.00 135,100.00 185,440.00 283,400.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 4,084,140.00 2,084,054.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 35,650.00 60,650.00 48,100.00 48,100.00 43,150.00 49,900.00 49,600.00 43,150.00 87,990.00 43,150.00 39,150.00 43,150.00 43,150.00 43,150.00 49,600.00 49,600.00 49,600.00 43,150.00 20,500.00 58,150.00 203,491.00 499,938.00 104,800.00 185,450.00 2,159,570.00 1,251,360.00 (NRs.) Amount 38,650.00 63,650.00 48,100.00 48,100.00 46,150.00 52,900.00 49,600.00 46,150.00 30,300.00 97,450.00 46,150.00 39,150.00 97,950.00 46,150.00 46,150.00 46,150.00 49,600.00 49,600.00 49,600.00 46,150.00 20,500.00 61,150.00 114,230.00 149,309.00 832,694.00 1,924,570.00 Project Grant Project Seri Tosi Lahai Bharta Jubitha Village Manma Mugraha Khalanga Meheltoli Meheltoli Mulkhola Chhinchu Agragaun Kunathari Majh Kanda Khadgabada Khadgabada Babiyachaur Turmakhand Turmakhand Municipality Municipality Birendranagar Birendranagar Kupinde Daha Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Dharma Raj Khadka Bahadur Salami Durga Ganja Man Budha Gayatri Nepali Gobardhan Kami Gopal Bahadur Bayak Indra Bahadur Singh Janak Raj Regmi Surkhet And Supplier, Jb Meat Sales Jeet Bahadur Shahi Jeevan Khadka Jhuparam Khadka Keshab Bahadur Rawal Krishna Bahadur Khadka Ahadur Chalaune Lal B Laxmi Bakhra Palan Udyog Laxmi Kumari Regmi Lila Ram Neupane Lokendra Bayak Manoj Kumar Shahi Nanada Raj Oli Phankha Bahadur Mahatara Prakash Panday Pushpa Shahi Raju Kumari Bhandari Sabitri Kumari Khadka Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 79 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 60,500.00 74,300.00 84,000.00 89,300.00 78,300.00 119,300.00 611,993.00 180,455.00 643,540.00 953,664.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 2,886,000.00 2,178,581.00 3,278,996.00 1,543,906.00 1,906,369.00 1,714,398.00 1,090,509.00 1,676,705.00 2,020,903.00 1,538,466.00 1,077,277.00 1,034,192.00 2,755,550.00 1,944,670.00 1,041,027.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 28,750.00 35,650.00 42,000.00 58,150.00 43,150.00 39,150.00 611,378.00 127,727.00 321,770.00 194,497.00 255,017.00 528,456.00 491,379.00 290,166.00 632,105.00 405,983.00 496,806.00 364,351.00 352,714.00 691,470.00 404,656.00 1,443,000.00 1,274,540.00 2,279,340.00 1,056,720.00 (NRs.) Amount 31,750.00 38,650.00 52,728.00 42,000.00 61,150.00 46,150.00 39,150.00 904,041.00 321,770.00 999,656.00 417,496.00 698,647.00 800,343.00 712,926.00 681,478.00 636,371.00 1,443,000.00 1,015,450.00 1,414,990.00 1,103,020.00 1,044,600.00 1,614,920.00 1,041,660.00 1,698,830.00 1,253,200.00 Project Grant Project Ratu Bhairi Sahare Malika Village Devsthal Devsthal Malarani Khalanga Sinhasain Agragaun Agragaun Satakhani Hariharpur Kalikathum Bhairabstan Bhairabstan Bhairabstan Majh Kanda Majh Kanda Khadgabada Khadgabada Municipality Birendranagar Kupinde Daha Kupinde Daha Gadi Bayalkada Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Center Center Center Center Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Goat Resource Goat Resource Goat Resource Goat Resource Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Sambridhi Namuna Pashu Tatha Krishi Udhyog Tatha Sambridhi Namuna Pashu Sharada Sunar Shisir Kumar Thapa Shramjibi Pashupalan Udyog Sita Kumari Shahi Star Biu Bijan Suppliers Sukdev Poudel Utpadan Shrot Kendra Tarkari Tatha Sungava Bakhrapalan Ram Shahi Tika Bahadur Bc Top Bahadur Thapa Yam Agrigaun Badi Mahila Samuha Badalekh Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Pashupalan Sahakari Tatha Badokhola Krishi Bageshori Fruit Group Basanta Swablmban Krisk Samuha Rin Sahakari Tatha Bayaldhunga Bachat Bibekshil Bahudeshiya Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Bindrasaini Goat Production Committee Chandrasurya Samajik Bahumukhi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Chaupari Bakhra Krishak Samuha Chautari Bakhra Palan Samuha And Credit Cooperatives Ltd. Chetana Saving Dafe Munal Bakhara Palan Samuha Aguwa Krishak Samuha, Goat Dalit Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 S.N.

Page 80 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 253,500.00 308,167.00 981,462.00 321,500.00 464,767.00 542,167.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 2,337,111.00 2,403,032.00 2,854,200.00 3,942,370.00 1,129,505.00 1,171,556.00 2,753,270.00 2,108,855.00 1,644,590.00 1,815,159.00 2,091,715.00 1,509,501.00 3,801,280.00 3,032,750.00 2,458,743.00 2,230,774.00 1,314,620.00 1,183,806.00 1,291,431.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 37,575.00 45,775.00 47,775.00 69,775.00 80,875.00 611,940.00 843,492.00 379,671.00 425,995.00 850,625.00 628,939.00 598,891.00 702,175.00 494,771.00 756,823.00 284,887.00 859,944.00 392,988.00 453,341.00 219,291.00 1,238,110.00 1,056,890.00 2,071,790.00 1,051,350.00 1,805,200.00 (NRs.) Amount 749,834.00 745,561.00 215,925.00 262,392.00 696,575.00 273,725.00 921,632.00 730,465.00 394,992.00 461,292.00 1,559,540.00 1,797,310.00 1,870,580.00 1,701,920.00 1,258,230.00 1,032,650.00 1,186,220.00 1,738,220.00 1,389,540.00 1,014,730.00 1,996,080.00 1,794,640.00 1,701,920.00 1,370,830.00 1,072,140.00 Project Grant Project Gela Dhapa Chapre Chapre Jubitha Village Malarani Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Chhinchu Sinhasain Kunathari Kunathari Dharapani Dharapani Dharapani Nigalchula Bajedichaur Lekhparajul Khadgabada Babiyachaur Turmakhand Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Birendranagar Birendranagar Jumla Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh District Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Darimpata Mahila Bakhara Palan Samuuha Dego Bikas Krishi Sahakari Sastha Ltd Dhanbot Bahudeshaya Sahakari Pashupalan Sahakri Sastha Tatha Didibahini Krishi Pashupalan Samuha Tatha Dip Bhabar Krishi Krishi Sahakari Sastha Tatha Fewa Pashupalan Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Fulbari Gothikhola Bakhrapalan Krishak Samuha Gurash Bakhra Palan Samuha Hariyali Bakha Palan Krishak Samuha Khalnga Hariyali Bakhra Palan Samuha,Surkhet Hariyali Bhakra Palan Krishak Samuha,Jubitha Pashupalan Mahila Krishak Samuh Tatha Hariyali Krishi Himalaya Bakhra Palan Samuh Pashu Bahudasya Sahakari Sanstha Tatha Himali Krishi Pashupalan Sahakari Sastha Ltd Tatha Himchule Krishi Jaganath Coop- Goat, Lekhparajul Jana Sarokar Bakhra Palan Samuha Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Janachetana Bachat Janaki Krishi Samuh Janapirya Bahudasya Sahakari Sanstha Aalu Utpadan Mahila Krishak Samuha, Goat Multivc Jharana Joli Mughra Pasu Sewa Samuha Jurichula Bakhra Palan Samuh Jurimalika Bakhra Palan Samuh Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 81 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks Total Total 792,930.00 409,500.00 397,500.00 943,080.00 349,500.00 341,500.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 2,632,818.00 1,728,682.00 3,099,180.00 2,187,200.00 1,195,057.00 1,757,219.00 4,202,860.00 2,786,370.00 2,369,032.00 1,163,381.00 1,047,415.00 1,256,663.00 2,089,946.00 1,547,571.00 1,145,079.00 1,086,581.00 1,604,943.00 2,342,345.00 1,986,318.00 2,547,688.00 1,757,102.00 1,797,645.00 1,306,384.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 60,975.00 59,175.00 51,975.00 50,775.00 847,988.00 259,302.00 672,360.00 302,719.00 624,919.00 190,054.00 872,072.00 420,295.00 322,130.00 396,489.00 720,606.00 272,591.00 437,504.00 346,412.00 475,503.00 815,145.00 280,145.00 743,238.00 865,578.00 582,242.00 603,885.00 509,080.00 1,243,060.00 2,304,340.00 1,124,060.00 (NRs.) Amount 892,338.00 602,876.00 743,086.00 725,285.00 860,174.00 707,575.00 740,169.00 348,525.00 338,325.00 662,935.00 797,304.00 297,525.00 290,725.00 1,682,110.00 1,784,830.00 1,469,380.00 1,856,120.00 1,514,840.00 1,132,300.00 1,898,520.00 1,662,310.00 1,496,960.00 1,369,340.00 1,274,980.00 1,129,440.00 1,527,200.00 1,243,080.00 1,174,860.00 1,193,760.00 Project Grant Project Lahai Guthu Bharta Sahare Matela Village Manma Manma Punama Mugraha Jagatipur Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Kunathari Dillichaur Badalamji Chilkhaya Lekhparajul Khadgabada Khadgabada Khadgabada Dahafatgaun Dada Parajul Kupinde Daha Kanakasundari Naule Katuwal Jumla Jumla Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot District Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Kalika Bakhra Palan Samuha Kalika Commercial Goot Famining Group Kalika Swablamban Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Karnali Ekikrit Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Karnali Mahila Bachat Khaharepakha Bakhra Palan Krisak Samuha Kotkhola Jadibuti Utpadak Sahakari, Goat Aicho Paicho Bahudasya Sahakari Sanst Krishana Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Kupindedaha Bachat Laligunransha Goat Mul Samitee- Lekhparajul Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Laxmi Devi Bachat Falful Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Lekali Mahadev Bakhra Palan Samuha Mahadev Bhakrapalan Krishak Samuha Tharmali Samuha Mahila Bakhra Paicho Mahila Bikash Krishak Samuha Mahila Jagaran Samajik Bahudasya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Malika Bakhra Palan Samuha Pashu Palan Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Malika Krishi Mastanarayan Krishi Bahumukhi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Maya Bhagwati Misrit Krishak Samuha Milan Bakhara Pasupalan Samuha Pashupalan Sahakari Sastha Ltd Tatha Nagarek Krishi Naineladeba Bhakrapalan Samuha Bhakrapalan Samuha Newrghatmathi Nirman Krishak Samuha Pahadi Bhakrapalan Krishak Samuha Bheri Milika Paribartanshil Bakhra Palan Samuh Paribartansil Dalit Falful Krisak Samuha Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Value Value Chain 311 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 S.N.

Page 82 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 367,500.00 955,480.00 345,000.00 477,750.00 500,000.00 576,737.00 869,000.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,346,801.00 2,266,463.00 1,598,187.00 1,987,149.00 1,098,052.00 2,873,150.00 1,380,194.00 1,656,865.00 1,479,212.00 2,063,765.00 2,621,157.00 1,735,109.00 2,800,552.00 2,502,530.00 3,225,150.00 1,354,418.00 1,262,244.00 1,724,465.00 1,444,812.00 193,936,321.00 - - - (NRs.) Grantee Amount 54,675.00 202,021.00 918,183.00 318,127.00 424,609.00 259,781.00 515,168.00 281,575.00 226,382.00 428,565.00 835,387.00 617,619.00 955,712.00 354,358.00 300,890.00 419,253.00 687,465.00 264,582.00 140,500.00 509,000.00 1,011,240.00 1,052,110.00 1,138,670.00 62,449,801.00 (NRs.) Amount 838,271.00 865,026.00 312,825.00 654,590.00 842,991.00 345,000.00 477,750.00 500,000.00 436,237.00 360,000.00 1,117,490.00 1,144,780.00 1,348,280.00 1,280,060.00 1,562,540.00 1,734,480.00 1,375,290.00 1,252,830.00 1,635,200.00 1,785,770.00 1,844,840.00 1,491,290.00 2,173,040.00 1,000,060.00 1,037,000.00 1,180,230.00 Project Grant Project 131,486,520.00

Seri Tosi Lahai Bhoor Baraha Rakam Village Manma Narayan Khalanga Meheltoli Chhinchu Satakhani Kunathari Kunathari Chilkhaya Bhairabstan Kalikakhetu Majh Kanda Khadgabada Turmakhand Turmakhand Turmakhand Municipality

Jumla Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot District Achham Achham Achham Achham Achham

T R D D D Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Pipiltakura Samudayak Ban Samuha Pragatishil Krishak Samuha,Achham,Turmakhad Agriculture Cooperative Pragatishil Pipal Chautari Agriculture Multipurpose Cooperative Rular Safalta Samajik Udhami Mahila Sahakari Sanstha Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Sahayogi Hatemalo Bachat Salleri Bhakhra Palan Krishak Samuha Samaj Jagarn Goat Keeping Kirshak Group Samjhana Bhaisi Palan Samuha Siddhapaila Goat Committee Rin Sahakari Tatha Arjan Bachat Aya Srijanshil Mahila Pashupalan Cooperative Tatha Apangita Krihsi Srijanshil Samudayik Sundaradevi Samudayak Krishak Samuha Ren Sahakari Sastha Ltd Tatha Suryadaya Bandali Batch Thulo Samudayak Ban Upbhokta Samuha Bahudeshiya Sahakari Tridevi Bakhrapalan Samuha Tripurasundari Upahar Samajik Udhami Mahila Sahakari Sanstha Vheri Samudayak Mahila Bahudshya Saakari Sastha Ltd Nagarek Krishak Samuha Yoba Krishi Sahakary Sanstha Ltd Yuva Amit Khanal Deuti Engineering Service Center Eagriculture Janjyoti Higher Secondary School Naf Seeds Pvt Ltd

ARD ARD ARD ARD ARD Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat Goat OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Goat Total Value Value Chain

331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 83 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 7,759.00 3,000.00 52,263.00 75,000.00 15,000.00 75,000.00 29,261.00 30,000.00 70,000.00 29,600.00 70,000.00 236,250.00 499,000.00 172,834.00 170,750.00 268,406.00 299,332.00 229,330.00 185,033.00 183,550.00 299,128.00 230,190.00 264,043.00 291,654.00 250,000.00 194,000.00 221,200.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 84,875.00

(NRs.) 7,759.00 3,000.00 Amount 52,263.00 75,000.00 15,000.00 75,000.00 29,261.00 30,000.00 70,000.00 29,600.00 70,000.00 151,375.00 499,000.00 172,834.00 170,750.00 268,406.00 299,332.00 229,330.00 185,033.00 183,550.00 299,128.00 230,190.00 264,043.00 291,654.00 250,000.00 194,000.00 221,200.00 Project Grant Project Bhoor Bhoor Bhoor Village Manma Manma Punama Punama Raniban Raniban Raniban Latikoili Latikoili Latikoili Badalkot Jagatipur Gamaudi Maintada Khalanga Chhinchu Bhairabstan Municipality Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot District Achham Achham Achham Achham D D Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative - Name of Grantee Naya Krishi Abhiyan Krishi Farm Naya Krishi Pvt.Ltd, Kathmandu Technologies Pathway Banjhadi Krishak Samuha Gramin Krishi Bikas Samuha Kheti Krisak Samuha,Bhoor Tarkari Hariyali Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Janasakti Laliguras Krishak Samuha ,Achham Naretapar Krishi Bahumukhi Sahakari Sastha Pragatisil Mahila Krisak Samuha Jajarkot Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Surya Kiran Badakhola Khubu Farmers Group Bar Pipal Krishak Samuha Baratu Mahila Udhami Krishak Samuha Utpadan Krasak Samuha Tarkari Basantawada Bashghari Krishak Samuha Dharapani Farmer Group Dhrubatara Saving & Credit Cooperatives Ltd. Farmer Group Vegatable Eber Agriculture & Livestock Cooperative, Jarbutta- Gagre Women Gagretal tal , Latikoile Tilpur Intretgated Pest Management Coopearative Janchetana Krishi Coop Farmer Group Veg Jwala Frash Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Laliguras Production Group Vegetable Milan Chock Fresh Agriculture & Cooperative Nari Ekata Utpadan Kirshak Samuha Tarkari Acharaya Navajoyti Mahila Krishak Samuha Pargatisil PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PIF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF ARD ARD Fund Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 S.N.

Page 84 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 5,660.00 193,110.00 194,100.00 156,752.00 107,400.00 214,600.00 104,500.00 143,250.00 246,000.00 636,975.00 700,459.00 836,656.00 103,500.00 166,000.00 Sub-Project Cost (NRs.) 1,382,116.00 1,443,790.00 1,047,966.00 1,996,090.00 4,300,730.00 1,600,000.00 2,085,858.00 1,965,564.00 1,917,665.00 2,949,000.00 3,968,780.00 41,793,600.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 93,241.00 54,250.00 83,000.00 178,640.00 174,806.00 420,000.00 105,069.00 126,023.00 369,478.00 306,874.00 286,825.00 4,742,000.00 2,300,730.00 1,949,500.00 1,984,390.00 (NRs.) 5,660.00 Amount 49,250.00 83,000.00 193,110.00 194,100.00 156,752.00 107,400.00 214,600.00 104,500.00 143,250.00 246,000.00 954,725.00 636,975.00 595,390.00 710,633.00 999,500.00 1,265,150.00 1,207,310.00 1,996,090.00 2,000,000.00 1,180,000.00 1,716,380.00 1,658,690.00 1,630,840.00 1,984,390.00 37,051,600.00 Project Grant Project Salkot Salkot Jarbuta Village Manma Manma Manma Punama Punama Punama Binayak Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Chhinchu Mulkhola Chhinchu Kunathari Awal Parajul Awal Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Pokharikanda Pokharikanda Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh District Achham CCI CCI CCI Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Service Service Type of Type Provider Provider Grantees Cooperative Market Center Name of Grantee Pragatisil Farmers Group Pragatisil Mahila Krisak Samuha Jajarkot Krisak Samuha Tarkari Pragatisil Production Group Vegetable Puja Malika Mahila Farmer Group Vegetable Season Radhakirshna Off Samabesi Mahila Multi-Cooperatives Ltd. Production Group Vegetable Samjhana Production Group Vegetable Shrijansil Fresh Farmers Group Tribeni Bar Pipal Krishak Samuha Agri Products Market Bulbule Regional Aaya Arjan Ekta Krishak Samuha Biu Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Taja Himalayan Jilla Krishi Bikash Karyalaye, Surkhet Kalikot Uddhot Banijya Sangh Surkhet Uddhog Banijye Sangh, Bar Pipal Krishak Samuha Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Taja Bemausami Aaya Arjan Ekta Krishak Samuha Jyamere Maurepalan Krishak Samuha Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Laliguras Krisak Samuha Tarkari Pragatisil Pasal Acharya Tarkari Aibhan Budha Asha Shahi Babu & Shahi Sabji Mandi SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF SDF Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 85 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 92,850.00 73,350.00 72,850.00 48,000.00 70,350.00 73,350.00 211,500.00 127,350.00 250,500.00 103,500.00 106,000.00 146,851.00 240,592.00 106,000.00 107,475.00 189,500.00 137,500.00 488,000.00 159,050.00 299,951.00 103,500.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 2,857,000.00 8,203,300.00 4,769,940.00 3,227,000.00 110,522,000.00 - (NRs.) Grantee Amount 63,675.00 44,925.00 53,500.00 35,175.00 56,000.00 73,425.00 34,925.00 24,000.00 56,000.00 94,750.00 35,175.00 68,750.00 79,525.00 35,175.00 54,250.00 163,000.00 120,296.00 105,750.00 244,000.00 149,975.00 1,858,500.00 4,755,150.00 2,839,070.00 2,228,500.00 60,522,000.00 (NRs.) Amount 63,675.00 47,925.00 87,500.00 50,000.00 38,175.00 50,000.00 73,426.00 37,925.00 24,000.00 50,000.00 94,750.00 35,175.00 68,750.00 79,525.00 38,175.00 49,250.00 998,500.00 120,296.00 105,750.00 107,475.00 244,000.00 149,976.00 998,500.00 3,448,150.00 1,930,870.00 50,000,000.00 Project Grant Project Seri Seri Gela Village Manma Manma Manma Manma Pagnath Binayak Raniban Narayan Badalkot Khalanga Khalanga Awalching Bhairabstan Dasarathpur Babiyachaur Dahafatgaun Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Kupinde Daha Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham Trader Trader Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Cold Storage Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Bam Falful Tatha Sabji Mandi Tatha Bam Falful Bhabi Devkota Bhawana Rana Bir Bahadur Basnet Chirenjibi Sharma Dadiram Budha Devkota Sabji Mandi Dhan Bahadur Karki Dhole Gharti Gagan Bahadur Saru Ganesh Rokaya Goma Adhikari Hem Raj Giri Himali Suppliers Indra Bahadur Shahi Jeevan Roka Karnali Cold Chain Logistics Pvt. Ltd Madhav Prasad Neupane Mamata Devkota Man Bahadur Bayak Manma Agrovet Center, Milan Min Prasad Jaisi Nama Raj Majhi Nim Prasad Budha Pasal Tarkari Pandey Khadey Tatha Parbananda Pandey Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 411 410 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 S.N.

Page 86 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 72,850.00 72,850.00 127,349.00 142,000.00 106,000.00 106,000.00 212,000.00 882,397.00 641,851.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 4,700,000.00 3,089,060.00 1,593,461.00 1,404,094.00 1,651,693.00 1,141,883.00 1,736,515.00 1,790,076.00 1,313,948.00 2,392,150.00 2,357,499.00 1,207,920.00 1,545,476.00 2,427,209.00 1,461,681.00 2,578,549.00 1,876,785.00 1,519,348.00 1,069,651.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 63,675.00 69,500.00 56,000.00 34,925.00 56,000.00 37,925.00 670,110.00 106,000.00 299,551.00 253,944.00 342,193.00 355,200.00 300,815.00 310,406.00 238,988.00 375,549.00 222,009.00 280,086.00 435,569.00 314,351.00 725,939.00 345,865.00 286,528.00 172,697.00 120,620.00 189,900.00 2,782,500.00 1,544,530.00 (NRs.) Amount 63,674.00 72,500.00 50,000.00 37,925.00 50,000.00 34,925.00 985,911.00 106,000.00 786,683.00 709,700.00 521,231.00 879,751.00 1,917,500.00 1,544,530.00 1,293,910.00 1,150,150.00 1,309,500.00 1,435,700.00 1,479,670.00 1,074,960.00 1,722,040.00 1,981,950.00 1,265,390.00 1,991,640.00 1,147,330.00 1,852,610.00 1,530,920.00 1,232,820.00 Project Grant Project Salkot Salkot Sahare Village Manma Pagnath Pagnath Binayak Raniban Pipalkot Pipalkot Mugraha Badalkot Badalkot Badalkot Rawatkot Mulkhola Mulkhola Chhinchu Bhairabstan Babiyachaur Babiyachaur Dahafatgaun Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Pokharikanda Birendranagar Birendranagar Kupinde Daha Rakam Karnali Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham - Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader ing unit Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Manure Process Name of Grantee Pramod Kumar Pulami Puja Sabje Mandi Pushpa Raj Timilsena Raj Kumar Bc Sarita Kumari Shahi Giri Tara Bahadur Sherestha Tej The Green City Sanitation Sewa Bahadur Budha Tunga Aalukhet Kirsak Samuha Rin Sahakari Sasthan Limited Tatha Ama Bachat Phalful Utpadan Krishak, Samuha Tatha Tarkari Taja Babedi Badakhola Khubu Farmers Group Bagaura Krishak Samuha Bahuprativasali Krshi Samuha Bangada Krishi Sahakari Sastha Ltd Banjhadi Krishak Samuha Bar Pipal Krishak Samuha Baratu Mahila Udhami Krishak Samuha Utpadan Krasak Samuha Tarkari Basantawada Basundhara Krishi Sahakari Sastha Batika Ful Bahudshya Krishak Samuha Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Taja Bemausami Bhabar Krishi Sahakari Sastha Ltd Falful Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Bhabar Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Bhagwati Bhairab Bhakrapalan Mahila Krishak Samuha Bheri Mahila Krishak Samuh Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 87 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 396,049.00 804,650.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,137,982.00 1,345,350.00 3,031,480.00 1,975,270.00 1,731,594.00 2,498,980.00 1,308,800.00 1,271,156.00 2,618,865.00 1,183,997.00 1,313,010.00 1,665,353.00 2,162,316.00 2,257,821.00 1,829,974.00 2,081,464.00 1,192,395.00 1,933,958.00 2,215,741.00 2,507,752.00 2,360,172.00 3,303,750.00 2,060,050.00 1,853,537.00 1,853,205.00 1,216,600.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 59,407.00 207,920.00 235,910.00 327,670.00 325,274.00 598,130.00 209,280.00 212,356.00 618,865.00 240,124.00 409,526.00 297,653.00 164,150.00 546,276.00 365,591.00 343,244.00 395,884.00 214,854.00 319,528.00 452,361.00 507,752.00 705,592.00 505,540.00 483,997.00 359,905.00 182,490.00 1,037,270.00 1,303,750.00 (NRs.) Amount 930,062.00 943,873.00 903,484.00 336,642.00 640,500.00 977,541.00 1,034,110.00 1,109,440.00 1,994,210.00 1,647,600.00 1,406,320.00 1,900,850.00 1,099,520.00 1,058,800.00 2,000,000.00 1,367,700.00 1,616,040.00 1,892,230.00 1,486,730.00 1,685,580.00 1,614,430.00 1,763,380.00 2,000,000.00 1,654,580.00 2,000,000.00 1,554,510.00 1,369,540.00 1,493,300.00 Project Grant Project Piladi Bhoor Salkot Salkot Village Manma Pagnath Punama Raniban Narayan Narayan Devsthal Malarani Jagatipur Mulkhola Dillichaur Dillichaur Dillichaur Goganpani Uttarganga Dasarathpur Dasarathpur Badabhairab Babiyachaur Dahafatgaun Chhumchaur Municipality Municipality Dhajari Pipal Pokharikanda Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Bhermauri Taja Tarkari Tatha Biu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Taja Bhermauri Mahila Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Bihani Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Aapkholi Taja Bishnu Utpadad Krisak Samooh Tarkari Chetanshil Mahila Bachat Dashrathpur Krishak Samuha Devstal Khambadanda Krishak Samuha Pashu Palan Sahakari Sanstha Tatha Dipjyoti Mahila Bikash Krishi Ltd Krishak Samuha Tarkari Dungristhan Taja Aaya Arjan Ekta Krishak Samuha Fulbari Krishak Samuha Fulbari Krishak Samuha,Dillichaur,Jumla Gatishil Mahila Krishak Samuha Ghumkhola Pragatisil Bahuddeshiya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Gramin Krishi Bikas Samuha Alu Utpadan Samuh Griha Laxmi Guru Mahadev Krishi Sahakari Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Gyan Jyoti Pashupalan Samuha Tatha Hariyalai Krishi Hariyali Ghar Bagaicha Sahakari Sastha Ltd. Kheti Krisak Samuha,Bhoor Tarkari Hariyali Kheti Krisak Samuha,Punma Tarkari Hariyali Thata Jadibuti Bikash Coop Hariyo Hira Kirshi Pashupalan Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Hatemalo Krishi Biu Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Taja Himalayan Alu Utpadak Krishak Samuh Himali Himali Bhakhrapalan Krishak Samuha Utpadan Kirsak Samuha Tarkari Taja Himali Agriculture Multipurpose Cooperative Himsikhar Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 S.N.

Page 88 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 543,585.00 972,213.00 583,160.00 781,601.00 933,874.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 2,113,038.00 1,283,605.00 2,192,638.00 1,017,001.00 2,397,618.00 1,064,276.00 1,694,918.00 2,254,626.00 1,396,764.00 1,600,512.00 1,000,486.00 1,919,471.00 2,228,517.00 1,802,717.00 2,438,948.00 1,214,164.00 1,173,313.00 1,365,706.00 1,370,654.00 1,593,775.00 1,247,280.00 2,739,818.00 1,281,412.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 81,539.00 87,474.00 323,311.00 457,118.00 201,725.00 696,308.00 199,464.00 225,665.00 319,558.00 419,026.00 272,314.00 269,512.00 182,772.00 507,921.00 179,925.00 593,787.00 177,883.00 270,407.00 524,968.00 253,958.00 216,334.00 327,016.00 568,978.00 247,494.00 290,105.00 232,680.00 574,198.00 192,212.00 (NRs.) Amount 960,294.00 462,046.00 815,276.00 864,812.00 746,548.00 495,686.00 817,714.00 601,676.00 755,991.00 960,206.00 956,979.00 1,411,550.00 1,735,520.00 1,701,310.00 1,375,360.00 1,835,600.00 1,124,450.00 1,331,000.00 1,634,730.00 1,532,310.00 1,913,980.00 1,038,690.00 1,544,060.00 1,123,160.00 1,303,670.00 1,014,600.00 2,165,620.00 1,089,200.00 Project Grant Project Seri Gauri Piladi Bhoor Layati Salkot Rupha Baraha Kalyan Village Manma Punama Pagnath Patmara Patmara Raniban Narayan Latikoili Badalkot Khalanga Sinhasain Lalikanda Lekhgaun Bindrasaini Bhairabstan Dahafatgaun Municipality Dada Parajul Pokharikanda Rakam Karnali Jumla Jumla Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Jana Ekta Bachat Tatha Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Jana Ekta Bachat Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Jana Sewak Bachat Phalphul Kirsak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Janapraymi Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Janasakti Janchetana Krishi Samuha,Lekhgaun Pasupalan Sanshta Tatha Jivanrekha Krashi Jyamere Maurepalan Krishak Samuha Agriculture Multipurpose Cooperative Kaketra Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Karelawat Karnali Bahudeshya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Mahila Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Karnali Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tajatarkari Kisan Kalyan Rin Krishak Samuha Tatha Kopila Bachat Alu Mahila Krishak Samuha Kunthabada Biu Laliguras Krishak Samuha ,Achham Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Laliguras Utpadak Samuha Tarkari Taja Laligurash Agriculture Multipurpose Cooperative Lalikanda Lamstada Krishak Samuha Utpadan Krishak, Samuha Tarkari Tatha Lasi Phalful Pashupalan Sahakari Sastha Tatha Lawna Krishi Biu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Taja Laxmi Mahadev Biu Bank Samuha Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Mahadev Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Mahila Utthan Utpadan Krishi Samuha Tarkari Mailmilap Malchari Multipal Cooprative Ltd Salkot Agriculture Multi Cooperative Manikapur Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 511 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 89 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 425,633.00 717,315.00 631,291.00 720,266.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,586,413.00 2,041,507.00 2,470,515.00 1,454,006.00 2,955,578.00 3,628,083.00 1,458,069.00 1,850,010.00 1,371,320.00 1,446,306.00 2,100,190.00 1,218,658.00 1,922,282.00 1,799,714.00 1,749,108.00 1,763,094.00 1,034,920.00 1,879,174.00 1,647,480.00 1,907,525.00 1,193,524.00 1,881,000.00 1,623,229.00 1,317,347.00 1,334,754.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 434,493.00 521,737.00 470,605.00 275,606.00 104,175.00 107,597.00 957,258.00 304,009.00 502,880.00 292,690.00 216,946.00 260,450.00 229,810.00 333,352.00 310,294.00 325,738.00 283,714.00 195,159.00 146,768.00 315,984.00 253,590.00 512,925.00 223,155.00 353,600.00 286,779.00 246,777.00 200,214.00 125,015.00 2,783,480.00 (NRs.) Amount 321,458.00 609,718.00 844,603.00 988,848.00 839,761.00 484,523.00 970,369.00 595,251.00 1,151,920.00 1,519,770.00 1,999,910.00 1,178,400.00 1,998,320.00 1,154,060.00 1,347,130.00 1,078,630.00 1,229,360.00 1,839,740.00 1,588,930.00 1,489,420.00 1,423,370.00 1,479,380.00 1,563,190.00 1,393,890.00 1,394,600.00 1,527,400.00 1,336,450.00 1,070,570.00 1,134,540.00 Project Grant Project Gela Piladi Salkot Bharta Sahare Village Manma Manma Manma Punama Patmara Patmara Binayak Latikoili Devsthal Devsthal Badalkot Jagatipur Khalanga BAYALA Satakhani Lalikanda Dillichaur Dasarathpur Majh Kanda Chhumchaur Municipality Pokharikanda Pokharikanda Birendranagar Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Salyan Salyan Salyan Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Kalikot Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh District Achham Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Masta Phalphul Thata Tarkari Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Thata Masta Phalphul Milijuli Bakhra Palan Samuh Production Group Vegetable Milijuli Mulpani Krishi Utpadan Samuha Nabin Samaj Sundar Krisak Samuha Prod. Group Veg. Namunalaxmi Naretapar Krishi Bahumukhi Sahakari Sastha Production Group Vegetable Nauloshrijana Utpadan Kirshak Samuha Tarkari Acharaya Navajoyti Biu Utpadan Samuha Tatha Alu Navjoti Utpadan Krishak, Samuha Tarkari Naya Karnali Agriculture Cooprative Ltd Bidyapur Pantadi Ranipata Krishak Samuha Pipal Chautari Krishak Samuha Falful Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Pipal Chautari Pragatishil Krishi Samuha,Salkot,Surkhet Biu Utpadan Samuha Tatha Tarkari Taja Pragatishil Pragatisil Mahila Krisak Samuha Jajarkot Pragatisil Mahila Krishak Group Krisak Samuha Tarkari Pragatisil Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Radha Krishana Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Radha Krishna Alu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Safal Biu Rin Sahakari Tatha Sagarmatha Mahila Bachat Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Tatha Saladanda Badriganu Falful Samabesi Mahila Multi-Cooperatives Ltd. Samjhana Krishi Samuha Agriculture Multipal Cooperative Sanosurkhet Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tajatarkari Sarsawati Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Value Value Chain 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 S.N.

Page 90 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Project Total Sub- Total 421,133.00 938,584.00 394,099.00 718,995.00 Cost (NRs.) 1,115,552.00 1,803,456.00 1,302,726.00 1,377,604.00 1,592,515.00 2,368,405.00 1,103,975.00 1,431,536.00 2,686,000.00 1,920,259.00 2,151,007.00 1,065,402.00 1,988,796.00 1,525,092.00 1,318,401.00 2,240,304.00 2,072,756.00 1,068,305.00 2,433,281.00 1,068,245.00 1,155,101.00 1,330,235.00 428,524,781.00 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 62,765.00 211,845.00 340,516.00 167,333.00 222,326.00 101,925.00 256,734.00 173,067.00 258,655.00 615,055.00 130,749.00 186,136.00 268,596.00 860,000.00 376,759.00 402,177.00 193,060.00 324,756.00 288,292.00 245,881.00 504,554.00 507,446.00 205,536.00 526,361.00 178,262.00 199,535.00 138,603,139.00 (NRs.) Amount 948,219.00 319,208.00 765,517.00 331,334.00 588,246.00 917,839.00 872,342.00 862,769.00 889,983.00 943,256.00 1,462,940.00 1,080,400.00 1,120,870.00 1,333,860.00 1,753,350.00 1,162,940.00 1,826,000.00 1,543,500.00 1,748,830.00 1,664,040.00 1,236,800.00 1,072,520.00 1,735,750.00 1,565,310.00 1,906,920.00 1,130,700.00 Project Grant Project 289,921,642.00

Seri Seri Katti Piladi Piladi Piladi Bhoor Salkot Rakam Village Patmara Narayan Latikoili Malarani Malarani Ramghat Jagatipur Jagatipur Mulkhola BAYALA Dillichaur Badakhola Bhairabstan Dasarathpur Municipality Municipality Ghumkhahare Birendranagar Naule Katuwal

Jumla Jumla Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh Jajarkot District Achham Achham

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Name of Grantee Sarswati Krisak Samuha Sarswati Mirsit Group Sayapatri Khadhye Krishak Samuha Shakti Sarasowati Krisak Samuha Shiva Shakti Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Krishak Samuha Shramjyoti I.P.M. Shrejana Krisak Samooh Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Shristi Pragati Alu Utpadak Krishak Samuh Thata Tarkari Silsila Bemausami Sirjansil Mahila Krishak Samuha Biu Utapadan Krishak Samuha Tatha Tajatarkari Sishne Badakhet Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Sital Guranse Pashupalan Samuha Tatha Sital Krisi Alo Utpadan Krishi Samuha Srijanshil Biu Srijanshil Krishak Samuha,Dasrathpur,Surkhet Mahila Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Sunaulo Hariyali Kheti Krishak Samuha Tarkari Surya Kiran Dalahan Bali Krishak Samuha Swargabhumi Thalpata Krishak Samuha Talo Krishi Samuha Tarkari Bemausami Tariya Thata Phalphul Utpadak Krishak Samuha Tarkari Utpadan Krishak Samus Tarkari Thegne Uddhamshil Mahila Krishi Samuha Mahila Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Udya Krishak Samuha Tarkari Vayardanda Farmer Group Verikanstara

Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category - OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV OSV Total Value Value Chain Vegetable Vegetable Off-Season

549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 91 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Total Total 58,890.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 100,000.00 106,000.00 140,800.00 148,000.00 131,000.00 129,350.00 100,000.00 499,904.00 121,220.00 198,000.00 185,160.00 142,880.00 155,240.00 148,380.00 631,939.00 725,797.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,075,150.00 1,846,893.00 3,754,652.00 2,567,210.00 1,915,800.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 50,000.00 56,000.00 90,800.00 98,000.00 81,000.00 60,000.00 79,350.00 50,000.00 60,000.00 625,150.00 152,503.00 474,490.00 102,556.00 120,480.00 443,290.00 2,800,660.00 (NRs.) Amount 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 58,890.00 450,000.00 499,904.00 121,220.00 198,000.00 185,160.00 142,880.00 155,240.00 148,380.00 953,992.00 529,383.00 605,317.00 1,694,390.00 2,092,720.00 1,472,510.00 Project Grant Project

Salma Sahare Dhime Matela Matela Village Khalanga Khalanga Nigalchula Nigalchula Nigalchula Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Birendranagar Chandan Nath Kupinde Daha Kupinde Daha

Jumla Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot District

Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Type of Type Agro-vet Grantees Committee Forest User Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Name of Grantee Birbal Nepali Jitendra Khadka Krishna Prasad Dhakal Krishna Prasad Kandel Prem Bahadur Khadka Raju Kumar Khatri Rekha Kc Surendra Kumar Shahi Prasad Neupane Tilak Agrovet Shital Trading Centre Amarjit Samudayik Ban Upabhokta Samuha Agriculturecooperative Chuli Ekata Saving & Credit Coop Aalu Utpadan Mahila Krishak Samuha Jharana Lali Gurash Smaudayik Ban Upvokta Samuha Laligurans Biu Bijan Samuha Samudayik Krishi Coop Tribeni Bhairam Samudayik Ban Upvokta Samitee Thapa Store Bhairi Malika Krishi Bahumukhi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Aguwa Krishak, Samuha Dalit Fulbari Sawabalamban Ecovillage Krishak Samuhaul Himsekhar Sana Kishan Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd

PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF SDF ARD Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category BDS BDS BDS BDS BDS BDS BDS BDS BDS Value Value Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Chain Business Service Total Service Development

575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 S.N.

Page 92 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Total Total 118,750.00 684,097.00 321,400.00 877,730.00 562,080.00 232,312.00 152,000.00 160,750.00 290,750.00 297,000.00 253,653.00 250,000.00 135,000.00 270,000.00 250,000.00 181,000.00 250,000.00 Cost (NRs.) Sub-Project Sub-Project 1,939,150.00 2,130,000.00 1,201,760.00 1,054,760.00 1,009,551.00 1,921,800.00 2,058,694.00 1,919,880.00 1,427,019.00 1,862,266.00 31,922,152.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 61,685.00 98,884.00 39,312.00 361,110.00 140,848.00 319,500.00 299,325.00 215,626.00 196,230.00 436,770.00 144,646.00 381,214.00 495,800.00 296,319.00 332,986.00 7,874,922.00 (NRs.) Amount 118,750.00 543,249.00 902,435.00 259,715.00 839,134.00 813,321.00 733,084.00 463,196.00 193,000.00 152,000.00 160,750.00 290,750.00 297,000.00 253,653.00 250,000.00 135,000.00 270,000.00 250,000.00 181,000.00 250,000.00 1,578,040.00 1,810,500.00 1,485,030.00 1,677,480.00 1,424,080.00 1,130,700.00 1,529,280.00 24,047,230.00 Project Grant Project

Tosi Ratu Katti Katti Nada Paink Guthu Jhapra Jhapra Jhapra Sahare Sahare Dhime Village Binayak Binayak Narayan Ramghat Ramghat Ramghat Ramghat Maintada Kunathari Lekhparajul Municipality

Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh Dailekh District Achham Achham Achham Achham

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Research Center Name of Grantee Janagaran Swalalambi Sana Krishak Samuha Juri Ramka Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Jurimalika Jadibuti Producation Coopearative Kailash Samudayik Ban Upavokta Samuha Kalika Samudayik Ban Upvokta Samiti Kotkhola Jadibuti Utpadak Sahakari Kushe Himalaya Falful Krishak Samuha Laligurans Biu Bijan Samuha Laliguras Suntala Kheti Falful Krishak Samuha Mahadev Samudayik Sanstha Puranapani Samudayik Ban Upvokta Samuha Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Sarugad Mahila Bachat Samudayik Krishi Coop Tribeni Milan Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Yuva Seed Demonstration Turmeric And Ginger Chuketal Falfull Krishak Samuha Aduwa Bali Krishak Samuha Gangamai Turmeric Jurimalika Jadibuti Sahakari, Mulpani Krshitatha Pashupalan Sahakari Sastha Ltd Babasayk Masala Bali Krisak Samuha Agriculture Group Production Tarkari Taja And Bhagwati Suntala Agriculture Chetana Group Chureparbat Sana Kisanagriculture Cooperati Gotpada Farmer Cooperative Rin Sahakari Sanstha Tatha Hatemalo Bachat Agriculture Multipurpose Cooperative Janachatansil Janachetana Krishak Samuha

PIF PIF PIF PIF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF ARD Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Total Value Value Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Timur Chain Timur Timur Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric

611 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 93 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Project Project Total Sub- Total 115,000.00 240,000.00 121,500.00 213,190.00 268,689.00 229,997.00 185,900.00 179,400.00 450,315.00 863,124.00 996,234.00 947,099.00 891,500.00 463,501.00 Cost (NRs.) 1,084,827.00 2,082,106.00 2,061,342.00 1,613,660.00 3,406,980.00 1,245,403.00 1,178,829.00 1,050,615.00 2,214,217.00 1,279,823.00 16,127,620.00 27,097,930.00 ------(NRs.) Grantee Amount 499,318.00 293,127.00 788,816.00 627,202.00 514,580.00 246,068.00 380,185.00 454,747.00 391,608.00 197,571.00 133,725.00 197,775.00 191,973.00 9,756,310.00 1,256,980.00 1,023,710.00 1,350,630.00 18,500,600.00 (NRs.) Amount 115,000.00 240,000.00 121,500.00 213,190.00 268,689.00 229,997.00 185,900.00 179,400.00 585,509.00 157,188.00 617,056.00 616,049.00 221,693.00 724,082.00 659,007.00 749,528.00 863,587.00 757,775.00 265,726.00 6,371,310.00 8,597,330.00 1,293,290.00 1,434,140.00 1,099,080.00 2,150,000.00 1,087,850.00 Project Grant Project Sahare Kalche Kalche Kalche Jarbuta Village Rampur Rampur Binayak Binayak Binayak Raniban Kalimati Kalimati Kalimati Kalimati Kalimati Ramghat Ramghat Ramghat Bidyapur Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Rawatkot Chhinchu Kunathari Kunathari Karkigaun Lekhparajul Babiyachaur Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Jajarkot District Achham Achham Achham Achham Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Nabajananchetana Agriculturegroup Disable Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Narayan Janaklyan Pragatisil Krishak Samuha Ruiniya Danda Samudayik Ban Upavokta Samuha Agrculture Sanakisan Cooperative Samuha Tarkari Sayapatri Krishi Cooprative Tatha Simalpani Pashu Samudayak Gramen Bahudeshya Sahakari Sastha Veri Packing Udhyog Tatha Bhattari Masala Utpadan And Harbal Pvt Ltd Kushe Minarals Anapurna Krishi Sahakari Sastha Ltd Daade Krishak Samuha Danwantari Jadibuti Utpadan Sahakari Daunnedevi Krisak Samuha Deurali Bahudeshya Krishi Utpadan Krishak Samuha Gangamala Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Krishi Sahakari Tatha Gufatal Pasu Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Hariyali Rin Sahakari Sanstha Tatha Hatemalo Bachat Janajagran Krishi Utpadan Samuha Jaya Chitradevi Bahudeshya Krishi Utpadan Krishak Samuha Rin Sahakari Sanatha Ltd Tatha Jwala Mukhi Bachat Kasturi Bahudeshiya Sahakari Ren Sahakari Sastha Tatha Koldanda Mahila Bachat Kunidada Farmer Group Kushe Laghu Gharelu Coop PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF PPF Fund VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Value Chain Value 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 S.N.

Page 94 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Remarks

Project Total Sub- Total 688,562.00 822,092.00 952,870.00 255,000.00 368,000.00 454,000.00 257,950.00 659,333.00 Cost (NRs.) 1,316,956.00 1,215,948.00 1,694,787.00 1,189,051.00 2,440,040.00 1,409,952.00 1,372,509.00 1,562,555.00 1,556,026.00 2,017,812.00 1,166,013.00 1,575,195.00 1,444,929.00 87,689,176.00 18,474,250.00

- (NRs.) Grantee Amount 35,000.00 13,000.00 49,500.00 98,900.00 455,117.00 211,492.00 319,185.00 417,392.00 619,295.00 485,893.00 205,879.00 399,915.00 409,656.00 302,672.00 225,288.00 128,975.00 266,706.00 483,015.00 228,989.00 1,193,760.00 9,237,120.00 42,089,781.00 (NRs) Amount 997,771.00 798,556.00 569,756.00 202,669.00 822,092.00 727,582.00 220,000.00 355,000.00 404,500.00 128,975.00 899,307.00 560,433.00 1,239,670.00 1,246,280.00 1,198,460.00 1,166,630.00 1,162,640.00 1,146,370.00 1,715,140.00 9,237,130.00 1,092,180.00 1,215,940.00 Project Grant 45,599,395.00

Nepa Layati Sahare Sahare Malika Village Rampur Kalimati Ramghat Jagatipur Bidyapur Khalanga Khalanga Khalanga Kunathari Dillichaur Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Bindrasaini Babiyachaur Chandan Nath Kalimati Kalche

Jumla Jumla Salyan Salyan District Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Jajarkot Jajarkot Dailekh Dailekh

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Trader Trader Trader Trader Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Cooperative Service Provider Name of Grantee Narayan Janaklyan Tarkari Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Narayan Janaklyan Rin Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tatha Pahadi Bachat Pahadi Jadibuti Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Pokharipata Krishak Samuha Salleri Krishi Utpadk Samuha Sarsawati Mahila Krishak Samuha Shiddhababa Krishi Upavokta Coop Shivasakti Krishak Multipurpose Coop Krishi Cooprative Tatha Simalpani Pashu Sundhara Bahudasya Krishi Utpadan Krisak Samuha Prasodhan Sahakari Tatha Ujyalo Jadibuti Utpadan Thapa Krishi Sahakari Pashu Veri Samudayak Gramen Bahudeshya Sahakari Sastha Veri And Registraion Characterization Sean Seed Service Center, In Nepal Varieties And Spinach Of Cress Characterization Of Summer/Rainy Sean Seed Service Center, Vegetables Vegetables Winter Characterization Of Sean Seed Service Center, Marketed Sean Seed Service Center Ltd., Kathmandu Sur Bahadur Bohora Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Basant Biu Utpadak Krishak Samuha Tarkari Bihani Biu Prabardan Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Tarkari Hatemalo Himalayan Bahuudashaya Sahakary Sanstha

Fund ARD ARD ARD VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW1 VCFW1 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Total Value Value Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Chain Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Turmeric Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Turmeric Turmeric

651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 S.N.

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 95 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Remarks

Project Project Total Sub- Total 680,353.00 858,137.00 Cost (NRs.) 1,064,607.00 1,974,247.00 1,219,104.00 1,237,706.00 1,267,554.00 1,699,638.00 1,209,537.00 1,550,666.00 37,416,219.00 1,031,813,368.00 36 (NRs.) Grantee Amount 230,687.00 298,637.00 262,765.00 185,656.00 134,123.00 349,422.00 156,751.00 354,808.00 321,466.00 288,526.00 13,124,046.00 372,778,745.00 64 (NRs.) Amount 833,920.00 956,339.00 546,230.00 918,132.00 701,386.00 888,071.00 1,675,610.00 1,052,050.00 1,344,830.00 1,262,140.00 24,292,173.00 Project Grant Project 659,034,623.00

Sahare Sahare Talium Village Sanigaun Dillichaur Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Mehelkuna Dhajari Pipal Chandan Nath

Jumla Jumla Jumla Jumla Salyan Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet Surkhet District

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Type of Type Grantees Cooperative Cooperative Name of Grantee Janajagaran Tarkari Tatha Biu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tatha Tarkari Janajagaran Biu Uttpadan Samuha Tarkari Jharana Krishak Samuha Tarkari Kailash Krishi Utpadan Bebashai Sahakary Sanstha Ltd Laligurans Krishi Sahakari Laliguransh Krishak Samuha,Surkhet Beuu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Taja Naulo Bihani Biu Utpadan Krishak Samuha Tarkari Naya Nepal Biu Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Sandesh Biu Utpadan Samuha Tarkari Tatke

Fund VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 VCFW2 Category Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Seeds Value Value Chain Percent Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Vegetable Seeds Total Grand Total

673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 S.N.

Page 96 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Achham District Annex E: District Maps with Sub-projects

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 97 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Dailekh District

Page 98 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Jajarkot District Jajarkot

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 99 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Jumla District

Page 100 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Kalikot District Kalikot

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 101 September 2018 (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) Salyan District Salyan

Page 102 High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) (Annual Progress Report 2017/18) September 2018 Surkhet District Surkhet

High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas (HVAP) Page 103

g]kfn ;/sf/ s[lif tyf kz'kG5L ljsf; dGqfno pRr d"No s[lif j:t' ljsf; cfof]hgf (High Value Agriculture Project in Hill and Mountain Areas) cfof]hgf Joj:yfkg sfof{no, ;'v]{t ;Dks{ sfof{no, xl/x/ejg, nlntk'/ ;Dks{ kmf]g: )*#–%@#@(^, ˆofS;: )*#–%@%$)# ;Dks{ kmf]g÷ˆofS;: )!–%)!))@^ Web site: www.hvap.gov.np; Email: [email protected]