DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic and Social Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic and Social Council UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.5 6 March 2006 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty second session Agenda item 17 (b) of the provisional agenda PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS Report submitted by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders, Hina Jilani Addendum Compilation of developments in the area of human rights defenders* * The reason for the late submission of this report is the need to reflect the latest information. As it considerably exceeds the word limitation, this report is circulated as received in the languages of submission only. GE.06-12253 (E) 240506 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.5 page 2 Compilation of developments in the area of human rights defenders CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 - 10 6 Afghanistan .............................................................................................. 11 - 27 8 Albania ..................................................................................................... 28 - 44 11 Algeria ..................................................................................................... 45 - 56 14 Angola ...................................................................................................... 57 - 83 16 Argentina ................................................................................................. 84 - 95 20 Armenia ................................................................................................... 96 - 111 23 Australia ................................................................................................... 112 - 125 26 Azerbaijan ................................................................................................ 126 - 149 28 Bahrain ..................................................................................................... 150 - 167 32 Bangladesh ............................................................................................... 168 - 184 35 Belarus ..................................................................................................... 185 - 209 39 Bolivia ...................................................................................................... 210 - 221 44 Bosnia and Herzegovina .......................................................................... 222 - 230 46 Botswana .................................................................................................. 231 - 243 47 Brazil ...................................................................................................... 244 - 258 49 Bulgaria..................................................................................................... 259 - 267 52 Burundi .................................................................................................... 268 - 278 53 Cambodia.................................................................................................. 279 - 292 55 Cameroon ................................................................................................. 293 - 305 57 Central African Republic ......................................................................... 306 - 315 60 Chad ...................................................................................................... 316 - 326 61 Chile ...................................................................................................... 327 - 341 63 China (People’s Republic of) ................................................................... 342 - 368 66 Colombia .................................................................................................. 369 - 391 71 Costa Rica ................................................................................................ 392 - 405 76 Côte d’Ivoire ............................................................................................ 406 - 417 78 Croatia ...................................................................................................... 418 - 429 80 Cuba ......................................................................................................... 430 - 442 81 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.5 page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Democratic Republic of the Congo .......................................................... 443 - 465 84 Denmark ................................................................................................... 466 - 474 88 Dominican Republic ................................................................................. 475 - 481 89 Ecuador ..................................................................................................... 482 - 495 90 Egypt ......................................................................................................... 496 - 522 93 El Salvador ............................................................................................... 523 - 538 97 Equatorial Guinea ..................................................................................... 539 - 551 100 Eritrea ....................................................................................................... 552 - 566 102 Estonia ...................................................................................................... 567 - 574 104 Ethiopia ..................................................................................................... 575 - 593 106 European Union ........................................................................................ 594 - 606 109 Fiji ............................................................................................................. 607 - 613 111 Finland ...................................................................................................... 614 - 619 113 France ....................................................................................................... 620 - 626 113 Gambia ..................................................................................................... 627 - 637 114 Georgia ..................................................................................................... 638 - 655 116 Guatemala ................................................................................................. 656 - 681 118 Guinea Bissau ........................................................................................... 682 - 695 123 Haiti .......................................................................................................... 696 - 708 125 Holy See ................................................................................................... 709 - 714 127 Honduras ................................................................................................... 715 - 728 128 Hungary .................................................................................................... 729 - 737 131 India .......................................................................................................... 738 - 751 132 Indonesia ................................................................................................... 752 - 770 134 Iran (Islamic Republic of) ......................................................................... 771 - 791 138 Ireland ....................................................................................................... 792 - 801 141 Israel ......................................................................................................... 802 - 836 142 Jamaica ..................................................................................................... 837 - 845 149 Jordan ....................................................................................................... 846 - 859 150 Kazakhstan ................................................................................................ 860 - 877 152 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.5 page 4 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Kenya ....................................................................................................... 878 - 891 156 Korea (Republic of) ................................................................................. 892 - 900 157 Kuwait ...................................................................................................... 901 - 913 159 Kyrgyzstan ............................................................................................... 914 - 923 161 Lebanon ................................................................................................... 924 - 930 163 Liberia ...................................................................................................... 931 - 941 164 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya .......................................................................... 942 - 950 166 Macedonia (The former Yugoslav Republic of) ...................................... 951 - 965 167 Malaysia ................................................................................................... 966 - 984 170 Maldives .................................................................................................. 985 - 1000 173 Mali .......................................................................................................... 1001 - 1015 176 Mauritania ................................................................................................ 1016 - 1022 178 Mauritius .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Fact Sheet, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Country Fact Sheet DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO April 2007 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 2. POLITICAL BACKGROUND 3. POLITICAL PARTIES 4. ARMED GROUPS AND OTHER NON-STATE ACTORS 5. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ENDNOTES REFERENCES 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Official name Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Geography The Democratic Republic of the Congo is located in Central Africa. It borders the Central African Republic and Sudan to the north; Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda and Tanzania to the east; Zambia and Angola to the south; and the Republic of the Congo to the northwest. The country has access to the 1 of 26 9/16/2013 4:16 PM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... Atlantic Ocean through the mouth of the Congo River in the west. The total area of the DRC is 2,345,410 km².
    [Show full text]
  • Download It From
    IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 The IMD – an institute of political parties for political parties The Institute for Multiparty Democracy (IMD) is an institute of political parties for political parties. Its mandate is to encourage the process of democratisation in young democracies by providing support to political parties as the core pillars of multi- party democracy. IMD works in a strictly non-partisan and inclusive manner. Through this approach, the Institute endeavours to contribute to properly functioning, sustainable pluralistic political party systems. It also supports the activities of civil society groups which play a healthy role in multi-party democracies, even though they are not part of any formal party structure. IMD was set up by seven Dutch political parties in 2000 in response to requests for support from around the world. The IMD’s founding members are the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), Liberal Party (VVD), Christian Democratic Party (CDA), Democratic Party (D66), Green Party (GroenLinks), Christian Union (ChristenUnie) and Reformed Party (SGP). Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy Korte Vijverberg 2 2513 AB The Hague The Netherlands Address per September 1, 2006: Passage 31 2511 AB The Hague The Netherlands T: +31 (0)70 311 5464 F: +31 (0)70 311 5465 E: [email protected] www.nimd.org IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 Partners in Democracy Preface Without properly functioning political parties, resulted in a study for the European Parliament entitled democracies do not work well – a fact that is not yet No lasting Peace and Prosperity without Democracy & fully recognised within the international development Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections 2007 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections Volume 41
    Couverture_Ang:Mise en page 1 27.3.2008 14:33 Page 1 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2007 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 41 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamen tary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the background and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distribution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU’s database on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 41 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2007 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2007 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 41 1 January - 31 December 2007 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2008 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Floor Crossing on Party Systems and Representative Democracy
    The Impact of Floor Crossing on Party Systems and Representative Democracy 15 November 2006 Vineyard Hotel, Cape Town South Africa KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG • SEMINAR REPORT • NO 19 • JOHANNESBURG • MARCH 2007 © KAS, 2007 All rights reserved While copyright in this publication as a whole is vested in the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, copyright in the text rests with the individual authors, and no paper may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both authors and the publisher. It should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual authors and that the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung does not necessarily subscribe to the opinions of contributors. ISBN: 978-0-9802543-4-1 Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 60 Hume Road Dunkeld 2196 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa PO Box 1383 Houghton 2041 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa Telephone: (+27 +11) 214-2900 Telefax: (+27 +11) 214-2913/4 E-mail: [email protected] www.kas.org.za Editing, DTP and production: Tyrus Text and Design Printing: Intrepid Printers (Pty) Limited Foreword FLOOR-CROSSING LEGISLATION IN SOUTH AFRICA CAME INTO EFFECT IN 2002 AFTER A Constitutional Court ruling supporting its legality. The legislation was supported by 280 out of 324 MPs who voted – an 86% majority. However, much has changed since then: an overwhelming majority of ordinary South Africans, members of parliament (MPs) and political science experts are now opposed to floor crossing in this country. According to German political scientist Prof. Hans-Joachim Veen, floor crossing is ‘dysfunctional’ in a parliamentary system since it prevents parties in government and in opposition from acting as they should.
    [Show full text]
  • 365 AAK (Alliance for the Future of Kosovo), 24 Abacha, Sani, 20
    Index AAK (Alliance for the Future of Administrative transitional authority. Kosovo), 24 See also International interim Abacha, Sani, 20 government model Abdullah, Abdullah, 292, 0 Doyle on, 219–220 Abu Ghraib prison scandal, 331 interim government in Cambodia Abusive practices as, 227 international intervention and Afghan National Army, 02, 0, 0 ending of, 352 Afghanistan of local community power holders, benefits of international 44, 49 intervention in, 352 Academic area specialists, on the Bonn Agreement and political Balkans and Bosnia, 265 reconstruction in, 289–291 Accountability civic education by Tribal Liaison citizen conceptions of positive Office in, 0 peace and, 46 constitution of, 300–302 construction of political elites elections and distribution of power through interim sharing in, 64–65 governments, lessons elections under Bonn Agreement learned on, 70 in, 0 in democracies, international ethnic dimensions of loya jirgas, interim governments and, post-conflict stability and, 221 297–299 government, elections in state expatriate presence in, 8 undergoing transition and, external actors and sovereign 2 authority of interim regime international intervention and, 351 in, 66–67 nation-building and levels of, 4 forecast for imposed nondemocracy for past abuses, peace process in in, 117–118 Afghanistan and, 44 imposed democratic regime in, 96, of president in Indonesia to 100 legislature, 157–158 insurgency as political challenge of UNMIK in Kosovo, 17 in, 10 Accra Comprehensive Peace interim administration Agreement, 83, 206–207,
    [Show full text]
  • Political Party Development in Post-War Societies
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/2133 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Political Party Development in Post-War Societies: The Institutionalization of Parties and Party Systems in El Salvador and Cambodia Jeroen de Zeeuw A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics and International Studies University of Warwick Department of Politics and International Studies February 2009 “Just as men bear all their lives the mark of their childhood, so parties are profoundly influenced by their origins” Duverger, Political Parties, p.xxiii Contents List of Tables, Boxes and Figures iv List of Acronyms v Acknowledgements x Abstract xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Why Study Post-War Party Development? 1 1.2 Theoretical Foundations 3 1.3 Hypotheses and Research Questions 9 1.4 Research Design and Methods 12 1.5 Key Concepts 19 1.6 Chapter Outline 21 2 Parties and Party Systems in Established and New Democracies 23 2.1 Variety in Origins and Development of Political Parties 24 Party Origins and Development
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of American States Electoral Observation Mission
    ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION GENERAL ELECTION REPUBLIC OF PANAMA May 5, 2019 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS I. FINAL REPORT TO THE PERMANENT COUNCIL............................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 2 2. GENERAL ELECTION ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 PRE-ELECTORAL PHASE...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 ELECTION DAY ................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 POST-ELECTORAL PHASE ................................................................................................... 6 3. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 7 3.1 ELECTORAL JUSTICE ........................................................................................................... 8 3.2 PARTY AND CAMPAIGN FINANCING ................................................................................ 10 3.3 POLITICAL COMMUNICATION MODEL ............................................................................ 11 3.4 POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN .......................................................................... 13 3.5 POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF INDIGENOUS AND AFRO-DESCENDENT
    [Show full text]
  • María Luisa Parraguez Kobek, “Securing Democratic Charter" Defense and Cooperation in South America: Howard J
    Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2 Fall – Winter 2011 ISSN: 1533-2535 POLICY STATEMENTS COOPERATION AND CONTROVERSY Cresencio Arcos, “U.S.–Latin American Security Kevin Newmeyer, "The Honduran Ties: Episodic Relationships” Coup of 2009 and the Inter-American María Luisa Parraguez Kobek, “Securing Democratic Charter" Defense and Cooperation in South America: Howard J. Wiarda and Hilary Geopolitical Changes, UNASUR, and the SDC” Collins, "Constitutional Coups? Military Intervention in Latin America" R. Evan Ellis, “The United States and China in Latin America: Cooperation and Competition” Hernán Castillo,"Cultura Política y Fuerzas Armadas en Venezuela" Luis Hernández, "El Control Civil de COUNTRY AND REGIONAL ISSUES las Fuerzas Armadas en el Ecuador. ¿Intento Fallido?" Ivelaw Lloyd Griffith, “Political Acumen and Geopolitical Anxiety in Suriname” David Spencer, “The Evolution and BOOK REVIEWS Implementation of FARC Strategy: Insights from Its Internal documents” Matthew Finger: Review of Jodi Sérgio Luiz Cruz Aguilar, “A Particição Sul- Vittori, Terrorist Financing and Americana Nas Operações de Paz da ONU: Resourcing Algumas Consideracões” Joanna Gillia: Review of Cristina Marcano and Alberto Barrera Tyszka, Hugo Chávez STRATEGIC AND SECURITY ISSUES Patricia Kehoe: Review of Hal Brands, Latin America’s Cold War Jaime García Covarrubias, “Liderazgo Celina Realuyo: Review of Joseph Estrategico en Defensa” Nye, The Future of Power W. Alejandro Sánchez, “Sangre Joven: Richard W. Taylor: Review of Jorge Understanding the new wave of Armed Groups in G. Castañeda, Mañana Forever: Latin America” Mexico and the Mexicans Vicente Torrijos, “La Legítima Defensa en Perspectiva” Juan Carlos Gómez, “La Utilización de las Fuerzas Militares en un Ambiente Criminal y no de Guerra: Desafíos del Siglo XXI” 2011 Fall-Winter Issue / Volume 12 1 Security and Defense Studies Review Staff and Editorial Board Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama 2020 HIV Index and Exhibits
    [NAME] [FIRM] [ADDRESS] [PHONE NUMBER] [FAX NUMBER] UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT [CITY, STATE] __________________________________________ ) In the Matter of: ) ) File No.: A __________ __________ ) ) In removal proceedings ) __________________________________________) INDEX TO DOCUMENTATION OF COUNTRY CONDITIONS REGARDING PERSECUTION OF HIV-POSITIVE INDIVIDUALS IN PANAMA TAB SUMMARY GOVERNMENTAL SOURCES 1. U.S. Dep’t of State, 2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Panama, (May 11, 2020) available at: https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on- human-rights-practices/panama/. • “Discrimination…continued to be common due to ignorance of the law and a lack of mechanisms for ensuring compliance. LGBTI individuals reported mistreatment by health-care workers, including unnecessary quarantines.” (p. 18) • “Human rights NGOs reported receiving complaints of labor discrimination when employers found out employees were HIV positive…LGBTI NGOs reported at least one employer who allegedly sought ways to dismiss an HIV-positive employee who had 15 years of service at the company.” (p. 18) • “In September the NGO PROBIDSIDA published concerns about a shortage of antiretroviral medications for treating patients with HIV/AIDS. PROBIDSIDA claimed that bureaucracy and lack of interest from administrative offices at the Ministry of Health and the Social Security clinics led to late purchase orders and TAB SUMMARY late payment of providers, implying systematic prejudice against HIV-positive individuals within the health-care system.” (p. 18) 2. U.S. Dep’t of State, 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Panama, (Mar. 13, 2019) available at: https://www.state.gov/wp- content/uploads/2019/03/PANAMA-2018.pdf • “Discrimination continued to be common due to ignorance of the law and a lack of mechanisms for ensuring compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • In Post-Conflict Guatemala
    in post-conflict Guatemala ILLEGAL ARMED GROUPS AND THE FORCES BEHIND THEM By Susan C. Peacock and Adriana Beltrán ̈ WOLA in post-conflict Guatemala ILLEGAL ARMED GROUPS AND THE FORCES BEHIND THEM By Susan C. Peacock and Adriana Beltrán ̈ Acknowledgements The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and the authors of this report wish to acknowledge the contribution of WOLA interns Yeni Linquin, Andrea Faso and Ana Villalobos, who provided essen- tial research assistance. We thank Executive Director Joy Olson, Deputy Director and Director of Studies Kimberly Stanton, and Senior Associate for Central America Geoff Thale for their extensive editorial assistance. Special appreciation is extended to Program Assistant Gabi Kruks-Wisner who coordinated printing logistics and distribution. WOLA also wishes to thank The Moriah Fund and the Ford Foundation for their support of WOLA’s work on Guatemala. This report was researched and written jointly by Susan C. Peacock, consultant and conflict resolution specialist, and Adriana Beltrán, WOLA’s Program Officer for Guatemala. ISBN 0-929513-62-2 © Washington Office on Latin America, 2003 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 What are Hidden Powers? ........................................................................... 5 Attacks on Civil Society Actors in 2002-2003 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy 1999-2000
    1 (April 27, 2002) Polyarchy dataset Measures of democratization 1999-2000 Tatu Vanhanen Introduction The measures of democratization covering the years 1999 and 2000 are in this dataset the same as in the Polyarchy dataset 1810-1998, with one important change. Because referendums can be regarded to represent an additional dimension of democracy, they are now taken into account in the calculation of the Index of Democratization (ID). Referendums have been used in some countries, especially in Switzerland and the United States, since the 19th century, and their frequency has increased during the last decades (see Butler and Ranney 1994; Butler 1995; Gallagher 2001). As David E. Butler notes, referendums in Switzerland and some American states "have become a way of life, accepted as an essential part of democratic process" (1995: 1044). Generally speaking, referendums are used to deal with major issues or issues that seem to transcend the regular party alignments (see Gallagher 2001). In many European countries, for example, there have been important referendums on European integration (see Hug and Sciarini 2000). It is reasonable to argue that referendums increase the degree of democracy, because they give voters the possibility to decide some issues directly. Thus referendums represent the most important form of direct democracy in contemporary states (cf. Beyle 2000: 25). In the Polyarchy dataset, all types of national referendums and also state referendums are taken into account. Data on state referendums are mainly from the United States. Referendums are combined with the Participation variable in such a way that each national referendum adds the degree of participation by 5 points and each state referendum by 1 point for the year when the referendum took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala: Political Conditions, Elections, and Human Rights
    Order Code RL32124 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Guatemala: Political Conditions, Elections, and Human Rights Updated August 12, 2004 -name redacted- Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Guatemala: Political Conditions, Elections, andHuman Rights Summary Since the 1980s, Guatemala has been consolidating its transition from a centuries-long tradition of mostly autocratic rule toward representative government. A democratic constitution was adopted in 1985, and a democratically-elected government was inaugurated in 1986. Democratic institutions remain fragile. A 36- year civil war ended in 1996 with the signing of the Peace Accords between the government and the left-wing guerrilla movement. The accords not only ended the civil conflict, but constituted a blueprint for profound political, economic, and social change to address the conflict’s root causes. They outline a profound restructuring of state institutions, with the goals of ending government security forces’ impunity from prosecution, consolidating the rule of law; shifting government funding away from the military and into health, education, and other basic services to reach the rural and indigenous poor; and the full participation of the indigenous population in local and national decision making processes. From1997-2003, U.S. assistance to Guatemala focused on support of the peace process. Aid has declined from about $60 million in FY2002 to $38 million requested for FY2005. In the conference report for the FY2004 omnibus appropriations bill (H.Rept. 108-401), Congress criticized the Administration’s strategy of reducing staffing and funding for Guatemala. Current conditions on aid are in P.L.
    [Show full text]