DOCSLIB.ORG

Report January 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

January 2013 Edited by Pelin Ayan Musil and Juraj Mahfoud ii Edited by Pelin Ayan Musil and Juraj Mahfoud January 2013 iii iv FOREWORD This report is the outcome of a one-year research project led by Anglo-American University and supported by International Visegrad Fund. It is a compilation of country reports prepared by the partner institutions in each Visegrad country: Central European University IRES Department in Hungary, Tischner European University in Poland, Comenius University Institute of Public Policy and Economics in Slovakia and Anglo-American University in Czech Republic. The Center for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies (EDAM) contributes to the research project through publicizing the report in Turkey. The first draft of this report has been presented in a public symposium held at Anglo-American University in Prague on 9 November 2012. This final version of the report is to be presented in March 2013 in Turkey, with the kind contributions of the Ministry for EU Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. We also would like to thank Bogazici University Center for European Studies for hosting the presentation of this report in Istanbul, Turkey. The views expressed in this report are solely the authors’ and do not reflect the views of the supporters. v vi AUTHORS Konrad Pedziwiatr, PhD is an Assistant Professor at the Centre for European Studies, Cracow University of Economics and Tischner European University. Alumnus of the Jagiellonian University, University of Exeter and University of Oxford specializing in sociology of migration, new social movements and sociology o religion (especially Islam), holding a PhD in Social Sciences from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium). Author of monographs 'The New Muslim Elites in European Cities: Religion and Active Social Citizenship Amongst Young Organized Muslims in Brussels and London' (VDM Verlag 2010) and 'From Islam of Immigrants to Islam of Citizens: Muslims in the Countries of Western Europe' (Nomos 2005, 2007) and numerous other scientific and non-scientific publications on Islam and Muslims in Europe and social movements in Europe and the Middle East. Member of the Centre of Migration Studies, University of Warsaw and the Committee on Migration Research of the Polish Academy of Science. (Contact: Emel Akçali, PhD is an Assistant Professor at the International Relations and European Studies Department of Central European University in Budapest. She graduated in International Relations at both the American University (Paris, BA) and at the Université de Galatasaray (Istanbul, MA). She obtained her PhD in Political Geography at Paris IV-Sorbonne in France. She worked at the Political Science and International Studies Department of University of Birmingham as a visiting lecturer and taught at Franklin College, Lugano, Switzerland before joining IRES. Her current research interests span social movements, upheavals and (trans-)formation of collective identities in the age of globalisation and Europeanisation, the state, society and politics in the Middle East, EU democratisation efforts in its periphery, non- Western and alternative globalist geopolitical discourses and critical realist philosophy. 1 Pelin Ayan Musil, PhD is a faculty member and lecturer at the School of International Relations and Diplomacy of Anglo-American University in Prague. She obtained her MA degree from Central European University and PhD degree from Bilkent University in Political Science. During her PhD studies in 2007-2008, she has studied at the Department of Government of Georgetown University as a Fulbright Visiting Researcher. Her current research interests are comparative democratization, transitions from authoritarian regimes, political parties and party systems, politics of Turkey and Middle East as well as EU enlargement. Apart from the articles she wrote on these topics, she is the author of the book titled Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). Mgr. Juraj Mahfoud is a researcher at the School of International Relations and Diplomacy as well as Operations Manager at Anglo-American University in Prague. He obtained his BA degree from Anglo-American University and continued his MA studies at Metropolitan University in Prague in the major of International relations and European studies. He acquired his MA degree at Metropolitan University, where he made a research on the topic “Geostrategic consequences of Turkish integration to the EU”. His current research interest is concentrated on the region of Middle East, namely the Levant countries and their influence on the Middle East as well as on the European Union. Oľga Gyarfasova, PhD is an associate professor at the Institute of European Studies and International Relations, Comenius University in Bratislava, and senior researcher at the Institute for Public Affairs (IVO), a public policy research think-tank. In her work she focuses on public opinion, voting behaviour, nationalism, and populism. She has served as a national co-ordinator of European Election Studies in 2004 and the PIREDEU project in 2009 as well as the principal investigator of CSES study. She is author, co-author and co-editor of dozens of expert publications, among them Democracy and Populism in Central Europe: The Visegrad Elections and Their Aftermath (2007) and National Populism in Slovakia (2009). 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION by Pelin Ayan Musil…………………………………………….5 I. POLAND by Konrad Pedziwiatr……………………………….…………………10 II. HUNGARY by Emel Akcali……………………………………………………..37 III. CZECH REPUBLIC by Pelin Ayan Musil and Juraj Mahfoud…………………61 IV. SLOVAKIA by Olga Gyarfasova……………………………………………….86 APPENDIX – Interview Questions…………………………………………………112 3 4 INTRODUCTION Among the candidate countries to the European Union, Turkey is known to have a distinctive cultural and historical identity with a large Muslim population. Thus, it has been one of the most disputable candidates for EU membership. Together with its rising role as a regional power in the Middle East nowadays, the issue of Turkey’s accession to the EU deserves to be re-debated and put on public agenda again. Directed by such an objective, this report brings together the findings of a research, which investigates the approach of each Visegrad country—Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia—toward Turkey’s accession to the EU. The main research questions that are asked in this report are: How is Turkey publicly portrayed in each country? How does the public portrayal of Turkey correspond to the political and public opinion on its accession to the EU? What are the reasons for supporting or opposing Turkey’s membership in each country? The consensus among scholars and policy experts is that elite opinion should not be our only concern if we want to make predictions about the future of candidate countries because it is the public that has the power to halt accessions. 1 Thus, there is a need to understand the causal mechanisms for why people oppose or support candidate countries. This study partly achieves this goal by focusing on the portrayal of Turkey as an EU candidate in four Visegrad countries.2 Existing studies on the EU-Turkey debate do not particularly have a Visegrad focus.3 Yet, a Visegrad focus should be of concern for two reasons. First, Turkey at 1 Simon Hug. Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums and European Integration (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002). Dora Husz, “Perspectives: Public Opinion – A Stumbling Block to Enlargement?” Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs 20 (2003): 5–39. 2 A similar study on Turkey was also conducted in France. See EDAM Report. Turquie-France - Dialogue de Sourds. Avec le Soutien de STRATIM (2010), prepared by Nicole Pope. 3 There is, yet, one exception which combines Turkish and Central European perspectives on the politics of EU accession in one volume: Lucie Tunkrova and Pavel Saradin (eds), The Politics of EU Accession: Turkish challenges and Central European experiences (Routledge: New York and London, 2010). 5 the political level receives the support of these countries even though the public opinion differs in each. The political support is contrary to the picture we are familiar with in West European countries such as France and Germany. Second, Visegrad countries share a similar cultural background and a similar experience in their accession to the EU. As a matter of this resemblance, one might conclude that it is reasonable to expect a similarity in their public opinion on Turkey’s accession. In fact, the research findings show that the four countries show similarities in following aspects: It is observed in all four that Turkey-EU debate does not really occupy the public agenda, there is usually support for Turkey’s membership at the political elite level, no big deal of Turkish immigration takes place to any of the four countries. Thus, it is the media’s portrayal of Turkey that intuitively influences people’s minds about their approach to its membership in the EU. Yet, the Eurobarometer surveys conducted in the last seven years show that the public support for Turkey’s membership in the Visegrad countries varies significantly, especially between Hungary-Poland and Czech Republic-Slovakia. According to the surveys, while Hungary and Poland are more supportive of Turkey; Czech Republic and Slovakia are closer to the public opinion observed in Western Europe, which is more skeptical and less supportive of Turkey’s accession to EU (See Graph 1 and Graph 2). So, what causes such variance? GRAPH 1: PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST TURKEY’S ACCESSION TO THE EU (%) 70 60 50 CZ 40 HU 30 POL 20 SLOVAK EU 10 0 2005a 2005b 2006 2008 2010 Source: Eurobarometer Standard Reports 63-64-65-69-73 6 GRAPH 2: PUBLIC OPINION FOR TURKEY’S ACCESSION TO THE EU (%) 60 50 40 CZ HU 30 POL 20 SLOVAK EU 10 0 2005a 2005b 2006 2008 2010 Source: Eurobarometer Standard Reports 63-64-65-69-73 In the chapter on Poland, Pedziwiatr shows that the mainstream media describes Turkey in a highly balanced way or with hints of sympathy to Turkish EU ambitions.
Recommended publications
  • Framing 'Turks': Representations of Ottomans and Moors in Continental European Literature 1453-1683

    Framing 'Turks': Representations of Ottomans and Moors in Continental European Literature 1453-1683

    16 2019 FRAMING ‘TURKS’: Representations of Ottomans and Moors in Continental European Literature 1453-1683 ed. Peter Madsen Framing ‘Turks’: Representations of Ottomans and Moors in Continental European Litera- ture 1453-1683, ed. Peter Madsen Nordic Journal of Renaissance Studies 16 • 2019 General Editor of NJRS: Camilla Horster (NJRS was formerly known as Renæssanceforum: Journal of Renaissance Studies) ISSN 2597-0143. URL: www.njrs.dk/njrs_16_2019.htm FRAMING ‘TURKS’ NJRS 16 • 2019 • www.njrs.dk Preface The focus of this issue of Nordic Journal of Renaissance Studies is on Conti- nental Europe, i.e., areas bordering or situated near the Ottoman Empire or otherwise involved in close encounters. It has thus been important to include often neglected, yet most important nations like The Polish-Lithuanian Com- monwealth and Hungary (following the lead of the excellent volume edited by Bodo Guthmüller and Wilhelm Kühlmann: Europa und die Türken in der Renaissance, Tübingen 2000). It has also been important to consider literature beyond well-known classics, thus including works that attracted more atten- tion in their own times than they do today. Finally, it should be underscored how the literary (and intellectual) field beyond the vernaculars included pub- lications in Latin. The introduction is an attempt to situate the subject matter of the individual contributions within a broader historical, intellectual and literary field, thus including further documentation and additional literary examples. ‘Turks’ was the current denomination of contemporary Muslims, whether North African or Spanish ‘Moors’, or inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire or its spheres of various sorts of influence. It should be stressed, though, that although the Ottomans in terms of power and political establishment were Turkish, the inhabitants of the Empire were multi-ethnic and multi-religious.
  • John III Sobieski at Vienna

    John III Sobieski at Vienna

    John III Sobieski at Vienna John III Sobieski at Vienna Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) Bibliografia: [w:] Jan III Sobieski, List do królowej Marii Kazimiery, oprac. Leszek Kukulski, red. , wybór , Warszawa 1962. John III Sobieski at Vienna John III Sobieski’s entry to Vienna Source: Wjazd Jana III Sobieskiego do Wiednia, domena publiczna. Link to the lesson You will learn where from and why did Ottoman Turks come to Europe; what is the history of Polish and Turkish relations in the 17th century; who was John III Sobieski and what are his merits for Poland; what is the history of the victory of Polish army – battle of Vienna of 1683. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Since the 14th century the Ottoman Empire (the name comes from Osman – tribe leader from the medieval times) had been creating with conquests a great empire encompassing wide territories of Asia Minor, Middle East, North Africa and Europe. In Europe almost the whole Balkan Peninsula was under the sultan (Turkish ruler). The Turks threatened Poland and the Habsburg monarchy (Austria). Transylvania, Wallachia and Moldova (duchies which are parts of present‐day Romania and Moldova) were a bone of contention. In 1683 Vienna, the capital of Austria, was besieged by the Turkish army. Polish king John III Sobieski concluded an alliance with the emperor Leopold I. United Polish and German armies under the command of the Polish monarch came to the relief of Austrian capital. On 12th September 1683 there was a great battle of Vienna where John III magnificently defeated Turks. Polish mercenaries (Hussars) and artillery had the key role there.
  • Rocznik XXI • 2014 • Nr 1-2 (45-46)

    Rocznik XXI • 2014 • Nr 1-2 (45-46)

    W poprzednich numerach między innymi: 2011 nr 3-4 (35-36) Stanisław Dziedzic, Eksterminacja i trudne trwanie. Kościół katolicki w nadbałtyckich republikach sowieckich; Tadeusz Skoczek, Kultura studencka 1975–1989. Próba opisu zjawiska; Janusz Szczepański, Polonia amerykańska w walce o niepodległość Polski; Krzysztof Woźniakowski, Pamięć Powstania Listopadowego wśród polskich wojennych uchodźców na Węgrzech (1939–1945); Franciszek Ziejka, Ostatni rycerz dawnej Polski. Z tajemnic biografii i legendy Kazimierza Pułaskiego. 2012 nr 1-4 (37-40) Artur Bojarski, Powstanie Greków w latach 1821–1829 w prasie Królestwa Polskiego i Galicji; Adam Dera, Michał Sokolnicki – komiwojażer idei; Dariusz Faszcza, Udział wojska w życiu społeczno-kulturalnym Tarnopola(1921–1939); Mariusz Kulik, Polacy w jednostkach Rosyjskiej Gwardii w Warszawie na przełomie XIX i XX wieku; Przemysław Mrówka, Komitet Obrony Kraju. Struktura i zadania w latach 1959–1973. 2013 nr 1-2 (41-42) Paweł Bezak, Biżuteria patriotyczna doby Powstania Styczniowego; Janusz Gmitruk, „Gdy Polska powstanie inaczej będzie…”, Chłopska legenda powstań narodowych; Rafał Skąpski, Fotografie ze starego albumu – bracia Skąpscy w Powstaniu Styczniowym; Jolanta Załęczny, Żywe pomniki bohaterstwa, czyli o szacunku dla weteranów Powstania Styczniowego w II RP; Łukasz Żywek, Nowe nabytki Muzeum Niepodległości związane z Powstaniem Styczniowym. 2013 nr 3-4 (43-44) Krzysztof Bąkała, „Przybyli na Wołyń nieproszeni”( zarys stosunków społecznych i polity- cznych panujących na ziemiach dzisiejszej Ukrainy); Jan Engelgard, Partyzantka sowiecka wobec zagłady ludności polskiej na Wołyniu w 1943 r; Halina Murawska, Wołyńw zbiorach Muzeum Niepodległości. Zestawienie bibliograficzne; Mieczysław Samborski, Wołyń 1943. Przyczynki do historii wykonawców ludobójstwa na Polakach; Helena Wiórkiewicz, Pamiątki lwowskiej rodziny Drexlerów w zbiorach Muzeum Niepo- dległości w Warszawie.Dar Jadwigi Kern-Bałaty.
  • Through the Reign of Catherine the Great

    Through the Reign of Catherine the Great

    Chapter Thirty-two Religion in Eastern Europe and the Middle East from 1648 through the Reign of Catherine the Great What in Polish and Lithuanian history is called “the Deluge” began in 1648, with the revolt of Ukraine from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Ukraine has been important in the history of religion, and especially of Judaism. The Hasidic movement began in Ukraine in the eighteenth century. A century earlier, Ukraine had been the scene of an especially dark chapter in Jewish history. In what is conventionally called “the Khmelnytsky Uprising” (1648-1654) Orthodox Christians killed many thousands of Judaeans, and those who survived were forced temporarily to flee for safety to other lands. In order to see the Khmelnytsky Uprising and the rise of Hasidism in perspective, a summary glance at earlier Ukrainian history is necessary. Early history of Ukraine: Judaism and Orthodox Christianity in Kievan Rus We have seen in Chapter 24 that from the eighth century to the 960s the steppe country above the Black Sea, the Caucasus range and the Caspian had been ruled by the khan or khagan of the Khazars. Prior to the arrival of the Khazars the steppe had been controlled consecutively by coalitions of mounted warriors named Sarmatians, Goths, Huns and Avars. Under these transient overlords the valleys of the great rivers - Bug, Dniester, Dnieper, Don, Volga - were plowed and planted by a subject population known to the historian Jordanes (ca. 550) as Antes and Sclaveni. From the latter designation comes the name, “Slavs,” and it can be assumed that the steppe villagers spoke a variety of Slavic dialects.
  • 74 JANUSZ TAZBIR Encourage the King in 1462 to Conclude As Soon As Possible a Peace Treaty with the Teutonic Knights

    74 JANUSZ TAZBIR Encourage the King in 1462 to Conclude As Soon As Possible a Peace Treaty with the Teutonic Knights

    Acta Poloniae Historica 91. 2005 PL ISSN 0 0 0 1 -6 8 2 9 Janusz Tazbir THE BULWARK MYTH The term “bulwark” is one of the notions which have played an important part in the development of Polish historical conscious­ ness. In the 16th and 17th centuries it suited the concrete reality connected with the geopolitical situation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Although in the subsequent centuries it was relegated to the category of myths, it did not lose its significance. On the contrary, the term “bulwark” made a dazzling career in the period when the state once given this nickname, for many years (1795-1918) disappeared from the political map of Europe. It would take many pages merely to enumerate the titles of Polish and foreign works that from the 15th century onwards have described Poland as a wall, fence, bulwark, shield or fortress of Christianity. However, for a long time the main term that was used was the Latin one, and the first attempts to polonize it were made relatively late. This also goes for the appearance of the word antemurale in the Polish version, przedmurze. Not until the translation of The Old Testament made by Jakub Wujek (1599), did the term appear, e.g.: “a wall and a bulwark (przedmurze) will be erected there” (Isaiah), “and the bulwark (przedmurze) and wall were ruined together” (Threnodies). All the data convince us that Poland started to be described as a bulwark in the middle of the 15th century. This was already after the death in 1444 of Ladislaus III, later called Ladislaus of Varna, at the moment when the Ottoman power disturbed the whole of Europe by advancing far into the Balkan Peninsula.
  • Ottoman History of South-East Europe by Markus Koller

    Ottoman History of South-East Europe by Markus Koller

    Ottoman History of South-East Europe by Markus Koller The era of Ottoman Rule, which began in the fourteenth century, is among the most controversial chapters of South-East European history. Over several stages of conquest, some of them several decades long, large parts of South-Eastern Europe were incorporated into the Ottoman Empire, or brought under its dominion. While the Ottomans had to surrender the territories north of the Danube and the Sava after the Peace Treaty of 1699, the decline of Ot- toman domination began only in the nineteenth century. Structures of imperial power which had been implemented in varying forms and intensity in different regions were replaced by emerging nation states in the nineteenth century. The development of national identities which accompanied this transformation was greatly determined by the new states distancing themselves from Ottoman rule, and consequently the image of "Turkish rule" has been a mainly negative one until the present. However, latest historical research has shown an increasingly differentiated image of this era of South-East European history. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Military and Political Developments 2. The Timar System 3. Ottoman Provincial Administration 1. Regional Differences in the Ottoman Provincial Administration 4. Islamisation 5. Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity and Judaism 6. Urban Life 7. Appendix 1. Bibliography 2. Notes Indices Citation Military and Political Developments The Ottoman Empire had its roots in North-West Anatolia where in the thirteenth century the Ottoman Emirate was one of numerous minor Turkmen princedoms.1 The expansion of territory started under the founder of the dynasty, Osman (ca.
  • Parapro Assessment Information Bulletin (PDF)

    Parapro Assessment Information Bulletin (PDF)

    ParaPro Assessment Information Bulletin 2021–22 The policies and procedures explained in this Bulletin are effective only for the 2021–22 testing year (August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022) and supersede previous policies and procedures. The fees, terms and conditions contained in this Bulletin are subject to change. Educational Testing Service is dedicated to the principle of equal opportunity, and its programs, services and employment policies are guided by that principle. Copyright © 2021 by ETS. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and PRAXIS are registered trademarks of ETS. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2021–22 ParaPro Assessment Bulletin 2 www.ets.org/parapro Contents ParaPro at a Glance .......................................................... 4 File Corrections ........................................................13 Registration .................................................................4 Test Retake Policy .....................................................13 Test Takers with Disabilities or Health-related Acknowledgment and Data Retention ................13 Needs ............................................................................4 Acknowledgment .............................................................. 13 Test Preparation Material .........................................4 Personal Information ........................................................ 13 On Test Day ..................................................................5 How We Use Your Personal Information
  • Copyright by Agnieszka Barbara Nance 2004

    Copyright by Agnieszka Barbara Nance 2004

    Copyright by Agnieszka Barbara Nance 2004 The Dissertation Committee for Agnieszka Barbara Nance Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Nation without a State: Imagining Poland in the Nineteenth Century Committee: Katherine Arens, Supervisor Janet Swaffar Kirsten Belgum John Hoberman Craig Cravens Nation without a State: Imagining Poland in the Nineteenth Century by Agnieszka Barbara Nance, B.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2004 Nation without a State: Imagining Poland in the Nineteenth Century Publication No._____________ Agnieszka Barbara Nance, PhD. The University of Texas at Austin, 2004 Supervisor: Katherine Arens This dissertation tests Benedict Anderson’s thesis about the coherence of imagined communities by tracing how Galicia, as the heart of a Polish culture in the nineteenth century that would never be an independent nation state, emerged as an historical, cultural touchstone with present day significance for the people of Europe. After the three Partitions and Poland’s complete disappearance from political maps of Europe, substitute images of Poland were sought that could replace its lost kingdom with alternate forms of national identity grounded in culture and tradition rather than in politics. Not the hereditary dynasty, not Prussia or Russia, but Galicia emerged as the imagined and representative center of a Polish culture without a state. This dissertation juxtaposes political realities with canonical literary texts that provide images of a cultural community among ethnic Germans and Poles sharing the border of Europe.
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries

    Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries

    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
  • Special List 382: the Ottoman Empire

    Special List 382: the Ottoman Empire

    special list 382 1 RICHARD C.RAMER Special List 382 The Ottoman Empire 2 RICHARDrichard c. C.RAMER ramer Old and Rare Books 225 east 70th street . suite 12f . new york, n.y. 10021-5217 Email [email protected] . Website www.livroraro.com Telephones (212) 737 0222 and 737 0223 Fax (212) 288 4169 July 20, 2020 Special List 382 The Ottoman Empire Items marked with an asterisk (*) will be shipped from Lisbon. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED: All items are understood to be on approval, and may be returned within a reasonable time for any reason whatsoever. VISITORS BY APPOINTMENT Specialspecial Listlist 382 382 3 The Ottoman Empire Procession and Prayers in Mecca to Ward Off the Persians 1. ANTONIO, João Carlos [pseudonym of António Correia de Lemos]. Relaçam de huma solemne e extraordinaria procissam de preces, que por ordem da Corte Ottomana fizerão os Turcos na Cidade de Meca, no dia 16 de Julho de 1728. Para alcançar a assistencia de Deos contra as armas dos Persas; e aplacar o flagello da peste, que todos os annos experimenta a sua Monarquia. Traduzida de huma que se recebeo da Cidade de Constanti- nopla por ... Primeira parte [only, of 2]. Lisboa Occidental: Na Officina de Pedro Ferreira, 1730. 4°, disbound. Small woodcut vignette on title page. Woodcut headpiece with arms of Portugal and five-line woodcut initial on p. 3. Minor marginal worming (touching a few letters at edges), light browning, lower margin unevenly cut but not touching text. Barely in good condition. 21, (2) pp. $700.00 First Edition in Portuguese, with a lengthy and detailed description of a procession at Mecca.
  • BORDERLANDS of WESTERN CIVILIZATION a His Tory of East

    BORDERLANDS of WESTERN CIVILIZATION a His Tory of East

    BORDERLANDS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION A His tory of East Cen tral Eu rope by OSCAR HALECKI Second Edition Edited by Andrew L. Simon Copyright © by Tadeusz Tchorzewski , 1980. ISBN: 0-9665734-8-X Library of Congress Card Number: 00-104381 All Rights Reserved. The text of this publication or any part thereof may not he reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by Simon Publications, P.O. Box 321, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Printed by Lightning Source, Inc. La Vergne , TN 37086 Con tents PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION 1 PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION 4 1 THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND ETHNOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND 9 2 THE SLAVS AND THEIR NEIGHBORS 19 3 TOWARD POLITICAL ORGANIZATION 33 4 THE HERITAGE OF THE TENTH CENTURY 51 5 INTERNAL DISINTEGRATION AND FOREIGN PENETRATION 67 THE REPERCUSSIONS OF THE FOURTH CRUSADE IN THE BALKANS 77 6 THE HERITAGE OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY 93 7 THE NEW FORCES OF THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY 107 8 THE TIMES OF WLADYSLAW JAGIELLO AND SIGISMUND OF LUXEMBURG 135 9 THE LATER FIFTEENTH CENTURY 151 10 FROM THE FIRST CONGRESS OF VIENNA TO THE UNION OF LUBLIN 167 11 THE LATER SIXTEENTH CENTURY THE STRUGGLE FOR THE DOMINIUM MARIS BALTICI 197 12 THE FIRST HALF OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 219 13 THE SECOND HALF OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 239 14 THE END OF THE ANCIEN REGIME 261 15 THE PARTITIONS OF POLAND AND THE EASTERN QUESTION 289 16 THE NAPOLEONIC PERIOD 309 17 REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS UNTIL 1848 325 18 FROM THE CRIMEAN WAR TO THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN 353 19 TOWARD WORLD WAR I 373 20 THE CONSEQUENCES OF WORLD WAR I 395 21 THE PEOPLES OF EAST CENTRAL EUROPE BETWEEN THE WARS 417 22 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE WARS 457 23 HITLER’S WAR 479 24 STALIN’S PEACE 499 BIBLIOGRAPHY 519 INDEX 537 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION Polish born Oscar Halecki (1891 - 1973) was Professor of History at Cracow and Warsaw universities between the two world wars.
  • The Abhorred Name of Turk”: Muslims and the Politics of Identity in Seventeenth- Century English Broadside Ballads

    The Abhorred Name of Turk”: Muslims and the Politics of Identity in Seventeenth- Century English Broadside Ballads

    “The Abhorred Name of Turk”: Muslims and the Politics of Identity in Seventeenth- Century English Broadside Ballads A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Katie Sue Sisneros IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Nabil Matar, adviser November 2016 Copyright 2016 by Katie Sue Sisneros Acknowledgments Dissertation writing would be an overwhelmingly isolating process without a veritable army of support (at least, I felt like I needed an army). I’d like to acknowledge a few very important people, without whom I’d probably be crying in a corner, having only typed “My Dissertation” in bold in a word document and spending the subsequent six years fiddling with margins and font size. I’ve had an amazing committee behind me: John Watkins and Katherine Scheil braved countless emails and conversations, in varying levels of panic, and offered such kind, thoughtful, and eye-opening commentary on my work that I often wonder what I ever did to deserve their time and attention. And Giancarlo Casale’s expertise in Ottoman history has proven to be equal parts inspiring and intimidating. Also, a big thank you to Julia Schleck, under whom I worked during my Masters degree, whose work was the inspiration for my entry into Anglo-Muslim studies. The bulk of my dissertation work would have been impossible (this is not an exaggeration) without access to one of the most astounding digital archives I’ve ever seen. The English Broadside Ballad Archive, maintained by the Early Modern Center in the English Department at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has changed markedly over the course of the eight or so years I’ve been using it, and the tireless work of its director Patricia Fumerton and the whole EBBA team has made it as comprehensive and intuitive a collection as any scholar could ask for.