Regional Disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007 23/2009 Compiled by: Hungarian Central Statistical Office www.ksh.hu Issue 23 of Volume III 25 September 2009 Regional disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007 in Western Transdanubia and Central Transdanubia, respectively. The Contents order of the three regions was unaltered according to regional GDP cal- culations dating back for 14 years. The remaining four regions (lagging 1 Gross domestic product per capita behind the national average by 32%–37%) reached nearly the same level 2 Gross value added each: Southern Transdanubia kept its fourth position for ten years, pre- 3 International comparison ceding Southern Great Plain. Northern Hungary overtook Northern Great Plain in 2004, which order remained unchanged. Charts 4 The per capita indicator changed at different rates region by region in 7 Tables the previous year: the growth was the highest in Central Transdanubia (10%) and the lowest in Western Transdanubia (5%). Differences between regions were similar in the period under review as in 2006. The GDP per capita in the most developed region of the country (Central According to data for 2007 on the regional distribution of gross domes- Hungary) was invariably 2.6 times higher than in the one ranked last tic product regional disparities did not change significantly compared to (Northern Great Plain). Leaving out of consideration the figure for the previous year. Hungary’s gross domestic product measured at cur- Central Hungary – that includes the capital city – Western Transdanubia rent purchase prices amounted to HUF 25,479 billion in 2007, nearly the has the highest GDP per capita, which differs from the indicator value of half (47%) of which was produced in Central Hungary. 37% of the coun- Northern Great Plain by an essentially lower factor of 1.6. try’s total gross domestic product was produced in Budapest due to its leading position. Transdanubia accounted for 26.5% of GDP, and the Table 2 Great Plain and North large region as a whole also represented nearly Gross domestic product per capita by region the same proportion. The respective shares of the three large regions in 2007 were similar to those recorded in the previous year. GDP per capita, Difference from the Table 1 Region thousand HUF national average, % 2006 2007 2006 2007 Gross domestic product (GDP) by region Central Hungary 3 911 4 162 65.7 64.3 GDP (at purchasers’ prices) Central Transdanubia 2 141 2 357 –9.3 –7.0 Region billion HUF distribution, % Western Transdanubia 2 369 2 487 0.4 –1.9 2006 2007 2006 2007 Southern Transdanubia 1 598 1 730 –32.3 –31.7 Northern Hungary 1 512 1 627 –36.0 –35.8 Central Hungary 11 203 12 008 47.1 47.1 Northern Great Plain 1 491 1 596 –36.8 –37.0 Central Transdanubia 2 372 2 607 10.0 10.2 Southern Great Plain 1 564 1 692 –33.7 –33.2 Western Transdanubia 2 369 2 483 10.0 9.7 Country total 2 361 2 534 – – Southern Transdanubia 1 549 1 668 6.5 6.5 Northern Hungary 1 899 2 024 8.0 7.9 Northern Great Plain 2 280 2 426 9.6 9.5 In 2007 similarly to the last few years no significant changes were Southern Great Plain 2 104 2 265 8.8 8.9 observed in the ranking of the capital city and counties, either. The out- Country total 23 775 25 479 100.0 100.0 standing per capita indicator of the capital city (accounting for more than double the national average) was not approximated by any of the counties. Four Transdanubian counties were positioned above or near the national average. In 2007 some three quarters of counties besides Gross domestic product per capita the capital city did not change their position compared to the ranking in The value of gross domestic product per capita amounted to HUF 2 mil- the previous year, while 3 counties changed place with another 3. Three lion 534 thousand in Hungary in 2007, 7.3% more than one year earlier. counties in Transdanubia, two in Great Plain and Heves county were Concerning the seven regions of the country regional disparities meas- involved in the change of place. The position of the last three counties ured in terms of the per capita indicator slightly decreased, while the (Békés, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Nógrád) was unchanged in the past ranking of regions was unchanged compared to the previous year. five years. The difference between the most developed Budapest and the Central Hungary – which comprises the capital city – was still in the first least developed Nógrád county – the gap in terms of development – position, followed by Western Transdanubia, and Central Transdanubia increased continuously, reaching a factor of four and a half in 2006 and in position three. Out of these the GDP per capita was higher than the already 4.7 in 2007. Leaving out of consideration the figure for Budapest national average in Central Hungary, while 1.9% and 7% lower than that Győr-Moson-Sopron has the highest GDP per capita, which differs from 2 Regional Disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007 Statistical Reflections 2009/23 the indicator of Nógrád county, representing the lowest value, by essen- increase in Southern Transdanubia as well, while the highest, one percent- tially lower factors of 2.3 in 2006 and 2.4 in 2007. age point decrease in the share of agriculture was recorded there, too. Figure 1 GDP per capita by county, 2007 Thousand HUF 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 Vas Pest Zala Fejér Tolna Békés Heves Nógrád Baranya Somogy Budapest Csongrád Veszprém Hajdú-Bihar Bács-Kiskun r-Moson-Sopron ő Gy Komárom-Esztergom Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg GDP per inhabitant National av erage County av erage Due to the specific situation of the capital city the difference from the Industry and construction have a lower share in the performance of average calculated without Budapest better reflects the disparities between Central Hungary but over a third of the value added by these two indus- counties in terms of development. In 2007 the comparison with the coun- tries, too, are still produced there. Services branches represent an out- ty average shows that the classification of counties below the average standing 77.5% in the central region. somewhat changed compared to the previous year. Tolna county came closer to the average, while Veszprém county moved one category up to Figure 2 the below-110% interval. Thus the number of counties reaching above- Distribution of gross value added by main groups of industries average values grew to seven, and their distribution became more even. and by regions, 2007 Table 3 Central Hungary GDP per capita as a percentage of county average, 2007 Southern Transdanubia GDP per capita as a percentage of County Southern Great Plain county average Northern Great Plain Below average – 80.0 Békés, Nógrád, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Northern Hungary Bács-Kiskun, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, 80.1 – 90.0 Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok, Somogy Western Transdanubia Baranya, Csongrád, Hajdú-Bihar, Heves, 90.1 –100.0 Central Transdanubia Tolna Above average 100.1–110.0 Veszprém, Zala 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 110.1–120.0 Pest Agriculture Industry , construction Serv ices 120.1–130.0 Fejér, Vas Győr-Moson-Sopron, Komárom- 130.1– Esztergom In 2007 the total share of industry and construction was 48% and 44%, respectively, in the Transdanubian regions ahead in the ranking. Similarly to former years an invariably high proportion, over half (59%) Gross value added of the gross value added by Komárom-Esztergom county in Central Various economic branches contribute to the gross value added to differ- Transdanubia was represented by these industries, primarily consistent ing degrees, therefore the economic structure of regions plays a decisive with the performance of manufacturing branches. Fejér county also has role in influencing disparities between regions in terms of the level of significant industrial potential. Its performance was determined by the development. At national level goods-producing branches represent some manufacture of basic metals. The share of machinery branches is out- 30% of the production of gross domestic product. Services are dominant standing in Győr-Moson-Sopron and Vas counties, two counties of almost in all of the regions, which dominance intensified compared to Western Transdanubia as well, primarily due to the manufacture of 2006. Central Transdanubia is the exception since industry and construc- motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers. tion dominate the economy of the region, and their importance increased Among the regions contributing to a lesser extent to the gross value further in 2007. The share of industry and construction was on the added produced by the country the importance of agriculture is higher Statistical Reflections 2009/23 Regional Disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007 3 than the average in the regions of the Great Plain and in Southern was 57% in Southern Transdanubia, 58% in Southern Great Plain and Transdanubia. In 2007 a quarter of the gross value added by the agricul- 60% in Northern Great Plain. The position of the region of Central ture of the country was produced in the region of Southern Great Plain – Hungary as measured against the average of the European Union wors- within which nearly ten per cent in Bács-Kiskun county. Among the ened in comparison with 2006. The lag of Central Transdanubia behind regions having reached lower economic performance Northern Hungary the average somewhat decreased, while that of the rest of the regions is an exception, where industry and construction represent a relatively went up compared to the previous year.
Recommended publications
  • S. Transdanubia Action Plan, by Pécs-Baranya, HU
    Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism (CCT) in Europe Action Plan for South Transdanubia, Hungary ChamMap of partnerber of are Commercea / Partner info and Industry of Pécs- Baranya May 2021 Cultural and Creative Industries contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism in Europe _________________________ © Cult-CreaTE Project Partnership and Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya, Hungary This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-CreaTE Project Management and Coordination Unit and the respective partner: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-CreaTE Action Plan Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs- Baranya, Hungary The Cult-CreaTE Project Communications unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this action plan as a source, sent to e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya and in no way reflect the views of the Cult-CreaTE partnership, the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user.
    [Show full text]
  • Fdi European Cities and Regions of the Future 2020-21
    CONTENTS Published by The Financial Times Ltd, Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7873 3000. Editorial fax: +44 (0)1858 461873. Staff members can be contacted by dialing +44 (0)20 7775 followed by their extension number Editor-in-Chief Courtney Fingar 6365 [email protected] Deputy Editor Jacopo Dettoni 4339 [email protected] Global Markets Editor Sebastian Shehadi 3186 [email protected] Global Investment Reporter Alex Irwin-Hunt 6437 [email protected] Production Manager Richard Gardham 6367 [email protected] Deputy Production Editor Andrew Petrie 6230 [email protected] Executive Editor Brian Caplen 6364 [email protected] Art Director Paramjit Virdee 6535 [email protected] Advertisement Executive Sophie Horton 4830 [email protected] Global Business Director Adrian Northey 6333 [email protected] Associate Publisher Charlotte Lloyd +34 (0)682736571 [email protected] Associate Publisher Luke McGreevy +971 (0)4 391 4398 [email protected] Publishing Director Angus Cushley 6354 [email protected] B2B Marketing Manager Lauren Drew 4462 [email protected] Senior Marketing Executive Jay Seenundun 6896 [email protected] Magazine customer services CDS Global, Tower House, Lathkill Street, Sovereign Park, Market Harborough, Leics, UK. LE16 9EF [email protected] tel: 0845 456 1516 (customer services) 01858 438417 (overseas), fax: +44 (0)1858 461 873 The Financial Times adheres to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice: www.ft.com/editorialcode INTRODUCTION Printed by Walstead Group in the UK In spite of the uncertainty caused by Brexit, London retains its position as fDi’s European City of the Future Registered Number: 227590 (England and Wales) ISSN: 1476-301X © Financial Times Ltd 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Transdanubian Region of Hungary According to Plant Species Diversity and Floristic Geoelement Categories
    FOLIA OECOLOGICA – vol. 44, no. 1 (2017), doi: 10.1515/foecol-2017-0001 Review article Analysis of the Transdanubian region of Hungary according to plant species diversity and floristic geoelement categories Dénes Bartha1*†, Viktor Tiborcz1* *Authors with equal contribution 1Department of Botany and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, University of West Hungary, H-9400 Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky 4, Hungary Abstract Bartha, D., Tiborcz, V., 2017. Analysis of the Transdanubian region of Hungary according to plant species diversity and floristic geoelement categories.Folia Oecologica, 44: 1–10. The aim of this study was to describe the proportion of floristic geoelements and plant biodiversity in the macroregions of Transdanubia. The core data source used for the analysis was the database of the Hungar- ian Flora Mapping Programme. The analysed data were summarized in tables and distribution maps. The percentage of continental elements was higher in dry areas, whereas the proportion of circumboreal elements was higher in humid and rainy parts of Transdanubia. According to the climatic zones, the highest value of continental geoelement group occurred in the forest-steppe zone. The plant species diversity and geoele- ments were analysed also on a lower scale, with Transdanubia specified into five macroregions. The highest diversity values were found in the Transdanubian Mountain and West-Transdanubian regions because of the climatic, topographic, and habitat diversity. Keywords Borhidi’s climatic zones, climatic variables, floristic geoelement categories, macroregion, species diversity, Transdanubia Introduction Hungary is influenced by many different environmental In some European countries, floristic assessments conditions which are also reflected in the floristic diver- have already been made based on published flora at- sity.
    [Show full text]
  • Szombathely’S Economy
    Economy & investment At the intersection of Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary Excellent infrastructure and labour culture, a highly qualified workforce, high-level professional and Slovakia, centrope is emer- knowledge and the advantageous location of the town have been crucial for the development of ging as a new and prospering Szombathely’s economy. The largest industrial area of the town is Claudius Industrial Park with an www.szombathely.hu transnational region, home to area of 185 hectares and a further 31.1 hectares available for future utilisation. The business park is 6.5 million people. Since its incep- mostly populated by manufacturers of vehicle parts, electronics, informatics and the processing in- tion in 2003, political leaders of dustry, creating high production value and applying high-end technologies, as well as by commercial Szombathely 16 regions and cities have been hypermarket chains. 168 enterprises operate here, with an overall sales revenue of HUF 80 billion committed to strengthening the in 2010. Szombathely expects that investors will also make use of a complex of 10 buildings with centrope area of co-operation. railway connection and public utilities situated on 20 hectares of land at the town centre. For more information see www.centrope.com Urban development Szombathely managed to draw significant EU funds for its development projects, which has fundamentally changed the image of the town centre, contributed to enriching the standing of this “Hun- garian Town of Culture” and helped to reinterpret the tourism treasures inherited from the Szombathely’s Roman past. As a result of these developments, billions of HUF were channelled into the town to set up meet Szombathely.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Hungary 2021 About Hungary
    Investing in Hungary 2021 About Hungary Area: approx. 93,000 km2 Population: 9.77 million (2020) National currency: Hungarian forint (HUF) Capital city: Budapest (pop.: 1.7 million) Time zone: CET/CEST GDP: EUR 135.9 billion (at market prices in 2020, Eurostat) Key sectors Why Hungary? Automotive is one of Hungary’s core Favorable location industries, employing a total of approx. 170,000 people, producing roughly The easy accessibility of Hungary is often cited as one of its main advantages: 20% of total exports. Electronics, it is at the crossroads of three major European transport corridors. Hungary has ICT, pharmaceuticals and medical one of the highest motorway densities in Europe and has three international-, technology and renewable energy are and four regional business airports. The country’s location enables companies also increasingly important, as the to have morning calls with Asian countries and afternoon calls with the USA, country is shifting towards an R&D and which makes Hungary a preferred location for shared service centers as well. innovation focus. The food industry The climate of the country lacks extremes and can be considered a typical may also be considered a traditionally continental climate. important sub-sector of the economy. The last two decades have shown that Attractive human capital Hungary, with its skilled labor force, is an ideal country for the operation of Hungary provides a well-qualified workforce at an advantageous cost. The shared service centers. labor force consists of 4.5 million individuals (in July-September 2020), and the unemployment rate is 4.4% (in July-September 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers in the Carpathian Basin and the Spread of Agriculture in Europe
    Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers in the Carpathian Basin and the Spread of Agriculture in Europe By William J. Eichmann .................................................................................. University of Wisconsin, Madison Archaeological Institute of the [email protected] Hungarian Academy of Sciences 1014, Úri u. 49, Budapest Advisers: Dr. Eszter Bánffy and Dr. Róbert Kertész .................................................................................. Seminal research in the 1970’s resulted in the recognition that events in Transdanubia (western Hungary) during the 6th millennium B.C. were pivotal to the spread of agriculture to north central Europe. Two perspectives have figured prominently in the debate: 1) agriculture was directly spread by migrating agricultural populations; and 2) agriculture spread through the adoption of agricultural practices by indigenous hunter- gatherer populations. In Hungary the spread of agriculture has primarily been approached from the perspective of the first farmers (Neolithic). Limited archaeological evidence from Mesolithic hunter-gatherers during the Early Holocene (~10,000-6,000 B.C.) in the Carpathian Basin has made it difficult to consider their role in the entire process. It is argued that the complex process of agricultural spread may be more comprehensible if research is specifically directed toward identifying long term evolutionary trends in Mesolithic hunter-gatherer society. This paper provides a summary of extant evidence from the Mesolithic and Neolithic in Hungary, with an emphasis on Transdanubia, and presents some of the preliminary results of recent research on the Mesolithic. Introduction The prehistoric spread of agriculture B.C. the first agricultural societies was the impetus for one of the most (Neolithic) in Europe appeared in significant reorganizations of human Greece, and by the early 4th millennium society.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohesion And/Or Growth? Regional Dimensions of Convergence and Growth in Hungary
    STUDIES Andrea Elekes Cohesion and/or Growth? Regional Dimensions of Convergence and Growth in Hungary SUMMARY: Convergence and territorially balanced economic growth require faster economic growth in weaker regions. It is dif- ficult to decide what measures would strengthen the growth capacity of regions most. Following a brief review of growth the- ories and the growth and catch-up performance of the Hungarian economy, the study focuses on the differences in develop- ment across regions in Hungary. Both the analysis of available statistical data and the calculations in connection with the catch-up rate show that the Hungarian regional development is strongly differentiated, and the so-called centre–periphery relationship can clearly be identified. Growth factors (e.g. human capital and R&D investment, innovation) should be enhanced simultaneously. Cohesion policy can complement and support growth objectives in many areas. Moreover, through the coordination of the innovation and cohesion policies even the trade-off problem between efficiency and convergence may be reduced. KEYWORDS: regional convergence, growth, cohesion, crisis JEL-CODES: F43, R11, R12 Convergence and territorially balanced eco- will be discussed next. The third part focuses nomic growth require a faster increase in on the differences in domestic regional devel- income, employment and economy in weaker opment, primarily through an analysis of the regions than in stronger ones. However, it is statistical data regarding the factors identified rather difficult to decide what measures would in the theoretical section. strengthen the growth capacity of regions Following the mapping of domestic regional Cmost. development, the question arises what role This study is, therefore, essentially searching cohesion policy may play in convergence and in for answers for the following questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Comparison
    Effective Cross-border Co-operation for Development of Employment Growths in Arad and Békés County – Labour Market Comparison 2019 ROHU 406: CROSSGROWING Effective cross-border co-operation for development of employment growths in Arad and Békés County Békés County Foundation for Enterprise Development The content of this study does not necessarily represent the official position of the European Union. The project was implemented under the Interreg V-A Romania-Hungary Programme, and is financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund, Romania and Hungary. Copyright © 2019 BMVA. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 5 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 14 3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH ........................................... 19 3.1. The labour market as an area of intervention ....................................................... 19 3.1.1. Production factors, supply and demand in the labour market ....................... 21 3.1.2. Unemployment and labour shortages ............................................................ 25 3.1.3. Employment and employment policy .............................................................. 31 3.2. System of cross-border cooperation ..................................................................... 37 3.2.1. Theories and principles of cross-border cooperation ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • EU Mapping of Child Protection Systems Lot 16
    Report of Various Sizes (FRANET) EU mapping of child protection systems Lot 16 – Hungary 2 April 2014 Contents I. Legislative framework and policy developments ................................................... 2 II. Structures and Actors ...................................................................................... 41 III. Capacities ...................................................................................................... 77 IV. Care ........................................................................................................... 91 V. Accountability ............................................................................................... 118 References ........................................................................................................ 166 Annex – Terms and definitions ............................................................................. 183 1 I. Legislative framework and policy developments 1. Overview of the normative framework of the national child protection system. 1. Normative framework: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UN CRC) was ratified in 1991 in Hungary1. The new Child Protection Act in accordance with the CRC came into force in November of 19972. Its main goal is to promote the best interests, the protection and wellbeing of children. The normative framework ensures the well- being and the protection of children from violence, exploitation, abuse, neglect, trafficking, child labour, and child separation. The children’s’ rights approach
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism in Hungary
    Tourism in Hungary www.hungary.com H-1012 Budapest, Vérmező út 4. • Tel: +36 1 488-8700, fax: +36 1 488-8711 • E-mail: [email protected] 2003 Central Transdanubia Lake Balaton Lake Tisza Northern Plains Great Northern Hungary Southern Plains Great Southern Transdanubia Western Transdanubia Budapest and the Central Danube Region General information office Tourinform I I I I I I I I I about Hungary regions Tourist Territory: 93,030 sq. km Population: 10,116,742 (1 January 2004) Population density: 109.0 persons per sq. km Capital: Budapest territory: 525 sq. km population: 1,705,309 (1 January 2004) population density: 3,248 persons per sq. km Time zone: GMT + 1 hour Daylight saving: + 1 hour from last weekend of March to last weekend of October Official language Hungarian Form of state: republic Public administration: 19 counties and Budapest Geographical Location Hungary lies in the Carpathian Basin in Central Europe. The country spans 268 km from north to south, while the largest distance in an east- west direction is 528 km. Geographical Regions Fifty percent of the territory is made up of plains: the Hungarian Great Plains (Alföld), which takes up the whole eastern part, and the Small Plains (Kisal- föld), which lies along the north-western border. The two largest rivers, the Danube (the Hungarian stretch being 417 km) and the Tisza (598 km) run through the country from the north towards the south. The Duna-Tisza- Region is another area of flatland between the two larger rivers, while the gently sloping area west of the Danube is called Transdanubia (Dunántúl), with Lake Balaton, Central Europe's warmest lake, in the middle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Child Protection System, 2010
    12/2011 Produced by: Hungarian Central Statistical Office www.ksh.hu Issue 6 of Volume 12 29 July 2011 The child protection system, 2010 Contents 1 The construction of the child protective system The members are: – hygienic service providers (doctors, district nurses) 1 Child welfare services – social institutions – educational institutions 2 The notary’s function in child protection – day time provision (nursery) – police – public prosecutor's department, court – social organisations, church, foundation In 2010, 108 minors at risk per thousand inhabitants of corresponding – patron custodial service age were registered at public guardianship authorities in Hungary. They – citizens live in family, but the child welfare services can help them and ease their – notary everyday life. Basic provision shall contribute to the promotion of the physical, intellectual, emotional and moral development, welfare and Figure 2 upbringing of the child in a family environment, the prevention and Distribution of calls sent through the child protective system by elimination of existing endangerment. members, %, 2010 Every second minors at risk was endangered for environmental reasons. There are huge regional differences in the country: Educational institution Figure 1 Number of minors at risk per thousand inhabitants of Notary corresponding age, by counties, 2010 District nurses Police Social institution Citizen Patron custodial serv ice Day time prov ision Doctor 42.0– 53.8 Other 53.9– 81.2 81.3 – 113.2 113.3 – 144.9 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 % 145.0 – 248.2 Child protection in Hungary is not only a moral but also a legal obligation. The specialists working in the institutions signal the observed problem The tasks of the members of the child protection system prescribed by to the child welfare service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union
    The Committee of the Regions and the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union © Gödöllő: The Royal Palace, Budapest: Mr. Tamas Cziglan, Debrecen: Mr. Gabor Nagy Hungary: Six months to focus on the european rubik cube! Mercedes Bresso President of the Committee of the Regions A range of colours, strong rivets and painstaking combinations, these are the magic ingredients that give the cube invented by Hungarian Ernõ Rubik its solidity and flexibility. These very same ingredients are at the core of the European Union’s progress: the diversity of our regions, the interdependence of our institutions, and the search for shared solutions. It is indeed in a heartfelt spirit of cooperation that the Committee of the Regions welcomes the beginning of the Hungarian Presidency, which completes the institutional cube introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, the first Trio- Presidency. There are numerous and significant items on the Hungarian Presidency’s agenda. The Committee of the Regions is primed to make its contribution. Working together, we will successfully launch the new economic governance mechanisms and develop the framework of medium to long term policy initiatives and financial instruments. The implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy will start on 1 January 2011, with the beginning of the so- called European Semester. The Spring Council will have the job of strengthening the EU’s coordination of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth policies. The Committee will urge it on by promoting the partnership between local and regional authorities, national administrations and EU institutions, as well as through the implementation of the Territorial Pacts.
    [Show full text]