Fdi European Cities and Regions of the Future 2020-21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fdi European Cities and Regions of the Future 2020-21 CONTENTS Published by The Financial Times Ltd, Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7873 3000. Editorial fax: +44 (0)1858 461873. Staff members can be contacted by dialing +44 (0)20 7775 followed by their extension number Editor-in-Chief Courtney Fingar 6365 [email protected] Deputy Editor Jacopo Dettoni 4339 [email protected] Global Markets Editor Sebastian Shehadi 3186 [email protected] Global Investment Reporter Alex Irwin-Hunt 6437 [email protected] Production Manager Richard Gardham 6367 [email protected] Deputy Production Editor Andrew Petrie 6230 [email protected] Executive Editor Brian Caplen 6364 [email protected] Art Director Paramjit Virdee 6535 [email protected] Advertisement Executive Sophie Horton 4830 [email protected] Global Business Director Adrian Northey 6333 [email protected] Associate Publisher Charlotte Lloyd +34 (0)682736571 [email protected] Associate Publisher Luke McGreevy +971 (0)4 391 4398 [email protected] Publishing Director Angus Cushley 6354 [email protected] B2B Marketing Manager Lauren Drew 4462 [email protected] Senior Marketing Executive Jay Seenundun 6896 [email protected] Magazine customer services CDS Global, Tower House, Lathkill Street, Sovereign Park, Market Harborough, Leics, UK. LE16 9EF [email protected] tel: 0845 456 1516 (customer services) 01858 438417 (overseas), fax: +44 (0)1858 461 873 The Financial Times adheres to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice: www.ft.com/editorialcode INTRODUCTION Printed by Walstead Group in the UK In spite of the uncertainty caused by Brexit, London retains its position as fDi’s European City of the Future Registered Number: 227590 (England and Wales) ISSN: 1476-301X © Financial Times Ltd 2020. FDI is a trade- 04for 2020/21, while Paris keeps the regional crown. mark of Financial Times Ltd 2020. “Financial Times” and “FT” are registered trademarks and service marks of the Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. No part CITIESWINNERS of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form of advertising without prior permission in writing London has retained its position as fDi’s European City of the Future, while Paris has climbed to second from the editor. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a 06place, knocking Dublin into the third spot. result of material in this publication can be accepted. On any specific matter, reference should be made to an appropriate adviser. Registered Office: Bracken FDISTRATEGY:CITIES House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT, UK London is crowned best major city in Europe in fDi’s FDI Strategy category, with Glasgow, Vilnius, Reykjavik Reprints are available of any fDi Magazine article, with your company logo and contact details inserted if 18and Galway also winning out. required (minimum order 100 copies). For details telephone 0207 873 4816. For one-off copyright licences for reproduction of fDi magazine articles telephone 0207 873 4871. REGIONSWINNERS Alternatively, for both services Paris Region has kept its fDi European Region of the Future title, while Dublin Region holds on to second e-mail [email protected] 24place and North Rhine-Westphalia is in third. FDISTRATEGY:REGIONS North Rhine-Westphalia is fDi’s top large region for FDI Strategy, with the Basque Country topping the table 34for mid-sized regions and Ireland South East first among small regions. UKLEPs WINNERS London LEP and Thames Valley Berkshire LEP hold on to their respective first and second places in the 38Local Enterprise Partnership rankings, while Oxfordshire LEP jumps up eight places to third. February/March 2020 www.fDiIntelligence.com 3 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION EUROPEAN CITIES AND REGIONS OF THE FUTURE 2020/21 EUROPEAN CITIES AND REGIONS OF THE FUTURE 2020/21 European Cities and Regions of the Future 2020/21 Winners IN SPITE OF THE UNCERTAINTY CAUSED BY BREXIT, LONDON RETAINS ITS POSITION AS fDi’S EUROPEAN CITY OF THE FUTURE FOR 2020/21, WHILE PARIS KEEPS THE REGIONAL CROWN. NAOMI DAVIES REPORTS he three-and-a-half years since relocated or are putting plans in On the other hand, Brexit has the UK’s 2016 Brexit vote have motion to ensure access to the EU incentivised some companies to Tbeen tumultuous, marked by single market. In February 2019, the invest in the UK. In September 2018, divisive national debate, several knife- Dutch government revealed it was Switzerland-based law firm Lalive edge votes and two general elections. in talks with more than 250 compa- announced it will be setting up an According to EY’s Europe nies about moving their operations office in London in preparation for Attractiveness Survey 2019, 38% of from the UK to the Netherlands, the increased need for dispute resolu- investors believe Brexit to be the most having already secured firms tion legal services as a result of Brexit. significant risk to Europe’s attractive- including Discovery Channel, Sony In addition, Severs.com, a global ness, up from fourth the previous and Bloomberg. hosting provider and subsidiary of year. Political instability in the EU In the financial sector, many com- Luxembourg-based XBT Holding, was the second most common con- panies are opting to move or expand opened a new data centre in the capi- cern, followed by the rise in populist away from London. In January 2020, tal in May 2019 to address any data and protectionist feeling. JPMorgan Chase & Co announced sovereignty fears among the compa- plans to expand in Paris – whose sur- ny’s client base following Brexit. London falling? rounding region retains the fDi’s With the UK having left the EU on In spite of this tumultuous environ- European Region of the Future crown January 31, 2020, and a withdrawal ment, London has retained its posi- – buying the former BNP Paribas deal in place that provides for a tran- tion at the top of fDi’s European offices to house as many as 450 staff. sition period until December 31, Cities of the Future ranking, but is In addition, firms such as Barclays, 2020, some light has finally been its grip likely to weaken in a post- Goldman Sachs and Bank of America shed for both future investors and Brexit landscape? With investors have been preparing for the worst- other locations seeking to close the seeking to diversify their EU pres - case Brexit scenario by building gap on the UK’s investment hub sta- ence outside the UK, an increasing offices in cities including Dublin, tus. All eyes will now be on London to number of companies have already Paris and Frankfurt. see what the next few years bring. ■ 4 www.fDiIntelligence.com February/March 2020 INTRODUCTION EUROPEAN CITIES AND REGIONS OF THE FUTURE 2020/21 TOP 25 EUROPEAN CITIES OF THE FUTURE 2020/21: OVERALL “IN RANK CITY COUNTRY 1 London UK COLLABORATION 2 Paris France 3 Dublin Ireland WITH THE CIVIL 4 Munich Germany 5 Amsterdam Netherlands SOCIETY AND 6 Warsaw Poland 7 Zug Switzerland PRIVATE SECTOR, 8 Shannon Ireland 9 Zurich Switzerland WE AIM TO 10 Berlin Germany 11 Madrid Spain DEVELOP 12 Moscow Russia 13 Helsinki Finland HELSINKI AS A 14 Frankfurt Germany 15 Slough UK PLATFORM FOR 16 Prague Czech Republic INNOVATION, 17 Stryków Poland 18 Oslo Norway INVESTMENTS 19 Barcelona Spain 20 Stockholm Sweden AND NEW 21 Cambridge UK 22 Bucharest Romania TALENT” 23 Newbury UK 24 Espoo Finland JAN VAPAAVUORI, 25 Copenhagen Denmark MAYOR, HELSINKI TOP 25 EUROPEAN REGIONS OF THE FUTURE “THIS LONG-TERM 2020/21: OVERALL RANK REGION COUNTRY SUCCESS MAKES 1 Paris Region France 2 Dublin Region Ireland NORTH RHINE- 3 North Rhine-Westphalia Germany 4 Baden-Württemberg Germany WESTPHALIA 5 Bavaria Germany VERY PROUD AND 6 South-east England UK 7 North Holland Netherlands HIGHLIGHTS 8 Uusimaa Finland 9 Oslo County Norway ONCE AGAIN OUR 10 Scotland UK 11 Canton of Zug Switzerland LEADING ROLE AS 12 Prague Region Czech Republic 13 Canton of Zurich Switzerland AN ATTRACTIVE 14 Hesse Germany 15 Catalonia Spain BUSINESS AND 16 Stockholm County Sweden 17 East of England UK INNOVATION 18 Comunidad de Madrid Spain 19 Hamburg Region Germany HOTSPOT” 20 Greater Copenhagen Denmark PETRA WASSNER, 21 Brabant Netherlands 22 Bratislava Region Slovakia CEO, NRW.INVEST 23 Berlin Region Germany 24 Luxembourg Luxembourg 25 South-West Region Ireland February/March 2020 www.fDiIntelligence.com 5 CITIES WINNERS EUROPEAN CITIES AND REGIONS OF THE FUTURE 2020/21 London maintains European pre-eminence LONDON HAS RETAINED ITS POSITION AS fDi’S EUROPEAN CITY OF THE FUTURE, WHILE PARIS HAS CLIMBED TO SECOND PLACE, KNOCKING DUBLIN INTO THE THIRD SPOT. NAOMI DAVIES REPORTS espite Brexit uncertainty, international destinations. London has held on to its title London is awarded the best major Das the overall European City of European city for Business the Future for 2020/21. The UK capi- Friendliness title because companies tal gave a well-rounded performance can start a business in fewer than five in the review period, topping five out days, and there are more than 80,000 of seven category tables in the major companies in the knowledge-based cities classification. sector in the city. London attracted 2257 FDI pro- jects between October 2014 and Paris rises September 2019, the highest out of all Paris climbs to second place in this 319 cities analysed. North American year’s ranking of European cities, up investors were responsible for almost from third in the 2018/19 study. The half (44%) of the total projects during City of Lights attracted 1054 FDI pro- this period, followed by companies jects between October 2014 and from western Europe (26%) and the September 2019 – the second highest Asia-Pacific region (18%).
Recommended publications
  • Cohesion And/Or Growth? Regional Dimensions of Convergence and Growth in Hungary
    STUDIES Andrea Elekes Cohesion and/or Growth? Regional Dimensions of Convergence and Growth in Hungary SUMMARY: Convergence and territorially balanced economic growth require faster economic growth in weaker regions. It is dif- ficult to decide what measures would strengthen the growth capacity of regions most. Following a brief review of growth the- ories and the growth and catch-up performance of the Hungarian economy, the study focuses on the differences in develop- ment across regions in Hungary. Both the analysis of available statistical data and the calculations in connection with the catch-up rate show that the Hungarian regional development is strongly differentiated, and the so-called centre–periphery relationship can clearly be identified. Growth factors (e.g. human capital and R&D investment, innovation) should be enhanced simultaneously. Cohesion policy can complement and support growth objectives in many areas. Moreover, through the coordination of the innovation and cohesion policies even the trade-off problem between efficiency and convergence may be reduced. KEYWORDS: regional convergence, growth, cohesion, crisis JEL-CODES: F43, R11, R12 Convergence and territorially balanced eco- will be discussed next. The third part focuses nomic growth require a faster increase in on the differences in domestic regional devel- income, employment and economy in weaker opment, primarily through an analysis of the regions than in stronger ones. However, it is statistical data regarding the factors identified rather difficult to decide what measures would in the theoretical section. strengthen the growth capacity of regions Following the mapping of domestic regional Cmost. development, the question arises what role This study is, therefore, essentially searching cohesion policy may play in convergence and in for answers for the following questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007
    23/2009 Compiled by: Hungarian Central Statistical Office www.ksh.hu Issue 23 of Volume III 25 September 2009 Regional disparities of GDP in Hungary, 2007 in Western Transdanubia and Central Transdanubia, respectively. The Contents order of the three regions was unaltered according to regional GDP cal- culations dating back for 14 years. The remaining four regions (lagging 1 Gross domestic product per capita behind the national average by 32%–37%) reached nearly the same level 2 Gross value added each: Southern Transdanubia kept its fourth position for ten years, pre- 3 International comparison ceding Southern Great Plain. Northern Hungary overtook Northern Great Plain in 2004, which order remained unchanged. Charts 4 The per capita indicator changed at different rates region by region in 7 Tables the previous year: the growth was the highest in Central Transdanubia (10%) and the lowest in Western Transdanubia (5%). Differences between regions were similar in the period under review as in 2006. The GDP per capita in the most developed region of the country (Central According to data for 2007 on the regional distribution of gross domes- Hungary) was invariably 2.6 times higher than in the one ranked last tic product regional disparities did not change significantly compared to (Northern Great Plain). Leaving out of consideration the figure for the previous year. Hungary’s gross domestic product measured at cur- Central Hungary – that includes the capital city – Western Transdanubia rent purchase prices amounted to HUF 25,479 billion in 2007, nearly the has the highest GDP per capita, which differs from the indicator value of half (47%) of which was produced in Central Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Comparison
    Effective Cross-border Co-operation for Development of Employment Growths in Arad and Békés County – Labour Market Comparison 2019 ROHU 406: CROSSGROWING Effective cross-border co-operation for development of employment growths in Arad and Békés County Békés County Foundation for Enterprise Development The content of this study does not necessarily represent the official position of the European Union. The project was implemented under the Interreg V-A Romania-Hungary Programme, and is financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund, Romania and Hungary. Copyright © 2019 BMVA. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 5 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 14 3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH ........................................... 19 3.1. The labour market as an area of intervention ....................................................... 19 3.1.1. Production factors, supply and demand in the labour market ....................... 21 3.1.2. Unemployment and labour shortages ............................................................ 25 3.1.3. Employment and employment policy .............................................................. 31 3.2. System of cross-border cooperation ..................................................................... 37 3.2.1. Theories and principles of cross-border cooperation ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • EU Mapping of Child Protection Systems Lot 16
    Report of Various Sizes (FRANET) EU mapping of child protection systems Lot 16 – Hungary 2 April 2014 Contents I. Legislative framework and policy developments ................................................... 2 II. Structures and Actors ...................................................................................... 41 III. Capacities ...................................................................................................... 77 IV. Care ........................................................................................................... 91 V. Accountability ............................................................................................... 118 References ........................................................................................................ 166 Annex – Terms and definitions ............................................................................. 183 1 I. Legislative framework and policy developments 1. Overview of the normative framework of the national child protection system. 1. Normative framework: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UN CRC) was ratified in 1991 in Hungary1. The new Child Protection Act in accordance with the CRC came into force in November of 19972. Its main goal is to promote the best interests, the protection and wellbeing of children. The normative framework ensures the well- being and the protection of children from violence, exploitation, abuse, neglect, trafficking, child labour, and child separation. The children’s’ rights approach
    [Show full text]
  • The Child Protection System, 2010
    12/2011 Produced by: Hungarian Central Statistical Office www.ksh.hu Issue 6 of Volume 12 29 July 2011 The child protection system, 2010 Contents 1 The construction of the child protective system The members are: – hygienic service providers (doctors, district nurses) 1 Child welfare services – social institutions – educational institutions 2 The notary’s function in child protection – day time provision (nursery) – police – public prosecutor's department, court – social organisations, church, foundation In 2010, 108 minors at risk per thousand inhabitants of corresponding – patron custodial service age were registered at public guardianship authorities in Hungary. They – citizens live in family, but the child welfare services can help them and ease their – notary everyday life. Basic provision shall contribute to the promotion of the physical, intellectual, emotional and moral development, welfare and Figure 2 upbringing of the child in a family environment, the prevention and Distribution of calls sent through the child protective system by elimination of existing endangerment. members, %, 2010 Every second minors at risk was endangered for environmental reasons. There are huge regional differences in the country: Educational institution Figure 1 Number of minors at risk per thousand inhabitants of Notary corresponding age, by counties, 2010 District nurses Police Social institution Citizen Patron custodial serv ice Day time prov ision Doctor 42.0– 53.8 Other 53.9– 81.2 81.3 – 113.2 113.3 – 144.9 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 % 145.0 – 248.2 Child protection in Hungary is not only a moral but also a legal obligation. The specialists working in the institutions signal the observed problem The tasks of the members of the child protection system prescribed by to the child welfare service.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Hungary REGIONAL REPORT on IS 31TH JULY 2010
    Northern Hungary REGIONAL REPORT ON IS 31TH JULY 2010 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DLA – Regional Report on IS – Northern Hungary 1 Regional Report on IS - Northern Hungary ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DLA – Regional Report on IS – Northern Hungary 2 Regional Report on IS - Northern Hungary CONTENTS CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Socio-economic data ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Regional SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................. 13 2. The Information Society in Region: information and data .................................................................... 15 2.1 Diffusion of the main instruments .............................................................................................. 15 2.1.1 Use of the PC.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Kézirat Elkészítésére Vonatkozó Előírások
    Integrated Regional Development /Theoretical Textbook/ Integrated Regional Development /Theoretical Textbook/ Written by: Béla Baranyi University of Debrecen Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management Edited by: Béla Baranyi Reviewed by: Gábor Zongor Hungarian Association of Settlement Local Governments Translated by: Krisztina Kormosné Koch University of Debrecen Faculty of Applied University of Pannonia Economics and Rural Faculty of Georgikon Development University of Debrecen, Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences • Debrecen, 2013 © Béla Baranyi, 2013 2 Manuscript finished: June 15, 2013 ISBN ISBN 978-615-5183-85-0 UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMIC SCIENCES This publication is supported by the project numbered TÁMOP-4.1.2.A/1-11/1-2011-0029. 3 TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. The Objective, Content and Methodology of Regional Development ............................. 8 1.1. Integrated Regional Development ................................................................................... 8 1.2. Regional Sciences ......................................................................................................... 10 1.3. Integrated Regional Development and Related Definitions .......................................... 15 1.4. Control Questions .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Verejná Politika Ako Nástroj Znižovaní Regionálnych Disparít Public Policy As a Tool to Decrease Regional Disparities
    Verejná politika ako nástroj znižovaní regionálnych disparít Public Policy as a Tool to Decrease Regional Disparities Anna Čepelová, Milan Douša Abstract Scope of this article is content analysis of regional disparities in Hungary in regions at NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 level with main focus on social disparities, as well as evaluation of possible solutions of regional disparities by national regional policies and by Cohesion Policy of the European Union in Programming Period 2014-2020. General part of the article clarifies functioning of regional structure of Hungary and regional disparities as recognized by Cohesion Policy. Second part of this article is dedicated to differences among regions at NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 levels in Hungary based on analysis of unemployment rate and in consideration of their development. Presented contribution is part of solution of Project VEGA č.1/00302/18 „Smart cities as a possibility for implementation of the concept of sustainable urban development in the Slovak Republic“. Keywords: european regional cooperation, nuts nomenclature, cohesion policy, regional policy, regional disparities Introduction As well as there are economic, social and territorial differences between the Member States of the European Union, there are also differences in each Member State at regional level. These differences are also apparent in Hungary and Slovakia, as both countries have regions whose overall socio-economic level does not correspond to the national average. These differences are known as regional disparities which are defined as "unjustified regional differences in level of economic, social and ecological development of the regions". In case of Hungary, the largest disparities are apparent among the region with the capital city and eastern peripheral regions, and among the regions bordering with southern and eastern regions of Slovakia.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Distribution of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 2010 (Preliminary Data) May 2012
    © Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP), 2010 (preliminary data) May 2012 Contents Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010 (preliminary data) ....................2 Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1 Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP), 2007–2010 ..........................6 Table 2 Per capita gross domestic product (GDP), 2007–2010 .............................................. 8 Table 3 Order of counties and regions on the basis of GDP per capita, 2007–2010 ............... 9 Table 4 Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in PPS, 2007–2010 ................................ 10 Table 5 Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in PPS, EU-27=100, 2007–2010 .............11 Table 6 Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as a percentage of national average, 2007–2010 ................................................................................. 12 Table 7 Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as a percentage of counties’ average, 2007–2010 ............................................................................... 13 Table 8 Classifi cation of per capita gross domestic product of counties according to difference from counties’ average, 2009–2010 ..................................14 Table 9 Gross value added by industries, at current prices, 2007 .........................................15 Table 10 Gross value added by industries,
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Distribution of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2011 (Preliminary Data) June 2013
    © Hungarian Central Statistical Office Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2011 (preliminary data) June 2013 Contents Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2011 ................................................. 2 Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Regional distribution of gross domestic product, 2009–2011 ............................................... 6 2. Per capita gross domestic product (GDP), 2009–2011 ........................................................ 8 3. Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in PPS, 2009–2011 ............................................ 9 4. Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as a percentage of national and counties’ average, 2009–2011 ................................................................ 10 5. Classification of per capita GDP of counties by difference from counties’ average, 2010–2011 ..........................................................................................11 6. Gross value added by industries at current prices, 2010 ................................................... 12 7. Gross value added by industries at current prices, 2011 .................................................... 13 Methodological notes................................................................................................................ 14 Contact details www.ksh.hu Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2011 (preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Papers
    CENTRE FOR REGIONAL STUDIES OF HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES DISCUSSION PAPERS No. 53 Idealistic Vision or Reality? Life-long Learning Among the Romany Ethnic Groups by Éva G. FEKETE – Judit T. HARGITAI – Krisztina JÁSZ – Tibor SZARVÁK – Zsolt SZOBOSZLAI Series editor Zoltán GÁL Pécs 2006 Other contributors: Judit Palotai, assistant Dóra Szoboszlai, university student Tibor Sz őcs, instructor Zita Sz őcsné Kovács, instructor 70 survey assistants Project leader, editor: Zsolt Szoboszlai, sociologist ISSN 0238–2008 ISBN 10: 963 9052 69 8 ISBN 13: 978 963 9052 69 7 2006 by Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Technical editor: Ilona Csapó Printed in Hungary by Sümegi Nyomdaipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Ltd., Pécs. 2 CONTENTS I Some characteristics of the Romany ethnic group in Hungary ................................... 7 1 The situation of the Romany ethnic groups in Hungary ......................................... 9 II Life-long learning: European practices of the model of life-long learning ............... 12 1 The model of life-long learning ............................................................................ 12 2 Summary of statements arising from the literature review ................................... 16 2.1 On life-long learning...................................................................................... 16 2.1.1 The necessity and concepts of life-long learning ................................ 16 2.1.2 European citizens and life-long learning.............................................
    [Show full text]