Abstract Book Progeo 2Ed 20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

10th International ProGEO online Symposium

ABSTRACT BOOK

BUILDING CONNECTIONS FOR GLOBAL GEOCONSERVATION

Editors

Gonzalo Lozano, Javier Luengo, Ana Cabrera and Juana Vegas

Instituto Geológico y Minero de España
2021

Building connections for global geoconservation. X International ProGEO Symposium Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 2021 Lengua/s: Inglés NIPO: 836-21-003-8 ISBN: 978-84-9138-112-9 Gratuita / Unitaria / En línea / pdf

© INSTITUTO GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO DE ESPAÑA Ríos Rosas, 23. 28003 MADRID (SPAIN)

ISBN: 978-84-9138-112-9

10th International ProGEO Online Symposium. June, 2021. Abstracts Book. Editors: Gonzalo Lozano, Javier Luengo, Ana Cabrera and Juana Vegas Symposium Logo design: María José Torres Cover Photo: Granitic Tor. Geosite: Ortigosa del Monte’s nubbin (Segovia, Spain). Author: Gonzalo Lozano. Cover Design: Javier Luengo and Gonzalo Lozano Layout and typesetting: Ana Cabrera

10th International ProGEO Online Symposium
2021

Organizing Committee, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España:

Juana Vegas
Enrique Díaz-Martínez
Ana Cabrera
Andrés Díez-Herrero
Gonzalo Lozano Javier Luengo

  • Luis Carcavilla
  • Ángel Salazar Rincón

Scientific Committee:

Daniel Ballesteros Eduardo Barrón
José Brilha
Margaret Brocx Viola Bruschi
Inés Galindo Ewa Glowniak Marcela Gómez
Silvia Menéndez Fernando Miranda Manu Monge Ganuzas

  • Kevin Page
  • Maria Helena Henriques

  • Asier Hilario
  • Paulo Pereira

  • Carles Canet
  • Gergely Horváth

Tapio Kananoja
Jerónimo López-Martínez
Ljerka Marjanac Álvaro Márquez
Esther Martín-González
Isabel Rábano Joao Rocha Ana Rodrigo Jonas Satkünas Martina Stupar Marina Vdovets
Thais Canesin Tom Casadevall Graciela Delvene Lars Erikstad
Esperanza Fernández

PRESENTATION

The first international meeting on geoconservation was held in The Netherlands in 1988, with the presence of seven European countries. One of the outputs of this meeting was the establishment of the European Working Group on Earth Science Conservation, which evolved into ProGEO by 1993. Since then, 33 years have passed during which the discipline of Geoheritage has been consolidated worldwide, making Geoconservation a reality. The great advances achieved have materialized in specific legislation for geological heritage and geodiversity, the creation of the UNESCO Global Geoparks Program, the International Commission on Geoheritage (International Union of Geological Sciences), and the Geoheritage Experts Group of IUCN. It is within this international framework that ProGEO will this year 2021 become a worldwide scientific organization.

The Geological and Mining Institute of Spain (IGME) has extensive experience in geoconservation, dating back to the 1970s. IGME was the organizer of the 3rd ProGEO Symposium in 1999 at Madrid, and is now once again the organizer of this 10th ProGEO

Symposium, with the motto “Building Connections for Global Geoconservation”. We all would

have liked to celebrate this Symposium in Segovia, as it had originally been planned for 2020, enjoying the architecture, gastronomy and night life of this beautiful city. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we had to postpone its celebration to 2021, and the global circumstances further forced a change of plans, obliging to carry out the Symposium fully virtual (online), adapting to the new reality, but also free of charge, thanks to the contributions of ProGEO and IGME.

Far from being an obstacle, this online Symposium has facilitated the participation of more than 400 attendees from 58 different countries, with the presentation of 147 abstracts that are included in this book into 7 scientific sessions dedicated to: 1) inventories and research; 2) management and conservation; 3) education and public outreach; 4) geotourism, UNESCO Global Geoparks and local development; 5) geoconservation in protected areas; 6) moveable geoheritage; and 7) geoheritage and cultural heritage.

We hope that the next ProGEO Symposium can be held with the entire scientific community in full contact, sharing experiences and knowledge of geoheritage and geoconservation on real geosites, and sharing moments together as we had always done. Opening doors to a global reality, with new countries and new colleagues, will be one of the best achievements of our international association after the Declaration of the 'Rights of the Memory of the Earth', written and approved at Digne-les-Bains (France) in 1991, 30 years ago:

Our history and the history of the Earth cannot be separated.
Its origins are our origins, its history is our history, and its future will be our future.

Ana María Alonso Zarza

Director Geological and Mining Institute of Spain/Instituto Geológico y Minero de España
(IGME-CSIC)

V

INDEX

PRESENTATION…………………………………………………………………….. INVENTORIES AND RESEARCH …………………………………………………
V1

Living landscape of the anhydrite wheathering zone at Dingwall (SE Canada) –

documentation and conservation. Adrian Jarzyna , Maciej Bąbel, Damian Ługowski &

Firouz Vladi ………………………………………………………………………..……

3
The Spanish Inventory of Sites of Geological Interest (IELIG). Ángel García-Cortés,

Juana Vegas, Luis Carcavilla & Enrique Díaz- Martínez ……………………………

57

Assessment of geotouristic potential vs tourists’ preferences. Case study: Podtatrze area

(southern Poland, northern Slovakia). Anna Chrobak……………………………. Geosite valorization of Ohrid-Prespa Transboundary Biosphere Reserve. Ardiana Miçi

& Florina Pazari………………………………………………………………..…….

9
Applying Evenness Measures to Geodiversity and Geomorphodiversity Evaluation.

Borut Stojilk ović ……………………………………………………………………….

11 13
The Geosite of Aguas Blancas (Jujuy, Argentina). Corrado Cencetti & Felipe Rafael

Rivelli….…………………………………………………………………………………

Methodological discussion concerning inventory and assessment of geomorphosites:

An integrated approach. Daniel Souza dos Santos, Kátia Leite Mansur, José Carlos Sícoli Seoane, Vanessa Costa Mucivuna & Emmanuel Reynard……………………..

15 17
The inventory of the geosites and landscapes of aspiring. Narman geopark area,

Erzurum, Turkey. Direnç Azaz …………………………………………………………

Inventories of geomorphological heritage: a review of the Brazilian scientific

publications. Eliana Mazzucato, Vanessa da Costa Mucivuna, Denise de La Corte Bacci & Maria da Glória Motta Garcia……………………………………………..………

19 21
Inventory of geosites in the Rio Grande do Norte state: first steps towards a geoheritage

database for the North-East Brazil. Filipe Freire Alencar, Marília Cristina Santos Souza Dias, Ítalo Mendonça Nascimento Barbalho & Marcos Antônio Leite do

Nascimento………………….………………………………………..………………….

Geological Heritage of Navarra: a new proposal for an inventory of sites of geological interest and its application as an educational resource. Fran Sanz & Juana

Vegas……………………………………………………………………………………

23
National Geosites Inventory of Chile: preliminary results from compilation and

homogenization stages. Francisca Salazar D., Felipe Fuentes C. & Manuel Arenas A….

25 27 29 31
Natural area “Predurale” – the object of Geoheritage of the Perm Region (Russia). G.

Yu. Ponomareva, D. N. Slashchev & I. S. Khopta ………………………………………

Geodiversity of Montenegro as a Precondition and Manifestation of its Geoheritage.

Gojko R. Nikolic………………………………………………………………………...

Assessing landscape-scale geodiversity across Finland. Helena Tukiainen & Jan

Hjort…………………………………………………………………………………….

Feedback on twelve years work on the national geoheritage inventory in France: results

and advances for geosite protection. Isabelle Rouget, Grégoire Egoroff & Claire de

Kermadec……………………………………………………………………………......

33 35
Geoheritage associated with rifting as natural analogue for geological sequestration of CO2 in the Kivu region (Democratic Republic of Congo). Jean Nacishali Nteranya ….

Tectonic geoheritage as a forgotten opportunity to use it for natural hazard resilience – Lessons from the Kaikoura 2016 Earthquake, New Zealand. Károly Németh, Boxin Li,

Boglárka Németh & Vlad Zakharovskyi ………………………………………………..

37 39

Mapping geosites in Albania. Ledi Moisiu, Adil Neziraj & Albert Avxhi………............

Occurrence and genesis of waterfall calc tufa deposits from semi-arid Upland Deccan Traps, India: proxies for paleoclimate and monsoon record. Madhuri S. Ukey &

Ravindrasinh G. Pardeshi ………………………………………………………………

41 43
Representative and unique geosites of the Russian Caucasus. Marina S. Vdovets &

Valery Ja. Vuks …………………………………………………………………….......

Spit inventory of the eastern Mediterranean region and risk assessment for the

vulnerable geosites in Turkey. N. Kazancı, A . Gürbüz, Y. Suludere, A. Özgüneylioğlu, N. S. Mülazımoğlu, S. Boyraz-Arslan, E. Gürbüz, F. Şaroğlu, E. Günok &

TO.Yücel……..…………………………………………………………………………..

45 47
The Atlantic puzzle: a contribution from Angola to global geoheritage. Nair Sousa,

Octávio Mateus, Anne S. Schulp, Michael J. Polcyn, António Olímpio Gonçalves and

Louis L. Jacobs….………………………………………………………………………

Need of inventory and preservation of the Tete Fossil Forest: a recognition of the largest

fossil forest in Africa. Nelson Nhamutole, Marcelino Moiana, Marion Bamford, Ricardo Araújo, Juana Vegas & Enrique Díaz-Martínez…………………………….....

49 51
Granite blockfields of Seoraksan, Republic of Korea – diversity and geoheritage values.

Piotr Migoń, Marek Kasprzak & Kyung Sik Woo…………………………………….....

Putting Geoheritage on the map in Luxembourg: the ‘Mëllerdall’ (aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark) and ‘Minett’ (UNESCO Biosphere Reserve). Robert Weis & Birgit Kausch…………………………………………………………………………………...

53
Hydrogeological geosites in the Amur Region (Russia): scientific assesment and

protection. Tatiana Ivanova……………………………………………………………..

55 57 59 61 63
Registration and assessment of geosites: Results and implications of a Norwegian study.

Tine Larsen Angvik, Rolv Magne Dahl & Tom Helda…………………………………..

Polluted karst underground of Mountainous Croatia. Valerija Butorac, Ruđer Novak &

Nenad Buzjak……………………………………………………………………………

Geodiversity Model of Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi

& Károly Németh………………………………………………………………………...

The HSGME (Greece) Geosites geoinformation system. Zananiri Irene, Barsaki

Vasiliki & Moraiti Evgenia………………………………………………………………

  • MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION…………………………………………
  • 65

Assessing the geological heritage of the Mancha Húmeda Biosphere Reserve under climate change effects with focus on the El Taray pond (Cuenca, Spain). África de la

Hera-Portillo, Leticia Baena-Ruíz, David Pulido-Velázquez, Antonio Juan Collados- Lara & Juan de Dios Gómez-Gómez……………………………………………………

67
Establishing management priorities for Geoconservation in Cajón del Maipo Geopark

project, Chile. Camilo Vergara Daskam & Cristóbal Estay Daskam……………………

69 71
Threatened, damaged or destroyed geoheritage – challenge and opportunity in England.

Colin D. Prosser……………………………………………………………...................

Geodiversity index maps and watersheds as tools to select priority areas: example of the

coast of São Paulo, Brazil. Debora Silva Queiroz & Maria da Glória Motta

Garcia…………………………………………………………………………………..

73
Anthropogenic impacts affecting the conservation of the geoheritage of Barranco de los

Encantados (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands). Esther Martín-González, Juana Vegas, Carmen Romero, Nieves Sánchez & Inés Galindo………………………………………

75 77
Geomorphological heritage of sandstone areas in SW Poland – conservation and

interpretation issues. Filip Duszyński & Piotr Migoń……………………………………

The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa. A transdiciplinary approach to science,

conservation, education, tourism, and art. Ilmars Gravis, Károly Németh & Chris

Twemlow………………..……………………………………………………………….

79
Positive changes on conservation of an active spring mineral deposit in Dos Aguas Geosite during the COVID´19 confinement (Taburiente Caldera National Park, La

Palma, Canary Islands). Inés Galindo, Juana Vegas, José Heriberto Lorenzo, Esther Martín-González, Nieves Sánchez & Carmen Romero…………………………………

81 83
Carrying capacity of Azores UNESCO Global Geopark (UGGp) geosites for touristic

use: an approach. João Carlos Nunes, Rodrigo Cordeiro, Priscila Santos & Sara

Medeiros………………………………………………………………………………...

Geoheritage and cultural value at risk in the Mata de Baixo village, Alvaiázere,

Portugal. João Paulo Forte. ……………………………………………………………

85 87
The "Save a Rock" program at COP25: citizen science to raise awareness about the impact of climate change on geoconservation. Juana Vegas, Ana Cabrera, Gonzalo

Lozano, Andrés Díez-Herrero, Luis Carcavilla, Enrique Díaz-Martínez, Alicia González, Javier Luengo, Angel Salazar & Ángel García-Cortés………………………

Restoration of a geological landscape in the high Arctic, Svalbard, Norway. Lars

Erikstad & Dagmar Hagen………………………………………………………………

89
The long protection process of the Toarcian-Aalenian Gssp at the Molina-Alto Tajo Unesco Global Geopark (Guadalajara, Central Spain). Luis Carcavilla, Juan Manuel

Monasterio, Antonio Goy, Soledad Ureta, Amelia Calonge García, Enrique Díaz Martínez, Lucía Enjuto, Stanley C. Finney, Ángel García-Cortés, Ismael Pardos, Isabel Rábano, Yolanda Sánchez-Moya, Carlos Serrano, Alfonso Sopeña, Juana Vegas, José Antonio Lozano & José Antonio Martínez………………………………………………

91 93 95
Tourist caves in Slovenia in terms of their nature conservation and management.

Martina Stupar, Mina Dobravc & Ljudmila Strahovnik………………………….……..

Geoheritage, land-use planning and the sad case of Donald Trump’s Scottish golf course. Murray Gray……………………………………………………………………

Cultural ecosystem services of geodiversity and awareness-raising on geoconservation: a perspective from the Ceará Central Domain, North-eastern Brazil. Pâmella Moura &

Maria da Glória Motta Garcia…………………………………………………………..

97 99
Provisional indicators for abiotic nature The development of abiotic services assessment

methodology in two UNESCO Global Geoparks. Sara Gentilini, Pål Thjømøe & Marco

Giardino ……………………………………………..………...……….……………….

Monitoring challenges on coastal areas with high geoheritage in the absence of a management plan: Case study on Jurassic of the Peniche Peninsula (Portugal). Thais S

Canesin , Paulo Pereira , Juana Vegas & Luís Vítor Duarte ……………………………

101
Erratic boulders from Scandinavia: peculiarities of management and geoconservation

in Lithuania. V idas Mikulėnas & Jonas Satkūnas……………………………………….

103 105 107
Considering a UNESCO management framework for the Quebrada de Humahuaca area,

Jujuy Province – Northern Argentina. Walter Medina & Guillermo Aceñolaza………..

Monadnocks in the local spatial planning; the case of Jerzmanowice-Przeginia municipality (Cracow Upland, Poland). Wiktor Głowacki………………………………

  • EDUCATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH…………………………………………
  • 109

Geodiversity perception: an overview from the Brazilian geosites Parque Geológico Varvito, Caverna do Diabo and Pico do Itapeva, São Paulo State. Andrea Duarte

Cañizares, Christine Laure Marie Bourotte

Garcia…………………………………………………………………………………..

  • &
  • Maria da Glória Motta

111
ELIGES: scientific criteria for selecting 10 areas of urban geosites for environmental

awareness and geotourism in Segovia (Spain). Andrés Díez-Herrero & Juana Vegas

113 115

Soil as an important feature of geoheritage. Anna Masseroli, Irene M. Bollati, Luca Trombino & Manuela Pelfini…………………………………………………………

A citizen science program to report fresh outcrops: a new tool to appropriate geological

heritage in France. Asma Seinhausser, Grégoire Egoroff, Alicia Mansilla-Sanchez, Lydia Detienne & Isabelle Rouget………………………………………….…………

117 119
Outreach of reports on mountaineering activities on social networks for environmental awareness and education: the case of the Catas Altas – Morro da Água Quente Trail –

Brazil. Bruno Batista de Negreiros & Rosangela Garrido Machado Botelho………….

Research and outreach potential of digital products in geoconservation: examples from

the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Carlos Eduardo Manjon Mazoca, Maria da Glória Motta Garcia & Renato Henriques…………………………………………………………...

121 123
Public Outreach for Decision Support at Mount Saint Helens National Monument, USA.

Daniel Tormey…………………………………………………………………………..

Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro University (Vila Real, North of Portugal): a Space of

Public Outreach of Geology. David Martín Freire-Lista, Javier Eduardo Becerra Becerra & Mila Simões de Abreu………………………………………………………

125
Geointegration of webmaps and multimedia elements for the representation of databases in Geosciences: Case study of Talhados’s viewpoint, Alagoas – Brazil.

Ivaneide de Oliveira Santos, Gorki Mariano & Renato Henriques…………………….

127

  • 129
  • The Atlantic Jigsaw Puzzle in art, outcrop, and fossils. John Jackson…………………

International Geodiversity Day: developing a global outreach initiative. José Brilha,

Murray Gray, Jack Matthews & Zbigniew Zwoliński……………………………….….

131
Scientific Knowledge, Education and Dissemination of the Quaternary Deposits in the

Galician Coast (NW Spain). Manuela Costa-Casais, Andrés Domínguez-Almansa & Daniel Cajade-Pascual…………………………………………………………………

133 135
How to make geology more attractive for a public through online presentation? Markéta

Vajskebrová, Martina Fifernová, Martin Lisec & Radek Svítil………….....…………..

Places for geoeducation and geocommunication in a touristic cluster and their contributions to geoconservation in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: preliminary

assessment. Maxwell Luiz da Ponte & Joseli Maria Piranha…………………………..

137
‘ELIGE un LIG’. A project for promotion and conservation of geoheritage. Nuria

Sacristán-Arroyo, Alberto Díez-Herrero & Sara González-Álvaro…………………….

139 141 143
Grasping the wide picture of geoheritage: an example of the Pleistocene glacial

geodiversity of Poland. Paweł Wolniewicz……………………………………………..

Seeking public engagement with Geodiversity. Rodrigues, J., Costa e Silva, E. &

Pereira, D. I.……………………………………………………………………………

SWOT analysis of geo-educational tourism in Lushan Geopark, China. Shi Ying &

Elena De Uña-Álvarez………………………………………………………………….

145 147 149 151
Geoheritage in the United States: National Parks and more. Thomas Casadevall, Terri

Cook, Tim Connors, David Mogk & Ester Sztein……………………………………….

Pleistocene erratic boulders as geotourism and educational sites: a case study from

Toruń (Poland). Tomasz Karasiewicz & Agata Chróścicka…………………………….

Geo-Education Development in Khon Kaen Geopark, Thailand. Vimoltip Singtuen &

Natcharee Vivitkul………………………………………………………………………

  • GEOTOURISM, UG GEOPARKS AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT…………….
  • 153

Can the rocks sing? A complete learning experience on the thematic trail “Music of Nature” in Hateg Country UNESCO Global Geopark (Romania). Adina-Maria Popa,

Dan Horațiu Popa, Alexandru Andrășanu & Simona Delia Meliță…………………….

155

  • 157
  • Geotourism Trends in Albania at the beginning 21-st Century. Afat Serjani…………..

Geosites and geoeducational value of the Świślina River Valley in the Holy Cross

Mountains, Poland. Anna Fijałkowska - Mader, Wiesław Trela & Karolina Bieńko….

159 161
Spanish UNESCO Global Geoparks: an overview of 20 years growing. Asier Hilario,

Luis Carcavilla & Elena Mateo………………………………………………………….

3GEO – Geoclimbing and Geotrekking in Geoparks: sustainable practices for enhancing the tourist and education experience. Irene Maria Bollati, Jasper Knight,

Mohammed Alkindi, Charalampos Fassoulas, Eugenio Fazio, Ricardo Galeno Fraga de Araújo Pereira, Manuel García – Rodríguez, Hugo Gomes, Manuel Schilling, Cristina Viani, Anna Masseroli, Giuseppe Maria Amato, Tiziana Apuani, Patricia Azevedo, Tullio Bagnati, Enrique Fernandez Escalante, Martina Forzese, Marco Giardino, Manuela Pelfini, Enrico Zanoletti & Michele Zucali………………………..

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
  • Towards Threshold Values for Nutrients : Petrifying Springs in South-Limburg

    Towards Threshold Values for Nutrients : Petrifying Springs in South-Limburg

    Towards threshold values for nutrients; Petrifying springs in South-Limburg (NL) in a Northwest European context Final report Stichting EcologocialRestorationAdvice Foundation Ontwikkeling en Beheer Natuurkwaliteit 2 © 2016 VBNE, Vereniging van Bos- en Natuurterreineigenaren Rapport OBN2016/OBN210-HE Driebergen, 2016 Dit onderzoek is financieel mogelijk gemaakt door de Provincie Limburg Teksten mogen alleen worden overgenomen met bronvermelding. Deze uitgave kan schriftelijk of per e-mail worden besteld bij het VBNE onder vermelding van code OBN2016/210-HE en het aantal exemplaren. Oplage 75 Samenstelling Dr. Hans de Mars (Royal HaskoningDHV) Drs. Bas van der Weijden (Royal HaskoningDHV) Drs. Gijs van Dijk (B-WARE) Prof. dr. Fons Smolders (B-WARE / Radboud University Nijmegen) Prof. dr. Ab Grootjans (ERA Foundation / University Groningen / Radboud University Nijmegen) Prof. dr. Lesław Wołejko (West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin) Druk KNNV Uitgeverij/Publishing Foto voorkant Terzieter Bronnetjesbos, Epen. Fotograaf: Hans de Mars Productie VBNE, Vereniging voor Bos- en Natuurterreineigenaren Adres : Princenhof Park 9, 3972 NG, Driebergen Telefoon : 0343-745250 E-mail : [email protected] Ontwikkeling en Beheer Natuurkwaliteit 3 Voorwoord Het doel van het Kennisnetwerk Ontwikkeling en Beheer Natuurkwaliteit (OBN1) is het ontwikkelen, verspreiden en benutten van kennis voor terreinbeheerders over natuurherstel, Natura 2000, PAS, leefgebiedenbenadering en ontwikkeling van nieuwe natuur. In het kader van Natura 2000 zijn in Europees perspectief zeldzame soorten en vegetatietypen in Nederland beschermd. In dit rapport staan de (prioritaire) “Kalktufbronnen” (H7220) centraal. Dit bijzondere habitat type, dat in ons land uitsluitend in enkele Natura2000 gebieden in Zuid-Limburg voorkomt, ligt veelal ingebed in bronbossen (H91Eo-c). Omdat dit type hier zelden grote oppervlakten inneemt waren tot voor kort de kalktufbronnen voor veel mensen een onbekend fenomeen.
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania

    Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania

    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
  • State Geological Map of Ukraine

    State Geological Map of Ukraine

    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION OF UKRAINE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NORTHERN STATE REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL ENTERPRISE "PIVNICHGEOLOGIA" STATE GEOLOGICAL MAP OF UKRAINE Scale 1:200 000 CENTRAL-UKRAINIAN SERIES Map Sheet M-35-XXII (STAROKOSTYANTYNIV) EXPLANATORY NOTES Compiled by: V.V.Lukash (responsible executive), E.V.Gadyuchka, O.G.Lisnyak, G.G.Vynogradov, K.M.Perelygin, Z.P.Okhynko, N.K.Grytsenko, L.V.Bedrak, A.V.Fedorov Editors: A.S.Voynovskiy, S.S.Derkach Expert of Scientific-Editorial Council: P.F.Bratslavskiy (UkrSGRI) English Translation (2010): B.I.Malyuk Kyiv - 2007 (2010) UDC [560.81/.82 + 502.51/.53] (477.41-37) + (477.45/46-37) The State Geological Map of Ukraine in the scale 1:200 000, map sheet M-35-XXII (Starokostyantyniv). Explanatory Notes. Kyiv: State Geological Survey, Northern State Regional Geological Enterprise "Pivnichgeologia", 2007. – English translation. – Kyiv: UkrSGRI, 2010. – 171 p. Authors: V.V.Lukash (responsible executive), E.V.Gadyuchka, O.G.Lisnyak, G.G.Vynogradov, K.M.Perelygin, Z.P.Okhynko, N.K.Grytsenko, L.V.Bedrak, A.V.Fedorov Editors: A.S.Voynovskiy, Candidate of Geological-Mineralogical Sciences, S.S.Derkach Expert of Scientific-Editorial Council P.F.Bratslavskiy, Ordinary Scientist, UkrSGRI English translation (2010) B.I.Malyuk, Doctor Hab. of Geological-Mineralogical Sciences, UkrSGRI In the explanatory notes geological data are summarized obtained after previously published edition of the medium-scale maps, updated and systematized in the course of extended geological study in the scale 1:200 000 in the map sheet M-35-XXII (Starokostyantyniv). Description is given for geological map and map of mineral resources of pre-Quaternary units, geological map and map of mineral resources of Quaternary sediments, geological map and map of mineral resources of crystalline basement, geological map of pre- Mesozoic units.
  • A Comprehensive Review Article on Haridru (Adina Cordifolia Hook F)

    A Comprehensive Review Article on Haridru (Adina Cordifolia Hook F)

    wjpmr, 2021,7(9), 128 – 132. SJIF Impact Factor: 5.922 WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL Review Article Ritu et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research AND MEDICAL RESEARCH ISSN 2455-3301 www.wjpmr.com WJPMR A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ARTICLE ON HARIDRU (ADINA CORDIFOLIA HOOK F) Dr. Ritu*1, Naveen Kumar2, Dr. Kulbhushan3 and Dr. Satya Dev Pandey4 1Assistant Professor in Department of Dravyaguna Vigyana, at DBACH, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab. 2B.A.M.S. Student of 2nd year at DBACH, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab. 3Professor in Department of Swathvritta, at DBACH, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab. 4Professor in Department of Kaya Chikitsa, at DBACH, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab. *Corresponding Author: Dr. Ritu Assistant Professor in Department of Dravyaguna Vigyana, at DBACH, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab. Article Received on 16/06/2021 Article Revised on 06/07/2021 Article Accepted on 26/07/2021 ABSTRACT Ayurveda a deep ocean with lots of medicinal gems, whether these are known or unknown. Some of its gems are controversial due to their morphological structure and lack of knowledge. Here we are trying to describe Haridru as a separate drug with its medicinal importance. As we know Ayurveda is a life science which deals with about every Dravya present in universe. Haridru is a plant having medicinal importance in Ayurveda but generally explains as a variety of Kadamba or Kadamba itself in many classical texts. We are trying to compile the data which proves that Haridru is a separate drug neither Kadamba nor its variety on the basis of its morphology, properties & actions as per Ayurveda. This study may be helpful for further researchers for conducting their studies because it‟s controversial kind of drug having not much research on this.
  • Challenges of the Albanian Legislation on the Protection of Biodiversity

    Challenges of the Albanian Legislation on the Protection of Biodiversity

    Environment and Ecology Research 4(2): 79-87, 2016 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/eer.2016.040205 Challenges of the Albanian Legislation on the Protection of Biodiversity Erjon Muharremaj Faculty of Law, University of Tirana, Albania Copyright©2016 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract This paper strives to offer a brief overview of Albanian Sea Turtle (Pelophylax shqipericus) and the the challenges that Albania faces in its efforts to complete its Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio), for which Albania is of special legislation on the protection of biodiversity. It starts with a importance. [1] short introduction of the situation of the diverse flora and Unfortunately, the damages caused to the biodiversity are fauna of the country, and continues with an overview of the numerous, such as the loss and fragmentation of the habitats, legal framework for the protection of biodiversity in Albania. damage, impoverishment and degradation of ecosystems and Analyzing the efforts to harmonize its domestic legislation habitats, extinction of wild animals in their natural habitats, with the international environmental treaties, and because of etc. The losses in biodiversity in Albania in the last 50 years the European integration process, with the acquis are rated as among the highest in Europe. Damages have communautaire, the paper goes through the gradual changes been caused even from the intensive gathering of medicinal that have been made in the Albanian legislation. Because of plants, where Albania is ranked as the second exporter in their particularly important role on the biodiversity Europe.
  • Back Matter (PDF)

    Back Matter (PDF)

    Index Figures are shown in italic font, tables in bold Acrodontinae 99, 101–102 Buddha’s cortege 245 Actinopterygii 127, 130 burial temperature 63 adocid 143–144, 147, 148 Adocus [turtle] 166, 167 comparison, Basilochelys 155–158, 163–165 calc-alkaline volcanism 61 amber locality 86,88 calcrete 77 Ameghinichthys [fish] 129 Callialisporites [palynomorph] 72, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81 ammonites 48, 52 Carettochelyidae 166, 167 amphibian remains 2–3 Cathaysia Divide 10–12 anhydrite 70 Cathaysialand 8, 9, 15, 20 Anomoeodus [fish] 136 fauna 12–14 Anomoepodidae 264, 265, 266 flora 16 Anomoepus [ichnofossil] 256, 258, 261, 262–264 Ceno-Tethys 8, 12, 19,20 comparison 264, 265–267 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Ao Min, fish locality 98, 99 (France) 190 apatite 63 Champon Formation 50 Appendicisporites [palynomorph] 76,77 Chelomoidea 166, 167 Araucaria [tree] 85, 88, 92, 93 Chelonia 274, 293 Archaeornithomimus [theropod] 237–240 Chelydridae 166, 167 archosaur trackway 247 chert 18, 20 Argoland 12, 13 Chondrichthyes 98–99 Aruacariacites [palynomorph] 74 Chong Chad, oxygen isotope analysis 272, Asteracanthus [elasmobranch] 99–101 274, 275, 276, 277 comparison 101–102 Chong Chat, fish locality 127, 130, 131, 137 Asterodermus [elasmobranch] 107 Chuiella, distribution of 15 Cicatricosisporites [palynomorph] 75, 76, 77, 79 Cimmerian continent 8, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20 Baenidae 166, 167 Cimmerian Event 44, 46, 47, 51, 64 Ban Khok Sanam locality 272, 274, 276 cladistic analysis Ban Na Khrai, sauropod site 189, 190, 192, 195–214 actinopterygians 130 Ban Na
  • Perception of Local Geographical Specificity by the Population of Podolia

    Perception of Local Geographical Specificity by the Population of Podolia

    88 ЕКОНОМІЧНА ТА СОЦІАЛЬНА ГЕОГРАФІЯ PERCEPTION OF LOCAL GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIFICITY BY THE POPULATION OF PODOLIA Oleksiy GNATIUK Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine [email protected] Abstract: The article reveals the perception of local geographical specificity by the population of Podolia. Attention is focused on five elements of the local geographical specificity: natural, historical and cultural monuments; prominent personalities; trademarks and producers of goods and services; the origin settlement names; figurative poetic names of settlements. The tasks were the following: to determine basic qualitative and quantitative parameters of regional image-geographical systems, to find the main regularities of their spatial organization, and, finally, to classify administrative-territorial units of the region according to the basic properties of image-geographic systems using specially worked out method. Analysis made it clear that the population of Podolia is characterized by a high level of reflection of the local geographic specificity. Local image-geographical systems from different parts of the region have different structure and level of development. In particular, image-geographical systems in Vinnytsia and Ternopil oblasts are well developed, stable and hierarchized, in Khmelnitskyi oblast it is just developing, dynamic and so quite unstable. To further disclosure the regularities and patterns of local geographical specificity perception, it is advisable to carry out case studies of image-geographic systems at the level of individual settlements. Key words: territorial identity, local geographical specificity, geographic image UDC: 911.3 СПРИЙНЯТТЯ МІСЦЕВОЇ ГЕОГРАФІЧНОЇ СПЕЦИФІКИ НАСЕЛЕННЯМ ПОДІЛЛЯ Олексій ГНАТЮК Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, Україна [email protected] Анотація: У статті розглянуто сприйняття місцевої географічної специфіки населенням Подільського регіону.
  • Angola: Museum in the Ground

    Angola: Museum in the Ground

    ANGOLA: MUSEUM IN THE GROUND Good Fossils Ocean Currents and Source Rocks Dinosaur Extinction (K-Pg Boundary) Angolasaurus (90 million year old marine lizard, also found in Texas) Louis L. Jacobs Roy M. Huffington Department of Earth Sciences Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas InIn 20052005 wewe wentwent toto AngolaAngola becausebecause fossilsfossils ofof giantgiant marinemarine lizardslizards (mosasaurs)(mosasaurs) hadhad beenbeen reportedreported inin thethe 1960’s.1960’s. CouldCould wewe findfind more?more? ColleaguesColleagues atat UniversidadeUniversidade Agostinho Agostinho Neto Neto were were contactedcontacted andand wewe brieflybriefly visitedvisited thethe field.field. BasedBased onon ourour preliminarypreliminary trip,trip, thethe NationalNational GeographicGeographic SocietySociety andand thethe PetroleumPetroleum ResearchResearch FundFund ofof thethe AmericanAmerican ChemicalChemical SocietySociety fundedfunded expeditionsexpeditions inin 20062006 andand 2007.2007. In cooperation with Universidade Agostinho Neto and ISPRA (Lubango). We have shown that: 1. The fossils of Angola are a “Museum in the Ground.” 2. The geologic context of the fossils gives clues to past ocean currents and productivity leading to petroleum source rocks. 3. The rocks of Angola record events of worldwide interest, such as the extinction of mosasaurs and dinosaurs, and the precise position of ancient shores. IEMBE (north of Luanda) 90 million years old Drawing of original specimen, 1964 Home of Discovery site of Angolasaurus in 1962 Angolasaurus Discovery site in 2006 The best specimen, 2006 Ammonite in Iembe cliff Angolasaurus before excavation Excavation of front flipper of Angolasaurus (note ammonite lying next to fingers) Shark Vertebrae, Iembe, 90 Million Years The first dinosaur, a sauropod, found in Angola, at Iembe. Excavation pit for front leg of sauropod dinosaur Professor Jacobs (SMU) excavating arm bone of Angolan dinosaur Unexcavated Turtle Skull BENTIABA 68 Ma, 15ºS Each red point is a good fossil.
  • CO-CHAIRS' SUMMARY REPORT 2ND ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM WORKSHOP of NATIONAL MARITIME SINGLE POINTS of CONTACT Kuala Lumpur, Malay

    CO-CHAIRS' SUMMARY REPORT 2ND ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM WORKSHOP of NATIONAL MARITIME SINGLE POINTS of CONTACT Kuala Lumpur, Malay

    FINAL CO-CHAIRS’ SUMMARY REPORT 2ND ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM WORKSHOP OF NATIONAL MARITIME SINGLE POINTS OF CONTACT Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27-29 August 2018 INTRODUCTION 1. The 2nd ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) Workshop of National Maritime Single Points of Contact (NMSPOC) was held from 27 to 29 August 2018 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, as approved by the 24th ARF Ministerial Meeting on 7 August 2017 in Manila, the Philippines. It served as a follow-up to the previous ARF NMSPOC Workshops, including the ARF NMSPOC Workshop held from 28 to 29 April 2016 in Cebu City, the Philippines, during which it was agreed that the NMSPOC concept has merit in the ASEAN context and should be pursued further. Therefore, the purpose of this 2nd Workshop was to further define the idea of a NMSPOC by identifying and sharing best practices in inter-agency cooperation, coordination, and information sharing. 2. The Workshop was co-chaired by Dr. Adina Kamarudin, Director-General, Maritime Affairs Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Malaysia; Dr. Christopher Merritt, Maritime Technical Advisor, the United States Mission to ASEAN in Jakarta; and Commander Christopher Waters, Regional Director of South East Asia, Australian Border Force in Jakarta. 3. Representatives from ARF Member States (Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam) as well as Australia, Canada, China, Japan, Pakistan, Russia, Timor Leste, the United States and the ASEAN Secretariat participated in the Workshop. The Programme of Activities appears as Annex 1, and the List of Participants as Annex 2. SESSION 1 – OPENING CEREMONY : CO-CHAIRS’ INTRODUCTION AND WELCOMING REMARKS Page 1 of 11 FINAL 4.
  • Evaluating Mitigation Plans Over Traffic Sector to Improve NO2 Levels in Andalusia (Spain) Using a Regional-Local Scale Photochemical Modelling System

    Evaluating Mitigation Plans Over Traffic Sector to Improve NO2 Levels in Andalusia (Spain) Using a Regional-Local Scale Photochemical Modelling System

    Open Journal of Air Pollution, 2014, 3, 70-86 Published Online September 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojap http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojap.2014.33008 Evaluating Mitigation Plans over Traffic Sector to Improve NO2 Levels in Andalusia (Spain) Using a Regional-Local Scale Photochemical Modelling System Raúl Arasa1, Antonio Lozano-García2, Bernat Codina1,3 1Air Quality Department, Meteosim S.L., Barcelona, Spain 2Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Seville, Spain 3Department of Astronomy and Meteorology, Barcelona, Spain Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 5 August 2014; revised 1 September 2014; accepted 17 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract In this contribution, we present an evaluation of different mitigation plans to improve NO2 levels in Andalusia, a region in the south of Spain. Specifically, we consider four possible mitigation plans: the effects over NO2 concentration of apply changes in the distribution of Vehicles Park; the effect of realize traffic restrictions (affecting to the density flow of vehicles) over highways and main roads; the effect of replacement of diesel use by natural gas in urban areas; and the effect of ap- plying new velocity limits to access to urban areas. A sophisticated air quality modelling (AQM) system has been used to evaluate these mitigation plans. AQM implemented is composed on WRF meteorological model, an emission model created by the authors and CMAQ photochemical model. AQM analyzes mitigation plans during fifteen episodes of 2011 where NO2 levels were the highest of the year; so we analyze the effect of mitigation plans in worst conditions.
  • The Human Imprint on the Unique Geological Landscape of the Western Caucasus

    The Human Imprint on the Unique Geological Landscape of the Western Caucasus

    Anna V. Mikhailenko et al. Geologos 26, 3 (2020): 233–244 DOI: 10.2478/logos-2020-0022 The human imprint on the unique geological landscape of the Western Caucasus Anna V. Mikhailenko1, Dmitry A. Ruban2,3*, Svetlana O. Zorina4, Konstantin I. Nikashin4, Natalia N. Yashalova5 1Institute of Earth Sciences, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russia 2K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (The First Cossack University), Zemlyanoy Val Street 73, Moscow 109004, Russia 3Department of Hospitality Business, Higher School of Business, Southern Federal University, 23-ja Linija Street 43, Rostov-on-Don 344019, Russia (postal address: P.O. Box 7333, Rostov-on-Don 344056, Russia) 4 Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya Street 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420008, Russia 5Department of Economics and Management, Business School, Cherepovets State University, Sovetskiy Avenue 10, Cherepovets, Vologda Region 162600, Russia *corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Human intervention in the geological environment is commonly thought to pose a threat to geoheritage. However, new information from the Western Caucasus where unique geological features are concentrated in Mountainous Ady- geya, implies that man-made features in fact add value to geoheritage. Such features include a lengthy artificial niche in the Guama Gorge, accumulations of large artificial clasts along the road leading to the Lagonaki Highland and the Khadzhokh Quarry with the artificial Red Lake. These contribute to the regional uniqueness of geosites and can be classified as geomorphological, sedimentary, economical and hydro(geo)logical geoheritage types. Interestingly, these artificial features have natural analogues in the study area.