African Development Bank Group
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP MOZAMBIQUE NATIONAL RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROGRAM (PRONASAR) IN NAMPULA AND ZAMBEZIA PROVINCES PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT (PCR) Public Disclosure Authorized RDGS/AHWS December 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT AFRICAN FOR PUBLIC SECTOR OPERATIONS (PCR) DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP I BASIC DATA A Report data Report date Date of report: November 30th 2017 Mission date (if field mission) From: November 26th 2017 To: 30th November 2017 Field district visit was done from 9th to 16th November 2017 B Responsible Bank staff Positions At approval At completion Regional Director Frank BLACK Mrs Josephine NGURE Country Manager Alice HAMER Joseph RIBEIRO Sector Director Ali KIES Osward CHANDA Sector Manager Sering B. JALLOW Noel KULEMEKA Task Manager Boniface ALEOBUA Boniface ALEOBUA Alternate Task Manager - - PCR Team Leader Eskendir A DEMISSIE Mecuria ASSEFAW; Yolanda ARCELINA, PCR Team Members Boniface ALEOBUA and Pedro SIMONE C Program data Program name: National Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Program (PRONASAR) in Nampula and Zambezia Provinces Program code: P-MZ-E00-008 Instrument number(s): ADB 5800155000601 & ADF 2100150023298 Program type: GRANT & LOAN Sector: Water and Sanitation Country: Mozambique Environmental categorization (1-3): 2 Processing milestones – Bank approved Key Events (Bank approved financing Disbursement and closing dates financing only (add/delete rows depending on only) (Bank approved financing only) the number of financing sources) Financing source/ instrument1: Financing source/ instrument1: Financing source/ instrument1: RWSSI TF Grant € 6,000,000 NA NA Cancelled amounts: Original disbursement deadline: Date approved: 09 November 2010 NA 31 December 2015 Original closing date: 31 December Date signed: 06 December 2010 Supplementary financing: UA0.0 2015 Revised (if applicable) disbursement Date of entry into force: Restructuring (specify date & amount deadline: 06 December 2010 involved): NA 30 September 2017 1 Extensions (specify dates): Date effective for 1st disbursement: 06 Revised (if applicable) closing date: 31 December 2016, 30 June 2017 and December 2010 30 September 2017 30 September 2017 Date of actual 1st disbursement: 16 July 2012 Financing source/ instrument2: ADF Loan Financing source/ instrument2: Financing source/ instrument2: UA 5,270,000 NA NA Cancelled amounts: Original disbursement deadline: Date approved: 09 November 2010 NA 31 December 2015 Original closing date: 31 December Date signed: 06 December 2010 Supplementary financing: UA 0.0 2015 Date of entry into force: Restructuring (specify date & amount Revised (if applicable) disbursement 27 June 2011 involved): NA deadline: 30 September 2017 Extensions (specify dates): Date effective for 1st disbursement: : 02 Revised (if applicable) closing date: 31 December 2016, 30 June 2017 and February 2012 30 September 2017 30 September 2017 Date of actual 1st disbursement: 06 November 2013 Financing source/instrument (add/delete rows Disbursed amount Percentage Undisbursed Percentage depending on the number of financing sources): (amount, Euro/UA): disbursed (%): amount undisbursed (Euro/UA): (%): Financing source/ instrument1: € 5,745,066.71 95.75% € 254,933.29 4.25% RWSSI TF Grant Euro 6,000,000 Financing source/ instrument2: UA 5,040,324.34 95.64% UA 229,675.66 4.36% ADF Loan UA 5,270,000 Government: MZN51,811,728.00 MZN 23827509.75 46% MZN 27,984,218.25 54.00% Community: MZN37,240,000 MZN206,000,000 553% - - Other (eg. co-financiers). Add rows as needed NA NA NA NA NA TOTAL: UA 12,699,768 (Exchange PAR) UA1 12,483,921 98% UA2 768,576 6% Financing source/instrument (add/delete rows Committed amount Percentage Uncommitted Percentage depending on the number of financing sources): (UA): committed amount (UA): uncommitted (%): (%): Financing source/ instrument1: 5,967,667.62 99.5% 32,332.38 0.54% Financing source/ instrument2: 5,141,004.70 97.55% 128,995.30 2.45% Government: MZN 23,827,509.75 NA NA NA Other (eg. co-financiers). Add rows as needed. NA NA NA NA TOTAL NA NA NA NA Co-financiers and other external partners: NA Executing and implementing agency (ies): Covered taxes and running costs. 1 Exchange rate at PCR 2 Exchange rate at PCR 2 D Management review and comments Report reviewed by Name Date reviewed Comments Country Manager Joseph RIBEIRO Sector Manager Noel KULUMEKA Regional Director (as chair of Country Josephine NGURE Team) Sector Director Osward CHANDA (OIC) II Program performance assessment A Relevance 1. Relevance of program development objective Rating* Narrative assessment (max 250 words) The program was prepared at the final stage of implementation of CSP 2006-2009, which had two pillars (Pillar 1 - Governance & Pillar 2 - infrastructure). The program was designed in line with the second objective of the pillar 2 which included increasing access to water and sanitation services. Then the program was mainly implemented during the CSP 2011 - 2015 period, under pillar 1 - Enhanced Private Sector Competitiveness Through Infrastructure Development, which included water and sanitation as one of its main objectives, and the national rural water supply and sanitation program (PRONASAR) expected outputs were reflected in the CSP 2011-2015. The program was also aligned with government objectives as expressed through its various planning instruments, including “ Second Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper 2006-2009” (under implementation at program preparation stage), which had water and sanitation as one of three objectives of the Human Capital Pillar; the Government Five-Year Program 2010- 2014 (program implementation period) had water and sanitation as its main objective under the Human and Social 4 Development Pillar, both designed to implement the vision of achieving MDG objectives of 69% and 48% coverage in rural water supply and rural sanitation, respectively by 2015. The Bank-financed program supported a specific government national programme, PRONASAR, aimed at boosting services coverage and sustainability through coordinated implementation between the government and development partners. The Bank’s component of the Program was implemented in Nampula and Zambezia provinces; while other partners supported other program components and provinces. The provinces and their districts which received Bank’s support were at the bottom in terms of service coverage nationally and therefore it was a vehicle to narrow the uneven service coverage in the country. PRONASAR was the first sectoral program jointly implemented by the development partners in the water sector, and was conceptually designed by an AWF operation and the Bank supported technical assistance along with other partners through its inception phase. * For all ratings in the PCR use the following scale: 4 (Highly satisfactory), 3 (Satisfactory), 2 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Highly unsatisfactory) 2. Relevance of program design Rating* Narrative assessment (max 250 words) Program design was consistent in addressing the challenges faced by the rural communities and the institutions themselves, and during its implementation no major deviations to the initial design were observed. At PRONASAR design stage, government claimed rural water coverage was estimated at 54% and rural sanitation at 39%; although the actual figures were much lower as revealed at a later stage. Functioning water infrastructures were below 85% and about 40% of the government interventions were in rehabilitating existing infrastructures; and about 40% of sanitation infrastructures delivered by the communities requires further improvement to raise their standards. The program design included the 4 delivery of water infrastructures; awareness and education campaigns to foster construction of improved household sanitation infrastructures and management capability at decentralized government structures and community level, which were consistently delivered without major deviations during project implementation. Program design took into account government efforts of consolidating the decentralization process, which were consistently delivered without major deviations during project duration bringing the implementation of most of the activities to provincial level, and providing necessary institutional capacity development to provincial and district level through trainings and delivery of necessary equipment (water monitoring equipment, computers, vehicles and motorbikes). 3 While the program was designed to be implemented in a SWAP arrangement, the Bank supported it through parallel financing owing to the experience of previous Bank financing, unliquidated Special Account and concerns on fiduciary risks. The program also incorporated a range of technology options to be adopted in line with the conditions or particular circumstance of the areas and beneficiaries. It included water points, piped water systems, de-salination units and these were either powered by solar, grid electricity or diesel generator, There were minor challenges at implementation stage, specifically with regard to the design of Zambezia Small Piped Systems (SPS) water sources, which are showing limitation to supply water throughout the year (yields drops to nil during dry seasons) and the adoption of diesel generator for power supply to Riane SPS, Nampula province, resulting in high operational costs, and leading to reduced daily supply time. 3. Lessons learned related to relevance Key issues Lessons learned Target audience (max 5, add rows as needed) 1. Total alignment of the The