2006, Pp. 419-430 a KEY for the IDENTIFICATION of AMANITA SPECIES, SECT. VAGINATAE, SUBSEC
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita
1170 Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita I5ichael Weiß, Zhu-Liang Yang, and Franz Oberwinkler Abstracl A group of 49 Amanita species that had been thoroughly examined morphologically and amtomically was analyzed by DNA sequence compadson to estimate natural groups and phylogenetic rclationships within the genus. Nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit were determined and evaluated using neighbor-joining with bootstrap analysis, parsimony analysis, conditional clustering, and maximum likelihood methods, Sections Amanita, Caesarea, Vaginatae, Validae, Phalloideae, and Amidella were substantially confirmed as monophyletic groups, while the monophyly of section Lepidell.t remained unclear. Branching topologies between and within sections could also pafiially be derived. Stbgenera Amanita an'd Lepidella were not supported. The Mappae group was included in section Validae. Grouping hypotheses obtained by DNA analyses are discussed in relation to the distribution of morphological and anatomical chamcters in the studied species. Key words: fungi, basidiomycetes phylogeny, Agarrcales, Amanita systematics, large subunit rDNA, 28S. R6sum6 : A partir d'un groupe de 49 esp,ces d'Amanita prdalablement examinees morphologiquement et anatomiquement, les auteurs ont utilisd la comparaison des s€quences d'ADN pour ddfinir les groupes naturels et les relations phylog6ndtiques de ce genre. Les sdquences de I'ADN nucl6aire codant pour une partie de la grande sous-unit6 ribosomale ont 6t6 ddterminEes et €valu6es en utilisant l'analyse par liaison en lacet avec le voisin (neighbor-joining with bootstrap), l'analyse en parcimonie, le rcgroupement conditionnel et les m€thodes de ressemblance maximale. Les rdsultats confirment substantiellement les sections Afiarira, Caesarea, Uaqinatae, Ualidae, Phalloideae et Amidella, comme groupes monophyldtiques, alors que la monophylie de la section Lepidella demerxe obscure. -
Biodiverse Master
Montane, Heath and Bog Habitats MONTANE, HEATH AND BOG HABITATS CONTENTS Montane, heath and bog introduction . 66 Opportunities for action in the Cairngorms . 66 The main montane, heath and bog biodiversity issues . 68 Main threats to UK montane, heath and bog Priority species in the Cairngorms . 72 UK Priority species and Locally important species accounts . 73 Cairngorms montane, heath and bog habitat accounts: • Montane . 84 • Upland heath . 87 • Blanket bog . 97 • Raised bog . 99 ‘Key’ Cairngorms montane, heath and bog species . 100 65 The Cairngorms Local Biodiversity Action Plan MONTANE, HEATH AND BOG INTRODUCTION Around one third of the Cairngorms Partnership area is over 600-650m above sea level (above the natural woodland line, although this is variable from place to place.). This comprises the largest and highest area of montane habitat in Britain, much of which is in a relatively pristine condition. It contains the main summits and plateaux with their associated corries, rocky cliffs, crags, boulder fields, scree slopes and the higher parts of some glens and passes. The vegeta- tion is influenced by factors such as exposure, snow cover and soil type. The main zone is considered to be one of the most spectacular mountain areas in Britain and is recognised nationally and internationally for the quality of its geology, geomorphology and topographic features, and associated soils and biodiversity. c14.5% of the Cairngorms Partnership area (75,000ha) is land above 600m asl. Upland heathland is the most extensive habitat type in the Cairngorms Partnership area, covering c41% of the area, frequently in mosaics with blanket bog. -
Amanita Nivalis
Lost and Found Fungi Datasheet Amanita nivalis WHAT TO LOOK FOR? A white to greyish to pale grey/yellow-brown mushroom, cap 4 to 8 cm diameter, growing in association with the creeping Salix herbacea (“dwarf willow” or “least willow”), on mountain peaks and plateaus at altitudes of ~700+ m. Distinctive field characters include the presence of a volva (sac) at the base; a cylindrical stalk lacking a ring (although sometimes an ephemeral ring can be present); white to cream gills; striations on the cap margin to 1/3 of the radius; and sometimes remnants of a white veil still attached on the top of the cap. WHEN TO LOOK? Amanita nivalis, images © D.A. Evans In GB from August to late September, very rarely in July or October. WHERE TO LOOK? Mountain summits, and upland and montane heaths, where Salix herbacea is present (see here for the NBN distribution map of S. herbacea). A moderate number of sites are known, mostly in Scotland, but also seven sites in England in the Lake District, and four sites in Snowdonia, Wales. Many Scottish sites have not been revisited in recent years, and nearby suitable habitats may not have been investigated. Further suitable habitats could be present in mountain regions throughout Scotland; the Lake District, Pennines and Yorkshire Dales in England; and Snowdonia and the Brecon Beacons in Wales. Amanita nivalis, with Salix herbacea visible in the foreground. Image © E.M. Holden Salix herbacea – known distribution Amanita nivalis – known distribution Map Map dataMap data © National Biodiversity Network 2015 Network Biodiversity National © © 2015 GeoBasis - DE/BKG DE/BKG ( © 2009 ), ), Google Pre-1965 1965-2015 Pre-1965 1965-2014 During LAFF project Amanita nivalis Associations General description Almost always found with Salix herbacea. -
The Genus Amanita 3Huv ,1/80%,1,=21( Nepal
THE GENUS AMANITA 3HUV ,1/80%,1,=21( NEPAL Hari Prasad Aryal * and Usha Budhathoki ** 3DNOLKDZD&DPSXV,QVWLWXWHRI$JULFXOWXUHDQG$QLPDO6FLHQFH%KDLUDKDZD &HQWUDO'HSDUWPHQWRI%RWDQ\7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\.LUWLSXU.DWKPDQGX1HSDO Abstract: 'XULQJWKHVXUYH\RIZLOGHGLEOHPXVKURRPVLQWURSLFDOWRWHPSHUDWHEHOWRI1HSDOGXULQJUDLQ\VHDVRQVLQ DQGPDQ\PDFURIXQJDOVSHFLHVZHUHFROOHFWHGDQGLGHQWL¿HG7KHSDSHUKLJKOLJKWVRQWKH¿YHVSHFLHVRI genus Amanita 3HUVLQFOXGLQJQHZVSHFLHV Amanita volvata 3HFN /OR\G ZLWKWKHLULGHQWL¿FDWLRQDQGGRFXPHQWDWLRQ The new species was LGHQWL¿HGDQGWKLVLVEHLQJUHSRUWHGDQGUHGHVFULEHGIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHIURP1HSDO Amanita characterized by stipe with volva or rudiments of volva, annulus present, in some may be absent, clamp connection SUHVHQWRUDEVHQWVSRUHVDP\ORLGRULQDP\ORLG7KHVWXG\DUHDRFFXSLHGVTNPDPRQJWKHVT.PODQG DQGOLHVZLWKLQDQDOWLWXGHEHWZHHQDQGPDVOLQWURSLFDOGHFLGXRXVULYHULQHIRUHVWWRORZHUWHPSHUDWHPL[HG EURDGOHDYHGIRUHVW7KHGULHGVSHFLPHQVDUHKRXVHGLQWKH7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\&HQWUDO+HUEDULXP 78&+ .LUWLSXU .DWKPDQGX1HSDO7KHDUHDHPEUDFHVPDQ\P\FRSKDJRXVHWKQLFFRPPXQLWLHV7KHP\FRHOHPHQWVSUHYDLOLQJLQWKLV DUHDQHHGVXVWDLQDEOHFRQVHUYDWLRQDQGXWLOL]DWLRQ Keywords: Tasonomy; %DVLGLRP\FHWHV Amanita volvata; 0DFURIXQJL INTRODUCTION 7KH LQYHVWLJDWLRQ DQG VWXG\ RQ PXVKURRPV RI 1HSDO started since 19 th FHQWXU\ /OR\G %HUNHOH\ 7KH JHQXV Amanita FRQWDLQV RYHU QDPHG VSHFLHV DQG YDULHWLHV $GKLNDUL et al Amanita IURP1HSDOKDVEHHQUHSRUWHGVLQFH th century (Singh, DE VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDOSDSHUVKDYHEHHQSXEOLVKHG 42 species and 2 subspecies of Amanita are reported IURP1HSDO $GKLNDUL et al VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDO -
Forest Fungi in Ireland
FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix -
Mantar Dergisi
11 6845 - Volume: 20 Issue:1 JOURNAL - E ISSN:2147 - April 20 e TURKEY - KONYA - FUNGUS Research Center JOURNAL OF OF JOURNAL Selçuk Selçuk University Mushroom Application and Selçuk Üniversitesi Mantarcılık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi KONYA-TÜRKİYE MANTAR DERGİSİ E-DERGİ/ e-ISSN:2147-6845 Nisan 2020 Cilt:11 Sayı:1 e-ISSN 2147-6845 Nisan 2020 / Cilt:11/ Sayı:1 April 2020 / Volume:11 / Issue:1 SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ MANTARCILIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ADINA SAHİBİ PROF.DR. GIYASETTİN KAŞIK YAZI İŞLERİ MÜDÜRÜ DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SİNAN ALKAN Haberleşme/Correspondence S.Ü. Mantarcılık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Müdürlüğü Alaaddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi, Fen Fakültesi B Blok, Zemin Kat-42079/Selçuklu-KONYA Tel:(+90)0 332 2233998/ Fax: (+90)0 332 241 24 99 Web: http://mantarcilik.selcuk.edu.tr http://dergipark.gov.tr/mantar E-Posta:[email protected] Yayın Tarihi/Publication Date 27/04/2020 i e-ISSN 2147-6845 Nisan 2020 / Cilt:11/ Sayı:1 / / April 2020 Volume:11 Issue:1 EDİTÖRLER KURULU / EDITORIAL BOARD Prof.Dr. Abdullah KAYA (Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniv.-Karaman) Prof.Dr. Abdulnasır YILDIZ (Dicle Üniv.-Diyarbakır) Prof.Dr. Abdurrahman Usame TAMER (Celal Bayar Üniv.-Manisa) Prof.Dr. Ahmet ASAN (Trakya Üniv.-Edirne) Prof.Dr. Ali ARSLAN (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv.-Van) Prof.Dr. Aysun PEKŞEN (19 Mayıs Üniv.-Samsun) Prof.Dr. A.Dilek AZAZ (Balıkesir Üniv.-Balıkesir) Prof.Dr. Ayşen ÖZDEMİR TÜRK (Anadolu Üniv.- Eskişehir) Prof.Dr. Beyza ENER (Uludağ Üniv.Bursa) Prof.Dr. Cvetomir M. DENCHEV (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaristan) Prof.Dr. Celaleddin ÖZTÜRK (Selçuk Üniv.-Konya) Prof.Dr. Ertuğrul SESLİ (Trabzon Üniv.-Trabzon) Prof.Dr. -
Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in Minnesota's Ancient and Younger Stands of Red Pine and Northern Hardwood-Conifer Forests
DIVERSITY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN MINNESOTA'S ANCIENT AND YOUNGER STANDS OF RED PINE AND NORTHERN HARDWOOD-CONIFER FORESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY PATRICK ROBERT LEACOCK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DAVID J. MCLAUGHLIN, ADVISER OCTOBER 1997 DIVERSITY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN MINNESOTA'S ANCIENT AND YOUNGER STANDS OF RED PINE AND NORTHERN HARDWOOD-CONIFER FORESTS COPYRIGHT Patrick Robert Leacock 1997 Saint Paul, Minnesota ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to Dr. David J. McLaughlin for being an admirable adviser, teacher, and editor. I thank Dave for his guidance and insight on this research and for assistance with identifications. I am grateful for the friendship and support of many graduate students, especially Beth Frieders, Becky Knowles, and Bev Weddle, who assisted with research. I thank undergraduate student assistants Dustine Robin and Tom Shay and school teacher participants Dan Bale, Geri Nelson, and Judith Olson. I also thank the faculty and staff of the Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, for their assistance and support. I extend my most sincere thanks and gratitude to Judy Kenney and Adele Mehta for their dedication in the field during four years of mushroom counting and tree measuring. I thank Anna Gerenday for her support and help with identifications. I thank Joe Ammirati, Tim Baroni, Greg Mueller, and Clark Ovrebo, for their kind aid with identifications. I am indebted to Rich Baker and Kurt Rusterholz of the Natural Heritage Program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, for providing the opportunity for this research. -
Species List for Arizona Mushroom Society White Mountains Foray August 11-13, 2016
Species List for Arizona Mushroom Society White Mountains Foray August 11-13, 2016 **Agaricus sylvicola grp (woodland Agaricus, possibly A. chionodermus, slight yellowing, no bulb, almond odor) Agaricus semotus Albatrellus ovinus (orange brown frequently cracked cap, white pores) **Albatrellus sp. (smooth gray cap, tiny white pores) **Amanita muscaria supsp. flavivolvata (red cap with yellow warts) **Amanita muscaria var. guessowii aka Amanita chrysoblema (yellow cap with white warts) **Amanita “stannea” (tin cap grisette) **Amanita fulva grp.(tawny grisette, possibly A. “nishidae”) **Amanita gemmata grp. Amanita pantherina multisquamosa **Amanita rubescens grp. (all parts reddening) **Amanita section Amanita (ring and bulb, orange staining volval sac) Amanita section Caesare (prov. name Amanita cochiseana) Amanita section Lepidella (limbatulae) **Amanita section Vaginatae (golden grisette) Amanita umbrinolenta grp. (slender, ringed cap grisette) **Armillaria solidipes (honey mushroom) Artomyces pyxidatus (whitish coral on wood with crown tips) *Ascomycota (tiny, grayish/white granular cups on wood) **Auricularia Americana (wood ear) Auriscalpium vulgare Bisporella citrina (bright yellow cups on wood) Boletus barrowsii (white king bolete) Boletus edulis group Boletus rubriceps (red king bolete) Calyptella capula (white fairy lanterns on wood) **Cantharellus sp. (pink tinge to cap, possibly C. roseocanus) **Catathelesma imperiale Chalciporus piperatus Clavariadelphus ligula Clitocybe flavida aka Lepista flavida **Coltrichia sp. Coprinellus -
Fig. D. Pegler, Kew. Fleshy Carpophore Acrophysalidic Tissue Of
PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part 429-442 11, 4, pp. (1982) Studies in Amanita—II. Miscellaneousnotes C. Bas Rijksherbarium, Leiden Two aredescribed in Amanita sect. Amanita viz. A. pulverotecta Bas from new species , southeastern Africa and A. brunneoconulus Bas & Gröger from central Europe. Type A. P. Karst. related to and not to studies are given of hyperborea (a species A. friabilis and A. vaginata), A. vaginata f. oreina J. Favre (a synonym of A. nivalis Greville), A. sternbergii Velen. (a synonym of A. friabilis). 1. AN UNDESCRIBED SPECIES OF AMANITA SECTION AMANITA FROM SOUTHEASTERN AFRICA A specimen of a rather unusual species of Amanita from Malawi was kindly sent to me for D. It identificationby Dr. Pegler, Kew. consists of a single large and rather fleshy carpophore with an exannulateclavatestipe and a dry powdery-granularpileal surface. There does not seem think of the to be any type of volva and therefore the specimen does not immediately make one Amanita. The trama of the lamellae and the tissue of the genus divergent acrophysalidic stipe this The is here nevertheless proof that the species concerned belongs to genus. volva apparently reduced to a thin powdery-granularlayer that owing to a non-gelatinizingpileipellis seem to be part of the pileus itself. available for this remarkable the is based No name being fungus, following new species upon it. — 1 Amanita pulverotecta Bas, spec. nov. Fig. 150 Pileus c. mm latus, piano-convexus, margine laevis, albidus, fragmentis volvae granuliformibusvel pulveraceis, bubalinis ornatus. Lamellae subliberae, albidae vel pallide luteolo-bubalinae; lamellulae probabiliter truncatae. -
Toxic Fungi of Western North America
Toxic Fungi of Western North America by Thomas J. Duffy, MD Published by MykoWeb (www.mykoweb.com) March, 2008 (Web) August, 2008 (PDF) 2 Toxic Fungi of Western North America Copyright © 2008 by Thomas J. Duffy & Michael G. Wood Toxic Fungi of Western North America 3 Contents Introductory Material ........................................................................................... 7 Dedication ............................................................................................................... 7 Preface .................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 7 An Introduction to Mushrooms & Mushroom Poisoning .............................. 9 Introduction and collection of specimens .............................................................. 9 General overview of mushroom poisonings ......................................................... 10 Ecology and general anatomy of fungi ................................................................ 11 Description and habitat of Amanita phalloides and Amanita ocreata .............. 14 History of Amanita ocreata and Amanita phalloides in the West ..................... 18 The classical history of Amanita phalloides and related species ....................... 20 Mushroom poisoning case registry ...................................................................... 21 “Look-Alike” mushrooms ..................................................................................... -
Classification of Amanita Species Based on Bilinear Networks With
agriculture Article Classification of Amanita Species Based on Bilinear Networks with Attention Mechanism Peng Wang, Jiang Liu, Lijia Xu, Peng Huang, Xiong Luo, Yan Hu and Zhiliang Kang * College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625000, China; [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (L.X.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (Y.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-186-0835-1703 Abstract: The accurate classification of Amanita is helpful to its research on biological control and medical value, and it can also prevent mushroom poisoning incidents. In this paper, we constructed the Bilinear convolutional neural networks (B-CNN) with attention mechanism model based on transfer learning to realize the classification of Amanita. When the model is trained, the weight on ImageNet is used for pre-training, and the Adam optimizer is used to update network parameters. In the test process, images of Amanita at different growth stages were used to further test the generalization ability of the model. After comparing our model with other models, the results show that our model greatly reduces the number of parameters while achieving high accuracy (95.2%) and has good generalization ability. It is an efficient classification model, which provides a new option for mushroom classification in areas with limited computing resources. Keywords: deep learning; bilinear convolutional neural networks; attention mechanism; trans- fer learning Citation: Wang, P.; Liu, J.; Xu, L.; Huang, P.; Luo, X.; Hu, Y.; Kang, Z. -
MUSHROOMS of the OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled By
MUSHROOMS OF THE OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled by Dana L. Richter, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI for Ottawa National Forest, Ironwood, MI March, 2011 Introduction There are many thousands of fungi in the Ottawa National Forest filling every possible niche imaginable. A remarkable feature of the fungi is that they are ubiquitous! The mushroom is the large spore-producing structure made by certain fungi. Only a relatively small number of all the fungi in the Ottawa forest ecosystem make mushrooms. Some are distinctive and easily identifiable, while others are cryptic and require microscopic and chemical analyses to accurately name. This is a list of some of the most common and obvious mushrooms that can be found in the Ottawa National Forest, including a few that are uncommon or relatively rare. The mushrooms considered here are within the phyla Ascomycetes – the morel and cup fungi, and Basidiomycetes – the toadstool and shelf-like fungi. There are perhaps 2000 to 3000 mushrooms in the Ottawa, and this is simply a guess, since many species have yet to be discovered or named. This number is based on lists of fungi compiled in areas such as the Huron Mountains of northern Michigan (Richter 2008) and in the state of Wisconsin (Parker 2006). The list contains 227 species from several authoritative sources and from the author’s experience teaching, studying and collecting mushrooms in the northern Great Lakes States for the past thirty years. Although comments on edibility of certain species are given, the author neither endorses nor encourages the eating of wild mushrooms except with extreme caution and with the awareness that some mushrooms may cause life-threatening illness or even death.