DOCSLIB.ORG

Voting Behavior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voting Behavior Populism Questionnaire [country_key] Respondent’s country <840> US <826> UK <208> DK <250> FR <276> DE <380> IT <616> PL <348> HU <203> CZ <703> SK SPLITS Note: splits randomized in the background and not seen by respondents [split_dem] Split on Democratic Importance Question <1> Asked democratic importance question <2> Not asked democratic importance question [split_expert_experiment] Split on Expert/Public Experiment <1> Control <2> Expert <3> Public [split_benefits_experiment] Split on Benefits Experiment <1> Immigrant <2> Native Born [split_gender_deserve_experiment] Split on Gender Deservingness Experiment <1> Female <2> Male [split_gender_relig_experiment] Split on Gendered Religious Exceptionalism Experiment <1> Female <2> Male POPULISM [democracy_importance] How important is it for you to live in a country that is governed democratically? (scale 1-10) Not at all important | Absolutely important [people_elites] Do you agree or disagree with the following statements pertaining to the people and the elites in your country? - The people are under threat and must be protected - The interests of the people are represented well by the political elites - The political elites have the best interests of the nation/people in mind - The political elites are corrupt <1> Agree <2> Disagree <3> Not sure [values] Which statement comes closer to your view? <1> [Americans Britons, etc.] are united and in agreement about the most important values <2> [Americans Britons, etc.] are greatly divided when it comes to the most important values [race_represnt (in the US)] Do you feel that... <1> People are best represented in politics by leaders from their own racial or ethnic background <2> The leader's race or ethnicity doesn't make much difference Note gov_role split into two pages and randomized in script [gov_role] Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - The elites are corrupt - Politicians typically look out for their own interests - The politicians in [Congress/Parliament] need to follow the will of the people - The people, and not politicians, should make our most important policy decisions - The political differences between the elite and the people are larger than the differences among the people - I would rather be represented by a citizen than by an elected official - Politics is ultimately a struggle between good and evil - (In the US) Interest groups have too much influence over political decisions - In a democracy it is important to make compromises among differing viewpoints - It is important to listen to the opinion of other groups - (In the US) Diversity limits my freedom - Our country would be governed better if important decisions were left up to experts - I trust collective judgment of people rather than politicians, even on complex issues <1> Strongly agree <2> Somewhat agree <3> Somewhat disagree <4> Strongly disagree Note instconf split into three pages and randomized in script [instconf] How much confidence do you have in the following institutions? - [Congress/Parliament] - Political parties - The judiciary - The media - Church/religion - (in the UK) The monarchy - Local government - National government - Universities - Unions - Business - (not in the US) The European Union - The police - The United Nations - The medical systems - Public schools - (in US, FR, DE, IT, PL, HU, CZ, SK) The president <1> A lot <2> Some <3> A little <4> None [democracy] How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in [France, Italy, etc.]? <1> Very satisfied <2> Somewhat satisfied <3> Somewhat dissatisfied <4> Very dissatisfied [referendums] Do you think referendums (a direct vote by the electorate to approve or disapprove a proposed law) are a good idea? <1> Yes <2> No <3> Not sure [natl_id (if not in UK)] How important are the following things for being truly [American, French, etc.]? - To have parents or grandparents born in the country - To have been born in the country - To be able to speak [English, French, etc.] - To believe in freedom and equality - (Not asked in CZ) To be a [Christian/Catholic] <1> Very Important <2> Somewhat important <3> Not important [nationalism] Do you agree or disagree with the following statements: - I would rather be a citizen of [Italy, France, etc.] than of any other country in the world - There are some things that make me ashamed of [Italy, France, etc.] <1> Agree strongly <2> Agree somewhat <3> Neutral <4> Disagree somewhat <5> Disagree strongly [benefits_imm (Immigrant Split)] Hassan emigrated to [Poland, Hugary, etc.] from Syria. He is young, single, has no friends or family, and has very few resources. He was recently in a car accident that left him unable to work. He wants to apply for welfare benefits. Should he be allowed to? <1> Yes <2> No [benefits_nat (Native Born Split)] Michael is a native-born [Hungarian, German etc.]. He is young, single, has no friends or family, and has very few resources. He was recently in a car accident that left him unable to work. He wants to apply for welfare benefits. Should he be allowed to? <1> Yes <2> No [gender_deserve_female (Female Split)] Salma is a young woman from the Middle East fleeing violence. She is educated, single, and would like to start a family in [Poland, Hungary, etc.]. Should she be allowed to stay? <1> Yes <2> No [gender_deserve_male (Male Split)] Khaled is a young man from the Middle East fleeing violence. He is educated, single, and would like to start a family in [Poland, Hungary, etc.]. Should he be allowed to stay? <1> Yes <2> No Note Female and Male Splits for this question are independent of those in the question before [gender_relig_female (in IT, FR, PL, SK and Female Split)]John and Mary are a married Catholic couple. They know the Church does not allow In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), but they have been trying to have a child for years without success. Mary desperately wants a child. Should they pursue IVF? <1> Yes <2> No [gender_relig_male (in IT, FR, PL, SK and Male Split)] John and Mary are a married Catholic couple. They know the Church does not allow In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), but they have been trying to have a child for years without success. John desperately wants a child. Should they pursue IVF? <1> Yes <2> No [threat_imm] Is our way of life threatened by immigrants? <1> Yes <2> No <3> Not Sure [immig_fear] Next, we would like to ask you about immigrants who have come from other countries to settle in [Italy, Poland, etc.]. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - Immigrants increase crime rates - Immigrants take jobs away from people born in [Italy, Poland, etc.] - Our national culture is being undermined by immigrants - Most immigrants are hard-working - Muslims want to implement Sharia law - Immigrants strain our welfare system <1> Agree strongly <2> Agree somewhat <3> Neutral <4> Disagree somewhat <5> Disagree strongly Note: Only those prejudices that respondents said were fear in immig_fear are shown in immig_fear_dominant [immig_fear_dominant (if more than one fear expressed in immig_fear)] Which of those fears you selected is your greatest fear? <1> Immigrants increase crime rates <2> Immigrants take jobs away from people born in [Italy, Poland, etc.] <3> Our national culture is being undermined by immigrants <4> Muslims want to enforce Sharia law in their community <5> Immigrants strain our welfare system [prcnt_im] What percentage of the population in [Italy, Poland, etc.] do you believe are immigrants? [prcnt_im_cat] (not asked; coded in background) What percentage of the population in country do you believe are immigrants? <1> 0-9 <2> 10-19 <3> 20-29 <4> 30-39 <5> 40-49 <6> 50-59 <7> 60-69 <8> 70-79 <9> 80-89 <10> 90-100 [prcnt_mslm] What percentage of the population in [Italy, Poland, etc.] do you believe are muslims? [prcnt_mslm_cat] (not asked; coded) What percentage of the population in country do you believe are muslims? <1> 0-9 <2> 10-19 <3> 20-29 <4> 30-39 <5> 40-49 <6> 50-59 <7> 60-69 <8> 70-79 <9> 80-89 <10> 90-100 [prcnt_rich] What percentage of the population in [Italy, Poland, etc.] do you believe are rich? [prcnt_rich_cat] (not asked; coded) What percentage of the population in country do you believe are rich? <1> 0-9 <2> 10-19 <3> 20-29 <4> 30-39 <5> 40-49 <6> 50-59 <7> 60-69 <8> 70-79 <9> 80-89 <10> 90-100 [worries] How worried are you about the following things? - Foreign interference in elections - Threat from immigrants/muslims <1> Very worried <2> Somewhat worried <3> Not worried [worldview] Which comes closest to your view? <1> Our lives are threatened by terrorists, criminals, and illegal immigrants and our priority should be to protect ourselves <2> It's a big, beautiful world, mostly full of good people, and we must find a way to embrace each other and not allow ourselves to become isolated <3> Not sure [repchoice] If you had to choose, would you rather have a member of [Parliament/Congress] who... <1> Compromises to get things done <2> Sticks to their principles, no matter what [trustgovt] How much of the time do you think you can trust the government to do what is right? <1> Just about always <2> Most of the time <3> Some of the time <4> None of the time <5> Not sure [crkedgovt] How many of the people running the government are crooked? <1> Quite a few <2> Not many <3> Hardly any <4> Not sure [lies] How often do politicians lie to be elected? <1> Always <2> Very often <3> Somewhat often <4> Never <5> Not sure [smartgovt] What comes closer to your view? <1> Almost all of the people running the government know what they're doing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initiative of President Andrzej Duda Regarding the Change of the Constitution
    Teka of Political Science and International Relations – OL PAN/UMCS, 2018, 13/1 DOI: 10.17951/teka.2018.13.1.25-34 INITIATIVE OF PRESIDENT ANDRZEJ DUDA REGARDING THE CHANGE OF THE CONSTITUTION Bożena Dziemidok-Olszewska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin Faculty of Political Science, Department of Political Systems e-mail: [email protected] Marta Michalczuk-Wlizło Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin Faculty of Political Science, Department of Political Systems e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The objective of the article is to present and evaluate the initiative of President Andrzej Duda regarding the amendment of the Constitution, with which he appeared on 3 May 2017. The activities and presentations of the President in this regard during the previous year and related problems were all demonstrated. The controversies regarding the presidential initiative were di- vided into legal and political. Legal one is the regulation of the institution of referendum in the Constitution of 1997, the political ones result from the opinion and concepts of parties and citizens about the constitution and referendum in its case. Keywords: change of constitution, president, referendum, political science INTRODUCTION During the last year, from 3 May 2017 to 3 May 2018, we witnessed the, still incomplete, process of President Andrzej Duda’s activities regarding the referendum on the amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The aim of the article is to present and assess the President’s activities in this area, and also to demonstrate the reactions to the President’s initiative. The research question is the justification, meaningfulness and effectiveness of the presidential initiative; the research hypothesis is the claim that the President’s actions are odd and irrational (pointless).
    [Show full text]
  • Emergent Democratic Citizenship : a Study of Changing Value Pa T Terns in Polish Society
    NATO Research Fellowships Programme Emergent democratic citizenship : a study of changing value pa t terns in Polish society. Final Report Wroclaw 1997 Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................. 3-5 Chapter I . OUTLINE OF A THEORY OF CITIZENSHIP a\ The review of basic conceptions of citizenship........................................................... 6-15 · citizenship as a result of a legal status of citizens · citizenship as a set of institutional-normative arrangements · citizenship as a certain mental and cultural structure of individuals and groups b\ methodological foundations of the analysis of citizenship........................................ 15-17 Chapter II . RECEPTION OF THE IDEA OF ‘DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP’ IN POLAND DURING THE 1980s AND 1990s. DIRECTIONS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE a\ Self-devaluating ideas - a brief characteristic of real-socialist order........................... 18-26 · The distorted ideal of citizenship · The basic mechanisms of real-socialist societal order b\ The symbolic representation of social resistance in 1980s........................................... 26-31 Chapter III . POLISH SOCIETY AFTER THE BREAKTHROUGH a\ Institutional and normative changes in Poland after 1989 (macro- and meso-level analysis of democratic citizenship).............................................................................................. 32-41 b\ Political discourse in Poland on dimensions of „democratic citizenship”................
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century French Challenges to the Liberal Image of Russia
    Ezequiel Adamovsky Russia as a Space of Hope: Nineteenth-century French Challenges to the Liberal Image of Russia Introduction Beginning with Montesquieu’s De l’esprit des lois, a particular perception of Russia emerged in France. To the traditional nega- tive image of Russia as a space of brutality and backwardness, Montesquieu now added a new insight into her ‘sociological’ otherness. In De l’esprit des lois Russia was characterized as a space marked by an absence. The missing element in Russian society was the independent intermediate corps that in other parts of Europe were the guardians of freedom. Thus, Russia’s back- wardness was explained by the lack of the very element that made Western Europe’s superiority. A similar conceptual frame was to become predominant in the French liberal tradition’s perception of Russia. After the disillusion in the progressive role of enlight- ened despotism — one must remember here Voltaire and the myth of Peter the Great and Catherine II — the French liberals went back to ‘sociological’ explanations of Russia’s backward- ness. However, for later liberals such as Diderot, Volney, Mably, Levesque or Louis-Philippe de Ségur the missing element was not so much the intermediate corps as the ‘third estate’.1 In the turn of liberalism from noble to bourgeois, the third estate — and later the ‘middle class’ — was thought to be the ‘yeast of freedom’ and the origin of progress and civilization. In the nineteenth century this liberal-bourgeois dichotomy of barbarian Russia (lacking a middle class) vs civilized Western Europe (the home of the middle class) became hegemonic in the mental map of French thought.2 European History Quarterly Copyright © 2003 SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland's 2019 Parliamentary Election
    — SPECIAL REPORT — 11/05/2019 POLAND’S 2019 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse Warsaw Institute POLAND’S 2019 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION Held on October 13, 2019, Poland’s general election is first and foremost a success of democracy, as exemplified by crowds rushing to polling stations and a massive rise in voter turnout. Those that claimed victory were the govern- ment groups that attracted a considerable electorate, winning in more constitu- encies across the country they ruled for the past four years. Opposition parties have earned a majority in the Senate, the upper house of the Polish parliament. A fierce political clash turned into deep chasms throughout the country, and Poland’s political stage reveals polarization between voters that lend support to the incumbent government and those that question the authorities by manifest- ing either left-liberal or far-right sentiments. Election results Poland’s parliamentary election in 2019 attrac- try’s 100-seat Senate, the upper house of the ted the attention of Polish voters both at home parliament, it is the Sejm where the incum- and abroad while drawing media interest all bents have earned a majority of five that has over the world. At stake were the next four a pivotal role in enacting legislation and years in power for Poland’s ruling coalition forming the country’s government2. United Right, led by the Law and Justice party (PiS)1. The ruling coalition won the election, The electoral success of the United Right taking 235 seats in Poland’s 460-seat Sejm, the consisted in mobilizing its supporters to a lower house of the parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Freedom, and Democracy OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, Spi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi Equality, Freedom, and Democracy OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi Equality, Freedom, and Democracy Europe After the Great Recession By LEONARDO MORLINO with DANIELA PIANA MARIO QUARANTA FRANCESCO RANIOLO CECILIA EMMA SOTTILOTTA CLAUDIUS WAGEMANN 1 OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 16/09/20, SPi 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Leonardo Morlino 2020. Some rights reserved. © Chapter 2 © Leonardo Morlino, Claudius Wagemann, and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 3 © Leonardo Morlino and Daniela Piana 2020. Chapter 4 © Leonardo Morlino, Mario Quaranta, and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 5 © Leonardo Morlino and Francesco Raniolo 2020. Chapter 6 © Leonardo Morlino and Daniela Piana 2020. Chapter 7 © Leonardo Morlino, Daniela Piana, and Cecilia Sottilotta 2020. The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2020 Impression: 1 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • American Catholics Radical Response to the Social Gospel Movement and Progressives
    Journal of Catholic Education Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 5 7-2021 Social Reconstruction: American Catholics Radical Response to the Social Gospel Movement and Progressives. Paul Lubienecki, PhD Boland Center for the Study of Labor and Religion Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ce Part of the Adult and Continuing Education Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Labor History Commons, Other Education Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Lubienecki, PhD, P. (2021). Social Reconstruction: American Catholics Radical Response to the Social Gospel Movement and Progressives.. Journal of Catholic Education, 24 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/ joce.2401052021 This Article is brought to you for free with open access by the School of Education at Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for publication in Journal of Catholic Education by the journal's editorial board and has been published on the web by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information about Digital Commons, please contact [email protected]. To contact the editorial board of Journal of Catholic Education, please email [email protected]. Social Reconstruction 83 Journal of Catholic Education Spring 2021, Volume 24, Issue 1, 83-106 This work is licensed under CCBY 4.0. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.2401052021 Social Reconstruction: American Catholics’ Radical Response to the Social Gospel Movement and Progressives Paul Lubienecki1 Abstract: At the fin de siècle the Industrial Revolution created egregious physical, emotional and spiritual conditions for American society and especially for the worker but who would come forward to alleviate those conditions? Protestants implemented their Social Gospel Movement as a pro- posed cure to these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Journal Political Science
    Polish Journal of Political Science Volume 5 Issue 2 (2019) (this page is intentionally left blank) Polish Journal of Political Science Volume 5 Issue 2 Editorial Board Clifford Angell Bates Jr., University of Warsaw Stephen Brooks, University of Michigan Michael Freeden, University of Nottingham, University of Oxford Shpresa Kureta, Her Excellency Ambassador of Albania to Poland Paolo Pombeni, University of Bologna Agostino Massa, University of Genoa Bohdan Szlachta, Jagiellonian University in Krakow Tomasz Żyro, University of Warsaw Chief editor Jarosław Szczepański Editor Karolina Kochańczyk-Bonińska Editorial Secretary Katarzyna Gruszka Paulina Kalina Wydanie bieżącego numeru PJPS – zadanie realizowane w ramach umowy 874/P-DUN/2019 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę. Ministry of Science Wydanie bieżącego numeru PJPS – zadanie realizowane w ramach umowy 874/P-DUN/2019 ze środkówand Higher Ministra Education Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych naRepublic działalność of Polan dupowszechniającą naukę. eISSN 2391-3991 Original version: e-book Visit our site: www.pjps.pl Submit your paper: [email protected] (this page is intentionally left blank) Table of Contents Articles Opeyemi Idowu Aluko Trust and Reputation in Nigeria’s Electoral Process: The Context and Conundrum ................................... p. 7 Daniele Lavezzo Dambisa Moyo: An economist refusing western aid . p. 31 Patrycja Pichnicka Inclusion, integration, assimilation. Conceptions of incorporation of Others and definition of “freedom” in contemporary philosophy and political thought of modern liberal democracies: considerations of philosophers and cultural representations . p. 61 Paweł Paszak China’s technological transformation and the future of Sino-American competition ................................. p. 87 Anna Konarska Environmental impact of mishandlings on tankers .
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Functions of “Solidarity”
    Polish Sociological Review 1 (153)2006 JACEK KURCZEWSKI Warsaw University The Social Functions of “Solidarity” Abstract: The paper from 1981 on the social functions of “Solidarity” is re-published and commented from the 2006 perspective. In the original paper five pairs of the opposed functions were discussed: 1) activation vs. totalisation; 2) unification vs. polarization; 3) civilization of the opponent vs. demystification of the opponent; 4) non-egalitarian egalitarianisation; and 5) institutionalization of the change. In 2006 the author observes the continuing social function of the “Solidarity,” again the conflicting way, as the positive myth that more and more serves as normative reference in current political debates, and as the real political actor that compromised itself through the active participation in politics. The significance of the old functions is discussed in reference to the complexity of non-egalitarian egalitarianism that seems to undermine the whole transformation since 1989 and went to the fore today. The value of the “dialectical functionalism” is thus reasserted. Keywords: “Solidarity,” equality, freedom, transformation The following paper was published 25 years ago under circumstances, which when recalled, shed more light on the context of the events that tend to be forgotten on the way to becoming the domain of conventional historians. From the summer of 1980 until December 1981 the Polish People’s Republic enjoyed an unusual period of political freedom based on economic disaster. The level of tolerance institutionalised, as it then seemed, in the Agreements signed on one part by the government and the other by the Inter-Enterprise Strike Committees in Gdan´sk, Szczecin and Jastrze˛bie gave Poles a touch of freedom excelling even the unusual post-Stalinist liberalisation in October 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging
    What’s Left of the Left What’s Left of the Left Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times Edited by James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Duke University Press Durham and London 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction: The New World of the Center-Left 1 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Part I: Ideas, Projects, and Electoral Realities Social Democracy’s Past and Potential Future 29 Sheri Berman Historical Decline or Change of Scale? 50 The Electoral Dynamics of European Social Democratic Parties, 1950–2009 Gerassimos Moschonas Part II: Varieties of Social Democracy and Liberalism Once Again a Model: 89 Nordic Social Democracy in a Globalized World Jonas Pontusson Embracing Markets, Bonding with America, Trying to Do Good: 116 The Ironies of New Labour James Cronin Reluctantly Center- Left? 141 The French Case Arthur Goldhammer and George Ross The Evolving Democratic Coalition: 162 Prospects and Problems Ruy Teixeira Party Politics and the American Welfare State 188 Christopher Howard Grappling with Globalization: 210 The Democratic Party’s Struggles over International Market Integration James Shoch Part III: New Risks, New Challenges, New Possibilities European Center- Left Parties and New Social Risks: 241 Facing Up to New Policy Challenges Jane Jenson Immigration and the European Left 265 Sofía A. Pérez The Central and Eastern European Left: 290 A Political Family under Construction Jean- Michel De Waele and Sorina Soare European Center- Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration 319 George Ross Conclusion: Progressive Politics in Tough Times 343 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Bibliography 363 About the Contributors 395 Index 399 Acknowledgments The editors of this book have a long and interconnected history, and the book itself has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practice
    STUDY OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE MATTER OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS AND PRACTICES by Arcot Krishnaswami Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities UNITED NATIONS STUDY OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE MATTER OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS AND PRACTICES by Arcot Krishnaswami Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities UNITED NATIONS New York, 1960 Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. E/CN.4/Sub.2/200/Rev. 1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Catalogue No.: 60. XIV. 2 Price: $U.S. 1.00; 7/- stg.; Sw. fr. 4.- (or equivalent in other currencies) NOTE The Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices is the second of a series of studies undertaken by the Sub- Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities with the authorization of the Commission on Human Rights and the Economic and Social Council. A Study of Discrimination in Education, the first of the series, was published in 1957 (Catalogue No. : 57.XIV.3). The Sub-Commission is now preparing studies on discrimination in the matter of political rights, and on discrimination in respect of the right of everyone to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. The views expressed in this study are those of the author. m / \V FOREWORD World-wide interest in ensuring the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion stems from the realization that this right is of primary importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 1979 Complete Book
    Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1979 RAYMOND D. GASTIL With papers by Bohdan R. Bociurkiw Herbert J. Ellison Lewis S. Feuer Teresa Rakowska-Harmstone Published by Freedom House in cooperation with G. K. Hall & Co. G.K.HALL &CO. 70 LINCOLN STREET, BOSTON, MASS. FREEDOM HOUSE 20 WEST 40 STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. International Standard Book Number: 0-932088-01-5 Freedom House, 20 West 40th Street, New York, N.Y. 10018 International Standard Book Number: 0-8161-8387-2 G. K. Hall & Co., 70 Lincoln Street, Boston, Mass. 02111 Copyright © 1979 by Freedom House, Inc. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Gastil, Raymond D Freedom in the world. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Civil rights. I. Bociurkiw, Bohdan R., joint author. II. Title. JC571.G336 1980 323.4 79-87596 Contents PREFACE ix PART I: THE SURVEY IN 1978 The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Nature and Purposes 3 Survey Ratings and Tables for 1978 15 PART II: FREEDOM, EQUALITY, AND CULTURE Freedom and Equality 63 National Cultures and Universal Democracy 75 PART III: SUPPORTING LIBERALIZATION IN THE SOVIET UNION Supporting Liberalization in the Soviet Union 85 The Struggle for National Self-Assertion and Liberalization in the Soviet Union 100 Teresa Rakowska-Harmstone Comments and Discussion 111 Religious Dissent in the Soviet Union: Status, Interrelationships, and Future Potential 115 Bohdan R. Bociurkiw Comments and Discussion 133 Reform and Repression in the USSR: The Western Influence, Herbert J. Ellison 137 Comments and Discussion 152 v vi CONTENTS American Activists and Soviet Power 161 Lewis S.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 1982 Complete Book — Download
    Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1982 A FREEDOM HOUSE BOOK Greenwood Press issues the Freedom House series "Studies in Freedom" in addition to the Freedom House yearbook Freedom in the World. Strategies for the 1980s: Lessons of Cuba, Vietnam, and Afghanistan by Philip van Slyck. Studies in Freedom, Number 1 Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1982 Raymond D. Gastil With Essays by Charles R. Beitz Jeffrey M. Riedinger Grace Goodell Leonard R. Sussman Stephen J. Morris George Weigel John P. Powelson Lindsay M. Wright Roy L. Prosterman GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London, England Copyright © 1982 by Freedom House, Inc. Freedom House, 20 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018 All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. ISBN: 0-313-23178-8 First published in 1982 Greenwood Press A division of Congressional Information Service, Inc. 88 Post Road West Westport, Connecticut 06881 Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 Contents MAP AND TABLES vii PREFACE ix PART I. THE SURVEY IN 1982 Freedom in the Comparative Survey 3 Survey Ratings and Tables for 1982 9 PART II. ANALYZING SPECIFIC CIVIL LIBERTIES A Comparative Survey of Economic Freedoms Lindsay M. Wright 51 Worker Freedoms in Latin America 91 The Continuing Struggle for Freedom of Information Leonard R. Sussman 101 A Preliminary Examination of Religious Freedom George Weigel 121 PART III. DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Democracy in Developing Societies Charles R. Beitz 145 The Democratic Prerequisites of Development Grace Goodell and John P.
    [Show full text]