DOCSLIB.ORG

Registrering Af Fangster Med Standardredskaber I De Danske Kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Josianne G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Registrering Af Fangster Med Standardredskaber I De Danske Kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Josianne G DTU Aqua Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pedersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020 Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Af Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pedersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020 Kolofon Titel: Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder. Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Forfattere: Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pe- dersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr.: 375-2020 År: November 2020 Reference: Støttrup JG, Kokkalis A, Christoffersen M, Pedersen EM, Pedersen MI og Olsen J (2020). Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområ- der. Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019. DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020. Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet. 153 pp. + bilag Forsidefoto: Pighvar klar til udsætning. Foto: Mads Christoffersen. Udgivet af: Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer (DTU Aqua), Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Kemitorvet, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby Download: www.aqua.dtu.dk/publikationer ISSN: 1395-8216 ISBN: Trykt udgave: 978-87-7481-298-2 Elektronisk udgave: 978-87-7481-299-9 DTU Aqua-rapporter er afrapportering fra forskningsprojekter, oversigtsrapporter over faglige emner, redegørelser til myn- digheder o.l. Med mindre det fremgår af kolofonen, er rapporterne ikke fagfællebedømt (peer reviewed), hvilket betyder, at indholdet ikke er gennemgået af forskere uden for projektgruppen. Indhold DANSK RESUMÉ ................................................................................................................................................ 5 ENGLISH SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 7 TAK TIL NØGLEFISKERE M.FL. ....................................................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUKTION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 2 FISKERIET OG INDSAMLEDE DATA ..................................................................................................... 13 2.1 GARNFISKERI ....................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 RUSEFISKERI ....................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 FISKERE OG OMRÅDER ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 OPARBEJDNING AF FANGSTERNE .......................................................................................................... 16 2.5 FANGSTEN ........................................................................................................................................... 17 3 BESKRIVELSE AF HOVEDOMRÅDER ................................................................................................... 23 3.1 ÅBNE VESTKYST .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.2. AALBORG BUGT OG LÆSØ .................................................................................................................... 25 LIMFJORDEN GENERELT .................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3. VESTLIGE LIMFJORD ............................................................................................................................. 27 3.4. SKIVE FJORD OG LOVNS BREDNING ...................................................................................................... 29 3.5. NORDLIGE LIMFJORD ............................................................................................................................ 31 3.6 NISSUM FJORD .................................................................................................................................... 33 3.7 RINGKØBING FJORD ............................................................................................................................. 34 3.8 ØSTVENDTE FJORDE ............................................................................................................................ 36 3.9 AARHUS BUGT ..................................................................................................................................... 38 3.10 VEJLE FJORD ....................................................................................................................................... 40 3.11 LILLEBÆLT ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3.12 FYNS ØHAV ......................................................................................................................................... 44 3.13 ODENSE FJORD ................................................................................................................................... 46 3.14 STOREBÆLT OG KERTEMINDE FJORD .................................................................................................... 48 3.15 SEJERØ BUGT ...................................................................................................................................... 50 3.16 ROSKILDE FJORD OG ISEFJORD ............................................................................................................ 52 3.17 ØRESUND OG FAXE BUGT .................................................................................................................... 54 3.18 SMÅLANDSFARVANDET ......................................................................................................................... 56 3.19 FEMERN BÆLT ..................................................................................................................................... 58 3.20 PRÆSTØ FJORD ................................................................................................................................... 60 3.21 BORNHOLM .......................................................................................................................................... 62 4 DE HYPPIGST FANGEDE ARTER .......................................................................................................... 65 4.1 SKRUBBE (PLATICHTHYS FLESUS) ......................................................................................................... 66 4.1.1 Skrubbe i garn ........................................................................................................................... 66 4.1.2 Skrubbe i ruse ............................................................................................................................ 73 4.2 TORSK (GADUS MORHUA) ..................................................................................................................... 80 4.2.1 Torsk i garn ................................................................................................................................ 80 4.2.2 Torsk i ruse ................................................................................................................................ 84 4.3 RØDSPÆTTE (PLEURONECTES PLATESSA) ............................................................................................. 90 4.3.1 Rødspætte i garn ....................................................................................................................... 90 4.3.2 Rødspætte i ruse ....................................................................................................................... 94 4.4 ÅL (ANGUILLA ANGUILLA) ...................................................................................................................... 98 4.4.1 Ål i ruse ...................................................................................................................................... 98 4.5 ÅLEKVABBE (ZOARCES VIVIPARUS) ..................................................................................................... 105 4.5.1 Ålekvabbe i ruse ...................................................................................................................... 105 4.6 SORTMUNDET KUTLING (NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS) ........................................................................ 111 4.6.1 Sortmundet kutling i ruse ......................................................................................................... 111 5 KRABBER ............................................................................................................................................... 115 5.1 ALMINDELIG STRANDKRABBE .............................................................................................................. 115 5.2 TASKEKRABBE ................................................................................................................................... 116 5.3 KINESISK ULDHÅNDSKRABBE ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Start List 2021 IRONMAN Copenhagen (Last Update: 2021-08-15) Sorted by PRO, AWA, Pole Posistion and Age Group (AG) Search for Your Name with "Ctrl F"
    Start list 2021 IRONMAN Copenhagen (last update: 2021-08-15) Sorted by PRO, AWA, Pole Posistion and Age Group (AG) Search for your name with "Ctrl F" BIB First name Last name AG AWA TriClub Nationallty Please note that BIBs will be given onsite according to the selected swim time you choose in registration oniste. 1 Hogenhaug Kristian MPRO DNK (Denmark) 2 Molinari Giulio MPRO ITA (Italy) 3 Wojt Lukasz MPRO DEU (Germany) 4 Svensson Jesper MPRO SWE (Sweden) 5 Sanders Lionel MPRO CAN (Canada) 6 Smales Elliot MPRO GBR (United Kingdom) 7 Heemeryck Pieter MPRO BEL (Belgium) 8 Mcnamee David MPRO GBR (United Kingdom) 9 Nilsson Patrik MPRO SWE (Sweden) 10 Hindkjær Kristian MPRO DNK (Denmark) 11 Plese David MPRO SVN (Slovenia) 12 Kovacic Jaroslav MPRO SVN (Slovenia) 14 Jarrige Yvan MPRO FRA (France) 15 Schuster Paul MPRO DEU (Germany) 16 Dário Vinhal Thiago MPRO BRA (Brazil) 17 Lyngsø Petersen Mathias MPRO DNK (Denmark) 18 Koutny Philipp MPRO CHE (Switzerland) 19 Amorelli Igor MPRO BRA (Brazil) 20 Petersen-Bach Jens MPRO DNK (Denmark) 21 Olsen Mikkel Hojborg MPRO DNK (Denmark) 22 Korfitsen Oliver MPRO DNK (Denmark) 23 Rahn Fabian MPRO DEU (Germany) 24 Trakic Strahinja MPRO SRB (Serbia) 25 Rother David MPRO DEU (Germany) 26 Herbst Marcus MPRO DEU (Germany) 27 Ohde Luis Henrique MPRO BRA (Brazil) 28 McMahon Brent MPRO CAN (Canada) 29 Sowieja Dominik MPRO DEU (Germany) 30 Clavel Maurice MPRO DEU (Germany) 31 Krauth Joachim MPRO DEU (Germany) 32 Rocheteau Yann MPRO FRA (France) 33 Norberg Sebastian MPRO SWE (Sweden) 34 Neef Sebastian MPRO DEU (Germany) 35 Magnien Dylan MPRO FRA (France) 36 Björkqvist Morgan MPRO SWE (Sweden) 37 Castellà Serra Vicenç MPRO ESP (Spain) 38 Řenč Tomáš MPRO CZE (Czech Republic) 39 Benedikt Stephen MPRO AUT (Austria) 40 Ceccarelli Mattia MPRO ITA (Italy) 41 Günther Fabian MPRO DEU (Germany) 42 Najmowicz Sebastian MPRO POL (Poland) If your club is not listed, please log into your IRONMAN Account (www.ironman.com/login) and connect your IRONMAN Athlete Profile with your club.
    [Show full text]
  • Hele Rapporten I Pdf Format
    Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Vandrammedirektiv–projekt, Fase 1 Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 369 [Tom side] Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Vandrammedirektiv–projekt, Fase 1 Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 369 2001 Kurt Nielsen Afdeling for Sø- og Fjordøkologi Bent Sømod Aarhus Amt Trine Christiansen Afdeling for Havmiljø Datablad Titel: Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark Undertitel: Vandrammedirektiv-projekt, Fase 1 Forfattere: Kurt Nielsen1, Bent Sømod2, Trine Christiansen3 Afdelinger: 1Afd. for Sø- og Fjordøkologi 2Aarhus Amt 3Afd. for Havmiljø Serietitel og nummer: Faglig rapport fra DMU nr. 369 Udgiver: Miljø- og Energiministeriet Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser URL: http://www.dmu.dk Udgivelsestidspunkt: August 2001 Faglig kommentering: Dorte Krause-Jensen, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser; Henning Karup, Miljøstyrelsen; Nanna Rask, Fyns Amt Layout: Pia Nygård Christensen Korrektur: Aase Dyhl Hansen og Pia Nygård Christensen Bedes citeret: Nielsen, K., Sømod, B. & T. Christiansen 2001: Typeinddeling og kvalitetselementer for marine områder i Danmark. Vandrammedirektiv-projekt, Fase 1. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser. 107 s. - Faglig rapport fra DMU nr. 369. http://faglige-rapporter.dmu.dk. Gengivelse tilladt med tydelig kildeangivelse. Sammenfatning: Rapporten indeholder en opdeling af de danske kystområder i 16 forskellige typer i henhold
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Cult of Cnut the Holy the First Royal Saint of Denmark
    Life and cult of Cnut the Holy The first royal saint of Denmark Edited by: Steffen Hope, Mikael Manøe Bjerregaard, Anne Hedeager Krag & Mads Runge Life and cult of Cnut the Holy The first royal saint of Denmark Report from an interdisciplinary research seminar in Odense. November 6th to 7th 2017 Edited by: Steffen Hope, Mikael Manøe Bjerregaard, Anne Hedeager Krag & Mads Runge Kulturhistoriske studier i centralitet – Archaeological and Historical Studies in Centrality, vol. 4, 2019 Forskningscenter Centrum – Odense Bys Museer Syddansk Univeristetsforlag/University Press of Southern Denmark KING CNUT’S DONATION LETTER AND SETTLEMENT STRUCTURE IN DENMARK, 1085 – NEW PERSPECTIVES ON AN OLD DOCUMENT King Cnut’s donation letter and settle- ment structure in Denmark, 1085 – new perspectives on an old document By Jesper Hansen One of the most important sources to the history of donated to the Church of St Laurentius, the cathedral medieval Denmark is the donation letter of Cnut IV, church in Lund, and it represents the first written re- dated 21st of May 1085 and signed in Lund (fig. 1). cord of rural administration and fiscal rights in Den- This letter is a public affirmation of the royal gifts mark (Latin text, appendix 1). Cnut’s donation letter Skälshög, two hides. In Flädie, five this agreed-upon decree against the to the church in Lund and a half hides which Håkon gave to command of holy religion, he is to be the king. In Hilleshög, half a hide. In excommunicated upon the Return of (Dipl. Dan 1.2:21) Håstad, one hide. In Gärd. In Venestad, our Lord and to be consigned to eternal In the name of the indivisible Trinity, one hide.
    [Show full text]
  • Varde Anholt Varde Bornholm Varde Fur Varde Langeland Varde Femų
    Varde Anholt Varde Bornholm Varde Fur Varde Langeland Varde Femø 2. edition edition 22.09.20172. UK Varde Bogø Installation— and User guide Revision 2 Soldalen 12, 7100 Vejle, Danmark, Tel. +45 7482 0003. vardeovne.dk 1 Congratulation on purchasing your new stove Varde Ovne A/S is a Danish company specializing in functional, environmentally friendly and designed quality stoves. Index Welcome and index Page 2 Technical specifications Anholt Page 3 Technical specifications Bornholm Page 4 Technical specifications Fur Page 5 Technical specifications Langeland Page 6 Technical specifications Femø Page 7 Technical specifications Bogø Page 8 Regulations and approval Page 9 Flooring and distance Page 10 Installations distances Page 11 Chimney Page 12 Air supply Page 13 How to light and stoke a fire Page 14 How to light and stoke a fire Page 15 Operation Page 16 Vermiculit e Page 17 How to choose the wood Page 18 Maintenance Page 19 Troubleshooting Page 20 Spare parts Page 21 Testcertificate (RRF) Page 22 Warranty Page 23 2 Technical Specification Anholt Model Anholt Height (mm) 1005 Wide (mm) 458 Depth (mm) 352 Weight (kg) 85 Effect 3-7 kW Nominal Output 5,5 kW Heated area 30-105m² Efficiency 80 % EEI 107 Flue gas data 273°C at 25°C, 12Pa. Combustion Chamber : (H x W x D): 245-360/300/280mm Flue outlet: Ø 15cm (Mounting height top: 99cm) Distance to non inflammable: 5-10cm (Recommended) Distance to inflammable wall and materiels: Rear = 30cm, Sides = 45cm, In front = 110cm 3 Technical Specification Bornholm Model Bornholm Height (mm) 1005 Wide (mm) 458 Depth (mm) 352 Weight (kg) 85 Effect 3-7 kW Nominal Output 5,5 kW Heated area 30-105m² Efficiency 80 % EEI 107 Flue gas data 273°C at 25°C, 12Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Setting and Tectonic Framework in Denmark
    DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2010/124 Low- and intermediate level radioactive waste from Risø, Denmark. Location studies for potential disposal areas. Report no. 3 Geological setting and tectonic framework in Denmark Stig A. Schack Pedersen & Peter Gravesen GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND MINISTRY OF CLIMATE AND ENERGY G E U S DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2010/124 Low- and intermediate level radioactive waste from Risø, Denmark. Location studies for potential disposal areas. Report no. 3 Geological setting and tectonic framework in Denmark Stig A. Schack Pedersen & Peter Gravesen GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND ~ MINISTRY OF CLIMATE AND ENERGY G E U S 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 The aim of this report ............................................................................................... 5 2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING OF DENMARK 6 2.1 The pre-Quaternary Geology of Denmark ............................................................... 7 3. GEOLOGICAL – TECTONIC FRAMEWORK 10 3.1 The geotectonic margins of the Danish Basin ....................................................... 10 3.2 Deep-seated tectonic structures ............................................................................ 12 4. SALT DIAPIRS 13 4.1 The salt provinces in Denmark ............................................................................... 14 5. TECTONICS OF CRETACEOUS AND TERTIARY DEPOSITS 17 6. TECTONICS OF BORNHOLM: BASEMENT, BLOC TECTONICS AND INVERSION 18 7. THE PRE-QUARTERNY SURFACE
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Funen Energy Plan
    STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING AT MUNICIPAL LEVEL Funen Energy Plan Funen is characterised by a high share of agriculture, From a systemic point of view, he emphasizes that the with remarkable biomass resources, and well- energy system needs to be redesigned. He finds it developed district heating and gas distributing important to link large heat pumps to surplus heat systems. To ensure the success and stability of future from industries so that they will be as cost-effective as local investments in the energy sector, Funen has possible. Furthermore, he stresses the importance of developed a political framework for the future energy using heat pumps to harness production of electricity investments, an energy plan. from wind turbines. The plan was developed in a wide cooperation between 9 municipalities on Funen and Ærø, 5 supply companies, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Centrovice (the local agricultural trade organisation), and Udvikling Fyn (a regional business development company). In total, 36 students from SDU have made their Christian Tønnesen, Project manager and Head of the diploma work under the auspices of the energy plan Settlement & Business Department, Faaborg-Midtfyn thus creating a win-win satiation for students, Municipality, underlines: “The ambition for Funen university, local businesses, and municipalities. Energy Plan is to create a platform for the energy Exporting biomass fuel instead of electricity stakeholders, so that they from a common point of view can approach a joint planning for the future The energy plan presents a number of energy with a focus on innovation and optimal recommendations linked to particularly challenging solutions.” energy areas, where robust and long-term navigation Students contributing to real life energy plans is crucial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archipelago Trail Is for Walkers and Is Signposted All the Way
    s / a g r o b d n e v s m a e t k y r t : t n i r p / t u o y a L k d . v a h e o e k s n y f d y s t e d . w w w t a d n u o f e b t h g i r y p o c – n e s l e r y t s l e k i r t a M & - t r o K : s p a m f o s i s a B n a c o g a l e p i h c r A n e n u F f o h t u o S e h T t u o b a n o i t a m r o f n i r e h t r u F r e d i E n e b e r P , n e d e o R n a v s e e C n e e r g d n a e u l b n i d e h t o l c s y a D – , n e s n a H - h t r o j H k i r E s n a H , o t o f o r P - 3 D , n e s l e i N r e l l ø M k i r E : s h p a r g o t o h P t e u a e r u b r u t a N g o n e s l e i N r e l l ø M k i r E , S / I e m s i r u t r u t a N : t x e t / l a i r o t i d E .
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners Indberetning På
    Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægter er ekskl. ordinært § 21 a tilskud, vareafgift til havnene samt moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter i Billetindtægter i perioden marts- perioden marts- september i 2019 (i september i 2020 (i Kommune Rute 1.000 kr.) 1.000 kr.) Assens Baagø-Assens Fanø Fanø-Esbjerg Faaborg-Midtfyn Bjørnø-Faaborg Faaborg-Midtfyn Lyø-Avernakø-Faaborg Haderslev Aarø-Aarøsund Hedensted Hjarnø-Snaptun Holbæk Orø-Holbæk Holbæk Orø- Hammer bakker Horsens Endelave-Snaptun Kalundborg Havnsø-Sejerø Kalundborg Havnsø-Nekselø Langeland Strynø-Rudkøbing Lolland Fejø-Kragenæs Lolland Femø-Kragenæs Lolland Askø-Bandholm Læsø Læsø-Frederikshavn Norddjurs Anholt-Grenaa Odder Tunø-Hou Samsø Hou-Samsø Skive Fur-Branden Slagelse Agersø-Stigsnæs Slagelse Omø-Stigsnæs Struer Venø-Kleppen Svendborg Hjortø-Svendborg 1 3 Svendborg Skarø-drejø-Svendborg 139 111 Ærø Birkholm-Marstal Ærø Ærøskøbing-Svendborg Ærø Søby-Faaborg Ærø Søby-Fynshav Ærø Marstal-Rudkøbing Aabenraa Barsø-Barsø-Landing Aalborg Egholm-Aalborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Beregning af mindreindtægter Samlede mindreindtægte r i 2020 (i 1.000 kr.) 2 -28 Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på passagerområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægt er ekskl. ordinært § 21 b tilskud og moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter
    [Show full text]
  • Miljørapport
    Indholdsfortegnelse Miljørapport for forslag til Råstofplan 2016/2020 5 Ikke teknisk resumé 6 Indledning 8 Råstofplanens formål og sammenhæng med øvrige planer og 10 Miljøvurdering overordnet niveau 12 Biologisk mangfoldighed, flora og fauna 13 Befolkningen 16 Menneskers sundhed 19 Jordbund 20 Vand 21 Luft 23 Klimatiske faktorer 26 Materielle goder 27 Kulturarv (arkitektonisk og arkæologisk arv) 29 Landskab 30 Miljøvurdering af retningslinjer 32 Indvinding 33 Ressourcebeskyttelse og -udnyttelse 34 Hensyn til omkringboende 36 Efterbehandling 37 Forhold til anden administration 38 Miljøvurdering af forslag til nye graveområder 39 B1 Ammendrup udvidelse 41 Afgrænsning og vurdering 43 Bonderup 56 Afgrænsning og vurdering 58 A1 Bøtterup udvidelse 71 Afgrænsning og vurdering 73 Dronningmølle 87 Afgrænsning og vurdering 89 Græse Bakkeby 104 Afgrænsning og vurdering 106 D9 Grønlien 118 2 Afgrænsning og vurdering 120 K1 Holtegård 135 Afgrænsning og vurdering 138 D12 Krogstrup 151 Afgrænsning og vurdering 153 D8 Landerslev Vest 166 Afgrænsning og vurdering 169 L2 Ledøje Vest 182 Afgrænsning og vurdering 185 D4 Lyngerup udv. syd 206 Afgrænsning og vurdering 208 D4 Lyngerup udv. nord 224 Afgrænsning og vurdering 227 D11 Onsved 245 Afgrænsning og vurdering 247 J5 Hedeland udvidelse 264 Afgrænsning og vurdering 266 D7 Ryegård 280 Afgrænsning og vurdering 283 D10 Rørbæk 303 Afgrænsning og vurdering 306 F4 Skævinge 330 Afgrænsning og vurdering 332 E13 Stålhøjgård 347 Afgrænsning og vurdering 349 Søsum 372 Afgrænsning og vurdering 375 L1 Vindekilde 397
    [Show full text]
  • The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm
    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm A Popular Initiative 1 Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm Number of turbines............. 20 x 2 MW Installed Power.................... 40 MW Hub height......................... 64 metres Rotor diameter................... 76 metres Total height........................ 102 metres Foundation depth................ 4 to 8 metres Foundation weight (dry)........ 1,800 tonnes Wind speed at 50-m height... 7.2 m/s Expected production............ 100 GWh/y Production 2002................. 100 GWh (wind 97% of normal) Park efficiency.................... 93% Construction year................ 2000 Investment......................... 48 mill. EUR Kastrup Airport The Middelgrunden Wind Farm is situated a few kilometres away from the centre of Copenhagen. The offshore turbines are connected by cable to the transformer at the Amager power plant 3.5 km away. Kongedybet Hollænderdybet Middelgrunden Saltholm Flak 2 From Idea to Reality The idea of the Middelgrunden wind project was born in a group of visionary people in Copenhagen already in 1993. However it took seven years and a lot of work before the first cooperatively owned offshore wind farm became a reality. Today the 40 MW wind farm with twenty modern 2 MW wind turbines developed by the Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative and Copenhagen Energy Wind is producing electricity for more than 40,000 households in Copenhagen. In 1996 the local association Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office took the initiative of forming a working group for placing turbines on the Middelgrunden shoal and a proposal with 27 turbines was presented to the public. At that time the Danish Energy Authority had mapped the Middelgrunden shoal as a potential site for wind development, but it was not given high priority by the civil servants and the power utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Testing of Tools for Intercalibration of Phytoplankton, Macrovegetation and Benthic Fauna in Danish Coastal Areas
    DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 2014 AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY [Blank page] DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and EnergyNo. 93 2014 Jacob Carstensen Dorte Krause-Jensen Alf Josefson Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Data sheet Series title and no.: Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 Title: Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas Authors: Jacob Carstensen, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Alf Josefson Institution: Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience Publisher: Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy © URL: http://dce.au.dk/en Year of publication: March 2014 Editing completed: February 2014 Referees: Peter Henriksen, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Financial support: Danish Nature Agency (NST) Please cite as: Carstensen, J., Krause-Jensen, D., Josefson, A. 2014. Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 85 pp. Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR93.pdf Reproduction permitted provided the source is explicitly acknowledged Abstract: This report contributes to the development of indicators and assessment tools for ecological status classification according to the European Water Framework Directive as well as the intercalibration of the phytoplankton biomass indicator with Sweden and Germany.
    [Show full text]