DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepidoptera on the Introduced Robinia Pseudoacacia in Slovakia, Central Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lepidoptera on the Introduced Robinia Pseudoacacia in Slovakia, Central Europe Check List 8(4): 709–711, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Lepidoptera on the introduced Robinia pseudoacacia in PECIES S OF ISTS L Slovakia, Central Europe Miroslav Kulfan E-mail: [email protected] Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, Slovakia. Abstract: Robinia pseudoacacia A current checklist of Lepidoptera that utilize as a hostplant in Slovakia (Central Europe) faunalis provided. community. The inventory Two monophagous is based on species, a bibliographic the leaf reviewminers andMacrosaccus new unreported robiniella data and from Parectopa southwest robiniella Slovakia., and Thethe polyphagouslist includes 35pest Lepidoptera Hyphantria species cunea belonging to 10 families. Most species are polyphagous and belong to Euro-Siberian have subsequently been introduced to Slovakia. Introduction E. The area is a polygon enclosed by the towns of Bratislava, Robinia pseudoacacia a widespread species in its native habitat in southeastern North America. It was L.introduced (black locust, to orEurope false acacia),in 1601 is Komárno, Veľký Krtíš and Myjava. Ten plots were located in the southern part of the study area. Most were located in theThe remnant trophic ofgroups the original of the floodplain Lepidoptera forests larvae that found were (Chapman 1935). The first mention of planting the species distributed along the Danube and Morava rivers. (Keresztesiin Slovakia dates 1965). from Today, 1750, itwhen is widespread black locust wasthroughout planted (1986). The zoogeographical distribution of the species western,around the central, fortress eastern in Komárno and southern in southern Europe, Slovakia where followswere defined the arrangement following the give system by Reiprichof Brown (2001). and Hyman The impacts to the native plant communities. it has become a major invasive species with significantRobinia taxonomy and nomenclature of Lepidoptera takes intoet pseudoacacia are not well documented for Europe. al.account the most recent systematic classifications in ThePhytophagous purpose ofinsects this paperassociated is to summarizewith the Europe:Voucher Karsholt specimens and Nieukerken (in ethanol) 2011, arevan Nieukerkendeposited at available information on Lepidoptera that utilize Robinia the 2011, Faculty Laštůvka of Natural and Liška Sciences, 2011. Comenius University, pseudoacacia as a hostplant. Materials and Methods ResultsBratislava, and Slovakia. Discussion The list is partially based on published information of Table 1 presents the list of larval stages of species of Lepidoptera living in the crowns of Robinia pseudoacacia. Besides the 35 Lepidoptera species listed in the Table 1, it the region: Kulfan 1989a; 1991; Sedláček 1991; Reiprich Robinia pseudoacacia is a potential host 1993; Bělín 1999; Kudrna and Belicek 2005; RobiniaKollár pseudoacaciaand Bakay 2010 by the including gracillarids additional - Macrosaccus work concerning robiniella speciesis quite likelyZeuzera that pyrina (Linnaeus, 1761) Cossidae; the andthe significantParectopa robiniellalepidopterous that wasleaf reportedminers ofby Kulfan rottenplant of wood at least species other 8 speciesBatia lambdella in Slovakia: (Donovan, the xylophagous 1793), 1989a, b; 1991; Balázs et al. Crassa unitella Epicallima formosella et al. Dasycera oliviella et al. 2001; Csóka 2003;et al. Gregorová2009a, b; (Fabricius, 1794) (Hübner, all Oecophoridae; 1796), the lichen- feeding 2006; Holec 2009; Kollár and Bakay 2010 and their species(Denis andBisigna Schiffermüller, procerella 1775) and parasitoids (Csóka 2003; Csóka Robinia Oecophoridae; the fructivorous species Etiella zinckenella pseudoacaciaKulfan 1991 andthat Kollárare not and leaf Bakay miners. 2010). These reports (Denis and Schiffermüller, 1775) included findings of several other Lepidoptera on Clepsis pallidana (Fabricius, 1776) family Tortricidae (Reiprich(Treitschke, 2001). 1832) Pyralidae; and leaf-feeding species seasonMore of recent June informationto October, 2004.includes Caterpillars new unreported were hand data collectedfrom southwest by beating Slovakia Robinia gathered pseudoacacia during branches the growing from polyphagous, having extended their host ranges after a height of approximately 0.5 to 2 meters above a ground the TheRobinia vast pseudoacacia majority of wasspecies introduced given in to TableEurope 1 andare sheet. The study areas consisted of 13 study plots, located between the coordinates 47°46’ - 48°45’ N, 16°58’ - 19°14’ Macrosaccus robiniella and Parectopa robiniella and Slovakia. Two monophagous species, the leaf miners 709 Kulfan | Lepidoptera on Robinia pseudoacacia in Slovakia important polyphagous pest Hyphantria cunea have Despite the large number of polyphagous species of LepidopteraKudrna and Belicekand the 2005). long period after the introduction communitysubsequently (Table been 1). introduced to Slovakia (Patočka and of Robinia pseudoacacia KulfanNeptis 2009). sappho, Most species belong to Euro-SiberianLathyrus faunal native lepidopteran species have been adapted to it. By plants, has been adapted on the introduced Robinia comparison with the new in Slovakia,world, the so farcomprehensive only a few pseudoacacia in Central in past Europe known since as feeding the half on of the 20th century (2004) lists only 15 Robinia feeders. recent inventory of Argentine Lepidoptera by Pastrana (Sedláček 1991; Bělín 1999; Jutzeler et al. 2000; Table 1. Lepidoptera found on Robinia pseudoacacia Robinia pseudoacacia). Literature in Slovakia (records with first author to record the species on records: KU89 – Kulfan (1989a); KU91 – Kulfan (1991); SE91 – Sedláček (1991), Bělín (1999), Kudrna and Belicek (2005); RH93 – Reiprich (1993); KO10 – Kollár and Bakay (2010). Unpublished records: KU04 – data obtained in 2004. Trophic groups: S1 – monophagous species, S2 – narrow oligophags, GFAMILY – generalist. FaunalSPECIES elements: ES – Euro-Siberian, OR – Oriental, HO – Holarctic,LITERATURE EU – European, RECORDS ME – Mediterranean,TROPHIC GROUPS NE – Neotropical.FAUNAL ELEMENT Apterona helicoidella (Vallot, 1827) KU91 OR Psyche casta KU91 Psychidae G Sterrhopterix fusca KU91 ES (Pallas, 1767) G ME Macrosaccus robiniella (Clemens, 1859) S1 NE (Haworth, 1809) G Parectopa robiniella Clemens, 1863 KU89 S1 NE Gracillariidae RH93 Chimabachidae Diurnea fagella KU04 EU Orthotaenia undulana KU91 OR ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G Nymphalidae Neptis sappho SE91 S2 ES ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G Sitochroa verticalis (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES (Pallas, 1771) Lasiocampidae Lasiocampa quercus (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES Pyralidae G Agriopis aurantiaria KU91 OR G Agriopis marginaria (Fabricius, 1776) KU04 OR Geometridae (Hübner, 1799) G Alcis repandata (Linnaeus, 1758) KU04 ES G Ascotis selenaria KU04 ES G Biston betularia (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G Biston strataria KU04 G Campaea margaritaria (Linnaeus, 1761) KO10 OR (Hufnagel, 1767) G ME Ectropis crepuscularia KU91 EU G Ematurga atomaria (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G Hypomecis punctinalis (Scopoli, 1763) KU91 ES G Lycia hirtaria KU91 ES G Macaria alternata KU91 ES (Clerck, 1759) G Phigalia pilosaria KU04 ES ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G Notodontidae Pterostoma palpina KU91 ES (Denis and Schiffermüller, 1775) G Erebidae Calliteara pudibunda (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES (Clerck, 1759) G Hyphantria cunea (Drury, 1773) KU91 NE G Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES G Orgyia antiqua (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 G Orgyia recens KU91 ES G HO Noctuidae Acronicta rumicis (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 ES (Hübner, 1819) G Egira conspicillaris (Linnaeus, 1758) KU91 OR G Lacanobia w-latinum KU91 G Orthosia cerasi (Fabricius, 1775) KU91 ES (Hufnagel, 1766) G HO Orthosia gracilis KU91 ES G Orthosia incerta KU91 ([Schiffermüller], 1775) G (Hufnagel, 1766) G HO Acknowledgments: Vizsgálatok a Parectopa robiniella és Phyllonorycter robiniella parazitoid együttesére This work was supported by the Slovak Grant Csóka,vonatkozóan. G., A. Hirka, G. Melika and J. Papp. 2003. Agency for science VEGA (Grants No 1/0124/09 and 1/0137/11). Literature Cited Budapest: MTA. 43 p. Phyllonorycter Az akác új Csóka,robiniella G., A. Hirka, (Clemens, I. Mikó, 1859) D. Matosevic and Parectopa and G. robiniella Melika. 2009a. (Clemens, Parasitoid 1859) kártevöjének (Phyllonorycter robiniella Clemens, 1859) parazitoidjai. assemblagesPeriodicum of two invading Biologorum blacklocust 111(4): leaf 405-411. miners, Balázs,The K.,new C. parasitoidsThuróczy, K.of Mihályi Phyllonorycter and C. Szabóky. robiniella 2001. Clemens, 1859. Phyllonorycter robiniellain Hungary. Parectopa robiniella Clemens, 1863 Motýli České a Slovenské republiky aktivní ve dne. Csóka, G., A. Hirka, I. Mikó, Z. Pénzes Növényvédelemand G. Melika. 2009b. 45(4): A 191-195. Budapest: MTA. 35 p. Clemens, 1859 és a Bělín, V. 1999. Zlín: withparazitoidjai special referenceMagyarországon. to forest trees. Ecological Monographs 5: 37- andNakladatelství phytophagous Kabourek. Coleoptera. 96 p. Journal of Ecology 7: 963-975. Chapman,60. A.G. 1935. The effects of black locust on associated species Brown, V.K. andLeaf P.S. minesHyman.1986. and leaf minersSuccessional. Budapest: communities Agroinform of Kiadó.plants Poškození dřevin a jeho příčiny. 192 p. Csóka, G. 2003. Gregorová, B. (ed) 2006. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR. 362 p. 710 Kulfan | Lepidoptera on Robinia pseudoacacia in Slovakia Neptis sappho
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementmaterial S2.Pdf
    Mitt. Münch. Ent. Ges. 106 Suppl. S2 1-10 München, 15.02.2016 Systematische, revidierte und kommentierte Checkliste der Schmetterlinge Bayerns (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Alfred HASLBERGER & Andreas H. SEGERER Supplementmaterial S2 Zusammenstellung der in vorliegender Arbeit publizierten regionalen Neu- und Wiederfunde. S2.1 Neufunde für die Bayerischen Alpen und/oder das Alpenvorland (AVA) Nr. FauEu Überfamilie Familie Art 0016 431725 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Dyseriocrania subpurpurella (HAWORTH, 1828) 0026 431739 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Eriocrania semipurpurella (STEPHENS, 1835) 0058 431808 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella aceris (FREY, 1857) 0080 431900 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella myrtillella (STAINTON, 1857) 0089 431932 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella splendidissimella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0125 432021 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia decentella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0133 432060 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia hannoverella (GLITZ, 1872) 0158 432282 Adeloidea Heliozelidae Heliozela resplendella (STAINTON, 1851) 0182 432335 Adeloidea Adelidae Adela cuprella (DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER, 1775) 0202 432387 Adeloidea Incurvariidae Incurvaria pectinea HAWORTH, 1828 0230 432437 Tischerioidea Tischeriidae Coptotriche marginea (HAWORTH, 1828) 0331 433122 Tineoidea Tineidae Nemapogon granella (LINNAEUS, 1758) 0355 432916 Tineoidea Tineidae Monopis weaverella (SCOTT, 1858) 0371 433010 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea columbariella WOCKE, 1877 0373 433015 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea trinotella THUNBERG, 1794 0394 433489
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City
    Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
    Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of Albany Hill, Alameda Co., California
    LEPIDOPTERA OF ALBANY HILL, ALAMEDA CO., CALIFORNIA Jerry A. Powell Essig Museum of Entomology University of California, Berkeley and Robert L. Langston Kensington, CA November 1999; edited 2009 The following list summarizes observations of Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) at Albany Hill, Alameda Co., California, during 1995-1999. Data originate from about 75 daytime and crepuscular visits of 0.5 to 3.5 hrs, in all months of the year. All of the butterfly species and some of the moths were recorded by RLL, most of the moth species and their larval host plants by JAP. A total of 145 species is recorded (30 butterflies, 115 moths), a modest number considering the extent and diversity of the flora. However, many of the potential larval host plants may be present in too small patches to support populations of larger moths or butterflies. Nonetheless, we were surprised that colonies of some of the species survive in a small area that has been surrounded by urban development for many decades, including some rare ones in the East Bay region, as annotated below. Moreover, the inventory is incomplete. A more comprehensive census would be accomplished by trapping moths attracted to ultraviolet lights. In a habitat of this size, however, such survey would attract an unknown proportion of species from surrounding areas. Larval collections are indicated by date-based JAP lot numbers (e.g. 95C37 = 1995, March, 37th collection). Larval foods of most of the other species are documented in other populations. Host plants are recorded at Albany Hill for 75 species (65% of the moths, 52% of the total); the rest were observed as adults only.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera) Bývalého Vojenského Prostoru U Oleška (Česká Republika, Ústecký Kraj)
    Published September 15, 2010 Klapalekiana, 46: 69–130, 2010 ISSN 1210-6100 Motýli (Lepidoptera) bývalého vojenského prostoru u Oleška (Česká republika, Ústecký kraj) Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic, Ústí Region) Jan ŠumpICH 582 61 Česká Bělá 212, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Lepidoptera, ecofaunistics, species diversity, sand habitats, Czech Republic, Central Europe Abstract. The lepidopteran fauna of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic: Ústecký Region) was studied in the year 2008. This area is on sandy ground, the predominant habitats are dry Scots pine forests growing on sand. 700 species were recorded, many of them are markedly psammophilous. Some characteristic spe- cies are very abundant there, namely on open habitats Aroga velocella (Zeller, 1839), Teleiopsis diffinis (Haworth, 1828), Platytes alpinellus (Hübner, 1813), Pyrausta ostrinalis (Hübner, 1796), Paradrina selini (Boisduval, 1840), Agrotis vestigialis (Hufnagel, 1766), Eilema pygmaeolum (Doubleday, 1847)���������������������������������������, some other species were only recorded individually (Aristotelia brizella (Treitschke, 1833), Helcystogramma lineolellum (Zeller, 1839), Pediasia fasce- linella (Hübner, 1813), Lythria cruentaria (Hufnagel, 1767) and Hadena irregularis (Hufnagel, 1766)). Elatobia fuliginosella (Lienig et Zeller, 1846), Decantha borkhausenii (Zeller, 1839), Epinotia rubiginosana (Herrich- Schäffer, 1851), Cydia conicolana (Heylaerts, 1874)
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0071096 A1 Yamada Et Al
    US 20100071096A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0071096 A1 Yamada et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 18, 2010 (54) PLANT DISEASE AND INSECT DAMAGE Publication Classification CONTROL COMPOSITION AND PLANT (51) Int. Cl. DISEASE AND INSECT DAMAGE AOIH 5/10 (2006.01) PREVENTION METHOD AOIN 55/10 (2006.01) AOIN 25/26 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: Eiichi Yamada, Chiba (JP): AOIH 5/00 (2006.01) Ryutaro Ezaki, Shiga (JP); AOIH 5/02 (2006.01) Hidenori Daido, Chiba (JP) AOIH 5/08 (2006.01) AOIP3/00 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC (52) U.S. Cl. ............................ 800/295: 514/63; 504/100 POST OFFICE BOX 1404 (57) ABSTRACT ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404 (US) The invention provides a plant disease and insect damage control composition including, as active ingredients, dinote (73) Assignee: Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Minato-ku furan and at least one fungicidal compound; and a plant (JP) disease and insect damage prevention method that includes applying Such a composition to a plant body, Soil, plant seed, (21) Appl. No.: 12/516,966 stored cereal, stored legume, stored fruit, stored vegetable, silage, stored flowering plant, or export/import timber. The (22) PCT Filed: Nov. 22, 2007 invention provides a new plant disease and insect damage (86). PCT No.: PCT/UP2007/072635 control composition and a plant disease and insect damage prevention method with very low toxicity to mammals and S371 (c)(1), fishes, the composition and method showing an effect against (2), (4) Date: May 29, 2009 plural pathogens and pest insects, including emerging resis tant pathogens and resistant pest insect, by application to a (30) Foreign Application Priority Data plant body, soil, plant seed, stored cereal, stored legume, stored fruit, stored vegetable, silage, stored flowering plant, Nov.
    [Show full text]