DOCSLIB.ORG

Shale Gas Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shale Gas Study Foreign and Commonwealth Office Shale Gas Study Final Report April 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Report for Copyright and non-disclosure notice Tatiana Coutinho, Project Officer The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright Setor de Embaixadas Sul owned by Amec Foster Wheeler (© Amec Foster Wheeler Foreign and Commonwealth Office Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2015). save to the Bririah Embassy extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to Quadra 801, Conjunto K another party or is used by Amec Foster Wheeler under Brasilia, DF licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, Brazil it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or Main contributors copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Amec Foster Wheeler. Disclosure of that information may Pete Davis constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may Alex Melling otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party Daren Luscombe who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any Katherine Mason event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Rob Deanwood Silvio Jablonski, ANP Third-party disclaimer Issued by Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to ................................................................................. any third party who is able to access it by any means. Amec Alex Melling Foster Wheeler excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or Approved by death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability. ................................................................................. Pete Davis Management systems This document has been produced by Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited in full compliance with Amec Foster Wheeler the management systems, which have been certified to ISO Gables House 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 by LRQA. Kenilworth Road Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 6JX United Kingdom Document revisions Tel +44 (0) 1926 439 000 No. Details Date Doc Ref. 35779rr 1 Draft Report 21.11.2014 h:\projects\35779 shale gas study\1 client\reports\report\final\shale gas study _final.docx 2 Revised Report 16.03.2015 3 Final 29.04.2015 April 2015 Doc Ref. 35779rr 3 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Executive summary Purpose The exploration and production of shale gas represents a significant opportunity for many countries. It could help address energy security, energy costs and the need for transitional energy sources in moving towards a low carbon future. Brazil, as one of 10 countries that have collectively been estimated to contain nearly 80% of the world’s estimated technically recoverable shale gas resources1, is actively considering the potential for shale gas. However, in common with many other nations2 considering the potential for unconventional oil and gas, the proposed development of shale gas in Brazil has also raised concerns regarding the potential effects on the environment3. At present, Brazil does not have specific procedures or recommendations from the environmental agencies concerning shale gas or oil exploration and development although there is a resolution from ANP, the oil and gas licensing agency, for the management of risks to human health and the environment. Following an initiative of the Ministries of Mines and Energy and the Environment, a project has been established to analyse the key issues concerning the development and production of unconventional oil and gas resources under a federal Program known as PROMINP (Mobilization Program of Industry in the Oil and Natural Gas). As a contribution to research under PROMINP and in order to support the Brazilian government develop a strong regulation for the safe exploration of shale gas by drawing on international research, Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure UK Ltd has completed a review of the risks to the environment and human health of shale gas exploration and production and the approaches to managing these risks through regulatory frameworks in the UK and Europe. Environmental Risks The key risks identified through this work are summarised in the following table. It indicates that the majority of risks and impacts associated with unconventional oil and gas exploration and development are common to those associated with conventional oil and gas development. Differences however do occur when considering the technologies and requirements of the hydraulic fracturing process itself. These are likely to include: induced seismic events; the local sourcing of water, creating additional demand during periods of water stress; the management of chemicals and the mixing, storage and use of the fracture fluid, the management of flowback water and fugitive greenhouse gas emissions. Theme Risk/Impact Conventional Un- conventional Biodiversity Direct loss and/or fragmentation of habitat from construction and operation of well site and well pad activities. Indirect impacts on habitats/species due to, for example, disturbance from noise, human presence and light pollution and the introduction of invasive species and the exposure to pollution through causal pathways. Land Use and Land requirements for pad and pipelines, disruption to soil layers and Geology compaction and resulting impacts on removal of land for alternative uses (natural or anthropogenic) and ecology/ environment impacts. 1 US Energy Information Administration, Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States, 2013 2 BIO Intelligence Service (2013), Presentation of the results of the public consultation “Unconventional fossil fuels (e.g. shale gas) in Europe” Brussels – 7th June 2013, for the European Commission and DG Environment, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/energy/pdf/Presentation_07062013.pdf 3 Brazilian Academy of Sciences Letter to President Rouseff, 5th August 2013, http://jonathandealblog.com/2013/08/29/fracking-not- welcomed-with-open-arms-in-brazil/ April 2015 Doc Ref. 35779rr 4 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Theme Risk/Impact Conventional Un- conventional Induced seismicity from hydraulic fracturing activities and the potential (in limited impact on well integrity, creation of geological pathways for pollutants and circumstance4) possible minor earth tremors. Water Resources Surface spillage of pollutants such as diesel and drilling fluids and silt-laden run-off resulting in surface water pollution. Surface spillage of hydraulic fracturing fluids and wastewaters resulting in surface water pollution. Well failure resulting in pollutants released from the well to groundwaters. Introduction of pollutants due to induced fractures providing pathways to groundwater resources through either pre-existing man-made or natural structures. Inappropriate selection of chemicals in hydraulic fracturing and/ or unsuitable assessment leading to unacceptable risks to the environment from releases. Water consumption associated with hydraulic fracturing activities affecting the availability of water resources, aquatic habitats and ecosystems and water quality. Well pad development at risk of flooding and/or resulting in increased flood risk off site due to increase in impermeable area and/or location of facilities in areas of flood risk. Air Quality Emissions to air from well pad construction and drilling resulting in adverse local air quality impacts. Emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activities resulting in adverse local air quality impacts. Climate Change Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from well pad construction and drilling. GHG emissions associated with hydraulic fracturing activities. GHG emissions arising from well completion. Fugitive GHG emissions. Combustion of extracted hydrocarbons generating GHG emissions. Waste Arisings Generation of construction and drilling wastes. Generation of flowback water following hydraulic fracturing activities. Cultural Heritage Direct loss of or damage to cultural heritage features and landscapes from construction of well pad and associated infrastructure. Indirect effects on the setting of cultural heritage assets as a result of the well pad construction and operation. Landscape Impacts and landscape character and visual amenity due to well pad construction and operation activities. Human Health Emissions to air, dust and noise associated with construction and drilling activities resulting in adverse impacts on nearby receptors. 4 Davies et al (2012) Induced Seismicity and Hydraulic Fracturing for the Recovery of Hydrocarbons, Marine and Petroleum Geology Manuscript, https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/refine/InducedSeismicityfull.pdf April 2015 Doc Ref. 35779rr 5 © Amec
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Materials & Process
    Sculpture: Materials & Process Teaching Resource Developed by Molly Kysar 2001 Flora Street Dallas, TX 75201 Tel 214.242.5100 Fax 214.242.5155 NasherSculptureCenter.org INDEX INTRODUCTION 3 WORKS OF ART 4 BRONZE Material & Process 5-8 Auguste Rodin, Eve, 1881 9-10 George Segal, Rush Hour, 1983 11-13 PLASTER Material & Process 14-16 Henri Matisse, Madeleine I, 1901 17-18 Pablo Picasso, Head of a Woman (Fernande), 1909 19-20 STEEL Material & Process 21-22 Antony Gormley, Quantum Cloud XX (tornado), 2000 23-24 Mark di Suvero, Eviva Amore, 2001 24-25 GLOSSARY 26 RESOURCES 27 ALL IMAGES OF WORKS OF ART ARE PROTECTED UNDER COPYRIGHT. ANY USES OTHER THAN FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ARE STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. 2 Introduction This resource is designed to introduce students in 4th-12th grades to the materials and processes used in modern and traditional sculpture, specifically bronze, plaster, and steel. The featured sculptures, drawn from the collection of the Nasher Sculpture Center, range from 1881 to 2001 and represent only some of the many materials and processes used by artists whose works of art are in the collection. Images from this packet are also available in a PowerPoint presentation for use in the classroom, available at nashersculpturecenter.org. DISCUSS WITH YOUR STUDENTS Artists can use almost any material to create a work of art. When an artist is deciding which material to use, he or she may consider how that particular material will help express his or her ideas. Where have students seen bronze before? Olympic medals, statues… Plaster? Casts for broken bones, texture or decoration on walls..
    [Show full text]
  • Section 092400
    SPEC MIX, Inc. – Guide Specification Note to User: This section contains macros to aid the editing process. By default Microsoft Word disables macros for virus security reasons. When you open a file that has macros, the yellow message bar appears with a shield icon and the enable content button. To enable these macros, click the Enable Content button. SECTION 09 24 00 PORTLAND CEMENT STUCCO (To View Hidden Text, Type CTRL-H) PART 1 – GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Portland Cement, Pre-blended Scratch and Brown Coat Stucco. B. Portland Cement, Pre-blended Fiber Base Coat Stucco. C. Portland Cement, Pre-blended Colored Finish Coat Stucco. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 03 30 00 - Cast-in-Place Concrete. B. Section 04 20 00 - Unit Masonry. C. Section 05 40 00 - Cold-Formed Metal Framing: Light gauge load-bearing metal framing. D. Section 06 10 00 - Rough Carpentry: Wood framing. E. Section 07 21 13 - Board Insulation. F. Section 07 92 00 - Joint Sealants. G. Section 09 22 16 - Non-Structural Metal Framing: Non-load-bearing metal framing systems. H. Section 09 22 36 - Metal Lath. I. Section 09 29 00 - Gypsum Board: Exterior gypsum sheathing. 1.3 REFERENCES A. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) / American Hardboard Association (AHA): 1. ANSI/AHA A 194 - Cellulosic Fiber Board. B. ASTM International (ASTM): 1. ASTM A 641/A 641M - Standard Specification for Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Carbon Steel Wire. 2. ASTM A 653/A 653M - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc- Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crude Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Region: Input Data and Analysis Methods
    Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crude Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Region: Input Data and Analysis Methods Abbas Ghandi1, Sonia Yeh1, Adam R. Brandt2, Kourosh Vafi2, Hao Cai3, Michael Q. Wang3, Bridget R. Scanlon4, Robert C. Reedy4 1Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis 2Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University 3Systems Assessment Group, Argonne National Laboratory 4Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, Univ. of Texas at Austin Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis September 2015 Prepared for Systems Assessment Group Energy Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Data summary ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Monthly production and completion ................................................................................. 6 2.3 API gravity ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1991 Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces Maria Isabel G. Beas University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Beas, Maria Isabel G., "Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces" (1991). Theses (Historic Preservation). 395. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/395 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Beas, Maria Isabel G. (1991). Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/395 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Beas, Maria Isabel G. (1991). Traditional Architectural Renders on Earthen Surfaces. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/395 'T,' i'&Sim mi> 'm m. i =ir,!t-i^-!vs i )'» \ •.'.i:'-ii-2\c-. fell ;;!•!' UNIVERSITVy PENNSYLVANIA. UBKARIES TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL RENDERS ON EARTHEN SURFACES Maria Isabel G. Beas A THESIS in The Graduate Program in Historic Presen/ation Presented to the faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 1991 Frank G.lMatero, Associate Professor 'reservation, Advisor X Samuel Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
    CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene
    [Show full text]
  • J.Kenneth Klitz
    J. Kenneth Klitz i: ;,-_ .. ...... l~ t :. i \ NORTH SEA OIL RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE U.K. SECTOR From the first exploration wells in 1964 to virtual self­ sufficiency by 1980, the development of the U. K. North Sea oil fields has been rapid and productive. However, the hostile environment and the sheer scale of the operation have made heavy demands on both natural and human resources. Just how large has this investment of resources been? Has it been justified by the amount of energy recovered? What lessons does the development of the North Sea hold for operators of other offshore fields? Using an approach developed at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, J. Kenneth Klitz attempts to answer these questions. He presents a wealth of detailed information obtained from exhaus­ tive Iiterature searches and close cooperation with the North Sea oil companies themselves, and uses it to in­ vestigate the resources needed to construct and operate the various field installations and facilities. From this starting point he then derives the total amounts of re­ sources required to develop first each field and then the entire U.K. sector. To put this resource expenditure in perspective, the author describes the way in which estimates of North Sea oil reserves have evolved and examines the addi­ tional yields that may be obtained by using technolog­ ically advanced oil-recovery methods; also included is an interesting comparison of the "energy economics" of producing either gas or oil from the North Sea. Finally, there are extensive descriptions of the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsum Resources of Iowa by Robert M
    Gypsum Resources of Iowa by Robert M. McKay In mining gypsum at Fort Dodge, overlying glacial deposits are removed and the deeply creviced surface of the gypsum is exposed. These crevices resulted from movement of water along intersecting fractures in the easily eroded gypsum. Photo by Tim Kemmis. One of the softest minerals known to exist is the basis for one of Iowa's most durable mineral resource industries. Gypsum is a gray to white-colored mineral that can be easily scratched with a fingernail, and is referred to chemically as a hydrous calcium sulfate. Some of its other, perhaps more familiar, names are based on its various forms of occurrence. For example, alabaster is a massive form; satin spar is a fibrous variety; and selenite is its crystalline form. Gypsum often occurs in varying proportions with anhydrite (calcium sulfate), a slightly harder and more dense mineral that lacks water in its chemical make-up. Both gypsum and anhydrite belong to an interesting group of minerals called evaporites, which are sedimentary deposits composed of salts precipitated from sea water. Evaporites form in shallow or near shore marine and lake environments where evaporation has - 1 - produced an unusually high concentration of dissolved salts, and where there is little or no circulation of fresh water. The precipitation of sediment from these hypersaline brines is associated with hot and relatively dry climatic conditions. Iowa's paleogeography at several times in the state's geologic past duplicated these environments of deposition and resulted in major accumulations of evaporite minerals. As a result, several geologic units in Iowa's underlying sedimentary rock sequence host economically significant deposits of gypsum.
    [Show full text]
  • Shale Innovation: Brawn to Brains to Bytes the History of the US Shale Boom Is a Story of Innovation Unleashed
    EQUITY RESEARCH | June 23, 2017 Shale Innovation: Brawn to Brains to Bytes The history of the US shale boom is a story of innovation unleashed. Since the first use of hydraulic fracturing to extract oil and gas from shale, drillers have surprised markets with their ability to scale production and bring down costs. We argue this trend is not yet over and the next stages of shale innovation will lower breakeven prices from $50/bbl WTI to below $45/bbl. We see more intense applications of today’s shale technology (“brawn”) being complemented by sophisticated analytics, data and intelligence (“brains and bytes”) to favor scale winners and enablers, while driving consolidation among E&Ps. Brian Singer, CFA Waqar Syed Viswa Sandeep Sama, CFA Umang Choudhary (212) 902-8259 (212) 357-1804 (917) 343-4601 (212) 357-2642 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed by non-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Data Monitoring Systems Available for Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
    An Assessment of the Various Types of Real- Time Data Monitoring Systems Available for Offshore Oil and Gas Operations A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Date: February 10, 2014 E12PC00063 © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 1 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – (Task 1) Assessment of the various types of real-time data monitoring systems available for offshore oil and gas operations ........................... 5 Chapter Summary ........................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 9 Concepts of Operations ................................................................................................ 10 Available RTD Technology ............................................................................................ 22 Operators Using Real-time Data ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycle of Vanadium
    Global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium William H. Schlesingera,1, Emily M. Kleina, and Avner Vengosha aEarth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 Contributed by William H. Schlesinger, November 9, 2017 (sent for review September 1, 2017; reviewed by Robert A. Duce, Andrew J. Friedland, and James N. Galloway) Synthesizing published data, we provide a quantitative summary problematic environmental contaminant, but high concentrations of the global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium (V), including both of V can be toxic to humans and other organisms (18, 19). human-derived and natural fluxes. Through mining of V ores Reflecting a new level of concern, the State of California has re- (130 × 109 g V/y) and extraction and combustion of fossil fuels cently imposed a new standard (15 μg/L) for V in drinking water (600 × 109 g V/y), humans are the predominant force in the geo- (https://oehha.ca.gov/water/notification-level/proposed-notifica- chemical cycle of V at Earth’s surface. Human emissions of V to the tion-level-vanadium). In some regions, the release of V to the atmosphere are now likely to exceed background emissions by as atmosphere and its deposition in natural ecosystems have de- much as a factor of 1.7, and, presumably, we have altered the clined in recent decades due to changes in fuel use and industrial deposition of V from the atmosphere by a similar amount. Exces- practices (20, 21). sive V in air and water has potential, but poorly documented, Vanadium’s primary commercial use is in the manufacture consequences for human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials Conservation – Concrete and Plaster
    Materials Conservation – Concrete and Plaster Carolyn L. Searls Senior Principal, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Matthew Bronski Associate Principal, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger California Preservation Foundation Webinar 16 September 2014 www.sgh.com www.sgh.com 1 Learning Objectives • Understand the composition and properties of cementitious materials. • Recognize signs of concrete and plaster deterioration and their causes. • Learn reactive and proactive repair techniques for concrete and plaster. • Learn procedures for repairing uncoated, integrally colored plaster and concrete. 2 The Materials: Plaster, Concrete and Cast Stone • All are made up of binder + aggregates + water • Concrete = Cement (the binder), fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, admixtures and water • Cast Stone = Cement, fine aggregate, crushed rock, admixtures and water, precast in units • Plaster = Mortar applied to a substrate (masonry, concrete, or lath over sheathing or building paper) as a wall finish. Usually cement and/or lime (binder), fine aggregate, admixtures and water 3 Evaluation and Repair of Concrete and Plaster • Diagnose the problem – field investigation, lab testing, analysis and report. The treatment must be appropriate for the illness. • Design the repair – the right team • Select the correct materials • Construct field mock-ups • Select the right contractor • Provide quality control during repairs 4 Concrete • Roman concrete structures – lime putty + pozzolan (volcanic tuff rock at Pozzuoli) + aggregates = hydraulic concrete • Natural cement concrete – Erie
    [Show full text]
  • DECC Consultation on Underground Drilling Access
    Underground Drilling Access Government Response to the Consultation on Proposal for Underground Access for the Extraction of Gas, Oil or Geothermal Energy 25 September 2014 © Crown copyright 2014 URN 14D/365 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] 2 General Information Purpose of this document: This document sets out the Government’s response to the consultation on a proposal for underground access for the extraction of gas, oil or geothermal energy, published on 23 May 2014. Issued: 25 September 2014 Enquiries to: The Office of Unconventional Gas and Oil and The Heat and Strategy Policy Team Department of Energy & Climate Change, 3 Whitehall Place, London, SW1A 2AW Email: [email protected] Territorial extent: The proposals discussed in this Government response apply to England, Wales and Scotland in respect to petroleum. The proposals on deep geothermal energy also cover England, Wales and Scotland (where in Scotland, deep geothermal energy is exploited for the sole, or main purpose of electricity generation). The use of deep geothermal energy for heat only purposes is devolved to the Scottish Government. In Northern Ireland, responsibility for petroleum and geothermal energy lies with the Northern Ireland Executive’s Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment.
    [Show full text]