DOCSLIB.ORG

Time Data Monitoring Systems Available for Offshore Oil and Gas Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Time Data Monitoring Systems Available for Offshore Oil and Gas Operations An Assessment of the Various Types of Real- Time Data Monitoring Systems Available for Offshore Oil and Gas Operations A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Date: February 10, 2014 E12PC00063 © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 1 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – (Task 1) Assessment of the various types of real-time data monitoring systems available for offshore oil and gas operations ........................... 5 Chapter Summary ........................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 9 Concepts of Operations ................................................................................................ 10 Available RTD Technology ............................................................................................ 22 Operators Using Real-time Data ................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 2 – (Task 3) Discuss options for training programs or contracted services which would be needed to incorporate the identified systems into BSEE’s process. ..... 39 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................................... 40 System Safety at the Regulator Level ........................................................................... 41 Major Functions of Safety Oversight ............................................................................. 43 Safety Oversight System Design ................................................................................... 46 Training Program Development .................................................................................... 48 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 3 – (Task 6): Identify how real-time monitoring could be incorporated into the BSEE regulatory regime in either a prescriptive or performance based manner.................................. 70 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................................... 71 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 73 Prescriptive/Performance-Based Regulation for the Oil and Gas Industry. .................... 75 Regulatory Involvement ................................................................................................ 77 BSEE Mandates and Regulations ................................................................................. 92 RTM Implementation ..................................................................................................... 95 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 102 CHAPTER 4 – (Task 4) Identify all necessary information which needs to be collected, calculated, or monitored during operations to improve the current level of safety. Identify any existing or proposed modeling tools that can be used in connection with real-time data to prevent incidents .............................................. 104 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................................... 105 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 107 Information to Improve Levels of Safety ...................................................................... 109 Modeling Tools to Prevent Incidents ........................................................................... 125 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 130 © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 2 CHAPTER 5 - (Task 5) Technologies and Data Helpful in Measuring Field Performance of Critical Equipment to Predict Potential Failures and Replace Current Methods ....................................................................................................... 132 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................................... 133 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 134 Technology and Data for Measuring Performance and Predicting Failure ................... 135 Areas Where Technology Can Replace Current Inspection Techniques ..................... 152 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 157 CHAPTER 6 - (Task 7) Assessment of Automation Technologies Impacts on Human and Environmental Safety, Efficiency Improvements, and Cost .............. 158 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................................... 159 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 160 Definition of Automation .............................................................................................. 162 Assessment of Current Automation Technologies in the Oil and Gas Industry ............ 172 Impacts on Human Safety ........................................................................................... 178 Impacts on Environmental Safety ................................................................................ 181 Improvements in Efficiency & Cost .............................................................................. 182 CHAPTER 7 – (Task 2) Perform Cost Benefit Analysis of the systems identified that details potential costs to industry, potential increases in safety performance, government resources needed for implementation, and necessary training for all parties involved. ........................................................................................................ 184 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................................... 185 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 187 Scope of Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) ......................................................................... 190 Real Time Operations Center (RTOC)/ Real Time Monitoring Center (RTMC) ............ 194 Drilling Automation ...................................................................................................... 204 RTMC Cost to the Industry and Returns...................................................................... 212 Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 215 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 217 About the Authors .................................................................................................... 218 References ................................................................................................................ 219 © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 3 Intentionally Left Blank © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 4 CHAPTER 1 – (Task 1) Assessment of the various types of real-time data monitoring systems available for offshore oil and gas operations © 838 Inc 2014 The view, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Government position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other documentation 5 Chapter Summary The Bureau of Safety and Environmental continuous data feeds from the company’s Enforcement (BSEE) commissioned this active well projects. Monitoring stations study to provide a broad industry overview within the RTMC are staffed with highly of the use of real-time data (RTD). Of experienced drilling experts who focus on special interest is the use of real-time mitigating drilling hazards and preventing monitoring systems and their impact on the non-productive time (NPT) while providing overall safety of operations. The study is an added team member and safety broken down into seven tasks, each with observer to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle East Oil Pricing Systems in Flux Introduction
    May 2021: ISSUE 128 MIDDLE EAST OIL PRICING SYSTEMS IN FLUX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 THE GULF/ASIA BENCHMARKS: SETTING THE SCENE...................................................................................................... 5 Adi Imsirovic THE SHIFT IN CRUDE AND PRODUCT FLOWS ..................................................................................................................... 8 Reid l'Anson and Kevin Wright THE DUBAI BENCHMARK: EVOLUTION AND RESILIENCE ............................................................................................... 12 Dave Ernsberger MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA OIL PRICING—BENCHMARKS AND TRADING OPPORTUNITIES......................................... 15 Paul Young THE PROSPECTS OF MURBAN AS A BENCHMARK .......................................................................................................... 18 Michael Wittner IFAD: A LURCHING START IN A SANDY ROAD .................................................................................................................. 22 Jorge Montepeque THE SECOND SPLIT: BASRAH MEDIUM AND THE CHALLENGE OF IRAQI CRUDE QUALITY...................................... 29 Ahmed Mehdi CHINA’S SHANGHAI INE CRUDE FUTURES: HAPPY ACCIDENT VERSUS OVERDESIGN ............................................. 33 Tom Reed FUJAIRAH’S RISE TO PROMINENCE ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction Rebecca K
    Journal of International Business and Law Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 10 2011 Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction Rebecca K. Richards Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl Recommended Citation Richards, Rebecca K. (2011) "Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction," Journal of International Business and Law: Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol10/iss2/10 This Notes & Student Works is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of International Business and Law by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Richards: Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the DEEPWATER MOBILE OIL RIGS IN THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AND THE UNCERTAINTY OF COASTAL STATE JURISDICTION Rebecca K. Richards* I. INTRODUCTION The involvement of a deepwater mobile oil rig in the April 2010 BP oil spill disaster in the United States exclusive economic zone ("EEZ") in the Gulf of Mexico forcefully demonstrated the potential that deepwater mobile oil rigs have to cause catastrophic harm to the coastal state in ways not presented by fixed oil rigs operating in shallow water.' Though coastal states have this great risk of catastrophic harm, their plenary jurisdiction over deepwa- ter mobile oil rigs is currently uncertain. 2 The vagueness of coastal state jurisdictional author- ity over these rigs3 unacceptably increases the risk of accidents,4 as seen with the BP Deepwater Horizon spill.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation
    January 2011 RFF DP 10-62 Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation Alan Krupnick, Sarah Campbell, Mark A. Cohen, and Ian W.H. Parry 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org DISCUSSION PAPER Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation Alan Krupnick, Sarah Campbell, Mark A. Cohen, and Ian W.H. Parry Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework for understanding how analysis of costs and benefits might be incorporated into an assessment of regulatory policies affecting deepwater drilling. We begin by providing a framework for analyzing the life-cycle impacts of oil drilling and its alternatives, including onshore drilling and importing oil from abroad. We then provide background estimates of the different sources of oil supplied in the United States, look at how other oil supply sources might respond to regulations on deepwater drilling, and consider the economic costs of these regulations. After providing a comprehensive description of the potential costs and benefits from various types of drilling—including, when possible, estimates of the magnitude of these benefits and costs—we discuss the extent to which these costs and benefits may already be taken into account (or reinforced) through the legal, regulatory, and tax systems and through market mechanisms. We conclude by presenting a framework and simple example of how a cost–benefit analysis might be used to inform regulation of deepwater drilling, and sum up the policy implications of our work. Key Words: catastrophic oil spill, cost–benefit analysis, government regulation, liability © 2011 Resources for the Future.
    [Show full text]
  • Torque and Drag Applications for Deviated and Horizontal Wells: a Case Study
    TORQUE AND DRAG APPLICATIONS FOR DEVIATED AND HORIZONTAL WELLS: A CASE STUDY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BURAK KAĞAN ÇAĞLAYAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS ENGINEERING DECEMBER 2014 Approval of the thesis: TORQUE AND DRAG APPLICATIONS FOR DEVIATED AND HORIZONTAL WELLS: A CASE STUDY submitted by BURAK KAĞAN ÇAĞLAYAN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver ___________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Mahmut Parlaktuna ___________ Head of Department, Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Prof. Dr. Mustafa Verşan Kök ___________ Supervisor, Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Tuna Eren ___________ Co-Supervisor, Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., BATÜ Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Mahmut Parlaktuna _________________ Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Mustafa Verşan Kök _________________ Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Tuna Eren _________________ Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., BATÜ Assist. Prof. Dr. Çağlar Sınayuç _________________ Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept., METU Dr. Reha Özel _________________ TPAO, Research Center Date: 01/12/2014 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Godišnje Izvješc´ E Annual Report Godišnj Zvješc´ E
    GodišnjeGodišnj izvješczvješc´e Rudarsko-geološko-naftnogudarsko-geološ nog fakulteta SveučilištSveučilišta u Zagrebuebu Za akademskuakadem godinu 2013./2014.2013./ Annual Report Faculty of Mining,ng, GeologGeologyy andand Petroleun Engineering UUniversityniversity of ZZagreb ForFor thethe academicacadem year 2013/20142013/20 Zagreb,Zagreb, 2012014. Nakladnik Rudarsko-geološko-na ni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Za nakladnika Zoran Nakić Zoran Nakić Sibila Borojević Šoštarić Katarina Simon Mario Dobrilović Bojan Moslavac Urednici Daria Karasalihović Sedlar Ema Jurkin Iva Kolenković Jelena Parlov Vinko Škrlec Tehnički urednik Chris an T. Belinc Jezični savje i lektura hrvatskog jezika Alisa Kichl Dubravka Pleše Jezični savje i lektura engleskog jezika Željka Kurelec Oblikovanje omota Chris an T. Belinc Tisak DENONA d.o.o., Zagreb Naklada 500 ZAGREB, 2014. ISBN 978-953-6923-00-0 Uvodna rijecˇ dekana Foreword by the dean Poštovani čitatelji, Dear Readers, protekla akademska godina 2013./2014. bila je po mnogim po- the past academic year 2013/2014 was an extremely dynamic kazateljima izrazito dinamična i turbulentna godina na Rudarsko- and turbulent one at the Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petro- geološko-na nom fakultetu Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (RGNF-u). leum Engineering, University of Zagreb (RGNF). Bila je to godina u kojoj smo na RGNF-u pokrenuli mnoge nove It was a year in which we have launched many new ac vi es, ak vnos , usmjerene, prije svega, poboljšanju i unaprjeđenju aimed, above all, to enhance and improve the Faculty’s core ac- svojih temeljnih djelatnos , ali i godina u kojoj smo na RGNF- vity, but also a year in which we have faced numerous challeng- u bili suočeni i s brojnim izazovima u fi nanciranju, prije svega es in the budge ng and funding of the scien fi c research work, znanstveno-istraživačkoga rada, kao i u zapošljavanju djelatnika as well as in the recruitment of staff for the scien fi c-educa on- na znanstveno-nastavna, nastavna, stručna i administra vna al, technical and administra ve jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillar Machine Fluids Recommendations
    SEBU6250-15 January 2008 Caterpillar Machine Fluids Recommendations i01658146 Important Safety Information Most accidents that involve product operation, maintenance and repair are caused by failure to observe basic safety rules or precautions. An accident can often be avoided by recognizing potentially hazardous situations before an accident occurs. A person must be alert to potential hazards. This person should also have the necessary training, skills and tools to perform these functions properly. Improper operation, lubrication, maintenance or repair of this product can be dangerous and could result in injury or death. Do not operate or perform any lubrication, maintenance or repair on this product, until you have read and understood the operation, lubrication, maintenance and repair information. Safety precautions and warnings are provided in this manual and on the product. If these hazard warnings are not heeded, bodily injury or death could occur to you or to other persons. The hazards are identified by the “Safety Alert Symbol” and followed by a “Signal Word” such as “DANGER”, “WARNING” or “CAUTION”. The Safety Alert “WARNING” label is shown below. The meaning of this safety alert symbol is as follows: Attention! Become Alert! Your Safety is Involved. The message that appears under the warning explains the hazard and can be either written or pictorially presented. Operations that may cause product damage are identified by “NOTICE” labels on the product and in this publication. Caterpillar cannot anticipate every possible circumstance that might involve a potential hazard. The warnings in this publication and on the product are, therefore, not all inclusive. If a tool, procedure, work method or operating technique that is not specifically recommended by Caterpillar is used, you must satisfy yourself that it is safe for you and for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycle of Vanadium
    Global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium William H. Schlesingera,1, Emily M. Kleina, and Avner Vengosha aEarth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 Contributed by William H. Schlesinger, November 9, 2017 (sent for review September 1, 2017; reviewed by Robert A. Duce, Andrew J. Friedland, and James N. Galloway) Synthesizing published data, we provide a quantitative summary problematic environmental contaminant, but high concentrations of the global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium (V), including both of V can be toxic to humans and other organisms (18, 19). human-derived and natural fluxes. Through mining of V ores Reflecting a new level of concern, the State of California has re- (130 × 109 g V/y) and extraction and combustion of fossil fuels cently imposed a new standard (15 μg/L) for V in drinking water (600 × 109 g V/y), humans are the predominant force in the geo- (https://oehha.ca.gov/water/notification-level/proposed-notifica- chemical cycle of V at Earth’s surface. Human emissions of V to the tion-level-vanadium). In some regions, the release of V to the atmosphere are now likely to exceed background emissions by as atmosphere and its deposition in natural ecosystems have de- much as a factor of 1.7, and, presumably, we have altered the clined in recent decades due to changes in fuel use and industrial deposition of V from the atmosphere by a similar amount. Exces- practices (20, 21). sive V in air and water has potential, but poorly documented, Vanadium’s primary commercial use is in the manufacture consequences for human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Involved in Oilfield Services from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Companies Involved in Oilfield Services From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Diversified Oilfield Services Companies These companies deal in a wide range of oilfield services, allowing them access to markets ranging from seismic imaging to deep water oil exploration. Schlumberger Halliburton Baker Weatherford International Oilfield Equipment Companies These companies build rigs and supply hardware for rig upgrades and oilfield operations. Yantai Jereh Petroleum Equipment&Technologies Co., Ltd. National-Oilwell Varco FMC Technologies Cameron Corporation Weir SPM Oil & Gas Zhongman Petroleum & Natural Gas Corpration LappinTech LLC Dresser-Rand Group Inc. Oilfield Services Disposal Companies These companies provide saltwater disposal and transportation services for Oil & Gas.. Frontier Oilfield Services Inc. (FOSI) Oil Exploration and Production Services Contractors These companies deal in seismic imaging technology for oil and gas exploration. ION Geophysical Corporation CGG Veritas Brigham Exploration Company OYO Geospace These firms contract drilling rigs to oil and gas companies for both exploration and production. Transocean Diamond Offshore Drilling Noble Hercules Offshore Parker Drilling Company Pride International ENSCO International Atwood Oceanics Union Drilling Nabors Industries Grey Wolf Pioneer Drilling Co Patterson-UTI Energy Helmerich & Payne Rowan Companies Oil and Gas Pipeline Companies These companies build onshore pipelines to transport oil and gas between cities, states, and countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Shale Gas Study
    Foreign and Commonwealth Office Shale Gas Study Final Report April 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Report for Copyright and non-disclosure notice Tatiana Coutinho, Project Officer The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright Setor de Embaixadas Sul owned by Amec Foster Wheeler (© Amec Foster Wheeler Foreign and Commonwealth Office Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2015). save to the Bririah Embassy extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to Quadra 801, Conjunto K another party or is used by Amec Foster Wheeler under Brasilia, DF licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, Brazil it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or Main contributors copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Amec Foster Wheeler. Disclosure of that information may Pete Davis constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may Alex Melling otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party Daren Luscombe who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any Katherine Mason event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Rob Deanwood Silvio Jablonski, ANP Third-party disclaimer Issued by Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • K38: Subsurface Well Report Category: Storage
    January 2016 K38: Subsurface Well Report Category: Storage K38: Subsurface Well Report IMPORTANT NOTICE The information provided further to UK CCS Commercialisation Programme (the Competition) set out herein (the Information) has been prepared by Capture Power Limited and its sub-contractors (the Consortium) solely for the Department of Energy and Climate Change in connection with the Competition. The Information does not amount to advice on CCS technology or any CCS engineering, commercial, financial, regulatory, legal or other solutions on which any reliance should be placed. Accordingly, no member of the Consortium makes (and the UK Government does not make) any representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the Information and no reliance may be placed on the Information. In so far as permitted by law, no member of the Consortium or any company in the same group as any member of the Consortium or their respective officers, employees or agents accepts (and the UK Government does not accept) any responsibility or liability of any kind, whether for negligence or any other reason, for any damage or loss arising from any use of or any reliance placed on the Information or any subsequent communication of the Information. Each person to whom the Information is made available must make their own independent assessment of the Information after making such investigation and taking professional technical, engineering, commercial, regulatory, financial, legal or other advice,
    [Show full text]
  • DECC Consultation on Underground Drilling Access
    Underground Drilling Access Government Response to the Consultation on Proposal for Underground Access for the Extraction of Gas, Oil or Geothermal Energy 25 September 2014 © Crown copyright 2014 URN 14D/365 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] 2 General Information Purpose of this document: This document sets out the Government’s response to the consultation on a proposal for underground access for the extraction of gas, oil or geothermal energy, published on 23 May 2014. Issued: 25 September 2014 Enquiries to: The Office of Unconventional Gas and Oil and The Heat and Strategy Policy Team Department of Energy & Climate Change, 3 Whitehall Place, London, SW1A 2AW Email: [email protected] Territorial extent: The proposals discussed in this Government response apply to England, Wales and Scotland in respect to petroleum. The proposals on deep geothermal energy also cover England, Wales and Scotland (where in Scotland, deep geothermal energy is exploited for the sole, or main purpose of electricity generation). The use of deep geothermal energy for heat only purposes is devolved to the Scottish Government. In Northern Ireland, responsibility for petroleum and geothermal energy lies with the Northern Ireland Executive’s Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Margin Drilling
    Ocean Margin Drilling May 1980 NTIS order #PB80-198302 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 80-600083 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003-00754-1 PREFACE This Technical Memorandum was prepared in response to a request from the Chairman and the Ranking Minority Member of the HUD-Independent Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Committee requested that OTA conduct an evaluation of the Ocean Margin Drilling Program, a major new public-private cooperative research effort in marine geology proposed by the National Science Foundation. They were particularly interested in the scientific merits of the program and whether other, less costly alternatives could yield the same or greater scientific return. Because OTA already had a more general ongoing study of ocean research technology, the agency was able to respond quickly to this request. The Memorandum was prepared with the advice and assistance of a small panel of scientists plus a much broader group of scientists, engineers, petroleum company representatives, and others who submitted material for our use and reviewed our draft report. The study discusses the scientific merit of the program, possible alternatives to the present program plan, problems associated with technology development, aspects of petroleum company participation in the program, and government management considerations. There are also appendices including specific alternatives proposed by the OTA panel members and historical factors leading to the present plans. JOHN H. GIBBONS Director iii OTA Staff for Review of the Ocean Margin Drilling Program Robert Niblock, Ocean Program Manager Peter A.
    [Show full text]