DOCSLIB.ORG

Events Leading up to the American Revolution the French and Indian War (1754-63) War Fought Between Great Britain and Its Two E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Events Leading up to the American Revolution the French and Indian War (1754-63) War Fought Between Great Britain and Its Two E Events leading up to the American Revolution The French and Indian War (1754-63) War fought between Great Britain and its two enemies, the French and the Indians of North America. Most of the battles were in Canada. American colonists, including George Washington, fought with the British in this war, which lasted from 1754 to 1763. The British won the war and won the right to keep Canada and several other possessions in the New World. The Sugar Act (4/5/1764) 1764 Act that put a three-cent tax on foreign refined sugar and increased taxes on coffee, indigo, and certain kinds of wine. It banned importation of rum and French wines. These taxes affected only a certain part of the population, but the affected merchants were very vocal. Besides, the taxes were enacted (or raised) without the consent of the colonists. This was one of the first instances in which colonists wanted a say in how much they were taxed The Stamp Act (3/22/1765) First direct British tax on American colonists. Instituted in November, 1765. Every newspaper, pamphlet, and other public and legal document had to have a Stamp, or British seal, on it. The Stamp, of course, cost money. The colonists didn't think they should have to pay for something they had been doing for free for many years, and they responded in force, with demonstrations and even with a diplomatic body called the Stamp Act Congress, which delivered its answer to the Crown. Seeing the hostile reaction in the colonies, the British government repealed the Stamp Act in March 1766 but at the same time passed the Declaratory Act, which said that Great Britain was superior (and boss of) the American colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The Stamp Act gave the colonists a target for their rage. Indeed, the Sons of Liberty was formed in response to this Act. The Stamp Act Congress also gave the colonists a model for the Continental Congress. Patrick Henry's "If This Be Treason" speech (5/29/1765) Fiery orator and tireless champion of American independence who is best known for his speech ending with, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" He was an outspoken critic of the Stamp Act and introduced seven resolutions against it to the Virginia House of Burgesses. He was the first governor of Virginia and led the fight for the adoption of the Bill of Rights. The Stamp Act Congress (10/7-25/1765) Townshend Acts (6/29/1767) Series of 1767 laws named for Charles Townshend, British Chancellor of the Exchequer (Treasurer). These laws placed new taxes on glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea. Colonial reaction to these taxes was the same as to the Sugar Act and Stamp Act, and Britain eventually repealed all the taxes except the one on tea. In response to the sometimes violent protests by the American colonists, Great Britain sent more troops to the colonies. The Boston Massacre (3/5/1770) Shooting of five American colonists by British troops on March 5, 1770. One person, an African-American man named Crispus Attacks, was killed. Nearly every part of the story is disputed by both sides. Did the colonists have weapons? The British say rocks and other such weapons were hurled at them. But the British had guns, and they did open fire. The Boston Massacre deepened American distrust of the British military presence in the colonies. The Boston Tea Party (12/16/1773) Angry and frustrated at a new tax on tea, American colonists calling themselves the Sons of Liberty and disguised as Mohawk Native Americans boarded three British ships (the Dartmouth, the Eleanor, and the Beaver) and dumped 342 whole crates of British tea into Boston harbor on December 16, 1773. Similar incidents occurred in Maryland, New York, and New Jersey in the next few months, and tea was eventually boycotted throughout the colonies. The First Continental Congress (Philadelphia, 9/5-10/26/1774) Two groups of people from all over the 13 Colonies who came together to discuss liberty. The First Continental Congress was a group of 56 delegates from 12 colonies (all except Georgia) who met in Philadelphia in September of 1774. They came together to act together in response to the Intolerable Acts. They met in secret because they didn't want Great Britain to know that they were united. The Second Continental Congress met in 1775, when the Revolutionary war had started. Things were going badly, and the armed forces were disorganized. The Continental Congress created the Continental Army and named George Washington as commander-in-chief. The Congress continued through the summer. Out of the discussions came the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Marines Corps. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finance (No. 3) Bill
    Finance (No. 3) Bill EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS The Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Finance (No. 3) Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 282 57/1 Finance (No. 3) Bill CONTENTS PART 1 DIRECT TAXES Charge to tax 1 Income tax charge for tax year 2019-20 2 Corporation tax charge for financial year 2020 Income tax rates, allowances and limits 3 Main rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 4 Default and savings rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 5 Basic rate limit and personal allowance 6 Starting rate limit for savings for tax year 2019-20 Employment and social security income 7 Optional remuneration arrangements: arrangements for cars and vans 8 Exemption for benefit in form of vehicle-battery charging at workplace 9 Exemptions relating to emergency vehicles 10 Exemption for expenses related to travel 11 Beneficiaries of tax-exempt employer-provided pension benefits 12 Tax treatment of social security income Chargeable gains: interests in UK land etc 13 Disposals by non-UK residents etc 14 Disposals of UK land etc: payments on account of capital gains tax International matters 15 Offshore receipts in respect of intangible property 16 Avoidance involving profit fragmentation arrangements 17 Non-UK resident companies carrying on UK property businesses etc 18 Diverted profits tax 19 Hybrid and other mismatches: scope of Chapter 8 and “financial instrument” 20 Controlled foreign companies: finance company exemption and control Bill 282 57/1 ii Finance (No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest
    Page 33 Chapter 8 The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest espite the many arguments made against it, the Stamp Act was passed and scheduled to be enforced on November 1, 1765. The colonists found ever more vigorous and violent ways to D protest the Act. In Virginia, a tall backwoods lawyer, Patrick Henry, made a fiery speech and pushed five resolutions through the Virginia Assembly. In Boston, an angry mob inspired by Sam Adams and the Sons of Liberty destroyed property belonging to a man rumored to be a Stamp agent and to Lt. Governor Thomas Hutchinson. In New York, delegates from nine colonies, sitting as the Stamp Act Congress, petitioned the King and Parliament for repeal. In Philadelphia, New York, and other seaport towns, merchants pledged not to buy or sell British goods until the hated stamp tax was repealed. This storm of resistance and protest eventually had the desired effect. Stamp sgents hastily resigned their Commissions and not a single stamp was ever sold in the colonies. Meanwhile, British merchants petitioned Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act. In 1766, the law was repealed but replaced with the Declaratory Act, which stated that Parliament had the right to make laws binding on the colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The methods used to protest the Stamp Act raised issues concerning the use of illegal and violent protest, which are considered in this chapter. May: Patrick Henry and the Virginia Resolutions Patrick Henry had been a member of Virginia's House of Burgess (Assembly) for exactly nine days as the May session was drawing to a close.
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • IBMYP United States Government the Stamp Act – Background
    IBMYP United States Government denied these charges, and complained of British suspect that the British were intentionally plotting The Stamp Act – Background arrogance and contemptuousness in dealings with to enslave the colonists economically. the colonials. Commentary The French and Indian War – Results British troops also quarreled with colonial civilians, Summary who were often reluctant to provide food and The conflict between British and colonial soldiers shelter to the British, and consistently complained was indicative of the evolving attitudes of the two When the French and Indian War, and its of the troops' poor behavior. Pennsylvania regions toward one another. The colonies began European counterpart, the Seven Years War, Quakers, as pacifists, voted against appropriating to associate all things British with arrogance and officially came to a close with the Treaty of Paris in funds for the war effort, and Massachusetts and condescension, and the British viewed Americans 1763, North America was divided territorially New York also took a stand against the quartering as inept, irresponsible, and primitive. The colonial between the British and Spanish. Britain had of British troops in their colonies. British units in the war were involved primarily in support driven the French from the continent, and Parliament, and King George III, viewed these roles, providing reserve forces in battles and extended its land claims west to the Mississippi actions as antagonistic to the British effort to holding British forts. This way, the more highly River. It seemed that British holdings in North defend imperial territories. trained British professionals could lead the America and all over the world were more secure offensive against the French.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act Rebellion
    The Stamp Act Rebellion Grade Level: George III (1738-1820) From the “Encyclopedia of Virginia,” this biographical profile offers an overview of the life and achievements of George III during his fifty-one-year reign as king of Great Britain and Ireland. The personal background on George William Frederick includes birth, childhood, education, and experiences growing up in the royal House of Hanover. King George’s responses to events during the Seven Years’ War, the Irish Rebellion, and the French Revolution are analyzed with the help of historical drawings and documents. A “Time Line” from 1663 through 1820 appears at the end. Topic: George III, King of Great Britain, Great Britain--History--18th Language: English Lexile: 1400 century, Great Britain--Politics and government, England--Social life and customs URL: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org Grade Level: Stamp Act Crisis In 1766, Benjamin Franklin testified to Parliament about the Stamp Act and a month later it was repealed. The Stamp Act sparked the first widespread eruption of anti-British resistance. The primary source documents at this web site will help you understand why Parliament passed the tax and why so many Americans opposed it. The documents show the colonists' first widespread resistance to British authority and how they responded to their first victory in the revolutionary era. Discussion questions are included. Topic: Stamp Act (1765) Language: English Lexile: 1320 URL: http://americainclass.org Grade Level: American History Documents The online presence of the Indiana University's Lilly Library includes the virtual exhibition American History Documents. Complemented by enlargeable images of items from the library's actual collection, this site includes two entries related to the Stamp Act of 1765: the cover pages from An Act for Granting and Applying Certain Stamp Duties and Other Duties, in the British Colonies and Plantations in America, London and New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Lock and Theyanoguin: Case Studies in Native Diaspora, Cultural Adaptation and Persistence After King Philip's
    James Duggan NEH Living on the Edge of Empire Gateway Regional High School Grades 10-12. Grey Lock and Theyanoguin: Case Studies in Native Diaspora, Cultural Adaptation and Persistence After King Philip’s War Central Historical Question: In what ways did Woronoco and other Native peoples of the Connecticut River Valley survive, adapt, and persist in the years after King Philip’s War? OBJECTIVES Students will know: • Native peoples of the Westfield River Valley and the surrounding region experienced a diaspora in the years after King Philip’s War. • Diverse native peoples survived, persisted, crossed cultural boundaries, and adapted to changing times and circumstances in various ways. • Grey Lock and Theyanoguin followed different paths in their struggles to secure the survival of their people. • The New England frontier was a zone of cultural interaction as well as conflict. Students will: • Research the lives of Grey Lock and Theyanoguin. • Create annotated and illustrated timelines comparing and contrasting the lives of the two leaders. • Analyze and evaluate evidence in primary and secondary sources. • Determine the causes and consequences of Grey Lock’s War and other conflicts. • Write a document-based essay addressing the central question. RESOURCES Baxter, James. "Documentary History of the State of Maine." Baxter Manuscripts (1889): 209-211, 334- 337, 385-387. Internet Archive. Web. 9 Jul 2013. <http://archive.org/details/baxtermanuscript00baxtrich>. Bruchac, Margaret. “Pocumtuck: A Native Homeland.” Historic Deerfield Walking Tour. Historic Deerfield Inc., 2006. Calloway, Colin. Dawnland Encounters: Indians and Europeans in Northern New England. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1991. 84, 114, 136, 154-55, 159, 162, 207.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Necessity
    FORT NECESSITY Washington NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF French and English Rivalry Virginians under Colonel Joshua Fry proceeded Virginians and Indians started for the camp of THE INTERIOR: Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary westward from Virginia toward Monongahela. Jumonville, the French commander, which was National Park Service, Arthur E. Demaray, Director Rival claims between the French and English Washington, then a lieutenant colonel, was sec­ situated about 2 miles to the northward. to the trans-Allegheny territory approached a ond in command. While Fry remained at Wills Jumonville was taken by surprise. Ten of his men were killed; one wounded. Jumonville was among those killed. Twenty-one survivors were made prisoners, one man escaping to carry the news to the French at Fort Duquesne. In Wash­ ington's command only one man was killed and Fort two wounded. The man who was killed was buried on the spot. Surrender of Fort Necessity Mount Washington Tavern, located a few Old tollgate house built in 1814 on Old National Pike, a hundred feet from the site of Fort Necessity few miles east of Fort Necessity After the Jumonville fight, Washington Necessity undertook to fortify his position at Great The month of June was spent in opening a fort and began the attack. The fighting, which Meadows. He built a palisade fort during the road from Fort Necessity to a clearing in the began about 11 o'clock in the morning, con­ last 2 days of May and the first day of June. forest, known as Gist's Plantation, in the direc­ tinued sporadically until about 8 o'clock at National Battlefield Site In his journal entry for June 25, Washington tion of the forks of the Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST INDIES Why Did the British West Indies Fail to Support the American Revolt?
    WEST INDIES Why did the British West Indies fail to support the American revolt? Viewpoint: The British West Indies were far too dependent on the mother country economically, socially, and militarily to join the American War of Inde- pendence. Viewpoint: The white inhabitants of the British Caribbean had more conserva- tive views of the English constitution and Empire than those held by Americans. Great Britain possessed twenty-six colonies in the Americas, but only the thirteen mainland colonies rebelled against the mother country in 1775. Why? The refusal of the British West Indies to support the American rebel- lion is puzzling, especially considering that the sugar islands had close social and economic ties with the mainland colonies and shared many of the essential preconditions of the American Revolution (1775-1783). As early as 1651, for example, Barbadians denied Parliament's right to tax them on the grounds that legislation without representation was a violation of their rights as Englishmen. Thirty years later Jamaica's assembly suc- cessfully established its right to legislate in all domestic matters. Like their mainland counterparts, the island colonists during the eighteenth century sought increasing control over internal taxation, the local militia, the islands' defenses, the administering of governmental expenditures, the appointment of local officials, and the executive-decision-making process. The republi- can ideology of the American Revolution and Britain's attempt to subdue the Americans by force intensified these political contests and created a politi- cal and constitutional crisis on some Caribbean islands. Local assemblies made claims of coequality with the House of Commons and usurped execu- tive powers, while some island colonists refused to pay taxes and perse- cuted government officials determined to uphold the Crown's prerogative.
    [Show full text]
  • Wars of Empire
    hsus_te_ch03_na_s04_s.fm Page 85 Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:41 AM WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Rogers’ Rangers Step-by-Step The struggle for territory between England and France in North America broke into open conflict during the French and Indian SECTION Instruction War. From 1754 to 1763, the region between the Ohio Valley and Canada became a battlefield. To help win the war, England SECTION authorized units of Rangers—groups of colonial militiamen who served as scouts and soldiers—to aid English Crown soldiers. Rogers’ Rangers, led by Robert Rogers of New Objectives Hampshire, became famous for including Indians and freed As you teach this section, keep students slaves in its ranks and for its unusual but highly effective focused on the following objectives to help tactics. As Rogers explained, his goals were: them answer the Section Focus Question and “. from time to time, to use my best endeavours to distress master core content. the French and their allies, by sacking, burning, and destroying • Describe the causes and major events of their houses, barns, barracks, canoes,... and by killing their the French and Indian War. cattle . and at all times to endeavor to way-lay, attack and destroy their convoys of provisions by land and water, in any • Analyze the causes and effects of Pon- part of the country where I could find them.” tiac’s Rebellion. —Robert Rogers, 1756 • Summarize how the wars and their out- comes changed the relationship between ᮡ Robert Rogers Britain and the colonies. ᮡ Rogers’ Rangers Wars of Empire Prepare to Read Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Why It Matters Conflict between the great European empires Remind students that Britain, Spain, • Describe the causes and major events of the spread to the American colonies throughout the late seventeenth and and France were economic and political French and Indian War.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.) Why Were the British Concerned About French Activity in the Ohio River Valley?
    Cause Effect French and Indian War Need to tax for military funds Sugar Act Boycott/ Sons of Liberty Quartering Act­ 1765 Boycott/Sons of Liberty Stamp Act Repealed­ 1766 Stamp Act­1765 Declaratory Act­1766 Townshend Acts­ 1767 Boston Massacre­ 1770 Tea Act­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Intolerable Acts­ 1774 Nov 17­9:36 AM Review Questions: 1.) Why were the British concerned about French activity in the Ohio River valley? The British also claimed the Ohio River valley. 2.) What fatal errors did General Edward Braddock make? He tried to fight using tactics that worked in Europe and did not adapt to North American conditions. 3.) What was the outcome of the Battle of Quebec? The British defeated the French, who were no longer able to defend the rest of its North American territory. Nov 17­9:35 AM 1 *1763 ­ Colonists • loyal British subjects • identified with each other more than with Britain • French and Indian War left Britain in debt • British government had to keep troops in North America so France did not try to regain its lost territory and to protect settlers against Native American attacks. Nov 17­10:05 AM The Sugar Act 1764­ Sugar Act passed. It put a duty, or import tax, on several products, including molasses. Nov 17­10:05 AM 2 boycott ­ an organized campaign to refuse to buy certain products ­ of British goods; protests spread to every colony *Smugglers would receive harsh punishments; colonial merchants (who sometimes traded in smuggled goods) protested Nov 17­10:08 AM The Quartering Act • *1765 ­ Quartering Act passed to save money • Britain kept about 10,000 soldiers in colonies • Act required colonists to quarter, or allow soldiers to live in their homes, and provide them with food and other supplies Nov 17­10:05 AM 3 *Colonists protested and complained Parliament was violating their rights Committees of Correspondence • need to keep in closer contact with people in other colonies • Samuel Adams (cousin to John) established the Committee of Correspondence to keep colonists informed of British actions.
    [Show full text]
  • French and Indian
    Build up to 7 Years War Boston, Mass. (Greatest American Seaport) Map of colonies Life in the French colonies French and Indian War Treaty of Paris Impact of the war Pontiac’s rebellion Proclamation of 1763 Enlightenment ideas influenced the colonists The Great Awakening Seeds of the American Revolution 3 Life in the French Colonies White settlers and Indians at a French settlement often intermingled and even had children who became French citizens. 4 Differences between French and British colonies New France was more than double the size of British Colonies, yet much less populated British more interested in bringing settlers from mother country French more interested in making Native Americans into French citizens. They treated Indians as equals and intermarried. French interested in fur trade w/ natives French tended to develop stronger alliances with Indians 6 King William’s War 1688-1697 • Count Frontenac, governor of New France, refused English demands to surrender during the Battle of Quebec (1690). Queen Anne’s War • The peace deal in Utrecht in 1713 gave Acadia, Newfoundland, and Hudson Bay to England The War of Jenkins’s Ear – An English Captain named Jenkins had his ear cut off by a Spanish commander, who sneered at him to go home crying. This war was confined to the Caribbean Sea and Georgia King George’s War in America • This war soon merged with the War of Austrian Succession and came to be called King George’s War in America Acadians • Attack on Louisburg. • English forced the French to leave the area of Canada they controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate II: Issues in Ownership of Real Property
    Global Practice Guide Real Estate II: Issues in Ownership of Real Property A Global Practice Guide prepared by the Lex Mundi Real Estate Group This guide is part of the Lex Mundi Global Practice Guide Series which features substantive overviews of laws, practice areas, and legal and business issues in jurisdictions around the globe. View the complete series at: www.lexmundi.com/GlobalPracticeGuides. Lex Mundi is the world’s leading network of independent law firms with in-depth experience in 100+ countries. Through close collaboration, our member firms are able to offer their clients preferred access to more than 21,000 lawyers worldwide – a global resource of unmatched breadth and depth. Lex Mundi – the law firms that know your markets. www.lexmundi.com About this Guide This multi-part Guide of Issues in Real Estate Investment and Finance presents jurisdictional overviews of real estate investment and financing laws in jurisdictions around the world, covering the following four general topics: Part I -- Foreign Investment Part II -- Ownership of Real Property Part III – Finance Part IV – Leasing Table of Contents Argentina ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]