IBMYP United States Government the Stamp Act – Background

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IBMYP United States Government the Stamp Act – Background IBMYP United States Government denied these charges, and complained of British suspect that the British were intentionally plotting The Stamp Act – Background arrogance and contemptuousness in dealings with to enslave the colonists economically. the colonials. Commentary The French and Indian War – Results British troops also quarreled with colonial civilians, Summary who were often reluctant to provide food and The conflict between British and colonial soldiers shelter to the British, and consistently complained was indicative of the evolving attitudes of the two When the French and Indian War, and its of the troops' poor behavior. Pennsylvania regions toward one another. The colonies began European counterpart, the Seven Years War, Quakers, as pacifists, voted against appropriating to associate all things British with arrogance and officially came to a close with the Treaty of Paris in funds for the war effort, and Massachusetts and condescension, and the British viewed Americans 1763, North America was divided territorially New York also took a stand against the quartering as inept, irresponsible, and primitive. The colonial between the British and Spanish. Britain had of British troops in their colonies. British units in the war were involved primarily in support driven the French from the continent, and Parliament, and King George III, viewed these roles, providing reserve forces in battles and extended its land claims west to the Mississippi actions as antagonistic to the British effort to holding British forts. This way, the more highly River. It seemed that British holdings in North defend imperial territories. trained British professionals could lead the America and all over the world were more secure offensive against the French. Despite their Another major area of contention was taxation. than ever, but there were signs of trouble brewing separation of duties, the troops interacted often The colonies had profited greatly form the war. in the American colonies. The French had been enough to decide that they disliked each other, Military contracts and expenditures by British driven from the continent by a coalition of Britons, and each side registered frequent complaints troops had meant a large inflow of British colonists, and Native Americans. However, once about the other. peace was restored, this three-pronged alliance currency. Trade flourished, and many American's showed signs of crumbling. traded with the French West Indies. This trade The conflict of soldiers and civilians highlighted a was illegal in peace time, and seen as morally major complaint of the colonists throughout the One source of conflict arose between the colonial reprehensible during a war against the French, but period of time leading up to the revolution. The and British soldiers. In Britain, it was widely it proved very profitable. Meanwhile, the British colonists were perpetually wary of British assumed that the professional troops sent to the national debt had climbed from 72 million pounds meddling in colonial affairs, and saw the military colonies deserved full credit for British victory in before the war to 132 million at its end. To pay as the primary on-site actors in this effort. Fearing the war. In reality, about 40 percent of the regular down this debt, Britain instituted a land tax at the installation of standing armies, the colonies, soldiers who served in the war enlisted in home, and imposed excise tax on many commonly throughout their histories, had been reluctant to America. American soldiers complained constantly traded goods. supply and house British troops. During the French during and after the war that British public and Indian War this reluctance caused King However, the colonists felt burdened as well. opinion drastically underestimated America's part. George and the Parliament to question the loyalty During the war, prosperous colonists had of some colonies and led the British government British soldiers, for their part, bemoaned the developed a taste for imported goods. In fact, the to commit even more strongly to keeping a strong ineptitude of the colonial troops. They claimed the annual value of British imports to the colonies had British hand in colonial business. colonials were useless in battle and had no real doubled. Once the wartime economic boom sense of duty, tending to return home, even in the ended, many Americans went into debt trying to The issue of taxation was one that would drive a midst of a campaign, when their terms were up or maintain their middle-class lifestyle. Colonial wedge between the colonies and their mother they were not paid on time. Colonial troops debts to Britain grew rapidly, and many began to country from this time until the end of the to one-fifth of the military expenses in North Nova Scotia. Until 1768, vice-admiralty judges revolution. In Britain, citizens were forced to pay America. The Sugar Act signaled the end of were awarded five percent of all confiscated cargo exorbitant taxes on land and traded goods in colonial exemption from revenue-raising taxation. and ships, a clear incentive to come to a guilty order to support Britain's skyrocketing debt. These Previous acts, such as the long-standing verdict. The vice-admiralty courts also reversed citizens looked across the ocean to see the Navigation Acts, had been passed as protectionist traditional judicial ideology, by burdening the colonists not pulling anywhere close to equal measures, regulating trade to boost the economy defendant with the task of disproving the charge weight, even though the colonists had been the of the British Empire as a whole. Under the of smuggling rather than assuming innocence until primary beneficiaries of the war. Colonists Navigation Acts, taxes were paid by British guilt was proven. continued to assert their freedom from taxation importers alone, rather than the colonists, and British Prime Minister George Grenville ordered and reminded British rulers that they had not brought in just 1,800 pounds in 1763, compared the navy to enforce the Sugar Act, and it did so called for the war. Still, even though many with a cost of 8,000 pounds just to enforce the vigorously. Still colonists continued to smuggle Americans went through hard times because of acts. molasses until 1766, when the duty on foreign the collapse of the wartime boom, the colonists The Sugar Act lowered the duty on foreign- molasses was lowered to one penny. The Sugar could not deny the facts. The colonial debt totaled produced molasses from six pence per gallon to 3 Act provided the British treasury with about 2 million pounds to Britain's 132 million. In fact, pence per gallon, in attempts to discourage 30,000 pounds per year between 1766 and 1775, just the interest charges on Britain's debt cost the smuggling. The act further stipulated that a substantial source of income. empire 4 million pounds per year. Still, the Americans could export many commodities, colonists railed against taxation. Nine provincial legislatures in America protested including lumber, iron, skins, and whalebone, to the passage of the Sugar Act, but seven of these Emerging after the war was a new dynamic in foreign countries, only if they passed through objected on narrow grounds. Though many Anglo-American relations. The British sought to British ports first. The act also placed a heavy tax colonists objected to the act's revenue-raising control their colonial possessions more tightly, on formerly duty- free Madeira wine from taxation and regulation, opposition was minor, and sent greater numbers of officials to America, Portugal. due to a lack of organization and the hesitancy of imposed regulations on trade, and restricted The Sugar Act complicated trade for American the legislatures to take a stand against Parliament. territorial expansion to this effect. The colonies, shippers by requiring them to fill out a number of on the other hand, wished to be free to govern confusing forms in order to legalize their themselves, to trade as they desired, and to Commentary shipments. If even the smallest technicality was expand into the West. The French and Indian war not attended to, ships' captains could have their The Sugar Act was one of the first tangible signs of was hailed as a victory for Britain in its attempt to entire cargo seized. Further, the act could be Britain's intent to gain tighter control over colonial control its colonies, but the conditions employed in some cases regarding local trade trade. Parliament predicted that if shippers had to immediately after the war's close set the stage for along the east coast, and in many cases put stop at British ports en route to other destinations a widening rift rather than the maintenance of unrealistic restrictions on this trade. they would be more likely to purchase imperial affable relations. goods to bring back with them to the colonies, and The Sugar Act In addition to a restriction of trade, many colonists thus boost Britain's flailing economy. Parliament Summary felt the Sugar Act constituted a restriction of imagined it could further collect a great amount in justice. The act allowed customs officials to revenue and discourage smuggling by lowering the In 1764 Parliament passed the Sugar Act, with the transfer smuggling cases from colonial courts with duties. Parliamentary leaders reasoned that with goal of raising 100,000 pounds, an amount equal juries to juryless vice- admiralty courts in Halifax, the duty set at three pence, colonists would be one's peers. Not only did the Sugar Act provide for taxed without representation in Parliament. less likely to smuggle than they had been when the relocation of trials from the colonies to Grenville and his followers claimed that they the duty was six pence, and thus more likely to Halifax, Nova Scotia, far from the setting in which agreed with Pitt, and that the colonies were pay, leading to a higher income for the British infractions had taken place, it also allowed trials represented in Parliament, even though they did treasury.
Recommended publications
  • Music and the American Civil War
    “LIBERTY’S GREAT AUXILIARY”: MUSIC AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by CHRISTIAN MCWHIRTER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Christian McWhirter 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Music was almost omnipresent during the American Civil War. Soldiers, civilians, and slaves listened to and performed popular songs almost constantly. The heightened political and emotional climate of the war created a need for Americans to express themselves in a variety of ways, and music was one of the best. It did not require a high level of literacy and it could be performed in groups to ensure that the ideas embedded in each song immediately reached a large audience. Previous studies of Civil War music have focused on the music itself. Historians and musicologists have examined the types of songs published during the war and considered how they reflected the popular mood of northerners and southerners. This study utilizes the letters, diaries, memoirs, and newspapers of the 1860s to delve deeper and determine what roles music played in Civil War America. This study begins by examining the explosion of professional and amateur music that accompanied the onset of the Civil War. Of the songs produced by this explosion, the most popular and resonant were those that addressed the political causes of the war and were adopted as the rallying cries of northerners and southerners. All classes of Americans used songs in a variety of ways, and this study specifically examines the role of music on the home-front, in the armies, and among African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance (No. 3) Bill
    Finance (No. 3) Bill EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS The Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Finance (No. 3) Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 282 57/1 Finance (No. 3) Bill CONTENTS PART 1 DIRECT TAXES Charge to tax 1 Income tax charge for tax year 2019-20 2 Corporation tax charge for financial year 2020 Income tax rates, allowances and limits 3 Main rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 4 Default and savings rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 5 Basic rate limit and personal allowance 6 Starting rate limit for savings for tax year 2019-20 Employment and social security income 7 Optional remuneration arrangements: arrangements for cars and vans 8 Exemption for benefit in form of vehicle-battery charging at workplace 9 Exemptions relating to emergency vehicles 10 Exemption for expenses related to travel 11 Beneficiaries of tax-exempt employer-provided pension benefits 12 Tax treatment of social security income Chargeable gains: interests in UK land etc 13 Disposals by non-UK residents etc 14 Disposals of UK land etc: payments on account of capital gains tax International matters 15 Offshore receipts in respect of intangible property 16 Avoidance involving profit fragmentation arrangements 17 Non-UK resident companies carrying on UK property businesses etc 18 Diverted profits tax 19 Hybrid and other mismatches: scope of Chapter 8 and “financial instrument” 20 Controlled foreign companies: finance company exemption and control Bill 282 57/1 ii Finance (No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest
    Page 33 Chapter 8 The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest espite the many arguments made against it, the Stamp Act was passed and scheduled to be enforced on November 1, 1765. The colonists found ever more vigorous and violent ways to D protest the Act. In Virginia, a tall backwoods lawyer, Patrick Henry, made a fiery speech and pushed five resolutions through the Virginia Assembly. In Boston, an angry mob inspired by Sam Adams and the Sons of Liberty destroyed property belonging to a man rumored to be a Stamp agent and to Lt. Governor Thomas Hutchinson. In New York, delegates from nine colonies, sitting as the Stamp Act Congress, petitioned the King and Parliament for repeal. In Philadelphia, New York, and other seaport towns, merchants pledged not to buy or sell British goods until the hated stamp tax was repealed. This storm of resistance and protest eventually had the desired effect. Stamp sgents hastily resigned their Commissions and not a single stamp was ever sold in the colonies. Meanwhile, British merchants petitioned Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act. In 1766, the law was repealed but replaced with the Declaratory Act, which stated that Parliament had the right to make laws binding on the colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The methods used to protest the Stamp Act raised issues concerning the use of illegal and violent protest, which are considered in this chapter. May: Patrick Henry and the Virginia Resolutions Patrick Henry had been a member of Virginia's House of Burgess (Assembly) for exactly nine days as the May session was drawing to a close.
    [Show full text]
  • PUB DUE Three At,Ated Reading Guides Were Aeveloped
    411.. X %. itomesTit1180111 RD 181 929 IS 000 043 AUTHOR Schneider, Eric C.: And Others .TITLE Boston:1411 Orban Community. Boston and the American - RevcilutiOn: The Leaders, the*Issue!and the Common Man. Boston's Architecture: From First Tawnhouseto New City Hall. Boston's Artisans of the Eighteenth Century. Annotated Reading Lists. INSTITUTION Bos.ton Public Library, Hass. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the_Humanities(NFAH),' Washington, O.C PUB DUE 77 NOTE Fo'irelated documentso'see IRJ 008 042-046 EDRS PRICE HF01/PC03 Plus Postage: ,DESCRIPTORS Annotated BibliographAes: 4gArchitecture:*Craftsmen; Educational Programs: HumanitiesInstruction: *Local History: Public' Librarikts: Resource Guidesi Apevoldtionar.War (Onited.statefl ABSTRA.CT The three at,ated reading guideswere Aeveloped for courses offeced At the Bos_n Public,Library under the,National Endowments,for the'Human ).ties Library LearningProgram. The first lists-42 selectedrece t works of major importance covering theareas of colonial society, political structure,and the Aterican .Revolutivon.piel27 titles cited in thesecoud include not only books about Bostoearehitectureet but books aboutBoston which deal With '7 various of the city's buildings: guidebooksto 'individual buildings have been excluded. The 31 readingson Boston's artisans and their products are (II:Added into three sections:(1) the topography of th city from 1726 to 1815:(2) the artisan coamunfty and thesoc structure of'Boston, focusingon the-role'of craftsmen i Revolution and their cheinging social status:and,(3) e crafts of 18th century.Boston anA some biographical materialsot individuai 'artisans. (RAA) 4 f ****-*************************************************.*********4******** 1;4 Reproluctions suppli44 by raps are the beet thatcan be eaCle frou.the original docuaellt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act Rebellion
    The Stamp Act Rebellion Grade Level: George III (1738-1820) From the “Encyclopedia of Virginia,” this biographical profile offers an overview of the life and achievements of George III during his fifty-one-year reign as king of Great Britain and Ireland. The personal background on George William Frederick includes birth, childhood, education, and experiences growing up in the royal House of Hanover. King George’s responses to events during the Seven Years’ War, the Irish Rebellion, and the French Revolution are analyzed with the help of historical drawings and documents. A “Time Line” from 1663 through 1820 appears at the end. Topic: George III, King of Great Britain, Great Britain--History--18th Language: English Lexile: 1400 century, Great Britain--Politics and government, England--Social life and customs URL: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org Grade Level: Stamp Act Crisis In 1766, Benjamin Franklin testified to Parliament about the Stamp Act and a month later it was repealed. The Stamp Act sparked the first widespread eruption of anti-British resistance. The primary source documents at this web site will help you understand why Parliament passed the tax and why so many Americans opposed it. The documents show the colonists' first widespread resistance to British authority and how they responded to their first victory in the revolutionary era. Discussion questions are included. Topic: Stamp Act (1765) Language: English Lexile: 1320 URL: http://americainclass.org Grade Level: American History Documents The online presence of the Indiana University's Lilly Library includes the virtual exhibition American History Documents. Complemented by enlargeable images of items from the library's actual collection, this site includes two entries related to the Stamp Act of 1765: the cover pages from An Act for Granting and Applying Certain Stamp Duties and Other Duties, in the British Colonies and Plantations in America, London and New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • British Settlement
    BRITISH SETTLEMENT I.) Rationale - changes in England - 6 wives of Henry VIII - population growth - enclosure - rivalry between England & Spain - easy money (?) II.) Roanoke, 1587-1590 - followed Spanish Model - Sir Walter Raleigh III.) The Chesapeake Region--Virginia - Jamestown, 1607 - the Joint-Stock Company - "Gentlemen" - The Starving Time - Captain John Smith - Pocahontas - Tobacco - House of Burgesses, 1619 1 IV.) The Chesapeake Region--Maryland - Sir George Calvert, 2nd Lord of Baltimore - Religious toleration (?) 2 NEW ENGLAND—THE SEPARATISTS AND THE PURITANS I..) Plymouth, 1620 - Separatists (Pilgrims) - Mayflower Compact II.) Massachusetts Bay, 1630 - Puritans - Freedom, not tolerance - John Winthrop - "A Modell of Christian Charity" - Great Chain of Being - "City upon a hill" - Importance of community - Town, Church, and Education - Harvard, 1636 III.) Problems in paradise - Roger Williams - Rhode Island - Ann Hutchinson 3 IV.)A Cautionary Note on Puritan Society--Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692 - adolescent girls & Tituba - spectral evidence - why? - spoiled grain - puberty and menopause - women out of place - Salem town and Salem village 4 THE NEW BRITISH COLONIES I.) Background -- The English Civil War - Charles I, reigned 1625-1649 - Parliament and the Puritans - Civil War, 1642 - Oliver Cromwell - The Restoration, 1660 II.) Proprietary Colonies - Colonies given as gifts to men who had been loyal to the crown during Civil War. 5 SERVANTS AND SLAVES I.) Europe: Too many people, not enough land America: Too much land, not
    [Show full text]
  • WEST INDIES Why Did the British West Indies Fail to Support the American Revolt?
    WEST INDIES Why did the British West Indies fail to support the American revolt? Viewpoint: The British West Indies were far too dependent on the mother country economically, socially, and militarily to join the American War of Inde- pendence. Viewpoint: The white inhabitants of the British Caribbean had more conserva- tive views of the English constitution and Empire than those held by Americans. Great Britain possessed twenty-six colonies in the Americas, but only the thirteen mainland colonies rebelled against the mother country in 1775. Why? The refusal of the British West Indies to support the American rebel- lion is puzzling, especially considering that the sugar islands had close social and economic ties with the mainland colonies and shared many of the essential preconditions of the American Revolution (1775-1783). As early as 1651, for example, Barbadians denied Parliament's right to tax them on the grounds that legislation without representation was a violation of their rights as Englishmen. Thirty years later Jamaica's assembly suc- cessfully established its right to legislate in all domestic matters. Like their mainland counterparts, the island colonists during the eighteenth century sought increasing control over internal taxation, the local militia, the islands' defenses, the administering of governmental expenditures, the appointment of local officials, and the executive-decision-making process. The republi- can ideology of the American Revolution and Britain's attempt to subdue the Americans by force intensified these political contests and created a politi- cal and constitutional crisis on some Caribbean islands. Local assemblies made claims of coequality with the House of Commons and usurped execu- tive powers, while some island colonists refused to pay taxes and perse- cuted government officials determined to uphold the Crown's prerogative.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOSTON MASSACRE: Design Or Accident
    THE BOSTON MASSACRE: Design or Accident BY PETER BRODKIN Mr. Brodkin is a graduate student in history at Rutgers University. The author would like to thank the staff of the Rutgers University Libraries for their help in the completion of this article. f^ftK EkttI 5oq*A EwcJ BOSTON 1770 Government and Business Center* Key 1. Sentry Box 4. Town House 2. Customs House 5. William Hunter's House 3. Main Guard 6. The Market * Annie Haven Thwing, The Crooked and Narrow Streets of the Town of Boston (Boston: Charles E. Lauriat Co., 1930), opposite page 78. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 79 It is a paradox of the violence in Boston during the years of 1765 to 1770 that although the rioters seemed uncontrolled and uncontrollable, they were in fact under an almost military discipline. The Boston Mob's ardor there is little doubt, could be turned on or off to suit the policies of its directors.1 OST historians studying the actions of the mob in pre-Revolu- tionary America, and especially in Boston, would agree that Mmany of these riots although seemingly spontaneous were ac- tually organized with certain political ends in mind. John Shy, in his book Toward Lexington, indicates that mob action was one of a number of political weapons used by local leaders. The "first resistance to the troops in Boston occurred not on the waterfront but in the Court House."2 In almost all instances, according to Shy, when the town elders had certain grievances against the methods of the English they first tried to alleviate the problems through the legal means of petition and court action.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy
    Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy End of “Salutary Neglect” Re-Assert authority over Colonies Taxation for Revenue What economic confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Military Issue Colonials British Methods of •Indian-style guerilla March in formation or fighting tactics bayonet charge Organization •Militias served under Officers wanted to take own captains charge of colonials •No military Drills and tough Discipline deference or discipline protocols observed Colonists should pay for •Resistance to raising their own defense Finances taxes “Prima Donna” officers •Casual, non- with servants and tea Demeanor professionals Post War Tension – Military Troop deployment British left about 10,000 troops in America Fear of French rebellion in Canada Fear of Indian attacks Keep colonists from crossing Proclamation Line Fear of independence movement What confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Economic War taxes British response Massachusetts refused to Currency Act of 1764 pay without military must pay with British control currency Virginia refused to pay; Parliament controls printed money to pay colonial currency debts (inflation) Revenue Act of 1762 Ensure collection of customs Royal Navy prohibit trade with French Post War Tension – Economic Result of French and Indian and Seven Years War National debt doubles New Prime Minister Lord Bute needed payment plan New King, George III, wanted debt paid Began to strictly enforce taxes in England Post War Tension – Political Reforms
    [Show full text]
  • Events Leading up to the American Revolution the French and Indian War (1754-63) War Fought Between Great Britain and Its Two E
    Events leading up to the American Revolution The French and Indian War (1754-63) War fought between Great Britain and its two enemies, the French and the Indians of North America. Most of the battles were in Canada. American colonists, including George Washington, fought with the British in this war, which lasted from 1754 to 1763. The British won the war and won the right to keep Canada and several other possessions in the New World. The Sugar Act (4/5/1764) 1764 Act that put a three-cent tax on foreign refined sugar and increased taxes on coffee, indigo, and certain kinds of wine. It banned importation of rum and French wines. These taxes affected only a certain part of the population, but the affected merchants were very vocal. Besides, the taxes were enacted (or raised) without the consent of the colonists. This was one of the first instances in which colonists wanted a say in how much they were taxed The Stamp Act (3/22/1765) First direct British tax on American colonists. Instituted in November, 1765. Every newspaper, pamphlet, and other public and legal document had to have a Stamp, or British seal, on it. The Stamp, of course, cost money. The colonists didn't think they should have to pay for something they had been doing for free for many years, and they responded in force, with demonstrations and even with a diplomatic body called the Stamp Act Congress, which delivered its answer to the Crown. Seeing the hostile reaction in the colonies, the British government repealed the Stamp Act in March 1766 but at the same time passed the Declaratory Act, which said that Great Britain was superior (and boss of) the American colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The Stamp Act gave the colonists a target for their rage.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons of Liberty, 1765
    Sons of Liberty, 1765 Case Western Reserve University Model United Nations Spring Conference 2020 CWRUMUN•CCWA Spring Conference 2020 FROM YOUR CRISIS DIRECTOR Dear Delegates, My name is Sydney Olney, and it is with distinct pleasure that I welcome you to the Sons of Liberty, 1765 Crisis Committee! Sons of Liberty, 1765 is based on the activity of various chapters of the revolutionary organization, most notably, the Boston and New York groups. This committee will provide delegates with the unique opportunity to exercise their knowledge of revolutionary history in a fast-paced, dynamic, and contemporary setting. As delegates of Sons of Liberty, 1765, you will fight for representation, utilize the power of the mob, and influence the trajectory of the American colonies towards (or away from) revolution. The fate of your countrymen is in your hands! I anticipate that many of you will be completely new to crisis—that is okay. We will reward research, hard work, and initiative. An involved and inexperienced delegate will have more impact on committee than a disengaged veteran. The committee will also look favorably on well- rounded delegates who are able to balance speaking time, directives, and crisis notes. As such, try your best not to neglect one part of your role for another, as every aspect of delegate performance will be considered when determining awards. My utmost hope for our two days together is that all of you will be able to learn and grow as delegates. I didn’t start Model United Nations, until college, so I know what it’s like to feel completely out of your depth in a committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.) Why Were the British Concerned About French Activity in the Ohio River Valley?
    Cause Effect French and Indian War Need to tax for military funds Sugar Act Boycott/ Sons of Liberty Quartering Act­ 1765 Boycott/Sons of Liberty Stamp Act Repealed­ 1766 Stamp Act­1765 Declaratory Act­1766 Townshend Acts­ 1767 Boston Massacre­ 1770 Tea Act­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Intolerable Acts­ 1774 Nov 17­9:36 AM Review Questions: 1.) Why were the British concerned about French activity in the Ohio River valley? The British also claimed the Ohio River valley. 2.) What fatal errors did General Edward Braddock make? He tried to fight using tactics that worked in Europe and did not adapt to North American conditions. 3.) What was the outcome of the Battle of Quebec? The British defeated the French, who were no longer able to defend the rest of its North American territory. Nov 17­9:35 AM 1 *1763 ­ Colonists • loyal British subjects • identified with each other more than with Britain • French and Indian War left Britain in debt • British government had to keep troops in North America so France did not try to regain its lost territory and to protect settlers against Native American attacks. Nov 17­10:05 AM The Sugar Act 1764­ Sugar Act passed. It put a duty, or import tax, on several products, including molasses. Nov 17­10:05 AM 2 boycott ­ an organized campaign to refuse to buy certain products ­ of British goods; protests spread to every colony *Smugglers would receive harsh punishments; colonial merchants (who sometimes traded in smuggled goods) protested Nov 17­10:08 AM The Quartering Act • *1765 ­ Quartering Act passed to save money • Britain kept about 10,000 soldiers in colonies • Act required colonists to quarter, or allow soldiers to live in their homes, and provide them with food and other supplies Nov 17­10:05 AM 3 *Colonists protested and complained Parliament was violating their rights Committees of Correspondence • need to keep in closer contact with people in other colonies • Samuel Adams (cousin to John) established the Committee of Correspondence to keep colonists informed of British actions.
    [Show full text]