Phase Changes Do Now

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Phase Changes Do Now: What are the names for the phases that matter goes through when changing from solid to liquid to gas, and then back again? States of Matter - Review By adding energy, usually in the form of heat, the bonds that hold a solid together can slowly break apart. The object goes from one state, or phase, to another. These changes are called PHASE CHANGES. Solids A solid is an ordered arrangement of particles that have very little movement. The particles vibrate back and forth but remain closely attracted to each other. Liquids A liquid is an arrangement of less ordered particles that have gained energy and can move about more freely. Their attraction is less than a solid. Compare the two states: Gases By adding energy, solids can change from an ordered arrangement to a less ordered arrangement (liquid), and finally to a very random arrangement of the particles (the gas phase). Each phase change has a specific name, based on what is happening to the particles of matter. Melting and Freezing The solid, ordered The less ordered liquid molecules gain energy, molecules loose energy, collide more, and slow down, and become become less ordered. more ordered. Condensation and Vaporization The more ordered liquid molecules gain energy, speed The less ordered gas up, and become less ordered. molecules loose energy, Evaporation only occurs at slow down, and become the surface of a liquid. more ordered. Boiling occurs throughout the liquid. The linked image cannot be displayed. The ﬁle may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct ﬁle and location. Sublimation and Deposition The less ordered gas looses energy, The more ordered solid molecules slow gains energy, the down, and become a molecules speed up and solid (frost). Liquid become less ordered gas. phase is bypassed Liquid phase is bypassed. Phase changes are classified as one of two types: 1. ENDOTHERMIC – The object absorbs energy from the surroundings. Think of ENDO as “entering”: energy comes into the object. What is happening to the particles? 2. EXOTHERMIC – The object releases energy to the surroundings. Think of EXO as “exiting”: energy goes out of the object. What is happening to the particles now? Now we can complete the remaining two columns of the study guide. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Lecture Notes: BCS Theory of Superconductivity
Lecture Notes: BCS theory of superconductivity Prof. Rafael M. Fernandes Here we will discuss a new ground state of the interacting electron gas: the superconducting state. In this macroscopic quantum state, the electrons form coherent bound states called Cooper pairs, which dramatically change the macroscopic properties of the system, giving rise to perfect conductivity and perfect diamagnetism. We will mostly focus on conventional superconductors, where the Cooper pairs originate from a small attractive electron-electron interaction mediated by phonons. However, in the so- called unconventional superconductors - a topic of intense research in current solid state physics - the pairing can originate even from purely repulsive interactions. 1 Phenomenology Superconductivity was discovered by Kamerlingh-Onnes in 1911, when he was studying the transport properties of Hg (mercury) at low temperatures. He found that below the liquifying temperature of helium, at around 4:2 K, the resistivity of Hg would suddenly drop to zero. Although at the time there was not a well established model for the low-temperature behavior of transport in metals, the result was quite surprising, as the expectations were that the resistivity would either go to zero or diverge at T = 0, but not vanish at a ﬁnite temperature. In a metal the resistivity at low temperatures has a constant contribution from impurity scattering, a T 2 contribution from electron-electron scattering, and a T 5 contribution from phonon scattering. Thus, the vanishing of the resistivity at low temperatures is a clear indication of a new ground state. Another key property of the superconductor was discovered in 1933 by Meissner.
[Show full text]
Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Positron-Emitting Radioisotopes from Solid Target Matrices
XA0101188 11. United States of America Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Positron-Emitting Radioisotopes From Solid Target Matrices D. Schlyer, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Upton, Bldg. 901, New York 11973-5000, USA Project Description Supercritical fluids are attractive as media for both chemical reactions, as well as process extraction since their physical properties can be manipulated by small changes in pressure and temperature near the critical point of the fluid. What is a supercritical fluid? Above a certain temperature, a vapor can no longer be liquefied regardless of pressure critical temperature - Tc supercritical fluid r«gi on solid a u & temperature Fig. 1. Phase diagram depicting regions of solid, liquid, gas and supercritical fluid behavior. The critical point is defined by a critical pressure (Pc) and critical temperature (Tc) for a particular substance. Such changes can result in drastic effects on density-dependent properties such as solubility, refractive index, dielectric constant, viscosity and diffusivity of the fluid[l,2,3]. This suggests that pressure tuning of a pure supercritical fluid may be a useful means to manipulate chemical reactions on the basis of a thermodynamic solvent effect. It also means that the solvation properties of the fluid can be precisely controlled to enable selective component extraction from a matrix. In recent years there has been a growing interest in applying supercritical fluid extraction to the selective removal of trace metals from solid samples [4-10]. Much of the work has been done on simple systems comprised of inert matrices such as silica or cellulose. Recently, this process as been expanded to environmental samples as well [11,12].
[Show full text]
Physical Model for Vaporization
Physical model for vaporization Jozsef Garai Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, University Park, VH 183, Miami, FL 33199 Abstract Based on two assumptions, the surface layer is flexible, and the internal energy of the latent heat of vaporization is completely utilized by the atoms for overcoming on the surface resistance of the liquid, the enthalpy of vaporization was calculated for 45 elements. The theoretical values were tested against experiments with positive result. 1. Introduction The enthalpy of vaporization is an extremely important physical process with many applications to physics, chemistry, and biology. Thermodynamic defines the enthalpy of vaporization ()∆ v H as the energy that has to be supplied to the system in order to complete the liquid-vapor phase transformation. The energy is absorbed at constant pressure and temperature. The absorbed energy not only increases the internal energy of the system (U) but also used for the external work of the expansion (w). The enthalpy of vaporization is then ∆ v H = ∆ v U + ∆ v w (1) The work of the expansion at vaporization is ∆ vw = P ()VV − VL (2) where p is the pressure, VV is the volume of the vapor, and VL is the volume of the liquid. Several empirical and semi-empirical relationships are known for calculating the enthalpy of vaporization [1-16]. Even though there is no consensus on the exact physics, there is a general agreement that the surface energy must be an important part of the enthalpy of vaporization. The vaporization diminishes the surface energy of the liquid; thus this energy must be supplied to the system.
[Show full text]
Equation of State and Phase Transitions in the Nuclear
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics Has the rights of a manuscript Bugaev Kyrill Alekseevich UDC: 532.51; 533.77; 539.125/126; 544.586.6 Equation of State and Phase Transitions in the Nuclear and Hadronic Systems Speciality 01.04.02 - theoretical physics DISSERTATION to receive a scientific degree of the Doctor of Science in physics and mathematics arXiv:1012.3400v1 [nucl-th] 15 Dec 2010 Kiev - 2009 2 Abstract An investigation of strongly interacting matter equation of state remains one of the major tasks of modern high energy nuclear physics for almost a quarter of century. The present work is my doctor of science thesis which contains my contribution (42 works) to this field made between 1993 and 2008. Inhere I mainly discuss the common physical and mathematical features of several exactly solvable statistical models which describe the nuclear liquid-gas phase transition and the deconfinement phase transition. Luckily, in some cases it was possible to rigorously extend the solutions found in thermodynamic limit to finite volumes and to formulate the finite volume analogs of phases directly from the grand canonical partition. It turns out that finite volume (surface) of a system generates also the temporal constraints, i.e. the finite formation/decay time of possible states in this finite system. Among other results I would like to mention the calculation of upper and lower bounds for the surface entropy of physical clusters within the Hills and Dales model; evaluation of the second virial coefficient which accounts for the Lorentz contraction of the hard core repulsing potential between hadrons; inclusion of large width of heavy quark-gluon bags into statistical description.
[Show full text]
Guide to Understanding Condensation
Guide to Understanding Condensation The complete Andersen® Owner-To-Owner™ limited warranty is available at: www.andersenwindows.com. “Andersen” is a registered trademark of Andersen Corporation. All other marks where denoted are marks of Andersen Corporation. © 2007 Andersen Corporation. All rights reserved. 7/07 INTRODUCTION 2 The moisture that suddenly appears in cold weather on the interior We have created this brochure to answer questions you may have or exterior of window and patio door glass can block the view, drip about condensation, indoor humidity and exterior condensation. on the floor or freeze on the glass. It can be an annoying problem. We’ll start with the basics and offer solutions and alternatives While it may seem natural to blame the windows or doors, interior along the way. condensation is really an indication of excess humidity in the home. Exterior condensation, on the other hand, is a form of dew — the Should you run into problems or situations not covered in the glass simply provides a surface on which the moisture can condense. following pages, please contact your Andersen retailer. The important thing to realize is that if excessive humidity is Visit the Andersen website: www.andersenwindows.com causing window condensation, it may also be causing problems elsewhere in your home. Here are some other signs of excess The Andersen customer service toll-free number: 1-888-888-7020. humidity: • A “damp feeling” in the home. • Staining or discoloration of interior surfaces. • Mold or mildew on surfaces or a “musty smell.” • Warped wooden surfaces. • Cracking, peeling or blistering interior or exterior paint.
[Show full text]
Chapter 3 Bose-Einstein Condensation of an Ideal
Chapter 3 Bose-Einstein Condensation of An Ideal Gas An ideal gas consisting of non-interacting Bose particles is a ¯ctitious system since every realistic Bose gas shows some level of particle-particle interaction. Nevertheless, such a mathematical model provides the simplest example for the realization of Bose-Einstein condensation. This simple model, ¯rst studied by A. Einstein [1], correctly describes important basic properties of actual non-ideal (interacting) Bose gas. In particular, such basic concepts as BEC critical temperature Tc (or critical particle density nc), condensate fraction N0=N and the dimensionality issue will be obtained. 3.1 The ideal Bose gas in the canonical and grand canonical ensemble Suppose an ideal gas of non-interacting particles with ¯xed particle number N is trapped in a box with a volume V and at equilibrium temperature T . We assume a particle system somehow establishes an equilibrium temperature in spite of the absence of interaction. Such a system can be characterized by the thermodynamic partition function of canonical ensemble X Z = e¡¯ER ; (3.1) R where R stands for a macroscopic state of the gas and is uniquely speci¯ed by the occupa- tion number ni of each single particle state i: fn0; n1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢g. ¯ = 1=kBT is a temperature parameter. Then, the total energy of a macroscopic state R is given by only the kinetic energy: X ER = "ini; (3.2) i where "i is the eigen-energy of the single particle state i and the occupation number ni satis¯es the normalization condition X N = ni: (3.3) i 1 The probability
[Show full text]
Pressure Vs Temperature (Boiling Point)
Boiling Points and Vapor Pressure Background Boiling Points and Vapor Pressure Background: Definitions Vapor Pressure: The equilibrium pressure of a vapor above its liquid; the pressure of the vapor resulting from the evaporation of a liquid above a sample of the liquid in a closed container. Boiling Point: The temperature at which the vapor pressure of a liquid is equal to the atmospheric (or applied) pressure. As the temperature of the liquid increases, the vapor pressure will increase, as seen below: https://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/liquids/vpress.html Vapor pressure is interpreted in terms of molecules of liquid converting to the gaseous phase and escaping into the empty space above the liquid. In order for the molecules to escape, the intermolecular forces (Van der Waals, dipole- dipole, and hydrogen bonding) have to be overcome, which requires energy. This energy can come in the form of heat, aka increase in temperature. Due to this relationship between vapor pressure and temperature, the boiling point of a liquid decreases as the atmospheric pressure decreases since there is more room above the liquid for molecules to escape into at lower pressure. The graph below illustrates this relationship using common solvents and some terpenes: Pressure vs Temperature (boiling point) Ethanol Heptane Isopropyl Alcohol B-myrcene 290.0 B-caryophyllene d-Limonene Linalool Pulegone 270.0 250.0 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) a-pinene a-terpineol terpineol-4-ol 230.0 p-cymene 210.0 190.0 170.0 150.0 130.0 110.0 90.0 Temperature (˚C) Temperature 70.0 50.0 30.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 760 10.0 -10.0 -30.0 Pressure (torr) 1 Boiling Points and Vapor Pressure Background As a very general rule of thumb, the boiling point of many liquids will drop about 0.5˚C for a 10mmHg decrease in pressure when operating in the region of 760 mmHg (atmospheric pressure).
[Show full text]
It's Just a Phase!
BASIS Lesson Plan Lesson Name: It’s Just a Phase! Grade Level Connection(s) NGSS Standards: Grade 2, Physical Science FOSS CA Edition: Grade 3 Physical Science: Matter and Energy Module *Note to teachers: Detailed standards connections can be found at the end of this lesson plan. Teaser/Overview Properties of matter are illustrated through a series of demonstrations and hands-on explorations. Students will learn to identify solids, liquids, and gases. Water will be used to demonstrate the three phases. Students will learn about sublimation through a fun experiment with dry ice (solid CO2). Next, they will compare the propensity of several liquids to evaporate. Finally, they will learn about freezing and melting while making ice cream. Lesson Objectives ● Students will be able to identify the three states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) based on the relative properties of those states. ● Students will understand how to describe the transition from one phase to another (melting, freezing, evaporation, condensation, sublimation) ● Students will learn that matter can change phase when heat/energy is added or removed Vocabulary Words ● Solid: A phase of matter that is characterized by a resistance to change in shape and volume. ● Liquid: A phase of matter that is characterized by a resistance to change in volume; a liquid takes the shape of its container ● Gas: A phase of matter that can change shape and volume ● Phase change: Transformation from one phase of matter to another ● Melting: Transformation from a solid to a liquid ● Freezing: Transformation
[Show full text]
Capillary Condensation of Colloid–Polymer Mixtures Confined
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONDENSED MATTER J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) S3411–S3420 PII: S0953-8984(03)66420-9 Capillary condensation of colloid–polymer mixtures confined between parallel plates Matthias Schmidt1,Andrea Fortini and Marjolein Dijkstra Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 21 July 2003 Published 20 November 2003 Onlineatstacks.iop.org/JPhysCM/15/S3411 Abstract We investigate the fluid–fluid demixing phase transition of the Asakura–Oosawa model colloid–polymer mixture confined between two smooth parallel hard walls using density functional theory and computer simulations. Comparing fluid density profiles for statepoints away from colloidal gas–liquid coexistence yields good agreement of the theoretical results with simulation data. Theoretical and simulation results predict consistently a shift of the demixing binodal and the critical point towards higher polymer reservoir packing fraction and towards higher colloid fugacities upon decreasing the plate separation distance. This implies capillary condensation of the colloid liquid phase, which should be experimentally observable inside slitlike micropores in contact with abulkcolloidal gas. 1. Introduction Capillary condensation denotes the phenomenon that spatial confinement can stabilize a liquid phase coexisting with its vapour in bulk [1, 2]. In order for this to happen the attractive interaction between the confining walls and the fluid particles needs to be sufficiently strong. Although the main body of work on this subject has been done in the context of confined simple liquids, one might expect that capillary condensation is particularly well suited to be studied with colloidal dispersions. In these complex fluids length scales are on the micron rather than on the ångstrom¨ scale which is typical for atomicsubstances.
[Show full text]
Liquid Equilibrium Measurements in Binary Polar Systems
DIPLOMA THESIS VAPOR – LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM MEASUREMENTS IN BINARY POLAR SYSTEMS Supervisors: Univ. Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Anton Friedl Associate Prof. Epaminondas Voutsas Antonia Ilia Vienna 2016 Acknowledgements First of all I wish to thank Doctor Walter Wukovits for his guidance through the whole project, great assistance and valuable suggestions for my work. I have completed this thesis with his patience, persistence and encouragement. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Anton Friedl for giving me the opportunity to work in TU Wien and collaborate with him and his group for this project. I am thankful for his trust from the beginning until the end and his support during all this period. Also, I wish to thank for his readiness to help and support Professor Epaminondas Voutsas, who gave me the opportunity to carry out this thesis in TU Wien, and his valuable suggestions and recommendations all along the experimental work and calculations. Additionally, I would like to thank everybody at the office and laboratory at TU Wien for their comprehension and selfless help for everything I needed. Furthermore, I wish to thank Mersiha Gozid and all the students of Chemical Engineering Summer School for their contribution of data, notices, questions and solutions during my experimental work. And finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for their endless support and for the inspiration and encouragement to pursue my goals and dreams. Abstract An experimental study was conducted in order to investigate the vapor – liquid equilibrium of binary mixtures of Ethanol – Butan-2-ol, Methanol – Ethanol, Methanol – Butan-2-ol, Ethanol – Water, Methanol – Water, Acetone – Ethanol and Acetone – Butan-2-ol at ambient pressure using the dynamic apparatus Labodest VLE 602.
[Show full text]
Lecture 5 Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) Fate and Transport
Lecture 5 Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) Fate and Transport Factors affecting NAPL movement Fluid properties: Porous medium: 9 Density Permeability 9 Interfacial tension Pore size 9 Residual saturation Structure Partitioning properties Solubility Ground water: Volatility and vapor density Water content 9 Velocity Partitioning processes NAPL can partition between four phases: NAPL Gas Solid (vapor) Aqueous solution Water to gas partitioning (volatilization) Aqueous ↔ gaseous Henry’s Law (for dilute solutions) 3 Dimensionless (CG, CW in moles/m ) C G = H′ CW Dimensional (P = partial pressure in atm) P = H CW Henry’s Law Constant H has dimensions: atm m3 / mol H’ is dimensionless H’ = H/RT R = gas constant = 8.20575 x 10-5 atm m3/mol °K T = temperature in °K NAPL to gas partitioning (volatilization) NAPL ↔ gaseous Raoult’s Law: CG = Xt (P°/RT) Xt = mole fraction of compound in NAPL [-] P° = pure compound vapor pressure [atm] R = universal gas constant [m3-atm/mole/°K] T = temperature [°K] Volatility Vapor pressure P° is measure of volatility P° > 1.3 x 10-3 atm → compound is “volatile” 1.3 x 10-3 > P° > 1.3 x 10-13 atm → compound is “semi-volatile” Example: equilibrium with benzene P° = 76 mm Hg at 20°C = 0.1 atm R = 8.205 x 10-5 m3-atm/mol/°K T = 20°C (assumed) = 293°K Assume 100% benzene, mole fraction Xt = 1 3 CG = Xt P°/(RT) = 4.16 mol/m Molecular weight of benzene, C6H6 = 78 g/mol 3 3 CG = 4.16 mol/m × 78 g/mol = 324 g/m = 0.32 g/L 6 CG = 0.32 g/L x 24 L/mol / (78 g/mol) x 10 = 99,000 ppmv One mole of ideal gas = 22.4 L at STP (1 atm, 0 C), Corrected to 20 C: 293/273*22.4 = 24.0 L/mol Gas concentration in equilibrium with pure benzene NAPL Example: equilibrium with gasoline Gasoline is complex mixture – mole fraction is difficult to determine and varies Benzene = 1 to several percent (Cline et al., 1991) Based on analysis reported by Johnson et al.
[Show full text]
Lecture 11. Surface Evaporation and Soil Moisture (Garratt 5.3) in This
Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology Bretherton Lecture 11. Surface evaporation and soil moisture (Garratt 5.3) In this lecture… • Partitioning between sensible and latent heat fluxes over moist and vegetated surfaces • Vertical movement of soil moisture • Land surface models Evaporation from moist surfaces The partitioning of the surface turbulent energy flux into sensible vs. latent heat flux is very important to the boundary layer development. Over ocean, SST varies relatively slowly and bulk formulas are useful, but over land, the surface temperature and humidity depend on interactions of the BL and the surface. How, then, can the partitioning be predicted? For saturated ideal surfaces (such as saturated soil or wet vegetation), this is relatively straight- forward. Suppose that the surface temperature is T0. Then the surface mixing ratio is its saturation value q*(T0). Let z1 denote a measurement height within the surface layer (e. g. 2 m or 10 m), at which the temperature and humidity are T1 and q1. The stability is characterized by an Obhukov length L. The roughness length and thermal roughness lengths are z0 and zT. Then Monin-Obuhkov theory implies that the sensible and latent heat fluxes are HS = ρLvCHV1 (T0 - T1), HL = ρLvCHV1 (q0 - q1), where CH = fn(V1, z1, z0, zT, L)" We can eliminate T0 using a linearized version of the Clausius-Clapeyron equations: q0 - q*(T1) = (dq*/dT)R(T0 - T1), (R indicates a reference temp. near (T0 + T1)/2) HL = s*HS +!LCHV1(q*(T1) - q1), (11.1) s* = (L/cp)(dq*/dT)R (= 0.7 at 273 K, 3.3 at 300 K) This equation expresses latent heat flux in terms of sensible heat flux and the saturation deficit at the measurement level.
[Show full text]