DOCSLIB.ORG

Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Area Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Area OSCE Network of Think Tanks and Academic Institutions Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Area Innovative Approaches for Co-operation in the Conflict Zones OSCE Network of Think Tanks and Academic Institutions Working Group | Philip Remler (Principal Drafter) | Atanas Dimitrov | Samuel Goda | Konstanze Jüngling | Nino Kemoklidze | Bidzina Lebanidze | Ida Manton | Sergey Rastoltsev | Sebastian Relitz | Raymond Saner | Hans-Joachim Schmidt | Tanja Tamminen | Oleksandr Tytarchuk | Tony van der Togt | Stefan Wolff | Wolfgang Zellner This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law, where copies are made for other than private use, a fee is payable to »Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort«, Munich. Design and typesetting | red hot 'n' cool, Vienna Cover Photo © Philip Remler 2 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 6 Maps 9 1. Introduction 9 Purpose of the Project 10 Introduction to the Conflicts 15 2. Security 15 2.1 Security Aspects of the Conflicts 17 2.2 Confidence- and Security-Building Measures in the Context of the Conflicts 20 2.3 Approaches to Take 23 3. Economics 23 3.1 Economic Aspects of the Conflicts 24 3.2 The Strengths and Limitations of Trade 25 3.3 The Strengths and Limitations of Economic Assistance 27 3.4 The Strengths and Limitations of Capital Infrastructure Co-operation 30 3.5 Approaches to Take 30 3.5.1 Trade 30 3.5.2 Capital Infrastructure 33 4. Human Dimension 33 4.1 Societal Aspects of the Conflicts 34 4.2 Strengths and Limitations of Dialogue 36 4.3 Historical Narrative 37 4.4 Strengths and Limitations of Reconciliation 38 4.5 Approaches to Take 38 4.5.1 Dialogue 38 4.5.2 Historical Narrative 39 4.5.3 Reconciliation 41 5. Conclusions 42 Appendix I: Papers Received 43 Appendix II: Workshop Participants Executive Summary This project aims to provide a menu of innovative • the conflicts are not, in fact, frozen: only the ways in which the international community can peace processes are; and engage with all sides in the four so-called “frozen • the conflicts differ from one another most in conflicts” – protracted conflicts on the territory the relations between the separatists and the of the former USSR that include the Karabakh, metropolitan state from which they are trying to Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transdniestria secede. conflicts. The engagement we recommend does not impinge upon the existing participation of the The last of these characteristics helps us understand international community, and in particular the what approaches may be tried in each of the OSCE, in mediation efforts to resolve the conflicts; conflicts. The conflicts form a spectrum that cuts rather, it is available to the entire international across all the OSCE baskets: security, economics and community, not just those countries involved in the human dimension. On one end of the spectrum mediation. The aim of engagement is to improve is the Transdniestria conflict, with calm and steady the prospects for comprehensive resolution of relations between Chişinău and Tiraspol enabling the conflicts by improving security, economic, a relaxed security environment and extensive and social conditions for all populations in the economic and social interchange. At the other end conflict zones. Many efforts at such engagement is the Karabakh conflict, with a permanently tense have been attempted in the generation since the security situation and little or no economic or social conflicts began. In general, all the “low hanging contact. The South Ossetia conflict is somewhat fruit” – engagement that is relatively easy – has been more tense than the Transdniestrian, and the tried. This project of necessity looks beyond the Abkhazia conflict still more tense, but somewhat less relatively easy. so than Karabakh. Though each of the four conflicts is unique, they The project was based on reports drafted by share several basic characteristics: Network institutes. Thesecurity discussions in those papers revolved around confidence- and • they are all separatist conflicts; security-building measures. While most existing • ethnic nationalism played an important role in documents, such as the Vienna Document or the their origins; Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, • both ethnic kin and outside patrons have played apply primarily to interstate relations, at least one a major role; OSCE document, the 1993 “Stabilizing Measures • all sides believe their conflict is existential; for Localized Crisis Situations,” foresees CSBMs • all sides have been led to believe that victory between states and non-state actors without without compromise is possible; prejudice to status questions. Existing documents • all sides have adapted to the expectation that the may therefore serve as a menu from which to choose conflicts will not be resolved in the foreseeable measures tailored to the conditions of each conflict. future, and entrenched groups profit politically This was done in 2005 by Brigadier General (Ret.) and economically from the stalemate; Bernard Aussedat (France), who as Senior Military 2 Protracted Conflicts in the OSCE Area Advisor to the OSCE Mission in Moldova worked often degenerated to “ping pong”: back and forth with Russian and Ukrainian colleagues to draw up an statements defending the maximalist official views. ambitious list of CSBMs and arms control measures Opposing historical narratives have underpinned for the Transdniestria conflict. Even in this least the resentments felt between antagonistic sides: tense of the conflicts, that project was not adopted. each side has its own collection of facts, and these Each of the sides in all four conflicts has a very real – often over generations – have helped shape its psychological and political reluctance to implement psychology and actions. Discussion of historical CSBMs, and this must be overcome to provide any narrative has not been tried in these conflicts, hope of success. because there is still suspicion that the point of such discussions is to force a unified view or evaluation Discussion of economic engagement fell into of events. However, discussions have the potential three categories: trade, economic assistance, and to give each side a more complete view of how the infrastructure co-operation. Trade must be divided: other side has interpreted events, and how those there is “normal” trade, even in the informal market; interpretations have affected the other side’s actions there is also contraband. The former is a valuable over the years. Reconciliation is a frequent goal tool for maintaining mutually advantageous contacts of international engagement, as it is essential for between societies, but contraband, which capitalizes sustainable settlements. However, the sides in these on the economic distortions caused by the conflicts, conflicts currently view the term in a prosecutorial only empowers those who have a stake in the light, to punish “criminals” on the other side. True continuation of the frozen status quo. Economic reconciliation demands tolerance, which is still assistance has improved the lives of many, but while lacking on all sides of these conflicts. it has generated good will toward donors, it has rarely done so between recipients on opposing sides. Capital infrastructure co-operation, for example on the Enguri dam and power station jointly operated by the Georgian and Abkhaz authorities, has been successful in improving the lives of populations, but that has not translated into better relations in any other field. Discussion of human dimension engagement fell into three categories: dialogue, historical narrative, and reconciliation. Bilateral Track-2 dialogue has been tried many times, with modest success: a proportion of the participants on one side may come to “humanize” their conceptions of a few participants on the other. Bilateral Track-2 dialogue has not, however, led participants or the societies as a whole to lessen their existential fears that the enemy’s society aims to destroy theirs. Bilateral dialogue has 3 Key Recommendations Security For all conflicts, the task of developing effective • We recommend that the OSCE might most Confidence- and Security-Building Measures consists efficiently carry out its monitoring by creating of inducing the sides to overcome their reflexive a special monitoring unit based in Vienna that aversion to CSBMs; structuring mechanisms, could regularly monitor all the conflicts. The acceptable to all sides, for implementing CSBMs; current High Level Planning Group could take on and choosing individual CSBMs that will make real a second hat to serve as the core and repository of improvements in security. expertise for such a monitoring body. Overcoming resistance to CSBMS: • We recommend drafting a specific document • For the Karabakh conflict, in which the sides containing a menu of CSBMs, with the OSCE have repeatedly rejected calls for CSBMs, we as the repository. The sides in any particular recommend renewed diplomatic pressure focusing conflict could unilaterally – but in an agreed, on the safety and welfare of civilian populations synchronized way – notify the repository that vulnerably close to the line of contact. they pledge to implement specific measures within the menu, and request the OSCE to • For Abkhazia and South
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/27/2021 10:36:55AM Via Free Access
    security and human rights 27 (2016) 273-288 brill.com/shrs osce Mediation in an Eroding International Order Philip Remler retired u.s. diplomat Abstract The feeling is widespread in the West that the post wwii normative international or- der has been under severe challenge since Russia’s seizure of Crimea, now exacerbated by statements from the American president casting doubt on the institutions that un- derpin that order. Is there a future role for osce mediation as this order erodes? Study of the Ukraine crisis in light of other protracted conflicts on the territory of the former Soviet Union shows that the same challenges have existed for a generation. Because the conflicts were small, however, the international community chose to accept a fic- tion of convenience to isolate them from an otherwise functioning international order: the narrative that the separatists sought independence, not (as in reality) a re-drawing of post-Soviet borders. This isolation is under pressure both from the new experience in Ukraine and from the extension of ever-greater Russian control over the separatists, amounting to crypto-annexation, despite a backlash from Moscow’s clients, including in Armenia. There is little likelihood of a resolution to the Ukraine crisis, including Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and prospects for mediation to resolve the conflicts remain dim. However, continued talks may resolve some humanitarian issues and pro- vide a release valve to prevent pressures boiling over into renewed open warfare. In 2015 the present author published an article outlining some effects of the Ukraine crisis on protracted conflicts in the osce area and on osce mediation in those conflicts.1 He has been asked to revisit his assessment of that time in * Philip Remler is a retired u.s.
    [Show full text]
  • Toplanti 24 Yeni Layout 1
    AVİM Conference Book 24 THE CENTENNIAL OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE THREE SOUTH CAUCASUS STATES: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY Proceedings of the International Conference Organized by Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) in Turkey on 9 November 2018 Türkmeneli İşbirliği ve Kültür Vakfı AVRASYA İNCELEMELERİ MERKEZİ CENTER FOR EURASIAN STUDIES The Centennial of the Independence of the Three South Caucasus States: Historical Background, Contemporary Developments and Prospects of Peace and Prosperity International Conference AVİM (Center for Eurasian Studies) Conference Book No: 24 October 2019 Ankara AVİM CONFERENCE BOOK No: 24 EDITOR Tutku Dilaver Nigar Shiralizade REDACTION Mehmet Oğuzhan Tulun TRANSCRIPTION Alperen Ünlü DESIGN Ruhi Alagöz PUBLICATION DATE October 2019 PRINTING Özyurt Matbaacılık Saray Mahallesi 123. Cadde Kahramankazan / ANKARA Tel: 0 312 384 15 36 - Faks: 0 312 384 15 37 Statements of facts, or opinions appearing in this book are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by the editor or publisher. Copyright © AVİM (Center for Eurasian Studies) 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the Publishers. To get your own copy of this or any of AVİM publications please visit http://www.avim.org.tr/ CONTENTS Contributors .....................................................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Philip Remler (MUO0007) I Can Only
    Written evidence submitted by Philip Remler (MUO0007) SCOPE I can only provide information with regard to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and only with regard to the times I was seconded to OSCE field operations or otherwise interacted as part of the OSCE. These have been three: April 1995-August 1995 Political officer seconded to the first cohort of the OSCE Assistant Group in Chechnya during a period of active armed hostilities, seeking a peaceful resolution to the Chechnya conflict in the Russian Federation and dealing with humanitarian and human rights issues. 1996-1998 Deputy in the U.S. Department of State office of the special negotiator for conflict resolution in the Newly Independent States (of the former Soviet Union), working as part of the OSCE Minsk Group and, from 1997, as part of the U.S. co-chair as the Minsk Group attempted to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the Karabakh conflict. I had previously participated in Minsk Group negotiations in Geneva in 1993, based on my position then as political officer in the U.S. Embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan. December 2007-January 2012 Head of Mission seconded to the OSCE Mission in Moldova, dealing with all issues, including efforts to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the Transdniestria conflict. As is evident, the experience is largely in conflict resolution, and exclusively in field operations and the sui generis Minsk Group. I have no special expertise with regard to institutions such as the OSCE Secretariat, Permanent Council, the Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the OSCE High Commissioner for National Minorities, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, or other affiliated institutions, though I interacted with them frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Strategic Perspectives
    HIGHLIGHT OF JOURNAL The role of ideology in mass atrocities: The case of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan Vugar Gurbanov CAUCASUS STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES Volume 1 • Issue 2 • Winter 2020 Armenia and Azerbaijan: CAUCASUS Between Failed Peace and War STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES - ARTICLES COMMENTARIES Geopolitics and the Second Karabakh War The Gordian Knot of the Armenia–Azerbaijan Damjan Krnjevic Miskovic Conflict and the Second Karabakh War: Conclusions and Reflections Western Blind Spot in the South Caucasus: Esmira Jafarova Chronicle of a War Foretold Robert M. Cutler Turkey’s Presence, Involvement and Engagement in the Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict: A Reflection on Volume 1 • Issue 2 Winter 2020 Economic Potential of the Liberated Azerbaijani–Turkish Relations Territories of Azerbaijan: A Brief Overview Ayça Ergun Rovshan Ibrahimov Violations of International Humanitarian Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict: Law by Armenia in the Second Karabakh war The Failure of Multilateral Diplomacy Nizami Safarov and Najiba Mustafayeva Murad Muradov Ukrainian Discourse on the Assessing Damage Caused by Illegal Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict Activities of Armenia to Azerbaijan in the Liberated Anna Korzeniowska-Bihun (Formerly Occupied) Territories Javid Alyarli and Arzu Abbasova International Response to the Second Karabakh War Nina Miholjcic BOOK REVIEW SERIES: Exculpation of Armenian terrorism under guise of the ‘Armenian martyr’ reviewed by Murad Muradov Sama Baghirova “The Light that Failed: A Reckoning” (authored by Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes) JOURNALISTIC DISPATCH * reviewed by Mahammad Mammadov Dispatch from the Conflict Zone during “The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Azerbaijan’s Patriotic War Rules the World” (authored by Anu Bradford) Elmira Musazadeh Volume 1 • Issue 2 • Winter 2020 Armenia and Azerbaijan: Between Failed Peace and War CAUCASUS STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • News from Copenhagen 286.Indd
    News from Copenhagen Number 286 Current Information from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 11 February 2009 President Soares leads OSCE PA visit to Moldova Chisinau, including Eugeniu Stirbu, Chairman of the Central Electoral Commission, and representatives of political parties and civil society. In Tiraspol, the delegation met with, among others, the Chairman of the Transnistrian Supreme Soviet, Evgeny Shevchuk, and the deputy Transnistrian leader, Aleksander Korolev The visit provides an opportunity for the OSCE PA to prepare its observation mission to the upcoming 5 April parliamentary elections in Moldova. The delegation underlined the importance of an open and transparent electoral process. The visit is also aimed at enhancing Assembly work in Moldova, including through the Ad Hoc Parliamentary Team on Moldova, which has worked to promote dialogue between parties and organizations representing different sections of President Soares meets CEC Chairman Eugeniu Stirbu the Moldovan population. Resolving the status of Transnistria has been a particular priority of the Parliamentary Team. OSCE PA President Joao Soares is on an offi cial visit The visit was organized with the support of the Parliament to Moldova from 9 to 12 February, holding high-level of Moldova and the OSCE Mission to Moldova. The government and parliamentary meetings in both Chisinau delegation is working closely with the OSCE Mission, and Tiraspol. The OSCE PA delegation includes Pierluigi headed by Ambassador Philip Remler. Mantini, Italy, Canan Kalsin, Turkey, and Secretary General The OSCE PA delegation is supported by Programme Spencer Oliver. Offi cer Anna Chernova and Presidential Advisor Andreas The delegation met with Marian Lupu, the Speaker Baker from the International Secretariat, and by Nuno of Parliament; Grigore Petrenco, head of the Moldovan Paixao and Giuseppe Maggio from the Portuguese and Delegation to the OSCE PA; senior government offi cials in Italian Parliaments, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine, Protracted Conflicts and the Osce
    security and human rights 26 (2015) 88-106 brill.com/shrs Ukraine, Protracted Conflicts and the osce Philip Remler Non-resident program manager at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [email protected] Abstract Aspects of the Ukraine crisis present enormous problems for the future of osce and other international conflict mediation. Annexation, “hybrid” warfare, the proliferation of non-recognized separatist polities, the absence of a shared baseline of facts and, therefore, the sharp divergence of narratives, and perhaps most of all, the develop- ment of fortress mentalities – all of these have challenged the “Helsinki acquis” on which the osce is based. Developments in the protracted conflicts – greater Russian control over three of the separatist polities to the point of crypto-annexation and the spread of the idea that democracy and human rights are no more than tools of Western imperialist domination – affect the way in which the osce and its mediators are per- ceived. The cycle of Russian assertiveness and Western response has created a self- reinforcing spiral that consolidates alliances among those who share a fortress mentality, is used to justify past actions, discourages “weakness” in the face of pressure, and encourages ever more aggressive responses to it. In the face of this discouraging picture, osce mediators should build on the remaining areas of co-operation – espe- cially on the Karabakh conflict – and emphasize osce impartiality. The osce has always been a “big tent,” a forum of diverse equals, none of whom has a perfect record on democracy and human rights. Criticizing and being criticized is not, therefore, a “double standard,” but a dialogue that enriches all participating States.
    [Show full text]
  • OSCE Insights Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH), Centre for OSCE Research (CORE)
    2020 | 06 OSCE Insights Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH), Centre for OSCE Research (CORE) Philip Remler | Richard Giragosian Marina Lorenzini | Sergei Rastoltsev OSCE Minsk Group: Lessons from the Past and Tasks for the Future DOI: 10.5771/9783748922339-06 https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748922339-06, am 29.12.2020, 18:09:22 Open Access - https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/agb OSCE Minsk Group: Lessons from the Past and Tasks for the Future Philip Remler, Richard Giragosian, Marina Lorenzini, Sergei Rastoltsev* Abstract The international community, acting through the OSCE Minsk Group, has been unable to induce the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to resolve the Karabakh conflict, which began in 1988 and burst into a new round of fighting in September 2020. Leaders and populations on both sides had become increasingly maximalist; any leader willing to compromise could be branded a traitor. The 2020 fighting drastically changed facts on the ground. With Turkey’s assistance, Azerbaijan recovered much of the land it lost a generation previously. But Azerbaijan was compelled to permit Russia to deploy a large peacekeeping force, something it had resisted for 25 years. While its authority is diminished, the Minsk Group can play a role going forward in restoring confidence and communication between the sides, opening borders, and ultimately leading negotiations on the future status of the region. Keywords Karabakh, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia, Turkey, OSCE To cite this publication: Philip Remler, Richard Giragosian, Marina Lorenzini, Sergei Rastoltsev, OSCE Minsk Group: Lessons from the Past and Tasks for the Future, OSCE Insights 6 (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020), at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748922339-06 Introduction1 over thirty years the Karabakh conflict has defied efforts to find a solution.2 The fighting that engulfed Azerbaijan Since 1992 the Minsk Group of the OSCE and Armenia on 27 September 2020 re- has been the international body officially minded the world – yet again – that for mandated to mediate.
    [Show full text]
  • Chained to the Caucasus: Peacemaking in Karabakh, 1987–2012
    Chained to the Caucasus: Peacemaking in Karabakh, 1987–2012 Philip Remler Chained to the Caucasus: Peacemaking in Karabakh, 1987–2012 Philip Remler International Peace Institute, 777 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017 www.ipinst.org © 2016 by International Peace Institute All rights reserved. Published 2016. About the Author: Philip Remler is a retired US diplomat who served with the US Department of State and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). His overseas posts included Ankara, Baku, Chi in u, Groznyy, Iraqi Kurdist an, Moscow, and Tbilisi. In addition to hisş extendedă involvement with the Karabakh conflict and with OSCE-led efforts to mediate it, he reported on and/or participated in peace negotiations on the Abkhazia, Chechnya, South Ossetia, and Transdniestria conflicts. Cover Photo: Armenian and Karabakh armed forces hold joint military exercises at a training ground near the town of Tigranakert in Karabakh, November 14, 2014. Getty Images/Karen Minasyan. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author and not necessarily those of the International Peace Institute (IPI). IPI welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of a well-informed debate on critical policies and issues in international affairs. IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many generous donors, whose contributions make publications like this one possible. In particular, IPI would like to thank the government of Switzerland. ISBN: 0-937722-81-2 ISBN-13: 978-0-937722-81-7 CONTENTS Foreword . v Acknowledgements . vii Acronyms . viii Introduction. 1 1. The Social and Political Origins of the Karabakh Conflict .
    [Show full text]
  • Osce Mediation in an Eroding International Order
    security and human rights 27 (2016) 273-288 brill.com/shrs osce Mediation in an Eroding International Order Philip Remler retired u.s. diplomat Abstract The feeling is widespread in the West that the post wwii normative international or- der has been under severe challenge since Russia’s seizure of Crimea, now exacerbated by statements from the American president casting doubt on the institutions that un- derpin that order. Is there a future role for osce mediation as this order erodes? Study of the Ukraine crisis in light of other protracted conflicts on the territory of the former Soviet Union shows that the same challenges have existed for a generation. Because the conflicts were small, however, the international community chose to accept a fic- tion of convenience to isolate them from an otherwise functioning international order: the narrative that the separatists sought independence, not (as in reality) a re-drawing of post-Soviet borders. This isolation is under pressure both from the new experience in Ukraine and from the extension of ever-greater Russian control over the separatists, amounting to crypto-annexation, despite a backlash from Moscow’s clients, including in Armenia. There is little likelihood of a resolution to the Ukraine crisis, including Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and prospects for mediation to resolve the conflicts remain dim. However, continued talks may resolve some humanitarian issues and pro- vide a release valve to prevent pressures boiling over into renewed open warfare. In 2015 the present author published an article outlining some effects of the Ukraine crisis on protracted conflicts in the osce area and on osce mediation in those conflicts.1 He has been asked to revisit his assessment of that time in * Philip Remler is a retired u.s.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Pankisi Gorge: an Ethnographic Survey
    University of California, Berkeley Georgias Pankisi Gorge: An Ethnographic Survey Shorena Kurtsikidze and Vakhtang Chikovani Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ Georgias Pankisi Gorge: An Ethnographic Survey Shorena Kurtsikidze and Vakhtang Chikovani Spring 2002 Shorena Kurtsikidze is a Research Associate with the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies at UC Berkeley. She has a Ph.D. in Cultural Anthropology from the Institute of History and Ethnology, Tbilisi, Academy of Sciences of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2016 Hurford Next Generation Fellowship Research Papers
    THE HURFORD FOUNDATION 2015-2016 HURFORD NEXT GENERATION FELLOWSHIP RESEARCH PAPERS No. 7 Preventing Escalation in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Threats to Euro-Atlantic Security and Opportunities for Euro-Atlantic Cooperation Mikayel Zolyan EASI-Hurford Next Generation Fellow The Hurford Fellows Program is sponsored by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and is made possible by a generous grant from the Hurford Foundation THE HURFORD FOUNDATION The Hurford Fellowships, administered by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, support the Euro- Atlantic Security Initiative (EASI) Next Generation Network in identifying young academics conducting innovative research on international security in the Euro- Atlantic area. 2 Not Another Proxy War 1 When in April 2016 hostilities broke out in Nagorno-Karabakh some accounts in international media presented this conflict as another episode in the global confrontation between Russia and the West. It is not surprising that some saw it as another one among the so-called “frozen” or “protracted” conflicts on the periphery of Russia, which pit de facto states supported by Russia against post-Soviet republics friendly with the West. It is true that the conflict in Nagorno- Karabakh has many similarities to the other post-Soviet protracted conflicts in Transnistria, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. However, the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh has important differences from these conflicts in several respects, and one of the most striking is the position of Russia and the West. Not only have both Russia and the West refrained from decisive support to either side, but they have cooperated for decades in the efforts to find a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Osce and the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process
    security and human rights 27 (2016) 422-441 brill.com/shrs osce and the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process Carey Cavanaugh us Ambassador (retired); Professor of Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution, University of Kentucky’s Patterson School; Executive-in-Residence, Geneva Centre for Security Policy Abstract The Minsk Process for Nagorno-Karabakh has directed unprecedented engagement from key world powers on this decades-old dispute. osce’s first peacemaking effort survived a rocky start, evolving into a functional multi-faceted conflict management instrument. While the envisioned “Minsk Conference” was never held, not one of the myriad peace proposals adopted, no status determination for Nagorno-Karabakh ever made, and no refugees or lands returned, the Minsk Process may still be considered a success. Frequent criticism notwithstanding, it has kept Armenia and Azerbaijan engaged in a near continuous diplomatic dialogue, restrained large-scale fighting, and belied fears of a significant regional conflagration. That is a noteworthy achievement. Keywords osce – Nagorno-Karabakh – conflict – mediation – Minsk Group – Armenia – Azerbaijan osce and the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process Context On the tenth day of his presidency George W. Bush received a telephone call from French President Jacques Chirac to convey congratulations and to brief him on an important topic: Nagorno-Karabakh. Chirac had already coordinated with Russian President Vladimir Putin on this dispute a week before Bush * From 1999–2001, Carey Cavanaugh was the us Special Negotiator for Eurasian Conflicts and osce Minsk Group Co-Chair, and led the Key West Peace Talks on Nagorno-Karabakh. © nhc, 2017 | doi 10.1163/18750230-02703001 Downloaded from Brill.com10/03/2021 12:06:38AM via free access <UN> Osce And The Nagorno-karabakh Peace Process 423 formally took office.
    [Show full text]