DOCSLIB.ORG

Letter to David Cameron MP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letter to David Cameron MP Leader of the Council The Courts English Street CARLISLE Cumbria CA3 8NA Fax 01228 607403 Tel 01228 227394 Email [email protected] Our Ref: ETM/KCS Date: 5th October 2010 The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Prime Minister House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Dear As the Conservative Leader of Cumbria County Council, I appreciate and endorse the actions that the coalition government must take to reduce the national deficit. It is also entirely apposite to undertake a comprehensive defence review and that you consider such matters in the light of the overall UK budget and the UK’s defence commitments both at home and abroad. I am also aware that you appreciate how important both submarine and surface vessel building is to Barrow, to south Cumbria and, indeed, to the defence of the nation. County Councillors from across Cumbria, and of all political persuasions, have unanimously agreed to give full support to plans to secure a prosperous future for Barrow and the Furness area. Barrow has suffered in the past because of its comparative isolation. It is ironic, perhaps, that cutting-edge manufacturing and the latest forms of energy are underpinning the modest turnaround in the area’s fortunes; this marks Barrow out from other regenerating towns that have relied on financial services and the retail sector to underpin their economies. Barrow shipyard is one of the largest in the United Kingdom (having constructed well over 800 vessels in its history). The port of Barrow itself is heavily involved with the transportation of natural gases and other forms of energy from local sites such as Sellafield, Barrow Offshore Windfarm, Ormonde Wind Farm, Rampside Gas Terminal and Roosecote Power Station. Barrow is also becoming increasingly popular as a port of call for cruise liners visiting south west Cumbria and the Lake District. With government support, there is no doubt that the Furness area has done remarkably well for itself in recent years; yet parts of the town remain among the most deprived in England. Barrow has carved out an important niche for itself. Currently, over 5,000 highly skilled people are based at the Barrow shipyard delivering a unique manufacturing and design capability that enables the UK to lead Europe in warship construction and submarine build. It is the workforce in the shipyard and the way the employees have readily adopted new production techniques, plus the leadership in the yard in securing a first-class senior management team and the cooperation of the unions, that has contributed most to Building pride in Cumbria Barrow’s well-earned reputation for quality and reliability. It is a workforce of which we can be justifiably proud. I must stress, therefore, the importance of sustaining and retaining the skills and capacity inherent in the NW’s naval shipbuilding industry especially in the Barrow and Furness areas. Any Strategic Defence Security Review (SDSR) must recognise, I suggest, that the strength of the nation’s defence industrial base and the skills within it are as important as the armed forces in the protection of our national security. Unless there is a considered and strategic approach to defence procurement, that industrial base is likely to be lost and it would take many years to reclaim it. My council has adopted a major and ambitious aim, namely: the minimisation of: • financial poverty, the poverty of ambition, and the poverty of opportunity. In tackling the socioeconomic problems we must give people hope and stimulate aspirations. I know it is understood that the defence industry provides high levels of employment in some of the less well-off parts of the United Kingdom. Parts of Cumbria, particularly in Barrow in Furness, are very dependent on the defence industry and the spending on defence procurement is a key means of increasing wealth and stimulating further wealth creation in such economically remote areas. The National Audit Office has previously highlighted that: • “the time delay between the construction of the Vanguard Class submarines and the beginning of the Astute programme meant that key skills and submarine building had been lost.” This also had a significant impact on the local economy and is one of the main reasons why Barrow has the third highest percentage of people claiming incapacity benefit in the country. It is recognised that the every job in the defence industry supports 1.6 jobs elsewhere in the supply chain and within the economy. I am sure it is also recognised that investment in defence can stimulate economic recovery and, of course, contribute to the coalition government’s policies for a business-led approach to economic regeneration. Much of the County and District Council’s regeneration activity in the Barrow area in recent years has been deployed to address the impact of reductions in the workforce at the BAe System’s Yard due to an inconsistent government approach to submarine procurement. I believe that there must be a rational and long term strategy for defence procurement that recognises the capacity within the UK’s defence industrial base, not least, that within the Barrow shipyard. This will guarantee that the critical skills, and the opportunities for much- needed apprenticeships, are not lost. It will further ensure that areas such as Barrow in Furness, where economies are so dependent on the defence industry, do not require huge levels of investment and national assistance in order to mitigate the impacts of job losses and the increased effects of worklessness with many or all of the attendant socioeconomic difficulties which would ensue. In short, we have inherent in Barrow and Cumbria the skills, the capacity and the capability to continue to make a significant contribution to the United Kingdom’s maritime defence strategy as we have done since the 1890s. It would be little short of a tragedy if such competence and resources were to be underutilised. I must urge you to ensure that the potential of the Barrow shipyard is both recognised and exploited in the current determination of the Defence Strategic Review. Yours sincerely, Eddie Martin The Leader Cumbria County Council C.c. The Rt Hon Liam Fox MP, Secretary of State for Defence Peter Luff MP, Minister for Defence, Equipment, Support and Technology Lord Astor, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Ministry of Defence) The Rt. Hon Vince Cable MP, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills John Woodcock MP, Barrow Dick Oliver, Chairman BAe Ian King, Chief Executive BAe Tom Campbell, Chief Executive Barrow Borough Council Jack Richardson, Leader, Barrow Borough Council Terry Waiting, Chairman Keep our Future Afloat Enc. Keep our Future Afloat Brochure .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 01 STA Cover 2007
    15-28 STA Listings 2007 21/2/07 2:37 PM Page 15 THE SOURCE TESTING ASSOCIATION THE STA MEMBERSHIP 3M UK Aerosol Industrial Station Road, Coleshill ALcontrol On-Site Services Ian Clarkson Research Group Birmingham B46 1JY Trevor Worrall 3M Centre, Cain Road, Bracknell Cristina Gutiérrez-Cañas T: 0800 917 1313 Templeborough House, Mill Close Berkshire RG12 8HT Maria Diaz de Haro 68 F: 01675 467022 Rotherham, South Yorkshire T: 01344 857801 Bajo Pab 3-4-5, Portugalete [email protected] S60 1BZ [email protected] Bizakaia 48920, Spain www.uk.airliquide.com T: 01709 841028 www.mmm.com T: (+34) 944 723597 F: 01709 841079 F: (+34) 944 723604 Air Monitors [email protected] A-Plus Consulting [email protected] James Mills www.alcontrol.co.uk Graham Clarke www.aerosolirg.com Unit 2, The Hawthorns 35 Holmesdale Road, Dronfield Pillows Green Road, Staunton Derbyshire S18 2FA AES Gloucestershire GL19 3NY T: 01246 410256 Mark Elliott T: 01452 849111 [email protected] Northumberland Dock Road F: 01452 849112 Wallsend, Tyne & Wear NE28 0QD [email protected] T: 0191 2968500 www.airmonitors.co.uk Anchem Laboratories F: 0191 2968560 Gethyn Jones [email protected] Air Products Unit 5a, Darcy Business Park www.aes-labs.co.uk Dr Gary Yates Darcy Way, Llandarcy, Neath 2 Millennium Gate, Westmere Drive SA10 6EJ ABB AES Kilroot Power Crewe, Cheshire CW1 6AP T: 01792 323223 John Kelly Stephen Fleming T: 01270 614227 F: 01792 323236 Hortonwood 37, Telford, Shropshire Larne Road, Carrickfergus F: 01932 258622 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • River Frontage
    PORT OF BARROW-IN-FURNESS Site: Site size (Available land area etc): • South Side of Ramsden Dock = Lay down and storage area of 18 – 20 acres • North Side of Anchor Line Basin = Lay down and storage area of 10 – 12 acres • Additional land adjacent to Port Estate available Details of wet and dry dock facilities/ river frontage/ site quayside accessibility: • Approx 500m of general quay frontage • A further 500m (approx) of quay frontage with heavy lift capability • BAE Systems Shipbuilding Facility partly located within port estate. Buildings and warehousing: • 6000m2 warehouse on site • Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate offers opportunities for new buildings and warehouse facility. Maximum Vessel capacity (length, width, draught (m)): • Length = up to 200 metres (subject to certain criteria for vessels over 170m LOA) • Beam = Dock entrance width = 36 metres • Draught = variable but typically up to 8 metres or more • No.1 Dock Gate opens 2.5 hours before high water, closes at high water or shortly after. Nearby industrial sites (approx. distance from port) vacant or otherwise: • Vacant Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate = approx 40 acres Location, Transport and Connections - Location i.e. nearest cities/industrial areas: • Barrow-in-Furness Town Centre = 1.5km away from the port • Lancaster = 75km • Preston = 108km • Manchester = 160km Major road, rail, water and air transport links: • A590 – From Barrow = 50km to M6 Motorway • Rail – Dock rail link to Furness Line which is connected to West Coast main Line
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008
    2008 Corporate responsibility report Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Contents 3 Chief Executive’s introduction 4 Assurance and scope 5 Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement 6 2008 Highlights 7 Business overview 8 Our approach 14 CR Committee and Governance 17 Business principles 22 Key Performance Indicators 25 Key impact areas 26 Climate change and the environment 44 Customer service 56 Securing future energy supplies 64 Health and safety 72 Employees 83 Supply chain 87 Local impact 92 Our stakeholders 94 Customers 97 Investors 99 Employees 101 Suppliers and business partners 103 Governments and regulators 105 Communities 107 NGOs and consumer organisations 109 Media 110 Trade unions 111 Appendix – Memberships 2 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Chief Executive’s introduction Introduction from Sam Laidlaw 2008 was my first full year as a member of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Throughout the year, the Committee challenged our current performance and debated areas of future activity across a range of critical business issues. Through this continual process of improvement, I have confidence that we are making good progress in developing the necessary structures and processes, allied to a management commitment that will build a sustainable and environmentally aware business for the future. In this report, you can read about our initiatives and performance over the year, as well as our forward- looking plans for 2009 and beyond. As our CR programmes mature, there is an increasing amount of available information to present to our internal and external audiences. As in previous years, we have chosen to use the online environment to report.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Response to the North West Coast Connections Route Corridor Consultation – Appendix 1
    PROPOSED RESPONSE TO THE NORTH WEST COAST CONNECTIONS ROUTE CORRIDOR CONSULTATION – APPENDIX 1 PURPOSE OF APPENDIX The purpose of this Appendix is to set out the proposed response of SLDC to the National Grid North West Coast Connections Route Corridor Consultation 1 General comments 1.1 SLDC broadly supports the preferred option – Onshore South with Tunnel. 1.2 The preferred option includes a tunnel under Morecambe Bay from close to Heysham to the Rampside area and then broadly follows the existing 132kV Electricity North West power line northwards through the Furness peninsula to Broughton in Furness and then up the West Coast of Cumbria, much of which will be removed and replaced by a smaller number of larger 400kV pylons. 1.3 The preferred option, in the main, avoids the significant impacts to South Lakeland communities that would be incurred if other alternative options, such as Onshore South, were implemented. 1.4 However, SLDC’s support for the preferred option is subject to consideration of the remaining concerns and needs for mitigation detailed below. 2 Section H1 (South eastern Furness) 2.1 The preferred tunnel route is proposed to surface slightly inland in the area between Roosebeck and Rampside. SLDC considers that locating the convertor stations at the points where the cable surfaces as close to the existing energy infrastructure at Roosecote Power Station as possible (as indicated by the larger blue hatched polygon in the consultation material) would indeed be preferable. It would have the least impact on social, environmental and economic factors, including landscape, impacts on local communities and tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosecote (Barrow)
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE 02 October 2012 A Report by the Assistant Director Planning and Sustainability _____________________________________________________________________________ Reference No: EN010044 Applicant: Centrica RPS Limited, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5GB District: Barrow Borough Council ______________________________________________________________________ Proposal: To consider a joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council Local Impact Report relating to an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to enable the applicant to construct and operate a new Biomass electricity generating station with a nominal capacity of 90MW, together with a number of associated developments Location: Land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness ______________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 To approve the joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council prepared Local Impact Report, as set out in Annex A, and to refer it to Cabinet and for Cabinet to make representation about whether the Council supports the proposal or not, taking account the Local Impact Report agreed by DC&R. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On the 3 rd July 2012, Centrica RPS Limited submitted an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate) to build and operate a 90MW (gross)/80MW (Net) biomass electricity generating power station on land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness. 2.2 As the biomass facility is an on-shore electricity generating station having a capacity of more than 50MW, it is deemed a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) within the definition contained in Sections 14 & 15 of the Planning Act 2008, as amended. The application for the DCO will therefore be determined by the Secretary of State, via the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate).
    [Show full text]
  • Ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST of PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES by WIRELESS
    — l i ­ ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST OF PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES BY WIRELESS Nom du Port* — Cir­ Adresse télégraphique de Détails sur la Station de Noms et adresses des Agents Renseigne­ conscription adminis­ l'Autorité saintoire du Port réception des messages habilités pour recevoir et trans­ m ents com­ trative (entre paren­ et Indicatif d'appel* mettre les messages plementaires thèses) voir page. [Réponse à Question Sjf [Réponse à Question 3]t [Réponse à Question 3 ] t [Réponse à Question 4]t Name of Port* — Admi­ Telegraphic Address of Port Particulars of receiving Names and addresses of approved Supplemen­ nistrative Local Area Health Authority Station accepting messa­ Agents for receiving and trans­ tary Infor­ (between bracketsJ ges and signal call • mitting messages mation [Reply to Question. 2] t [Reply to Question a] T [Reply to Question 4 ]t see p age' [Reply to Question 311 1 * o 3 * 4 5 AFRIQUE — AFRICA AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE FRANÇAISE — FRENCH WEST AFRICA Dakar I A g e n t p r i n c i p a l S a n t é I Dakar côtier I Aucun (None) 23 I D a k a r 1 | CONGO BELGE — BELGIAN CONGO Banana j S a n i p o r t B a n a n a j — j Aucun (None) 23 CÔTE FRANÇAISE DES SOMALIS — FRENCH SOMALILAND Djibouti I S e r v i c e quarantenaire I — I Aucun (None) 24 D j i b o u t i | I ILE MAURICE — MAURITIUS Port Louis P o r t H e a l t h O f f i c e r 1 — 1 None (Aucun) 24 P o r t L o u i s | I RÉUNION Port des Galets S x n té m a r it im e I Saint-Denis I Aucun (None) 25 P o r t d e s G a l e t s | Reunion | SIERRA LEONE Freetown H e a l t h F r e e t o w n Freetown None (Aucun) 25 Cable and Wireless Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosecote Biomass Report PDF 177 KB
    PART I South Lakeland District Council PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: 25 October 2012 Report Author: Mark Shipman (Development Management Group Manager) Eleanor Huddleston, Planning and Enforcement Assistant Portfolio: Jonathon Brook (Housing and Development Portfolio Holder) Report from: David Sykes (Director People and Places) Wards affected: All in the Furness Peninsula Key Decision: Not applicable A REPORT ON THE SUBMISSION OF A LOCAL IMPACT REPORT TO THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DIVISION REGARDING ROOSECOTE BIOMASS POWER STATION AT BARROW IN FURNESS 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 This report is presented to inform Members about the draft Local Impact Report to be submitted to the National Infrastructure Division of the Planning Inspectorate (NID) and allow Members to comment thereon. 1.2 Appendix 1 contains the Draft Report. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 It is recommended that Members of Planning Committee:- (1) Consider the report and suggest any revisions they wish to be incorporated; and (2) Endorse the report for submission to the NID. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 The application seeks a Development Consent Order (DCO) to construct and operate a 90MW (gross) / 80MW (Net) biomass electricity generating power station on land at Roosecote, Barrow in Furness. 3.2 The main structures proposed comprise: a boiler house 70m high; a stack 90m high; a fuel storage shed 29m high, up to 120m x 55m in plan; four fuel storage silos for wood pellets each 25m in diameter and 35m tall; biomass screening building; road delivery unloading facility; rail unloading facility; a railway line connecting the existing rail infrastructure; and conveyors to transport fuel within the power station.
    [Show full text]
  • New Chief of Defence Materiel Makes Offer to DE&S
    Feb 11 Issue 33 desthe magazine for defenceider equipment and support New Chief of Defence Materiel makes offer to DE&S Bernard Gray’s message to DE&S staff See inside Technology Ambush hits Extension All-round Cutting edge on display the water of support vision engineering NEWS 4 5 Osprey is the star again DE&S staff have welcomed news that a soldier in Afghanistan has twice survived insurgents’ bullets thanks to the life-saving Osprey body armour. 6 Rivet Joint progresses The first of three aircraft in the Airseeker project, the US RC-135 Rivet Joint, has arrived in Texas for conversion to an RAF aircraft. 8 A clearer front line vision A programme to deliver thousands of world-beating 2011 night vision systems to the front line has been completed in short time by a DE&S team. feb Picture: Andrew Linnett 10 Chinook passes first flight test Flight testing of the first Chinook Mk4 aircraft for the RAF has taken place, another step in a project to deliver an essentially new aircraft into service. 12 Bridging the gap Soldiers on operations can now cross obstacles thanks to a portable bridging system which has been procured by DE&S. 13 Focus on base security Extra surveillance has been provided to forward bases in Afghanistan with new tripod-mounted short-range cameras. cover image 14 ‘Troops want for nothing’ Soldiers in Afghanistan ‘want for nothing’ and Bernard Gray has addressed staff in town hall sessions at Abbey Wood after taking over as Chief of Defence Materiel last have ‘the very best’ equipment, according to the month.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador's Activities
    Ambassador’s Activities Distributor: French Embassy in the UK - Press and Communications Services - 58 Knightsbridge, SW1X 7JT London 2012 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.ambafrance-uk.org Speech by HE Bernard Emié, French Ambassador to the United Kingdom at the FRUK Defence Forum Roundtable London, 19 Septembre 2012 www.ambafrance-uk.org It’s not easy to be invited at a week’s notice to close a conference we haven’t attended, in the presence of so many experts! But let’s get back to the basics of our strategic defence relations, which remain an absolute priority for the French authorities that emerged from the elections of May and June 2012. I/ The solidity of Franco-British defence cooperation I’d like, first of all, to recall a few simple and basic facts about Franco-British defence cooperation. It’s a solid partnership rooted in a shared vision of the great defence and security challenges. It’s a partnership that will continue to play a key role in the long term. A/ First of all, our two countries’ strategic proximity reflects the similarity of the challenges we face : - We are of similar size . But on the new world stage, we no longer reach the critical mass; - We have similar values and similar responsibilities . Our two nations are permanent members of the UN Security Council, key members of the European Union, key members of NATO; - Both our nations have a nuclear deterrent , which places us in a category of our own, with specific responsibilities and a specific policy stake in the complex world of counter-proliferation; - We face similar challenges and threats .
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • ONR's Statutory Determination of the Off-Site Emergency Planning And
    ONR’s statutory determination of the off-site emergency planning and public information areas for Barrow in accordance with the requirements of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations 2001 (REPPIR) regulations 9 and 16 Project Assessment Report ONR-COP-PAR-14-006 Revision 0 10 12 2014 © Office for Nuclear Regulation, 2014 If you wish to reuse this information visit www.onr.org.uk/copyright.htm for details. Published 12/14 For published documents, the electronic copy on the ONR website remains the most current publicly available version and copying or printing renders this document uncontrolled. Office for Nuclear Regulation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ONR’s statutory determination of the off-site emergency planning and public information areas for Barrow in accordance with the requirements of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations 2001 (REPPIR) regulations 9 and 16 This Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) Project Assessment Report (PAR) describes and explains the basis for ONR’s re-determination of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations (REPPIR) off-site emergency planning area and the area within which prior information is to be distributed around the Barrow GB nuclear site and nuclear warship site. The determination of a REPPIR off-site emergency planning area defines the area around a site within which, in the opinion of ONR, any member of the public is likely to be affected by a reasonably foreseeable radiation emergency (as defined in REPPIR), and constitutes an important component of the UK’s overall emergency response framework. In relation to this area, the local authority is required to prepare an adequate off-site emergency plan with the purpose of minimising, so far as is reasonably practicable, radiation exposures to those likely to be affected by such an emergency.
    [Show full text]