DOCSLIB.ORG

ONR's Statutory Determination of the Off-Site Emergency Planning And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ONR's Statutory Determination of the Off-Site Emergency Planning And ONR’s statutory determination of the off-site emergency planning and public information areas for Barrow in accordance with the requirements of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations 2001 (REPPIR) regulations 9 and 16 Project Assessment Report ONR-COP-PAR-14-006 Revision 0 10 12 2014 © Office for Nuclear Regulation, 2014 If you wish to reuse this information visit www.onr.org.uk/copyright.htm for details. Published 12/14 For published documents, the electronic copy on the ONR website remains the most current publicly available version and copying or printing renders this document uncontrolled. Office for Nuclear Regulation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ONR’s statutory determination of the off-site emergency planning and public information areas for Barrow in accordance with the requirements of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations 2001 (REPPIR) regulations 9 and 16 This Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) Project Assessment Report (PAR) describes and explains the basis for ONR’s re-determination of the Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations (REPPIR) off-site emergency planning area and the area within which prior information is to be distributed around the Barrow GB nuclear site and nuclear warship site. The determination of a REPPIR off-site emergency planning area defines the area around a site within which, in the opinion of ONR, any member of the public is likely to be affected by a reasonably foreseeable radiation emergency (as defined in REPPIR), and constitutes an important component of the UK’s overall emergency response framework. In relation to this area, the local authority is required to prepare an adequate off-site emergency plan with the purpose of minimising, so far as is reasonably practicable, radiation exposures to those likely to be affected by such an emergency. This plan will detail the potential need to implement appropriate countermeasures within all or part of this area. REPPIR requires operators to undertake hazard identifications and risk evaluations (HIRE) in relation to work with ionising radiations (including where there are material changes to such work) as specified in REPPIR. These HIREs must identify all hazards on the sites with the potential to cause a radiation accident, and evaluate the nature and magnitude of the risks to employees and other persons (e.g. those who live or work nearby) arising from those hazards. REPPIR also requires operators to assess their HIRE and to send a Report of Assessment (RoA) to ONR either prior to commencement of the work with ionising radiation, following any relevant material change in this work, or at least within three years from the last assessment. REPPIR also makes provision for ONR to request additional information. In practice, it is usual for the HIRE information itself to be requested to inform ONR’s determinations. ONR has historically used the term detailed emergency planning zone (DEPZ) to refer to the area it defined under REPPIR regulation 9 as requiring an off-site emergency plan. (The term is still used this way in some ONR guidance.) As the term is not used within REPPIR itself (although referred to in the related guidance), and to ensure legal clarity and avoid misunderstanding amongst stakeholders, this report refers to the ‘REPPIR off-site emergency planning area’ and the ‘REPPIR prior information area’ under regulations 9 and 16 respectively rather than to ‘detailed emergency planning zone’ or ‘DEPZ’. The off-site local authority emergency planning area around the Barrow sites, as provided for in REPPIR regulations 9(1) and 16(1), was first determined in 2002 - a short while after REPPIR came into force in 2001. The current area is represented by overlapping circular areas of radius 2 km around the two sites and is based on the radiological hazards assessed for a routine operational submarine berth. This re-determination has been undertaken in response to REPPIR submissions to ONR by BAE Systems Marine Limited in relation to the GB nuclear site (Wet Dock Quay) and by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) for the nuclear warship site (Ramsden Dock Basin). In these submissions, the dutyholders highlight the differences in the hazards associated with activities at the Barrow sites compared to a routine submarine operational berth. This leads to a reduction in the size of the technical area associated with the reference accident, specifically for the Barrow sites, compared to routine submarine operational berths. This re-determination has been undertaken in accordance with ONR’s regulatory processes, guidance associated with REPPIR itself, and the relevant ONR Technical Assessment Guide (TAG). In conducting the re-determination of the REPPIR off-site emergency planning area Office for Nuclear Regulation for Barrow, ONR has applied its’ recently published determination principles and associated guidance for the determination of such areas. These principles recognise the learning that has emerged from global events such as occurred at Fukushima and the need to review the scope of off-site emergency planning. They also reflect ONR’s insistence on and commitment to high standards of nuclear safety and security at nuclear installations, and its continual efforts to seek improvements to standards and to the consistency and transparency of its decision-making. ONR’s determination process requires that: (i) Technical assessments be undertaken, by ONR, of BAE Systems Marine Ltd and the MOD’s Hazard Identification and Risk Evaluations (HIREs) and Reports of Assessment (RoAs) for the respective sites. These have been completed and are reported separately. These technical assessments conclude that areas of radius of 690 m around the reference accident locations at the Wet Dock Quay and Ramsden Dock Basin should be used as the foundation for defining the extent of the need for local authority off-site emergency planning under regulation 9 of REPPIR. (ii) In accordance with the relevant ONR Technical Assessment Guide, ONR also gives appropriate consideration to practical and strategic factors relating to the planning and potential implementation of an off-site emergency plan, and other pragmatic factors appropriate to secure confidence as regards protection of the public. This aspect of the process includes dialogue with the relevant local authority (as the dutyholder within REPPIR to prepare the off-site plan), and considers, amongst other factors, local demographic and geographical considerations. ONR’s determination is therefore informed by a range of practical and common-sense factors which have the effect of defining a more practical area (from an emergency planning perspective) than that in (i) above. ONR’s principles emphasise the importance of ensuring that an appropriate balance is achieved between the assessment of technical submissions provided by the operator, and other practical and strategic considerations judged necessary in the interests of public safety. As a consequence, the ultimate determination of the REPPIR off-site emergency planning area represents ONR’s best regulatory judgement, and is not formed solely on the basis of technical considerations or criteria. The outcome of ONR’s review of the technical submissions made by operators, taking into account the relevant practical and strategic considerations relating specifically to Barrow, is that both the REPPIR off-site emergency planning area and the REPPIR prior information area for the Barrow sites will be re-defined to be the enhanced single area shown within the red line on the map contained in appendix C to this report. This area is geographically approximately twice the size but has a smaller population than the area previously defined. The change to the planning area (to include the whole of Walney Island) does not mean that ONR has identified a greater risk for those living near the site. On the contrary, ONR is satisfied that the overall risk from the two sites has been conservatively estimated. The changes therefore reflect an improved assessment of the risks specific to activities at the Barrow site; factors which ONR judges to be relevant in securing confidence as regards protection of the public during a reasonably foreseeable radiation emergency; the learning that has emerged from global events such as occurred at Fukushima; and the need to review the scope of off-site emergency planning. Office for Nuclear Regulation The key recommendations are: • That ONR write to Cumbria County Council, BAE Systems Ltd (WDQ) and the MOD (RDB) to advise that the REPPIR off-site emergency planning area has been determined as the area within the red line on the map at appendix C. • That ONR write to Cumbria County Council confirming the need to update, as required, its off-site emergency plan to adequately cover the area defined in recommendation 1. • That ONR write to BAESM (WDQ) and MOD (RDB) confirming the requirement to ensure the appropriate provision of prior information to the public within the area referred to in recommendation 1. This information should also be copied to Cumbria County Council. • ONR should notify the Defence Safety Nuclear Regulator (DNSR) of the revised REPPIR off-site emergency planning areas. Office for Nuclear Regulation LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USE D ABP Association of British Ports BAESM BAE Systems Marine CCA Civil Contingencies Act (2004) CCC Cumbria County Council DEPZ Detailed Emergency Planning Zone (Ref: REPPIR regulation 9(1)) DNSR Defence Safety Nuclear Regulator
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm TMZ – Final Report on the Stakeholder Consultation
    Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm TMZ – Final Report on the Stakeholder Consultation Date: 30 January 2015 Revision: Issue 1 Osprey Ref: 70791 020 This document is of UK origin and has been prepared by Osprey Consulting Services Limited (Osprey) and, subject to any existing rights of third parties, Osprey is the owner of the copyright therein. The document is furnished in confidence under existing laws, regulations and agreements covering the release of data. This document contains proprietary information of Osprey and the contents or any part thereof shall not be copied or disclosed to any third party without Osprey’s prior written consent. © Osprey Consulting Services Limited 2014 The Forge, London Road, Bentley, Hampshire. GU10 5HY 01420 520200 / [email protected] Registered in England and Wales under No: 6034579 Document Details Reference Description Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm TMZ – Final Report on Document Title the Stakeholder Consultation Document Ref 70791 020 Issue Issue 1 Date 30 January 2015 Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm TMZ – Final Report on the Stakeholder Consultation | Document 2 Details 70791 020 | Issue 1 Executive Summary DONG Energy is the Sponsor for a proposed airspace change over the existing operational Walney Offshore Wind Farms (1 and 2), the Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm, West of Duddon Sands (WoDS), Ormonde and Barrow Wind Farms, located northwest of Morecambe Bay in the Irish Sea. As part of the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) Airspace Change Process (ACP)(CAP 725) [Reference 1], DONG Energy is required to submit a case to the CAA to justify the establishment of a Transponder Mandatory Zone (TMZ) over the existing Walney, WoDS, Ormonde and Barrow Wind Farms and the Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm, and to undertake a consultation exercise with all relevant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawcoat Health Profile
    Hawcoat This resource gives an overview of the health profile for wards within Hawcoat. Inequalities in people’s experience of health still present significant challenges in Cumbria, with people in the most affluent areas living up to 20 years longer than those in more disadvantaged circumstances. These unfair and avoidable differences in health between social groups are what we mean by health inequalities. In Cumbria there are a number of areas of concern, including; Relatively large numbers of people living in housing that is in poor condition High levels of fuel poverty A low proportion of the workforce educated to degree level or higher Low employment levels amongst people with disabilities On average men in Cumbria lose 10 months of life, and women 4.5 months, directly attributable to alcohol 50-60 suicides each year. Ward profiles Administrative geographies – and particularly wards – have traditionally been used for collecting and publishing statistics. Wards are well-established and, unlike Electoral Divisions, they will not change. Ward profiles enable us to gain a deeper understanding or the differences in health status between areas. % of Electoral Division's Electoral Division Wards in Electoral Division Population that fall within the Ward Hawcoat Hawcoat 77.5 Newbarns 22.5 The below data, as well as insights you gain from talking with communities and through working with community groups, are invaluable in gaining an understanding of the health needs and priority in that community. Other sources of data Area profiles for
    [Show full text]
  • Building Better Opportunities
    Building Better Opportunities Project outline For use in England only Project title Project 3 of 3 – Barriers to Work (Barrow and South Lakeland) LEP area Cumbria Project reference number Cum/2/3 ESF Thematic Objective 9: Promoting social inclusion and combating poverty ESF Investment Priority 1.4: Active inclusion Funding available £1,368,400 Project start period July 2016 to November 2016 Latest date for completion December 2019 Date open for applications 8 October 2015 Deadline for stage one applications 12 noon on 30 November 2015 Important information about this project outline This project outline represents just one strand of the overall funding that is available through Building Better Opportunities. As this is a joint programme with the European Social Fund, we will only consider applications that clearly meet a project outline and meet the requirements set out in our programme guide. As you read this project outline, please note the following: This project outline is subject to any changes made by the European Commission or the Managing Authority to the rules governing ESF in England. The Big Lottery Fund will upload any updates to https://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/esf. It is your responsibility to review the page regularly to keep abreast of any changes that may have an impact on your application. You must apply for the full amount of funding available shown, which we will award to just one applicant or partnership to deliver the project described in this outline. The project must be delivered in the LEP area(s) shown and within any specific project location we’ve identified within this outline.
    [Show full text]
  • River Frontage
    PORT OF BARROW-IN-FURNESS Site: Site size (Available land area etc): • South Side of Ramsden Dock = Lay down and storage area of 18 – 20 acres • North Side of Anchor Line Basin = Lay down and storage area of 10 – 12 acres • Additional land adjacent to Port Estate available Details of wet and dry dock facilities/ river frontage/ site quayside accessibility: • Approx 500m of general quay frontage • A further 500m (approx) of quay frontage with heavy lift capability • BAE Systems Shipbuilding Facility partly located within port estate. Buildings and warehousing: • 6000m2 warehouse on site • Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate offers opportunities for new buildings and warehouse facility. Maximum Vessel capacity (length, width, draught (m)): • Length = up to 200 metres (subject to certain criteria for vessels over 170m LOA) • Beam = Dock entrance width = 36 metres • Draught = variable but typically up to 8 metres or more • No.1 Dock Gate opens 2.5 hours before high water, closes at high water or shortly after. Nearby industrial sites (approx. distance from port) vacant or otherwise: • Vacant Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate = approx 40 acres Location, Transport and Connections - Location i.e. nearest cities/industrial areas: • Barrow-in-Furness Town Centre = 1.5km away from the port • Lancaster = 75km • Preston = 108km • Manchester = 160km Major road, rail, water and air transport links: • A590 – From Barrow = 50km to M6 Motorway • Rail – Dock rail link to Furness Line which is connected to West Coast main Line
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • Roosecote (Barrow)
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE 02 October 2012 A Report by the Assistant Director Planning and Sustainability _____________________________________________________________________________ Reference No: EN010044 Applicant: Centrica RPS Limited, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5GB District: Barrow Borough Council ______________________________________________________________________ Proposal: To consider a joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council Local Impact Report relating to an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to enable the applicant to construct and operate a new Biomass electricity generating station with a nominal capacity of 90MW, together with a number of associated developments Location: Land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness ______________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 To approve the joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council prepared Local Impact Report, as set out in Annex A, and to refer it to Cabinet and for Cabinet to make representation about whether the Council supports the proposal or not, taking account the Local Impact Report agreed by DC&R. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On the 3 rd July 2012, Centrica RPS Limited submitted an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate) to build and operate a 90MW (gross)/80MW (Net) biomass electricity generating power station on land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness. 2.2 As the biomass facility is an on-shore electricity generating station having a capacity of more than 50MW, it is deemed a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) within the definition contained in Sections 14 & 15 of the Planning Act 2008, as amended. The application for the DCO will therefore be determined by the Secretary of State, via the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate).
    [Show full text]
  • Ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST of PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES by WIRELESS
    — l i ­ ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST OF PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES BY WIRELESS Nom du Port* — Cir­ Adresse télégraphique de Détails sur la Station de Noms et adresses des Agents Renseigne­ conscription adminis­ l'Autorité saintoire du Port réception des messages habilités pour recevoir et trans­ m ents com­ trative (entre paren­ et Indicatif d'appel* mettre les messages plementaires thèses) voir page. [Réponse à Question Sjf [Réponse à Question 3]t [Réponse à Question 3 ] t [Réponse à Question 4]t Name of Port* — Admi­ Telegraphic Address of Port Particulars of receiving Names and addresses of approved Supplemen­ nistrative Local Area Health Authority Station accepting messa­ Agents for receiving and trans­ tary Infor­ (between bracketsJ ges and signal call • mitting messages mation [Reply to Question. 2] t [Reply to Question a] T [Reply to Question 4 ]t see p age' [Reply to Question 311 1 * o 3 * 4 5 AFRIQUE — AFRICA AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE FRANÇAISE — FRENCH WEST AFRICA Dakar I A g e n t p r i n c i p a l S a n t é I Dakar côtier I Aucun (None) 23 I D a k a r 1 | CONGO BELGE — BELGIAN CONGO Banana j S a n i p o r t B a n a n a j — j Aucun (None) 23 CÔTE FRANÇAISE DES SOMALIS — FRENCH SOMALILAND Djibouti I S e r v i c e quarantenaire I — I Aucun (None) 24 D j i b o u t i | I ILE MAURICE — MAURITIUS Port Louis P o r t H e a l t h O f f i c e r 1 — 1 None (Aucun) 24 P o r t L o u i s | I RÉUNION Port des Galets S x n té m a r it im e I Saint-Denis I Aucun (None) 25 P o r t d e s G a l e t s | Reunion | SIERRA LEONE Freetown H e a l t h F r e e t o w n Freetown None (Aucun) 25 Cable and Wireless Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Control Weekly List
    PLANNING COMMITTEE 06/08/2019 Delegated Decisions made between 25/06/2019 and 18/07/2019 For Information Ladies and Gentlemen, Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) Planning (Listed buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended) Town & Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) Town and County Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007. The Planning applications in this report have been determined by the Development Services Manager (Planning) under delegated authority (Minute No. 107, Executive Committee, 7th February 2018, confirmed by Council 1st March 2018 (Minute No. 63). The decisions are reported for your information. Assistant Director of Regeneration and Built Environment Reference: Location: Ward: B21/2019/0412 77 Saves Lane Ireleth Askam-in-Furness Cumbria Dalton North LA16 7HL Ward Decision: APPCOND Proposal: Parish: Removal of roof structure and raising to provide Askam and Decision Date: first floor living accommodation by 900mm. Ireleth Parish 28/06/2019 Construction of two storey side and front extension Council to provide ground floor garage, boot room, utility room and wc with bedroom at first floor and Case Officer: installation of a first floor balcony - re-submission Jennifer of 2018/0216 as approved with the addition of a Dickinson rear balcony Reference: Location: Ward: B21/2019/0427 7 Dendron Close Dalton-in-Furness Cumbria LA15 Dalton South 8XF Ward Decision: APPCOND Proposal: Parish: Rear living room area/kitchen extension and side
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous. 191 Would Be Formed on the Other Side of The
    Miscellaneous. 191 would be formed on the other side of the Mollusc's track ; and the observer would at once pronounce the marks to be due to a gigantic Crossopodia, or fringe-footed Annelide.—Yours truly, A. BEYSON. Hawkhill,' Edinburgh. THE FALCONER MEMORIAL.—At a meeting held in London on the 25th of February, Sir Proby T. Cautley, K.C.B., in the chair, it was resolved to record the great loss sustained by Science in the early death of the late Dr. Hugh Falconer, and to perpetuate his name as a Naturalist and a Scholar by a suitable Memorial. It was unani- mously resolved that this Memorial should include a Marble Bust, to be placed in the rooms of one of the Scientific Societies, or else- where, in London, as might be determined. One of the objects in which the late Dr. Falconer took deep interest, up to the latest hour of Iiis life, was the foundation of Fellowships or Scholarships in the University of Edinburgh, to enable deserving students to prolong their studies beyond the usual academical period. It was therefore further resolved to collect funds for the purpose of founding, in that University, a Fellowship or Scholarship in Natural Science, tenable for a limited term of years, and to be called ' The Falconer Fellow- ship ' or ' Scholarship.' The Presidents of the Royal, Linnean, Geological, Geographical, and Ethnological Societies, and many other friends and admirers of Dr. Falconer, have formed a Committee for promoting the objects of the ' Falconer Memorial.' THE LATE EARTHQUAKE IN THE NORTH OP ENGLAND.—On Wednesday, the 15th of January, an earthquake of very unusual severity occurred in Morecambe Bay, and the neighbouring district of Furness.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 - 2018 Part 4: Europe & Canada Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 4: Europe & Canada. The other parts are: Part 1: Introduction Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee
    PLANNING COMMITTEE 23/06/2020 Delegated Decisions made between 26/02/2020 and 10/06/2020 For Information Ladies and Gentlemen, Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) Planning (Listed buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended) Town & Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) Town and County Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007. The Planning applications in this report have been determined by the Development Services Manager (Planning) under delegated authority (Minute No. 107, Executive Committee, 7th February 2018, confirmed by Council 1st March 2018 (Minute No. 63). The decisions are reported for your information. Assistant Director of Regeneration and Built Environment Reference: Location: Ward: B21/2020/0053 1 St Lukes Avenue, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, Risedale Ward LA13 9TS Decision: Parish: APPCOND Proposal: N/A Single storey rear kitchen extension with flat roof Decision Date: incorporating glass atrium/lantern. Case Officer: 20/03/2020 Jennifer Dickinson Reference: Location: Ward: B21/2019/0806 30 Market Street Dalton-in-Furness Cumbria LA15 Dalton South 8AA Ward Decision: APPCOND Proposal: Parish: Single storey extension (2 metres x 2 metres) to Dalton Town Decision Date: rear elevation. with Newton 10/03/2020 Parish Council Case Officer: Jennifer Dickinson Reference: Location: Ward: B28/2019/0693 Sandscale Park Helipad Sandscale Park Barrow- Ormsgill Ward in-Furness Cumbria LA14 4QT Decision: Parish: APPROVED Proposal: Askam and Application for approval of details reserved by Ireleth Parish Decision Date: Condition No. 5 (noise mitigation) of planning Council 03/04/2020 permission 2019/0388 Variation of condition no.4 (Flights not to exceed 6 per day) for planning Case Officer: application B18/2017/0628 (Construction of a Charles Wilton temporary Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Heliport Facility, on land off Sandscale Park/Partylite Manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbrian Railway Ancestors D Surnames Surname First Names
    Cumbrian Railway Ancestors D surnames Year Age Surname First names Employment Location Company Date Notes entered entered Source service service WW1 service, 4th Kings Own (Royal Dacre F. Supt of Line's Dept FR FUR 1914-18 0 FR Roll of Honour Lancaster) Regt., Private Dacre Frank Clerk Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/05/1911 AMB Dacre R. Yardman Cleator Moor Goods JTL 25/06/1892 Wage 24/- pw. Resigned JtL minute Nov 92 Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 27/12/1869 Entered servive on 18/- 20/- Mar 1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Fined 2/6 for being worse for drink and Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/01/1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 leaving lamps burning Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/06/1872 Discharged for fighting Jun 1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Richard Temporary Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 01/03/1875 Entered service. Discharged May 1875 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Richard Signalman Roose FUR 30/11/1875 Entered service on 20/- 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Richard Signalman Roose FUR 10/03/1876 Resigned 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Robert Porter Whitehaven Preston St FUR 25/11/1867 Entered service on 18/- 1867 24 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Signalman Whitehaven Corkickle FUR 31/03/1868 Transferred from Preston St on 20/- 1867 24 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Pointsman Dalton FUR 00/11/1869 Transferred from Corkicle on 20/- 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Pointsman Ulverston FUR 00/01/1870 From Dalton 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Transferred from Ulverston Resigned Dacre Robert Pointsman Carnforth FUR 00/01/1870 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Apr 1871 Dacre Robert Pointsman at Dock Basin Barrow Goods FUR 20/11/1871 Entered service on 20/- 1871 30 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Moved from Barrow on 20/- 22/- Nov Dacre Robert Pointsman Furness Abbey FUR 00/03/1872 1871 30 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 1872 Resigned Feb 1873 Daffern G.W.
    [Show full text]