IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA DAVID HACKBART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) 2:07Cv1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA DAVID HACKBART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) 2:07Cv1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID HACKBART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:07cv157 ) Electronic Filing THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, and SGT. ) BRIAN ELLEDGE, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION March 23, 2009 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, David Hackbart (“Hackbart”), filed the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violation of his rights under the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States by Defendants, the City of Pittsburgh (the “City”) and Sergeant Brian Elledge (“Elledge”). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the matter is now before the Court. II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On April 10, 2006, Hackbart was traveling along Murray Avenue in the Squirrel Hill section of the City of Pittsburgh, looking for a place to park his vehicle when he saw an open metered parking space. Plaintiff’s Concise Statement of Undisputed Fact (hereinafter “Pl. CSUF”) ¶¶ 2 - 4; Defendants’ Concise Statement of Material Facts (hereinafter “Def. CSMF”) ¶ 1. As Hackbart was attempting to back into the parking space, a vehicle pulled up behind him and effectively blocked Hackbart’s entry into the parking space. Pl. CSUF ¶ 5; Def. CSMF ¶ 2. The driver of the vehicle behind Hackbart would not back up. Def. CSMF ¶ 6. Frustrated, Hackbart extended his left arm out the window of his vehicle and extended his middle finger to the driver. Pl. CSUF ¶ 6. At that time, Elledge was in uniform traveling along Murray Avenue in the direction opposite of Hackbart, and was driving a marked City of Pittsburgh police vehicle. Pl. CSUF ¶ 9. As Hackbart was giving the driver behind him the finger, he heard Elledge say “Don’t flip him off.” Pl. CSUF ¶ 8; Def. CSMF ¶ 9. Hackbart responded by directing the same gesture toward Elledge. Pl. CSUF ¶ 8; Def. CSMF ¶ 12. Elledge activated the lights on his patrol car and turned around on Murray Avenue so he was traveling in the same direction as Hackbart. Pl. CSUF ¶ 11. Seeing the lights on the police vehicle, Hackbart proceeded approximately one (1) block to a public parking lot where Elledge conducted a motor vehicle stop. Pl. CSUF ¶¶ 12 & 13; Def. CSMF ¶ 15. Elledge approached Hackbart’s vehicle and asked him for his driver’s license and Social Security number. Plaintiff’s Appendix D, Elledge Deposition (hereinafter “Pl. App. D, Elledge Depo”) p. 11. Elledge told Hackbart that he was going to be cited for disorderly conduct “for flipping the guy off . .” Pl. App. D, Elledge Depo p. 12. Elledge issued Hackbart a citation charging him with violation of Pennsylvania’s Disorderly Conduct statute, specifically 18 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 5503(a)(3). Pl. CSUF ¶ 16; Def. CSMF ¶ 16. In Section 20 of the citation, Elledge wrote: “Disorderly Conduct. Driver made an obscene gesture towards me. Flipped me off while driving by. Also flipped off another driver.” Pl. App. E; Pl. App. D, Elledge Depo p. 13. On June 12, 2006, Hackbart attended a hearing before a Magisterial District Judge in Pittsburgh Municipal Court. Pl. CSUF ¶ 20. Elledge did not attend the hearing. Id. The District Judge found Hackbart guilty of Disorderly Conduct and imposed a fine as well as court costs in the total amount of $119.75. Pl. CSUF ¶ 21. Hackbart filed a summary appeal from the judgment of the District Judge with the Allegheny County Clerk of Courts. Pl. CSUF ¶ 22. On October 17, 2006, Hackbart, with counsel, attended a hearing on his summary appeal at which the Assistant District Attorney withdrew the disorderly conduct charge against him. Pl. CSUF ¶¶ 23 & 24. Hackbart then brought the instant action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First, Fourth and 2 Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States against the City and Elledge. Hackbart alleges that the City has a custom, pattern, practice and/or policy of authorizing its officers to issue citations under Pennsylvania’s disorderly conduct statute based upon the use of profane, but not obscene, language and gestures which are expressions protected by the First Amendment. It is further alleged that the City fails to appropriately train, supervise and discipline officers who issue disorderly conduct citations in violation of citizens’ rights of free expression. III. LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P 56(c), summary judgment shall be granted when there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. To support denial of summary judgment, an issue of fact in dispute must be both genuine and material, i.e., one upon which a reasonable fact finder could base a verdict for the non-moving party and one which is essential to establishing the claim. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). When considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is not permitted to weigh the evidence or to make credibility determinations, but is limited to deciding whether there are any disputed issues and, if there are, whether they are both genuine and material. Id. The court’s consideration of the facts must be in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment and all reasonable inferences from the facts must be drawn in favor of that party as well. Whiteland Woods, L.P. v. Township of West Whiteland, 193 F.3d 177, 180 (3d Cir. 1999), Tigg Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp., 822 F.2d 358, 361 (3d Cir. 1987). When the moving party has carried its burden under Rule 56(c), its opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986). In the language of the Rule, the nonmoving party must come forward with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” FED. R. CIV. P 56(e). Further, the nonmoving party cannot rely on 3 unsupported assertions, conclusory allegations, or mere suspicions in attempting to survive a summary judgment motion. Williams v. Borough of W. Chester, 891 F.2d 458, 460 (3d Cir.1989) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986)). The non-moving party must respond “by pointing to sufficient cognizable evidence to create material issues of fact concerning every element as to which the non-moving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Simpson v. Kay Jewelers, Div. Of Sterling, Inc., 142 F. 3d 639, 643 n. 3 (3d Cir. 1998), quoting Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 762 n.1 (3d Cir. 1994). IV. DISCUSSION 1. Section 1983 First and Fourth Amendment Retaliation Claims Section 1983 provides that: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While § 1983 is not itself a source of substantive rights, Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137 144 n.3 (1979), the section provides a remedy for violations of constitutional rights where the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law. Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137, 1141 (3d Cir. 1995). To establish a prima facie case under § 1983, a plaintiff must show that the action occurred “under color of state law1” and that the action deprived the plaintiff of a constitutional right or a federal statutory right. See Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981). The initial 1 There is no dispute that Elledge was acting under color of state law. 4 question in a Section 1983 action, then, is whether the plaintiff has alleged a deprivation of a constitutional right. See Donahue v. Gavin, 280 F.3d 371, 378 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 841 n.5 (1998)). Hackbart has alleged a claim against the City and Elledge, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for retaliating against Hackbart for exercising his rights to free expression under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has held that “[o]fficial reprisal for protected speech ‘offends the Constitution [because] it threatens to inhibit exercise of the protected rights,’ and the law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions, including criminal prosecutions, for speaking out.” Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 256, (2006) (quoting Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 588 n.10 (1998)). In general, to state a constitutional retaliation claim, a plaintiff must prove: (1) that he engaged in constitutionally-protected activity; (2) that the government responded with retaliation; and (3) that the protected activity caused the retaliation. Eichenlaub v. Twp. of Indiana, 385 F.3d 274, 282 (3d Cir. 2004). Whether the activity is protected is a question of law, while the remaining inquiries are questions of fact. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown, 455 F.3d 225, 241 (3d Cir. 2006). A. Hackbart’s Constitutionally-Protected Activity The United States Supreme Court has long recognized that non-verbal gestures and symbols may be entitled to First Amendment protection.
Recommended publications
  • A Comprehensive Survey on Various Biometric Systems
    International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 5 (2018) pp. 2276-2297 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com A Comprehensive Survey on Various Biometric Systems T.Sabhanayagam 1, Dr. V. Prasanna Venkatesan2 and Dr. K. Senthamaraikannan3 1 Research Scholar, Center for Computer and Information Technology Engineering, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India. 1And Assistant Professor, School of Computing, SRMIST, Chennai 1Orcid: 0000-0002-9782-7068 2 Dr.V.Prasanna Venkatesan, Proof & Head, Dept. of Banking Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India. 3 Dr. K.Senthamaraikannan, Prof & Head, Dept. of Statistics, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India. Abstract Biometrics gains significant importance in this technical world and it means analysis of biological data. It is defined as the technology of analyzing individual person based on physiological, behavioural or morphological traits such as face, fingerprint, iris, retina, voice, and signature etc,. It is possible to establish one’s identity with the help of biometric techniques. Today biometric have been successfully deployed in various fields like forensic science, security, identification and authorization system. For the last three decades, lot of research work has to be carried out for the growth of biometric system based on fingerprint, voice, iris, face, etc, but recently new biometrics has been come up. To provide a comprehensive survey, this paper presents an
    [Show full text]
  • The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary
    Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui THE PROTREPTICUS OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA: A COMMENTARY to; ga;r yeu'do" ouj yilh'/ th'/ paraqevsei tajlhqou'" diaskedavnnutai, th'/ de; crhvsei th'" ajlhqeiva" ejkbiazovmenon fugadeuvetai. La falsedad no se dispersa por la simple comparación con la verdad, sino que la práctica de la verdad la fuerza a huir. Protréptico 8.77.3 PREFACIO Una tesis doctoral debe tratar de contribuir al avance del conocimiento humano en su disciplina, y la pretensión de que este comentario al Protréptico tenga la máxima utilidad posible me obliga a escribirla en inglés porque es la única lengua que hoy casi todos los interesados pueden leer. Pero no deja de ser extraño que en la casa de Nebrija se deje de lado la lengua castellana. La deuda que contraigo ahora con el español sólo se paliará si en el futuro puedo, en compensación, “dar a los hombres de mi lengua obras en que mejor puedan emplear su ocio”. Empiezo ahora a saldarla, empleándola para estos agradecimientos, breves en extensión pero no en sinceridad. Mi gratitud va, en primer lugar, al Cardenal Don Gil Álvarez de Albornoz, fundador del Real Colegio de España, a cuya generosidad y previsión debo dos años provechosos y felices en Bolonia. Al Rector, José Guillermo García-Valdecasas, que administra la herencia de Albornoz con ejemplar dedicación, eficacia y amor a la casa. A todas las personas que trabajan en el Colegio y hacen que cumpla con creces los objetivos para los que se fundó. Y a mis compañeros bolonios durante estos dos años. Ha sido un honor muy grato disfrutar con todos ellos de la herencia albornociana.
    [Show full text]
  • Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Had Murdered Krystle Marie Campbell, Lingzi Lu, Martin Richard, and Officer Sean Collier, He Was Here in This Courthouse
    United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-6001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Thompson, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges. Daniel Habib, with whom Deirdre D. von Dornum, David Patton, Mia Eisner-Grynberg, Anthony O'Rourke, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Clifford Gardner, Law Offices of Cliff Gardner, Gail K. Johnson, and Johnson & Klein, PLLC were on brief, for appellant. John Remington Graham on brief for James Feltzer, Ph.D., Mary Maxwell, Ph.D., LL.B., and Cesar Baruja, M.D., amici curiae. George H. Kendall, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Timothy P. O'Toole, and Miller & Chevalier on brief for Eight Distinguished Local Citizens, amici curiae. David A. Ruhnke, Ruhnke & Barrett, Megan Wall-Wolff, Wall- Wolff LLC, Michael J. Iacopino, Brennan Lenehan Iacopino & Hickey, Benjamin Silverman, and Law Office of Benjamin Silverman PLLC on brief for National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, amicus curiae. William A. Glaser, Attorney, Appellate Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, with whom Andrew E. Lelling, United States Attorney, Nadine Pellegrini, Assistant United States Attorney, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, John F. Palmer, Attorney, National Security Division, Brian A. Benczkowski, Assistant Attorney General, and Matthew S. Miner, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, were on brief, for appellee. July 31, 2020 THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. OVERVIEW Together with his older brother Tamerlan, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev detonated two homemade bombs at the 2013 Boston Marathon, thus committing one of the worst domestic terrorist attacks since the 9/11 atrocities.1 Radical jihadists bent on killing Americans, the duo caused battlefield-like carnage.
    [Show full text]
  • This List of Gestures Represents Broad Categories of Emotion: Openness
    This list of gestures represents broad categories of emotion: openness, defensiveness, expectancy, suspicion, readiness, cooperation, frustration, confidence, nervousness, boredom, and acceptance. By visualizing the movement of these gestures, you can raise your awareness of the many emotions the body expresses without words. Openness Aggressiveness Smiling Hand on hips Open hands Sitting on edge of chair Unbuttoning coats Moving in closer Defensiveness Cooperation Arms crossed on chest Sitting on edge of chair Locked ankles & clenched fists Hand on the face gestures Chair back as a shield Unbuttoned coat Crossing legs Head titled Expectancy Frustration Hand rubbing Short breaths Crossed fingers “Tsk!” Tightly clenched hands Evaluation Wringing hands Hand to cheek gestures Fist like gestures Head tilted Pointing index finger Stroking chins Palm to back of neck Gestures with glasses Kicking at ground or an imaginary object Pacing Confidence Suspicion & Secretiveness Steepling Sideways glance Hands joined at back Feet or body pointing towards the door Feet on desk Rubbing nose Elevating oneself Rubbing the eye “Cluck” sound Leaning back with hands supporting head Nervousness Clearing throat Boredom “Whew” sound Drumming on table Whistling Head in hand Fidget in chair Blank stare Tugging at ear Hands over mouth while speaking Acceptance Tugging at pants while sitting Hand to chest Jingling money in pocket Touching Moving in closer Dangerous Body Language Abroad by Matthew Link Posted Jul 26th 2010 01:00 PMUpdated Aug 10th 2010 01:17 PM at http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/07/26/dangerous-body-language-abroad/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=digg You are in a foreign country, and don't speak the language.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand Gestures
    L2/16-308 More hand gestures To: UTC From: Peter Edberg, Emoji Subcommittee Date: 2016-10-31 Proposed characters Tier 1: Two often-requested signs (ILY, Shaka, ILY), and three to complete the finger-counting sets for 1-3 ​ (North American and European system). None of these are known to have offensive connotations. HAND SIGN SHAKA ● Shaka sign ​ ● ASL sign for letter ‘Y’ ● Can signify “Aloha spirit”, surfing, “hang loose” ● On Emojipedia top requests list, but requests have dropped off ​ ​ ● 90°-rotated version of CALL ME HAND, but EmojiXpress has received requests for SHAKA specifically, noting that CALL ME HAND does not fulfill need HAND SIGN ILY ● ASL sign for “I love you” (combines signs for I, L, Y), has moved into ​ ​ mainstream use ● On Emojipedia top requests list ​ HAND WITH THUMB AND INDEX FINGER EXTENDED ● Finger-counting 2, European style ● ASL sign for letter ‘L’ ● Sign for “loser” ● In Montenegro, sign for the Liberal party ● In Philippines, sign used by supporters of Corazon Aquino ● See Wikipedia entry ​ ​ HAND WITH THUMB AND FIRST TWO FINGERS EXTENDED ● Finger-counting 3, European style ● UAE: Win, victory, love = work ethic, success, love of nation (see separate proposal L2/16-071, which is the source of the information ​ ​ below about this gesture, and also the source of the images at left) ● Representation for Ctrl-Alt-Del on Windows systems ● Serbian “три прста” (tri prsta), symbol of Serbian identity ​ ​ ● Germanic “Schwurhand”, sign for swearing an oath ​ ​ ● Indication in sports of successful 3-point shot (basketball), 3 successive goals (soccer), etc. HAND WITH FIRST THREE FINGERS EXTENDED ● Finger-counting 3, North American style ● ASL sign for letter ‘W’ ● Scout sign (Boy/Girl Scouts) is similar, has fingers together ​ Tier 2: Complete the finger-counting sets for 4-5, plus some less-requested hand signs.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen a Cultural History of Gesture Bremmer, JN
    University of Groningen A Cultural History Of Gesture Bremmer, J.N.; Roodenburg, H. IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 1991 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Bremmer, J. N., & Roodenburg, H. (1991). A Cultural History Of Gesture. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 The 'hand of friendship': shaking hands and other gestures in the Dutch Republic HERMAN ROODENBURG 'I think I can see the precise and distinguishing marks of national characters more in those nonsensical minutiae than in the most important matters of state'.
    [Show full text]
  • Unveiling Baubo: the Making of an Ancient Myth for the Degree Field Of
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Unveiling Baubo: The Making of an Ancient Myth A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of Comparative Literary Studies By Frederika Tevebring EVANSTON, ILLINOIS December 2017 2 © Copyright by Frederika Tevebring 2017 All Rights Reserved 3 Abstract “Unveiling Baubo” describes how the mythical figure Baubo was constructed in nineteenth-century German. Associated with the act of exposing herself to the goddess Demeter, Baubo came to epitomize questions about concealment and unveiling in the budding fields of archaeology, philology, psychoanalysis and literary theory. As I show in my dissertation, Baubo did not exist as a coherent mythical figure in antiquity. Rather, the nineteenth-century notion of Baubo was mediated through a disparate array of ancient and contemporary sources centered on the notion of sexual vulgarity. Baubo emerged as a modern amalgam of ancient parts, a myth of a myth invested with the question of what modernity can and should know about ancient Greece. The dissertation centers on the 1989 excavation of the so-called Baubo statuettes, a group of Hellenistic votive figurines discovered at Priene, in modern-day Turkey. The group adheres to a consistent and unique iconography: the face of the female figures is placed directly onto their torso, giving the impression that the vulva and chin merge. Based on the statuettes’ “grotesque- obscene” appearance, archaeologist concluded that they depicted Baubo, the woman who greeted Demeter at Eleusis when the goddess was searching for her abducted daughter Persephone. According to late antique Church Fathers, Demeter refused the locals’ offerings of food and drink until Baubo cheered her up by lifting her skirt, exposing herself to the goddess.
    [Show full text]
  • Many Times We Tend to Use Our Hands to Explain Our Needs and Thoughts
    Many times we tend to use our hands to explain our needs and thoughts. The same hand gesture may mean something quite nasty and offensive to a person from a different cultural background. Hand gestures are a very important part of the body language gestures. In this article we shall understand what are hand gestures. What are Hand Gestures? Hand gestures are a way of communicating with others and conveying your feelings. These gestures are most helpful when one is speaking to someone with no language in common. The meanings of hand gestures in different cultures may translate into different things. To explain my point, I take a very common example of former President George W. Bush who had to face a major faux pas during a visit to Australia. He tried to signal a peace sign by waving the two finger or V-sign at the crowd. You may think of this as a simple gesture, but he committed a major error. Instead of his palm facing outwards, it faced inwards. The meaning of this hand gesture in Australia meant he was asking the crowd to go screw themselves! A grave error committed by the then most powerful man in the world. Therefore, it is very important to understand the meanings of gestures before you travel to different countries. Before you communicate with people in different cultures, you need to understand the meaning of gestures. Those considered as a good gestures in one country may be termed as an offensive gesture in some countries. So, if you are a frequent flier to different countries, improve your communication skills by learning the meaning of hand gestures.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascoltare Con Gli Occhi Il Linguaggio Non Verbale E Le Differenze Culturali
    Corso di Laurea magistrale in Scienze Del Linguaggio Tesi di Laurea: Ascoltare con gli Occhi Il Linguaggio Non Verbale e le Differenze Culturali Relatore Ch. Prof. Fabio Caon Correlatore Ch. Prof. Graziano Serragiotto Laureando Marco Munari Matricola 820853 Anno Accademico 2014 / 2015 ASCOLTARE CON GLI OCCHI IL LINGUAGGIO NON VERBALE E LE DIFFERENZE CULTURALI INDICE: INTRODUCTION 1. INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE 2. NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION 2.1 KINESICS 2.1.1 FACE AND EMOTIONS 2.1.1.1 HAPPINESS 2.1.1.2 SADNESS 2.1.1.3 FEAR 2.1.1.4 ANGER 2.1.1.5 DISGUST 2.1.1.6 SURPRISE 2.1.1.7 COUNTERFEITING EMOTIONS 2.1.2 THE GAZE 2.1.2.1 GAZE AND MUTUAL GAZE 2.1.2.1.1 REGULATING THE FLOW OF COMMUNICATION 2.1.2.1.2 MONITORING FEEDBACK 2.1.2.1.3 DISPLAYING COGNITIVE ACTIVITY 2.1.2.1.4 EXPRESSING EMOTIONS 2.1.2.1.5 COMMUNICATING THE TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INTERLOCUTORS 2.1.2.2 DILATION AND CONTRACTION OF PUPILS 2.1.2.3 THE GLANCE AS GUIDE TO THE COGNITIVE PROCESSES 2.1.3 HANDS AND ARMS 2.1.3.1 INDIPENDENT GESTURES 2.1.3.2 DIPENDENT GESTURES 2.1.3.2.1 GESTURES BOUND TO REFERENT/SPEAKER 2.1.3.2.2 GESTURES INDICATIVE OF REFERENT/SPEAKER RELATIONSHIP 2.1.3.2.3 PUNCTUATION GESTURES 2.1.3.2.4 INTERACTIVE GESTURES 2.1.3.3 SELF-HANDLING 2.1.3.4 FREQUENCY OF GESTURES 2.1.3.5 INTERACTIVE SYNCHRONY 2.1.3.6 WIDESPREAD GESTURES 2.1.4 PHYSICAL CONTACT 2.1.5 LEGS AND FEET 2.1.6 DIRECTION OF THE BODY AND POSTURE 2.1.6.1 INTERPERSONAL ATTITUDES 2.1.7 SMELLS AND NOISES OF THE BODY 2.2 PROSSEMICA 2.2.1 LO SPAZIO PERSONALE 2.2.2 INVASIONE DEL TERRITORIO 2.2.3 DENSITÀ ED AFFOLLAMENTO 2.2.4 COMPORTAMENTI SPAZIALI 2.2.4.1 IN ASCENSORE 2.2.4.2 IN MACCHINA 2.2.4.3 DA SEDUTI 2.3 VESTEMICA 2.4 OGGETTEMICA 3 IL LINGUAGGIO PARAVERBALE 3.1 ESPRESSIONE DELLE EMOZIONI 3.2 ATTEGGIAMENTI INTERPERSONALI 3.3 INFORMAZIONI SUL MITTENTE 3.3.1 PERSONALITÀ 3.3.2 CLASSE SOCIALE 3.3.3 SESSO 3.3.4 ETÀ 3.4 PROSODIA E COMPRENSIONE 3.5 PROSODIA E PERSUASIONE 3.6 PROSODIA E TURNI DI PAROLA 3.7 PAUSE E SILENZI 4 NATURAL VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Finger Angle-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Smart Infrastructure Using Wearable Wrist-Worn Camera
    applied sciences Article Finger Angle-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Smart Infrastructure Using Wearable Wrist-Worn Camera Feiyu Chen 1, Jia Deng 1, Zhibo Pang 2 ID , Majid Baghaei Nejad 3, Huayong Yang 1 and Geng Yang 1,* 1 State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (H.Y.) 2 ABB Corporate Research Sweden, Vasteras 72178, Sweden; [email protected] 3 Electrical Engineering Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar 9617976487, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 February 2018; Accepted: 28 February 2018; Published: 3 March 2018 Featured Application: Interaction with domestic robots and appliances in smart infrastructure. Abstract: The arising of domestic robots in smart infrastructure has raised demands for intuitive and natural interaction between humans and robots. To address this problem, a wearable wrist-worn camera (WwwCam) is proposed in this paper. With the capability of recognizing human hand gestures in real-time, it enables services such as controlling mopping robots, mobile manipulators, or appliances in smart-home scenarios. The recognition is based on finger segmentation and template matching. Distance transformation algorithm is adopted and adapted to robustly segment fingers from the hand. Based on fingers’ angles relative to the wrist, a finger angle prediction algorithm and a template matching metric are proposed. All possible gesture types of the captured image are first predicted, and then evaluated and compared to the template image to achieve the classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Antonia Reinke Printing Copy UL
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo CONCEPTS OF (UN)DRESSING IN GREEK DRAMA Antonia Marie Reinke (née Schrader) Murray Edwards College Faculty of Classics, University of CamBridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2019 PREFACE This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the word limit prescribed by the Faculty of Classics. iii iv ABSTRACT Concepts of (Un)dressing in Greek Drama Antonia Marie Reinke In recent years, dramatic props and costumes have become the focus of a renewed scholarly interest in the performance aspects of Greek drama. This has entailed, in particular, a shift away from enquiries into the ostensible realia of Greek staging to explorations of their complex con- structions, semiotics and agencies in the plays and their cultural contexts more widely.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Memories/Modern Identities Paul Allen Miller and Richard H
    CLASSICAL MEMORIES/MODERN IDENTITIES Paul Allen Miller and Richard H. Armstrong, Series Editors All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. Ancient Sex New Essays EDITED BY RUBY BLONDELL AND KIRK ORMAND THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS • COLUMBUS All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. Copyright © 2015 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient sex : new essays / edited by Ruby Blondell and Kirk Ormand. — 1 Edition. pages cm — (Classical memories/modern identities) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8142-1283-7 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Sex customs—Greece—History. 2. Sex customs—Rome—History. 3. Gender identity in literature. 4. Sex in literature. 5. Homosexuality—Greece—History. I. Blondell, Ruby, 1954– editor. II. Ormand, Kirk, 1962– editor. III. Series: Classical memories/modern identities. HQ13.A53 2015 306.7609495—dc23 2015003866 Cover design by Regina Starace Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Garamond Pro Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. Cover image: Bonnassieux, Jean-Marie B., Amor clipping his wings. 1842. Close-up. Marble statue, 145 x 67 x 41 cm. ML135;RF161. Photo: Christian Jean. Musée du Louvre © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY Bryan E. Burns, “Sculpting Antinous” was originally published in Helios 35, no. 2 (Fall 2008). Reprinted with permission. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American Na- tional Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials.
    [Show full text]