DOCSLIB.ORG

RECORD of PLAN CONFORMANCE and CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RECORD of PLAN CONFORMANCE and CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) CX Log #: OR-014-CX-05-24 Lease or Serial #: N/A Project Name: _Wood River Channel Maintenance___________________________________________ Location: ___Wood River Wetland_________________________________ County: Klamath County BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #: 541-883-6916 Applicant: ____________________________ Address: _______________________________ Description of the Proposed Action: The BLM plans to fill two short canals that were formed in the 1960’s and 1970’s when material was excavated from the wetland to construct a levee (see Attachment 1, Wood River channel maintenance location map). These canals created open water connections between the Wood River and Agency Lake. In 2000 BLM placed rock weirs across these channels as a component of the river restoration project below Dike Bridge (see Attachment 2, Existing Topography Over 2002 Aerial Photo and Attachment 3, Grading Plans). The mouth of the Wood River was relocated to a historic channel, lengthening the river by about ¾ mile. The purpose of the river restoration project is to improve habitat and water quality for fish and wildlife by restoring hydrologic function in the Wood River Delta. The placement of rock weirs in the east and west canals has limited boat access except when the lake is very full. This proposed project is designed to fill the canals, located approximately 150 feet downstream (south) of the Wood River bridge on the entrance road to Wood River Wetland. The purpose is to maintain the channel plugs and stop the flow of the Wood River from entering these channels. Approximately 1200 cubic yards of fill material will be moved from an existing borrow site located in T34s, R71/2e, section 14, NW 1/4. Both of these side channels already have had rock and gravel fill placed in them through a previously approved project, where they intersect the Wood River. Additional rock was added to maintain the channel plug on the west side of the Wood River in 2002. Sheet piling would be placed in a north/south line across the west channel at a top elevation equal to surrounding ground elevation (see Attachment 4, Cross Sections and Longitudinal Profile). Fill material will then be placed on either side of the sheet piling. After filling the two sections of canal (side channels), native plant material that has been removed from the west side of the haul route (between the borrow site and the project site) will be placed on top of the fill. This vegetation will act to stabilize the fill and provide habitat for wildlife. The borrow site is approximately 2.5 miles north of the area to be filled and is an upland site. The fill material from the borrow area consists of secondary deposits excavated during the Wood River Wetland restoration project in 1996. Up to 300 cubic yards of rock may be trucked in to this project from a commercial quarry and used as fill. Once the canals are filled, water quality along the northeast shore of Agency Lake should remain improved over water quality conditions prior to the restoration work. Prior to the river channel restoration, water flowed a short distance below Dike Bridge before entering Agency Lake to the west. Now the Wood River meanders through the historic delta parallel to the east shore of Agency Lake and enters the lake at the southeast end of the Wood River delta. There are many small side channels connecting the Wood River to Agency Lake. Water from the Wood River flows through these natural channels until water levels in Agency Lake drop in late summer. In addition, because of the increase in water levels in the Wood River (up to 16 inches near Dike Bridge in September 2002), there is a pressure gradient that forces seepage through the delta wetland. Surface flow through the natural side channels is also sustained much later in the season because of the higher water surface elevations in the river. Filling the side canals thoroughly will enhance and sustain these processes. BLM conducted pre project and post project water temperature monitoring in Agency Lake to determine the affects of channel relocation on water temperature in the Wood River delta area. Results of this monitoring show that water temperatures after restoration are much lower in the vicinity of the relocated river mouth and in areas south of the wetland and Mallard Bay. IMPLEMENTATION DATE This project is expected to be implemented in fall 2005. PLAN CONFORMANCE The above project has been reviewed and found to be in conformance with one or more of the following BLM plans or NEPA analyses: Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, February 1996, (Wood River ROD/RMP). Refer to Page 3-22. IDENTIFICATION OF EXCLUSION CATEGORY The proposed action has been identified as a categorical exclusion under Bureau of Land Management 516 DM 6, Appendix 5 # H (11): “Actions where BLM has concurrence or coapproval with another DOI agency and the action is categorically excluded for that DOI agency.”; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 516 DM 8.5, Categorical Exclusions, # B (3): “The construction of new, or the addition of, small structures or improvements, including structures and improvements for the restoration of wetland, riparian, instream, or native habitats, which result in no or only minor changes in the use of the affected local area.” COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT The proposed action is categorically excluded from further analysis or documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in accordance with 516 DM2, Appendix 1, 1.12 if it does not meet any of the following Exceptions (listed in 516 DM 2, Appendix 2; IM No. OR-2002-130). Will the proposed action meet the following Exceptions? Exception Yes No 1. Have significant adverse effects on public health or safety? ( ) ( X ) 2. Have adverse effects on such unique geographic characteristics or features, or on special ( ) ( X ) designation areas such as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands; wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands; or ecologically significant or critical areas, including those listed on the National Register of Natural Landmarks. This also includes significant caves, ACECs, National Monuments, WSAs, RNAs. 3. Have highly controversial environmental effects (40 CFR 1508.14)? ( ) ( X ) 4. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or unique or ( ) ( X ) unknown environmental risks? 5. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future ( ) ( X ) actions with potentially significant environmental effects? 6. Be directly related to other actions with individually insignificant, but significant ( ) ( X ) cumulative environmental effects? This includes connected actions on private lands (40 CFR 1508.7 and 1508.25(a)). CX-05-24_Wood River Channel Maintenance Page 2 7. Have adverse effects on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of ( ) ( X ) Historic Places? This includes Native American religious or cultural sites, archaeological sites, or historic properties. 8. Have adverse effects on species listed or proposed to be listed as Federally Endangered or ( ) ( X ) Threatened Species, or have adverse effects on designated critical habitat for these species? This includes impacts on BLM-designated sensitive species or their habitat. When a Federally listed species or its habitat is encountered, a Biological Evaluation (BE) shall document the effect on the species. The responsible official may proceed with the proposed action without preparing a NEPA document when the BE demonstrates either 1) a “no effect” determination or 2) a “may effect, not likely to adversely effect” determination. 9. Fail to comply with Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management), Executive Order ( ) ( X ) 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (water resource development projects only)? 10. Violate a Federal, State, Local, or Tribal law, regulation or policy imposed for the ( ) ( X ) protection of the environment, where non-Federal requirements are consistent with Federal requirements? 11. Involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA ( ) ( X ) section 102(2)(E)) not already decided in an approved land use plan? 12. Have a disproportionate significant adverse impacts on low income or minority ( ) ( X ) populations; Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)? 13. Restrict access to, and ceremonial use of, Indian sacred sites by Indian religious ( ) ( X ) practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites; Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)? 14. Have significant adverse effect on Indian Trust Resources? ( ) ( X ) 15. Contribute to the introduction, existence, or spread of: Federally listed noxious weeds ( ) ( X ) (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act); or invasive non-native species; Executive Order 13112 (Invasive Species)? 16. Have a direct or indirect adverse impact on energy development, production, supply, ( ) ( X ) and/or distribution; Executive Order 13212 (Actions to Expedite Energy-Related Projects)? The proposed action would not create adverse environmental effects or meet any of the above exceptions. DOCUMENTATION OF RECOMMENDED MITIGATION Note: although none of the conditions for the above exceptions are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tenth Western Black Bear Workshop
    PROCEEDINGS of the TENTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP The Changing Climate for Bear Conservation and Management in Western North America Lake Tahoe, Nevada Image courtesy of Reno Convention and Visitors Authority 18-22 May 2009 Peppermill Resort, Reno, Nevada Hosted by The Nevada Department of Wildlife A WAFWA Sanctioned Event Carl W. Lackey and Richard A. Beausoleil, Editors PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP 18-22 May 2009 Peppermill Resort, Reno, Nevada Hosted by Nevada Department of Wildlife A WAFWA Sanctioned Event Carl W. Lackey & Richard A. Beausoleil Editors International Association for Bear Research and Management SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR WORKSHOP SPONSORS International Association for Bear Research & Management Wildlife Conservation Society Nevada Wildlife Record Book Nevada Bighorns Unlimited - Reno Nevada Department of Wildlife Carson Valley Chukar Club U.S. Forest Service – Carson Ranger District Safari Club International University of Nevada, Reno - Cast & Blast Outdoors Club Berryman Institute Suggested Citation: Author’s name(s). 2010. Title of article or abstract. Pages 00-00 in C. Lackey and R. A. Beausoleil, editors, Western Black Bear Workshop 10:__-__. Nevada Department of Wildlife 1100 Valley Road Reno, NV 89512 Information on how to order additional copies of this volume or other volumes in this series, as well as volumes of Ursus, the official publication of the International Association for Bear Research and Management, may be obtained from the IBA web site: www.bearbiology.com, from the IBA newsletter International Bear News, or from Terry D. White, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Klamath Summary Report
    SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT — KLAMATH BASIN GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATION From the top of a fault formed ridge overlooking the expansive Upper Klamath Lake, the rest of the world seems to fall away. Unbroken blue skies and dry, thin air stretches the horizon impossibly far. To the east, parched buttes roll through deep, green farm-filled valleys. To the west, only the rugged, snow- capped Cascades can rein in the view. The feeling of freedom that defines the American West is alive in this place. Prepared by the Oregon Water Resources Department — October 1999 he Klamath Basin defies the soggy Northwest stereotype. The Cascade TMountains steal the moisture from eastward winds, transforming the damp, green Oregon known to most of the country. Away from the mountainsides, Lodge Pole and Ponderosa Pines supplant the water-dependent firs. The moss-covered logs and thick tangles of plants of the western forests are gone. In their place, reddish- black volcanic rocks speckle hillsides adorned with dusty sage. Sandy pumice soils are exposed to the wind and sun by the sparse ground cover. Everything seems to crack and crumble underfoot. Despite these desert-like conditions, an oasis of lakes, rivers, and marshes teams with wildlife. The remnants of a huge prehistoric lake once provided a cache of resources that allowed the Basin’s earliest human inhabitants to thrive in an otherwise formi- dable environment. Much time has passed and cultures have changed, but the reliance on these same resources has not. For more than 100 years, settlers, homesteaders, and their descendants have defied the desert by transforming vast lakes and marshes into farms and pasture–creating a heritage in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Channel Restoration and Recreation Improvements Final EA
    Wood River Channel Restoration and Recreation Improvements EA #OR-014-08-10 PROJECT TITLE/TYPE: Wood River Wetland Restoration and Recreation Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: BLM Wood River Wetland and delta (See Project Location Map 1 in Appendix C.) The restoration and recreation improvements would be along the lower Wood River located approximately 10 miles west of Chiloquin, Oregon. The legal locations of the proposed actions are T34S, R 7.5 E Sections 25 (channel narrowing and deepening and floodplain restoration) and 36 (secondary channel outlet). BLM OFFICE: Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview District CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE PLANS This Environmental Assessment (EA) is tiered to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans of the Western Oregon Bureau of Land Management (2008), including the Klamath Falls Resource Area. The analysis in the FEIS incorporated the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River RMP/EIS (1995). Since no changes in management direction were made for the Wood River wetland, this project is in conformance with management direction under the 2008 Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (2008 ROD) • Vegetation Treatment on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Lands in Thirteen Western States FEIS and ROD (1991) • Integrated Noxious Weed Control Program EA #OR-013-93-03 (1994) • Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, 1996 INTRODUCTION Major restoration of the floodplain, delta and river channel of the lower Wood River began in 1996. These efforts were guided by the goals and objectives outlined in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, 1996 (RMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Monitoring of Upper Klamath- Agency Lakes Adfluvial Redband Trout
    Life History and Monitoring of Upper Klamath- Agency Lakes Adfluvial Redband Trout William R. Tinniswood (Author) Michael Harrington (Editor) Klamath Watershed District Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Introduction Spawning surveys are the primary monitoring tool for monitoring bull trout and anadromous fish species in Oregon (Jacobs et al. 2009, Gallagher et al. 2007, Jacobsen et al. 2014,). Randomized redd counts are utilized to monitor steelhead escapement on coastal Oregon tributaries (Jacobsen et al. 2014). Numerous studies of disparate salmonid species have shown positive significant relationships between redd counts and estimates of escapement (Gallagher et al. 2007), redd counts are strongly correlated with adult escapements (Dunham et al. 2001) and bull trout redd counts can detect a 50% decline in the population over 10 years (Howell and Sankovich 2012). However, redd counts can have significant sources of bias and error (Dunham et al. 2001), 5 year trends in redd counts can be misleading (Howell and Sankovich 2012) and redd counts should be conducted by experienced surveyors (Howell and Sankovich 2012, Muhlfield et al. 2006). The primary sources of spawning survey error include (Dunham et al. 2001, Holocek and Walters 2007). 1) Inexperienced and/or surveyor variability 2) Index surveys 3) Species overlap (ie. brown trout, brook trout, and hatchery rainbow trout) 4) Redd identification a. Test redds, b. Double counting , c. Omitting redds, d. Counting redds caused by hydraulic scour e. sample size otherwise known as number of spawning surveys conducted or redd age f. Superimposition g, substrate type, coloration, and productivity h. flow i. visibility j. habitat complexity k.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Osprey Platform Relocation___ CX Log #: CX-09-01 Project Location: Wood River Wetland T34S, R71/2E, Sect
    RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Project Name: _Wood River Osprey Platform Relocation___ CX Log #: CX-09-01 Project Location: Wood River Wetland_T34S, R71/2E, sect. 13 and 21 Lease or Serial #: _N/A____ BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area County: Klamath County, Oregon A. Backgound Description of Proposed Action: Use a chainsaw to fall the existing pole with an osprey platform on it just north of the Wood River Wetland pumping station. Transport the pole and platform with a tracked excavator to the other side of the wetland to a location along the 7-mile canal levy road, dig a hole, and re-plant the pole in the new location on the wetland (East) side of the 7- mile levy road. All digging would occur with an archaeologist or archaeology technician on site to monitor the excavation for cultural resources. Purpose and Need for the Project: The current platform is used annually by osprey, however, the nest is rarely successful. It is suspected that administrative visits to the wetland pump station and points north during the breeding season result in the female leaving the nest for periods of time long enough to fatally chill the eggs. Moving the pole/platform to a more remote area of the wetland will reduce breeding season disturbance and is expected to increase reproductive success of the osprey on the Wetland. Proposed Implementation: This project is expected to be implemented in the fall or early winter of 2008, and is expected to last 1 day.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Big Wood River Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR BIG WOOD RIVER BASIN WETLANDS by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center June 1997 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Stephen P. Mealey, Director Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD990484-01-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................i LIST OF FIGURES........................................................ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ii LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................iii SUMMARY.............................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...................................................iv INTRODUCTION ........................................................1 SURVEY AREA .........................................................2 STATUS OF WETLANDS..................................................3 National Wetlands Inventory...............................................3 Wetland Acreage ......................................................4 Wetland Types........................................................5 Wetland Ownership and Protected Status....................................7 Wetland Condition.......................................................10 Wetland Losses .......................................................10 Functional Shifts......................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Record for Wood River Wetland Plan
    Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Record for Wood River Wetland Plan BLM Office: Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview District (OR-014) Subject Planning Documents: Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (BLM/OR/WA/PL-96/010+1792); and Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement (BLM/OR/WA/PL- 95/030+1792); Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance Compliance Record 7/09/1997. Proposed Action Title/Type: Wood River Channel Restoration Project Location of Proposed Action: Lower .6 miles of Wood River. The project area includes portions of Township 34 South, Range 7 ½ East, Sections 36, approximately 25 miles north of Klamath Falls, Oregon, in Klamath County. Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action is to conduct an extension of the restoration work in the Wood River Channel involving instream work per Oregon Trout proposal dated May 5, 1997 (available for review in Klamath Falls BLM office). In the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement, this work was identified as part of Alternatives B and C, for that portion of the river between the confluence of Crooked Creek and the bridge near Agency Lake. Engineering feasibility studies completed since the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) indicate that the proposal for stream channel restoration in Alternative D would be very costly without any guarantee of producing the desired results or meeting the stated plan objectives. Studies completed by a contractor for Oregon Trout, Inc. (available for inspection in the Klamath Falls Resource Area Office during normal working hours) now indicate that the stream channel restoration approach to re-establishing the historic meanders of the Wood River channel through its historic delta form is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River CEAP Final Report
    Wood River, Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon Conservation Effects Assessment Project Special Emphasis Watershed Final Report April 2010 Overview of the Wood River Valley in Oregon Prepared by the Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call Wood River CEAP 5/4/2010 i (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Foreword The Wood River CEAP study was initiated as a special emphasis watershed project in 2005 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) through the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). CEAP began in 2003 as a multi-agency effort to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practices used by private landowners participating in selected United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs. Funding from CEAP has provided a unique opportunity to address current issues in the Wood River Watershed while also providing insights into the methodologies that can be used to measure the effectiveness of conservation in similar watersheds throughout the western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Ditch Fish Screen
    Wood River Ditch Fish Screen State(s): Oregon Managing Agency/Organization: Trout Unlimited Type of Organization: Nonprofit Project Status: Underway Project type: WNTI Project Project action(s): : Fish passage, Riparian or Instream Habitat Restoration Trout species benefitted: Interior Redband Trout Population: Wood River, upper Klamath Basin Project summary: The Wood River Ditch (WRD), Klamath County, Oregon, provides 30 cubic feet per second (CFS) of water delivery to irrigate approximately 2,175 acres in the Wood River valley. Three conventional, fixed-speed irrigation pumps provide water from the Wood River to the WRD. A rotary drum fish screen was installed at the point of diversion on the right bank of the Wood River by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in 1997; however, the fish screen is in disrepair and no longer prevents native fish, including Redband Trout from becoming entrained in the ditch. In 2016 and 2017, ODFW personnel collected over 400 age-0 and age-1 Redband Trout in the ditch. Furthermore, the point of diversion is located immediately downstream of most Redband Trout spawning habitat in the Wood River. Trout Unlimited (TU) is working with the water users, the landowner, ODFW, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Forest Service to address these issues. The goal of this project is to eliminate entrainment of native fishes while ensuring water delivery by installing a functioning fish screen and energy efficient irrigation pumps. This project represents an important step in protecting Redband Trout populations in the upper Klamath basin (UKB), reducing energy demand and water withdrawals, establishing collaborative and conservation- focused partnerships with private landowners and water users, and builds upon recent restoration efforts in the Wood River watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Wetlands
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Lakeview District Offce IN REPLY REFER TO: P.O. Box 151 (1000 Ninth Street S.) Lakeview, Oregon 97630 1617(014) Dear Reader: This is a consolidated document which includes the Record of Decision (ROD), and Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Resource Management Plan (RMP). This plan was approved by the Oregon/Washington State Director in November 1995. The ROD approves the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) decisions for managing 3,220 acres in Klamath County, Oregon. The Record of Decision was prepared in conformance with 40 CFR 1505.2, which requires a concise document which links the manager's decision to the analysis presented in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), dated July 1995. The ROD shows bow environmental impacts and other factors were considered in the decision-making process. The ROD documents approval and adoption of the proposed Resource Management Plan, as described in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement. Minor differences from the FEIS, points of clarification and management direction have been incorporated in response to both public comment on the FEIS as well as on-going staff review. It should be noted that there were no protests on the proposed Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland RMP/FEIS. In addition, the Governor of Oregon was provided a formal opportunity to review the proposed plan for conformance with officially approved or adopted natural resource-related plans, programs, or policies of the state or local governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Resident bull trout at Dixon Creek. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office Klamath Falls, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. B-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ...................................................... B-3 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ..................................................... B-7 Ongoing Klamath Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ................................... B-10 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...................................................................................... B-12 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... B-15 Implementation Schedule for the Klamath Recovery Unit ....................................................... B-24 References ................................................................................................................................. B-30 Appendix I. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for the Klamath Recovery Unit ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Notice FREMONT-WINEMA NATIONAL FOREST Forestry
    Outreach Notice FREMONT-WINEMA NATIONAL FOREST Forestry Technician (Timber Sale Prep) GS-462-04/05 PSE 18/8 Chiloquin or Chemult Ranger Districts The Position This position serves as a forestry technician responsible for timber sale layout, traversing sale areas using GPS devices, timber cruising, timber marking according to silvicultural guidelines, and assessing roads and terrain to determine logging feasibility. This permanent, seasonal position serves in a zoned capacity across the west side of the Fremont-Winema National Forest. The zone includes the Klamath, Chiloquin, and Chemult Ranger Districts. The duty station may be either Chiloquin or Chemult, OR. The incumbent will also perform other resource or fire duties as qualified and assigned. PLEASE NOTE: The purpose of this outreach notice is to inform prospective applicants of this upcoming opportunity and to determine interest in the positions. Reply by date is: September 5, 2018 The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotapes, etc) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9401 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA Forest Service is an equal opportunity provider and employer Hearing impaired applicants may contact TDD numbers (541) 947-6384.
    [Show full text]