DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B – References

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B – References Appendix B – References Appendix B – References Abney, R.M. 1964. A Comparative Study of the Past and Present Condition of Tule Lake. Submitted to Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Tulelake, California: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Akins, G.J. 1970. The Effects of Land Use and Land Management on the Wetlands of the Upper Klamath Basin. Thesis, Western Washington State College. Anderson, D.W., D.G. Raveling, R.W. Risebrough, and A.M. Springer. 1984. Dynamics of low-level organochlorines in adult cackling geese over the annual cycle. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48(4):1112–1127. Aneja, V.P., W.H. Schlesinger, and J.W. Erisman. 2009. Effects of agriculture upon the air quality and climate: Research, policy, and regulations. Environmental Science & Technology 43(12):4234–4240. Anthony, R.G., and F.B. Isaacs. 1989. Characteristics of bald eagle nest sites in Oregon. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53(1):148–159. Anthony, R.G., R.L. Knight, G.T. Allen, B.R. McClelland, and J.I. Hodges. 1982 (in Service 1996a). Habitat use by nesting and roosting bald eagles in the Pacific Northwest. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 47:332–342. Applegate, R.D., and L. Scott. 2005. Ring-Necked Pheasant Survive with Broken Wings. Notes, The Prairie Naturalist 37(3). Baird, S.F. 1859. Description of new genera and species of North American lizards in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. The Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 10:253–256. Banish, N.P., B.J. Adams, and R.S. Shively. 2007. Distribution and Habitat Associations of Radio-Tagged Adult Lost River Suckers and Shortnose Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon: 2005–2006 Report. Klamath Falls, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Field Station. Banks, P.B., and J.V. Bryant. 2007. Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas. Biology Letters 3:611–613. Barnett, T.P., D.W. Pierce, H.G. Hildalgo, C. Bonfils, B.D. Santer, T. Das, G. Bala, A.W. Wood, T. Nozawa, A.A. Mirin, D.R. Cayan, and M.D. Dettinger. 2008. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 309:1080–1083. Barr, B.R., M.E. Koopman, C.D. Williams, S.J. Vynne, R. Hamilton, and B. Doppelt. 2010. Preparing for Climate Change in the Klamath Basin. National Center for Conservation Science and Policy, and The Climate Leadership Initiative. B-1 Barry, P., B. Hayes, E. Janney, R. Shively, A. Scott, and C. Lutton. 2007. Monitoring of Lost River (Deltistes luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes brevirostris) Suckers in Gerber and Clear Lake Reservoirs 2005–2006. Klamath Falls, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Field Station. Barske, P. 1956. Waterfowl Wasted by Crippling. The Conservation Volunteer. Minnesota Department of Conservation. Bartolome, J.W., W.E. Frost, N.K. McDougald, and J.M. Connor. 2006. California Guidelines for Residual Dry Matter (RDM) Management on Coastal and Foothill Annual Rangelands. Davis: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rangeland Management Series Pub. 8092 (Revised). Bartolome, J.W., R.D. Jackson, and B. Allen-Diaz. 2009. Developing data-driven descriptive models for California grassland. In New Models for Ecosystem Dynamics and Restoration, edited by R.J. Hobbs and K. Suding, pp. 124–135. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Baruch-Mordo, S., J.S. Evans, J.P. Severson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, J.M. Kiesecker, M.J. Falkowski, C.A. Hagen, and K.P. Reese. 2013. Saving sage-grouse from the trees: A proactive solution to reducing a key threat to a candidate species. Biological Conservation 167:233–241. Bates, B.C., Z.W. Kundzewicz, S. Wu, and J.P. Palutikof (eds.). 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. Baumann, P.A., P.A. Dotray, and E.P. Prostko. 1999. Herbicides, How They Work and the Symptoms They Cause. B-6081. College Station: Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M University. Beale, C.M., and P. Monaghan. 2004. Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? British Ecological Society, Journal of Applied Ecology 41:335–343. Beckstrand, J.W. 2009. Restoration and Recovery of Greater Sage Grouse in the Devil's Garden Population Management Unit, Modoc County, California: Progress Report and Proposal. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bedell, T.E, L.E. Eddleman, T. Deboodt, and C. Jacks. 1993. Western Juniper, Its Impact and Management in Oregon Rangelands. EC 1417. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service. Beebee, R.A., and M. Manga. 2004. Variation in the Relationship between Snowmelt Runoff in Oregon and ENSO and PDO. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40(4):1011–1024. Bell, C.B. 2011. Nest Site Characteristics and Nest Success of Translocated and Resident Greater Sage Grouse at Clear Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Master’s thesis, Department of Natural Resources: Wildlife, California State University at Humboldt, Arcata. B-2 Bell, J.L., L.C. Sloan, and M.A. Snyder. 2004. Regional changes in extreme climatic events: A future climate scenario. Journal of Climate 17:81–87. Bellrose, F.C. 1976. Ducks, Geese, and Swans of North America. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. Bendire, C.E. 1889. The Lost River sucker. Forest and Stream 32:444–445. Benke, A.C., and C.E. Cushing. 2005. Rivers of North America: The Natural History. Academic Press. Bennet, J.K. 1994. Bioassessment of irrigation drainwater effects on aquatic resources in the Klamath Basin of California and Oregon. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington. Blanc, R., M. Guillemain, J-B. Mouronval, D. Desmonts, and H. Fritz. 2006. Effects of Non- Consumptive Leisure Disturbance to Wildlife. La Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie) 61:117–133. Boatman, N.D., N.W. Brickle, J.D. Hart, T.P. Milsom, A.J. Morris, A.W.A. Murray, K.A. Murray, and P.A. Robertson. 2004. Evidence for the indirect effects of pesticides on farmland birds. Ibis 146(Suppl. 2):131–143. Boellstorff, D.E., H.M. Ohlendorf, D.W. Anderson, E.J. O'Neill, J.O. Keith, and R.M. Prouty. 2005. Organochlorine chemical residues in white pelicans and western grebes from the Klamath Basin, California. Environmental Contamination Toxicology 14(4):485–493. Bortleson, G.C., and M.O. Fretwell. 1993. A Review of Possible Causes of Nutrient Enrichment and Decline of Endangered Sucker Populations in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Water- Resources Investigations Report 93-4087. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky (eds.). 2000. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bossenmaier, E.F. 1964. Cows and Cutter Bars. In Waterfowl Tomorrow, edited by J.P. Linduska. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife Service. Bowles, A.E. 1995. Response of wildlife to noise. In Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence through Management and Research, edited by R.L. Knight and D.N. Coles, pp. 109–156. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Boyd, C.S., J. Beck, and J. Tanaka. 2014. Livestock grazing and sage-grouse habitat: impacts and opportunities. Journal of Rangeland Applications 1:58–77. Boyd, M., S. Kirk, M. Wiltsey, and B. Kasper. 2002. Upper Klamath Lake Drainage Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Available at: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/tmdls/docs/klamathbasin/ukldrainage/tmdlwqmp.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2016. Boyer, R. 1993. Evaluation of water quality in relation to frogs at Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges. Master's thesis, University of Washington. B-3 Boyer, R., and C.E. Grue. 1994. Water Analyses for Agrochemical Input at Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, Oregon. Seattle: Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Fisheries, University of Washington. Boyle, J.C. 1976. 50 Years on the Klamath. Medford, Oregon: Klocker Printery. Boyle, S.A., and F.B. Samson. 1985. Effects of non-consumptive recreation on wildlife: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13:110–116. Bradbury, J.P. 1992. Late Cenozoic lacustrine and climatic environments at Tule Lake, northern Great Basin, USA. Climate Dynamics 6:275–285. Bradbury, J.W., R.M. Gibson, C.E. McCarthy, and S.L. Vehrencamp. 1988. Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24:15–24. Bratton, S.P. 1990. Boat Disturbance of Ciconiiformes in Georgia Estuaries. Colonial Waterbirds 13(2):124–128. Bregnballe, T., and J. Madsen. 2004. Tools in Waterfowl Reserve Management: Effects of Intermittent Hunting Adjacent to a Shooting-Free Core Area. Wildlife Biology 10:261– 268. Briske, David D. (ed.) 2011. Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Bryant, H.C. 1914. A survey of the breeding grounds of ducks in California in 1914. Condor 16:217–239. Buettner, M., and G.G. Scoppettone. 1990. Life History and Status of Catostomids in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fisheries Research Center, Reno Field Station. Completion report. 1991. Distribution and Information on the Taxonomic Status for the Shortnose Sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris, and Lost River Sucker, Deltistes luxatus, in the Klamath River Basin, California. California Department of Fish and Game, Seattle National Fisheries Research Center, Reno Substation. Completion Report, contract FG-8304. Bull, E., and J. Duncan. 1993. Great gray owl (Strix nebulosa). In The Birds of North America Online, edited by A. Poole. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tenth Western Black Bear Workshop
    PROCEEDINGS of the TENTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP The Changing Climate for Bear Conservation and Management in Western North America Lake Tahoe, Nevada Image courtesy of Reno Convention and Visitors Authority 18-22 May 2009 Peppermill Resort, Reno, Nevada Hosted by The Nevada Department of Wildlife A WAFWA Sanctioned Event Carl W. Lackey and Richard A. Beausoleil, Editors PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP 18-22 May 2009 Peppermill Resort, Reno, Nevada Hosted by Nevada Department of Wildlife A WAFWA Sanctioned Event Carl W. Lackey & Richard A. Beausoleil Editors International Association for Bear Research and Management SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR WORKSHOP SPONSORS International Association for Bear Research & Management Wildlife Conservation Society Nevada Wildlife Record Book Nevada Bighorns Unlimited - Reno Nevada Department of Wildlife Carson Valley Chukar Club U.S. Forest Service – Carson Ranger District Safari Club International University of Nevada, Reno - Cast & Blast Outdoors Club Berryman Institute Suggested Citation: Author’s name(s). 2010. Title of article or abstract. Pages 00-00 in C. Lackey and R. A. Beausoleil, editors, Western Black Bear Workshop 10:__-__. Nevada Department of Wildlife 1100 Valley Road Reno, NV 89512 Information on how to order additional copies of this volume or other volumes in this series, as well as volumes of Ursus, the official publication of the International Association for Bear Research and Management, may be obtained from the IBA web site: www.bearbiology.com, from the IBA newsletter International Bear News, or from Terry D. White, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Klamath Summary Report
    SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT — KLAMATH BASIN GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATION From the top of a fault formed ridge overlooking the expansive Upper Klamath Lake, the rest of the world seems to fall away. Unbroken blue skies and dry, thin air stretches the horizon impossibly far. To the east, parched buttes roll through deep, green farm-filled valleys. To the west, only the rugged, snow- capped Cascades can rein in the view. The feeling of freedom that defines the American West is alive in this place. Prepared by the Oregon Water Resources Department — October 1999 he Klamath Basin defies the soggy Northwest stereotype. The Cascade TMountains steal the moisture from eastward winds, transforming the damp, green Oregon known to most of the country. Away from the mountainsides, Lodge Pole and Ponderosa Pines supplant the water-dependent firs. The moss-covered logs and thick tangles of plants of the western forests are gone. In their place, reddish- black volcanic rocks speckle hillsides adorned with dusty sage. Sandy pumice soils are exposed to the wind and sun by the sparse ground cover. Everything seems to crack and crumble underfoot. Despite these desert-like conditions, an oasis of lakes, rivers, and marshes teams with wildlife. The remnants of a huge prehistoric lake once provided a cache of resources that allowed the Basin’s earliest human inhabitants to thrive in an otherwise formi- dable environment. Much time has passed and cultures have changed, but the reliance on these same resources has not. For more than 100 years, settlers, homesteaders, and their descendants have defied the desert by transforming vast lakes and marshes into farms and pasture–creating a heritage in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • RECORD of PLAN CONFORMANCE and CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
    RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) CX Log #: OR-014-CX-05-24 Lease or Serial #: N/A Project Name: _Wood River Channel Maintenance___________________________________________ Location: ___Wood River Wetland_________________________________ County: Klamath County BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #: 541-883-6916 Applicant: ____________________________ Address: _______________________________ Description of the Proposed Action: The BLM plans to fill two short canals that were formed in the 1960’s and 1970’s when material was excavated from the wetland to construct a levee (see Attachment 1, Wood River channel maintenance location map). These canals created open water connections between the Wood River and Agency Lake. In 2000 BLM placed rock weirs across these channels as a component of the river restoration project below Dike Bridge (see Attachment 2, Existing Topography Over 2002 Aerial Photo and Attachment 3, Grading Plans). The mouth of the Wood River was relocated to a historic channel, lengthening the river by about ¾ mile. The purpose of the river restoration project is to improve habitat and water quality for fish and wildlife by restoring hydrologic function in the Wood River Delta. The placement of rock weirs in the east and west canals has limited boat access except when the lake is very full. This proposed project is designed to fill the canals, located approximately 150 feet downstream (south) of the Wood River bridge on the entrance road to Wood River Wetland. The purpose is to maintain the channel plugs and stop the flow of the Wood River from entering these channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Channel Restoration and Recreation Improvements Final EA
    Wood River Channel Restoration and Recreation Improvements EA #OR-014-08-10 PROJECT TITLE/TYPE: Wood River Wetland Restoration and Recreation Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: BLM Wood River Wetland and delta (See Project Location Map 1 in Appendix C.) The restoration and recreation improvements would be along the lower Wood River located approximately 10 miles west of Chiloquin, Oregon. The legal locations of the proposed actions are T34S, R 7.5 E Sections 25 (channel narrowing and deepening and floodplain restoration) and 36 (secondary channel outlet). BLM OFFICE: Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview District CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE PLANS This Environmental Assessment (EA) is tiered to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans of the Western Oregon Bureau of Land Management (2008), including the Klamath Falls Resource Area. The analysis in the FEIS incorporated the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River RMP/EIS (1995). Since no changes in management direction were made for the Wood River wetland, this project is in conformance with management direction under the 2008 Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (2008 ROD) • Vegetation Treatment on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Lands in Thirteen Western States FEIS and ROD (1991) • Integrated Noxious Weed Control Program EA #OR-013-93-03 (1994) • Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, 1996 INTRODUCTION Major restoration of the floodplain, delta and river channel of the lower Wood River began in 1996. These efforts were guided by the goals and objectives outlined in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, 1996 (RMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Monitoring of Upper Klamath- Agency Lakes Adfluvial Redband Trout
    Life History and Monitoring of Upper Klamath- Agency Lakes Adfluvial Redband Trout William R. Tinniswood (Author) Michael Harrington (Editor) Klamath Watershed District Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Introduction Spawning surveys are the primary monitoring tool for monitoring bull trout and anadromous fish species in Oregon (Jacobs et al. 2009, Gallagher et al. 2007, Jacobsen et al. 2014,). Randomized redd counts are utilized to monitor steelhead escapement on coastal Oregon tributaries (Jacobsen et al. 2014). Numerous studies of disparate salmonid species have shown positive significant relationships between redd counts and estimates of escapement (Gallagher et al. 2007), redd counts are strongly correlated with adult escapements (Dunham et al. 2001) and bull trout redd counts can detect a 50% decline in the population over 10 years (Howell and Sankovich 2012). However, redd counts can have significant sources of bias and error (Dunham et al. 2001), 5 year trends in redd counts can be misleading (Howell and Sankovich 2012) and redd counts should be conducted by experienced surveyors (Howell and Sankovich 2012, Muhlfield et al. 2006). The primary sources of spawning survey error include (Dunham et al. 2001, Holocek and Walters 2007). 1) Inexperienced and/or surveyor variability 2) Index surveys 3) Species overlap (ie. brown trout, brook trout, and hatchery rainbow trout) 4) Redd identification a. Test redds, b. Double counting , c. Omitting redds, d. Counting redds caused by hydraulic scour e. sample size otherwise known as number of spawning surveys conducted or redd age f. Superimposition g, substrate type, coloration, and productivity h. flow i. visibility j. habitat complexity k.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Osprey Platform Relocation___ CX Log #: CX-09-01 Project Location: Wood River Wetland T34S, R71/2E, Sect
    RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Project Name: _Wood River Osprey Platform Relocation___ CX Log #: CX-09-01 Project Location: Wood River Wetland_T34S, R71/2E, sect. 13 and 21 Lease or Serial #: _N/A____ BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area County: Klamath County, Oregon A. Backgound Description of Proposed Action: Use a chainsaw to fall the existing pole with an osprey platform on it just north of the Wood River Wetland pumping station. Transport the pole and platform with a tracked excavator to the other side of the wetland to a location along the 7-mile canal levy road, dig a hole, and re-plant the pole in the new location on the wetland (East) side of the 7- mile levy road. All digging would occur with an archaeologist or archaeology technician on site to monitor the excavation for cultural resources. Purpose and Need for the Project: The current platform is used annually by osprey, however, the nest is rarely successful. It is suspected that administrative visits to the wetland pump station and points north during the breeding season result in the female leaving the nest for periods of time long enough to fatally chill the eggs. Moving the pole/platform to a more remote area of the wetland will reduce breeding season disturbance and is expected to increase reproductive success of the osprey on the Wetland. Proposed Implementation: This project is expected to be implemented in the fall or early winter of 2008, and is expected to last 1 day.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Big Wood River Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR BIG WOOD RIVER BASIN WETLANDS by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center June 1997 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Stephen P. Mealey, Director Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD990484-01-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................i LIST OF FIGURES........................................................ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ii LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................iii SUMMARY.............................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...................................................iv INTRODUCTION ........................................................1 SURVEY AREA .........................................................2 STATUS OF WETLANDS..................................................3 National Wetlands Inventory...............................................3 Wetland Acreage ......................................................4 Wetland Types........................................................5 Wetland Ownership and Protected Status....................................7 Wetland Condition.......................................................10 Wetland Losses .......................................................10 Functional Shifts......................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Record for Wood River Wetland Plan
    Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Record for Wood River Wetland Plan BLM Office: Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview District (OR-014) Subject Planning Documents: Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (BLM/OR/WA/PL-96/010+1792); and Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement (BLM/OR/WA/PL- 95/030+1792); Klamath Falls Resource Area Plan Conformance Compliance Record 7/09/1997. Proposed Action Title/Type: Wood River Channel Restoration Project Location of Proposed Action: Lower .6 miles of Wood River. The project area includes portions of Township 34 South, Range 7 ½ East, Sections 36, approximately 25 miles north of Klamath Falls, Oregon, in Klamath County. Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action is to conduct an extension of the restoration work in the Wood River Channel involving instream work per Oregon Trout proposal dated May 5, 1997 (available for review in Klamath Falls BLM office). In the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement, this work was identified as part of Alternatives B and C, for that portion of the river between the confluence of Crooked Creek and the bridge near Agency Lake. Engineering feasibility studies completed since the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) indicate that the proposal for stream channel restoration in Alternative D would be very costly without any guarantee of producing the desired results or meeting the stated plan objectives. Studies completed by a contractor for Oregon Trout, Inc. (available for inspection in the Klamath Falls Resource Area Office during normal working hours) now indicate that the stream channel restoration approach to re-establishing the historic meanders of the Wood River channel through its historic delta form is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River CEAP Final Report
    Wood River, Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon Conservation Effects Assessment Project Special Emphasis Watershed Final Report April 2010 Overview of the Wood River Valley in Oregon Prepared by the Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call Wood River CEAP 5/4/2010 i (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Foreword The Wood River CEAP study was initiated as a special emphasis watershed project in 2005 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) through the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). CEAP began in 2003 as a multi-agency effort to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practices used by private landowners participating in selected United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs. Funding from CEAP has provided a unique opportunity to address current issues in the Wood River Watershed while also providing insights into the methodologies that can be used to measure the effectiveness of conservation in similar watersheds throughout the western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Ditch Fish Screen
    Wood River Ditch Fish Screen State(s): Oregon Managing Agency/Organization: Trout Unlimited Type of Organization: Nonprofit Project Status: Underway Project type: WNTI Project Project action(s): : Fish passage, Riparian or Instream Habitat Restoration Trout species benefitted: Interior Redband Trout Population: Wood River, upper Klamath Basin Project summary: The Wood River Ditch (WRD), Klamath County, Oregon, provides 30 cubic feet per second (CFS) of water delivery to irrigate approximately 2,175 acres in the Wood River valley. Three conventional, fixed-speed irrigation pumps provide water from the Wood River to the WRD. A rotary drum fish screen was installed at the point of diversion on the right bank of the Wood River by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in 1997; however, the fish screen is in disrepair and no longer prevents native fish, including Redband Trout from becoming entrained in the ditch. In 2016 and 2017, ODFW personnel collected over 400 age-0 and age-1 Redband Trout in the ditch. Furthermore, the point of diversion is located immediately downstream of most Redband Trout spawning habitat in the Wood River. Trout Unlimited (TU) is working with the water users, the landowner, ODFW, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Forest Service to address these issues. The goal of this project is to eliminate entrainment of native fishes while ensuring water delivery by installing a functioning fish screen and energy efficient irrigation pumps. This project represents an important step in protecting Redband Trout populations in the upper Klamath basin (UKB), reducing energy demand and water withdrawals, establishing collaborative and conservation- focused partnerships with private landowners and water users, and builds upon recent restoration efforts in the Wood River watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood River Wetlands
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Lakeview District Offce IN REPLY REFER TO: P.O. Box 151 (1000 Ninth Street S.) Lakeview, Oregon 97630 1617(014) Dear Reader: This is a consolidated document which includes the Record of Decision (ROD), and Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Resource Management Plan (RMP). This plan was approved by the Oregon/Washington State Director in November 1995. The ROD approves the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) decisions for managing 3,220 acres in Klamath County, Oregon. The Record of Decision was prepared in conformance with 40 CFR 1505.2, which requires a concise document which links the manager's decision to the analysis presented in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), dated July 1995. The ROD shows bow environmental impacts and other factors were considered in the decision-making process. The ROD documents approval and adoption of the proposed Resource Management Plan, as described in the Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement. Minor differences from the FEIS, points of clarification and management direction have been incorporated in response to both public comment on the FEIS as well as on-going staff review. It should be noted that there were no protests on the proposed Upper Klamath Basin and Wood River Wetland RMP/FEIS. In addition, the Governor of Oregon was provided a formal opportunity to review the proposed plan for conformance with officially approved or adopted natural resource-related plans, programs, or policies of the state or local governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Resident bull trout at Dixon Creek. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office Klamath Falls, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. B-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ...................................................... B-3 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ..................................................... B-7 Ongoing Klamath Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ................................... B-10 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...................................................................................... B-12 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... B-15 Implementation Schedule for the Klamath Recovery Unit ....................................................... B-24 References ................................................................................................................................. B-30 Appendix I. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for the Klamath Recovery Unit ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]