DOCSLIB.ORG

(28 July - 8 August 2022) NOMINATION CRITERIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(28 July - 8 August 2022) NOMINATION CRITERIA BIRMINGHAM 2022 COMMONWEALTH GAMES (28 July - 8 August 2022) NOMINATION CRITERIA Note: Unless specified, when referencing the word ‘athlete/s’, this applies to both able-bodied and Para-athletes. 1. NOMINATION/SELECTION PHILOSOPHY 1.1 The New Zealand Olympic Committee’s (“NZOC”) Selection Policy - Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games ("Selection Policy”) sets out the criteria that applies for the selection of athletes by the NZOC to compete at the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (“2022 CG”). 1.2 This Nomination Criteria is issued by the Board of Athletics New Zealand (“Athletics NZ Board”) and sets out the basis on which Athletics New Zealand’s (“Athletics NZ”) Nomination Panel will consider athletes for nomination to the NZOC Selection Panel to be considered for selection in the team to compete at the 2022 CG. 1.3 In the event there is any inconsistency between this Nomination Criteria and the NZOC Selection Policy, the NZOC Selection Policy shall prevail. This Nomination Criteria shall take effect from 24 August 2021. 1.4 The 2022 CG is an Athletics NZ “Black” Singlet competition (i.e. an Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, senior WA/WPA Track & Field World Championships or a Commonwealth Games). 1.5 Quota allocation: The maximum number of able-bodied athletes that Athletics NZ can initially nominate to attend the 2022 CG events will be limited to the number of quota places allocated to Athletics NZ by the NZOC. The initial number of able-bodied quota places allocated to Athletics NZ is 18. Athletes selected for Relay teams must be included in this figure. a) For able bodied athletes, quota places are allocated to Athletics NZ, not to any individual athlete or relay team. b) Additional able-bodied quota places may also be available at the sole discretion of the NZOC through the redistribution of unused NZOC quota places and/or additional quota places offered to the NZOC by the Commonwealth Games Federation (“Reallocation Process”), if any. This Reallocation Process will take place before 20 June 2022. There is no guarantee that Athletics NZ will be allocated any additional places as a result of any Reallocation Process. c) For Para-athletes, a quota place is allocated to Athletics NZ for a specific athlete and is not transferable to another NZ athlete in accordance with the 2022 Birmingham Games Athlete Allocation System for Para-Athletics for the Games. d) Quota places for each Para-athlete event will be allocated to the seven highest World Para Athletics (WPA) ranked athletes from Commonwealth countries in 2021. Allocation of a quota place does not guarantee that the Para-athlete will be nominated or selected to compete at the 2022 CG. e) Non-travelling reserve athletes may be nominated in accordance with this Nomination Criteria. However, non-travelling reserves may only be nominated for DOC EXPIRES: 29 August 2022 Page 1 of 18 the initial able-bodied allocation places. No reserves can be nominated under any Reallocation Process. 2. NOMINATION PANEL 2.1 The Athletics NZ Board endorsed Nomination Panel and the Convenor appointed to nominate athletes to the NZOC for the 2022 CG are yet to be named. This update will be made by December 2021 and published on the Athletics NZ website. 3. CONDITIONS OF NOMINATION 3.1 As a condition of nomination for the 2022 CG, an athlete must: a) Be a registered member of Athletics NZ at the time of achieving an Athletics NZ 2022 CG Performance Standard (as set out in Schedule 2) within the relevant 2022 CG Qualification Period (as set out in clause 4.1). b) Have submitted their intent to apply for nomination for the 2022 CG to Athletics New Zealand if they were not a registered member of Athletics New Zealand, no later than 5pm Sunday 27 June 2021; AND c) Have submitted an Application for the NZOC Long List on the Athletics NZ website: i. By 5pm Friday 24 September 2021; OR: ii. In exceptional circumstances where Athletics NZ provides the NZOC with evidence that demonstrates an athlete could not have been reasonably in contention for inclusion on the Long List before 5pm Friday 24 September 2021, an athlete can be added up to 5pm Friday 28 January 2022 (or such extended date as agreed by the NZOC Board), provided the athlete has been a registered member of Athletics NZ since Friday 26 November 2021; AND d) Be eligible to complete, and have completed, the NZOC 2022 CG Athlete Application Form in full and submitted that form to NZOC: i. No later than 5pm Wednesday 28 July 2021 if the athlete is not a registered member of Athletics NZ as at Sunday 27 June 2021; OR ii. No later than 5pm Friday 26 November 2021 if the athlete was a registered member as at Sunday 27 June 2021; OR iii. As a late addition to the Long List in accordance with clause 3.1c), by 5pm Friday 28 January 2022 (or such extended date as agreed by the NZOC Board); AND e) Have competed at the relevant Compulsory Nomination Trial/s in the event/s they are seeking selection, OR i. Have been granted dispensation from the relevant Compulsory Nomination Trials (as set out in clauses 6.5 and 6.6), noting there is no Compulsory Nomination Trial for marathon events; OR ii. Have received medical exemption from the relevant Compulsory Nomination Trials as a result of injury or illness that occurred during the competition, or during the seven days before the competition, that can be verified by the provision of a medical certificate (as set out in clauses 6.7 and 6.8); AND DOC EXPIRES: 29 August 2022 Page 2 of 18 f) Have signed the NZOC 2022 CG Athlete Agreement on or before the Nomination Date; AND g) Complied with all Commonwealth Games Federation eligibility, nationality and participation requirements; AND h) Be and remain in “good standing” with Athletics NZ and the NZOC and, at all times, comply with any established code of conduct or athlete agreement of the NZOC and otherwise conduct themselves in a way that does not bring their sport or the 2022 CG team into disrepute; AND i) Not have: i. Used or administered any substance, which, if it had been detected as being present in the athlete’s body tissue or fluids, would have constituted doping OR; ii. Used any prohibited method or committed any other doping offence as defined in Athletics NZ Integrity Regulations, NZOC’s Integrity Regulations, World Athletics (“WA”) Anti-Doping Regulations or WA Integrity Regulations; AND j) Agree that they are required to receive approval from the 2022 CG Team Leader before they compete in any event exceeding 10km after Sunday 29 May 2022. k) Athletes must be prepared to show evidence of satisfactory vaccination to any infectious diseases (including Covid-19) as required by the Athletics NZ medical team prior to coming into the ANZ-HP Village Pre-entry Camp and/or Village. In the absence of proof of vaccination or immunity, athletes will be required to undertake said vaccinations unless there is a medical contraindication, or an exemption is provided by Athletics NZ. a. Note: Athletes should be aware that failure to comply with any of the requirements set out in clause 3.1 may render an athlete ineligible for nomination or selection. 3.2 In addition to the above, Para-athletes must also: a) Have satisfied all International Paralympic Committee (“IPC”) and World Para Athletics (“WPA”) eligibility, age and participation requirements; AND b) Hold a WPA Classification (Review or Confirmed) as per the WPA Classification Masterlist with a fixed review date of 2023 or later as at 29 June 2022; AND c) Hold an active WPA Athlete License at the time of achieving a Performance Standard that is listed on the WPA World Ranking Database within the relevant Athletics NZ 2022 CG Qualification Period and for the 2022 season; AND d) Have achieved a valid result in at least one (1) World Para Athletics Recognised Competition within 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2021 (in accordance with the IPC Athlete Licensing Programme Policies valid for the 2020-2021 seasons) in the event(s) in which they intend to compete in. 4. NOMINATION CONSIDERATIONS Qualification Periods 4.1 Performance Standards must be achieved and listed on the Athletics NZ Rankings website within the following Athletics NZ 2022 CGs Qualification Periods. DOC EXPIRES: 29 August 2022 Page 3 of 18 Events Athletics NZ 2022 CGs Qualification Periods All able-bodied events 1 January 2021 – 1 May 2022 Para-athlete events 1 January 2021 – 31 December 2021 Para-athlete Individual Events 4.2 On or before the Nomination Date for Para-athletes (as set on in clause 7.6), subject to receiving a quota place by name from World Para Athletics, Athletics NZ will nominate for consideration for selection by the NZOC, in the following order of ranking; a) Para-athletes that have achieved two ANZ-A Performance Standards during the Qualification Period; OR b) Para-athletes, that have achieved one ANZ-A Performance Standard and one ANZ-B Performance Standard during the Qualification Period; OR c) Para-athletes that have achieved two ANZ-B Performance Standards during the Qualification Period. b. Able-Bodied Events (Individual & Relay Teams) 4.3 In determining whether or not to nominate up to 18 athletes (including any Relay teams) or non-travelling reserves to the NZOC for consideration of selection, the Nomination Panel must apply the following criteria in order of priority: a) Individual athletes in field events and track events up to and including 5,000m in distance that have achieved two ANZ-A Performance Standards at different meets, including one when winning (or being the first placed New Zealand athlete) in the event/s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explanatory Report
    Explanatory Report Author: Alexander Picolin, IPC Database Development Manager Date: 13/03/2014 Topic: IPC Athletics Raza Point Score System – Review 2014 Historical consideration The Raza point score table has been launched in March 2010 for IPC Athletics combined field events that allows converting class dependent performances into points for direct comparison. The previous system had only considered the best performance of the last Paralympic Games (1st PG) and best two performances World Championships (1st and 2nd WCH) as well as the actual World Record (WR). Following formula applied: WR + 1st PG + 1st WCH + 2nd WCH = 1000 points ref 4 푥̅ ∝ Performance Points = 1000 ref ⇒ ∙ 푥̅ Outstanding world record performances or underperformed events at world championships had a major effect on this reference mark ref so that some classes got (dis)advantages. In less populated classes which were not offered on the events programme of the last edition of the 푥̅ Paralympic Games or world championships, even less values were used to determine ref , in a few cases this reference value just equalled the actual world record performance. 푥̅ International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel. +49 228 2097-200 www.paralympic.org 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax +49 228 2097-209 [email protected] Raza point score system As it had been outlined, the previous model was inappropriate so that an IPC Athletics working group was reviewing various recommendations brought in by the group members. That model being the most recommendable across the proposals was designed by Masoom Raza from UK Athletics and is based on the following statistical analysis1 o Data from Paralympic Games and World Championships from 2000 and onwards has been used as the basic platform.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Para Throws Coaching Manual
    Para Throws Coaching Manual A Technical Guide for Coaching Athletes with a Disability in Para Throws Acknowledgments LEAD PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS Ken Hall, ChPC – Former National Team Para Throws Coach, Athletics Canada and current Provincial Para Throws Coach, Ontario CP Sports Association and Cruisers Sports for the Physically Disabled Lisa Myers – Program Manager and Provincial Seated Throws Coach, BC Wheelchair Sports Association ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORS Kim Cousins, ChPC – Paralympic Next Gen Manager and National Team Coach, Athletics Canada Jennifer Schutz, ChPC – Coaching Education Coordinator, BC Athletics PHOTOS Photos included throughout this manual are provided by: Rita Davidson Sue Furey Gerry Kripps Paul Lengyell BC Wheelchair Sports Association would like to thank the Government of Canada, Province of British Columbia, and viaSport for their generous support in the production of this manual. © 2017 BC Wheelchair Sports Association | Para Throws Coaching Manual 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................4 What is Para Throws? .............................................................................................................................................4 Classification ...............................................................................................................................................................4 Characteristics of Disability Groups ............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Athletics Technical Rules Review Process
    WORLD PARA ATHLETICS TECHNICAL RULES REVIEW PROCESS Approved Amendments - January 2020 Page Rule Action Current Amended Text(bold) Rationale PART A – GENERAL PART A – GENERAL 8 Part A Amend IAAF: the International Athletics Association IAAF World Athletics: formerly known as the The amendment provides consistency with the delete and Federation (IAAF). International Athletics Association Federation (IAAF). approved rebranding of the IAAF to World Athletics add (June 2019) IAAF Rules: the International Athletics Association IAAF World Athletics Rules: formerly known as the Federation Competition Rules. International Athletics Association Federation Competition Rules. 9 Part A Amend No definition currently. Orthosis: an orthopaedic appliance or apparatus used To include (for consistency) the definition of (add) to assist functioning in a limb that is anatomically orthosis as defined in the WPA Classification Rules intact but which has impaired range of movement, and Regulations. muscle power or leg length difference. 9 Part A Amend No definition currently. Prosthesis: An artificial device that replaces a missing To include (for consistency) the definition of (add) body part, which may be lost through trauma, disease, prosthesis as defined in WPA Classification Rules or congenital conditions. and Regulations. PART B – WORLD PARA ATHLETICS PART B – WORLD PARA ATHLETICS REGULATIONS REGULATIONS 14 Regulatio Amend 3.3 Competition requirements 3.3 Competition requirements To reflect the fact that WPA does not publish the n organisational requirements or the competition 3.3 3.3.1 The organisational requirements and fees on its website. competition fees for each level of World Para 3.3.1 The organisational requirements and competition Athletics Recognised Competitions (excluding IPC fees for each level of World Para Athletics Recognised Games) are outlined on the World Para Athletics Competitions (excluding IPC Games) are outlined on website.
    [Show full text]
  • Student's Dropout Risk Assessment in Undergraduate Course At
    Student’s Dropout Risk Assessment in Undergraduate Course at Residential University Sweta Rai Banasthali Univeristy 1 | P a g e ABSTRACT Student dropout prediction is an indispensable for numerous intelligent systems to measure the education system and success rate of any university as well as throughout the university in the world. Therefore, it becomes essential to develop efficient methods for prediction of the students at risk of dropping out, enabling the adoption of proactive process to minimize the situation. Thus, this research work propose a prototype machine learning tool which can automatically recognize whether the student will continue their study or drop their study using classification technique based on decision tree and extract hidden information from large data about what factors are responsible for dropout student. Further the contribution of factors responsible for dropout risk was studied using discriminant analysis and to extract interesting correlations, frequent patterns, associations or casual structures among significant datasets, Association rule mining was applied. In this study, the descriptive statistics analysis was carried out to measure the quality of data using SPSS 20.0 statistical software and application of decision tree and association rule were carried out by using WEKA data mining tool. Based on the application of association rule, the highest support value 0.68 was recorded for dropout mainly because of the personal problem. On the other hand ID3 decision tree algorithm was found best classifier with 98% accuracy whereas, discriminant function analysis correctly classified 99.1% of original grouped cases and 98.6% of cross-validated grouped cases. The main reason recorded for dropout of students at this residential university were personal factor ( illness & homesickness), Educational factors (learning problems & difficult courses, change of Institution with present goal and low placement rate) and institutional factors (campus environment, too many rules in hostel life and poor entertainment facilities).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Sports-Specific Classification for Paralympic Skiers with Visual Impairment
    Development of sports-specific classification for Paralympic skiers with visual impairment by Amritha Stalin A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Vision Science Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2020 ©Amritha Stalin 2020 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Alex Bowers Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School Supervisor Kristine Dalton Associate Professor, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo Internal Examiners Benjamin Thompson Professor, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo Susan Leat Professor, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo Internal-External Examiner James Danckert Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo ii Author's Declaration This thesis consists of material all of which I authored or co-authored: see Statement of Contributions included in the thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Statement of Contributions Amritha Stalin was the sole author of all the first drafts of the Chapters and Appendices in this thesis, which were written under the supervision of Dr. Kristine Dalton. This thesis consists of five Chapters, which describe all of the studies conducted towards developing evidence-based classification systems for Para nordic and Para alpine skiers under the supervision of Dr. Kristine Dalton. Chapter 2 was a manuscript written for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 11 IPC Athletics Rules and Regulations 2014-2015.Indd
    IPC ATHLETICS International Paralympic Committee Athletics Rules and Regulations 2014-2015 January 2014 O cial IPC Athletics Partner www.paralympic.org/athletics @IPCAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /IPCAthletics Recognition Page IPC Athletics.indd 1 11/12/2013 10:12:43 Changes to these Rules and Regulations Please note that these rules may be changed at any time as a result, for example, of changes in the IAAF rules, or classification related matter or where IPC Athletics otherwise considers it necessary to do so. IPC ATHLETICS CLASSIFICATION RULES AND REGULATIONS The IPC Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations are integral part of these Rules and Regulations, available at http://www.paralympic.org/Athletics/Rulesandregulations/Classification Athletics Rules and Regulations 2014-2015 1 PART 1 – IPC ATHLETICS REGULATIONS ............................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1 – IPC ATHLETICS RECOGNISED COMPETITIONS ................................................ 7 1.1 IPC Athletics Recognised Competitions ...................................................................... 7 1.2 Application of the IPC Athletics Rules and Regulations ............................................... 7 1.3 IPC Athletics Recognised Competitions Requirements ................................................ 7 1.4 Recognition of Competition Results ............................................................................ 7 1.5 Advertising and Displays during IPC Athletics Recognised Competitions ....................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Indonesia Asian Para Games Qualification Guideline
    2018 Indonesia Asian Para Games Qualification Guideline Version 1, Published: 02 February 2018 Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 QUALIFICATION METHODS ................................................................................................. 5 INDONESIA 2018 ASIAN PARA GAMES SPORTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ..................................... 6 Athletes and Medal Event Quotas ..................................................................................... 6 General APC Regulations on Eligibility ............................................................................... 7 APC Membership ............................................................................................................ 7 Compliance with APC Athletes Nationality Code ................................................................. 7 Minimum Age Requirement ............................................................................................. 7 Understanding and Agreeing to the Eligibility Code ............................................................ 7 NPC Selection Standards ................................................................................................ 8 Classification Eligability Regulations (Sport Class Status) .................................................... 8 Viability Criteria ............................................................................................................. 9 Bipartite Invitations ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Selected Phonetic Aspects in 'Hie
    EFFECTS OF SELECTED PHONETIC ASPECTS IN 'HIE TRANSMISSION OF THE SPANISH LANGUAGE DISSERTATION Presentod in Partial Fulfillment of tho Requirement* for tho Dogroe Doctor of Philosophy in tho Graduate School of The Ohio State University Dy CRUZ AURELIA CANCEL FERRER HARDIGREE, D.A., M.S. Tho Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: 7 Adviser / Department of Speech TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION............... 1 The Spanish Language in America ................ 1 General Characteristics and Minor Variations Among Spanish-Americans.............. 0 General Characteristics . ................ 9 S e s e o ................................. g Y e f s m o .............................. 10 Minor Variations .... ....... ...... 12 Orthographio ® > [s] .................... 12 Ceceo . 12 Orthographic x > C3 3, Cs3, Cg*3» Cko3 . 13 Orthographic r and rr> [r3 [ r ] ......... 14 Orthographic d > [ d 3 ....... ,. .......... 15 V o w e l s ......... 16 Orthographic-Phonetic Sound System ............. 17 Orthographio-Phonetic Units ................ 17 Consonants ..... ...... 17 V o w e l s ............................... 20 D i p h t h o n g s ........................... 22 S u m mary.................................... 23 II. PURPOSE AND R A T I O N A L E ............................ 25 III. REVIEW OF JEHEILITERATURE.......................... 28 Tests Developed to Evaluate Equipment ........... 29 Bell Telephone Tests ........... 29 Harvard (Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory) Tests. 30 Spanish Test for Hearing A i d s ........... 32 Tests Developed to Evaluate Speakers and Listeners ................ .......... 33 Jones Enunciation Test .......... 33 Voice Communication Laboratory (Waco) Write-Down Lists ............ 33 Multiple-Choice Tests ..... ......... 34 Spanish Speech Reception Test ......... 35 Tests Developed to Study the M e s s a g e ........... 36 Intelligibility of Sounds ......... 36 Intelligibility of English Words ....... 37 Intelligibility of Spanish Words ......
    [Show full text]
  • London 2012 Explanatory Guide Athletics
    London 2012 Explanatory Guide Athletics About the Explanatory Guides The Explanatory Guides offer a detailed introduction to each sport at the London 2012 Paralympic Games, as well as providing information on a number of other key topics that may be of interest and importance to teams. Each guide is divided into several sections: – A general introduction to London and to the Games. – Sport-specific information on subjects such as the competition format and schedule, training and the qualification criteria. – General information covering accreditation, ticketing, accommodation, medical services and transport. – A directory, which contains contact details, maps and a daily competition schedule for all sports. All information contained in this Explanatory Guide was correct at the time of publication in August 2011. However, please note that these details may change between now and the Games. NPCs are advised to check the IPC website (www.paralympic.org) and LOCOG’s The Exchange (https://theexchange.london2012.com) for important updates on topics such as the qualification criteria and the competition schedule. Detailed Team Leaders’ Guides, covering Games-time plans for every Paralympic sport, will be sent to NPCs in July 2012. Introduction On behalf of LOCOG, I’m delighted to introduce this Explanatory Guide for the London 2012 Paralympic Games. This is the first time that the Explanatory Guides for a summer Games have been published and distributed in electronic-only form, a policy that supports our desire to stage the most sustainable Paralympic Games yet. LOCOG is putting sport at the heart of the London 2012 Games. As part of this promise, we’re aiming to provide teams and athletes with the best possible conditions to allow them to perform at their peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Athlete Allocation System Version 1: 05.06.2020
    Athlete Allocation System Version 1: 05.06.2020 2022 Commonwealth Games · Birmingham · 27 July – 7 August 2022 PARA ATHLETICS - World Para Athletics (WPA) The information in this Athlete Allocation System is accurate as at 05 June 2020 but remains subject to change. As a result of the unique and extenuating circumstances caused by COVID-19 and the subsequent impact on international sporting calendars, the CGF and World Para Athletics will be closely monitoring this Athlete Allocation System to determine if any changes are necessary. For the avoidance of doubt, the CGF and World Para Athletics reserve the right to amend this Athlete Allocation System in any manner, and in their sole and absolute discretion, should it be deemed necessary to ensure a fair qualification pathway for all Athletes. 1 OVERVIEW The Para Athletics Athlete Allocation System includes two (2) key methods of qualification: 1. World Para Athletics World Rankings (Ranking period 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2021) 2. Bipartite Invitation World Para Athletics and CGF Bipartite Invitation 2 MEDAL EVENTS (13) Men’s Medal Events (6) Eligible Sport Classes • 100m T38 • T37/38 • 1500m T54 • T53/54 • 100m T12 • T11/12 • 100m T47 • T45/46/47 • Discus F42-44/F61-64 • F42/43/44/F61/62/63/64 (Raza points) • Marathon T54* • T53/54 Women’s Medal Events (6) Eligible Sport Classes • 100m T38 • T37/38 • 1500m T54 • T53/54 • 100m T34* • T33/34 • Discus F42-44/F61-64 • F42/43/44/F61/62/63/64 (Raza points) • Shot Put F57 • F55/56/57 • Marathon T54* • T53/54 2022 Commonwealth Games · Birmingham · 27 July – 7 August 2022 1 PARA ATHLETICS - World Para Athletics (WPA) Athlete Allocation System Version 1: 05.06.2020 Mixed Medal Event (1) Eligible Sport Classes Team composition, running order and eligible Sport Classes for the 4x100m universal relay are stipulated as follows: • The relay team must include two (2) male and two (2) female eligible athletes.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualification Guideline 2018 Indonesia Asian Para Games
    Qualification Guideline 2018 Indonesia Asian Para Games Draft 30 March 2018 - Version 2 Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Structure of Sport-Specific Qualification Criteria .............................................................................. 4 QUALIFICATION METHODS ..................................................................................................................... 5 Questions and Updates ....................................................................................................................... 5 Official Language ................................................................................................................................. 5 Copyright (2018) .................................................................................................................................. 5 INDONESIA 2018 ASIAN PARA GAMES SPORTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ............................................... 6 Athletes and Medal Event Quotas ...................................................................................................... 6 General APC Regulations on Eligibility ............................................................................................... 7 APC Membership ................................................................................................................................. 7 Compliance with APC Athletes Nationality Code..............................................................................
    [Show full text]