Para Athletics Event Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disability Classification System
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso. -
Processing Framework and Match-Up Database MODIS Algorithm Version 3 By
Processing Framework and Match-up Database MODIS Algorithm Version 3 By Robert H. Evans University of Miami Miami, FL 33149-1098 April 30, 1999 Appendix 1 - ATBD A1.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................... 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 7 1.1 Algorithm and Product Identification........................................................................7 1.2 Algorithm Overview..........................................................................................7 1.3 Document Scope ..............................................................................................7 1.4 Applicable Documents and Publications .....................................................................7 2.0 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................... 7 2.1 Experimental Objective ......................................................................................7 2.2 Historical Perspective ........................................................................................8 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALGORITHM................................................................. 8 3.1 Introduction based on AVHRR-Oceans Pathfinder .........................................................8 Matchup Databases ..............................................................................................8 3.1.1 Global matchup databases............................................................................................................9 -
2019-08-03 Competition Schedule Nottwil 2019 V4.5.Xlsx
Competition Schedule Date Day Session Event Event Name Station Start 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:00 Women's Javelin F11-13, U20 Final 12 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:01 Women's Club Throw F31/32/51, U17 non-medal 11 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:01 Men's Club Throw F31/32/51, U20 non-medal 11 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:01 Women's Club Throw F31/32/51, U20 non-medal 11 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:25 Men's 800 m T35-38, U17 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:25 Men's 800 m T35-38, U20 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:36 Women's 800 m T35-38, U17 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:36 Women's 800 m T35-38, U20 Final T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 09:47 Men's Shot Put F40-41, U20 Final 13 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:10 Men's Javelin F42-46/61-64, U20 Final 12 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:11 Women's 200 m T33-34, U17 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:11 Women's 200 m T33-34, U20 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:21 Men's 200 m T33-34, U20 Final T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:21 Men's 200 m T33-34, U17 non-medal T 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:31 Women's Shot Put F40-41, U17 non-medal 13 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 10:31 Women's Shot Put F40-41, U20 Final 13 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:00 Women's Shot Put F32-34, U20 Victory Ceremony 30 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:04 Women's Javelin F11-13, U20 Victory Ceremony 30 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:10 Women's Shot Put F42-46/61-64, U17 Final 13 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:15 Men's Javelin F42-46/61-64, U17 Final 12 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:16 Women's 800 m T35-38, U20 Victory Ceremony 30 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:20 Men's Shot Put F40-41, U20 Victory Ceremony 30 04.08.2019 Sunday 6 11:30 -
PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx
Great Lakes Regional Games Classification Schedule for Athletes with a Physical Impairment Version 1.6 Athletes - Must present to the Classification Centre 15 minutes before the allocated time on the classification schedule. Must bring a passport or some other official form of identification to classification. Will be required to read and sign a classification release form prior to presenting to the classification panel. May be accompanied by one athlete representative and/or an interpreter. Must be appropriately dressed in their sport clothes including shorts under tracksuits and sport shoes. Must bring their track chairs, strapping etc that they will be using in competition, to the classification session. Must ensure their throwing frames are at the stadium for technical assessments if necessary. Classification Day 1 Date: 9 June 2016 Time Panel SDMS NPC Family Name First Name Gender Class In Status In CLASS OUT STATUS OUT 9:00 1 31066 USA Williams Taleah Female T46 New T47 Confirmed 2 31008 USA Croft Philip Male T54 Review T54 CRS 9:45 1 15912 USA Rigo Isaiah Male T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31016 USA Nelson Brian Male F37 New F37 Confirmed 10:30 1 31218 USA Beaudoin Margaret Female T37 New T37/F37 CNS 2 30821 USA Evans Frederick Male T34 Review F34 CRS 11:15 1 11241 USA Weber Amberlynn Female T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31330 USA Langi Siale Male F43 New F43 Confirmed 11:45 1 31098 USA Johnson Shayna Female T44 New T44 Confirmed 2 27200 USA Frederick Emily Female F40 New F40 Confirmed 12:15 1 Technical Assessments 2 13:00 Lunch 14:00 1 20880 USA -
Para Athletics Classification Are You, Or Do You Know Someone Who May Be, Interested in Para Athletics?
PARA ATHLETICS CLASSIFICATION ARE YOU, OR DO YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO MAY BE, INTERESTED IN PARA ATHLETICS? Classification determines who is eligible to compete in a Para sport and then groups the eligible athletes into sport classes according to their activity limitation in a certain sport or event. Athletes are classified as “T” (Track and Jump) or “F” (Field) based on which event they are competing in, followed by a number that represents impairment type and level of impairment. For example, T12. First Letter Represents: First Number Represents: Second Number Represents: T/F TRACK OR FIELD 1-6 IMPAIRMENT TYPE 1-8 DESCRIPTION OF IMPAIRMENT Typically T identifies a track 1 = Visual Impairment The number 1 through 8 specifies event and F for a field event. 2 = Intellectual Impairment the description of the impairment as There are certain exceptions 3 = Co-ordination Impairment per the classification rules (i.e. Long Jump is a T event) 4 = Upper Limb Deficiencies; Lower Limb Deficiencies without the use of prosthetic; short stature 5 = Impaired muscle power or range of movement 6 = Limb deficiencies with the use of prosthetic PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHORT STATURE F40 F41 IMPAIRED MUSCLE POWER AND/OR PASSIVE RANGE OF MOVEMENT T/F51 T/F52 T/F53 T/F54 F55 F56 F57 Athletes who compete seated LIMB DEFICIENCY T/F42 T/F43 T/F44 T/F62 T/F63 T/F64 T/F45 T/F46 T/47 Lower limb deficiency without Lower limb deficiency with Upper limb deficiency the use of a prosthetic the use of a prosthetic with or without the use of a prosthetic ATHLETES WITH ATHETOSIS, ATAXIA AND/OR -
VMAA-Performance-Sta
Revised June 18, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L. -
Section “F” – Para Athletes Championship Competition
Section “F” – Para Athletes Championship Competition These rules are to be read in conjunction with Section ”A" Competition General Rules, Section “B” – Track Events and Section “C” – Field Events. 1. Para Athletes 1.1 General Conditions i. Athletes with a disability qualifying in any able body event at the State Track & Field Championships will not be allowed to compete in the equivalent Para event conducted on the same program. ii. Implements shall comply with the specifications as defined by LANSW for Para events. iii. In Para field events only three trials will be allowed. iv. All LANSW and IAAF (where applicable) rules of competition shall apply except in the following instances. 1.2 Classification i. Athletes with a disability have to be formerly classified by a recognised organisation, prior to competing at the State Track & Field Championships. ii. Classification is a way of grouping athletes of similar function or ability for the purpose of competition. 1.3 Competition i. All events will be conducted as multi-disability events. Competitors will compete against a multi- disability standard (MDS) as determined by the Australian Paralympic Committee. Placings will be determined by the competitor’s time/distance calculated against a percentage of the multi-disability standard (MDS). ii. In all competitions involving throwing events athletes must use the implement weight specified for their classification/ age group, (refer Para Athletes Implement Specification Table). Note: At competition events where combined age group are conducted the competitor’s will throw the weight specified for their age group. This could result in different weight implements being used in the same event. -
Alpine Soil Bacterial Community and Environmental Filters Bahar Shahnavaz
Alpine soil bacterial community and environmental filters Bahar Shahnavaz To cite this version: Bahar Shahnavaz. Alpine soil bacterial community and environmental filters. Other [q-bio.OT]. Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I, 2009. English. tel-00515414 HAL Id: tel-00515414 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00515414 Submitted on 6 Sep 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE Pour l’obtention du titre de l'Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble 1 École Doctorale : Chimie et Sciences du Vivant Spécialité : Biodiversité, Écologie, Environnement Communautés bactériennes de sols alpins et filtres environnementaux Par Bahar SHAHNAVAZ Soutenue devant jury le 25 Septembre 2009 Composition du jury Dr. Thierry HEULIN Rapporteur Dr. Christian JEANTHON Rapporteur Dr. Sylvie NAZARET Examinateur Dr. Jean MARTIN Examinateur Dr. Yves JOUANNEAU Président du jury Dr. Roberto GEREMIA Directeur de thèse Thèse préparée au sien du Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA, UMR UJF- CNRS 5553) THÈSE Pour l’obtention du titre de Docteur de l’Université de Grenoble École Doctorale : Chimie et Sciences du Vivant Spécialité : Biodiversité, Écologie, Environnement Communautés bactériennes de sols alpins et filtres environnementaux Bahar SHAHNAVAZ Directeur : Roberto GEREMIA Soutenue devant jury le 25 Septembre 2009 Composition du jury Dr. -
View of the Algorithm Will Be Discussed Below to Summarize the Key Points of the Algorithm
EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Dissertation Submitted to The School of Engineering of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electro-Optics By Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain Dayton, Ohio May, 4242 EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan APPROVED BY: Imad Agha, Ph.D. Andrew Sarangan, Ph.D. Advisory Committee Chairman Committee Member Associate Professor, Department of Professor, Department of Physics, and, Department of Electro- Electro-Optics and Photonics Optics and Photonics Partha Banerjee, Ph.D. Michael Scalora, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Professor and Department Chair, Research Physicist, Charles M. Department of Electro-Optics and Bowden Research Facility, Photonics AMRDEC, US Army RDECOM Robert J. Wilkens, Ph.D., P.E. Eddy M. Rojas, Ph.D., M.A., P.E. Associate Dean for Research Dean, School of Engineering and Innovation Professor, School of Engineering ii © Copyright by Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain All rights reserved 4242 ABSTRACT EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Imad Agha Nonlinear electromagnetic radiation (second and third harmonic) from the metal-insulator and metal-insulator-metal structures were measured and compared against predictions from the hydrodynamic models of plasmonics. This model incorporated higher order terms stem- ming from electron tunneling and nonlocality. This study shows that, besides the linear optical parameter like permittivity, conductivity etc, changes in the nonlinear optical pa- rameters, namely, second and third order susceptibilities (χ(2) and χ(3), respectively) can also be used to probe and compare the higher-order terms of the hydrodynamic model of plasmonics. -
Petitioner's Exhibit 17
JURC PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 0.~~.....L--- Petitioner's Exhibit 17 7 TOWN OF CEDAR LAKE Preliminary Engineering Report Cedar Lake Water Utility System Improvements July 2020 Prepared by: !,?.!! !!e.!,~JI ~ •• !.'!!; ru.E.~~ ~ Ph: (219) 844 8680 • Fax: (219) 844 7754 · e-mail: [email protected] Your Vision • Our Focus Table of Contents 1. Project Location ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Current Needs ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Existing System ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.a. Distribution System ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.b. Supply System ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.c. Storage System ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.d. Treatment Systems ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.e. Document Needs ......................................................................................................................... -
Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations 2
IPC ATHLETICS International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classifi cation Rules and Regulations January 2016 O cial IPC Athletics Partner www.paralympic.org/athleticswww.ipc-athletics.org @IPCAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /IPCAthletics Recognition Page IPC Athletics.indd 1 11/12/2013 10:12:43 Purpose and Organisation of these Rules ................................................................................. 4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 Organisation ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Article One - Scope and Application .................................................................................. 6 International Classification ................................................................................................... 6 Interpretation, Commencement and Amendment ................................................................. 6 2 Article Two – Classification Personnel .............................................................................. 8 Classification Personnel ....................................................................................................... 8 Classifier Competencies, Qualifications and Responsibilities ................................................ 9 3 Article Three - Classification Panels ................................................................................ 11 4 Article Four -
Explanatory Report
Explanatory Report Author: Alexander Picolin, IPC Database Development Manager Date: 13/03/2014 Topic: IPC Athletics Raza Point Score System – Review 2014 Historical consideration The Raza point score table has been launched in March 2010 for IPC Athletics combined field events that allows converting class dependent performances into points for direct comparison. The previous system had only considered the best performance of the last Paralympic Games (1st PG) and best two performances World Championships (1st and 2nd WCH) as well as the actual World Record (WR). Following formula applied: WR + 1st PG + 1st WCH + 2nd WCH = 1000 points ref 4 푥̅ ∝ Performance Points = 1000 ref ⇒ ∙ 푥̅ Outstanding world record performances or underperformed events at world championships had a major effect on this reference mark ref so that some classes got (dis)advantages. In less populated classes which were not offered on the events programme of the last edition of the 푥̅ Paralympic Games or world championships, even less values were used to determine ref , in a few cases this reference value just equalled the actual world record performance. 푥̅ International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel. +49 228 2097-200 www.paralympic.org 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax +49 228 2097-209 [email protected] Raza point score system As it had been outlined, the previous model was inappropriate so that an IPC Athletics working group was reviewing various recommendations brought in by the group members. That model being the most recommendable across the proposals was designed by Masoom Raza from UK Athletics and is based on the following statistical analysis1 o Data from Paralympic Games and World Championships from 2000 and onwards has been used as the basic platform.