DOCSLIB.ORG

Petitioner's Exhibit 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petitioner's Exhibit 17 JURC PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 0.~~.....L--- Petitioner's Exhibit 17 7 TOWN OF CEDAR LAKE Preliminary Engineering Report Cedar Lake Water Utility System Improvements July 2020 Prepared by: !,?.!! !!e.!,~JI ~ •• !.'!!; ru.E.~~ ~ Ph: (219) 844 8680 • Fax: (219) 844 7754 · e-mail: [email protected] Your Vision • Our Focus Table of Contents 1. Project Location ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Current Needs ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Existing System ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.a. Distribution System ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.b. Supply System ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.c. Storage System ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.d. Treatment Systems ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.e. Document Needs .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Current Population ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Existing Consumption ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.a. Pumped vs. Sold ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.b. Estimated Public Water Use (Flushing, Fire Protection) ............................................................... 9 2.3.c. Percent Water Loss ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.d. Domestic, Commercial/ Industrial ............................................................................................... 9 2.3.e. Average Design Flow ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.f. Peak Design Flow .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.g. WTP Flow and Backwash Water ................................................................................................. 10 2.4. Current Significant Water Users ......................................................................................................... 10 2.5. Layouts and Site Maps ........................................................................................................................ 10 3. Future Needs ...............................................................................................................................................10 3.1. Population Growth .............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1.a. Census Data ................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1.b. Building Permits .......................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.c. Current Development Trends ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1.d. Future Significant Users .............................................................................................................. 11 3.2. 20-Year Design Flows .......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.a. West Side .................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.b. Eastside .......................................................................................................................................12 3.3. 20-Year System Needs ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.3.a. Westside ..................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.b. East Side ...................................................................................................................................... 12 4. Evaluation of Alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 13 P a g e I 1 of 22 I 4.1. Feasible alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.a. No Action ..................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.b. Optimum Operation of Existing Facility ...................................................................................... 13 4.1.c. Rehabilitation vs Replacement ................................................................................................... 13 4.1.d. Expansion/ Upgrade ................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.e. Water Loss ................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.f. Regionalization ............................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.g. Treatment Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 13 4.1.h. Sludge Handling .......................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.i. Discharge Options ....................................................................................................................... 14 4.2. Rational for Alternative Selected ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2.a. Monetary .................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.b. Technical ..................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.c. Reliability ..................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.d. Ability to Implement ................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.e. Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................... 14 5. Evaluation of Environmental lmpacts ......................................................................................................... 14 5.1. Proposed Project Site Drawings .......................................................................................................... 14 5.2. Environmental lmpact ......................................................................................................................... 14 5.2.a. Disturbed/Undisturbed Land ...................................................................................................... 14 5.2.b. Historic/Architectural Resources ................................................................................................ 15 5.2.c. Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 16 5.2.d. Surface Water ............................................................................................................................. 16 5.2.e. Ground Water ............................................................................................................................. 16 5.2.f. 100- Year Floodplain ................................................................................................................... 16 5.2.g. Plants and Animals ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.2.h. Farmland ..................................................................................................................................... 16 5.2.i. Air Quality ................................................................................................................................... 17 5.2.j. Open Space & Recreational Opportunities ................................................................................. 17 5.2.k. Lake Michigan Costa I Management Zone ................................................................................... 17 5.2.1. National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thursday, March 26, 2009
    I I I 2001 Perennial Initiation Point Project I Prepared By Eric Krausz, Ruby Peone, and Sondra Collins Timber, Fish, and Wildlife Biologists I Colville Confederated Tribes! Spokane Tribe oflndians I Introduction During the Forest and Fish discussions the default initiation point of perennial stream I flow was established for the eastern Washington watersheds at a basin area of 300 acres. This point would be used to delineate between the type 4!5 break under the present water typing system. Under the new water typing criteria this point will be used to determine I the upper most flow of type N (non-fish bearing) waters. Type N waters are further sub­ divided into two categories: perennial (Np) segments that do not dry up, and seasonal (Ns) segments that do become dry in a year of normal rainfall. Type Np streams require I partial forest buffering and other protections during forest practices (logging, road maintenance) not required for Ns streams. I I The Perennial Initiation Point (PIP) Pilot Project was created to collect baseline data supporting adaptive management related to water typing in headwater streams. The field sample protocol for this project was developed in order to identifY locations in streams I where continuous perennial flow and spatially intermittent perennial flow are found. In ( addition, the validity of the default 300-acre (eastern W A) basin area was to be tested, addressing one of the L-2 questions on CMER's priority list of unresolved issues. I Currently, the West-side default lies at 52 acres. However, Pre-200l PIP data collected from Hydrologist Curt Veldhuisen of the Skagit System suggested a much lower basin I size of 21 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx
    Great Lakes Regional Games Classification Schedule for Athletes with a Physical Impairment Version 1.6 Athletes - Must present to the Classification Centre 15 minutes before the allocated time on the classification schedule. Must bring a passport or some other official form of identification to classification. Will be required to read and sign a classification release form prior to presenting to the classification panel. May be accompanied by one athlete representative and/or an interpreter. Must be appropriately dressed in their sport clothes including shorts under tracksuits and sport shoes. Must bring their track chairs, strapping etc that they will be using in competition, to the classification session. Must ensure their throwing frames are at the stadium for technical assessments if necessary. Classification Day 1 Date: 9 June 2016 Time Panel SDMS NPC Family Name First Name Gender Class In Status In CLASS OUT STATUS OUT 9:00 1 31066 USA Williams Taleah Female T46 New T47 Confirmed 2 31008 USA Croft Philip Male T54 Review T54 CRS 9:45 1 15912 USA Rigo Isaiah Male T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31016 USA Nelson Brian Male F37 New F37 Confirmed 10:30 1 31218 USA Beaudoin Margaret Female T37 New T37/F37 CNS 2 30821 USA Evans Frederick Male T34 Review F34 CRS 11:15 1 11241 USA Weber Amberlynn Female T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31330 USA Langi Siale Male F43 New F43 Confirmed 11:45 1 31098 USA Johnson Shayna Female T44 New T44 Confirmed 2 27200 USA Frederick Emily Female F40 New F40 Confirmed 12:15 1 Technical Assessments 2 13:00 Lunch 14:00 1 20880 USA
    [Show full text]
  • VMAA-Performance-Sta
    Revised June 18, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Algorithm Will Be Discussed Below to Summarize the Key Points of the Algorithm
    EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Dissertation Submitted to The School of Engineering of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electro-Optics By Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain Dayton, Ohio May, 4242 EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan APPROVED BY: Imad Agha, Ph.D. Andrew Sarangan, Ph.D. Advisory Committee Chairman Committee Member Associate Professor, Department of Professor, Department of Physics, and, Department of Electro- Electro-Optics and Photonics Optics and Photonics Partha Banerjee, Ph.D. Michael Scalora, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Professor and Department Chair, Research Physicist, Charles M. Department of Electro-Optics and Bowden Research Facility, Photonics AMRDEC, US Army RDECOM Robert J. Wilkens, Ph.D., P.E. Eddy M. Rojas, Ph.D., M.A., P.E. Associate Dean for Research Dean, School of Engineering and Innovation Professor, School of Engineering ii © Copyright by Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain All rights reserved 4242 ABSTRACT EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Imad Agha Nonlinear electromagnetic radiation (second and third harmonic) from the metal-insulator and metal-insulator-metal structures were measured and compared against predictions from the hydrodynamic models of plasmonics. This model incorporated higher order terms stem- ming from electron tunneling and nonlocality. This study shows that, besides the linear optical parameter like permittivity, conductivity etc, changes in the nonlinear optical pa- rameters, namely, second and third order susceptibilities (χ(2) and χ(3), respectively) can also be used to probe and compare the higher-order terms of the hydrodynamic model of plasmonics.
    [Show full text]
  • Event Information
    46th NATIONAL INCLUSIVE ATHLETICS CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018 EVENT INFORMATION 1 INTRODUCTION The Singapore Disability Sports Council (SDSC) is pleased to invite all individuals, schools, associations and clubs to participate in the National Inclusive Athletics Championships on 20 and 28 April 2018. 1.1 Objectives: ● Creating opportunities for persons with disability to compete ● Recruiting potential newcomers to the national or national development squads ● Nominating athletes to represent Singapore at major/international competitions 1.2 This Entry Pack contains: ● Event Information ● Registration Form ● Registration for Classification Form ● Protest form 2 GENERAL INFORMATION 2.1 Field (Throws) & Long Jump Events Date: 20 April 2018 (Friday) Venue: Home of Athletics. 52 Stadium Road Singapore 397724 Time: 5:00 pm (Admission). 6:00 pm (Event Start) – 10:00 pm Division: Open Division - 15 years old and above (Born in 2003 or before) Track Events Date: 28 April 2018 (Saturday) Venue: MOE (Evans Road) Stadium. 21 Evans Road Singapore 259366 Time: 5:00 pm (Admission). 6:00 pm (Event Start) – 10:00 pm Division: Open Division - 15 years old and above (Born in 2003 or before) 2.2 Eligibility: - Singaporean or PR - With either Intellectual Impairment / Visual Impairment / Cerebral Palsy / Physical Impairment / Hearing Impairment - With a valid local or international classification status - Competent in their respective events and able to meet the Minimum Qualifying Standards (MQS) (See Annex A: Events & MQS Table) 2.3 Entry Fee: $10.00 per participant (Invoice will be issued upon registration, with payment instructions.) Page 1 of 12 46th NATIONAL INCLUSIVE ATHLETICS CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018 2.4 Registration 23rd March 2018 Deadline: Email completed forms to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations 2
    IPC ATHLETICS International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classifi cation Rules and Regulations January 2016 O cial IPC Athletics Partner www.paralympic.org/athleticswww.ipc-athletics.org @IPCAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /IPCAthletics Recognition Page IPC Athletics.indd 1 11/12/2013 10:12:43 Purpose and Organisation of these Rules ................................................................................. 4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 Organisation ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Article One - Scope and Application .................................................................................. 6 International Classification ................................................................................................... 6 Interpretation, Commencement and Amendment ................................................................. 6 2 Article Two – Classification Personnel .............................................................................. 8 Classification Personnel ....................................................................................................... 8 Classifier Competencies, Qualifications and Responsibilities ................................................ 9 3 Article Three - Classification Panels ................................................................................ 11 4 Article Four
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2017 1 Heading Headingcontents
    ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2017 NEW ZEALAND RIO 2016 PARALYMPIC GAMES TEAM OPENING CEREMONY PHOTO CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES PARALYMPICS NEW ZEALAND ANNUAL REPORT 2017 1 heading headingcontents 2 Officers and Officials 4 Chairman’s Report 6 Chief Executive’s Report 7 Governance Report 8 Commercial and Marketing Report 10 High Performance Report 11 High Performance Athlete Development Report 12 Community Development Report 14 Classification Report 16 Rio 2016 Paralympic Games 20 Future Paralympic Games 21 International Para Sport Results 22 Cyril Smith Legacy Fund Recipients 24 List of Paralympians 31 Financial Report 32 Directory and Statement of Compliance & Responsibility 33 Statement of Comprehensive Revenue & Expenses 34 Statement of Changes and Net Assets 35 Statement of Financial Position 36 Cash Flow Statement 37 Notes to the Accounts 45 Independent Auditor‘s Report 2 PARALYMPICS NEW ZEALAND ANNUAL REPORT 2017 officers & officials PNZ PATRON His Excellency LT GEN The Right Honourable Sir Jerry Mateparae (until August 2016) Her Excellency The Right Honourable Dame Patsy Reddy (from November 2016) PNZ BOARD Dr. Selwyn Maister QSM Ms. Catriona McBean Ms. Jana Rangooni (Chair) Mr. Mark Copeland Mr. Clive Power Ms. Jane Cotter (from February 2017) (until October 2016) Mr. Kagan Hindshaw (until Ms. Paula Tesoriero (MNZM) Mr. Duane Kale, ONZM October 2016, deceased) (from December 2016) PNZ ORDER Mr. J L McKie Mr. P Humphreys Mr. W F L Utley, OBE (deceased) OF MERIT MEMBERS Mr. J L H Savage, MBE Mr. D Kale, ONZM Mr. H J Pow (deceased) Mrs. K Condon Mr. T James Mr. P Holmes, CNZM (deceased) Mr. C Power Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Perennial Initiation Point Project
    I I I 2001 Perennial Initiation Point Project I Prepared By Eric Krausz, Ruby Pcone, and Sondra Collins Timber, Fish, and Wildlife Biologists I Colville Confederated Tribes/ Spokane Tribe oflndians I Introduction During the Forest and Fish discussions the default initiation point of perennial stream I flow was established for the eastern Washington watersheds at a basin area of 300 acres. This point would be used to delineate between the type 4/5 break under the present water typing system. Under the new water typing criteria this point will be used to determine I the upper most flow of type N (non-fish bearing) waters. Type N waters are further sub­ divided into two categories: perennial (Np) segments that do not dry up, and seasonal (Ns) segments that do become dry in a year of normal rainfall. Type Np streams require I partial forest buffering and other protections during forest practices (logging, road maintenance) not required for Ns streams. I I The Perennial Initiation Point (PIP) Pilot Project was created to collect baseline data supporting adaptive management related to water typing in headwater streams. The field sample protocol for this project was developed in order to identifY locations in streams I where continuous perennial flow and spatially intermittent perennial flow are found. In ' addition, the validity of the default 300-acre (eastern W A) basin area was to be tested, addressing one of the L-2 questions on CMER's priority list of unresolved issues. I Currently, the West-side default lies at 52 acres. However, Pre-2001 PIP data collected from Hydrologist Curt Veldhuisen of the Skagit System suggested a much lower basin I size of 21 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGNIFICANT INCIDENT SUMMARY BFC #11-179 11/28/2011 to 12/4/2011 LAFD Meeting Date: January 17, 2012 Emergency Public Information Center
    SIGNIFICANT INCIDENT SUMMARY BFC #11-179 11/28/2011 TO 12/4/2011 LAFD Meeting Date: January 17, 2012 Emergency Public Information Center INCIDENT DATE INC. TIME ADDRESS COUNCIL INCIDENT TYPE F.S. FIRE COMPANIES TOTAL F/F'S TOTAL R.A.S OUTSIDE AGENCIES F/F INJURIES CIV. FATALITY DOLLAR LOSS TIME TO CONTROL 11/29/2011 11:31 AM 6550 West 80th Street 11 Greater Alarm Structure Fire 005 9 57 3 0 0 $75000 0 hours, 35 min. F/F FATALITY INC. # Arson Fire CIV/INJURY INCIDENT DURATION Playa Del Rey 0482 0 3 2 hours, 55 min. ARSON STRIKES ORVILLE WRIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL PLAYA DEL REY - A malicious, intentionally set fire struck a local Middle School today, that significantly damaged school property and injured three. The Los Angeles Fire Department was called to 6550 West 80th Street for a reported "Rubbish Fire" at Orville Wright Middle School at 11:31 am on Tuesday, November 29, 2011. First on-scene resources found a freestanding structure on school grounds, with heavy fire showing. School administrators did evacuate the entire campus as a precaution, but not before three individuals (one student, two adults) were treated for smoke inhalation. One patient, an approximate 50 year old female, was transported to a local hospital in "fair" condition with non-life threatening injuries and an unknown, but related illness. The blaze was fully extinguished by 57 Firefighters in just 35 minutes. The LAFD's Arson-Counter-Terrorism Section was dispatched to the school, where they quickly determined this fire to have been "intentionally and maliciously set." Arson Investigators remained for several hours, processing the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Report
    World Para Athletics Classification Master List Summer Season 2017 Classification Report created by IPC Sport Data Management System Sport: Athletics | Season: Summer Season 2017 | Region: Oceania Region | NPC: Australia | Found Athletes: 114 Australia SDMS ID Family Name Given Name Gender Birth T Status F Status P Status Reason MASH 14982 Anderson Rae W 1997 T37 R F37 R-2024 10627 Arkley Natheniel M 1994 T54 C 33205 Ault-Connell Eliza W 1981 T54 C 1756 Ballard Angela W 1982 T53 C 26871 Barty Chris M 1988 T35 R F34 R MRR 1778 Beattie Carlee W 1982 T47 C F46 C 26763 Bertalli James M 1998 T37 R F37 R 17624 Blake Torita W 1995 T38 R-2022 32691 Bounty Daniel M 2001 T38 R-2022 13801 Burrows Thomas M 1990 T20 [TaR] R 29097 Byrt Eliesha W 1988 T20 [TaR] C 32689 Carr Blake M 1994 T20 [HozJ] C F20 N 10538 Carter Samuel M 1991 T54 C 1882 Cartwright Kelly W 1989 T63 C F63 C 29947 Charlton Julie W 1999 T54 C F57 C 1899 Chatman Aaron M 1987 T47 C 29944 Christiansen Mitchell M 1997 T37 R-2025 26224 Cleaver Erin W 2000 T38 R-2022 19971 Clifford Jaryd M 1999 T12 R-2023 F12 R-2023 29945 Colley Tamsin W 2002 T36 R-2023 F36 R-2020 1941 Colman Richard M 1984 T53 C 26990 Coop Brianna W 1998 T35 R-2022 19721 Copas Stacey W 1978 T51 R F52 C 32680 Crees Dayna W 2002 F34 R-2022 29973 Crombie Cameron M 1986 F38 R-2022 19964 Cronje Jessica W 1998 T37 R F37 R IPC Sport Data Management System Page 1 of 4 6 October 2021 at 07:08:42 CEST World Para Athletics Classification Master List Summer Season 2017 19546 Davidson Brayden M 1997 T36 R-2022 1978 Dawes Christie W
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 938 8:13 - 6-SEP-2007
    Userid: ________ DTD TIP04 Leadpct: 0% Pt. size: 7 ❏ Draft ❏ Ok to Print PAGER/SGML Fileid: D:\Users\4h5fb\documents\Epicfiles\P938QF4_2006a.sgm (Init. & date) Page 1 of 224 of Publication 938 8:13 - 6-SEP-2007 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Publication 938 Introduction (Rev. September 2007) This publication contains directories relating to Cat. No. 10647L Department real estate mortgage investment conduits of the (REMICs) and collateralized debt obligations Treasury (CDOs). The directory for each calendar quarter Real Estate is based on information submitted to the IRS Internal during that quarter. This publication is only avail- Revenue able on the Internet. Service Mortgage For each quarter, there is a directory of new REMICs and CDOs, and a section containing amended listings. You can use the directory to Investment find the representative of the REMIC or the is- suer of the CDO from whom you can request tax information. The amended listing section shows Conduits changes to previously listed REMICs and CDOs. The update for each calendar quarter will be added to this publication approximately six (REMICs) weeks after the end of the quarter. Other information. Publication 550, Invest- ment Income and Expenses, discusses the tax Reporting treatment that applies to holders of these invest- ment products. For other information about REMICs, see sections 860A through 860G of Information the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and any regu- lations issued under those sections. After 1995. After the November 1995 edi- (And Other tion, Publication 938 is only available electroni- cally.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Results Gridlines.Xlsx
    100 Meters T13 U14 Female 0:24.9 1 Sydney Parcell 100 Meters T34 U14 Male 1:23.0 1 Ronnie Dennis 100 Meters T34 U17 Female 0:26.6 1 Elicia Meairs 100 Meters T34 U11 Male 0:51.5 1 Sage Rovenstine 100 Meters T35 Adults Male 0:14.6 1 Dustin Gunter 100 Meters T35 U11 Male 0:29.8 1 Logan Bailon 100 Meters T36 Futures Female 0:39.6 1 Clover Hunding 100 Meters T36 U11 Female 0:28.5 1 Lily Idleman-Johnson 100 Meters T36 U11 Male 0:27.0 1 Jace Little 100 Meters T36 U11 Male 0:28.6 2 Ambrose Tran 100 Meters T36 U11 Male 0:33.3 3 Jacob Vansickle 100 Meters T36 U11 Male 0:38.7 4 Ty Creach 100 Meters T37 Adults Female 0:17.7 1 Kasey Nickel 100 Meters T37 Adults Female 0:19.0 2 Madison Castillo 100 Meters T37 Futures Male 0:34.0 1 Carson Carney 100 Meters T37 U11 Female 0:23.3 1 Tajah Goerage 100 Meters T37 U11 Male 0:27.4 2 Brant Hansen 100 Meters T37 U11 Male 0:33.1 1 Erick Lopez 100 Meters T37 U14 Female 0:18.5 1 Emily Pitzer 100 Meters T37 U14 Male 0:21.0 1 Carson Parrish 100 Meters T38 U14 Female 0:28.5 1 Ashtyn Rector 100 Meters T42 U11 Male 0:46.7 1 Isaac Tisdale 100 Meters T42 U14 Male 0:46.9 1 Tyler Lai 100 Meters T43 U14 Female 0:26.9 1 Makayla Wood 100 Meters T44 U11 Female 0:19.5 1 Alexis Martin 100 Meters T53 U11 Female 1:21.8 1 Olivia Woodard 100 Meters T53 U11 Male 0:52.1 1 Isaac Murdock 100 Meters T53 U17 Male 0:35.7 1 Loyale Massey 100 Meters T54 U11 Male 0:45.0 1 Davey Uria 100 Meters T54 U11 Male 0:45.3 2 Denis Lanning 100 Meters T54 U11 Male 1:18.2 3 Karter Gardenhire 100 Meters T54 U14 Female 0:36.0 1 Isabel Einwich 100 Meters T54
    [Show full text]