DOCSLIB.ORG

Insecticide Resistance in the Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea Saccharalis (F.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insecticide Resistance in the Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea Saccharalis (F.) Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Insecticide Resistance in the Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea Saccharalis (F.). Raghunath Prasad Yadav Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Yadav, Raghunath Prasad, "Insecticide Resistance in the Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea Saccharalis (F.)." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 965. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/965 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—13,278 microfilmed exactly as received YADAV, Raghunath Prasad, 1935- INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE IN THE SUGARCANE SORER, DIATRAEA SACCHARALIS (F.). Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1964 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE IN THE SUGARCANE BORER, DIATRAEA SACCHARALIS (F.) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Raghunath Prasad Yadav M.S., Govt. Agricultural College, Kanpur, 1958 May, 1964 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The writer is sincerely grateful to his major professor, Dr. W. H. Long, for many helpful suggestions and assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Special thanks are due Dr. L. D. Newsom, Head of the Department of Entomology, for providing the opportunity to study at Louisiana State University. The writer is also grateful to the members of his advisory committee, Dr. J. A. Davison, Dr. J. B. Graves, Dr. J. S. Roussel and Dr. W. T. Spink for their critism of this manuscript. Special thanks are due to Mr. E. J. Concienne, Mr. Melvin Kyle and Mr. Howard Anderson for their help in collecting insects from the field. Mr. Anderson also deserves credit for conducting the laboratory tests involving the insecticides endosulfan, guthion and carbaryl. The writer is also grateful to Mrs. Jeanette S. Turner for typing this dissertation. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................. 11 LIST OF TABLES»• • . • • * > . • • v LIST OF FIGURES .......... ix ABSTRACT • • • • • • • . • . • • x INTRODUCTION........................................................ 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .............................................. 3 Techniques for Testing Insecticides on Lepldopterous Insects. ....... 3 Insect Age and Stage of Development In Relation to Insecticide Susceptibility .... 8 Effects of Insecticides on Insects Surviving Treatment ........ 12 Resistance to Insecticides ....... 18 MATERIALS AND METHODS ......................................... 25 Sugarcane Borers ......... 25 Rearing Procedure ......... 26 Preparation of Diets ........ 27 Comparison of Diets. ........ 30 Insecticide Susceptibility Tests . 31 Insecticide-diet mixture ....... 31 Residual film ......... 32 Selection for Resistance. ....... 33 iii Page Cross Resistance . • . * . 3 3 Effects of Endrin on Borers Surviving Treatment . 34 RESULTS ........................................................... 37 Comparison of Diets. 3 7 Susceptibility of Different Borer Strains to Endrin . 3 7 Insecticider-diet mixture ....... 37 Residual film ......... 43 Selection for Resistance. ....... 47 Cross Resistance ......... 47 Effects of Endrin on Borers Surviving Treatment . 53 DISCUSSION ...................................................... 62 CONCLUSIONS ....................................... 67 SELECTED B I B L I O G R A P H Y ............................................ 69 APPENDIX.............................. 76 AUTOBIOGRAPHY ................................. 117 iv LIST OF TABLES Page I. Descriptions of artificial diets used to rear the sugarcane borer . 28 XIV. Development of the sugarcane borer on artificial diets, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63. .... 38 III. Susceptibility of mature or nearly mature field- collected sugarcane borer larvae to endrin in their diet, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August, 1963. 39 IV. Susceptibility of different strains of newly hatched sugarcane borer larvae to endrin in their diet, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63. 41 V. Susceptibility of different strains of 15-day-old- sugarcane borer larvae to endrin in their diet, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-November,, 1963. .... 44 VI. Susceptibility to endrin of newly hatched sugarcane borer larvae of different strains, residual film method, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63 .... 46 VII. Susceptibility to endrin of successive generations of newly hatched sugarcane borer larvae of the Franklin strain following selection by the residual film method at dosages of 0, 1 and 2 ug per flask, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-August, 1963 ......................... 48 VIII* Susceptibility of newly hatched sugarcane borer larvae of an endrin-susceptible And endrin-resistant strain to endosulfan, guthlon and carbaryl by the residual film method, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, October,^1963 . 49 IX. Weights of male and female sugarcane borer pupae following short contact exposures of Franklin strain larvae of the P, Fi and F2 generations to endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-August, 1963........................ 54 v ge Longevity, per cent mating and fecundity of sugarcane borer moths of the P and F£ gene­ rations following short contact exposure of Franklin strain larvae of the P, F^ and F£ generations to endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-August, 1963 ................................. 55 Weights of male and female sugarcane borer pupae reared from newly hatched larvae of the Erath and Franklin strains on a diet containing different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963. 57 Longevity, mating and fecundity of sugarcane borer moths reared from newly hatched larvae of the Erath and Franklin strains on a diet containing different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963 ................ 58 Effect of endrin on weights of surviving sugar­ cane borer pupae reared from 15-day-old larvae placed on diets containing different amounts of toxicant, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-May, 1963 59 Effect of endrin on mating and fecundity of sugarcane borers reared only on diets containing different amounts of the toxicant, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963........................ 61 Weights in mgs. of male and female sugarcane borer pupae reared from newly hatched larvae on 4 different artificial diets, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63. ..................................... 76 Duration in days of immature stages of the sugarcane borer reared on 4 different artificial diets, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63 • • 77 Mortality of newly hatched larve in tests with endrin-diet mixtures, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63........................................ 79 Mortality of 15-day-old larvae in tests with endrin-diet mixtures, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1963 . 82 Mortality of newly hatched larvae in tests using the residual film method, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1962-63............................................. 83 vi Page XX. Mortality of 3 successive generations of newly hatched larvae of the Franklin strain from different amounts of endrin in tests using the residual film method to select for endrin resistance, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Apr 11-August, 1963 .................................. 86 XXI. Mortality of newly hatched larvae of the Baton Rouge and. Port Allen strains in tests using the residual film method to determine susceptibility to endosulfan, guthion and carbaryl, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, October, 1963........................................... 88 XXII. Weights in mgs. of male and female sugarcane borer pupae of the first and last of 3 successive genera­ tions reared from newly hatched larvae which survived to different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-August,.1963 ..................................... 90 XXIII. Duration in days of the moths of the first and last of 3 successive generations reared from newly hatched larvae which were exposed to different amounts of endrin in residual film tests, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April- August, 1963....... ..................................... 92 XXIV. Records on mating, oviposition and egg viability for female moths from the first and last of 3 successive generations reared from newly hatched larvae which sur­ vived short contact exposure to different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-August, 1963 . 93 XXV. Weights of male and female pupae reared from newly hatched larvae on diets containing different amounts of - endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963 . .96 XXVI. Duration in days of moths reared from newly hatched larvae on diets containing different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963 .... 101 XXVII. Records on mating, oviposition and egg viability for female moths reared from newly hatched larvae on diets containing different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March-June, 1963 104 XXVIII. Weights of male and female pupae reared from 15-day-old larvae on diets containing different amounts of endrin, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April-May, 1963 .... 108 XXIX. Records on mating, oviposition and egg
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 19706697.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALITICA UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DETERMINACION DE HERBICIDAS N1TROFENOLES Y S-TRIAZINAS POR VOLTAMPEROMETRIA DE ADSORCION-REDISOLUCION Directores: Fi. Manuel de Villena Rueda J.M. Pingarrón Carrazón MARíA PEDRERO MUÑOZ MADRID, 1993 Ciudad Universitaria 28040 Madrid (España) TeIéf. 394 43 31 Fax: 394 43 29 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALíTICA LUIS MARIA POLO DIEZ, CATEDRATICO Y DIRECTOR DE ESTE DEPARTAMENTO CERTIFICO: Que el presente trabajo, titulado “Determinación de herbicidas nitrofenoles y s-triazinas por valtamperometría de adsorción- redisolución”, ha sido realizado en este departamento por Dfia. MaríaPedrero Muflo;bajo la dirección del Dr. D. FranciscoJavier Manuel de Villena Rueda y del Dr. D. Jase Manuel Pingarrón Carrazón,ProfesoresTitulares de estedepartamento, constituyendo la Tesis Doctoral de su autora. Madrid, Junio 1993 A mis padres El presente trabajo ha sido realizado en el Departamento de Química Analítica de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid con la ayuda y colaboración de muchas personas. A todas ellas quiero expresar mi agradecimiento, en especial: Al Prof. Dr. Don Francisco Javier Manuel de Villena Rueda y al Prof. Dr. Don Jose Manuel Pm garrón Carrazón, sus directores, por su inestimable ayuda, dedicación y paciencia. Al Prof. Dr. Don Luis María Polo Diez, catedrático y director de este departamento, por haber puesto a mi disposición todos los medios necesarios para llevarlo a cabo. A las Lcdas. Dha. Victoria Calvo Baza, Dha. Paloma Soriano Gil-Albare- líos, Dha. Belén Casado Perdices y Dha. Rosa Alonso Velasco, por su generosa colaboración. Y a todas aquellas personas que de una manera u otra han contribuido a su realización, en especial a Dha.
    [Show full text]
  • Title <綜説>Insecticide-Resistance and Darwinism Author(S) BROWN
    Title <綜説>Insecticide-resistance and Darwinism Author(s) BROWN, A.W.A. Citation 防虫科学 (1957), 22(2): 277-282 Issue Date 1957-05-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/157282 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Insecticide-resistance and Darwinism. * A. W. A; BROWN (Professor and Head of the Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. Temporarily, Scientist (Biologist) of W. H. 0., Division of Environmental Sanita- tion). Received May 8, 1957. Botyu-Kagaku 22,277,1957. ' ' 48. *1m~lmmt±c9"?-! ='AA (!'J;m: rJJmWF 22, 282, 1957) Next summer, the International Congress of including Hikone in 1954. Zoology will 'meet in London to celebrate the The housefly has also developed resistance to centenary of"The Origin of Species," and to other insecticides, which like DDT are in the class honour its author Charles Robert Darwin. Darwin known as chlorinated' hydrocarbons, In 1949, stated, 100 years ago, that it was natural selection, BHC-and dieldrin-resistance was reported in Cali­ operating on the normal variation of animals and fornia. Finally resistance has appeared to those plants which Over the course' of time separated insecticides which we at first thought never in­ the subspecies which,' he said, were the origin duce it, namely the organophosphorus compounds; of species. 'Vith that book he made his out­ it was reported from Denmark in 1955 that para­ standing contribution to the progress of science thion, diazinon and Resitox can no longer control and radically changed the thought of man. For houseflies there. proof, Darwin pointed not only to 'what could This resistance is not only confined to the be seen in different parts of the world, but also housefly.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Developed Insecticides for Pest Control
    Page 2 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE September, I947 Oil Fractions And Their Toxic Vewly Developed Leasing Of Farm Lands In State Effect On Plants When Used As 'nsecticides For Thought To Be At Low Point Now Weed Killing Sprays Explained 'esf Control But Increase Is Anticipated Robert L. Metcalf (Continued from page 1) Scientific research by commercial ownership from one generation of Rental arrangements need to be nd governmental interests has re- farmers to the next. re-examined annually. ulted in an unprecedented devel- Young farmers find it a way to Trends pment of new materials showing expand their operations and earnings New procedures need to be devel- reat promise as insecticides. Intelli- more rapidly than through owner- oped to facilitate the gradual passage .ent evaluation of their potentiali- ship. of a farm from owner to son or po- ies will offer big dividends in im- Truck and crop specialists may In contrast to sprays in water solu- condense later. Thus each batch of tential purchaser with little capital. roving the efficiency of present shift their operations more readily New forms of profit sharing and tion, oils wet plant surfaces readily crude oil contains some gasoline ay pest control practices. where they lease a large part of the and tend to spread as thin films and some stove oil, and some Diesel fuel partnership contracts for farm op- DDD or TDE land they farm. eration will supplement traditional run down the stems. They penetrated etc., and each fraction may be re- Rental Arrangements moved within its own boiling range DDD or TDE is 2,2-bis-(p-chloro- leasing practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Opis Patentowy 130618 Rzeczpospolita Lodowa
    POLSKA OPIS PATENTOWY 130618 RZECZPOSPOLITA LODOWA Patent dodatkowy do patentu nr — Zgłoszono: 82 06 25 (P. 237 107) Int. Cl8 A01N 57/10 Pierwszeństwof 81 06 27 Republika Federalna Niemiec URZĄD PATENTOWY Zgłoszenie ogłoszono: 83 02 28 PRL Opis patentowy opublikowano: .1987 10 15 Twórcy wynalazku: Miklos Ghyczy, Heinrich Osthoff, Eugen Etschen- berg Uprawniony z patentu: A. Nattermann und Cie GmbH, Kolonia (Republika Federalna Niemiec) Środek owadobójczy Przedmiotem wynalazku jest środek owadobój¬ kach o do 80%, gdy substancję owadobójczą lub czy. Na plantacjach roślin, liczne żyjące i ssące mieszaninę kilku substancji owadobójczych stosuje owady powodują poważne straty produkcyjne, się wespół z pewną substancją dodatkową będącą zwłaszcza w przypadku upraw bawełny, ryżu, zbóż, fosfolipidem. ziemniaków, owoców, warzyw i winorośli. Środek owadobójczy według wynalazku zawiera * Celem zwalczania owadów, podstawową sprawą jedną lub więcej substancji owadobójczych oraz jest obecnie stosowanie chemicznych środków owa¬ znane nośniki, rozcieńczalniki, rozpuszczalniki, pro- dobójczych. Niejednokrotnie konieczne jest stoso¬ pellenty yiub inne obojętne substancje pomocnicze, wanie chemicznych substancji owadobójczych w a cechą tego środka jest to, że zawiera jeden lub znacznych stężeniach, co w rezultacie staje się ło więcej fosfolipidów z grupy obejmującej fosfaty- źródłem toksycznych zanieczyszczeń otoczenia. Nie¬ dylocholinę, fosfatydyloetanoloaminę, N-acylofosfa- znaczna rozpuszczalność niektórych substancji owa¬ tydyloetanoloaminy, fosfatydyloinozyt, fosfatydylo- dobójczych, zwłaszcza w wodzie, powoduje ko¬ serynę, lizolecytynę, fosfatydyloglicerynę i uwodor¬ nieczność użycia toksycznych rozpuszczalników or¬ nione fosfatydylocholiny, przy czym stosunek wa¬ ganicznych. Ponadto większość chemicznych sub¬ 15 gowy substancji czynnej lub substancji czynnych stancji owadobójczych nie zawsze może wykazać do fosfolipidu lub fosfolipidów wynosi od 1 : 0,2 do swoją całkowitą aktywność, ponieważ nie wystar¬ 1 :20.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Potential POP and PBT Substances Development of a New Persistence/ Bioaccumulation Score
    Identifying potential POP and PBT substances Development of a new Persistence/ Bioaccumulation score Report 601356001/2011 E. Rorije et al. National Insitute for Public Health and the Environment P.O. Box 1 | 3720 BA Bilthoven www.rivm.com Identifying potential POP and PBT substances Development of a new Persistence/Bioaccumulation-score RIVM Report 601356001/2011 Page 1 of 86 RIVM Report 601356001 Colophon © RIVM 2011 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to the 'National Institute for Public Health and the Environment', along with the title and year of publication. E. Rorije (first author), SEC E.M.J. Verbruggen, SEC A. Hollander, LER T.P. Traas, SEC M.P.M. Janssen, SEC Contact: Martien Janssen RIVM/SEC [email protected] This investigation has been performed by order and for the account of I&M/RB, within the framework of Mondiaal Stoffenbeleid (M/601356) and REACH strategic support (M/601353) Page 2 of 86 RIVM Report 601356001 Abstract Identifying potential POP and PBT candidates Development of a new Persistence/Bioaccumulation score RIVM has screened the potential for long-term fate in the environment of a large number of substances. For this purpose a new methodology has been developed which indicates whether substances will persist in the environment and/or bioaccumulate in biological organisms. The results are a first step towards selection of substances which have inherent chemical properties that potentially make them a long-term hazard for the environment. Further research into the actual persistence and bioaccumulation of these substances in the environment will be needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bgbl. II Nr. 317/1998
    P. b. b. Erscheinungsort Wien, Verlagspostamt 1030 Wien 1617 BUNDESGESETZBLATT FÜR DIE REPUBLIK ÖSTERREICH Jahrgang 1998 Ausgegeben am 15. September 1998 Teil II 317. Verordnung: Giftliste-Verordnung 317. Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Frauenangelegenheiten und Verbraucher- schutz über die Bezeichnung von sehr giftigen und giftigen Stoffen in einer Giftliste (Giftliste-Verordnung) Auf Grund des § 36 des Chemikaliengesetzes 1996, BGBl. I Nr. 53/1997 (ChemG 1996), wird verordnet: § 1. Die im Abschnitt I des Anhanges enthaltenen Listen (Teil 1 und Teil 2) sehr giftiger und giftiger Stoffe werden als Giftliste kundgemacht. § 2. (1) Im Abschnitt II des Anhanges werden ergänzend Listen (Teil 1 und Teil 2) der gesundheits- schädlichen (mindergiftigen) Stoffe kundgemacht, die 1. nach den Bestimmungen des Chemikaliengesetzes (BGBl. Nr. 326/1987) bis 28. Februar 1997 zur Giftliste gemeldet oder als neuer Stoff gemeldet oder angemeldet oder 2. nach den Bestimmungen des Chemikaliengesetzes 1996 ab dem 1. März 1997 als neuer Stoff angemeldet wurden. (2) Soweit die Angaben im Abschnitt II des Anhanges nicht einer harmonisierten Einstufung laut Anhang I der Richtlinie 67/548/EWG in der geltenden Fassung entsprechen, geben sie lediglich die zum Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme dieser Stoffe in die Giftliste gültige Einstufung wieder und sind nicht ver- bindlich. § 3. Durch die Einstufung von Giften in der Giftliste werden die allgemeinen Sorgfalts-, Informa- tions- und Mitteilungspflichten gemäß § 19, die Nachforschungs- und Einstufungspflicht gemäß § 21, sowie die Verantwortlichkeit gemäß § 27 ChemG 1996 nicht berührt. § 4. (1) Diese Verordnung tritt mit dem ihrer Kundmachung folgenden Tag in Kraft. Gleichzeitig tritt die Giftliste-Verordnung, BGBl. Nr. 422/1995, außer Kraft. Stoffe und Zubereitungen, die hinsichtlich ihrer Einstufung und Kennzeichnung der Giftliste-Verordnung, BGBl.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinación De Herbicidas Nitrofenoles Y S-Triazinas Por Valtamperometría De Adsorción- Redisolución”, Ha Sido Realizado En Este Departamento Por Dfia
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALITICA UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DETERMINACION DE HERBICIDAS N1TROFENOLES Y S-TRIAZINAS POR VOLTAMPEROMETRIA DE ADSORCION-REDISOLUCION Directores: Fi. Manuel de Villena Rueda J.M. Pingarrón Carrazón MARíA PEDRERO MUÑOZ MADRID, 1993 Ciudad Universitaria 28040 Madrid (España) TeIéf. 394 43 31 Fax: 394 43 29 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALíTICA LUIS MARIA POLO DIEZ, CATEDRATICO Y DIRECTOR DE ESTE DEPARTAMENTO CERTIFICO: Que el presente trabajo, titulado “Determinación de herbicidas nitrofenoles y s-triazinas por valtamperometría de adsorción- redisolución”, ha sido realizado en este departamento por Dfia. MaríaPedrero Muflo;bajo la dirección del Dr. D. FranciscoJavier Manuel de Villena Rueda y del Dr. D. Jase Manuel Pingarrón Carrazón,ProfesoresTitulares de estedepartamento, constituyendo la Tesis Doctoral de su autora. Madrid, Junio 1993 A mis padres El presente trabajo ha sido realizado en el Departamento de Química Analítica de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid con la ayuda y colaboración de muchas personas. A todas ellas quiero expresar mi agradecimiento, en especial: Al Prof. Dr. Don Francisco Javier Manuel de Villena Rueda y al Prof. Dr. Don Jose Manuel Pm garrón Carrazón, sus directores, por su inestimable ayuda, dedicación y paciencia. Al Prof. Dr. Don Luis María Polo Diez, catedrático y director de este departamento, por haber puesto a mi disposición todos los medios necesarios para llevarlo a cabo. A las Lcdas. Dha. Victoria Calvo Baza, Dha. Paloma Soriano Gil-Albare- líos, Dha. Belén Casado Perdices y Dha. Rosa Alonso Velasco, por su generosa colaboración. Y a todas aquellas personas que de una manera u otra han contribuido a su realización, en especial a Dha.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Review
    INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW In secticides are defined as chemicals which are used to cont rol damage o r annoyance from insects by poisoning them through o ra 1 ingest i on o f s tomach poison s, by contact with the cuticle or by fumi g a nt ac tion through the air . Insects may also be controlled b y chemicals such a s at tractants and repellents which adversely i nfluence their behaviour, and by chemos t eri lan t s which pr e vent t h e i r rep rodu c ti o n. Th e term "insecticides" has been now replaced by " pesticides" which includes toxic chemicals, whether used against insects , fungi, weeds or rodents, etc. Agricultural disinfectants a n d an i rna l h e a l t h p r o d u c t s a r e , i n rna n y i n s t an c e s , a l s o i n c l u d e d und e r the term "pesticides". The use of insecticides has not only permitted the con trol of diseases transmitted by insects but also has led to increased food production and better health. Classification of insecticides Insecticides have been classified into the following c la s ses according to their mode of action: l . Stomach or internal insecticides Insecticides wh ich are eaten by insects are known as stomach insecticides. These insecticides are generally applied against insects with chewing mouthparts but under certain conditions they are also effective against insects with sponging, syphoning, lapping or sucki ng mo uthparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation Activities Report Final
    File: 18G D.B. UNITED STATES AmR FORCE 3 5 4 TH CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON INSTALLATION RESTORATION EIELSON AFB, ALASKA REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES REPORT FINAL NOVEMBER 1997 By $ ~~JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. 4300 B Street, Suite 600 Anchorage, Alaska 99503-5922 Form Approved I' ~~~~~~~~~~~REPORTDOCUMENTATION PAGE 0MB No. 070440188 la. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION l b. RESTRICTIVE MARXINGS Unclassified Not Applicable 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRtIBUTIONJAVAJI.ABIUrrY0F RE~PORT ~ Not Applicable Not for Public Release 2b. DECLASSIFICATIONIDOWNGRADING SCHEDULE Distribution is limited. Not Applicable 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 6. MONITORING ORkGANtZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) Not Applicable Not Applicable Ba. NAMEOFPROFRFUNGRGNGZATIONSRN 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL I9. PRMEOCURMENITOINSTRUMENTIDENTIFICTIO ORGANIZATION ~~~~~~~(Ifapplicable) NME JaFcobsEngnerngGoUSAc ArFoe Conterc No.En41624mental-Ex1ellenc 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and Zip Code) 10.ADESCiySOURCe, OFdFUNiNG NUMBER Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5363 PROGRAM POETN. TASK NO OK UNIT ELEMENT NO. ACESINN. 11. TITLE (Include Security Classification) Remediation Report - Drum Removal Activilies - Eielson AFB 12. PERSONAL AUThOR(S) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 13a. TYPE OF REPORT - l~b. TIME COVERED 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 1.PG ON Final FROM: August 1996 1997 November 14 1TO: August 1997 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION Not Applicable 17. COST CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse If necessary FIELDGROUP SUB-GROUP ~~~~~~~andIdentify by block number) Remedial Action, Drum Removal Elelson AFB. Alaska 19. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse If necessary and IdentIfy by block number) The document contains the remediation report on the drum removal activities at Eielson AFB. 20. DISTRIBUTIONIAVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION x I UnclasslfledlUntlmlted (3Same as RPT. ( TDICUsers Unclassified 22a.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 農薬の名称 Author(S) 大野, 稔 Citation 防虫科学 (1956), 21(2
    Title 農薬の名称 Author(s) 大野, 稔 Citation 防虫科学 (1956), 21(2): 54-62 Issue Date 1956-05-29 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/156936 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University 防 虫 科 学 郡 21 巻-T 雑 録 CommonNaJneSOEPesticidesMino印 OfI y0 ,BoLyu-Kagahu21 , 弘,1956. 13 ･､農 薬 の 名 称 . 大 野 稔 近咋多種多様の良薬の出葺削こより,ややもするとその名称に混乱を来 しそうである｡ 米国では T. Econ.Ent. , に用ひる殺虫剤の名称は ⅠnterdepartmentalCommitteeofPestControl で公認 された commonname のあるものは･ その名称 を 用ひなlすればな らないこととされて JF_tる｡ 其の他に, 独 占的でよく知 られた田有名や会社番号名の ものは 大文字をつけて用ひて も よい｡ 又長い間親 しまれた名称で改名すると混乱する恐れのあるものや, 分子中の原子,原子 団の位置を省略 した短い化学名な どは, そのまま使用 して もよいこととされて居 る｡ 次 に共等 の朝出剤及び教程の殺菌剤の名称 (下表 ･左仙)を示す｡ ComⅡ10JINamesoflnSeCticides NA hLJ.i HT,o BR D EFIyI,mi ･TO.TiITEでIA諾 SDr言霊NATl冨T3Ds .lldrin notlessthan95percentof1 ,2, 3,4,10,10- compourid118 hexachloro l1, 4,4a ,5,8,8a-hexahydr0-1 ,4,5,. 8-dimethanonapbtbalene .lllcthrin dE-2 lally1-41hydroxy-3-methy1-2-cyclopenten- allyll10mOlogofcinerin1 1-oneesterifiedwithamixtureofGisand syntheticpyrethrins ･ tramsdZ-Chrysanthemummonocarboxylicacids ^m.Cy.lnamid 3911 0,0-diethylS-ethylmercaptomethyldithio - pl10Sphate ^m.Cy.lnamid4124 0 -(2-cわlor(I-4-mitropheny l)-0,0 -dimethyl isochlorthion t】liophosphate ^rn.Cyanamid12008 0 ,0-diethyl.S-isopropylmercaptO-methyl dithoplloSphate ^m.Cyammid1200rJ 0,0-diethyl.Sl1Z-PrOpylmercapto一methyl dithiophospbate Am.Cy.lnamid12013 0,0 -diisopropylS-isopropylmercapt0-methyl dithiophosphate ^r.lmite productcontaining2-(p-tert-I)utylphenoxy) compoundSSR isopropy1-1-methylethy 1 2-chloroethyl-sulfitealkylarylsulfite azobenzene
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Chemical Contaminants in the Marine Environment
    Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment An overview of main contaminant lists Victoria Tornero, Georg Hanke 2017 EUR 28925 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Victoria Tornero Address: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Directorate D Sustainable Resources, Water and Marine Resources Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-785984 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC 108964 EUR 28925 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/337288 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Tornero V, Hanke G. Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment: An overview of main contaminant lists. ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6, EUR 28925, doi:10.2760/337288 All images © European Union 2017 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 2 Compilation of substances of environmental concern .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    Subject Index Abate, properties and uses 338 Alfalfa 120, 157, 175,209,232,276,375, - synthesis 338 422 Acaricides, definition 3 Algae control (see also Slime control) Acetaldehyde 111, 378 5, 115 Acethion, properties and uses 359 Algalol, see Aretan - synthesis 359 Algicides, definition 3 Acetone oxime N-phenylcarbamate, see Alipur 229 Proxypham Allethrin 131 If. 3-( et-Aceton y lbenzy I) -4-h ydroxycoumarin, Allyl alcohol 89 see Warfarin Allyl bromide 35 3-( et-Acetonyl-4' -chlorobenzy 1)-4-hydroxy- Allyl chloride 39 coumarin, see Coumachlor Allyl isothiocyanate 260 Acetophos, properties and uses 351 Alodan, permissible concentration in air - synthesis 351 65 3-Acetyl-6-methylpyrandione-2,4, see - properties and uses 52, 64 If. Dehydroacetic acid - synthesis 64, 268 1-Acetyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline, Aluminium phosphide, properties and uses see Kyuzol-A 445, 446 Acrex, see Dinobuton Ametryne 436 Acrolein 111 Amiben 148 Acrolein phenylhydrazone 279 Amides, pesticidal properties 124 If. Acrylonitrile 122, 128 Amidithion, properties and uses 363 Acylate, properties and uses 203 - synthesis 363 - synthesis 203 Amines, pesticidal properties 83 If. Adamsite 390 Amibenzenesulfonyl carbamate, see Aerogels, see Silica gel Compound ME-9057 Aerosol compositions 24 Aminocarb, see Matacil Aerosols 12, 20, 22 If. Aminoguanidine, synthesis 429 Agriculture, losses from pests 1, 5 If. 2-Amino-4-methyl-5-carboxanilidothiazole, Agronal295 see Seedvax Agvitor, properties and uses 384 Aminoparathion 324 - synthesis 384 5-Amino-3-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolyl-1- Alanap, properties and uses 152 bis( dimethylamido )phosphate, - synthesis 152 see Wepsin Alcohols, pesticidal properties 89 4-Amino-1 H -pyrazolo-3,4-pyrimidine Aldehydes, pesticidal properties 111 If.
    [Show full text]