DOCSLIB.ORG

Potential Chemical Contaminants in the Marine Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Potential Chemical Contaminants in the Marine Environment Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment An overview of main contaminant lists Victoria Tornero, Georg Hanke 2017 EUR 28925 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Victoria Tornero Address: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Directorate D Sustainable Resources, Water and Marine Resources Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-785984 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC 108964 EUR 28925 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/337288 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Tornero V, Hanke G. Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment: An overview of main contaminant lists. ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6, EUR 28925, doi:10.2760/337288 All images © European Union 2017 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 2 Compilation of substances of environmental concern .............................................. 4 2.1 Global conventions ....................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 The Stockholm Convention .................................................................... 4 2.1.2 The Rotterdam Convention .................................................................... 4 2.1.3 The Basel Convention ........................................................................... 4 2.1.4 UNECE Conventions ............................................................................. 4 2.1.5 The International Convention for the prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) ..................................................................................................... 5 2.2 European legislations ................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 WFD ................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH) ............... 6 2.2.3 Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation ........................... 7 2.2.4 Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR) .......................................................... 7 2.2.5 Food and feed safety legislation ............................................................. 7 2.2.6 Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) ....................................................... 8 2.2.7 European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) ...................... 8 2.3 Approaches in European Regional Seas ........................................................... 8 2.3.1 UNEP MAP Barcelona Convention ........................................................... 8 2.3.2 The Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (Black Sea Commission) ........................................................................................... 9 2.3.3 The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM) .............. 9 2.3.4 The Commission for the protection of the marine environment of the North- East Atlantic (OSPAR) .................................................................................. 10 2.4 Others ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) ........................... 11 2.4.2 The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) list of priority pollutants ................................................................................................... 11 2.4.3 NORMAN Network .............................................................................. 11 2.4.4 JRC list of marine-relevant contaminants .............................................. 12 2.5 Other EU chemical databases ...................................................................... 12 2.5.1 EMODnet .......................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 WISE-Marine ..................................................................................... 12 3 Results ........................................................................................................... 13 4 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 15 References ......................................................................................................... 16 List of abbreviations and definitions ....................................................................... 17 Annexes ............................................................................................................. 19 Annex I. Substances (or groups of substances) considered under relevant EU legislation and international organizations .......................................................... 19 Acknowledgements Craig Robinson, Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky, Henna Piha, Iryna Makarenko, Jo Foden, Koen Parmentier, Lena Avellan, Teresa Lettieri, Victor León, Irene del Barrio Authors Victoria Tornero, Georg Hanke 1 Abstract The identification of priority chemicals is a challenge for regulators, managers and researchers all around the world. This report compiles in a single list more than 2700 substances (or groups of substances) coming from main lists of chemicals compiled by relevant global conventions, European legislation, European regional seas and dedicated research work. Although not all of these contaminants are of concern for the marine environment or for a particular MSFD region/sub-region/Member State, this general overview should help understand the different options and support further developments for the monitoring and assessment of chemical pollution in European marine waters. Discussion and collaboration between the different stakeholders and expert groups will be necessary for an efficient way towards an equally high level of protection for healthy and productive oceans. This compilation also assists in using a harmonized nomenclature for the unambiguous identification of the substances of concern. It may also serve as a basis for discussions about procedures for grouping/combining substances at European level. This is expected to facilitate consistency in the upcoming 2018 MSFD data reporting. 2 1 Introduction Chemical pollution is one of the main environmental issues in the world today. Over 131 million registered chemical substances appear in the Chemical Abstracts Service Registry File. 387,150 of them are somehow regulated in the international markets (CAS, 2017). The vast number of contaminants that consequently may be present in the environment poses a great challenge for our planet. Regulators, managers and researchers all around the world have been devoted to the task of identifying the most relevant substances or groups of substances deserving particular attention. In this context, the common approach has been to develop a list of chemicals to focus on based on their potential hazard to the ecosystems and/or to human health. Most relevant legislation currently for the protection of the European aquatic environment are the Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC1) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD, 2008/56/EC2 and amendment EU 2017/8453). The WFD establishes a list of substances of EU-wide concern (the priority substances, PS4) as a means to assess the chemical status of water bodies up to 12 nautical miles from the straightened coastline. This directive also requires the selection by Member States of substances of national or local concern (river basin specific pollutants, RBSP), which form part of the quality elements for "good ecological status” up to 1 nautical mile. The MSFD descriptor 8 “Concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects” completes the coverage of marine waters by provisions for substance selection in the areas covered by European legislation. In accordance with the new MSFD Commission Decision on criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status (GES) (2017/848/EU5), EU Member States have to consider contaminants already identified as PS or RBSP under the WFD, but also other additional substances that may give rise to pollution effects. Other legislation, including for the safeguarding of (sea)food, regulatory agencies (e.g. ECHA), regional frameworks, international conventions and dedicated research programs have also developed lists of “priority” environmental chemicals. The aim of this report is to provide an overall
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 25/00 (2006.01) A OIN 43/653 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A0 41/06 (2006.01) A01N 37/50 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2012/068096 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 14 September 2012 (14.09.2012) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (25) Filing Language: English RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 1118 1702.9 16 September 201 1 (16.09.201 1) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): BAYER GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH [DE/DE]; Al- UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, fred-Nobel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • 19706697.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALITICA UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DETERMINACION DE HERBICIDAS N1TROFENOLES Y S-TRIAZINAS POR VOLTAMPEROMETRIA DE ADSORCION-REDISOLUCION Directores: Fi. Manuel de Villena Rueda J.M. Pingarrón Carrazón MARíA PEDRERO MUÑOZ MADRID, 1993 Ciudad Universitaria 28040 Madrid (España) TeIéf. 394 43 31 Fax: 394 43 29 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS QUíMICAS DEPARTAMENTO DE QUíMICA ANALíTICA LUIS MARIA POLO DIEZ, CATEDRATICO Y DIRECTOR DE ESTE DEPARTAMENTO CERTIFICO: Que el presente trabajo, titulado “Determinación de herbicidas nitrofenoles y s-triazinas por valtamperometría de adsorción- redisolución”, ha sido realizado en este departamento por Dfia. MaríaPedrero Muflo;bajo la dirección del Dr. D. FranciscoJavier Manuel de Villena Rueda y del Dr. D. Jase Manuel Pingarrón Carrazón,ProfesoresTitulares de estedepartamento, constituyendo la Tesis Doctoral de su autora. Madrid, Junio 1993 A mis padres El presente trabajo ha sido realizado en el Departamento de Química Analítica de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid con la ayuda y colaboración de muchas personas. A todas ellas quiero expresar mi agradecimiento, en especial: Al Prof. Dr. Don Francisco Javier Manuel de Villena Rueda y al Prof. Dr. Don Jose Manuel Pm garrón Carrazón, sus directores, por su inestimable ayuda, dedicación y paciencia. Al Prof. Dr. Don Luis María Polo Diez, catedrático y director de este departamento, por haber puesto a mi disposición todos los medios necesarios para llevarlo a cabo. A las Lcdas. Dha. Victoria Calvo Baza, Dha. Paloma Soriano Gil-Albare- líos, Dha. Belén Casado Perdices y Dha. Rosa Alonso Velasco, por su generosa colaboración. Y a todas aquellas personas que de una manera u otra han contribuido a su realización, en especial a Dha.
    [Show full text]
  • R Graphics Output
    Dexamethasone sodium phosphate ( 0.339 ) Melengestrol acetate ( 0.282 ) 17beta−Trenbolone ( 0.252 ) 17alpha−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 17alpha−Hydroxyprogesterone ( 0.238 ) Triamcinolone ( 0.233 ) Zearalenone ( 0.216 ) CP−634384 ( 0.21 ) 17alpha−Ethinylestradiol ( 0.203 ) Raloxifene hydrochloride ( 0.203 ) Volinanserin ( 0.2 ) Tiratricol ( 0.197 ) trans−Retinoic acid ( 0.192 ) Chlorpromazine hydrochloride ( 0.191 ) PharmaGSID_47315 ( 0.185 ) Apigenin ( 0.183 ) Diethylstilbestrol ( 0.178 ) 4−Dodecylphenol ( 0.161 ) 2,2',6,6'−Tetrachlorobisphenol A ( 0.156 ) o,p'−DDD ( 0.155 ) Progesterone ( 0.152 ) 4−Hydroxytamoxifen ( 0.151 ) SSR150106 ( 0.149 ) Equilin ( 0.3 ) 3,5,3'−Triiodothyronine ( 0.256 ) 17−Methyltestosterone ( 0.242 ) 17beta−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 5alpha−Dihydrotestosterone ( 0.235 ) Mifepristone ( 0.218 ) Norethindrone ( 0.214 ) Spironolactone ( 0.204 ) Farglitazar ( 0.203 ) Testosterone propionate ( 0.202 ) meso−Hexestrol ( 0.199 ) Mestranol ( 0.196 ) Estriol ( 0.191 ) 2,2',4,4'−Tetrahydroxybenzophenone ( 0.185 ) 3,3,5,5−Tetraiodothyroacetic acid ( 0.183 ) Norgestrel ( 0.181 ) Cyproterone acetate ( 0.164 ) GSK232420A ( 0.161 ) N−Dodecanoyl−N−methylglycine ( 0.155 ) Pentachloroanisole ( 0.154 ) HPTE ( 0.151 ) Biochanin A ( 0.15 ) Dehydroepiandrosterone ( 0.149 ) PharmaCode_333941 ( 0.148 ) Prednisone ( 0.146 ) Nordihydroguaiaretic acid ( 0.145 ) p,p'−DDD ( 0.144 ) Diphenhydramine hydrochloride ( 0.142 ) Forskolin ( 0.141 ) Perfluorooctanoic acid ( 0.14 ) Oleyl sarcosine ( 0.139 ) Cyclohexylphenylketone ( 0.138 ) Pirinixic acid ( 0.137 )
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting Materials
    California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Synthetic Turf Study Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019 MEETING MATERIALS THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency Agenda Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019, 9:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 1001 I Street, CalEPA Headquarters Building, Sacramento Byron Sher Auditorium The agenda for this meeting is given below. The order of items on the agenda is provided for general reference only. The order in which items are taken up by the Panel is subject to change. 1. Welcome and Opening Remarks 2. Synthetic Turf and Playground Studies Overview 4. Synthetic Turf Field Exposure Model Exposure Equations Exposure Parameters 3. Non-Targeted Chemical Analysis Volatile Organics on Synthetic Turf Fields Non-Polar Organics Constituents in Crumb Rubber Polar Organic Constituents in Crumb Rubber 5. Public Comments: For members of the public attending in-person: Comments will be limited to three minutes per commenter. For members of the public attending via the internet: Comments may be sent via email to [email protected]. Email comments will be read aloud, up to three minutes each, by staff of OEHHA during the public comment period, as time allows. 6. Further Panel Discussion and Closing Remarks 7. Wrap Up and Adjournment Agenda Synthetic Turf Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DRAFT for Discussion at May 2019 SAP Meeting. Table of Contents Synthetic Turf and Playground Studies Overview May 2019 Update .....
    [Show full text]
  • Title <綜説>Insecticide-Resistance and Darwinism Author(S) BROWN
    Title <綜説>Insecticide-resistance and Darwinism Author(s) BROWN, A.W.A. Citation 防虫科学 (1957), 22(2): 277-282 Issue Date 1957-05-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/157282 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Insecticide-resistance and Darwinism. * A. W. A; BROWN (Professor and Head of the Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. Temporarily, Scientist (Biologist) of W. H. 0., Division of Environmental Sanita- tion). Received May 8, 1957. Botyu-Kagaku 22,277,1957. ' ' 48. *1m~lmmt±c9"?-! ='AA (!'J;m: rJJmWF 22, 282, 1957) Next summer, the International Congress of including Hikone in 1954. Zoology will 'meet in London to celebrate the The housefly has also developed resistance to centenary of"The Origin of Species," and to other insecticides, which like DDT are in the class honour its author Charles Robert Darwin. Darwin known as chlorinated' hydrocarbons, In 1949, stated, 100 years ago, that it was natural selection, BHC-and dieldrin-resistance was reported in Cali­ operating on the normal variation of animals and fornia. Finally resistance has appeared to those plants which Over the course' of time separated insecticides which we at first thought never in­ the subspecies which,' he said, were the origin duce it, namely the organophosphorus compounds; of species. 'Vith that book he made his out­ it was reported from Denmark in 1955 that para­ standing contribution to the progress of science thion, diazinon and Resitox can no longer control and radically changed the thought of man. For houseflies there. proof, Darwin pointed not only to 'what could This resistance is not only confined to the be seen in different parts of the world, but also housefly.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Management of Pesticides and Diagnosis and Treatment Of
    * Revision of the“IPCS - Multilevel Course on the Safe Use of Pesticides and on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Presticide Poisoning, 1994” © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgement Part I. Overview 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives 2. Overview of the resource tool 2.1 Moduledescription 2.2 Training levels 2.3 Visual aids 2.4 Informationsources 3. Using the resource tool 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Training trainers 3.2.1 Organizational aspects 3.2.2 Coordinator’s preparation 3.2.3 Selection of participants 3.2.4 Before training trainers 3.2.5 Specimen module 3.3 Trainers 3.3.1 Trainer preparation 3.3.2 Selection of participants 3.3.3 Organizational aspects 3.3.4 Before a course 4.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G Acid Dissociation Constants
    harxxxxx_App-G.qxd 3/8/10 1:34 PM Page AP11 APPENDIX G Acid Dissociation Constants §␮ ϭ 0.1 M 0 ؍ (Ionic strength (␮ † ‡ † Name Structure* pKa Ka pKa ϫ Ϫ5 Acetic acid CH3CO2H 4.756 1.75 10 4.56 (ethanoic acid) N ϩ H3 ϫ Ϫ3 Alanine CHCH3 2.344 (CO2H) 4.53 10 2.33 ϫ Ϫ10 9.868 (NH3) 1.36 10 9.71 CO2H ϩ Ϫ5 Aminobenzene NH3 4.601 2.51 ϫ 10 4.64 (aniline) ϪO SNϩ Ϫ4 4-Aminobenzenesulfonic acid 3 H3 3.232 5.86 ϫ 10 3.01 (sulfanilic acid) ϩ NH3 ϫ Ϫ3 2-Aminobenzoic acid 2.08 (CO2H) 8.3 10 2.01 ϫ Ϫ5 (anthranilic acid) 4.96 (NH3) 1.10 10 4.78 CO2H ϩ 2-Aminoethanethiol HSCH2CH2NH3 —— 8.21 (SH) (2-mercaptoethylamine) —— 10.73 (NH3) ϩ ϫ Ϫ10 2-Aminoethanol HOCH2CH2NH3 9.498 3.18 10 9.52 (ethanolamine) O H ϫ Ϫ5 4.70 (NH3) (20°) 2.0 10 4.74 2-Aminophenol Ϫ 9.97 (OH) (20°) 1.05 ϫ 10 10 9.87 ϩ NH3 ϩ ϫ Ϫ10 Ammonia NH4 9.245 5.69 10 9.26 N ϩ H3 N ϩ H2 ϫ Ϫ2 1.823 (CO2H) 1.50 10 2.03 CHCH CH CH NHC ϫ Ϫ9 Arginine 2 2 2 8.991 (NH3) 1.02 10 9.00 NH —— (NH2) —— (12.1) CO2H 2 O Ϫ 2.24 5.8 ϫ 10 3 2.15 Ϫ Arsenic acid HO As OH 6.96 1.10 ϫ 10 7 6.65 Ϫ (hydrogen arsenate) (11.50) 3.2 ϫ 10 12 (11.18) OH ϫ Ϫ10 Arsenious acid As(OH)3 9.29 5.1 10 9.14 (hydrogen arsenite) N ϩ O H3 Asparagine CHCH2CNH2 —— —— 2.16 (CO2H) —— —— 8.73 (NH3) CO2H *Each acid is written in its protonated form.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • An Automated Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry System for the Sensitive Shipboard Analysis of Volatile Organi
    J. Sep. Sci. 2001, 24, 97–103 Hashimoto, Tanaka, Yamashita, Maeda97 Shinya Hashimotoa), An automated purge and trap gas chromatography- Toshiyuki Tanakab), mass spectrometry system for the sensitive Nobuyoshi Yamashitab), Tsuneaki Maedac) shipboard analysis of volatile organic compounds in seawater a) Department of Ocean Sciences, Tokyo University of We developed an automated purge and trap unit connected to a gas chromatograph- Fisheries, 4-5-7 Konan, Minato- mass spectrometer for shipboard determination of unstable volatile organic com- ku, Tokyo 108±8477, Japan pounds in seawater. The device used a small column for the rapid desorption of ad- b) National Institute for sorbed compounds, thus eliminating the need for post-desorption cryofocusing. The Resources and Environment, a 16-3 Onogawa, Tsukuba, repeatability (relative standard deviation, RSD; n = 7) was typically 5%. The detection Ibaraki 305±8569, Japan limits were 0.1–4.3 pM for chloromethane, bromomethane, dichloromethane, iodo- c) DKK Corporation, 4-13-14 methane, dimethyl sulfide, iodoethane, isoprene, bromochloromethane, chloroform, Kichijoji Kitamachi, Musashino- tetrachloromethane, dibromomethane, bromodichloromethane, iodopropane, chlor- shi, Tokyo 108-0001, Japan oiodomethane, dimethyl disulfide, dibromochloromethane, bromoform, and diiodo- methane. To investigate the stability of seawater samples, we obtained a concentra- tion-time profile of volatile organic compounds using this method during the incubation of a seawater sample with and without the addition of HgCl2 in the dark at 48C. We found shipboard determination to be suitable and essential for the determination of un- stable compounds such as dimethyl sulfide in seawater, as the concentration of di- methyl sulfide increased considerably during the incubation of a seawater sample both with and without the addition of HgCl2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water
    PROJECT NO. 4992 Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Prepared by: Keith A. Maruya Charles S. Wong Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority 2020 The Water Research Foundation (WRF) is a nonprofit (501c3) organization which provides a unified source for One Water research and a strong presence in relationships with partner organizations, government and regulatory agencies, and Congress. The foundation conducts research in all areas of drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, and water reuse. The Water Research Foundation’s research portfolio is valued at over $700 million. The Foundation plays an important role in the translation and dissemination of applied research, technology demonstration, and education, through creation of research‐based educational tools and technology exchange opportunities. WRF serves as a leader and model for collaboration across the water industry and its materials are used to inform policymakers and the public on the science, economic value, and environmental benefits of using and recovering resources found in water, as well as the feasibility of implementing new technologies. For more information, contact: The Water Research Foundation Alexandria, VA Office Denver, CO Office 1199 North Fairfax Street, Suite 900 6666 West Quincy Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314‐1445 Denver, Colorado 80235‐3098 Tel: 571.384.2100 Tel: 303.347.6100 www.waterrf.org [email protected] ©Copyright 2020 by The Water Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Permission to copy must be obtained from The Water Research Foundation. WRF ISBN: 978‐1‐60573‐503‐0 WRF Project Number: 4992 This report was prepared by the organization(s) named below as an account of work sponsored by The Water Research Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Homogeneous Models of Thiophene Hds Reactions
    HOMOGENEOUS MODELS OF THIOPHENE HDS REACTIONS. SELECTIVITY IN THIOPHENE C-S CLEAVAGE AND THIOPHENE REACTIONS WITH DINUCLEAR METAL COMPLEXES. William D. Jones,* David A. Vicic, R. Martin Chin, James H. Roache, and Andy W. Myers. Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 Received August 1, 1996 - Abstract: The reactive 16 e metal fragment [(C5Me5)Rh(PMe3)] inserts into a wide variety of thiophene C-S bonds. The structures of the thiophene, benzothiophene, and dibenzothiophene insertion complexes have been determined. While the thiophene complex adopts a planar 6- membered ring structure the other metallacycles are bent, and all molecules possess localized diene structures. The mechanism of C-S cleavage was found to proceed by way of initial sulfur coordination. 2-Methylbenzothiophene gives a kinetic product resulting from cleavage of the sulfur-vinyl bond, but then rearranges to cleave the sulfur-aryl bond. A number of substituted dibenzothiophenes were examined, showing little electronic effect of substituents, but showing a large steric effect of substituents at the 4 and 6 positions. 4,6-Dimethyldibenzothiophene does not undergo cleavage, but instead forms an S-bound complex. Reactions of a cobalt analog, (C5Me5)Co(C2H4)2 with thiophenes also lead to C-S cleaved products, and the use of a dinuclear iridium system produces a butadiene complex in which both C-S bonds have been cleaved. Introduction of these sulfur containing compounds prior to The hydrodesulfurization of petroleum is one treatment. Figure 2 shows how this original mixture of several steps in the hydrotreating of oil in which of compounds is changed upon HDS treatment at sulfur is removed from thiols and thiophenes as temperatures of 350 - 390 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical List
    1 EXHIBIT 1 2 CHEMICAL CLASSIFICATION LIST 3 4 1. Pyrophoric Chemicals 5 1.1. Aluminum alkyls: R3Al, R2AlCl, RAlCl2 6 Examples: Et3Al, Et2AlCl, EtAlCl2, Me3Al, Diethylethoxyaluminium 7 1.2. Grignard Reagents: RMgX (R=alkyl, aryl, vinyl X=halogen) 8 1.3. Lithium Reagents: RLi (R = alkyls, aryls, vinyls) 9 Examples: Butyllithium, Isobutyllithium, sec-Butyllithium, tert-Butyllithium, 10 Ethyllithium, Isopropyllithium, Methyllithium, (Trimethylsilyl)methyllithium, 11 Phenyllithium, 2-Thienyllithium, Vinyllithium, Lithium acetylide ethylenediamine 12 complex, Lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide, Lithium phenylacetylide 13 1.4. Zinc Alkyl Reagents: RZnX, R2Zn 14 Examples: Et2Zn 15 1.5. Metal carbonyls: Lithium carbonyl, Nickel tetracarbonyl, Dicobalt octacarbonyl 16 1.6. Metal powders (finely divided): Bismuth, Calcium, Cobalt, Hafnium, Iron, 17 Magnesium, Titanium, Uranium, Zinc, Zirconium 18 1.7. Low Valent Metals: Titanium dichloride 19 1.8. Metal hydrides: Potassium Hydride, Sodium hydride, Lithium Aluminum Hydride, 20 Diethylaluminium hydride, Diisobutylaluminum hydride 21 1.9. Nonmetal hydrides: Arsine, Boranes, Diethylarsine, diethylphosphine, Germane, 22 Phosphine, phenylphosphine, Silane, Methanetellurol (CH3TeH) 23 1.10. Non-metal alkyls: R3B, R3P, R3As; Tributylphosphine, Dichloro(methyl)silane 24 1.11. Used hydrogenation catalysts: Raney nickel, Palladium, Platinum 25 1.12. Activated Copper fuel cell catalysts, e.g. Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 26 1.13. Finely Divided Sulfides: Iron Sulfides (FeS, FeS2, Fe3S4), and Potassium Sulfide 27 (K2S) 28 REFERRAL
    [Show full text]