DOCSLIB.ORG

Beheerplan Bosreservaat Hasselbos Te Tongeren

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beheerplan Bosreservaat Hasselbos Te Tongeren Beheerplan bosreservaat Hasselbos te Tongeren In opdracht van het Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos Grontmij Belgium Gent, maart 2013 Verantwoording Titel : Beheerplan bosreservaat Hasselbos Opdrachtgever : Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos, Centrale diensten Koning Albert II-laan 20, bus 8, 1000 Brussel tel. 02-553.21.84 fax. 02-553.81.05 Leidend ambtenaar : Johnny Cornelis email: [email protected] Datum : maart 2013 Auteur : Bart Opstaele email: [email protected] Inventarisaties : Flora en biotoopkartering – Grontmij (Bart Opstaele, David Berten) : Broedvogels en dagvlinders – Nature-ID : Dood-houtkevers – Luc Crevecoeur : Vleermuizen – Daan Dekeukeleire Contact : Grontmij Belgium N.V. Meersstraat 138A B-9000 Gent T +32 9 241 59 20 F +32 9 241 59 30 [email protected] www.grontmij.be Foto’s voorblad: oude knotes en Mannetjesorchissen (Bart Opstaele) – Wrangwortel (Maarten Jacobs) – Bechsteins vleermuis (Daan Dekeukeleire) Pagina 2 van 82 Inhoudsopgave 1 Inleiding ....................................................................................................................7 1.1 Statuut ......................................................................................................................7 1.2 Aanleiding.................................................................................................................7 2 Identificatie..............................................................................................................8 2.1 Eigendomsstatuut en identiteit...................................................................................8 2.2 Kadastraal overzicht..................................................................................................8 2.3 Administratieve en geografische situering..................................................................9 2.4 Bestemming volgens gewestplan...............................................................................9 2.5 Beleidsplannen en –initiatieven ...............................................................................10 2.5.1 Planningsprocessen voor landbouw, natuur en bos regio Haspengouw-Voeren .......10 2.5.2 Gemeentelijk Ruimtelijk Structuurplan (GRS)...........................................................11 2.6 Ligging in of nabij Speciale Beschermingszones......................................................11 2.6.1 Europese Speciale Beschermingszones: Habitatrichtlijngebied................................11 2.6.2 Vlaams Ecologisch Netwerk ....................................................................................14 2.6.3 Landschapsatlas .....................................................................................................14 2.6.4 Andere ....................................................................................................................14 2.7 Erfdienstbaarheden.................................................................................................15 2.7.1 Wegen ....................................................................................................................15 2.7.2 Waterlopen..............................................................................................................15 2.8 Situatieplan zones integraal en gericht beheer.........................................................16 2.9 Geschiedenis ..........................................................................................................17 2.9.1 Eigendomsgeschiedenis..........................................................................................17 2.9.2 Geschiedenis van het landgebruik...........................................................................17 2.10 Kenmerken van het vroegere beheer.......................................................................20 3 Algemene beschrijving .........................................................................................22 3.1 Beschrijving van de standplaats ..............................................................................22 3.1.1 Reliëf ......................................................................................................................22 3.1.2 Bodem en geologie (deels naar M. Antrop et. al., 2002)...........................................23 3.1.2.1 Bodem ....................................................................................................................23 3.1.2.2 Geologie .................................................................................................................23 3.1.3 Hydrografie en hydrologie........................................................................................24 3.1.3.1 Oppervlaktewater ....................................................................................................24 3.1.3.2 Grondwater .............................................................................................................24 3.2 Biologisch milieu .....................................................................................................25 3.2.1 Biologische waarderingskaart..................................................................................25 3.2.2 Vergelijking met de Potentieel Natuurlijke Vegetatiekaart.........................................25 3.2.3 Flora .......................................................................................................................26 3.2.3.1 Rode lijstsoorten .....................................................................................................26 3.2.3.2 Oud-bosplanten.......................................................................................................27 3.2.3.3 Overige vermeldenswaardige soorten en historische waarnemingen .......................28 3.2.3.4 Autochtone bomen en struiken ................................................................................29 3.2.3.5 Invasieve soorten....................................................................................................30 3.2.4 Mossen ...................................................................................................................30 3.2.5 Vegetatie.................................................................................................................31 3.2.6 Fauna .....................................................................................................................32 Pagina 3 van 82 3.2.6.1 Avifauna..................................................................................................................32 3.2.6.2 Zoogdieren..............................................................................................................32 3.2.6.3 Herpetofauna ..........................................................................................................34 3.2.6.4 Invertebraten...........................................................................................................34 3.2.7 Bestandenkaart en bestandsbeschrijvingen.............................................................37 3.3 Statistische gegevens..............................................................................................38 3.3.1 Dendrometrische gegevens.....................................................................................38 3.3.1.1 Bestandskenmerken................................................................................................38 3.3.1.2 Boomsoortensamenstelling .....................................................................................39 3.3.1.3 Herkomst (inheems-uitheems).................................................................................43 3.3.1.4 Dendrometrische gegevens.....................................................................................43 3.3.1.5 Biotoopkartering......................................................................................................45 3.3.2 Fytosociologische inventaris....................................................................................46 3.3.3 Faunistische inventaris............................................................................................52 3.3.4 Opbrengsten en diensten ........................................................................................52 3.4 Bosdifferentiërende elementen................................................................................53 3.4.1 Poelen ....................................................................................................................53 3.4.2 Opmerkelijke solitaire bomen...................................................................................53 3.4.3 Hagen en houtkanten ..............................................................................................53 3.4.4 Bosranden ..............................................................................................................53 3.5 Beschrijving van de boswegen en andere infrastructuur...........................................54 3.5.1 Boswegen ...............................................................................................................54 3.6 Recreatieve functies en toegankelijkheid .................................................................54 3.6.1 Toegankelijkheid .....................................................................................................54 3.7 Knelpunten..............................................................................................................54 3.7.1 Nutriëntenaanvoer vanuit de zuidelijke akkers .........................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz
    Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Die Käfer Schleswig-Holsteins Rote Liste Band 2 Herausgeber: Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (MLUR) Erarbeitung durch: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Hamburger Chaussee 25 24220 Flintbek Tel.: 0 43 47 / 704-0 www.llur.schleswig-holstein.de Ansprechpartner: Arne Drews (Tel. 0 43 47 / 704-360) Autoren: Stephan Gürlich Roland Suikat Wolfgang Ziegler Titelfoto: Macroplea mutica (RL 1), Langklauen-Rohrblattkäfer, 7 mm, Familie Blattkäfer, Unterfamilie Schilfkäfer galt bereits als ausgestorben. Die Art konnte aber in neuerer Zeit in den Seegraswiesen der Orther Reede auf Fehmarn wieder nachgewiesen werden. Die Käferart vollzieht ihren gesamten Lebenszyklus vollständig submers und gehört gleichzeitig zu den ganz wenigen Insektenarten, die im Salzwasser leben können. Dieses einzige an der schleswig-hol- steinischen Ostseeküste bekannte Vorkommen ist in den dortigen Flachwasserzonen durch Wassersport gefährdet. (Foto: R. Suikat) Herstellung: Pirwitz Druck & Design, Kronshagen Dezember 2011 ISBN: 978-3-937937-54-0 Schriftenreihe: LLUR SH – Natur - RL 23 Band 2 von 3 Diese Broschüre wurde auf Recyclingpapier hergestellt. Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der schleswig- holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwerbung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahl- kampf zum Zwecke der Wahlwerbung verwendet werden. Auch ohne zeit- lichen Bezug zu einer bevorstehenden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Partei- nahme der Landesregierung zu Gunsten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden könnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu verwenden.
    [Show full text]
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PÍRODOV DECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE A ORNITOLOGICKÁ LABORATO Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) DOKTORSKÁ DISERTA NÍ PRÁCE Josef Kašák Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Olomouc 2015 Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a p íjmení autora: Josef Kašák Název práce: Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) Typ práce: doktorská diserta ní práce Pracovišt : Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato , P írodov decká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Studijní program: P1527 Biologie Studijní obor: Zoologie Rok obhajoby práce: 2015 Abstrakt: Biodiverzita jako variabilita života poskytuje lidské spole nosti adu nezbytných zdroj , ekosystémových služeb a p edstavuje také významnou kulturní hodnotu. Na druhé stran však dochází sou asn k jejímu ochuzování v souvislosti s rozvojem lidské spole nosti. Z pohledu ochrany p írody se proto horské ekosystémy adí mezi jedno z nejcenn jších a nejohrožen jších prost edí v globálním m ítku. V rámci p edložené doktorské práce byly studovány vybrané potenciáln významné antropické vlivy na biodiverzitu horských bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku prost ednictvím modelové bioindika ní skupiny brouk (Coleoptera). V prostoru primárního bezlesí arkto- alpinní tundry byl studován vliv sjezdových tratí a invazivní d eviny borovice kle e ( Pinus mugo ) na spole enstva brouk . Na území sekundárních bezlesí podhorských luk a pastvin byl hodnocen vliv zem dlského hospoda ení na brouky a další bezobratlé. Studium vlivu lyža ského areálu prokázalo, že p estože jsou sjezdové trat v alpínské zón zájmového území provozovány zp sobem šetrným k vegetaci, tak pr kazn m ní pvodní spole enstva epigeických brouk .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O19749
    Oikos o19749 Gerisch, M., Agostinelli, V., Henle, K. and Dziock, F. 2011. More species, but all do the same: contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. – Oikos 121: 508–515. Appendix A1 Tabelle1 Table A1. Full species list representing the standardized number of individuals per species for the study sites Steckby, Woerlitz, and Sandau. Density expresses the proportion of species standardized abundances to total abundance. Macropterous = winged, brachypterous = wingless, dimorphic = both forms can appear with a species. Body size is the average of maximum and minimum values found in the literature (for references see below). Wing Reproduction Body size Species names Steckby Woerlitz Sandau Density Morphology Season In mm Acupalpus dubius 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 2.6 Acupalpus exiguus 1.838 1.019 0.71 0.005 macropterous spring 2.7 Acupalpus parvulus 0.081 0.038 0.032 0 macropterous spring 3.6 Agonum dolens 0.032 0.038 0.081 0 dimorph spring 8.8 Agonum duftschmidi 14.966 2.755 0.016 0.025 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum emarginatum 116.659 4.472 25.194 0.208 macropterous spring 7.2 Agonum fuliginosum 0.097 0.038 0 0 dimorph spring 6.7 Agonum lugens 0.177 0 0.081 0 macropterous spring 9 Agonum marginatum 0.371 0.075 0.113 0.001 macropterous spring 9.2 Agonum micans 19.502 4.208 23.71 0.067 macropterous spring 6.6 Agonum muelleri 0 0.019 0 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum piceum 0.468 0 0.016 0.001 macropterous spring 6.4 Agonum sexpunctatum 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. GEO-Tag Der Artenvielfalt Griffner Schlossberg Und Griffner See, Kärnten 11./12
    ©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Carinthia II B 1947114. Jahrgang B Seiten 537-590 B Klagenfurt 2004 537 6. GEO-Tag der Artenvielfalt Griffner Schlossberg und Griffner See, Kärnten 11./12. Juni 2004 Von Christian WIESER, Christian K0MP0SCH, Klaus KRAINER & Johann WAGNER Schlagworte: Keywords: GEO-Tag, Artenvielfalt, Griffner Schlossberg, Griffner See, Kärnten. GEO-day, biodiversity, Griffner Schlossberg, Griffner See, Zusammenfassung: Carinthia, Austria. Am 6. GEO-Tag der Artenvielfalt (11.-12. Juni 2004) waren insgesamt mehr als 100 Wissenschafter und Hobbyforscher beteiligt. Während der 24-stün- Summary: digen Erhebung am Griffner Schlossberg und Griffner See (Bezirk Völker- More than 100 scientists and ama- markt, Kärnten) wurden 2398 Arten aus 34 Pflanzen-, Tier- und Pilzgruppen teur researchers were involved in nachgewiesen. the 6th GEO-day of biodiversity, Die Marktgemeinde Griffen ist damit nicht nur im bundesland- sondern auch which took place on the 11* to 12th im mitteleuropaweiten Vergleich als hot-spot der Biodiversität bezeichnen. June 2004 in the Griffner castle- Aus naturschutzfachlicher Sicht erlangen die Lebensgemeinschaften der mountain and lake. During a period Felswände, Höhlen, Laubwälder und Verlandungszonen hohe Bedeutung. of 24 hours 2349 species of 34 plant-, Bemerkenswert ist der Erstnachweis einer Sackspinne für Österreich, zu- animal- and fungus-groups could be dem können 8 Schmetterlings-, 4 Spinnenarten sowie eine Wanzenart erst- recorded. Due to this high number mals für Kärnten genannt werden! of species the district of Griffen is Auch die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit kann durch das hohe Engagement der Ge- revealed as a hot-spot of biodiver- meinde, die umfangreichen Schulaktionen und die enge Zusammenarbeit sity with national and central-euro- mit der Presse als voller Erfolg bezeichnet werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabidae Recording Card A4
    Locality Grey cells for GPS RA77 COLEOPTERA: Carabidae (6453) Vice-county Grid reference users Recording Form Recorder Determiner Compiler Source (tick one) Date(s) from: Habitat (optional) Altitude Field to: (metres) Museum* *Source details No. No. No. Literature* OMOPHRONINAE 21309 Dyschirius politus 22335 Bembidion nigricorne 22717 Pterostichus niger 23716 Amara familiaris 24603 Stenolophus teutonus 25805 Dromius melanocephalus 20201 Omophron limbatum 21310 Dyschirius salinus 22336 Bembidion nigropiceum 22724 Pterostichus nigrita agg. 23717 Amara fulva 24501 Bradycellus caucasicus 25806 Dromius meridionalis CARABINAE 21311 Dyschirius thoracicus 22338 Bembidion normannum 22718 Pterostichus nigrita s.s. 23718 Amara fusca 24502 Bradycellus csikii 25807 Dromius notatus 20501 Calosoma inquisitor 21401 Clivina collaris 22339 Bembidion obliquum 22723 Pterostichus rhaeticus 23719 Amara infima 24503 Bradycellus distinctus 25808 Dromius quadrimaculatus 20502 Calosoma sycophanta 21402 Clivina fossor 22340 Bembidion obtusum 22719 Pterostichus oblongopunctatus 23720 Amara lucida 24504 Bradycellus harpalinus 25810 Dromius quadrisignatus 20401 Carabus arvensis BROSCINAE 22341 Bembidion octomaculatum 22703 Pterostichus quadrifoveolatus 23721 Amara lunicollis 24505 Bradycellus ruficollis 25811 Dromius sigma 20402 Carabus auratus 21501 Broscus cephalotes 22342 Bembidion pallidipenne 22720 Pterostichus strenuus 23722 Amara montivaga 24506 Bradycellus sharpi 25809 Dromius spilotus 20404 Carabus clathratus 21601 Miscodera arctica 22343 Bembidion prasinum
    [Show full text]
  • (Donacia Crassipes Fabricius, 1775), Aquarell Von Alexander Von Peez
    © Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Seerosen-Schilfkäfer (Donacia crassipes Fabricius, 1775), Aquarell von Alexander von Peez. © Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck download unter www.biologiezentrum.at FünFter Beitrag zur KäFerFauna nordtirols ergänzung zu den bisher erschienenen faunistischen arbeiten über die Käfer nordtirols (1950, 1971, 1976 und 1987) Manfred Kahlen AbstrAct Eine Vollständigkeit kann in der Dynamik der biologischen Forschung ohnehin nie erreicht werden. Es werden pri- A preliminary supplement to the previous faunistic publica- mär solche Ergänzungen dargestellt, welche aus eigenen tions on the beetles of Nordtirol (1950, 1971, 1976, 1987) is Aufsammlungen und aus Beiträgen von Kolleginnen und provided. In all, 270 additional taxa are listed and 75 previ- Kollegen in der Datenbank „biooffice“ der Naturwissen- ously recorded taxa are deleted. Thus, at present, 4340 taxa schaftlichen Sammlungen erfasst sind. Dazu kommen einige are currently known from the region. Recent nomenclatural Sammellisten von verlässlichen Kollegen des Auslandes und changes are accounted for in the species list. Angaben aus ad hoc bekannter Literatur. Daten aus (reichlich vorhandenen) Projektarbeiten, naturkundlichen Gutachten, Key words: Coleoptera, faunistic records, North Tyrol, Austria Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen etc. wurden nicht erhoben, insbesondere aus Gründen des Zeitlimits, welches solche Recherchen einschließlich Plausibilitätsprüfung der Angaben EinlEitung nicht zuließ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Beetles (Carabidae) of Priory Water NR, Leicestershire
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY The ground beetles (Carabidae) of Priory Water NR, Leicestershire 1 2 Tony Cook & Frank Clark LESOPS 30 (December 2013) ISSN 0957 - 1019 1Barnwood Cottage, Main Street, Slawston, Market Harborough LE16 7UF ([email protected]) 2Bank Cottage, 4 Main Street, Houghton on the Hill LE7 9GD ([email protected]) LESOPS 30 (2013) Ground beetles 2 Introduction Ground beetles (Carabidae) have been widely used for ecological studies and are the subject of numerous publications. The family forms a well-defined taxonomic group that can be easily recognized on the basis of a combination of anatomical features that include a characteristic body shape, eleven-segmented filiform (thread-like) antennae and five- segmented tarsi on all pairs of legs. Ground beetles are often uniformly dark in colour, although some species, especially those that are day-active, are more brightly coloured and variously patterned. Identification keys to British species of Carabidae have been available for many years (for example; Joy; 1932; Lindroth, 1974) and the taxonomy has been extensively revised in a recently published key by Luff (2007). Additional aids to identification can be found on-line (e.g. http://markgtelfer.co.uk/beetles). Ground beetles are very active, fast running beetles and many species are predators of smaller invertebrates. Their study has benefitted from the use of pitfall traps (see below in methods) although the technique has to be used with an awareness of the bias that may be present in the data obtained (Greenslade, 1964). Research into the carabid communities of different habitats (e.g. Pollard, 1968), the population ecology of particular species (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Survey Report
    Appendix A Invertebrate Survey Report INVERTEBRATE SURVEY OF NORTHSTOWE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE MARK G. TELFER 16TH SEPTEMBER 2013 VERSION 2: 18TH OCTOBER 2013 THIS REPORT WAS PRODUCED FOR OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LTD. Dr. Mark G. Telfer 10, Northall Road Eaton Bray DUNSTABLE LU6 2DQ [email protected] http://markgtelfer.co.uk/ This report should be quoted as: Telfer, M.G. (2013). Invertebrate survey of Northstowe, Cambridgeshire. Version 2. Report for Ove Arup and Partners Ltd. Invertebrate survey of Northstowe Contents 1 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 ECOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 LEGISLATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS ......................................................................................................... 5 2.4 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................................. 6 3 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Fertilizer and Land-Use Type on Soil Properties and Ground Beetle Communities
    Bulletin of Insectology 65 (2): 239-246, 2012 ISSN 1721-8861 Effects of fertilizer and land-use type on soil properties and ground beetle communities 1 1 2 1 Wojciech SĄDEJ , Agnieszka KOSEWSKA , Wiera SĄDEJ , Mariusz NIETUPSKI 1Department of Phytopathology and Entomology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland 2Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland Abstract Among the most important factors influencing the properties of soil are the type of soil management and fertilization. Agronomic technologies, such as undifferentiated fertilization, or fallow and set-aside breaks have a significant, although not always positive effect on soil properties. They can stimulate humus degradation in soil, the leaching of nutrients and accumulation of weed seeds, pathogens and pests in soil. Being a very useful component of biocenoses, carabid fauna is a particularly valuable group of ani- mals. They are very sensitive to changes in habitat quality and are therefore commonly used as environmental indicators. Because of their predatory polyphagous nutrition, they can be treated as an important component of natural environmental resistance. This paper discusses the species composition of Carabidae communities found on experimental plots maintained under identical, undif- ferentiated fertilization but managed differently. Relationships between selected physicochemical soil properties under long-term fertilization or soil fallowing and the composition of carabid communities were analyzed. Significantly more carabid individuals were found in the fallows compared to the experimental plots. The Shannon index indicated that treatments with a higher content of organic carbon and total nitrogen had a higher diversity. Carabidae preferred the treatments where the soil had lower pH.
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Laufkäferfauna (Col., Carabidae) Diplopoda) As Influenced by Habitat Qualities of Afforested Mine Sites
    Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde, Band 80: 23-80, Münster 2015 VOIGTLÄNDER, K. & B. BALKENHOL (2006): Studies on millipede assemblages (Myriapoda, Zur Laufkäferfauna (Col., Carabidae) Diplopoda) as influenced by habitat qualities of afforested mine sites. – Norwegian Journal of Entomology 53: 345-360. ausgewählter Flussuferabschnitte des VOIGTLÄNDER, K. (2007): Die Myriapoden (Diplopoda, Chilopoda) aus Fallenfängen im Höglwald/Bayern. – Schubartiana 2: 13-20. Naturschutzgebiets „Lippeaue Selm“ VOIGTLÄNDER, K. (2008): Tausendfüßer, Doppelfüßer (Diplopoda). – In: Arten- und Biotop- (Nordrhein-Westfalen, Kreis Unna) schutzprogramm Sachsen-Anhalt. Biologische Vielfalt und FFH-Management im Landschaftsraum Saale-Unstrut-Triasland. Berichte des Landesamtes für Umwelt- schutz Sachsen-Anhalt, Sonderheft 1: 217-220. Karsten Hannig (Waltrop), Jörg Drewenskus (Dortmund), VOIGTLÄNDER, K. (2011): Preferences of common Central European millipedes for different Matthias Erfmann (Waltrop) und Johanna Oellers (Waltrop) biotope types (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany). – International Journal of Myriapodology 6: 61-83. VOIGTLÄNDER, K. (2013): Chilopoda und Diplopoda (Hundert- und Doppelfüßer) – In: Entomofaunistische Untersuchungen im südöstlichen Unterharz. – Entomologische Zusammenfassung Mitteilungen Sachsen-Anhalt 21 (1): 21-27. VOIGTLÄNDER, K., DECKER, P., BURKHARDT, U. & J. SPELDA (Im Druck): The present Im Rahmen einer ehrenamtlichen bodenzoologischen Effizienzkontrolle wurde knowledge of the Symphyla and Pauropoda
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Adventive Species of Coleoptera (Insecta) Recorded from Canada
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256690937 Synopsis of adventive species of Coleoptera (Insecta) recorded from Canada. Part 1: Carabidae. Book · March 2012 CITATIONS READS 5 195 7 authors, including: Jan Klimaszewski David Langor Natural Resources Canada Natural Resources Canada 669 PUBLICATIONS 2,164 CITATIONS 292 PUBLICATIONS 3,787 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Julie-Anne Dorval Christopher George Majka Université du Québec à Rimouski UQAR Nova Scotia Museum 104 PUBLICATIONS 42 CITATIONS 150 PUBLICATIONS 1,294 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Aleocharine beetles of eastern Canada View project Pacific Northwest insect diversity studies View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jan Klimaszewski on 27 July 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Synopsis of adventive species of Coleoptera (Insecta) recorded from Canada Part 1: Carabidae Synopsis of adventive species of Coleoptera (Insecta) recorded from Canada Part 1: Carabidae by Jan Klimaszewski, David Langor, Ricky Batista, Julie-Anne Duval, Christopher G. Majka, Geoff G.E. Scudder & Yves Bousquet Sofia–Moscow 2012 Synopsis of adventive species of Coleoptera (Insecta) recorded from Canada. Part 1: Carabidae by Jan Klimaszewski 1, David Langor 2, Ricky Batista 3, Julie-Anne Duval 4, Christopher G. Majka 5, Geoff G.E. Scudder 6 & Yves Bousquet 7 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian
    [Show full text]