DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Army Engineer Center and Fort Belvoir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Army Engineer Center and Fort Belvoir THE M AG AZI NE FOR ARMY ENGINEERS FALL 1980 /~ .. , ,1'iI c.<;'irUi,f,... ., Digging More Effective -.f Tank & TOW (;!.t!Jj Defensive Positions UNITED STATES ARMY ENGINEER CENTER AND FORT BELVOIR COMMANDER/COMMANDANT MG Max W. Noah CHIEF OF STAFF/DEPUTY INSTALLATION COMMANDER COL Thomas M. McClelland ASSISTANT COMMANDANT COL Robert M. Bunker COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR CSM Frederick I. Eisenbart, Jr. DIRECTORATES DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING LTC Stan ley R. Johnson DIRECTORATE OF COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS COL Philip R. Hoge DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING DEVELOPMENTS COL John W. Devens DIRECTORATE OF EVALUATION MAJ(P) Terrance C. Ryan UNITS ENGINEER TRAINING BRIGADE COL James H. King, Jr. ENGINEER CENTER BRIGADE COL David O. Cooksey THE COVER . ~ EDITOR Better concealment and greater Englneer Jerome J. Hill killing effectiveness of antitank weapons are possible by digging defensive pos itions deeper and STAFF WRITER facing them alternately left and SPS Mary Vitek . right to take advantage of flan k shots, as illustrated on the cover ILLUSTRATORS by Ron Perkins . For details, see Bill Ruth Captain Eric T. Mogren's article Alma Thaxton beginn ing on page 10. Ron Perkins PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER MAJ Sandor I. Ketzis Englneer - PC:? _____________ _ _ _ _ .:...:T.:...:Hc::E....:-M.:..:;AGAZINE FOR ARMY ENGINEERS lJOLUME: 10 FALL 1980 NUMDE:R J FEATURES 10 DIGGING MORE EFFECTIVE TANK & TOW DEFENSIVE POSITIONS by Captai n Eric T. Mogren 13 PROJE CT KRYPTONITE by Captain Norman G. Comstock 16 THE DIVISION ENGINEER IN THE GERMAN ARMY by Lieutenant Colonel Juergen M. Erbe page 13 18 THE TERRAIN ANALY SIS CENTE R by Captain David R. Gallay 20 THE 20TH ENGINEER BRIGADE 24 ROAD CRATERS- TECHNICAL & TACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS by Captain Robert D. Volz 32 THE NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER by CSM (Ret) Johnny W. Greek DEPARTMENTS 4 NEWS & NOTES 38 ENLISTED CA REER INFO 8 FORUM 39 THE SCHOOL SOLUTION 35 ENGINEER PROBLEM 40 OFFICER CAREER INFO 36 RESERVE CO MPONENTS ENGINEER IS an autho riz ed publication of t he US Arm y Engineer Cent er an d Fort Belvoir , VA , Unl ess sp ecifically stated , mat erial app earin g herein does not necess ari ly rel lec t offi ci al poli cy , trun kmq , or endo rsement by any age ncy of th e US Arm y All ph ot og raph s containe d he rein are o lhctal USArmy ph ot ogr aph s un less otherw ise cred ited . Use of funds fo r pri nting th is pu blica tio n was appro ve d by Hea dquarter s , De part · ment 0 1 th e Army , on Febr uary 23. 1979 Mat eri al herein may be reprinted if c redit IS gi ven to ENGINEER and th e au th or . • ENGINEER OBJECTIVES are to p rovid e a foru m for the exc hange of idea s, to inform and motivate , and to pr omot e th e pr ot essi onat dev elo pment o f all mem ber s 0 1 the Arm y enq mee r family . • DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE w it h ENG INEE R IS au thon zed and en co uraged . Inqu iries, le tters to the aortor. manuscripts, ph ot ographs, an d general correspond ence sh oul d be sent to : Edit or . EN GINEER Ma gaZine, US Arm y Engine er Cente r, For t 8 el voir, VA 22060 Tel eph on e AUT OVON 354-500 1 or Co mmercial 703 -66 4,3 082/5001 If a return of manu scripts or mat erial IS d es rrec, a s elt-addressed stam pe d enve lo pe is requited . • SUBSCRIPTIONS to ENGINEE R are ava ila ble through th e Supe rintende nt of Docum ent s , US Government Printing Offi c e, Washington , D.C 2040 2 . A check or money orde r, payable to Superintend ent of Docum ents. mu st accompany all subscripti on re qu ests. Subsc riptio n rates are $5 50 for domestic (includ ing AP O and FP O) addr esses , and $6 90 fo r for ei gn add resse s. Individual copies are avarl­ ab le at $3 25 per copy for domestic addr esses and $ 4 10 for fo reign addr esses . • CONTROLLED CIRCULATION postage pai d at W ashington , D.C . NEWS,8z: NOTES ENGINEER HOTLINE The US Army Engineer School at Fort Belvoir, VA , has a telephone HOTLINE to help provide answers for specific Army Engineer problems in the field . If you experience problems related to engineer doctrine, TOE organization, MOS, equipment, manuals, training and/or training de­ velopment, call the HOTUNE number, AUTO­ VON 354-3646 or COMMERCIAL 703-664-3646. A recorded message will ask you to identify your­ self by name , unit, unit address, and unit tele­ phone number. Then you will be required to iden­ tify the subject area of your problem and state the problem as clearly as possible. Subject matter ex­ perts within The Engineer School will then be contacted about your problem and return your call . HOTLINE has responded to an average of about 20 calls a month during the last year. If you have a problem, call the Engineer HOTLINE . NEW CHIEF OF ENGINEERS Lieutenant General Joseph K. Bratton will become the Army 's 45th Chief of Engineers on WEST POINT WOMEN CHOOSE ENGINEERS October I . He will succeed Lieutenant General The first women to graduate from the United States John W , Morris, who retires September 30 . Military Acad emy at We st Point include s ix engineers Bratton has served as Deputy Chief of Engineers currently enrolled in the Engineer Officer Basi c Course since August I , He was the division engineer of at The Engineer School , Fort Belv oir , VA . They were the Corps of Engineers' South Atlantic Division at among the 61 women commissioned as second lieuten­ ants during graduation ceremo nies at West Po int in Atlanta, GA , prior to August l. June . The six precedent-setting engineer lieutenants in­ Bratton's command assignments have included clude Brigid Benya, Bobbi L. Fiedler, Kathleen M . the 24th Engineer Battalion with the 4th Arm ored Gerard, Clare Kirb y. Debra M . Merriken, and Caro l A . Division in Europe, and the 159th Engineer Group Young. Benya and Kirby have been as signed to the in Vietnam. 130th Engineer Brigade, US AREUR, foll owing EOBC, while Young has been assi gned to the 7th Engi necr Hi s staff assignments have included director of Brigade , USAR EUR . The other three will report to military application for the Department of Energy; stat eside commands foll owing completion of EOBC­ chief of nuclear activities, Supreme Headquarters , Fiedler to the 937(h Engineer Group , Fort Riley, KS : USAREUR; executive to the Supreme Allied Gerard to the 20th Engineer Brigade, Fort Bragg , NC ; Command in Europe; secretary to the Joint Chiefs and Merriken 10 the 36th Engineer Group, Fort Ben ­ ning , GA . of Staff; and military assistant to the Secretary of the Army. He has also served in the War Plans Division. Plans Directorate, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Military Operations; and with the Division of Reactor Development, Atomic Energy Commission . 2 co n~i n u ed NOAH SUCCEEDS KELLY Maj or Gen eral Ma x W . Noah has succeede d Major Gener al James L . Kell y as Commanding Ge neral of the US Army Eng ineer Ce nter a nd Commandant of the US Army En ­ ginee r Scho ol at Fort Belvoir, VA . MG Kelly retires from act ive service on September 30 aft er a distinguished 30- year military career. MG Noah last served as Div ision Engi neer for the Cor ps of Eng ineers' Huntsville Div ision in Huntsville , AL. He was previ ou sly assigned to the US Arm y Trainin g and Doctrine Co mmand at Fort Monroe, VA. as Deputy Chi ef of Staff for Resource Ma nage me nt. MG Noah is a 195 3 graduate of the SOLDIERS EARN OLYMPIC MEDALLIONS US Military Ac adem y at West Point. In 1958 he recei ved a master ' s de­ Display ing official Olympic med alli ons they received for the ir part gree in electrical engineering at Pur­ in the Winter Olympics at Lake Placid , NY , are SP6 Clark 1. Hein­ due Univer sity. He also is a graduate kel , SFC Joseph T. Tcnschert , and SP6 Marshall R . Thacker. All of the Arm y Comm and and General three are members of Team C, 535 th Engineer Detachment, Fort St aff Co llege, the Arm y War Col­ Eustis, VA . They assisted in providing backup electrical power at lege , and the In st itute of Defen se La ke Placid in Febru ary. Th eir per form ance also earned them cer­ Analys is . tifi cate s of apprec iatio n from the Secre tary of Defense. MG Noah 's 27-y ea r military care er inc l udes two tours in Korea ( 1954-55 . 1973· 74) , a tour as chi ef of operations for the 18th Enginee r Brigade in Vietn am ( 1966-67) , and a tour as co mma nde r of the 307th Air­ NEW BORE CLEANER borne Engineer Batt alion , 82nd Air ­ borne Division , at Fort Bragg, NC A ne w product, now available to unit s through the national mili­ ( 1968-70). tary supply system, not only breaks loose grit , rust , salt, etc., from The Greensboro , NC, native is a metal surfaces but also lubricates and preser ves them by providing a regi ster ed pr ofessional e ng inee r in long-l astin g thin film prote ctive coating .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Personal Viewpoint by Cpr William J
    \C!a B~!!>GIJ\ro BOOK A Personal Viewpoint by CPr William J. Stein he true test of a technical manual sandbar. The ice was excavated to the construction must be included m a is its usefulness in a practical field river bottom in the major channels, T rewrite of TM 5-349. situation. A true test of TM 5-349, Arc­ both across the channels and parallel tic Construction, came when the 23rd Ice Profile to the flow. Bailey bridges and M-4T6 Engineer Company (CBT) (HVY), Fort The next step in ice bridging is pro­ bridge sections were stockpiled to put Richardson, was tasked to build the filing the ice which TM 5-349 addresses across the channels ifthe water started main supply route for the joint train­ in general terms only. The reader is left flowing above the ground. ing exercise, "Brim Frost '83" in cen­ guessing where to place the profile Reinforcement tral Alaska. holes, how to estimate the load-bearing Calculations showed that the ice capacity for different types of ice, and Site Selection bridges over the four channels needed what to do with ice frozen solid to the The first task was to bridge the Delta to be 8 inches thicker. The TM's section river bottom or unsupported by water. River. This required choosing a site for on "Reinforced Crossings" says to clear The load-bearing capacity for ice is an ice bridge. Site considerations are the snow cover, but says nothing about given in table XIV of TM 5-349. Unfor­ covered in the "Ice Bridges" section of the snow berms on the edge of the ice tunately, this table does not say which TM 5-349.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Prepared for Unprecedented Times Peter Layton
    Being prepared for unprecedented times National mobilisation conceptualisations and their implications Peter Layton 1 2 3 BEING PREPARED FOR UNPRECEDENTED TIMES National mobilisation conceptualisations and their implications Peter Layton 3 About the Griffith Asia Institute The Griffith Asia Institute (GAI) is an internationally recognised research centre in the Griffith Business School. We reflect Griffith University’s longstanding commitment and future aspirations for the study of and engagement with nations of Asia and the Pacific. At GAI, our vision is to be the informed voice leading Australia’s strategic engagement in the Asia Pacific— cultivating the knowledge, capabilities and connections that will inform and enrich Australia’s Asia-Pacific future. We do this by: i) conducting and supporting excellent and relevant research on the politics, security, economies and development of the Asia-Pacific region; ii) facilitating high level dialogues and partnerships for policy impact in the region; iii) leading and informing public debate on Australia’s place in the Asia Pacific; and iv) shaping the next generation of Asia-Pacific leaders through positive learning experiences in the region. Visit us at: www.griffith.edu.au/asiainstitute About the publication This paper has been developed with the support of the Directorate of Mobilisation, Force Design Division within the Australian Department of Defence. Mobilisation involves civil society, emergency services and all levels of government. The sharing of the research undertaken aims to encourage informed community debate. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Australian Government or the Department of Defence, or any part thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 3-90.12/Mcwp 3-17.1 (Fm 90-13) Combined Arms Gap
    FM 3-90.12/MCWP 3-17.1 (FM 90-13) COMBINED ARMS GAP-CROSSING OPERATIONS July 2008 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online <www.us.army.mil> and the General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at <www.train.army.mil>. *FM 3-90.12/MCWP 3-17.1 (FM 90-13) Field Manual No. Headquarters 3-90.12/MCWP 3-17.1 (FM 90-13) Department of the Army Washington, DC, 1 July 2008 COMBINED ARMS GAP-CROSSING OPERATIONS Contents Page PREFACE ............................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................x Chapter 1 OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF GAP CROSSING ......................................... 1-1 Challenge to Maneuver ...................................................................................... 1-1 Integrating Assured Mobility ............................................................................... 1-2 Gap-Crossing Operations................................................................................... 1-4 Chapter 2 OVERVIEW OF GAP-CROSSING OPERATIONS............................................ 2-1 Gap Crossing as a Functional Area of Mobility Operations ............................... 2-1 Gap-Crossing Means ......................................................................................... 2-4 Gap-Crossing Fundamentals ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 (NGRER FY 2018) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2017 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $896,000 in Fiscal Years 2016–2017. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $684,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017Feb15 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges (Operational & Strategic Reserve Forces) 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-7 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-8 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-11 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Army Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-3 F. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 G. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-6 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Corps' Top Leaders Visit Marines
    Dec. 31, 2010 Volume 2 Issue 30 Corps’ top leaders visit Marines Story and Photos by Cpl. Shannon McMillan 1st MLG (FWD) CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan – The Commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. James F. Amos, accompanied by the Corps’ top enlisted Marine, Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps Carlton Kent, visited Marines and sailors of I Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) at Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan, Dec. 23. Amos and Kent addressed the Ma- rines and sailors during a town-hall meet- ing where they discussed the progress Marines are making in Afghanistan. “Everybody knows it’s been a tough fight in Sangin, but we are going to look back the same way we look back at Mar- jah,” said Amos of the former Taliban Commandant of the Marine Corps James F. Amos and Sergeant Major of stronghold that has seen significant prog- the Marine Corps Carlton W. Kent, address a crowd of Marines and sailors ress since Marines began major opera- at Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan, Dec. 23. Amos and Kent visited to say tions there in February. thank you to all the troops who are supporting the International Security Assistance Force and to wish them a Merry Christmas. See COMMANDANT, Page 2 Marines remembered for dedication, sacrifice Story and photos by Cpl. Shannon McMillan 1st MLG (FWD) CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan – More than 150 service members bowed their heads in silence and paid their final respects here, Dec. 26, to two Marines who dedicated their lives to eliminating the larg- est threat on today’s battlefield, improvised explosive devices. Sgt. Jason T.
    [Show full text]
  • Yankee Engineer Volume 40, No
    Message from Division Engineer....3 Wheeler Award........................................4 West Thompson Earth Day................5 Take Your Reese Morgan Retirement..................6 Bruce Daughters Yatsevitch Retirement...........................10 Zawacki and Sons to Charles River Cleanup Plan...............12 Retirement Work Day Ten Mile River..............................................13 Page 8 Page 18 Town Meeting...........................................16 US Army Corps of Engineers New England District Yankee Engineer Volume 40, No. 8 May 2005 District command to change hands in July: Col. Koning will pass District command flag to Col. Thalken Director in the Department of Civil and Col. Thomas Koning will Mechanical Engineering, U.S. Military relinquish command of the Academy at West Point, N.Y. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, From 1996 to 2000 his positions New England District, to Col. included, Assistant Operations Officer (S-3) and then Operations Officer (S-3) Curtis L. Thalken during a for the 130th Engineer Brigade, Hanau, Change of Command cer- Germany; Contingency Plans Officer at emony scheduled for Friday, Headquarters USAREUR and 7th Army, July 8, at 10 a.m., at historical and Assistant Corps Engineer, V Corps, both in Heidelberg, Germany. Faneuil Hall in Boston, Mass. Following that tour, Col. Thalken Col. Thalken is a native of Ne- became Commander, 92nd Engineer braska. He is a graduate from the United Combat Battalion (Heavy), Fort Stewart, States Military Academy, at West Point, Ga., and deployed the battalion to Af- with a Bachelor’s Degree in Engineer- ghanistan and surrounding countries ing. from November 2001 until June 2002; He received a Masters Degree in he then served as an Experimentation Engineering Sciences from the Thayer Officer, Joint Concept Development School of Engineering at Dartmouth Photo by C.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Future
    +(@ +(03@ MERCREDI 13 JUIN WEDNESDAY 13 JUNE La résistance du soudage par friction page 5 Confronting Black Eagle is designed for the future ISTAR missions page 30 heinmetall Defence has Rheinmetall’s Stabilised Electro- suspension system developed by Rchosen Eurosatory to launch Optical Sight System and Acoustic Australian company Supashock. the latest version of its private Shooter Location System, and an A key feature of the KF41 is venture Lynx KF41 tracked electronic architecture and battle a common drive module and infantry fighting vehicle (IFV). management system. a flexible mission module, The KF41 is fitted with the The basic hull is of welded which allows the end user latest Lance 2.0 turret, armed with steel, to which a modular armour to reconfigure the vehicle in the Wotan 35 dual-feed cannon, package and internal spall eight hours to meet changing which fires standard 35x228mm liners are fitted. Survivability is operational requirements, such ammunition with a 7.62mm enhanced by the installation of as armoured personnel carrier, Sophie Ultima, jumelles coaxial machine gun. A unique a hard kill active defence system ambulance, command post “Quatre-en-un” feature of the Lance 2.0 turret is and the Rosy multispectral 360° vehicle and recovery vehicle. page 24 that it has a flexible mission pod smoke/obscurant system. The first example of the Lynx fitted either side, which allows The KF41 has a gross vehicle has taken part in the competition for the installation of subsystems, weight of about 44 tonnes, with to supply the Czech Republic &0, '()(1&( including two Spike anti-tank a stretch potential to 50 tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • MCEA Newsletter 20109.Pmd
    ENGINEERS UP! 2010 Newsletter Engineers Up! - 1 2 - Engineers Up! 2010 Newsletter Contents PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE ................................................................................ 4 ELECTED OFFICIALS........................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS .............................................................. 6 UPDATE FROM ASSOCIATE DIRECTORS ....................................................... 8 LIEUTENANT GENERAL PANTER .................................................................... 9 MAJOR GENERAL WISSLER .......................................................................... 10 HONOR ROLL .................................................................................................. 11 IN MEMORY ..................................................................................................... 12 FELLOWS......................................................................................................... 17 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES............................................................................... 18 BUSINESS MEETING ...................................................................................... 20 CORPORATE MEMBERS ................................................................................ 23 FINANCIAL REPORT ....................................................................................... 24 2009 REUNION ................................................................................................ 26 2009
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Engineers Journal
    THE ROYAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL Vol LXXXIV SEPTEMBER 1970 No s Centenary Number l I 233 INSTITUTION OF RE OFFICE COPY PUBLISI 'S DO NOT z0 REMOVE ch. v - ,..,---.....-- _____.___.. _ / ....- M' THE COUNCIL OP THEINDtTONQ F ROYAL ENGINEERS ' ' Pmron-~oEa MAJSSTY THE QUEEN .; PreuWwt .*m M , .M mtd'Slr.ae,.ik,fO,B,kC,.4 f'KG,O-L -si. .... &m Vlce-Preddents Majo-General R. L. Clutterbqck, OBE, MA, C E FICE ......... ... 196 1 Brigadier M. L. Crothwait, MBE, MA. C Eng. MICE MIUM ....... ... ... 1970 Elected Members Colonel B. A. E Maude, MBE, MA ... ... ... ... ... 1968 Colonel J. R. de G. Pllkington, OBE, MC, BSc, C Eng, MICE ... ... 1968 Malor-General F. W. J. Cowtan, MBE, MC* ... ... ... ... ... 1969 Brigadier A. F.Leslie, MBE ............... ..1969 ,1969P Colonel M. J. A. Campbell, MBE, MC, BA ...... ... ... Captain D. H. Hillard, RE ... ... ... ... ... 1969 ... 1970 Major D. McCarthy, MM, RE, AMBIM ......... ... 1970 I Colonel W. C. S. Harrison, CBE, ERD, ADC, C Eng, FICE, MIHE Brigadier A. E. Arnold, OBE, BSc ... ... ... ... Brigadier P. J. M. Pellereau, MA, C Eng, FIMechE, MBIM .... Brigadier B. G. Rawlins, MA, FIPlantE ... ... ... ... 1970 Brigadier O. McC. Roome ... ... ... ... ... ... 1970 Colonel B. C. Elgood, MBE, BA ............ 1970 Colonel C. P. Campbell, AMBIM ............ .. 1970 Major W. M. R. Addison, RE, BSc ............ ., j Ex-Officio Members Brigadier M. G. Stevens, MBE ... ... ... ... ... ... D/E-in-C Colonel H. R. D. Hart, BSc, MBIM ... ... ... ... ... AAG RE Brigadier S. E. M. Goodall, OBE, MC, BSc ... ... ... ... Comdt RSME Brigadier A. Walmesley-White, MA, FRICS ... ... ... ... D Survey Colonel R. R.Crooks ... ... ... ... ... ... ... )/Comdt RSME :, Brigadier A. G. C. Jones, MC, BA ..
    [Show full text]
  • Quieting the Boom : the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator and the Quest for Quiet Supersonic Flight / Lawrence R
    Lawrence R. Benson Lawrence R. Benson Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Benson, Lawrence R. Quieting the boom : the shaped sonic boom demonstrator and the quest for quiet supersonic flight / Lawrence R. Benson. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Sonic boom--Research--United States--History. 2. Noise control-- Research--United States--History. 3. Supersonic planes--Research--United States--History. 4. High-speed aeronautics--Research--United States-- History. 5. Aerodynamics, Supersonic--Research--United States--History. I. Title. TL574.S55B36 2013 629.132’304--dc23 2013004829 Copyright © 2013 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. ISBN 978-1-62683-004-2 90000> 9 781626 830042 Preface and Acknowledgments v Introduction: A Pelican Flies Cross Country ix Chapter 1: Making Shock Waves: The Proliferation and Testing of Sonic Booms ............................. 1 Exceeding Mach 1 A Swelling Drumbeat of Sonic Booms Preparing for an American Supersonic Transport Early Flight Testing Enter the Valkyrie and the Blackbird The National Sonic Boom Evaluation Last of the Flight Tests Chapter 2: The SST’s Sonic Boom Legacy ..................................................... 39 Wind Tunnel Experimentation Mobilizing
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2017
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 (NGRER FY 2017) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2016 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Michael A. Lockwood, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $870,000 in Fiscal Years 2015–2016. This includes $200,000 in expenses and $670,000 in DOD labor. Generated on 2016Jan29 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Purpose 1-1 II. Strategic Concept 1-1 III. Equipping the Reserves 1-1 IV. Challenges 1-2 V. Scope of the Report 1-3 VI. Equipment Shortages 1-4 VII. Equipment Procurement 1-5 VIII. The Reserve Components’ Equipping Concerns 1-7 A. The Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. The Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. The United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-9 D. The United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. The Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. The Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. The United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-10 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-1 C. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-4 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-6 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-7 A.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2022 Budget Overview
    Preface The Overview Book has been published as part of the President’s Annual Defense Budget for the past few years. From FY 1969 to FY 2005, OSD published the “Annual Defense Report” (ADR) to meet 10 USC section 113 requirements. Subsequently, the Overview began to fill this role. The Overview is one part of an extensive set of materials that constitute the presentation and justification of the President’s Budget for FY 2022. This document and all other publications for this and previous DoD budgets are available from the public web site of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller): http://comptroller.defense.gov. The Press Release and Budget Briefing, often referred to as the “Budget Rollout,” and the Program Acquisition Costs by Weapons System book, which includes summary details on major DoD acquisition programs (i.e., aircraft, ground forces programs, shipbuilding, space systems, etc.) are especially relevant. The website for Performance Improvement tables and charts is https://cmo.defense.gov/Publications/Annual-Performance-Plan-and-Performance-Report/. Other background information can be accessed at www.defense.gov. The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $31,000 for the 2021 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses a nd $18,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2021May19 RefID: 4-93DCDF7 i This page intentionally left blank ii Overview – FY 2022 Defense Budget Table of Contents 1. FY 2022 Budget Summary 1-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Interim National Security Strategic Guidance – Renewing America’s Advantages .............. 1-3 FY 2022 Budget Request Overview ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]