DOCSLIB.ORG

National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2017 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 (NGRER FY 2017) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2016 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Michael A. Lockwood, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $870,000 in Fiscal Years 2015–2016. This includes $200,000 in expenses and $670,000 in DOD labor. Generated on 2016Jan29 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Purpose 1-1 II. Strategic Concept 1-1 III. Equipping the Reserves 1-1 IV. Challenges 1-2 V. Scope of the Report 1-3 VI. Equipment Shortages 1-4 VII. Equipment Procurement 1-5 VIII. The Reserve Components’ Equipping Concerns 1-7 A. The Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. The Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. The United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-9 D. The United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. The Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. The Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. The United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-10 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-1 C. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-4 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-6 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-7 A. Current Status of the Army National Guard 2-7 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 2-15 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 2-16 D. Summary 2-21 Table 1: ARNG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ARNG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ARNG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ARNG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ARNG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ARNG FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ARNG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ARNG Significant Major Item Shortages i III. United States Army Reserve Overview 2-22 A. Current Status of the Army Reserve 2-22 B. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 2-27 C. Summary 2-36 Table 1: USAR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USAR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USAR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USAR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USAR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USAR FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USAR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USAR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 3 United States Marine Corps Reserve I. Marine Corps Overview 3-1 A. Marine Corps Planning Guidance 3-1 B. Marine Corps Equipping Policy 3-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 3-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 3-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 3-2 II. Marine Corps Reserve Overview 3-3 A. Current Status of the Marine Corps Reserve 3-3 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 3-5 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 3-5 D. Summary 3-8 Table 1: USMCR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USMCR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USMCR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USMCR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USMCR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USMCR FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USMCR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USMCR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 4 United States Navy Reserve I. Navy Overview 4-1 A. Navy Planning Guidance 4-1 B. Navy Equipping Policy 4-2 C. Plan to Fill Reserve Component Equipment Mobilization Requirements 4-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 4-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 4-5 ii II. Navy Reserve Overview 4-6 A. Current Status of the Navy Reserve 4-6 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 4-15 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 4-15 D. Summary 4-16 Table 1: USNR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USNR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USNR Service Procurement Program Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USNR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USNR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USNR FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USNR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USNR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 5 United States Air Reserve Components I. United States Air Force Overview 5-1 A. Air Force Planning Guidance 5-1 B. Air Force Equipping Policy 5-2 C. Plan to Fill Modernization Shortages in the RC 5-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 5-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 5-4 II. Air National Guard Overview 5-5 A. Current Status of the Air National Guard 5-5 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-17 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 5-18 D. Summary 5-19 Table 1: ANG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ANG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ANG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ANG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ANG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ANG FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ANG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ANG Significant Major Item Shortages III. Air Force Reserve Overview 5-20 A. Current Status of the Air Force Reserve 5-20 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-31 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 5-32 D. Summary 5-33 Table 1: AFR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: AFR Average Age of Equipment iii Table 3: AFR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: AFR NGREA Procurements Table 5: AFR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: AFR FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: AFR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: AFR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 6 United States Coast Guard Reserve I. Coast Guard Overview 6-1 A. Coast Guard Planning Guidance 6-2 B. Coast Guard Equipping Policy 6-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 6-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 6-3 II. Coast Guard Reserve Overview 6-4 A. Current Status of the Coast Guard Reserve 6-4 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 6-6 C. Future Years Program (FY 2017–FY 2019) 6-6 D. Summary 6-7 Table 1: USCGR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USCGR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USCGR Service Procurement Program- Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USCGR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USCGR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USCGR FY 2013 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USCGR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USCGR Significant Major Item Shortages Appendix A: Report Requirements, Terminology, and Definitions Appendix B: National Guard Equipment Reporting Requirements Appendix C: Points of Contact Appendix D: Acronym Glossary iv Chapter 1 Overview I. Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide Congress with an in-depth look at the equipping needs and concerns of the Nation’s Reserve Components (RC). Mandated in section 10541 of Title 10, United States Code, the report is a statutory requirement that reflects Congressional interest in ensuring a well-equipped and robust RC capability within the Armed Forces. The National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) identifies major items of equipment in the RC inventories that are important to the Services, DOD, and Congress, and also outlines Reserve equipment shortfalls and acquisitions for the FY 2017 budget year and the two succeeding years. Data on equipment included in the report consist of high-value, mission-essential equipment requirements, critical equipment shortages, Service procurements, supplemental funding for the RC, and items procured with National Guard and Reserve Equipment Appropriation (NGREA) funding. The FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act directed new equipment reporting requirements for the National Guard’s capability to perform its Federal responsibilities in response to an emergency or major disaster. This guidance is highlighted in its entirety in Appendix A, and the National Guard Bureau responds to the requirements in Appendix B. II. Strategic Context As we continue to examine what the force of the future will be, we must understand that our Nation cannot meet current or future contingency demands without our Reserve forces. They are continually looked at as “first responders” to national needs and are fully integrated into contingency planning. Without question RC Service men and women have been called to serve in every major conflict in our Nation’s history. Since WWII RC personnel have been activated to meet our Nation’s conflicts. Desert Storm saw the call up of some 230,000 Reserve and National Guard personnel. Now more than 15 years into continuous conflict in Afghanistan and the Middle East, with the mobilization of another 920,000 RC personnel, the culture of using Reserves as an operational force has been inculcated into our societal and military psyche. Moving forward, we must ensure that the RC is equipped and funded to remain a key enabler in the force of the future. III. Equipping the Reserves The Active Component (AC) has historically looked to the RC for fiscal relief during periods of shrinking budgets. To ensure readiness and relevance as operational forces in support of combatant commands and civil authorities as directed, modernizing, maintaining, and sustaining equipment needs to remain a top tier priority for RC and AC leaders.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ready to Roll Enlisted Aircrew Members Are Critical to C-130 Hercules Flight Testing
    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 4 August 2019 Ready to Roll Enlisted Aircrew Members are Critical to C-130 Hercules Flight Testing Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC NEW LEADERS POISED TO ENHANCING TRUST IS DO GREAT THINGS FOR THE FIRST STEP THE COMMAND TO REFORMING THE The success of any organization and deploying ORGANIZATION depends on its leaders. The Air Force in support of Reserve is comprised of numerous units, U.S. Central In my last commentary, I rolled out three individual lines of and each has its own set of leaders. Some Command. effort – comprehensive readiness, deliberate talent management Lt. Gen. Richard Scobee passes the guidon to Col. Kelli Smiley, the new Lt. Gen. Richard Scobee and Chief Master Sgt. Timothy White meet with manage a section, others helm a num- Healy’s robust Air Reserve Personnel Center commander. Smiley is one of several new and enhancing organizational trust – to align with our strategic Reservists from the 624th Regional Support Group, Hickam Air Force bered Air Force, but all are leaders. We mobility back- senior leaders throughout the command. (Staff Sgt. Katrina M. Brisbin) priorities. Today, I want to focus on LOE3, enhancing organiza- Base, Hawaii. rely on each and every one to conduct ground and his tional trust. our day-to-day operations and provide time at the com- the challenges our Reservists face and During my most recent trip to Indo-Pacific Command, a opportunity to enhance trust in the organization, which directly outstanding support to our Airmen and batant commands make him well suited improve their quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • 1) ATQ Summer 2004
    CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments......................................................................... 2 President’s Message ............................................................................... 3 AIRLIFT TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 12 • Number 3 • Summer 2004 Secretary’s Notes ................................................................................... 3 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, Col. Barry F. Creighton, USAF (Ret.), Secretary, Association Round-Up .......................................................................... 4 1708 Cavelletti Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23454. (757) 838-3037. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $30.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. Cover Story The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the AMC: 12 Years of Excellence ......................................................... 6-17 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $30 annually A New Era in American Air Power Began on 1 June 1992 or $85 for three years. Full-time student membership is $10 per year. Life membership is $400. Corporate membership includes five individual memberships and is $1200 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Departments Airlift/Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published for the use of the officers,
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Time Maintainers Command Makes Strides Hiring Air Reserve Technicians
    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 6 December 2019 Full-time Maintainers Command makes strides hiring Air Reserve Technicians Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC STRENGTHENING YOUR THE COMMAND TEAM, SUPPORTING CHIEF'S NEW YEAR'S YOUR FAMILY CHALLENGE Heroes of the Air Force Reserve, Lt. Gen. Richard Season’s greetings Citizen Airmen! First off, the boss and Scobee high fives Being part of an outstanding team is I want to say thank you. Thank you for all you have done deployed members of an amazing feeling. I am honored to be a his Air Force Reserve throughout the year, and thank you for what you will continue part of this incredible Air Force Reserve family. ( Tech. Sgt. to do in the coming year. team. You, our Airmen, are highly skilled Robert Cloys) Your steadfast service, commitment and sacrifice are com- individuals, and your abilities are magni- mendable, and we couldn’t be more proud of you. fied when you work as a team. A strong The cohesion and effectiveness of command chief and I would like to be We had a couple of rough patches this past year; and without team can accomplish nearly anything. the operations-maintenance team was at every unit’s drill weekend this month a doubt, we will face challenges in the new year. Regardless the I’ve witnessed the achievements of visible to the entire wing. It was clear to personally thank you for all your hard challenge, like always, we will persevere because of Airmen like many great teams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Begins Now!
    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 72 No. 1 February 2020 Reserve stands ready to support newest service branch Preparing for the future fight while maintaining the Reserve identity THE FUTURE BEGINS NOW! Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC take a knee March 1 through the remainder of the fiscal year so DIVERSITY MAKES US STRONGER A SNAPSHOT OF we can overhaul and update course content. We aim to ensure facilitators and content are delivering the The Air Force Reserve is one of the CHANGES ON THE most current relevant leadership curricula. Once up and running, greatest military organizations in the I'm confident the feedback will mirror that received about the world. Our diversity is one of many Chief Orientation Course revamp. factors which contribute to our greatness. HORIZON I've also held a series of conversations with my good friends, We are an incredibly diverse command, Chief Master Sgt. Ron Anderson, command chief of the Air in terms of our missions and people. With the recent release of the Air Force Reserve Command National Guard, and Chief Master Sgt. Julie Gudgel, command This diversity strengthens our organiza- E8/E9 Command Key Personnel List and the AFRC Chief chief of Air Education and Training Command, about increased tion and enhances our ability to provide Screening Board results, this is a perfect time to expand on my professional military education flexibility. We haven't worked combat power. second line of effort I discussed in a previous Citizen Airman out all the kinks, but I am excited about the increased flexibility The word diversity is most commonly commentary: Deliberate talent management.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No
    MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Commands and Air National Guard
    2019 USAF ALMANAC MAJOR COMMANDS AND AIR NATIONAL GUARD Pilots from the 388th Fighter Wing’s, 4th Fighter Squadron prepare to lead Red Flag 19-1, the Air Force’s premier combat exercise, at Nellis AFB, Nev. Photo: R. Nial Bradshaw/USAF R.Photo: Nial The Air Force has 10 major commands and two Air Reserve Components. (Air Force Reserve Command is both a majcom and an ARC.) ACRONYMS AA active associate: CFACC combined force air evasion, resistance, and NOSS network operations security ANG/AFRC owned aircraft component commander escape specialists) squadron AATTC Advanced Airlift Tactics CRF centralized repair facility GEODSS Ground-based Electro- PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Training Center CRG contingency response group Optical Deep Space Radar Attack AEHF Advanced Extremely High CRTC Combat Readiness Training Surveillance system Characterization System Frequency Center GPS Global Positioning System RAOC regional Air Operations Center AFS Air Force Station CSO combat systems officer GSSAP Geosynchronous Space ROTC Reserve Officer Training Corps ALCF airlift control flight CW combat weather Situational Awareness SBIRS Space Based Infrared System AOC/G/S air and space operations DCGS Distributed Common Program SCMS supply chain management center/group/squadron Ground Station ISR intelligence, surveillance, squadron ARB Air Reserve Base DMSP Defense Meteorological and reconnaissance SBSS Space Based Surveillance ATCS air traffic control squadron Satellite Program JB Joint Base System BM battle management DSCS Defense Satellite JBSA Joint Base
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps
    OOffffiiccee ooff tthhee SSeeccrreettaarryy ooff DDeeffeennssee OOppeerraattiioonn aanndd MMaaiinntteennaannccee OOvveerrvviieeww FFeebbrruuaarryy 22000077 FFiissccaall YYeeaarr ((FFYY)) 22000088 BBuuddggeett EEssttiimmaatteess TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Page Service by Appropriation......................................................1 MAJOR ACTIVITIES Page O&M Title Summary ............................................................3 Air Operations.......................................................................65 APPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS Base Operations Support .....................................................84 Command, Control, Communications (C3)........................90 Army........................................................................................6 Depot Maintenance ...............................................................95 Navy........................................................................................16 Environmental Programs....................................................101 Marine Corps ........................................................................26 Facilities Sustainment, Repair & Modernization and Air Force................................................................................30 Demolition Programs …………………………………109 Defense-Wide.........................................................................35 Land Forces ..........................................................................112 Reserve Forces.......................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • AFRC Considerations \D +G*
    INDEX TAB TITLE PIT Military value BRAC Impact concerns Economic Impact 1995 BRAC Commission Recommendations Aircraft Parking Plans Memorandum of Agreement Show Stoppers Military Entry Processing Station (MEPS) Firing Range National Medical Disaster System (NMDS) Commuting Distance DOD Estimated Payback Figures Regional Joint Readiness Center A Joint Readiness Study The Dupuy Institute Contact Information alue Recognize DoD use of selection criteria - Focus of 91 lthand potential impact on entire military value of Pittsburgh region to include 99thRegional Readiness Command Charles E. Kelly Support Facility Implications on joint aspect of national defense and homeland security MILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA * PIT* BRAC TASK FORCE Concerns The BRAC Task Force has grave concerns about the nation maintaining an effective strategic reserve that are trained and ready to defend the nation. Proposed changes will: - Impact retention and future recruiting of Reserve Forces - Result in a loss of expert skills and experience that DoD and USAF need to fight the global war on terrorism MILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA * PIT. BRAC TASK FORCE Date: June 18, 2005 To: Bob Cook, Deputy Director Mike Flinn, Senior Analyst, Air Force Timothy B. McGregor, Senior Air Force Analyst From: Charles L. Holsworth, Western Pennsylvania BRAC Task Force Director RE: Point Paper, Specific BRAC Impact Concerns- Air Force I have attached the POINT PAPER you requested during our discussion on June 9, 2005 there at the BRAC offices. I hope
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 (NGRER FY 2018) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2017 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $896,000 in Fiscal Years 2016–2017. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $684,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017Feb15 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges (Operational & Strategic Reserve Forces) 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-7 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-8 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-11 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Army Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-3 F. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 G. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-6 A.
    [Show full text]