DOCSLIB.ORG

Sloviansk Donetsk Special Subnational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sloviansk Donetsk Special Subnational Sloviansk Donetsk Special Subnational Cluster Meeting 12th January 2018 2017 Year in Review Agenda: 1) Action Points and Announcements 2) 5W Updates for December 3) Guidelines Produced in 2017 4) Guidelines in the Pipeline 5) Monitoring and Reporting 6) Damage Database 7) Partner Updates 8) AOB Present: Ministry of TOT and IDPs Donetsk oblast, UNHCR, DRC, PIN, ADRA Ukraine, OHCHR, NRC, Save the Children ICRC, REACH, ACTED, Ache Nova, Luxembourg Red Cross Action Points and Announcements The Subnational Shelter Cluster coordinator greeted all the participants of the meeting and the roundtable introduction took place. The Subnational Cluster Coordinator announced that this would be the final meeting she would chair as Subnational Cluster Coordinator. She announced that there would also be changes in the national coordination team, as Igor Chantefort, Senior National Cluster Coordinator would take up new responsibilities with UNHCR to facilitate the development of projects related with affordable housing. In his place, Andrea Parisi, Shelter Officer for UNHCR would take up dual responsibilities as Cluster Coordinator. At Subnational level, the position was being nationalized with Olesia Kaida assuming responsibilities as of earlier in that week. Kostyantyn Dmitrenko would remain in place as Information management focal point for the cluster. Further updates based on last months reporting included: What Update New Year Update to include advocacy Done: New Year Update published points about fuel challenges in GCA https://www.sheltercluster.org/ukraine/documents/winteriz ation-2017-18-new-year-update Addresses to be updated for end of Book of Addresses to be sent on Friday Jan 19 or at least December Monday Jan 22: Precision post meeting: Book of addresses circulated by Subnational Coordinator as of 19th of January. Conduct details of new Cluster team Andrea Parisi: [email protected] Olesia Kaida: [email protected] Kostyantyn Dmitrenko: [email protected] Action Points Who Sasha Varashkov to share Ministry of Social Policy Sasha, Olesia/Kostya, Act of Destruction unification attempt with Cluster and HLP Coordinator Place the damage assessment and technical note Cluster Team (Kostya) on an easier to access part of the Website Agencies to make use of the minimum PDM Partners indicators available in the guidelines and to share findings with cluster to inform future guidelines Light Revision of Guidelines and winterization Andrea/Olesia (April through lessons learned summer) REACH to share assessment tool and information Jeremy and REACH team on the assessment with partners Advocacy with development initiatives Shelter Cluster team and agencies in advance of the winter season. 5W Updates for December The Subnational Shelter Cluster coordinator reminded the partner agencies about the reporting to the Cluster: 5W inputs were due on the 12th of January Precision post meeting: Final results of 2017 outputs and achievements are now summarized in a four-pager annual report: https://www.sheltercluster.org/ukraine/documents/shelter- cluster-annual-report-2017 Guidelines Produced in 2017 The Subnational Shelter Cluster coordinator reviewed the products published by the Shelter Cluster during 2017 in order to discuss what could be improved when looking forward to 2018: Technical Notes The agencies had a long discussion about how to legally account for damages at the field level. IDP Ombudsman for Donetsk Oblast, representative of the Ministry of Social Policy, and Consultant for the Council of Europe mentioned that the Ministry of Social Policy was now trying to again standardize the ways that acts of destruction are reported at field level. Subnational Coordinator reviewed the attempts by the Danish Refugee Council this year to introduce a standard act of destruction, though at the same time lessons learned from September 2017 were showing the need to bring in the engineering perspective, as the judges were looking at a way to quantify damages and to distinguish damages from the pre-conflict lack of maintenance for this house. There were several good ideas mentioned about what advocacy would be required to bring about compensation. Several agencies remarked at the slow pace of compensation for the local population. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator reminded agencies that compensation is quite a slow process and would not be brought about as quickly as humanitarian interventions. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator reminded agencies about the work of the Housing, Land, and Property Technical Working Group in this regard. In May 2017, a document was published looking at foreign case studies: https://www.sheltercluster.org/housing-land-and-property-working- group/documents/foreign-experience-housing-solutions-and . This study conducted by the Working Group members showed that first of all compensation would require some sort of claim of self- responsibility for the damages caused. Further, it was necessary to determine who was eligible for criteria. While humanitarian interventions are focused on the most vulnerable, all types of people regardless of status, wealth, or physical stature are eligible to make claims of compensation. At the current stage, the Ukrainian government had not articulated any clarity on these matters. The damage form and assessments that were discussed by humanitarian agencies are those used to determine the minimum indicators that are required. Several agencies discussed the challenges related with the new shelling in Novoluhanske. One agency remarked that the frenzy surrounding this case was worse than the flare up in Avdiivka at the beginning of 2017. Several agencies said that more training on filling out the Kobo form was required. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator cited several examples from 2017 where agencies either used Kobo or the blank excel form of the damage database to document the situation in terms of shelter needs to better inform decision- making of the cluster, so it was not a requirement to use Kobo simply but to also use the indicators in the damage form. It was recommended to place this damage form somewhere more visible on the Cluster website. OHCHR mentioned that they had done a brief report on the situation in Novoluhanske. They questioned the agencies whether they planned to follow up with any more durable forms of repairs. Agencies replied that the quick mobilisation of UNHCR and their partners with acute emergency shelter was the required response. Stakeholders from the government mentioned that this town also had significant resources for an eventual response including the presence of the State Emergency Service Brigades. Further security was not guaranteed at the moment for more durable repairs as the likelihood of repeated shelling was still possible. Monetization and Winterization Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator mentioned the two main guidelines documents that had been published in 2017. Both also provided additional insights into mainstreaming of Post Distribution Monitoring indicators for both shelter and winterization programming. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator highlighted the importance of using these indicators, as she had noticed that agencies were better able to learn from their programming about the outstanding needs. The Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator had been able to hear feedback from local authorities and several agencies about outstanding shelter and access to documentation needs post repair projects. Partners raised concerns about the fact that we had been able to advocate for extra funding and support for the winterization needs this past winter, but what about the next winter? The difficulties in the market for both wood and coal markets in GCA were rising. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator pointed that in doing the analysis of the Humanitarian Response Plan for 2017, the needs in the area of winterization were increasing. The Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator shared the analysis of the Cluster’s findings. While the needs to shelter needs were being gradually met despite daily shelling, the protracted conflict was continuing to reduce dramatically access to essential resources for the winter period. Buildings Damaged (Unique address) GCA Needs of Heating (Access to solid GCA as of October fuel has decreased due to the conflict) 17350 20000 20000 14413 11520 15000 10438 10000 6258 6464 10000 18800 18000 15651 11000 13854 5000 7431 0 0 2015 2016 2017 2014-2015 2016 2017 Number of HHs assisted GCA Durable Repair Cumulative Damages reported Number of households in need of heating GCA Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator mentioned that it would likely be required to do a light revision of the Winterization Guidelines in the summer especially as agencies were already reporting the continuing rising prices of coal and wood since the beginning of the winter season. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator invited REACH Country Representative to say a few words: REACH Initiative had been requested by the Humanitarian Country Team to conduct an assessment during the winter season to check on the coping mechanisms of the affected population during the coldest months of the year. The data collection would soon start after validation of the tool, but the publication of the report may take a little bit longer and come out in June. Subnational Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordinator remarked that that would be good timing to facilitate next year’s winterization planning. It was also informed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War in Religious Dimension
    War in religious dimension Attacks on religion in Crimea and Donbas region Report submitted under Article 15 for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Kyiv 2019 1 Table of content The Authors..........................................................................................................................................3 Truth Hounds...............................................................................................................................3 International Renaissance Foundation.......................................................................................3 Executive summary...............................................................................................................................3 Legal assessment..................................................................................................................................5 Methodology........................................................................................................................................7 Collecting data.............................................................................................................................7 Analyzing data.............................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................................9 Prewar context............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • IREX Methodology for Citizen Engagement with the Reform Process
    IREX MEthodology foR CItIzEn EngagEMEnt wIth thE REfoRM PRoCEss developed for the Ministry of Internal affairs of Ukraine - national Police Reform the project is funded by the U.s. department of state’s Bureau of International narcotics and law Enforcement (Inl) and implemented in partnership with the International development law organization (Idlo) and in close cooperation with the Ministry of Internal affairs of Ukraine. PURPosE of MEthodology: Provide step by step guidance on how to build partnership relationships between citizens and the reformed government/public service by changing attitudes and behaviors through provision of relevant information and demonstration of the value of cooperation. logICal fRaMEwoRK: In each community, government representatives, citizens (broadly defined and inclusive of civil society, entrepreneurs, activists), and media are all stakeholders and participants in the reform process. For reform success and effectiveness, they need to be engaged in a participatory and meaningful way that would allow to overcome stereotypes and prejudices and to build trust and productive relationship. This can be achieved through conversations around issues of mutual concern facilitated at neutral platforms which provide timely and relevant information about reforms and help establish effective and useful interaction patterns between stakeholders. Trust-building and objective useful information will lead to attitude change. This, reinforced by interactions around issues of mutual concern will facilitate positive behavior change resulting in new relationship and dynamics and successful reform effort. IREX, within the Citizen Engagement and Reform Communication project, engages libraries and other civic platforms to establish cooperation between citizens, mass media, and patrol police. the project works in all regions of Ukraine with particular focus on the cities of Kramatorsk, sloviansk, Mariupol, severodonetsk, Rubizhne, lysychansk, Kropivnytskiy, vinnitsa, Chernihiv, Ivano-frankivsk, Uzhgorod, and Mukachevo.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in Ukraine
    COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SITUATION IN UKRAINE: WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN PRISONS SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY ANTI-GOVERNMENT FORCES September 2020 TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ATO Anti-Terrorist Operation CF Correctional Facility DPR Donetsk Peoples’ Republic ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FIDH International Federation for Human Rights IAC International Armed Conflict ICC International Criminal Court ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia KHPG Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group LPR Luhansk Peoples’ Republic NIAC Non-International Armed Conflict PTDC Pre Trial Detention Centre SBU Ukrainian State Security UAF Ukrainian Armed Forces The preparation and elaboration of this FIDH-KHPG Communication were made possible thanks to the support of the United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine, International Renaissance Foundation, the European Commission, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy (United States), the Democracy Commission of the United States Embassy in Ukraine, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and KHPG and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the aforementioned supporting institutions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of abbreviations 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Executive Summary 6 III. Filing Parties 9 IV. Methodology 12 V. Factual Background 17 A. Outbreak of Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine 17 B. Ukrainian Prisons in Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces Prior 24 to the Outbreak of Armed Conflict C. Impact of the Outbreak of Armed Conflict on Prisoners in 24 Eastern Ukraine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine
    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Overview: Area Based Assessment in Government Controlled Areas Within 5Km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, July 2017
    Situation Overview: Area Based Assessment in Government Controlled Areas within 5km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, July 2017 Key Findings restrictions on goods significantly reduce Map 1: Assessed Settlements connectivity between large urban centres In order to support humanitarian planning, NGCA and GCA periphery settlements. KHARKIVSKA REACH, between May and June 2017, Adjusting to restrictions, GCA cities and LUHANSKA ² conducted an assessment of access to basic settlements formed new basic service units LUHANSK GCA services and markets in 100 settlements in (BSUs) along the LoC (Map 3). The separation DONETSKA ZAPORIZKA RUSSIAN Government Controlled Areas (GCA) within of large NGCA urban centres from surrounding FEDERATION 5km of the line of contact (LoC). GCA settlements creates significant service EAST LUHANSK The assessed area, a 5km-wide buffer along access and delivery challenges within the assessed area, due to security concerns, SIEVIERODONETSK the 500km LoC, represents an area of nearly SLOVIANSK 2,000 square kilometres. Within the area, lack of transport and departure of qualified POPASNA personnel. KRAMATORSK the estimated population is between 150,000 BAKHMUT 1 STANYTSIA and 200,000 , including registered internally Protection BAKHMUT DONETSK GCA POPASNA LUHANSKA displaced persons (IDPs) and returnees. The Local populations experience regular shelling, LUHANSK population is older than the national average KOSTIANTYNIVKA exposure to mines and other risks related to TORETSK as many youths and younger families have ALCHEVSK explosive remnants of war (ERW). These TORETSK fled the area. concerns were particularly reported in South AVDIIVKA HORLIVKA Throughout the 27 cities and 73 villages in the Donetsk, West Donetsk, Avdiivka and East 2 LUHANSK NGCA area, there is regular military activity , which Luhansk.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyiv, Kramatorsk, Sloviansk, Sievierodonetsk, Mariupol 27 May 2021
    Cash Working Group Meeting, Skype – Kyiv, Kramatorsk, Sloviansk, Sievierodonetsk, Mariupol 27 May 2021 Discussion Action points/Decisions ACTED provided the briefing/refresher on the tasks and modality of the Cash Working Group (CWG). Since 2018, ACTED voluntarily co-chairs the CWG facilitating coordination. Also, the relevance of the Multi-Purpose Cash (MPC) transfer amount is regularly discussed and reviewed at the CWG meetings, and the findings of the regular rounds of the Joint Market Monitoring are presented. 1. Results on MPC activities in 2021 Q1 (by UNOCHA) ACTED to re-share the link to • 8 partners were operational in terms of MPC in Q1 2021 – ACTED, Caritas Ukraine, German Red Cross, IOM, People in Need, Polish the CWG Web-page on Humanitarian Action, DRC/DDG, and PIN. humanitarianresponse.info and • Based on the information provided by partners, the total amount of MPC provided in total 2020 Q1 was 28,904,000 UAH. presentation with Q1 2021 achievements to the partners • 4,322 beneficiaries received assistance under the projects included in HRP and 1,461 outside of HRP, UAH 15,996,500 and UAH 12,907,500, respectively. The request for the participants had been shared for the cross-checking of the figures. • All information will be available in the form of interactive dashboards on the HR.info web platform with detailed information as per Cluster, partner, delivery mechanism, and modality after receiving confirmations from partners. 2. Partner updates on the MPC and other sectoral cash assistance programs • Caritas informed on the plans to start a new project for MPC and cash for health in August 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine
    Annual Project Results Report Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine Project Number: Reporting Period: P006554 27 March 2019 – 31 March 2020 Country / Region: Date of Report: Ukraine / Europe 31 March 2020 Name of Implementer: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Implementer’s name and contact Information: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Victor Munteanu Programme Manager United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 1 Aeroklubna Street, Kramatorsk, 84300, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Total Project Budget: CDN $5,000,000 Project start and end date: 27 March, 2019 – 30 June, 2022 1 3 Outcomes Achieved1 4 Progress towards the Ultimate Outcome 1000 Improved stability, enjoyment of human rights, and gender equality, of conflict- affected population, especially women and vulnerable or marginalized groups, of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts Prior to the establishment of a network of mobile administrative service centres (ASCs) in the conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the programme carried out a comprehensive assessment and analysis to identify 10 target communities - five from Donetsk and five from Luhansk oblasts. The communities were carefully selected in line with the project’s objectives and applications received from local authorities. Preference was given to the communities in close proximity to the “contact line” and to exit and entry checkpoints (EECPs), as well as large districts with a significant proportion of rural residents. Last but not least, the interest of communities in working and closely cooperating with the programme was assessed so as to ensure the sustainability of subsequent results. As a result, the following communities were selected to participate in the “Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine” Project: Kurakhove, Mariinka, Mariupol, Siversk and Vuhledar in Donetsk Oblast, and Novoaidar, Popasna, Shchastia, Sievierodonetsk and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhansk Oblast (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • External Vacancy Announcement
    The Operation of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Ukraine invites qualified candidates to apply for the following vacancy: Functional Title & Grade: Administrative Clerk (Janitor)/LICA 1 Date of Issue: 25/09/2019 (part-time, 7 hrs/day) Contractual Status: UNOPS contract initially for 1 year, with Deadline for applications: 08/10/2019 possibility of extension beyond that date upon satisfactory performance. Duty Station: Sloviansk, Ukraine EXTERNAL VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT OPERATIONAL CONTEXT To ensure the better effectiveness of the humanitarian operation in Eastern Ukraine it was decided to relocate UNHCR Sub Office to Sloviansk. The focus of the Sub Office is to provide timely and effective Shelter and Protection assistance to IDPs in Eastern Ukraine area. The Office is located at 57 Kozatska Street, occupying two floors building in Sloviansk. The number of staff working in the office is around 25 people. The UNHCR Sub office in Sloviansk has a need in one unskilled worker engaged for daily presence in the office to perform tasks on minor office maintenance and general oversight of smooth running of the office. Under the supervision of the Administrative/Finance Associate, Administrative Clerk (Janitor) will perform tasks as stated below. Administrative Clerk (Janitor) shall work in the office on daily basis, according to the following schedule: 7 hours per day from 09:00 to 17:00. FUNCTIONAL STATEMENT Accountability (key results that will be achieved) - The incumbent will be required to present a monthly report of activities to show progress on the objectives set with the Supervisor. - The performance indicators to be defined by the Supervisor based on the objectives related to smooth running of the office.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Good Morning Commission Staff. My Name Is Craig Lewis and I Am a Partner with Hogan Lovells
    BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. CARBON AND CERTAIN ALLOY STEEL WIRE ROD FROM BELARUS, ITALY, KOREA, RUSSIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SPAIN, TURKEY, UKRAINE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, AND UNITED KINGDOM INV. NOS. 701-TA-573-574 AND 731-TA-1349-1358 (PRELIMINARY) TESTIMONY OF CRAIG A. LEWIS, ESQ. HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY YENAKIIEVE IRON & STEEL WORKS 1. Good morning Commission staff. My name is Craig Lewis and I am a partner with Hogan Lovells. I am appearing today on behalf of Ukrainian producers Yenakiieve Steel and its Makiivka steel works. I regret that Metinvest was unable to provide a company witness from Ukraine on such short notice. 2. Until very recently, Yenakiieve was a fully integrated Ukrainian steel company operating within the Metinvest Group. Yenakiieve Steel produced a wide range of metal products including billets, angles, channels, beams, wire rod, and rebar. 3. I refer you to the map we have provided. The Yenakiieve and Makiivka steel works are located in the Donetsk region of Eastern Ukraine. Since 2014, the Donbas region of Ukraine, including the cities of Yenakiieve and Makiivka, has become a war zone, as separatist groups, backed by Russia, seized the region through military action. Political and security control of the region has been taken away from the Ukrainian Government and seized by the separatists. 4. The resulting conflict has claimed the lives of many thousands of innocent civilians and Ukrainian soldiers. It has also had a profound negative impact on manufacturing industries in the region. Critical infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, including 1 separatist also began a systematic inventory of the plants, their equipment, and stores.
    [Show full text]