DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA Technical Memorandum 0000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA Technical Memorandum 0000 NASA/TM–2018-219833 Short-Haul Revitalization Study Final Report Ty V. Marien, Kevin R. Antcliff, Mark D. Guynn, and Douglas P. Wells Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia Steven J. Schneider and Michael Tong NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Antonio A. Trani and Nicolas K. Hinze Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia Samuel M. Dollyhigh Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc., Hampton, Virginia May 2018 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. advancement of aeronautics and space science. The Collected papers from scientific and technical NASA scientific and technical information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the auspices SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, technical, or historical information from NASA organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates programs, projects, and missions, often NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access concerned with subjects having substantial to the NTRS Registered and its public interface, the public interest. NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest collections of aeronautical and space TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. science STI in the world. Results are published in both English-language translations of foreign non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI scientific and technical material pertinent to Report Series, which includes the following report NASA’s mission. types: Specialized services also include organizing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of and publishing research results, distributing completed research or a major significant phase of specialized research announcements and feeds, research that present the results of NASA providing information desk and personal search Programs and include extensive data or theoretical support, and enabling data exchange services. analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and information For more information about the NASA STI program, deemed to be of continuing reference value. see the following: NASA counter-part of peer-reviewed formal professional papers but has less stringent Access the NASA STI program home page at limitations on manuscript length and extent of http://www.sti.nasa.gov graphic presentations. E-mail your question to [email protected] TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific and technical findings that are Phone the NASA STI Information Desk at preliminary or of specialized interest, 757-864-9658 e.g., quick release reports, working papers, and bibliographies that contain minimal Write to: annotation. Does not contain extensive analysis. NASA STI Information Desk Mail Stop 148 CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and NASA Langley Research Center technical findings by NASA-sponsored Hampton, VA 23681-2199 contractors and grantees. NASA/TM–2018-219833 Short-Haul Revitalization Study Final Report Ty V. Marien, Kevin R. Antcliff, Mark D. Guynn, and Douglas P. Wells Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia Steven J. Schneider and Michael Tong NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Antonio A. Trani and Nicolas K. Hinze Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia Samuel M. Dollyhigh Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc., Hampton, Virginia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 23681-2199 May 2018 Acknowledgements Thanks to members of the Short-Haul team and all others who contributed: William Fredericks, Andrea Storch, Jason Welstead, Nick Borer (NASA Langley Research Center), William Haller and John Reynolds (NASA Glenn Research Center). This study was supported by NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology project. The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers in the report is for accurate reporting and does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available from: NASA STI Program / Mail Stop 148 NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681-2199 Fax: 757-864-6500 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents......................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................................vi 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 3. Short-Haul Aircraft Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Short-Haul Range Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 3 3.2. Runway Length Characteristics for Short-Haul Transport Aircraft ............................................................. 4 3.3. Fuel Efficiency of Short-Haul Transport Aircraft ........................................................................................ 6 3.4. Short-Haul Aircraft Inventory and Evolution .............................................................................................. 7 3.4.1. Turboprop Transports .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.4.2. Turboprop-Only Markets ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.4.3. Regional Jet Transports ......................................................................................................................... 14 4. Short-Haul Aircraft Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Requirements Development ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1. Aircraft Seat Capacity Analysis ............................................................................................................. 19 4.1.2. Cruise Speed and Maximum Range Sensitivities .................................................................................. 25 4.1.3. Short-Haul Aircraft Technical Requirements ........................................................................................ 27 5. Short-Haul Aircraft Design .................................................................................................................................. 28 5.1. Technology Selection ................................................................................................................................. 28 5.2. Hybrid-Electric Architecture ...................................................................................................................... 28 5.3. Mission and Sizing Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 28 5.4. Engine Model Development....................................................................................................................... 29 5.5. Aircraft Model Development ..................................................................................................................... 33 5.5.1. Baseline Technology Model .................................................................................................................. 33 5.5.2. Advanced Technology Model ................................................................................................................ 34 5.6. Multi-Disciplinary Optimization Framework............................................................................................. 34 5.6.1. Hybrid-Electric Aircraft Sizing Procedure ............................................................................................ 34 5.7. Sizing Results ............................................................................................................................................. 38 5.7.1. Energy Specific Air Range of the Hybrid-Electric Concept .................................................................. 40 5.7.2. Additional Sensitivities .......................................................................................................................... 41 5.8. Sizing Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 42 6. Short-Haul Aircraft Cost Analysis ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Aircraft Accident at Bodø Airport on 4 December 2003 Involving Dornier Do 228-202 Ln-Hta, Operated by Kato Airline As
    SL Report 2007/23 REPORT ON THE AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT AT BODØ AIRPORT ON 4 DECEMBER 2003 INVOLVING DORNIER DO 228-202 LN-HTA, OPERATED BY KATO AIRLINE AS This report has been translated into English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. As accurate as the translation might be, the original Norwegian text takes precedence as the report of reference. June 2007 Accident Investigation Board Norway P.O. Box 213 N-2001 Lillestrøm Norway Phone:+ 47 63 89 63 00 Fax:+ 47 63 89 63 01 http://www.aibn.no E-mail: [email protected] The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving flight safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger flight safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board’s task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for flight safety should be avoided. Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 INDEX NOTIFICATION .................................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................3 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION..............................................................................................4 1.1 History of the flight..............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Aviation Report
    Quarterly Aviation Report DUTCH SAFETY BOARD page 14 Investigations Within the Aviation sector, the Dutch Safety Board is required by law to investigate occurrences involving aircraft on or above Dutch territory. In addition, the Board has a statutory duty to investigate occurrences involving Dutch aircraft over open sea. Its October - December 2020 investigations are conducted in accordance with the Safety Board Kingdom Act and Regulation (EU) In this quarterly report, the Dutch Safety Board gives a brief review of the no. 996/2010 of the European past year. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of commercial Parliament and of the Council of flights in the Netherlands was 52% lower than in 2019. The Dutch Safety 20 October 2010 on the Board therefore received fewer reports. In 2020, 27 investigations were investigation and prevention of started into serious incidents and accidents in the Netherlands. In addition, accidents and incidents in civil the Dutch Safety Board opened an investigation into a serious incident aviation. If a description of the involving a Boeing 747 in Zimbabwe in 2019. The Civil Aviation Authority page 7 events is sufficient to learn of Zimbabwe has delegated the entire conduct of the investigation to the lessons, the Board does not Netherlands, where the aircraft is registered and the airline is located. In the conduct any further investigation. past year, the Dutch Safety Board has offered and/or provided assistance to foreign investigative bodies thirteen times in investigations involving Dutch The Board’s activities are mainly involvement. aimed at preventing occurrences in the future or limiting their In this quarterly report you can read, among other things, about an consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 Jahre Forschungsstandort Oberpfaffenhofen 3 Vialight Communications Gmbh 41
    INHALT VORWORT VORWORT INFORMATIONS- & TELEKOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNOLOGIE 75 JAHRE FORSCHUNGSSTANDORT Martin Zeil, Bayerischer Staatsminister für Wirtschaft, Infrastruktur, Concat AG 12 Verkehr und Technologie Eureka Navigation Solutions AG 38 OBERPFAFFENHOFEN 75 Jahre Forschungsstandort Oberpfaffenhofen 3 ViaLight Communications GmbH 41 GRUSSWORT LUFT- & RAUMFAHRT Der Forschungsstandort Oberpfaffenhofen dass es uns gelang, eines der beiden Galileo 20 neue Unternehmen zu gründen, von denen Karl Roth, Landrat des Landkreises Starnberg 4 328 Support Services GmbH / 328 Design GmbH 8 feiert dieses Jahr sein 75-jähriges Bestehen. Kontrollzentren nach Oberpfaffenhofen zu der größte Teil auch später dem Standort treu Anwendungszentrum GmbH Oberpfaffenhofen 9 Dazu meinen herzlichen Glückwunsch. holen. bleibt. HISTORIE bavAIRia e. V. 11 In der Anfangszeit hätte es wohl niemand für Neben dem DLR wird der Standort Ober- Der Freistaat Bayern misst der Luft- und Forschungsstandort Oberpfaffenhofen – ein Rückblick 5 Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ 14 möglich gehalten, dass das kleine Oberpfaffen- pfaffenhofen maßgeblich durch erfolgreiche Raumfahrt eine hohe Bedeutung bei. Bayern- BRANCHENVIELFALT Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) 15 hofen, in einer ländlichen Umgebung weit Unternehmen, die von der Luftfahrt bis hin weit sind in diesem Industriezweig rund 36.000 außerhalb der Stadt München, einen derartigen zur Automotive Branche reichen, geprägt. Die Mitarbeiter beschäftigt und erwirtschaften einen Die Mischung macht’s 7 DLR GfR mbH 20 EDMO-Flugbetrieb GmbH 22 Bekanntheitsgrad erlangen wird. Heute ist der Palette umfasst neben international agieren- jährlichen Umsatz von rund 6,9 Mrd. Euro. Standort ein Synonym für internationale Spitzen- den Konzernen innovative mittelständische Um der Bedeutung der Luft- und Raumfahrt GCT Gruppe 24 AUS- & WEITERBILDUNG leistungen in der Luft- und Raumfahrt.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specification for Hal-Dornier-228-202 Aircraft System
    ANNEXURE - 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR HAL-DORNIER-228-202 AIRCRAFT SYSTEM HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT DIVISION POST CHAKERI KANPUR INDIA This document is the property of HAL and should Be treated in strict confidence for the intended purpose. The information contained in this document should not be divulged to any third party. CONTENTS CHAPTERS DESCRIPTION 1 HAL-DO-228 Aircraft: General Description……………………………….3 2 Standard HAL-DO-228 Aircraft: Equipment Fit…………………………10 3 Aircraft Performance………………………………………………………………20 4 Aircraft Cabin and Seat Rail details.............................................22 5 Aircraft Antenna Layout...............................................................25 Page 2 of 25 CHAPTER-1 1 HAL-DO-228 AIRCRAFT: GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 The HAL-DO-228 aircraft is a high wing monoplane with a cantilevered wing and two turboprop engines in wing-mounted pod designed for multipurpose utility and commuter services. Characteristics like low fuel consumption, short take off and landing capabilities, operation from semi prepared runways, comfortable air- conditioned cabin and long range make this aircraft ideally suitated for such applications. The leading particulars of the aircraft are: Type HAL-DO-228 AIRCRAFT No. of Crew 2 Maximum Take-off Weight 6400 Kg Maximum Landing Weight 5900 Kg Power Plant 2 Garrett TPE 331-5-252D Turboprops Propellers 2 four bladed reversible pitch Hartzell propellers – HC-B4TN-5ML/LT10574FS Overall Length 16.56 M (54 ft, 4 in) Wing Span 16.97 M (55 ft, 8 in) Maximum Height 4.86 M (15 ft, 11 in) Landing Gears Hydraulically actuated fully retractable Electrical systems 28V, 300 amps DC Page 3 of 25 1.2 Design philosophy 1.2.1 The aircraft is designed to meet normal category requirement of FAA/FAR23.
    [Show full text]
  • Shownews Farnsborough Day 4
    D A Y 4 AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY / AIR TRANSPORT WORLD / SPEEDNEWS July 14, 2016 Farnborough Airshow Engine War Intensifies P&W’s geared turbofan and CFM LEAP battle to power A320s.PAGE 3 Qatar Cools on A350s Al Baker considers 777-300ERs to fill gap in delivery schedule. PAGE 3 Apache Fires Brimstone MBDA completes live firing trials of the direct-fire missile. PAGE 4 Norsk Titanium Wins Deals Additive manufacturing company to supply major OEMs. PAGE 6 Airbus Halves A380 Production ISTAR Chief Speaks Out Airbus is making a large cut to its A380 output, innovating and investing in the A380,” he RAF’s intelligence head criticizes as the manufacturer continues to struggle with added. In an effort to defer concerns that reduction of Sentinel fleet. PAGE 8 securing additional sales for its largest aircraft. Airbus may abandon the A380, Bregier said, The company said on Tuesday that in 2018 “The A380 is here to stay.” Personal Health for Engines it will reduce production of the aircraft from Airbus currently has orders for 319 A380s. It GE Aviation applies data analyt- the current 2.5 per month to one. has delivered a total of 193, 27 of which were ics on an industrial scale. PAGE 10 “With this prudent, proactive step we delivered in 2015. This year it has handed over are establishing a new target for our indus- 14 aircraft, as of mid-July. trial planning, meeting current commercial The decision to reduce production further Airship, C-130J: Cargo Duo demand, but keeping all our options open will result in a huge challenge to keep the pro- Lockheed markets civil C-130 and to benefit from future A380 markets,” CEO gram profitable on a recurring cost basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Sluggish Economy Stalls New Turboprops G-21 Super Goose by Mark Huber
    new (AND BORN-AGAIN) R E B R turboprops U H T T T Comp Air CA-12 A M Sluggish economy stalls new turboprops G-21 Super Goose by Mark Huber he sluggish economy has stalled investment into new turboprop development, but updates of established models from legacy manufacturers are still coming to market pretty much on t schedule. While overall sales of new turboprops are down, the decrease is nowhere near the 37-percent decline in new business jet sales. New sales of established turboprop models are down slightly for everyone year over year through the second quarter. Collectively, new turboprop shipments were down 13.6 percent, according to the General Aviation Manufacturers Association. Several companies that last year claimed to have funds in hand to finish their development programs for all-new aircraft encountered financing difficulties this year. Epic LT the aircraft for Farnborough collapsed and ize and it would be moved in at Melbourne recently has Germany’s Dornier family Hints of trouble began to emerge at Farnborough filed for bankruptcy in Sep- by year-end. A new date for first flight of a made a serious attempt at building an order Bend, Ore.-based Epic more than a year tember last year after failing to attract suffi- conforming prototype–previously scheduled book and planning for production. So far ago when a deal for a $200 million infusion cient investment capital. A new ownership for July of this year–has not been set. the company has letters of intent (LOI) for from an Indian billionaire collapsed, the group took over the company this year and A preliminary nonconforming proto- more than 25 of the $6 million, 180-knot, company skipped EAA AirVenture and plans to continue development, but details type of the Model 12 first flew in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • ATR-42/72 Rev 6
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Report Revision: 6 Date: 10/14/2016 Manufacturer ATR – GIE Avions de Transport Régional Type Certification Data Sheet (TCDS) A53EU TCDS Identifiers ATR-42 ATR-72 ATR-42-200-300-320-500-600 ATR-72-101-102-201-202-211-212A-212 Pilot Type Rating ATR42 ATR72 Timothy C. Hayward, Chair Flight Standardization Board Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards Division Seattle Aircraft Evaluation Group 1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-3356 Telephone: (425) 917-6600 Fax: (425) 917-6638 Revision 6 10/14/2016 ATR-42/ATR-72 FSB Report RECORD OF REVISIONS REVISION SECTION PAGES DATE 1 9.2.4 17–27 01/10/1994 2 ALL ALL 02/01/1996 3 VARIOUS VARIOUS 07/01/1997 4 VARIOUS VARIOUS 7/15/2002 5 ALL ALL 12/05/2014 6 ALL ALL 10/14/2016 HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE All Sections All Pages: This revision contains minor editorial changes on every page for clarity, consistency, standardization, updated terminology, acronyms, and United States Workforce Rehabilitation Act Section 508 compliancy. Added Clarity for Training for Seat-Dependent Tasks (6.1.7 and 6.1.7). Added Clarity for Second-in-Command (SIC) Training Tasks (6.1.8). Added Clarity for Unique Training Provisions (6.2.6.1). Page 2 of 26 Revision 6 10/14/2016 ATR-42/ATR-72 FSB Report CONTENTS SECTION PAGE RECORD OF REVISIONS .......................................................................................................2 HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE ...................................................................................................2 1. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY .........................................................................................4 2. PILOT “TYPE RATING” REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................7 3. “MASTER COMMON REQUIREMENTS” (MCRs) ..............................................................7 4.
    [Show full text]
  • TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017
    2/22/2017 Aircraft TAC TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017 THE REPOSITORY (SPREADSHEET): This data presented in this repository is a list of approved SACAA TACs as conferred to current foreign TC holders. Aircraft Type/Model File No. Conditions Category TAC Issue Issue Date Reissue Date Common Name 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 & Dornier 328-300 J15/12/529 As per Type Certficate Data Sheet EASA.A.096 Standard Original 11 April 2007 - 328JET (328-300) Agusta S.p.A. (Now Leonardo Helicopter) A109E, A109K2, A109S, AW109SP and A109C J15/12/395 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.005 Standard Reissue 15 September 1996 01 August 2013 AB139 J15/12/493 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.006 Standard Original 21 April 2006 - AB139, AW139 AW189 J15/12/625 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.510 Standard Original 24 November 2016 AW189 Air Tractor Inc. AT-402, AT-402B, AT-502, AT-502A, AT-502B & AT-504, AT-402A J15/12/327 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A17SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 28 July 2016 AT-602, AT-802 and AT-802A J15/12/380 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A19SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 - Airbus SAS A300B4-622R J15/12/565 This certificate is issued as per DGAC Type Certificate number 72. Standard Original 23 December 2009 - A320-232, A320-233 J15/12/593 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.064 Standard Original 23 December 2011 - A330-301, A330-321, A330-322, A330- 341, A330-342, A330-202, A330-223, A330-243, A330-323, A330-343, A330- 203, A330-201, A330-302, A330-303, A330-223F and A330-243F J15/12/584 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.004 Standard Original 08 December 2010 10 November 2016 A340-200, A340-300 and A340-600 series J15/12/382 As per DGAC Type Certficate number 183.
    [Show full text]
  • E N a C / Eetac Atr
    E N A C / EETAC ATR FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Jordi CLARAMUNT SEGURA IENAC14 - Erasmus End of studies report / Treball Final de Grau 11/08/2017 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation 2 3 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Acknowledgements With deepest gratitude and appreciation, I humbly give thanks to the people who helped me in making this end of studies project a possible one. First of all, I would like to offer my special thanks to Souhir Charfeddine, my internship tutor in ATR, for choosing me among the other candidates and giving me the possibility to perform this internship. Thanks for her valuable and constructive help during the planning and development of this internship. I really appreciate all the time she has dedicated to me with all the different meetings we have had inside the company. I have learnt a lot at her side, she has been an amazing tutor. Thank you. I am also grateful to all of those with whom I have had the pleasure to work with during this project. Each of the members I have worked with have provided me extensive and professional guidance and taught me a great deal about certification aspects, as well as other domains. Those include Antonio Paradies, Didier Cailhol, Eric Bédessem, Ciro Manco, Fabien Vançon, Jean-Paul Delpont, Nadège Gualina and Lucille Mitchell. Also, I would like to offer my gratitude to ENAC for first, giving me the possibility to join their Erasmus programme in its great university and then, for allowing me having the chance to do the internship, which has been the best election of my life so far.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Forces Flight 2011/2012 International
    SPECIAL REPORT WORLD AIR FORCES FLIGHT 2011/2012 INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH Secure your availability. Rely on our performance. Aircraft availability on the flight line is more than ever essential for the Air Force mission fulfilment. Cooperating with the right industrial partner is of strategic importance and key to improving Air Force logistics and supply chain management. RUAG provides you with new options to resource your mission. More than 40 years of flight line management make us the experienced and capable partner we are – a partner you can rely on. RUAG Aviation Military Aviation · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen · Switzerland Legal domicile: RUAG Switzerland Ltd · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen Tel. +41 41 268 41 11 · Fax +41 41 260 25 88 · [email protected] · www.ruag.com WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 CONTENT ANALYSIS 4 Worldwide active fleet per region 5 Worldwide active fleet share per country 6 Worldwide top 10 active aircraft types 8 WORLD AIR FORCES World Air Forces directory 9 TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT FLIGHTGLOBAL INSIGHT AND REPORT SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES, CONTACT: Flightglobal Insight Quadrant House, The Quadrant Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS, UK Tel: + 44 208 652 8724 Email:LQVLJKW#ÁLJKWJOREDOFRP Website: ZZZÁLJKWJOREDOFRPLQVLJKt World Air Forces 2011/2012 | Flightglobal Insight | 3 WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 The French and Qatari air forces deployed Mirage 2000-5s for the fight over Libya JOINT RESPONSE Air arms around the world reacted to multiple challenges during 2011, despite fleet and budget cuts. We list the current inventories and procurement plans of 160 nations.
    [Show full text]
  • European Aviation Safety Agency
    TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 1 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET No. EASA.A.084 for ATR 42 and ATR 72 Type Certificate Holder: ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional 1, Allée Pierre Nadot 31712 Blagnac Cedex FRANCE Transport Category: Large Aeroplanes For Models: ATR 42-200, ATR 42-300, ATR 42-320, ATR 42-400, ATR 42-500 ATR 72-101, ATR 72-102, ATR 72-201, ATR 72-202, ATR 72-211, ATR 72-212, ATR 72-212A TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 2 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 Intentionally left blank TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 3 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: ATR 42 Series ...................................................................................... 4 I. General .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. Certification Basis .......................................................................................................... 5 III. Technical Characteristics and Operational Limitations .................................................11 IV. Operating and Service Instructions ..............................................................................18 SECTION 2: ATR 72 Series .................................................................................... 19 I. General .........................................................................................................................19 II. Certification
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]