DOCSLIB.ORG

TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2/22/2017 Aircraft TAC TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017 THE REPOSITORY (SPREADSHEET): This data presented in this repository is a list of approved SACAA TACs as conferred to current foreign TC holders. Aircraft Type/Model File No. Conditions Category TAC Issue Issue Date Reissue Date Common Name 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 & Dornier 328-300 J15/12/529 As per Type Certficate Data Sheet EASA.A.096 Standard Original 11 April 2007 - 328JET (328-300) Agusta S.p.A. (Now Leonardo Helicopter) A109E, A109K2, A109S, AW109SP and A109C J15/12/395 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.005 Standard Reissue 15 September 1996 01 August 2013 AB139 J15/12/493 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.006 Standard Original 21 April 2006 - AB139, AW139 AW189 J15/12/625 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.510 Standard Original 24 November 2016 AW189 Air Tractor Inc. AT-402, AT-402B, AT-502, AT-502A, AT-502B & AT-504, AT-402A J15/12/327 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A17SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 28 July 2016 AT-602, AT-802 and AT-802A J15/12/380 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A19SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 - Airbus SAS A300B4-622R J15/12/565 This certificate is issued as per DGAC Type Certificate number 72. Standard Original 23 December 2009 - A320-232, A320-233 J15/12/593 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.064 Standard Original 23 December 2011 - A330-301, A330-321, A330-322, A330- 341, A330-342, A330-202, A330-223, A330-243, A330-323, A330-343, A330- 203, A330-201, A330-302, A330-303, A330-223F and A330-243F J15/12/584 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.004 Standard Original 08 December 2010 10 November 2016 A340-200, A340-300 and A340-600 series J15/12/382 As per DGAC Type Certficate number 183. Standard Original 30 May 2003 - Aircraft Manufacturing Factory As per Pakistan Certificate of Type Approval (CTA-A1/04) and Type Certificate PAC MFI-17 Mushshak 17-I J15/12/470 Data Sheet (TCDS-A1/04) Standard Original 24 January 2005 - Mushshak Alpha Aviation Concepts Ltd. Alpha HR200, Alpha HR200-120, HR200-120B & R2160 i J15/12/487 This certificate is issued as per CAANZ Type Certificate number A-15. Standard Reissue 27 October 2005 15 May 2014 R2160i Antonov Aeronautical Scientific/Technical Complex As per Aviation Register of Interstate Committee Data Sheet No. 79-32B. Only aircraft manufactured after September 1995 or with Service Bulletin No. 440 carried out are eligible for registration on the South African register. The Service Bulletin applies to the following serial numbers of the aircraft: 1306, 1810, 2009, 2210-2304, 2410-2502, 2710-2806, 2808-2810, 2902-2904, 2906-3009, 3102- An-32B J15/12/404 3402, 3404-3407, 3409, 3410 & 3504. Restricted Original 05 September 2001 - Antonov An-32B ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional ATR 42-300, ATR 42-320, ATR 42-400, ATR 42-500, ATR 72-101, ATR 72-102, ATR 72-201, ATR 72-202, ATR 72-211, ATR 72-212 & ATR 72-212A J15/12/574 As per EASA.A.084, Issue 2 dated 21 December 2007. Standard Original 31 March 2010 - ATR 42 and ATR 72 Aviat Aicraft Inc S-2A, S-2B, S-2C J15/12/114 The certificate is issued as per Type certificate number FAA A8SO, Standard Original 16 July 2015 BAe Systems (Operations) Ltd. Page 1 of 6 2/22/2017 Aircraft TAC TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017 BAe146 Series 100, 200 & 300 & AVRO 146-RJ70, RJ85 & RJ100 J15/12/333 This certificate is issued as per UKCAA Type Certificate number BA 16 Standard Original 10 April 2007 - Balóny Kubíček spol s.r.o. BB12, BB16, BB20, BB20GP, BB22, BB26, BB30, BB30Z, BB37, BB42Z, BB45, BB60, BB60Z, BB70Z, BB85Z & BB26XR J15/12/502 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.BA.003. Standard Reissue 25 July 2006 06 June 2013 Bell Helicopter Textron 412 & 412EP J15/12/091 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number H4SW Standard Original 11 October 2013 - Twin Huey 429 J15/12/626 This certificate is issued as per TCCA Type Certificate number H-107 Standard Original 13 February 2017 Bombardier Aerospace SD3-60 series 300 J15/12/438 As per UKCAA Type Certificate Data Sheet number BA11 Standard Original 31 May 2004 - Shorts 360 Bombardier Inc. Challenger 300 & BD-100-1A10 J15/12/478 As per TCCA Type Certificate Data Sheet number A-234. Standard Reissue 08 April 2005 09 October 2014 Challenger 350 BD-700-1A10 J15/12/429 As per TCCA Type Certificate Data Sheet number A-177. Standard Original 15 May 2002 - Global Express Challenger 601- 3A/601-3R/604, CRJ This certificate is issued as per TCCA Type Certificate Data Sheet number A-131. 100/440, CRJ CL-600-2B16, CL-600-2B19, CL-600- Note: The FAA configuration as defined by FAA Type Certificate number A21EA 700/701/702, CRJ 2C10, CL-600-2D15 & CL-600-2D24 J15/12/293 is also deemed acceptable in South Africa. Standard Original 30 October 2014 705 & CRJ 900. DHC-8-100, DHC-8-200, DHC-8-300 & DHC-8-400 series J15/12/304 As per TCCA Type Certificate Data Sheet number A-142. Standard Original 24 March 2006 - Dash 8 series Cameron Balloons Ltd. C-80, V-77, Z-105, Z-210 & Z-315 J15/12/519 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.BA.013. Standard Reissue 23 November 2006 25 October 2011 Cessna Aircraft Company 172R & 172S J15/12/126 As per FAA Type Certficate Data Sheet 3A12 Standard Original 02 May 2006 - Cessna 172 Skyhawk 182T & T182T J15/12/120 As per FAA Type Certficate Data Sheet 3A13 Standard Original 02 May 2006 - Cessna 182 Skylane 206H & T206H J15/12/186 As per FAA Type Certficate Data Sheet A4CE Standard Original 02 May 2006 - Cessna 206 Stationair Cessna 400 Corvalis LC41-550FG J15/12/557 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A00003SE. Standard Original 25 September 2008 - TT LC42-550FG J15/12/556 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A00003SE. Standard Original 25 September 2008 - Cessna 350 Corvalis Model 208B, Serial Number 208B5000 C208B Grand and above J15/12/306 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A37CE Standard Original 17 October 2013 - Caravan EX Cessna Citation Model 510 J15/12/545 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A00014WI. Standard Original 23 October 2007 - Mustang CitationJet, CJ1, CJ1+, M2, CJ2, CJ2+, Model 525, 525A, 525B & 525C J15/12/260 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A1WI Standard Reissue 02 May 2006 15 May 2014 CJ3 & CJ4 Cessna 560 Citation Model 560 Encore J15/12/324 As per FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet A22CE Standard Original 04 November 2002 - Encore As per FAA Type Certificate number T00012WI and associated Type Certificate Cessna Citation Model 680 J15/12/477 Data Sheet. Standard Original 14 June 2005 - Sovereign Model 750 J15/12/303 As per FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet T0007WI Standard Original 16 September 1999 - Cessna Citation X Cirrus Design Corporation SR20, SR22 & SR22T J15/12/408 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A00009CH Standard Original 22 November 2001 - Costruzioni Aeronautiche TECNAM s.r.l. TECNAM P2002-JF P2002-JF J15/12/422 As per EASA Type Certificate Data Sheet number EASA.A.006. Standard Original 28 February 2006 - Sierra Page 2 of 6 2/22/2017 Aircraft TAC TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.185, with the following additions: Aircraft Flight Manual Supplement No.A21 - South African AFM, or Aircraft Flight Manaul Supplement No.G12 - South African AFM, P2006T J15/12/608 apply. Standard Reissue 09 May 2013 20 May 2013 TECNAM P2006T TECNAM P92-J and P92-J and P92-JS J15/12/422 As per ENAC/RAIType Certificate Data Sheet number A.340. Standard Original 28 February 2006 - P92-JS Dassault Aviation F2000EX EASy and Falcon F2000EX (EASy) J15/12/374 As per Type Certificate Data Sheet EASA.A.008 Standard Original 15 February 2005 13 October 2016 F2000LX Falcon 7X J15/12/620 As per Type Certificate Data Sheet EASA.A.155 Standard Original 07 October 2016 F7X DG Flugzeugbau GmbH LS7-WL J15/12/607 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.095. Standard Original 02 May 2013 - Diamond Aircraft Industries GmBh Diamond DA 40 J15/12/508 As per EASA Type Certificate Data Sheet number EASA.A.022. Standard Original 17 August 2006 - Diamond Star Diamond DA 42, DA 42 M, DA 42 NG, DA 42 M-NG J15/12/509 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.005. Standard Original 17 August 2006 23 July 2014 Diamond Twin Star Diamond DA 42 M, DA 42 M-NG J15/12/571 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.513. Restricted Original 30 March 2010 23 July 2014 Diamond Twin Star EADS SOCATA TBM 700 A,B C2 & N J15/12/440 As per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.010. Standard Reissue 04 November 2002 03 May 2006 TBM 700, TBM 850 Eclipse Aerospace Incorporated (EAI) This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A00002AC.
Recommended publications
  • R&T Activities on Composite Structures

    R&T Activities on Composite Structures

    PUBLIC RELEASE R&T activities on composite structures for existing and future military A/C platforms at Airbus DS, Military Aircraft Mircea Calomfirescu, Rainer Neumaier, Thomas Körwien, Kay Dittrich Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Rechliner Str. 1 85077 Manching GERMANY [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper gives a short overview on the state of the art in composite aerostructures for civil and military aircraft. Major challenges are highlighted in this context and the requirements from military aircraft point of view are illustrated, derived from existing and future military aircraft perspectives. The main objective of the paper is to present the R&T activities in the aerostructure research program called FFS, advanced aerostructures. The activities range here from structural bonding, advanced radomes, new thermoplastic composite technologies and new materials and structures for low observability purposes. A brief insight is given to each of the topic highlighting the challenges and approaches, finishing with a summary of future trends and emerging technologies. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Composites offer several advantages over metallic aerostructures in civil as well as in military aircraft industry including reduced weight, less maintenance effort and costs due to “corrosion-free” composites and a superior fatigue behaviour compared to aluminium. The thermal expansion is much less and the material waste (“buy to fly ratio”) is more advantageous compared to aluminium structures. However, these advantages come along with higher material and manufacturing costs. For the prepreg technology for example the material has to be stored at -18°C, energy and investment intensive autoclaves are necessary and for quality assurance 100% non-destructive testing (NDT) is required in contrast to aluminium structures.
  • ATR-42/72 Rev 6

    ATR-42/72 Rev 6

    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Report Revision: 6 Date: 10/14/2016 Manufacturer ATR – GIE Avions de Transport Régional Type Certification Data Sheet (TCDS) A53EU TCDS Identifiers ATR-42 ATR-72 ATR-42-200-300-320-500-600 ATR-72-101-102-201-202-211-212A-212 Pilot Type Rating ATR42 ATR72 Timothy C. Hayward, Chair Flight Standardization Board Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards Division Seattle Aircraft Evaluation Group 1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-3356 Telephone: (425) 917-6600 Fax: (425) 917-6638 Revision 6 10/14/2016 ATR-42/ATR-72 FSB Report RECORD OF REVISIONS REVISION SECTION PAGES DATE 1 9.2.4 17–27 01/10/1994 2 ALL ALL 02/01/1996 3 VARIOUS VARIOUS 07/01/1997 4 VARIOUS VARIOUS 7/15/2002 5 ALL ALL 12/05/2014 6 ALL ALL 10/14/2016 HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE All Sections All Pages: This revision contains minor editorial changes on every page for clarity, consistency, standardization, updated terminology, acronyms, and United States Workforce Rehabilitation Act Section 508 compliancy. Added Clarity for Training for Seat-Dependent Tasks (6.1.7 and 6.1.7). Added Clarity for Second-in-Command (SIC) Training Tasks (6.1.8). Added Clarity for Unique Training Provisions (6.2.6.1). Page 2 of 26 Revision 6 10/14/2016 ATR-42/ATR-72 FSB Report CONTENTS SECTION PAGE RECORD OF REVISIONS .......................................................................................................2 HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE ...................................................................................................2 1. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY .........................................................................................4 2. PILOT “TYPE RATING” REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................7 3. “MASTER COMMON REQUIREMENTS” (MCRs) ..............................................................7 4.
  • NPA 2018-13 Table of Contents

    NPA 2018-13 Table of Contents

    European Aviation Safety Agency Notice of Proposed Amendment 2018-13 Appendix I to AMC to Annex III (Part-66) Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licences RMT.0541 (66.024) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) addresses a regulatory coordination issue related to aircraft type ratings. According to the AMC to Annex III (Part-66), type ratings should be endorsed on an aircraft maintenance licence (AML) in accordance with Appendix I to AMC to Part-66 ‘List of type ratings’. An NPA is issued regularly to amend this list, after assessing feedback received from the industry, and to add new aircraft types or to remove aircraft types whose type certificate (TC) has been revoked or surrendered. This NPA adds also the tables of the new Group as a consequence of the introduction of the ‘L’ licence subcategories by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1142. The main objective is to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. Action area: Regular updates/review of rules Affected rules: AMC/GM to Annex III (Part-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 Affected stakeholders: Maintenance certifying staff; maintenance training organisations; maintenance organisations; competent authorities Driver: Efficiency/proportionality Rulemaking group: No Impact assessment: None Rulemaking Procedure: Standard 12.5.2009 5.12.2018 2019/Q2 TE.RPRO.00034-008 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO 9001 certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA intranet/internet. Page 1 of 186 An agency of the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency NPA 2018-13 Table of contents Table of contents 1.
  • Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical

    Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical

    Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Engineering Aircraft Design Studies Based on the ATR 72 Author: Mihaela Florentina Niţă Examiner: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Delivered: 13.06.2008 Abstract This project gives a practical description of a preliminary aircraft design sequence. The sequence starts with a preliminary sizing method. The design sequence is illustrated with a redesign study of the ATR 72 turboprop aircraft. The requirements for the redesign aircraft are those of the ATR 72. The ATR 72 serves also as the reference during the redesign. The Preliminary sizing method was available (at the university) only for jet-powered aircraft. Therefore the method was adapted to work also with propeller driven aircrafts. The sizing method ensures that all requirements are met: take-off and landing field length, 2nd segment and missed approach gradients as well as cruise Mach number. The sizing method yields the best (low) power/weight ratio and the best wing loading. The redesign process covers all the aircraft components: fuselage, wing, empennage and landing gear. The aircraft design sequence defines the cabin layout, the wing parameters, the type of high lift system, the configuration and surface of the empennage. A mass distribution analysis is made, the position of the CG is calculated and the wing position determined. Finally the Direct Operating Costs (DOC) are calculated. DOCs are calculated applying the method from the Association of European Airlines (AEA). The DOCs serve for an aircraft evaluation. In order to meet requirements, the redesigned ATR 72 had to be slightly modified compared to the original ATR.
  • Avation Increases to 35 Its Fleet of ATR 72S

    Avation Increases to 35 Its Fleet of ATR 72S

    Avation increases to 35 its fleet of ATR 72s ATR and the Singapore-based lessor announce 5 additional ATR 72-600s Singapore, February 16, 2016 – The world’s leading turboprop manufacturer ATR and the Singapore-based commercial aircraft lessor Avation PLC announced an agreement for the purchase of five new ATR 72-600 aircraft. At list prices the acquisition is valued at about US $130 million and brings to 35 the total number of firm ATR 72s ordered by Avation PLC since their first ATR purchase in 2011. As of today, Avation has already taken delivery of over 20 ATR 72s, mostly ATR 72-600s, which currently fly in the liveries of Virgin Australia, Flybe (for Scandinavian Airlines), UNI Air (Taiwan), Air India and Fiji Airways. Deliveries of the remaining ATR 72-600s on order extend out to 2018. ATR aircraft are the best-selling regional aircraft for below-90-seats size since 2010, representing 77% of global orders for turboprops. ATR is also experiencing an outstanding success among leasing firms in the same period, booking 87% of all their orders for below-90-seat regional aircraft. Avation is the second largest lessor by number of new ATRs ordered. According to Jeff Chatfield, Avation’s Executive Chairman, “We believe the ATR 72 is the most efficient aircraft type for regional routes. It provides the lowest fuel burn and the most reduced operating costs among all regional aircraft of its category. ATRs are superb assets for lessors, they offer great returns and also allow portfolio diversification. Avation raises equity and debt with the London and New York markets and we are proud to promote the ATR in these essential forums”.
  • E N a C / Eetac Atr

    E N a C / Eetac Atr

    E N A C / EETAC ATR FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Jordi CLARAMUNT SEGURA IENAC14 - Erasmus End of studies report / Treball Final de Grau 11/08/2017 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation 2 3 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Acknowledgements With deepest gratitude and appreciation, I humbly give thanks to the people who helped me in making this end of studies project a possible one. First of all, I would like to offer my special thanks to Souhir Charfeddine, my internship tutor in ATR, for choosing me among the other candidates and giving me the possibility to perform this internship. Thanks for her valuable and constructive help during the planning and development of this internship. I really appreciate all the time she has dedicated to me with all the different meetings we have had inside the company. I have learnt a lot at her side, she has been an amazing tutor. Thank you. I am also grateful to all of those with whom I have had the pleasure to work with during this project. Each of the members I have worked with have provided me extensive and professional guidance and taught me a great deal about certification aspects, as well as other domains. Those include Antonio Paradies, Didier Cailhol, Eric Bédessem, Ciro Manco, Fabien Vançon, Jean-Paul Delpont, Nadège Gualina and Lucille Mitchell. Also, I would like to offer my gratitude to ENAC for first, giving me the possibility to join their Erasmus programme in its great university and then, for allowing me having the chance to do the internship, which has been the best election of my life so far.
  • European Aviation Safety Agency

    European Aviation Safety Agency

    TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 1 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET No. EASA.A.084 for ATR 42 and ATR 72 Type Certificate Holder: ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional 1, Allée Pierre Nadot 31712 Blagnac Cedex FRANCE Transport Category: Large Aeroplanes For Models: ATR 42-200, ATR 42-300, ATR 42-320, ATR 42-400, ATR 42-500 ATR 72-101, ATR 72-102, ATR 72-201, ATR 72-202, ATR 72-211, ATR 72-212, ATR 72-212A TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 2 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 Intentionally left blank TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 3 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: ATR 42 Series ...................................................................................... 4 I. General .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. Certification Basis .......................................................................................................... 5 III. Technical Characteristics and Operational Limitations .................................................11 IV. Operating and Service Instructions ..............................................................................18 SECTION 2: ATR 72 Series .................................................................................... 19 I. General .........................................................................................................................19 II. Certification
  • Aircraft Tire Data

    Aircraft Tire Data

    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
  • Police Aviation News SPECIAL EDITION

    Police Aviation News SPECIAL EDITION

    Police Aviation News SPECIAL EDITION ©Police Aviation Research SPECIAL EDITION JULY 2012 PAR Police Aviation News July 2012 2 PAN—Police Aviation News is published monthly by POLICE AVIATION RESEARCH, 7 Wind- mill Close, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex EN9 3BQ UK. Contacts: Main: +44 1992 714162 Cell: +44 7778 296650 Skype: BrynElliott E-mail: [email protected] SHOWS JULY 2012 FARNBOROUGH AIR SHOW Farnborough, Hampshire, UK 9-10 July 2012 Farnborough, one of the major shows in the aerospace calendar and yet in the main one not too kind to the Airborne Emergency Service sector of business. The large size and im- personal nature of Farnborough and its ilk are the main spur for the niche air events – not always shows – including PAvCon, NBAA and Heli-Expo. Visitors are drawn to see displays covering nearly 3,500 square meters from hundreds of international companies housed under cover in a number of vast halls and chalets con- structed at great expense – others being left to the vagaries of the weather without cover or in their own tents and caravans. And this year the vagaries were decidedly nasty as Britain endured the worst summer in living memory. The poor weather clearly affected visitor num- bers early in the week. As the browned grass testifies, Farnborough 2010 was a far drier affair than this year. © Aviation-images.com via FI2012 Front Cover Image: The Bell 525 Relentless has ‘Oil Industry’ written all over it and it may never feature as an emergency services aircraft. That said it has features that could one day appear more widely—including the pilots seats.
  • NASA Technical Memorandum 0000

    NASA Technical Memorandum 0000

    NASA/TM–2018-219833 Short-Haul Revitalization Study Final Report Ty V. Marien, Kevin R. Antcliff, Mark D. Guynn, and Douglas P. Wells Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia Steven J. Schneider and Michael Tong NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Antonio A. Trani and Nicolas K. Hinze Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia Samuel M. Dollyhigh Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc., Hampton, Virginia May 2018 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. advancement of aeronautics and space science. The Collected papers from scientific and technical NASA scientific and technical information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the auspices SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, technical, or historical information from NASA organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates programs, projects, and missions, often NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access concerned with subjects having substantial to the NTRS Registered and its public interface, the public interest. NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest collections of aeronautical and space TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. science STI in the world. Results are published in both English-language translations of foreign non-NASA channels and by NASA in the
  • LY ABY 1990.03.15 Lėktuvas AN-2 2020.12.18 LY AEJ 1976.01.01

    LY ABY 1990.03.15 Lėktuvas AN-2 2020.12.18 LY AEJ 1976.01.01

    Nac. ženklas Reg. ženklas Pagaminimo metai Rūšis Tipas TSPPP galiojimas LY ABY 1990.03.15 Lėktuvas AN-2 2020.12.18 LY AEJ 1976.01.01 Lėktuvas AN-2 2020.10.24 LY AEK 1976.04.27 Lėktuvas AN-2 2021.10.15 LY AES 1981.02.05 Lėktuvas AN-2 2022.02.02 LY AEX 1987.09.29 Lėktuvas AN-2 2021.02.27 LY AFJ 1997.02.01 Lėktuvas JAK-52 2020.05.15 LY AGB 1981.02.04 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2018.06.19 LY AHA 1984.03.06 Lėktuvas AN-2 2021.05.27 LY AHJ 1983.12.01 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.06.29 LY AHL 1979.01.18 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.07.29 LY AHM 1978.12.30 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.07.16 LY AHN 1984.05.31 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.07.23 LY AHR 1980.11.10 Lėktuvas JAK-50 2021.08.19 LY AHY 1987.02.12 Lėktuvas JAK-52 2021.06.04 LY AHZ 1987.04.01 Lėktuvas JAK-52 2020.11.11 LY AIO 1975.01.01 Lėktuvas AN-2 2020.11.12 LY AIW 1987.04.29 Lėktuvas JAK-52 2021.10.27 LY AJC 1975.12.15 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.07.23 LY AJE 1979.10.17 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.06.09 LY AJF 1982.01.15 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2018.06.14 LY AJI 1981.12.23 Lėktuvas AN-2 2021.11.09 LY AJK 1979.08.09 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2020.11.21 LY AJM 1976.03.27 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2018.07.23 LY AJN 1978.12.30 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.09.08 LY AJP 1979.11.23 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.09.17 LY AJT 1979.11.28 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2020.12.03 LY AJX 1977.03.19 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2020.12.22 LY AJZ 1983.02.01 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.01.06 LY AKJ 1978.11.23 Lėktuvas PZL-104 WILGA-35A 2021.10.01 LY AKO 1970.01.01 Lėktuvas
  • Audit of the Drug Enforcement Administration's

    Audit of the Drug Enforcement Administration's

    Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Audit of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Aviation Operations with the Department of Defense in Afghanistan Audit Division 16-16 March 2016 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK AUDIT OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION’S AVIATION OPERATIONS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IN AFGHANISTAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In fiscal year 2008 the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) expended nearly $8.6 million to purchase an ATR 42-500 aircraft (ATR 500) to support its counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan. The Department of Defense (DOD) agreed to modify the DEA’s ATR 500 with surveillance equipment and other capabilities to conduct such operations in the combat environment of Afghanistan in what became known as the Global Discovery program. In addition, through five Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the DOD, between fiscal years 2012 and 2015, the DEA received $29,080,137 from the DOD to support both the DEA’s counternarcotics aviation operations in Afghanistan and the Global Discovery program. As of February 2015, the DEA had expended $10.1 million of this funding for the Global Discovery aircraft. The DOD has also expended an additional $67.9 million in DOD appropriated funds to modify the DEA’s ATR 500 and to construct a hangar at the Kabul International Airport in Afghanistan for the aircraft. Even though collectively the DEA and DOD have spent more than $86 million on the Global Discovery program, we found that, over 7 years after the aircraft was purchased for the program, the aircraft remains inoperable, resting on jacks, and has never actually flown in Afghanistan.