DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Project Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Engineering Aircraft Design Studies Based on the ATR 72 Author: Mihaela Florentina Niţă Examiner: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Delivered: 13.06.2008 Abstract This project gives a practical description of a preliminary aircraft design sequence. The sequence starts with a preliminary sizing method. The design sequence is illustrated with a redesign study of the ATR 72 turboprop aircraft. The requirements for the redesign aircraft are those of the ATR 72. The ATR 72 serves also as the reference during the redesign. The Preliminary sizing method was available (at the university) only for jet-powered aircraft. Therefore the method was adapted to work also with propeller driven aircrafts. The sizing method ensures that all requirements are met: take-off and landing field length, 2nd segment and missed approach gradients as well as cruise Mach number. The sizing method yields the best (low) power/weight ratio and the best wing loading. The redesign process covers all the aircraft components: fuselage, wing, empennage and landing gear. The aircraft design sequence defines the cabin layout, the wing parameters, the type of high lift system, the configuration and surface of the empennage. A mass distribution analysis is made, the position of the CG is calculated and the wing position determined. Finally the Direct Operating Costs (DOC) are calculated. DOCs are calculated applying the method from the Association of European Airlines (AEA). The DOCs serve for an aircraft evaluation. In order to meet requirements, the redesigned ATR 72 had to be slightly modified compared to the original ATR. E.g. the redesigned high lift system shows added slats. In general, the resulting parameters of the redesigned aircraft came out similar with the original ATR 72. Since data of the original ATR 72 is not completely available in public, one of the challenges was to discover the driving factors and secret parameters from the original design. 1 DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Aircraft Design Studies Based on the ATR 72 Project work towards a thesis at Universitatea Politehnica din Bucuresti (PUB) Background Aircraft design studies at universities seem to concentrate quite often at civil transport jets. In this respect, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences is no exception. In order to cover a little bit of new ground in aircraft design teaching, it was decided to pay more attention to propeller driven aircraft, starting with passenger aircraft (certified based on CS-25) and subsequently considering the whole field of propeller aircraft certified based on CS-23, CS-VLA and to ul- tra light aircraft. Emphasis should be given to the respective methods for preliminary sizing of the respective category of aircraft. Furthermore, effects that have to be handled differently from jets should be considered carefully and in depth. Task An ATR 72 should be redesigned. If time allows, preliminary sizing according to CS-VLA should be considered. ATR 72 redesign should comprise of: • Parameter studies: power, propeller efficiency and glide ratio as a function of operational and geometric parameters. • Data collection and evaluation for the ATR 72. • Preliminary sizing of turboprop aircraft for CS-25 – general approach and application to ATR 72. • Sizing of cabin / fuselage, wing (including high lift devices) empennage and landing gear. • Calculation of mass, drag polar and DOC. The report has to be written in English based on German or international standards on report writing. 4 Table of Content Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Content......................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables.............................................................................................................................. 9 List of Symbols ........................................................................................................................ 10 Greek Symbols ......................................................................................................................... 11 Indices ............................................................................................................................... 12 Indices for flight phases ........................................................................................................... 12 Indices for Aircraft Components.............................................................................................. 12 Indices of the Wing .................................................................................................................. 13 Other Indices ............................................................................................................................ 13 List of Abbreviations................................................................................................................ 16 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Motivation ............................................................................................................. 17 1.2 Definitions............................................................................................................. 17 1.3 Task ....................................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Literature ............................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Structure of Work.................................................................................................. 19 2 ATR 72 Parameters ............................................................................................ 20 3 Preliminary sizing................................................................................................ 23 3.1 Landing distance.................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Take-off Distance.................................................................................................. 25 3.3 Climb Rate during 2nd Segment............................................................................. 28 3.4 Climb Rate during Missed Approach.................................................................... 30 3.5 Cruise..................................................................................................................... 31 3.5.1 Power to weight ratio ............................................................................................ 31 3.5.2 Estimation of Lift to Drag Ratio during Cruise..................................................... 32 3.5.3 Estimation of Power Variation with Height.......................................................... 35 3.5.4 Wing Loading........................................................................................................ 39 3.5.5 Propeller Efficiency............................................................................................... 40 3.5.6 Results ................................................................................................................... 41 3.6 Matching Chart...................................................................................................... 42 3.7 Maximum Take-off Mass...................................................................................... 43 3.7.1 Relative Fuel Mass ................................................................................................ 43 3.7.2 Relative Operating Empty Weight ........................................................................ 47 5 3.7.3 Payload .................................................................................................................. 47 3.8 Design Parameters................................................................................................. 48 3.9 Comparing values.................................................................................................. 49 4 Fuselage Design.................................................................................................... 50 4.1 Fuselage cross section ........................................................................................... 50 4.2 Cabin Layout ......................................................................................................... 53 4.3 Cargo compartments.............................................................................................. 55 4.4 Emergency Exits.................................................................................................... 56 4.5 Water line .............................................................................................................. 57 5. Wing Layout ........................................................................................................ 59 5.1 Wing Parameters ................................................................................................... 61 5.2 Position of the wing............................................................................................... 62 5.3 Design Mach Number ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • R&T Activities on Composite Structures
    PUBLIC RELEASE R&T activities on composite structures for existing and future military A/C platforms at Airbus DS, Military Aircraft Mircea Calomfirescu, Rainer Neumaier, Thomas Körwien, Kay Dittrich Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Rechliner Str. 1 85077 Manching GERMANY [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper gives a short overview on the state of the art in composite aerostructures for civil and military aircraft. Major challenges are highlighted in this context and the requirements from military aircraft point of view are illustrated, derived from existing and future military aircraft perspectives. The main objective of the paper is to present the R&T activities in the aerostructure research program called FFS, advanced aerostructures. The activities range here from structural bonding, advanced radomes, new thermoplastic composite technologies and new materials and structures for low observability purposes. A brief insight is given to each of the topic highlighting the challenges and approaches, finishing with a summary of future trends and emerging technologies. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Composites offer several advantages over metallic aerostructures in civil as well as in military aircraft industry including reduced weight, less maintenance effort and costs due to “corrosion-free” composites and a superior fatigue behaviour compared to aluminium. The thermal expansion is much less and the material waste (“buy to fly ratio”) is more advantageous compared to aluminium structures. However, these advantages come along with higher material and manufacturing costs. For the prepreg technology for example the material has to be stored at -18°C, energy and investment intensive autoclaves are necessary and for quality assurance 100% non-destructive testing (NDT) is required in contrast to aluminium structures.
    [Show full text]
  • TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017
    2/22/2017 Aircraft TAC TAC Register Rev 6 22 Feb 2017 THE REPOSITORY (SPREADSHEET): This data presented in this repository is a list of approved SACAA TACs as conferred to current foreign TC holders. Aircraft Type/Model File No. Conditions Category TAC Issue Issue Date Reissue Date Common Name 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 & Dornier 328-300 J15/12/529 As per Type Certficate Data Sheet EASA.A.096 Standard Original 11 April 2007 - 328JET (328-300) Agusta S.p.A. (Now Leonardo Helicopter) A109E, A109K2, A109S, AW109SP and A109C J15/12/395 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.005 Standard Reissue 15 September 1996 01 August 2013 AB139 J15/12/493 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.006 Standard Original 21 April 2006 - AB139, AW139 AW189 J15/12/625 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.R.510 Standard Original 24 November 2016 AW189 Air Tractor Inc. AT-402, AT-402B, AT-502, AT-502A, AT-502B & AT-504, AT-402A J15/12/327 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A17SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 28 July 2016 AT-602, AT-802 and AT-802A J15/12/380 This certificate is issued as per FAA Type Certificate number A19SW Restricted Original 15 October 2013 - Airbus SAS A300B4-622R J15/12/565 This certificate is issued as per DGAC Type Certificate number 72. Standard Original 23 December 2009 - A320-232, A320-233 J15/12/593 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.064 Standard Original 23 December 2011 - A330-301, A330-321, A330-322, A330- 341, A330-342, A330-202, A330-223, A330-243, A330-323, A330-343, A330- 203, A330-201, A330-302, A330-303, A330-223F and A330-243F J15/12/584 This certificate is issued as per EASA Type Certificate number EASA.A.004 Standard Original 08 December 2010 10 November 2016 A340-200, A340-300 and A340-600 series J15/12/382 As per DGAC Type Certficate number 183.
    [Show full text]
  • Avation Increases to 35 Its Fleet of ATR 72S
    Avation increases to 35 its fleet of ATR 72s ATR and the Singapore-based lessor announce 5 additional ATR 72-600s Singapore, February 16, 2016 – The world’s leading turboprop manufacturer ATR and the Singapore-based commercial aircraft lessor Avation PLC announced an agreement for the purchase of five new ATR 72-600 aircraft. At list prices the acquisition is valued at about US $130 million and brings to 35 the total number of firm ATR 72s ordered by Avation PLC since their first ATR purchase in 2011. As of today, Avation has already taken delivery of over 20 ATR 72s, mostly ATR 72-600s, which currently fly in the liveries of Virgin Australia, Flybe (for Scandinavian Airlines), UNI Air (Taiwan), Air India and Fiji Airways. Deliveries of the remaining ATR 72-600s on order extend out to 2018. ATR aircraft are the best-selling regional aircraft for below-90-seats size since 2010, representing 77% of global orders for turboprops. ATR is also experiencing an outstanding success among leasing firms in the same period, booking 87% of all their orders for below-90-seat regional aircraft. Avation is the second largest lessor by number of new ATRs ordered. According to Jeff Chatfield, Avation’s Executive Chairman, “We believe the ATR 72 is the most efficient aircraft type for regional routes. It provides the lowest fuel burn and the most reduced operating costs among all regional aircraft of its category. ATRs are superb assets for lessors, they offer great returns and also allow portfolio diversification. Avation raises equity and debt with the London and New York markets and we are proud to promote the ATR in these essential forums”.
    [Show full text]
  • E N a C / Eetac Atr
    E N A C / EETAC ATR FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Jordi CLARAMUNT SEGURA IENAC14 - Erasmus End of studies report / Treball Final de Grau 11/08/2017 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation 2 3 FAA regulation analysis for ATR ETOPS validation Acknowledgements With deepest gratitude and appreciation, I humbly give thanks to the people who helped me in making this end of studies project a possible one. First of all, I would like to offer my special thanks to Souhir Charfeddine, my internship tutor in ATR, for choosing me among the other candidates and giving me the possibility to perform this internship. Thanks for her valuable and constructive help during the planning and development of this internship. I really appreciate all the time she has dedicated to me with all the different meetings we have had inside the company. I have learnt a lot at her side, she has been an amazing tutor. Thank you. I am also grateful to all of those with whom I have had the pleasure to work with during this project. Each of the members I have worked with have provided me extensive and professional guidance and taught me a great deal about certification aspects, as well as other domains. Those include Antonio Paradies, Didier Cailhol, Eric Bédessem, Ciro Manco, Fabien Vançon, Jean-Paul Delpont, Nadège Gualina and Lucille Mitchell. Also, I would like to offer my gratitude to ENAC for first, giving me the possibility to join their Erasmus programme in its great university and then, for allowing me having the chance to do the internship, which has been the best election of my life so far.
    [Show full text]
  • European Aviation Safety Agency
    TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 1 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET No. EASA.A.084 for ATR 42 and ATR 72 Type Certificate Holder: ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional 1, Allée Pierre Nadot 31712 Blagnac Cedex FRANCE Transport Category: Large Aeroplanes For Models: ATR 42-200, ATR 42-300, ATR 42-320, ATR 42-400, ATR 42-500 ATR 72-101, ATR 72-102, ATR 72-201, ATR 72-202, ATR 72-211, ATR 72-212, ATR 72-212A TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 2 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 Intentionally left blank TCDS No.: EASA.A.084 ATR 42 - ATR 72 Page 3 of 35 Issue: 03 Date: 17 October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: ATR 42 Series ...................................................................................... 4 I. General .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. Certification Basis .......................................................................................................... 5 III. Technical Characteristics and Operational Limitations .................................................11 IV. Operating and Service Instructions ..............................................................................18 SECTION 2: ATR 72 Series .................................................................................... 19 I. General .........................................................................................................................19 II. Certification
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Rating of an Aircraft, Compare the Aircraft Model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation Column Below
    FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 19 06/28/2021 FIGURE 5-88, PILOT CERTIFICATE AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATIONS – AIRPLANE NOTE: 1. As of November 2015 the FAA has begun removing marketing names from the Civil Model Designation column. When determining the appropriate type rating of an aircraft, compare the aircraft model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation column below. The column titled Current Type Rating Designation will show the appropriate type rating for this aircraft. EQUIVALENT CURRENT TYPE TYPE CERTIFICATE CIVIL MODEL PRIOR MODEL MILITARY RATING HOLDER DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 C-146A DO-328 Dornier 328-300 None D328JET Aero Commander Division (See Israel Aircraft Industries None Ltd.) Aérospatiale, France SN 601 Corvette None SN-601 Aérospatiale/Aeritalia, France (See ATR – GIE Avions de None Transport Régional) Airbus A340-200 Series: None A-340 Models: A340-211, -212, -213 A340-300 Series: Models: A340-311, -312, -313 A340-500 Series: Models: A340-541 A340-600 Series: Models: A340-642 Airbus Canada Limited BD-500-1A10 None BD500 Partnership BD-500-1A11 Airbus Defense and Space S.A. Model: C-212-CB, C-212-CC, None CA-212 C-212-CD, C-212-CE, C-212-CF, C-212-DF, C-212-DE Model CN-235, CN-235 CN-235 Series C-295 CN-235-100, CN-235-200, CN-235-300, C-295 Airbus SAS A300, Model B2-1A None A-300 A300, Model B2-1C A300, Model B4-2C A300, Model B2K-3C A300, Model B4-103 A300, Model B2-203 A300, Model B4-203 A300, Model B4-601
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing 787 Dreamliner
    Company Highlights February 2010 1 Finmeccanica: a global player • Finmeccanica is a global aerospace, defense and security company based in Italy • Finmeccanica is among the world’s best performing high-tech companies in helicopters, swing role aircraft, training and tactical transport aircraft, defense electronics, defense systems, aerostructures, air traffic management systems, space infrastructures and satellite services • More than 100 subsidiaries and 73,398 staff 2 Finmeccanica Organisation and 2008 Reported Results AERONAUTICS HELICOPTERS SPACE DEFENCE ENERGY DEFENCE TRANSPORT AND SECURITY SYSTEMS KEY 2008 FIGURES (EUR million) ELECTRONICS Revenues 15,037 Adj. EBITA* 1,305 New Orders 17,575 Order Backlog 42,937 R&D 1,809 Employees 73,398 2,530 € M 3,035 € M 994 € M 4,362 € M 1,333 € M 1,116 € M 1,759 € M • Alenia • AgustaWestland • Thales • SELEX Galileo • Ansaldo Energia • Oto Melara • Ansaldo STS KEY 2007 FIGURES (EUR million) Aeronautica Alenia Space WASS • AnsaldoBreda • Alenia • SELEX • Telespazio Communications • MBDA Aermacchi Revenues 13,429 • Alenia • SELEX Adj. EBITA* 1,045 Aeronavali Sistemi Integrati • Alenia North America New Orders 17,916 • Alenia Composite • SELEX Service Order Backlog 39,304 • Alenia Improvement Management R&D 1,836 • Alenia SIA • Elsag Datamat Employees 60,748 • Alenia Hellas • Eurofighter • Seicos • GIE ATR • GMAS • Vega Group • SuperJet International • DRS Technologies • SCAC (since Oct 2008) (*) Operating result before: - Any goodwill impairment - Amortisation of intangibles acquired under
    [Show full text]
  • Valid Business Aircraft Types for Toronto Pearson
    Valid Business Aircraft Types for Toronto Pearson type mfgr model JUN1 KAMINSKAS Jungster 1 JUN2 KAMINSKAS Jungster 2 A002 IRKUT A-002 A1 DOUGLAS AD Skyraider A10 FAIRCHILD (1) OA-10 Thunderbolt 2 A109 AGUSTA Grand A119 AGUSTA AW-119 Koala A122 AEROTEC (1) A-122 Uirapuru A124 ANTONOV An-124 Ruslan A129 AGUSTA T-129 A139 AGUSTAWESTLAND AW-139 A140 ANTONOV An-140 A148 ANTONOV An-148 A149 AGUSTA AW-149 A158 ANTONOV An-158 A16 AVIADESIGN A-16 Sport Falcon A169 AGUSTAWESTLAND AW-169 A178 ANTONOV An-178 A189 AGUSTAWESTLAND AW-189 A19 AEROPRACT A-19 A19N AIRBUS A-319neo A20 DOUGLAS A-20 Havoc A205 OSKBES-MAI MAI-205 A20J SCHLEICHER ASW-20J A20N AIRBUS A-320neo A21 AEROPRACT Solo A210 AQUILA AT-01 A211 ALFA-M A-211 A21N AIRBUS A-321neo A22 SADLER Piranha A223 OSKBES-MAI Kityonok A225 ANTONOV An-225 Mriya A23 AEROPRACT Dragon A25 AEROPRACT A-25 Breeze A251 AVIATIK-ALYANS Aleks-251 A27 AEROPRACT A-27 A270 AERO (2) Ibis A29 AVANTAGE A-29 A2RT KAZAN Ansat 2RT A3 DOUGLAS A-3 Skywarrior A306 AIRBUS A-300B4-600 A30B AIRBUS A-300B2 A31 AVANTAGE Spectrum A310 AIRBUS Polaris A318 AIRBUS Elite A319 AIRBUS VC-1 ACJ A320 AIRBUS A-320 Prestige A321 AIRBUS A-321 A33 AEROPRACT A-33 A332 AIRBUS Voyager A333 AIRBUS A-330-300 A337 AIRBUS A-330-700 Beluga XL A338 AIRBUS A-330-800 A339 AIRBUS A-330-900 A342 AIRBUS A-340-200 Prestige A343 AIRBUS A-340-300 Prestige A345 AIRBUS A-340-500 Prestige A346 AIRBUS A-340-600 Prestige A35 AVANTAGE A-35 Scanner A359 AIRBUS A-350-900 XWB A35K AIRBUS A-350-1000 XWB A37 CESSNA Dragonfly A388 AIRBUS A-380-800 Prestige A3ST AIRBUS
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 EMISSIONS from COMMERCIAL AVIATION: 2013, 2018, and 2019 Down from Nearly 19% in 2013
    OCTOBER 2020 CO2 EMISSIONS FROM COMMERCIAL AVIATION 2013, 2018, AND 2019 BRANDON GRAVER, PH.D., DAN RUTHERFORD, PH.D., AND SOLA ZHENG ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Jennifer Callahan and Dale Hall (ICCT), Tim Johnson (Aviation Environment Federation), and Andrew Murphy (Transport & Environment) for their review. This work was conducted with generous support from the Aspen Global Change Institute. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Additional country-specific operations and CO2 emissions data for 2013, 2018, and 2019 can be found on the ICCT website. International Council on Clean Transportation 1500 K Street NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2020 International Council on Clean Transportation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Last year, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) developed a bottom-up, global aviation inventory to better understand carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from commercial aviation in 2018. This report updates the operations and emissions analyses for calendar year 2018 based on improved source data, and includes new analyses for 2013 and 2019. In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) requested its technical experts develop a global CO2 emissions standard for aircraft, and states began to submit voluntary action plans to reduce CO2 emissions from aviation. This paper details a global, transparent, and geographically allocated CO2 inventory for three years of commercial aviation, using operations data from OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited, ICAO, individual airlines, and the Piano aircraft emissions modeling software. Our Global Aviation Carbon Assessment (GACA) model estimated CO2 emissions from global passenger and cargo operations on par with totals reported by industry (Figure ES-1). In all three analyzed years, passenger flights were responsible for approximately 85% of commercial aviation CO2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospatiale ATR-42/72 (Aerospatiale-ATR.Pdf)
    18850 Adams Ct Phone: 408/738-3959 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Toll Free (U.S.): 800/777-6405 www.AircraftCovers.com Fax: 408/738-2729 Email: [email protected] manufacturer of the finest custom-made aircraft covers Tech Sheet: Aerospatiale ATR-42/72 (aerospatiale-ATR.pdf) ATR-42 Cockpit Cover ATR-42 Cockpit Cover Section 1: Canopy/Cockpit/Fuselage Covers The Aerospatiale ATR-42/72 Cockpit Cover helps reduce damage to the upholstery and avionics caused by excessive heat and can eliminate problems caused by leaking door and window seals. They keep the windshield and window surfaces clean and help prevent vandalism and theft. Cockpit covers are designed to cover the windshield and side windows of the cockpit. Attachment buckles are made of nonmetal Delrin, designed for rugged outdoor use. The windshield cover comes with a duffle bag. The N-number can be imprinted onto the cover for an extra charge. The windshield cover is trimmed in the colors of the aircraft. This cover type is made from Silver Acrylic Sunbrella canvas and is 100% lined with a soft and smooth microfiber. Bruce's Custom Covers developed this material combination especially for aircraft protection. The outer material is medium weight and treated for water resistance, UV resistance and anti-static buildup. The inner lining is a very soft and smooth microfiber to prevent scratching. The material is very reflective, and tests show that the cabin interior temperature can be reduced to near-ambient temperature on the hottest of days. It is water, ice and snow repellent, yet breathable to allow moisture to escape from between the cover and the aircraft surface.
    [Show full text]
  • ACN's) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBERS (ACN's
    Transport Canada Technical Evaluation Engineering Aircraft Classification Numbers (ACN's) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBERS (ACN's) Flexibile Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades ST CBR [%] k [MPa/m] Weight Load on High Medium Low V.Low High Medium Low V.Low SB one main Tire Max/Min A B C D A B C D Aircraft gear Pressure [cm] [kN] [%] [MPa] 15 10 6 3 150 80 40 20 A300B, B2 1353 46.5 1.16 39 44 54 69 35 43 51 58 89 840 21 23 27 36 19 22 26 31 140 A300B4-200 1627 46.5 1.28 50 57 69 86 46 56 66 75 89 1236 35 38 46 60 32 38 45 51 140 A300B4-200 1627 1.16 47 52 64 82 41 49 59 68 (Optional Bogie) 1236 33 36 42 56 28 33 40 47 A300B4-600R 1693 1.35 54 61 74 92 51 61 71 80 1275 37 41 49 64 34 41 48 55 A300B4-600R 1693 1.21 50 56 69 88 44 54 64 74 (Optional Bogie) 1275 35 38 45 60 30 36 43 50 A300C4 1627 1.24 48 55 67 85 44 53 63 72 1216 33 36 43 57 30 35 42 48 A310-200, 200C 1509 1.46 45 50 61 77 43 51 59 67 800 20 21 24 32 19 21 25 29 A310-300 1480 1.19 44 50 61 77 40 48 57 65 1108 30 33 39 52 27 32 38 44 A310-300 1549 1.48 48 54 65 82 46 55 64 72 1118 31 34 40 53 30 35 41 47 A310-300 1617 1.29 50 57 69 86 47 56 66 75 1118 31 34 40 53 28 33 39 45 A310-322 SR, BB 1500 1.45 44 49 60 77 42 50 59 67 1064 29 31 36 48 27 31 37 42 A310-324 1540 1.24 44 49 60 77 41 50 59 67 800 19 20 23 31 18 20 24 28 A310-325 1608 1.38 48 54 66 84 46 55 64 73 1100 30 32 38 50 27 32 38 44 A318-100 607 0.89 29 31 35 41 31 34 36 38 382 17 18 20 23 18 19 21 22 A319-100 632 0.89 30 32 36 42 31 34 37 39 382 17 18 19 23 17 19 20 22 A319-100 690 1.07 35 36 40 46 37 40
    [Show full text]