DOCSLIB.ORG

Due Diligence on Social Safeguards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Due Diligence on Social Safeguards Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (RRP KAZ 50387) Supplementary Document 17: DUE DILIGENCE REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS August 2019 Prepared by the Executing Agency, the Republican State Enterprise “Kazvodkhoz” of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Asian Development Bank. This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank Akimat Local Executive Power in the regions and districts DDR Due Diligence Report DP Displaced Person EA Executing Agency GoK Government of Kazakhstan GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IA Implementing Agency IP Indigenous People IR Involuntary Resettlement KVK “Kazvodkhoz “Republican State Enterprise responsible for rehabilitation, operations and maintenance of irrigations and water facilities LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MOA Ministry of Agriculture MOF Ministry of Finance PIU Project Implementation Unit PMO Project Management Office PMC Project Management Consultant ha hectare CSC Construction Supervision Consultant SPS Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) of ADB km kilometer SNiP Construction Codes and Regulations Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 1 B. OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 A. PROJECT IMPACT, OUTCOME AND OUTPUTS ....................................................................................................... 2 B. DESIGN DETAILS INTRODUCED TO AVOID IMPACT IN REHABILITATION OF CANALS AND DITCHES ...................................... 3 C. THE PLANNED REHABILITATION WORKS .............................................................................................................. 4 D. WORK TECHNOLOGY AND MACHINERY SELECTION .............................................................................................. 10 E. THE CURRENT RIGHT OF WAY ......................................................................................................................... 14 DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 15 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................... 15 B. OWNERSHIP OF THE CANALS AND STRUCTURES .................................................................................................. 15 D. SITE VISITS AND SATELLITE MAPS SCREENING ..................................................................................................... 16 E. LOCATIONS WHERE SOME DITCHES ARE NEAR THE HOUSES ................................................................................... 21 E. THE LAND PLOT FOR THE KVK HEADQUARTERS BUILDING .................................................................................... 26 F. PROJECT CATEGORY FOR INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IMPACT ....................................... 28 DISCLOSURE, PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND COMMMUNICATION PLAN .................................... 29 A. PROCEEDINGS OF SIX PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN ALL FOUR PROVINCES ................................................................... 29 B. SUMMARY OF THE QUESTIONS AND PROPOSALS PER PROVINCES ............................................................................ 30 C. COMMUNICATION PLAN WITH THE PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................. 32 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................................................... 33 A. OBJECTIVE AND RESPONSIBILITY...................................................................................................................... 33 B. THREE LEVELS OF GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION ........................................................................................................ 34 D. GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEES ................................................................................................................. 35 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................ 36 A. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK .......................................................................................................................... 36 B. THE EXECUTING AGENCY – KVK ..................................................................................................................... 36 B. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS .................................................................................................................... 37 C. AKIMATS AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES ............................................................................................................. 38 D. SUPERVISION CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTORS ................................................................................................ 38 MONITORING AND REPORTING ............................................................................................................. 38 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 38 ATTACHMENT 1. LIST OF THE CANALS AND DITCHES TO BE REHABILITATED ........................................................................ 39 ATTACHMENT 2. DECREE OF THE REGIONAL AKIMAT ABOUT THE CANALS’ OWNERSHIP (SAMPLE) .......................................... 65 ATTACHMENT 3. CANAL VOLUNTARY DONATION SIGNED DOCUMENTS ............................................................................. 70 ATTACHMENT 4. SAMPLE PHOTOS FROM SITE VISITS .................................................................................................... 73 ATTACHMENT 5. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT CHECKLISTS .............................................................................. 87 ATTACHMENT 6. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IMPACT CHECKLIST ............................................................................................ 89 ATTACHMENT 7. PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISCLOSURE AND PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN FOUR PROVINCES ................................ 91 ATTACHMENT 8. ASSIGNMENT OF THE GRM FOCAL PERSONS BY THE KVK .................................................................... 117 ATTACHMENT 9. CONFIRMATION OF STAFF OF REGIONAL AUTHORITIES AND KVK FOR GRM ............................................. 123 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The report presents the findings of the due diligence for involuntary resettlement (IR) and indigenous people (IP) impact for the project to rehabilitate the existing irrigation network for 171,101 hectares (ha) lands in four provinces of Kazakhstan. Asian Development Bank (ADB) finances the project and the Kazvodkhoz (KVK) is an Executing Agency (EA). 2. The due diligence was conducted from November 2018 to June 2019 as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (ADB SPS 2009) to assess if the project design anticipates: (i) any involuntary resettlement, (ii) any adverse impact to indigenous people, and (iii) review project design details and technologies to avoid adverse impact, if any. 3. The due diligence found that all irrigation canals are state- and municipality-owned. A farmer has donated a 2.7 km long irrigation canal covering an area of 8.2 ha (0.87% of his total 939 ha of land). The canal has not been repaired for years and the farmer is interested in irrigation to increase the productivity of his land but cannot afford proper rehabilitation and maintenance of the canal. The donation is verified as per the laws of Kazakhstan and principles of ADB SPS (2009). The farm is well off and owns 16 tractors, 2 combine harvesters, and 150 large livestock. The farmer is a direct project beneficiary of the project and his household is not vulnerable. 4. The project works include rehabilitation and improvement of the existing irrigation canals to their original designs (with and without lining), restoration of the pipeline systems and installation of the new pumping stations without changes in the right-of-way. No changes are planned in the existing routes, layouts, and capacities of the canals. Analysed site specific civil works technologies were incorporated into the project design which allowed avoiding any adverse impact. 5. The land for the Water Centre building in Nursultan (Astana) city is owned by the municipality and located in the suburb of south-east of Nursultan city. The due diligence counted up 30 tracks using the site as temporary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PIMS 4855 TE REPORT.Pdf
    Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP-GEF Project: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP Project ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Areas (GEF-5): Biodiversity Land Degradation GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agencies: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Date Version 31 July 2018 01 First draft 30 September 02 Final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity- compatible livelihoods in and around PAs Project ID: GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP PIMS ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Strategic Programs: GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy, Objective 1: Improve Sustainability of Protected Area Systems GEF-5 Land Degradation Strategy, Objective 3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce Pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in wider landscape GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Executing Agency: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Responsible Partners:
    [Show full text]
  • Investor's Atlas 2006
    INVESTOR’S ATLAS 2006 Investor’s ATLAS Contents Akmola Region ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Aktobe Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Almaty Region ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Atyrau Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Eastern Kazakhstan Region............................................................................................................................................. 20 Karaganda Region ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Kostanai Region ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Kyzylorda Region .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Mangistau Region ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations on Tick-Borne Bacterial Agents in Kazakhstan
    Out of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maxmilians-University Investigations on tick-borne bacterial agents in Kazakhstan Doctoral Thesis for the awarding of a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at the Medical Faculty of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich submitted by Nurkeldi Turebekov born in Aktobe city, Republic of Kazakhstan submitted on April 29, 2019 Supervisors LMU: Title, first name, last name Habilitated Supervisor Prof. Michael Hoelscher Direct Supervisor PD Dr. Sandra Essbauer 3rd LMU Supervisor Dr. Guenter Froeschl Supervisor External: Local Supervisor PD Dr. Gerhard Dobler Reviewing Experts: 1st Reviewer Prof. Michael Hoelscher 2nd Reviewer PD Dr. Sandra Essbauer Dean: Prof. Dr. med. dent. Reinhard Hickel Date of Oral Defense: November 12, 2019 ii Key words Tick, Rickettsia slovaca, Rickettsia raoultii, real time polymerase chain reaction, serum, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Almaty region, Kyzylorda region, Kazakhstan. iii Abstract Background During the past 23 years the incidence of tickborne rickettsioses increased in Kazakhstan but studies on epidemiological data, vector species, prevalence and distribution are still insufficient to date. Unfortunately most cases of rickettsioses are remained unconfirmed due to the lack of modern diagnostic tests. The purpose of the research was molecular investigation of ticks for spotted-fever group rickettsiae in two pilot regions of Kazakhstan and to detect its role as a cause of the fever of unknown origin (FUO). Methods Six different tick species were collected and sorted from two selected regions in Kazakhstan. DNA was isolated and all tick samples were investigated for the presence of Rickettsia by real-time PCR. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted for positive samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report
    Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Entity Name Uranium One Inc. Reporting Year From 1/1/2020 To: 12/30/2020 Date submitted 5/21/2021 Reporting Entity ESTMA Identification Number E377743 Original Submission Amended Report Cheetah Resources s.a.r.l., Uranium One Amsterdam B.V., Uranium One Holland B.V., UrAsia Energy Holdings Ltd. s.a.r.l., Other Subsidiaries Included Uranium One Netherlands B.V., UrAsia London Limited, Deanco Limited, Uranium One Americas, Inc., Uranium One U.S.A. Inc., Uranium One Friesland Cooperatief U.A., Uranium One Rotterdam B.V., Uranium One Utrecht B.V, Joint Venture (optional field) Southern Mining Chemical Company LLP, Joint Venture JSC Akbastau, Joint Venture Karatau LLP, Joint Venture JSC Zarechnoye, Joint Venture Khorasan-U LLP, Joint Venure Kyzylkum LLP. For Consolidated Reports - Subsidiary UrAsia Energy Ltd. (E137688); Uranium One Investments Inc. (E654178) Reporting Entities Included in Report: Not Substituted Attestation by Reporting Entity In accordance with the requirements of the ESTMA, and in particular section 9 thereof, I attest I have reviewed the information contained in the ESTMA report for the entity(ies) listed above. Based on my knowledge, and having exercised reasonable diligence, the information in the ESTMA report is true, accurate and complete in all material respects for the purposes of the Act, for the reporting year listed above. Full Name of Director or Officer of Reporting Entity Jane Luck Date 5/21/2021 Position Title Vice-President, Legal and Director Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Year From: 1/1/2020 To: 12/30/2020 Reporting Entity Name Uranium One Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • TERMS of REFERENCE Position: National Expert on Support and Coordination of Work During Implementation of the Second Phase of Th
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 53EAE5A9-A79F-4FEC-82FA-A4003FD2523F TERMS OF REFERENCE Position: National expert on support and coordination of work during implementation of the second phase of the Eco Damu micro-loan program Project title and number: UNDP-GEF Project «Conservation and sustainable management of key globally important ecosystems for multiple benefits», 00101043 Duration: 12 months from the date of contract signing, 210 working days, December 2020 - December 2021 Duty station: Home based with trips to East Kazakhstan, Almaty and Turkestan regions Contract Type: Individual contract PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project background, basic information and objectives Kazakhstan has approximately 12.6 million hectares of forest, which makes it one of the most forest- rich countries in Eurasia, despite the fact that its forests amount to only 4.6% of the national territory. Approximately 95% of Kazakhstan’s forests are managed by 123 state forestry entities, which are overseen by regional governments (akimats). Under the current forest governance system, forestry entities lack sufficient capacity to effectively manage HCVF, including those forests neighboring highly biodiverse protected areas. Kazakhstan’s protected area system covers approximately 24,018,800 ha, or 8.81% (as of 2015) of the total country, although only 5% of Kazakhstan’s forests are included within protected areas. Therefore, forest ecosystems are underrepresented in the national protected area systems. Kazakhstan has three main forest ecosystem types: alpine forests, tugai (riparian) forests, and saxaul landscapes (desert and semi-desert shrubs). GEF-UNDP Project “«Conservation and sustainable management of key globally important ecosystems for multiple benefits» (hereinafter referred as Project) has being implemented in Kazakhstan since 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan A series of UNDP publication in Kazakhstan, #UNDPKAZ 06 Almaty, 2004 1 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Report materials could be reproduced in other publications, without prior permission of UNDP, provided proper reference is made to this publication. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Printed in “LEM Printhouse” 78a Baitursynov Street Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan Phone/Fax: 7(3272) 922-651 2 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Foreword by the Minister of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! In his speech at the World Summit for Sustainable Development, the President of Kazakhstan reminded the world community of the global scale of the processes that are underway, and called for prevention of irreversible harm to the environment in order to preserve the necessary life resources for our descendants. Environmental safety and sustainable development issues are of vital importance for Kazakhstan. Water resource deficit and significant land degradation, the Aral Sea disaster, the aftermath of the nuclear tests, accumulation of industrial waste, oil spills – all these problems are no longer fall under the category of environmental ones. Many of these problems are regional and even global. Coordinated interaction between the mankind and the environment and ensuring a safe environment are one of the priorities of the long-term Kazakhstan-2030 Strategy. It has clear-cut provisions: “...increase efforts in making our citizens healthy during their life time, and enjoying a healthy environment”.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Report JP Kyzylorda.Pdf
    Final evaluation of the Joint Programme “Improving the welfare and quality of the life in the COMMITTENTE Kyzylorda region through innovative approaches to delivering economic, social and environmental services to the local population, including those most vulnerable” Final report Astana November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 5 Disclaimer 5 Summary 5 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Context 8 1.2 The Joint Programme 9 1.2.1 Nature and objectives of the Joint Programme 10 1.2.2 An overview of the role of the UN Agencies in the interventions of the Joint Programme. 11 1.2.3 General considerations on the JP approach 13 2. The evaluation of the Joint Programme: approach and methodology 14 2.1 Scope and Objective of the evaluation. 14 2.2 Use of the evaluation 15 2.3 Evaluation methodology 16 2.3.1 Methodological approach 16 2.3.2 Reference to UNEG General Norms for evaluation 18 2.3.3 Evaluation criteria 19 2.3.4 Data sources and collection methods. 23 2.3.5 Identification of the activities (cases) to be analyzed in detail 24 3. The evaluation process 25 3.1 Activities carried out 25 3.2 Limitations of the evaluation 26 4. Findings 27 4.1 Relevance of the Joint Programme 27 4.1.1 Relevance analysis 27 4.1.2 Coherence of the UN JPD with “Kazakhstan 2050” Strategy 30 4.1.3 Coherence of the UN JPD with Kyzylorda Territory Development Program 31 4.1.4 Coherence of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 32 4.1.5 Different approaches of UN Agencies to the JP 33 4.2 Effectiveness 35 4.3 Efficiency 38 4.4 Sustainability of the Joint Project results 40 4.5 Assessment dashboard for selected projects 42 4.6 Outcomes and Impacts 47 4.7 Management, organization and monitoring 49 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 50387-001: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project
    Initial Environmental Examination August 2019 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project Kyzylorda Province Subprojects Project No. 50387-001 Prepared by the Republican State Enterprise “KazvodKhoz”, Republic of Kazakhstan, for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation or, or reference to a particular territory or geographic are in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. TA-9317 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Initial Environmental Examination of Subprojects in Kyzylorda Province Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................. viii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... viii 2. Description of the Project ................................................................................. viii 3. Key findings ...................................................................................................... ix 4. Public Consultation Process ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Zones in Kazakhstan
    2 CONTENT Introduction to Kazakhstan ............................................................................................................................. 4 Support for investors ............................................................................................................................... 8 Definition of Industrial zones ................................................................................................................... 12 Industrial zones of Kazakhstan .......................................................................................................................... 14 Aktobe region’s Industrial zones ..................................................................................................................... 16 Almaty region’s Industrial zones .................................................................................................................... 18 3 Atyrau region’s Industrial zones ..................................................................................................................... 20 East Kazakhstan region’s Industrial zones ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Kyzylorda region’s Industrial zones ..................................................................................................................... 24 South Kazakhstan region’s Industrial zones ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3791260790Var 1518.Pdf
    2 1. Scope Designed for implementation of the training of Bachelor’s Degree students under the "6B09101- Veterinary Medicine" educational program in the Non-profit Joint-stock Company "Kazakh National Agrarian University" 2. Regulatory documents -Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan On Education Astana, Akorda, July 27, 2007 No. 319-III Law of Republic of Kazakhstan (with changes and additions as of 01/01/2019) - State Obligatory Standard of Higher and Postgraduate Education. Approved by the Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 31, 2018 No. 604 - Classifier of Areas of Training with Higher and Postgraduate Education No.569 13.10.2018; - Standard Rules on Educational Organizations Activities Implementing Educational Programs of Higher and (or) Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, October 30, 2018 No. 595. Rules of the Organization of Educational Process on the Credit Technology of Education. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 563 dated October 12, 2018. - Professional Standards of Activities in Veterinary Medicine (from 20.01.2014, No.20/39). 3 1. Passport of Educational Program Code and classification of the field of 6В09 Veterinary Medicine education Code and classification of the major 6В091 Veterinary Medicine Code and name of the educational program «6В09101- Vetrinary Medicine» Type of educational programm Operating Purpose of educational programm The national purpose of education according to the "6B09101-Veterinary Medicine" educational program is providing conditions for receiving quality professional education, professional competence in veterinary science. International standard education 6 classifications level National a framework of qualifications level 6 Level on branch a framework of 6 qualifications Number of the annex to the license for the No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic Of
    The Decision of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 26, 2014 on the basis of the contest choice for the vacant posts of judges of local courts, announced May 6, 2014 is given a recommendation to appoint: for the post of judges of the regional and equivalent courts (19): Esymova Alma Esymovna as a judge of the court of Astana city; Tursunov Oralkhan Tursunovich as a judge of the court of Astana city; Seytov Nurdilla Zeynedullaevich as a judge of Almaty city court; Musabekuly Zhandos as a judge of Almaty city court; Trumova Gulbadan Chokanovna as a judge of Almaty city court; Abdrakhmanova Bibigul Serikkeldyevna as a judge of Almaty city court; Zhanuzakov Samat Nurmuhanuly as a judge of Akmola regional court; Musabekova Marina Tokanovna as a judge of Almaty regional court; Abdullin Farhad Fazilzhanovich as a judge of Almaty regional court; Zhekenova Nurgul Zhekenovna as a judge of Almaty regional court; Azretkulov Dinmuhammed Ankabekovich as a judge of Zhambyl regional court; Idirov Erlan Ilishevich as a judge of the Western Kazakhstan regional court; Urazova Tursyn Sapashevna as a judge of the Western Kazakhstan regional court; Danenova Akmaral Alshynbaevna as a judge of Karaganda regional court; Muhamedin Elik Sergalievich as a judge of the court of Karaganda regional court; Shalaeva Natalia Alekseevna as a judge of North-Kazakhstan regional court; Mukhamedzhan Zhumabay Muhamedzhanuly as a judge of North-Kazakhstan regional court; Smagulov Aydar Askerbekovich as a judge of North-Kazakhstan regional court;
    [Show full text]
  • Бас Редактордың Сөзі Обращение Главного Редактора Chief Editor’S Page
    БАС РЕДАКТОРДЫҢ СӨЗІ ОБРАЩЕНИЕ ГЛАВНОГО РЕДАКТОРА CHIEF EDITOR’S PAGE Құрметті оқырмандар, әріптестер! Уважаемые читатели, коллеги! Dear readers and colleagues! Шуағын төккен көктем айлары және В разгаре весна, и чем прекраснее по- Spring is here in full force, and it seems ауа-райы тамаша болған сайын уақыт года, тем быстрее летит время. Первые that the better the weather is, the faster та зымырай түседі. Жылдың алғашқы три месяца года, несмотря на неустой- time flies. The first three months, despite үш айы ауа-райының тұрақсыздығына чивую погоду, дали хорошие результа- the inclement weather, brought some қарамастан жақсы нәтиже берді. Өндіру ты. Производственные показатели по good results. Planned production results of бойынша өндірістік көрсеткіштер асыра добыче перевыполнены, вместо плано- 1,290,226 tonnes were exceeded, and total орындалды, жоспарлы 1 290 226 орнына вых 1 290 226 тонн суммарно добыто summary production reached 1,315,253 жиынтығында 1 315 253 тонна өндірілді. 1 315 253 тонны. До 72% вместо ожи- tonnes. The share of high-octane gasoline ПҚОП-та жоғарыоктанды жанармай даемых 64% увеличилась на ПКОП до- produced at PKOP increased to 72% үлесі болжалды 64% орнына 72% дейін ля высокооктанового бензина, а объем instead of the expected 64%. Refining артты, қайта өндіру көлемі осы кезеңде переработки за этот период составил output for the period stood at 1,147,435 1 147 435 тоннаны құрады. Жылдың 1 147 435 тонн. Есть основания пола- tonnes. There is reason to believe that all соңына қарай бюджеттік көрсеткіштер гать, что к концу года бюджетные по- budgets will be met by the end of the year, 2012 жылы секілді артығымен және сапа- казатели будут выполнены, как и в 2012 and as in 2012, maybe even exceeded.
    [Show full text]