DOCSLIB.ORG

Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan A series of UNDP publication in Kazakhstan, #UNDPKAZ 06 Almaty, 2004 1 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Report materials could be reproduced in other publications, without prior permission of UNDP, provided proper reference is made to this publication. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Printed in “LEM Printhouse” 78a Baitursynov Street Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan Phone/Fax: 7(3272) 922-651 2 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Foreword by the Minister of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! In his speech at the World Summit for Sustainable Development, the President of Kazakhstan reminded the world community of the global scale of the processes that are underway, and called for prevention of irreversible harm to the environment in order to preserve the necessary life resources for our descendants. Environmental safety and sustainable development issues are of vital importance for Kazakhstan. Water resource deficit and significant land degradation, the Aral Sea disaster, the aftermath of the nuclear tests, accumulation of industrial waste, oil spills – all these problems are no longer fall under the category of environmental ones. Many of these problems are regional and even global. Coordinated interaction between the mankind and the environment and ensuring a safe environment are one of the priorities of the long-term Kazakhstan-2030 Strategy. It has clear-cut provisions: “...increase efforts in making our citizens healthy during their life time, and enjoying a healthy environment”. Moreover, our legislation defines the worsening environment situation as one of the threats to the country’s national security. Kazakhstan has provided a good basis for implementation of its environmental policy. Proper legislative acts have been adopted. The country has joined the major international conventions on the environment protection. The final documents of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio-92) have been signed, and resolutions of the Lucerne (1993) and the Sofia (1995) conferences for Europe have been approved. Kazakhstan was one of the first countries to ratify the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. This publication is one of the Kazakhstan’s commitments under the Aarhus Convention, which provides a broad public with an opportunity to learn about the current environmental situation in Kazakhstan as well as the experience in the area of environmental management gained by the country since its independence. I am positive that the report will be interesting and useful for government agencies, academia, students of environmental departments, public and political organizations, and foreign partners. I would like to take this opportunity to thank UNDP for preparing this Publication. I look forward to our continuing constructive cooperation. Aitkul B. Samakova 3 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN Foreword by the UNDP Resident Representative The health of our society depends in large part on the health of our environment. Unfortunately, since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, we have seen a tragic cycle repeated again and again - human activities bring about environmental degradation, and that in turn constrains further human development. This has been the case in many parts of the world and several notable examples are found here in Kazakhstan. In order to break the cycle, we need to have a clear understanding of the long-term effects that the various human activities have on our environment. We also need the legal mechanisms, institutional structures, and economic incentives to respond to those potential threats. This publication, "Environment and Development Nexus in Kazakhstan," is UNDP’s contribution to that understanding in Kazakhstan. It offers an analysis of the linkages between development and the environment in this country, as well as up-to-date information on environmental conditions in general and an overview of the environmental work of national, international, and non-governmental organizations in Kazakhstan. In recent years, a considerable amount of attention has been given to environmental issues here, both at the national and international levels. The environmental disasters related to the disappearance of the Aral Sea, the nuclear devastation in the Semipalatinsk polygon over several decades, and the rapid decline of the many plant and animal species from this vast land should remind us all that our actions today can have serious negative consequences for generations to come. In 2000, Kazakhstan became a signatory to the Aarhus Convention, stating that the public has the right to access information and to participate in decision-making on environmental matters. In fulfilling this commitment, both private individuals and public institutions in Kazakhstan will be more motivated and better able to manage the stewardship given them over our fragile environment. In our joint endeavors with the Government, we strive to live by that Convention and this publication is just one example of that. We trust that the information and analysis provided here will be useful to the government, academia, international organizations, private companies and private citizens. Although we have taken some initial steps in improving the health of the country’s environment, much remains to be done. We, at the United Nations Development Program, are committed to continuing to do our part. Working together, we can create a better world for the benefit of generations to come. Fikret Akcura 4 ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NEXUS IN KAZAKHSTAN CONTENTS Foreword by the Minister of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan .................................... 3 Foreword by the UNDP Resident Representative ................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 9 LIST OF UNIT MEASURES .............................................................................................................................. 9 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 10 LIST OF TABLES ..............................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 1. COUNTRY REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 12 1.1. Physical and Geographical Conditions ................................................................................................. 12 1.2. Economic and Social Developments .................................................................................................... 16 1.3. National Environmental Management ................................................................................................ 18 1.4. Environmental Legislation ................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 2. CHANGES IN THE ENVIRONMENT DUE TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES ................ 26 2.1. Industry ................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.1.1. The Power Sector ....................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.2. The Oil and Gas Sector .............................................................................................................. 32 2.1.3. The Mining Industry ................................................................................................................... 37 2.1.4. Industrial Waste ......................................................................................................................... 40 2.2. Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................. 42 2.3. Rocket Launching and Testing Sites .................................................................................................... 50 2.4. Urban Areas ........................................................................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 3. CURRENT STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. 61 3.1. Air .......................................................................................................................................................... 61 3.2. Water Resources .................................................................................................................................... 66 3.3. Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 4. IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PIMS 4855 TE REPORT.Pdf
    Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP-GEF Project: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP Project ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Areas (GEF-5): Biodiversity Land Degradation GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agencies: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Date Version 31 July 2018 01 First draft 30 September 02 Final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity- compatible livelihoods in and around PAs Project ID: GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP PIMS ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Strategic Programs: GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy, Objective 1: Improve Sustainability of Protected Area Systems GEF-5 Land Degradation Strategy, Objective 3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce Pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in wider landscape GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Executing Agency: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Responsible Partners:
    [Show full text]
  • Download Factsheet
    Tour Code 13 DAYS MOUNTAIN BIKING KAZAKHSTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN KAZ-KAZ 12 NIGHTS Destinations Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan ACTIVITY PROFILE Tour Meets Almaty Tour Ends Almaty 11 581km Fly in to Almaty International Airport (ALA) Cycling days Total cycling distance Fly out of Almaty International Airport (ALA) Group Size 6-16 riders 48km 926m Minimum Age 18 (on scheduled departures) Avg distance / day Avg climbing / day PRICING DEPARTURES Price US$ 3,150 03 July - 15 July 2022 Bike Hire (Mountain Bike) US$ 260 Single Supplement US$ 350 WHAT'S INCLUDED WHAT'S EXCLUDED SpiceRoads jersey International flights Water bottle Visa fees Support vehicle Alcohol Guide(s) Tips Meals (as indicated) Airport pick up Airport drop off Accommodation Snacks and drinks Entrance fees TRIP PROFILE We will cycle 519 km in 10 days of riding. This is a tough trip due to the altitude and the terrain. We gain elevation slowly to ease acclimation and never sleep higher than 3,000 m. Due to the remoteness of the terrain, we’ll be camping for 10 nights. It is the combination of conditions – altitude, weather, topography, and overall environment – that makes this a challenging tour and a test of sustained riding. Vehicle support, which allows cyclists the option to get into the truck as needed, is available on all cycling days except for the heli-biking day. The helicopter lifts are dependent on weather conditions. Suitability: This trip is designed for the experienced cyclist with a high level of fitness. The lack of oxygen at the high altitudes we’ll be cycling at, as well as the climbs we’ll be doing, means that this is a tough trip, and you'll enjoy it much more if you have a good level of stamina and fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia the Caucasus
    CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition VolumeISSN 1404-609121 Issue 4 ( Print2020) ISSN 2002-3839 (Online) CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition Journal of Social and Political Studies Volume 21 Issue 4 2020 CA&C Press AB SWEDEN 1 Volume 21 Issue 4 2020 CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS English Edition FOUNDED AND PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE FOR CENTRAL ASIAN AND CAUCASIAN STUDIES Registration number: 620720-0459 State Administration for Patents and Registration of Sweden CA&C PRESS AB Publishing House Registration number: 556699-5964 Companies registration Office of Sweden Journal registration number: 23 614 State Administration for Patents and Registration of Sweden E d i t o r s Murad ESENOV Editor-in-Chief Tel./fax: (46) 70 232 16 55; E-mail: [email protected] Kalamkas represents the journal in Kazakhstan (Nur-Sultan) YESSIMOVA Tel./fax: (7 - 701) 7408600; E-mail: [email protected] Ainura represents the journal in Kyrgyzstan (Bishkek) ELEBAEVA Tel./fax: (996 - 312) 61 30 36; E-mail: [email protected] Saodat OLIMOVA represents the journal in Tajikistan (Dushanbe) Tel.: (992 372) 21 89 95; E-mail: [email protected] Farkhad represents the journal in Uzbekistan (Tashkent) TOLIPOV Tel.: (9987 - 1) 225 43 22; E-mail: [email protected] Kenan represents the journal in Azerbaijan (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel.: (+994 - 50) 325 10 50; E-mail: [email protected] David represents the journal in Armenia (Erevan) PETROSYAN Tel.: (374 - 10) 56 88 10; E-mail: [email protected] Vakhtang represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi)
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Ecology of Periphytonic Algae in the Arys River Basin, Kazakhstan
    Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources ISSN: 2578-4994 Diversity and Ecology of Periphytonic Algae in the Arys River Basin, Kazakhstan 1 2 Barinova SS *, Krupa EG Research Article 1Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Israel Volume 1 Issue 1 2 Republican State Enterprise on the Right of Economic Use "Institute of Zoology", Received Date: June 27, 2017 Ministry of Education and Science, Science Committee, Republic of Kazakhstan Published Date: July 15, 2017 DOI: 10.23880/jenr-16000106 *Corresponding author: Barinova SS, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 199 Abba Khoushi Ave., Haifa 3498838, Israel, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract No one information about algal community diversity from the Arys River basin was before this study. The first data about algal and cyanobacteria species diversity was represented for the Arys River basin and compared it to freshwater algae patterns of the related mountain regions. Altogether 82 species were found in 28 samples of phytoperiphyton on 13 sampling stations of the Arys River and its tributaries. Diatoms prevail in studied algal flora. Bioindication characterize the Arys River waters as temperate, moderately oxygenated, fresh, neutral water affected by a low to moderate level of organic pollution, Class II-III of water quality. The pattern of algae and cyanobacteria diversity distribution depends on altitude and local climatic and environmental conditions. Bacillariophyta species was richest in high mountain habitats, green algae, cyanobacteria and charophytes avoid high mountain habitats and have negative correlation with altitude. These results can be used as indicator of environmental changes in the mountainous areas. Three floristic groups were recognized in the studied river communities corresponding to the upper, middle and lower parts of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety in Central Asia
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva Water Series No. 5 Dam safety in Central Asia: Capacity-building and regional cooperation UNITED NATIONS ECE/MP.WAT/26 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva Water Series № 5 DAM SAFETY IN CENTRAL ASIA: CAPACITY-BUILDING AND REGIONAL COOPERATION UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva 2007 ii NOTICE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/MP.WAT/26 UNECE Information Unit Phone: +41 (0)22 917 44 44 Palais des Nations Fax: +41 (0)22 917 05 05 CH-1211 Geneva 10 E-mail: [email protected] Switzerland Website: http://www.unece.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No E.07.II.E.10 ISBN 92-1-116962-1 ISSN 1020-0886 Copyright © United Nations, 2007 All rights reserved Printed at United Nations, Geneva (Switzerland) iii FOREWORD The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), in particular through its Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, is engaged in promoting cooperation on the management of shared water resources in Central Asia – a pre-condition for sustainable development in the subregion. One direction of activities is promoting the safe operation of more than 100 large dams, most of which are situated on transboundary rivers. Many of these dams were built 40 to 50 years ago, and due to limited resources for their maintenance and the inadequacy of a legal framework for their safe operation, the risk of accidents is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Title & Project Number Country, Locality(S), Priority Area(S)
    RAISING COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGION THROUGH INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO REGIONAL PLANNING AND SOCIAL SERVICES (USING SEMEY AS AN EXAMPLE) ANNUAL PROGRAMME NARRATIVE REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: 1 JANUARY – 31 DECEMBER 2015 Country, Locality(s), Priority Area(s) / Programme Title & Project Number Strategic Results • Programme Title: Raising Competitiveness of Kazakhstan/East Kazakhstan region the Region through Innovative Approaches to Regional Planning and Social Services (using Improved quality of life of the population, Semey as an example) and advance progress towards Millennium • Programme number: Development Goals achievement in EKO, in • MPTF Office Project Reference Number: particular in the districts severely hit by the 00080221 former Semey nuclear site Participating Organization(s) Implementing Partners UNDP Ministry of National Economy of the UNICEF Republic of Kazakhstan, Akimat of East- UNFPA Kazakhstan oblast, Akimat of Semey city, UNV UNV Programme cost (US$) Programme duration Government of Kazakhstan (pass-through): Overall Duration: 56 months 9,816,365 Start Date: 01.11.2011 Agency Contribution • Original End Date: 31.12.2015 UNDP – 900,000 • UNFPA – 230,000 Current End date: 31.06.2016 • UNICEF –700,000 • Turkish AID, MFA of Finland, GEF Small Grants Programme • TOTAL: 11,657,365 Programme Assessment/Review/Mid-Term Eval. Report Submitted By Assessment/Review - if applicable please attach o Name: Norimasa Shimomura Yes x No o Title: UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Mid-Term Evaluation Report - if applicable please Resident Representative in Kazakhstan attach o Participating Organization (Lead): UNDP Yes x No o Email address: [email protected] Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 4 PURPOSE OF THE JOINT PROGRAMME .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region
    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region 68 Central Asia Atlas of Natural Resources ater has long been the fundamental helped the region flourish; on the other, water, concern of Central Asia’s air, land, and biodiversity have been degraded. peoples. Few parts of the region are naturally water endowed, In this chapter, major river basins, inland seas, Wand it is unevenly distributed geographically. lakes, and reservoirs of Central Asia are presented. This scarcity has caused people to adapt in both The substantial economic and ecological benefits positive and negative ways. Vast power projects they provide are described, along with the threats and irrigation schemes have diverted most of facing them—and consequently the threats the water flow, transforming terrain, ecology, facing the economies and ecology of the country and even climate. On the one hand, powerful themselves—as a result of human activities. electrical grids and rich agricultural areas have The Amu Darya River in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, with a canal (left) taking water to irrigate cotton fields.Upper right: Irrigation lifeline, Dostyk main canal in Makktaaral Rayon in South Kasakhstan Oblast, Kazakhstan. Lower right: The Charyn River in the Balkhash Lake basin, Kazakhstan. Water Resources 69 55°0'E 75°0'E 70 1:10 000 000 Central AsiaAtlas ofNaturalResources Major River Basins in Central Asia 200100 0 200 N Kilometers RUSSIAN FEDERATION 50°0'N Irty sh im 50°0'N Ish ASTANA N ura a b m Lake Zaisan E U r a KAZAKHSTAN l u s y r a S Lake Balkhash PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC Ili OF CHINA Chui Aral Sea National capital 1 International boundary S y r D a r Rivers and canals y a River basins Lake Caspian Sea BISHKEK Issyk-Kul Amu Darya UZBEKISTAN Balkhash-Alakol 40°0'N ryn KYRGYZ Na Ob-Irtysh TASHKENT REPUBLIC Syr Darya 40°0'N Ural 1 Chui-Talas AZERBAIJAN 2 Zarafshan TURKMENISTAN 2 Boundaries are not necessarily authoritative.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Amantay Nurmagambetov
    WHAT CAN OFFER KAZAKHSTAN HEIs TO FOREIGN STUDENTS? Amantay Nurmagambetov Bologna process and academic mobility center MES RK Nur-Sultan, 2019 THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS STUDYING ABROAD IN THE WORLD 2001, 2,1 mln. students 2018, 5 mln. students USA USA Great 19.4% Britain Great Germany Britain 34% Australia France 52.9% 8.6% Australia Germany, France Japan Canada Belgium 6.7% Italy Spain 2% 11% 4.9% 2% Italy Netherlands 3.8% 5% 1.8% 1.9% 3% 9% Other 4% 7% Other Number of students studying abroad Number of students studying abroad (by country of study), 2001 (by country of study, 2018 Resource: Open Doors. Report on International Educational exchange, 2014. Education at Glance , OECD Indicators, 2018 2 INTERNATIONALIZATION OF EDUCATION: USA EXPERIENCE more than 800 thousand foreign students studied in the USA in 2014-2015 academic year. in 2015-2016 the number of students reached more than 1 million. foreign students brought income to the us budget in the amount of 35.8 billion dollars. Resourse: Open Doors. Report on International Educational exchange, 2016. 2 INTERNATIONALIZATION OF EDUCATION: MALAYSIA EXPERIENCE o According to StudyInMalaysia.com the relative low average tuition fee in the universities tuition fee included in the international ranking is $3000 and average accommodation costs - $5400 per year. average accommodation climate o There are 3 leading universities of costs Malaysia in the city and the foreign branches of HEI such as Monash University (Australia). Admission procedure requirement for Master degree studying – only English HEIs locations and well-developed language exam, without any entrance foreign braches infrastructure exams.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor's Atlas 2006
    INVESTOR’S ATLAS 2006 Investor’s ATLAS Contents Akmola Region ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Aktobe Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Almaty Region ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Atyrau Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Eastern Kazakhstan Region............................................................................................................................................. 20 Karaganda Region ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Kostanai Region ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Kyzylorda Region .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Mangistau Region ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Current Status of the Environment
    6. Current Status of the Environment 6.1. Natural Environment 6.1.1. Desertification Kazakhstan has more deserts within its territory than any other Central Asian country, and approximately 66% of the national land is vulnerable to desertification in various degrees. Desertification is expanding under the influence of natural and artificial factors, and some people, called “environmental refugees,” are obliged to leave their settlements due to worsened living environments. In addition, the Government of RK (Republic of Kazakhstan) issued an alarm in the “Environmental Security Concept of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2004-2015” that the crisis of desertification is not only confined to Kazakhstan but could raise problems such as border-crossing emigration caused by the rise of sandstorms as well as the transfer of pollutants to distant locations driven by large air masses. (1) Major factors for desertification Desertification is taking place due to the artificial factors listed below as well as climate, topographic and other natural factors. • Accumulated industrial wastes after extraction of mineral resources and construction of roads, pipelines and other structures • Intensive grazing of livestock (overgrazing) • Lack of farming technology • Regulated runoff to rivers • Destruction of forests 1) Extraction of mineral resources Wastes accumulated after extraction of mineral resources have serious effects on the land. Exploration for oil and natural gas requires vast areas of land reaching as much as 17 million hectares for construction of transportation systems, approximately 10 million hectares of which is reportedly suffering ecosystem degradation. 2) Overgrazing Overgrazing is the abuse of pastures by increasing numbers of livestock. In the grazing lands in mountainous areas for example, the area allocated to each sheep for grazing is 0.5 hectares, compared to the typical grazing space of 2 to 4 hectares per sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Mission to Golden Mountains of Altai (Russian
    REPORT ON THE MISSION TO GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI WORLD HERITAGE SITE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Kishore Rao, UNESCO/WHC Jens Brüggemann, IUCN 3 TO 8 SEPTEMBER 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary and List of Recommendations…………………………….……..4 1. Background to the Mission……………………………………………………….……5 2. National Policy for the World Heritage property……………………………………..6 3. Identification and Assessment of Issues……………………………………………..6 Achievements………………………………….………………………………………6 Plans for the construction of the gas pipeline………………………………………7 Management issues….…………………………………………………………….…9 Dialogue with NGOs………………………………………………………………….12 4. Assessment of the State of Conservation of the property………………...……….12 5. Conclusions and Recommendations…………………………………………….…..13 6. List of Annexes…………………………………………………………………………15 Annex A – Decision of the World Heritage Committee………….………………..16 Annex B – Itinerary and programme………………………………………………..17 Annex C – Description of the Altai project………………………………………….19 Annex D – Maps………………………………………………………………………23 Annex E – Statement of NGOs……………………………………………………...26 Annex F – List of participants of round-table meeting….…………….…………...27 Annex G – Photographs……………………………………………………………...28 2/29 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The mission team would like to thank the Governments of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Altai for their kind invitation, hospitality and assistance throughout the duration of the mission. The UNESCO-IUCN team was accompanied on the mission from Moscow by Gregory Ordjonikidze, Secretary General of the Russian National Commission for UNESCO and his staff Aysur Belekova, as well as by Alexey Troetsky of the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources and Yuri Badenkov of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Two representatives of Green Peace Russia – Andrey Petrov and Mikhail Kreyndlin also travelled from Moscow to Altai Republic and met the mission team on several occasions. The mission team is extremely grateful to each one of them for their kindness and support.
    [Show full text]